Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEBATE
THE DEBATE
CLASS PRESENTATION
1
I CAN
• I know what Resolution, Affirmative and Negative is in
a Policy Debate.
2
Let’s revise
what we know about
Policy Debate.
3
What is a Resolution?
4
What is a Resolution?
5
Who are the Affirmative’s and
the Negative’s?
6
Who are the Affirmative’s and
the Negative’s?
8
What is the Affirmative’s job?
To AFFIRM the resolution:
to agree with the resolution’s “should” statement.
9
1
Debate Round Format
10
DEBATE ROUND FORMAT
Roles & Expectations
Traditionally, there are four roles
in a Policy Debate:
1A- 1st Affirmative Speaker
2A - 2nd Affirmative Speaker
1N- 1st Negative Speaker
2N - 2nd Negative Speaker
11
DEBATE ROUND FORMAT
Roles & Expectations
Each speaker delivers Constructive and Rebuttal speeches
and performs Cross Examination of the opposite team.
● 1A- 1st Affirmative Speaker ● 1N- 1st Negative Speaker
○ 1st Affirmative Constructive ○ 1st Negative Constructive
○ Cross Examination of 1st Negative Constructive ○ Cross Examination of 2nd Affirmative
○ 1st Affirmative Rebuttal Constructive
○ 1st Negative Rebuttal
● 2A - 2nd Affirmative Speaker
○ 2nd Affirmative Constructive ● 2N - 2nd Negative Speaker
○ Cross Examination of 2nd Negative Constructive ○ 2nd Negative Constructive
○ 2nd Affirmative Rebuttal ○ Cross Examination of 1st Affirmative Constructive
○ 2nd Negative Rebuttal
12
DEBATE ROUND FORMAT
There are 4 Constructive Speeches
each followed by
Cross Examinations
by the opposite team.
13
DEBATE ROUND FORMAT
Policy Debate Structure:
1. First Affirmative Constructive ( 1AC ) - 4 minutes
17
2
Prep Time
18
PREP TIME
19
PREP TIME
The Traditional Prep is 3-5 minutes
for each team
for the entire round
that can be used at any time during
the debate round,
except
in the middle of a speech
of cross-examination. 20
PREP TIME
The Traditional Prep is 3-5 minutes for each team for the entire
round that can be used at any time during the debate round,
except in the middle of a speech of cross-examination.
21
PREP TIME
Debate Round Breakdown
23
3
Judging
24
JUDGING
25
JUDGING
It is expected that the judges take clear
notes that show each part of the
Affirmative & Negative arguments,
and most importantly where teams
specifically addressed the other team’s
claims.
26
JUDGING
1 AC 1 NC 2 AC 2 NC 1 AR 1 NR 2 AR 2 NR
27
JUDGING
• Judges’ decisions should not be considered if the Judge sheet
does not include detailed notes and a reason for decision (based
in argument and evidence, not speaking skills).
• This is crucial to the
integrity of the debate. Even
if a student is an excellent
speaker, the judges must
base their decision on the
content of the speech, not
the way it was presented.
28
JUDGING
Judging Sheet Example
1 AC 1 NC 2 AC 2 NC 1 AR 1 NR 2 AR 2 NR
Affirmative Negative
Why did this team win? (Remember to explain why the winning team’s argument is
stronger. Leave out anything about the quality of the presentation, only judge the
content of the speeches here.)
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29
WHAT DID WE LEARN TODAY?
• We revised some basic terms in Policy Debate: Resolution
and Affirmative’s and Negative’s job.
• We learned the roles and structure of the Policy Debate:
1A- 1st Affirmative Speaker, 2A - 2nd Affirmative Speaker,
1N- 1st Negative Speaker, 2N - 2nd Negative Speaker
• We learned how to use the Prep Time during the debate.
• We learned how to act as a judge in a round taking detailed
notes and giving reasons for decisions.
30
THANK YOU
AND
KEEP LEARNING!
31