The document discusses different methods for evaluating salesperson performance:
- Graphic rating scales evaluate qualitative criteria but may not detect differences adequately. An example is provided.
- Ranking forces discrimination but has less practicality and difficulty assessing differences between ranks.
- Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) allow for more consistent evaluations through a repetitive process involving decisive events and anchor statements. An example is given.
- Management by objectives (MBO) involves setting quotas, action plans for achieving objectives, and periodic reviews against objectives.
- Descriptive statements require writing short or detailed descriptions of a salesperson's performance on specific, company-defined criteria.
The document discusses different methods for evaluating salesperson performance:
- Graphic rating scales evaluate qualitative criteria but may not detect differences adequately. An example is provided.
- Ranking forces discrimination but has less practicality and difficulty assessing differences between ranks.
- Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) allow for more consistent evaluations through a repetitive process involving decisive events and anchor statements. An example is given.
- Management by objectives (MBO) involves setting quotas, action plans for achieving objectives, and periodic reviews against objectives.
- Descriptive statements require writing short or detailed descriptions of a salesperson's performance on specific, company-defined criteria.
The document discusses different methods for evaluating salesperson performance:
- Graphic rating scales evaluate qualitative criteria but may not detect differences adequately. An example is provided.
- Ranking forces discrimination but has less practicality and difficulty assessing differences between ranks.
- Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) allow for more consistent evaluations through a repetitive process involving decisive events and anchor statements. An example is given.
- Management by objectives (MBO) involves setting quotas, action plans for achieving objectives, and periodic reviews against objectives.
- Descriptive statements require writing short or detailed descriptions of a salesperson's performance on specific, company-defined criteria.
Performance standards for quantitative output or results have a close
relationship with the company's sales forecast or sales budget and quotas for territories, regions, branches, products, and salespeople. This is because the sales quotas are derived from the company's sales budget, which depends on the company's sales forecast. Sales managers must ensure that Performance standards are fair and reasonable. They should not be too high or too low. Step 4:Compare Actual Performance with Standards Periodically, sales managers are required to evaluate the performance Of each salesperson in a permanent record for the benefit of the salesperson in tracking his/her progress. For this, Various types of evaluation methods are used which are as follows: Graphic Rating Ranking Behaviorally anchored rating Scale(BARS) Management by Objectives(MBO) Descriptive Statements Graphic Rating
Itis particularly, useful in evaluating salespeople's qualitative
behavioral or efforts related criteria. Graphicrating scale has many characteristics, such as comparability ,Job relatedness , practicality and standardization. The main disadvantage of this method is that it is not capable of detecting differences adequately in 'performance of individual salespeople or among the performances on different criteria for the same salesperson. Graphic Rating(Example) Ranking Method
This method ranks ,all salespeople according to the relative
performance on a Performance criterion. The advantages of ranking Method are that it forces discrimination in performance of salespeople on each criterion, and provides a standardized approach to evaluation. Itis not useful for decision-making. It has less practicality and it is difficult to assess differences between ranks. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales(BARS) This Method is a repetitive Process and allows different sales managers to arrive at more consistent and Objective evaluations, since the rating scales have similar interpretations. The four different steps involved are as follows: Identify Decisive Events Improve Decisive Events into Behavior Anchor Statements Rate the Effectiveness of the Behavioral Statements Select the Behavioral and Anchor Statements For Performance dimension. BARS(Example) Management by Objectives(MBO)
The most common and comprehensive goal setting and results-based
evaluation method is the MBO method. Steps followed in a typical MBO method are as follows: The sales manager and the salesperson discuss and set sales quotas for specific time period. They also prepare action plan for the achievement of the objectives They review actual performance periodically against the stated objectives Descriptive Statements
Inthis method of performance evaluation, sales managers are required to
write either a short or detailed description of each salesperson's performance on specific criteria. Thesecriteria or bases vary from company to company, but some of the commonly used criteria's are: goal attainment, selling ability, territorial management, job/product knowledge, and customer relations. Another method, used by some organizations, includes writing a profile about the individual salesperson's specific performance, abilities, and potential.