Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leadership
Motivation
controlling
MOTIVATION
The term motivation has been derived form the word
motive. motive is anything that initiates or sustains
activity.
It is an inner state that energizes, activates pr moves
and that directs or channels behavior towards goals.
Motivation is the process of steering a person’s inner
drives and actions towards certain goals and
committing his energies to achieve these goals
Motivation may be define as the work a manager
performs in order to induce subordinates act in the
desired manner by satisfying their needs and desires.
Thus motivation is concerned with how behavior gets
started, is energized sustained and directed
Define:
According to koontz and o’donnell: to
motivate is to induce people to act in a
desired manner.
employees
Good image of the organization helps in
achieving goals
Build good relations among employees
proper use of human resource possible.
Motivation techniques
Motivation techniques are also known as types kind
method classification and tools.:
1) positive and negative
2) financial and non financial
a) financial or monetary:
i. pay and allowances
ii. Productivity linked wages incentives
iii. Bonus
iv. Profit sharing
v. co partnership
vi. Retirement benefits
vii. Perquisites
b) non financial
i. status
ii. Organizational climate
iii. Career advancement opportunity
iv. Job enrichment
v . Employee recognition programmes
vi. Job security
vii. Employee participation
viii. Praise
ix. Knowledge of secret information
x job rotation a
3) Individual and group
4) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivators
Leading
as a function of management
Leading involves influencing others toward the attainment of
organizational objectives. Effective leading requires the
manager to motivate subordinates, communicate effectively,
and effectively use power. If managers are effective leaders,
their subordinates will be enthusiastic about exert effort
toward the attainment of organizational objectives.
Leadership is the activity of influencing people to strive
willingly for group objectives.
Koontz and O'Donnell “influencing people to follow the
achievement of a common goal. It is the ability to exert
interpersonal influence by means of communication towards
the achievement of organizational goals”
Leadership traits
The increasing rate of change in the business environment
is a major factor in this emphasis on leadership. Whereas in
the past, managers were expected to maintain the status
quo in order to move ahead, new forces in the marketplace
have made it necessary to expand this narrow focus. The
new leaders of tomorrow are visionary. They are both
learners and teachers. Not only do they foresee paradigm
changes in society, but they also have a strong sense of
ethics and work to build integrity in their organizations.
Raymond Cattell, a pioneer in the field of personality
assessment, developed the Leadership Potential equation
in 1954. This equation, which was based on a study of
military leaders, is used today to determine the traits which
characterize an effective leader. The traits of an effective
leader include the following:
Emotional stability. Good leaders must be able to tolerate
frustration and stress. Overall, they must be well-adjusted
and have the psychological maturity to deal with anything
they are required to face.
Dominance. Leaders are often times competitive and
decisive and usually enjoy overcoming obstacles. Overall,
they are assertive in their thinking style as well as their
attitude in dealing with others.
Enthusiasm. Leaders are usually seen as active,
expressive, and energetic. They are often very optimistic
and open to change. Overall, they are generally quick and
alert and tend to be uninhibited.
Conscientiousness. Leaders are often dominated by a
sense of duty and tend to be very exacting in character.
They usually have a very high standard of excellence and
an inward desire to do one's best. They also have a need
for order and tend to be very self-disciplined.
Social boldness. Leaders tend to be spontaneous risk-takers.
They are usually socially aggressive and generally thick-skinned.
Overall, they are responsive to others and tend to be high in
emotional stamina.
Tough-mindedness. Good leaders are practical, logical, and to-
the-point. They tend to be low in sentimental attachments and
comfortable with criticism. They are usually insensitive to
hardship and overall, are very poised.
Self-assurance. Self-confidence and resiliency are common traits
among leaders. They tend to be free of guilt and have little or no
need for approval. They are generally secure and free from guilt
and are usually unaffected by prior mistakes or failures.
Compulsiveness. Leaders were found to be controlled and very
precise in their social interactions. Overall, they were very
protective of their integrity and reputation and consequently
tended to be socially aware and careful, abundant in foresight,
and very careful when making decisions or determining specific
actions.
Beyond these basic traits, leaders of today must also possess
traits which will help them motivate others and lead them in new
directions. Leaders of the future must be able to envision the
future and convince others that their vision is worth following. To
do this, they must have the following personality traits:
High energy. Long hours and some travel are usually a
prerequisite for leadership positions, especially as your company
grows. Remaining alert and staying focused are two of the
greatest obstacles you will have to face as a leader.
Intuitiveness. Rapid changes in the world today combined with
information overload result in an inability to "know" everything. In
other words, reasoning and logic will not get you through all
situations. In fact, more and more leaders are learning to the
value of using their intuition and trusting their own instincts when
making decisions.
Maturity. To be a good leader, personal power and recognition
must be secondary to the development of your employees. In
other words, maturity is based on recognizing that more can be
accomplished by empowering others than can be by ruling others.
Team orientation. Business leaders today put a strong
emphasis on team work. Instead of promoting an
adult/child relationship with their employees, leaders
create an adult/adult relationship which fosters team
cohesiveness.
Empathy. Being able to put yourself in the other person's
shoes is a key trait of leaders. Without empathy, you can't
build trust. And without trust, you will never be able to
get the best effort from your employees.
Charisma. People usually perceive leaders as larger than
life. Charisma plays a large part in this perception.
Leaders who have charisma are able to arouse strong
emotions in their employees by defining a vision which
unites and captivates them. Using this vision, leaders
motivate employees to reach toward a future goal by
tying the goal to substantial personal rewards and values.
Leadership styles
Leadership style refers to a leader's behavior.
It is the result of the philosophy, personality,
and experience of the leader.
Leadership styles can be classified into three
subordinates
Full potential of subordinates and creativity
initiatives.
Participative or democratic style
A consultative leader takes decision in
consultation and participation with the
subordinates.
The democratic leadership style favors
decision-making by the group. Such a leader
gives instructions after consulting the group.
They can win the cooperation of their group
and can motivate them effectively and
positively. The decisions of the democratic
leader are not unilateral as with the autocrat
because they arise from consultation with the
group members and participation by them.
Adv:
Consultative leadership style improve the job satisfaction and morale
of subordinates
It cultivates the decision making ability of subordinates.
It develops positive attitude and reduce resistance to change.
Labour absenteeism and labour turnover are reduced.
DIS ADV
Democratic style is time consuming and may result in delays in
decision making
It may not yield positive results when subordinates prefer minimum
interaction with the leader,
Over period of time subordinates may develop the habit of expecting
to be consulted.
Consultative leadership is considered to be more effective than
autocratic style through there is no empirical proof for this.
Laissez-faire or free rein style
A free-rein leader does not lead, but leaves the group entirely
to itself. Such a leader allows maximum freedom to
subordinates; they are given a free hand in deciding their own
policies and methods
Different situations call for different leadership styles. In an
emergency when there is little time to converge on an
agreement and where a designated authority has significantly
more experience or expertise than the rest of the team, an
autocratic leadership style may be most effective; however, in
a highly motivated and aligned team with a homogeneous
level of expertise, a more democratic or laissez-faire style
may be more effective.
The style adopted should be the one that most effectively
achieves the objectives of the group while balancing the
interests of its individual members.
ADV:
Positive effect on job satisfaction and morale of
subordinates
Maximum possible scope for development of
subordinates.
Full utilization of the potential of subordinates.
DIS ADV:
Subordinates do not get the guidance and support of
the leader.
It ignores the leader contribution just as autocratic
style ignores the contribution of subordinate.
Free rein style may be appropriate when the
subordinates are well trained, highly knowledgeable
self motivated and ready to assume responsibility
Likert’s Management System
Rensis Likert and his associates studied the patterns and styles of
managers for three decades at the University of Michigan, USA, and
identified a four-fold model of management systems. The model
was developed on the basis of a questionnaire administered to
managers in over 200 organizations and research into the
performance characteristics of different types of organizations.
The four systems of management system or the four leadership
styles identified by Likert are:
System 1 - Exploitative Authoritative: The manager under this
system make all work related decisions and order their
subordinates to carry out the decisions. The managers also defines
standards and performance methods.
Responsibility lies in the hands of the people at the upper
echelons of the hierarchy. The superior has no trust and
confidence in subordinates. The decisions are imposed on
subordinates and they do not feel free at all to discuss things
about the job with their superior. The teamwork or communication
is very little and the motivation is based on threats.
System 2 - Benevolent Authoritative: system 2 managers are also
autocratic but they are not exploitative. They adopt a paternalistic
approach towards the subordinates.
The responsibility lies at the managerial levels but not at the lower
levels of the organizational hierarchy. The superior has
condescending confidence and trust in subordinates (master-servant
relationship). Here again, the subordinates do not feel free to discuss
things about the job with their superior. The teamwork or
communication is very little and motivation is based on a system of
rewards.
Carrot and stick approach to motivation is adopted under this system
System 3 - Consultative: manager under this system set goals and
issue orders after discussing them with the subordinates.
Responsibility is spread widely through the organizational hierarchy.
The superior has substantial but not complete confidence in
subordinates. Some amount of discussion about job related things
takes place between the superior and subordinates. There is a fair
amount of teamwork, and communication takes place vertically and
horizontally. The motivation is based on rewards and involvement in
the job.
System 4:Democratic under this system goals
are set and work related decisions are taken
by the subordinates. supervisions and control
are group oriented. Responsibility for
achieving the organizational goals is
widespread throughout the organizational
hierarchy. There is a high level of confidence
that the superior has in his subordinates.
There is a high level of teamwork,
communication, and participation.
The nature of these four management systems has been
described by Likert through a profile of organizational
characteristics. In this profile, the four management systems
have been compared with one another on the basis of certain
organizational variables which are: Leadership processes
Motivational forces
Communication process
Interaction-influence process
Decision-making process
Goal-setting or ordering
Control processes
On the basis of this profile, Likert administered a questionnaire
to several employees belonging to different organizations and
from different managerial positions (both line and staff). His
studies confirmed that the departments or units employing
management practices within Systems 1 and 2 were the lease
productive, and the departments or units employing
management practices within Systems 3 and 4 were the most
productive.
Conclusion:According to Rensis Likert, the
nearer the behavioral characteristics of an
organization approach System 4
(Participative), the more likely this will lead to
long-term improvement in staff turnover and
high productivity, low scrap, low costs, and
high earnings. if an organization wants to
achieve optimum effectiveness, then the ideal
system.
Likert suggested that system 4 is the ideal