Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 D.N.
Dec-00
Components of the TDH
Wellhead
Wellhead Pressure 3
Ground Level Flow
1
2 Net Vertical Lift
Total Friction Loss
4 D.N.
Dec-00
Flow Flow
Total Dynamic Head
• First we will look at the "net vertical lift".
6 D.N.
Dec-00
Flow Flow
Net Vertical Lift
Wellhead
Ground Level
7 D.N.
Dec-00 Flow Flow
Total Dynamic Head - Net Vertical Lift
• Why is the vertical lift independent of where the pump
is set?
Because if you were to turn the pump off, the fluid level in
the tubing would be the same as the level in the annulus.
Remember the old rule that water seeks its own level?
A better way to look at it is to note that the fluid level
above the pump is providing pressure at the pump
intake. This is energy which the pump will not have to
supply since it is already there.
8 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head - Net Vertical Lift
• What if, instead of lifting the fluid vertically, we move
it sideways? How much work did we do?
None!
9 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head - Net Vertical Lift
• What about deviated wells?
10 D.N.
Dec-00
Net Lift Net Lift
PFL
Regardless of
where the pump is
set or the angle,
11 D.N.
the vertical lift will
not change.
Dec-00
Friction is an energy loss (we actually measure it as a
pressure loss) due to viscous shear of the flowing
fluid.
12 D.N.
Dec-00
Since we have 6500' of tubing:
13 D.N.
Dec-00
2-3/8” 2-7/8” 3-1/2”
7
3
5000
14 D.N.
Dec-00
Is bigger tubing always better?
No
16 D.N.
Dec-00
"Back Pressure" is also a good term since it implies the
correct location in the discharge of the tubing string.
18 D.N.
Dec-00
Casing Annulus Tubing Discharge
or
or Tubing Head Pressure
Casing Head Pressure
Wellhead Pressure
19 D.N.
Dec-00
Wellhead Pressure
This is the equation to convert from psi to feet but we still need to know
the specific gravity.
Wellhead Pressure*2.31
Wellhead "Feet" = ----------------------------------
sp.gr.
elsius and Fahrenheit. 37°C is the exact same as 98.6°F. They are just
two different ways of saying the same thing.
20 D.N.
Dec-00
Wellhead Pressure
Petroleum Engineers prefer to use the API gravity
because it is a larger number and easier to "get a feel
for". The equations for converting from one unit to the
other are:
141.5
Sp.Gr. =
131.5 + API
141.5
API = 131.5
Sp.Gr.
21 D.N.
Dec-00
What is the API of fresh water (sp.gr.=1.0)?
141.5
API = 131.5 = 10.0
1.0
22 D.N.
Dec-00
Wellhead Pressure
This means that we are assuming the oil specific gravity is
0.876.
141.5
Sp.Gr. = = 0.876
131.5 + 30
23 D.N.
Dec-00
Wellhead Pressure
This sounds worse than it is. To get the arithmetic
average, we use the following formula:
Sp. Gr. = ( fw w ) ( fo o )
Where :
f w is the water fraction
w is the water specific gravity
f o is the oil fraction
o is the oil specific gravity
24 D.N.
Dec-00
For our case, the specific gravity is 0.992
25 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
Wellhead Pressure = 465 feet
Wellhead 3
1
2 Net Vertical Lift
Total Friction Loss =
1300'
4000
Pump Set Depth +1300
+ 465
5,765 ft of TDH
26 D.N.
Dec-00 Flow Flow
Total Dynamic Head
28 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
29 D.N.
Dec-00
Oil
Produced Fluid
30 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
31 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
As an example, say we have a well producing on SPS. The
perforation depth is 8350 feet and the pump setting is
6900 feet. We have a sonic level at 5600 feet below the
surface. The water cut is 70% and has a gravity of 1.04.
The oil gravity is 32° API. What is the well flowing
pressure and what is the pump intake pressure?
32 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
141.5
Sp.Gr. = = 0.865
131.5 + 32
34 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
For the portion below the pump, we assume that the fluid is
the same as produced from the well. That is to say that it is
70% water and the average specific gravity is 0.988.
35 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
The perforation pressure will be the sum of the pressure at
the pump suction and the pressure differential between the
pump setting depth and the perforation depth.
36 D.N.
Dec-00
Total Dynamic Head
If we had assumed that the total fluid column in the well
were a crude/water mixture, we would have calculated a
perforation pressure of 1176 psi instead of 1107 psi.
Although this seems like a small difference, this could cause
large errors in the determination of the PI for the well
which, in turn, could easily cause us to undersize a pump.