Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CURVES
Dr. Anurag Tiwari
IIM Rohtak
LEARNING CURVE
CONCEPTS
A learning curve is a line displacing the relationship between unit production time and the
cumulative number of units produced.
Predicts reduction in manufacturing costs or direct labor hours as cumulative production
increases.
Based on empirical evidence rather than theory.
Learning Curves can be applied to individuals or organization .
Individual learning is improvement that results when people repeat a process and gains skill
and efficiency.
Organizational Learning results from practice as well, but it also came from changes in the
administration, equipment, and product design.
ASSUMPTION IN LEARNING
CURVE
Learning curve theory is based on three assumptions:
The amount of time required to complete a given task or unit of a product will be less each time
the task is undertaken.
The unit time will decrease at a decreasing rate.
The reduction in time will follow a predictive patterns.
In Manufacturing Case:
Process should be repetitive
Process should more labor intensive
Least employee turnover
LEARNING CURVES AS TIMES
AND NUMBER OF UNITS
Average
Observed Output during
Data Fitted Time
a Time Period
in future
Unit Number Time
A Progress Curve Industrial Learning
FACTORS AFFECTING THE
LEARNING CURVE
Worker’s Work
Material
Skill Method
Product Learning
Tools
Design Curve
Continuous Process
Improvement Design
MODELS
Cumulative average time learning models (Wright Model)
Incremental unit time learning model (Crawford Model)
CUMULATIVE AVERAGE TIME
LEARNING MODEL
Learning increase with a fixed percentage every time when production become double
Formula
Total Time= Initial Time*(2*LC)*(2*LC)*(2*LC)…
WRIGHT LEARNING CURVE
Production
Cost
Unit number
WRIGHT LEARNING CURVE
In Wright's Model, the learning curve function is defined as follows
Y = aXb
where:
Y = the cumulative average time (or cost) per unit.
X = Unit number
a = time (or cost) required to produce the first unit.
b = slope of the function or learning decimal percentage.
= log of the learning rate/log of 2.
LEARNING CURVE-80%
Unit numbers Unit Direct Cumulative Cumulative Avg
Labor Cost Direct labor Direct labor
Hours Hours
1 100 100 100
2 80 180 90
4 64 314.20 78.553
8 51.2 534.592 66.824
40 Units=20(2*0.9)=36 hours
80 Units=20(2*0.9)(2*0.9)=64.8 hours
160 Units=20(2*0.9)(2*0.9)(2*0.9)=116.64 hours
320 Units=Units=20(2*0.9)(2*0.9)(2*0.9)(2*0.9)=209.95 hours
A. $56,660
B. $54880
C. $62,643
D. $112,000
EXAMPLE
Unit 2 Cost=14,000
Unit 4th cost = (14000*0.7)= 9800
Unit 8th cost =(9800*0.7)=6860 cost per unit.
Total Cost= 8*6860=54,880
ESTIMATING THE
LEARNING PERCENTAGE
The following guidelines are useful for estimating the impact of learning on manufacturing
tasks.
These guidelines use estimates of the percentage of time spent on manual work versus the time
spent on machine-controlled work.
75 percent hand assembly /25 percent machine = 80 percentage Learning
50 percent hand assembly /50 percent machine = 85 percentage Learning
25 percent hand assembly /75 percent machine = 90 percentage Learning
SET OF GUIDELINE IN
SPECIFIC INDUSTRY
Aerospace, 85 Percent
Shipbuilding, 80-85 Percent
Complex machine tools for new model, 75-85 percent
Repetitive electronics manufacturing, 90-95 percent
Repetitive machine or punch-press operations, 90-95 percent
Repetitive electrical operation(wiring and circuit board fabrication), 75-85 percent
Repetitive welding operations, 90 percent
Raw material manufacturing, 93-96 percent
Purchased parts fabrication, 85-88 percent
How Long Does Learning Go On ?
INDIVIDUAL LEARNING
Employee Applicant A Employee Applicant B
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
Time
(minutes) 1.0
1.0
0.5 0.5
2 4 6 8 10
2 4 6 8 10
Repetition number Repetition number
INDIVIDUAL LEARNING
General Guideline to improve individual performance based on learning curves includes the following
Proper Selection of Workers: A test should be administered to help choose the workers. These tests should be
representative of the planned work.
Proper Training: The more effective the training, the faster the learning rate.
Motivation: Productivity gains based on learning curves are not achieved unless there is a reward.
Work Specialization: As a general rule, the simpler the task, the faster the learning.
Do one or very few jobs at a time: Learning is faster on each job if completed one at a time, rather than working on
all jobs simultaneously.
Use tools or equipment that assists or support performance:
Provide Quick and easy access for help: The benefit from training are realized and continue when assistance is
available.
Allow workers to help redesign their tasks: Taking more performance factors into the scope of learning curve, in
effect, shift the curve downwards.
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING
LEARNING CURVE
APPLICATIONS
Production planning / EOQ planning
Price forecasting
Petrochemicals
Consumer durable goods
Competitive bidding
Income reporting in accounting
Planning warranty maintenance
Washers / dryers
Televisions
Forecasting industrial accidents
Petroleum industry
Mining
Forecasting automobile accidents on new roadways
LEARNING CURVE
EXAMPLES
TABLE E.1 Examples of Learning-Curve Effects
LEARNING-
IMPROVING CUMULATIVE CURVE
EXAMPLE PARAMETERS PARAMETER SLOPE (%)
1. Model -T Ford Price Units produced 86
production
2. Aircraft Direct labor-hours per Units produced 80
assembly unit