You are on page 1of 41

Engineering 36

Real Life
Application
Bruce Mayer, PE
Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer
BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


1 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
AL-3100
S2 Seismic Loading
CG Measurements

Bruce Mayer, PE
Dir. System Engineering
23Jul01

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


2 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
System
FootPrint

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


3 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
MacroMicro Main Unit
y

z z
z
x y
x

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


4 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Loader/UnLoader
x

z
z z

x y x

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


5 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3100 MiniEnvironment Housing
y

z z z

x yx

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


6 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Results, MiniEnvironment
 Total Weight/Mass = 25.3 kN, 260 kg,
570 lb
 Maximum Leg Load = 1.33 kN (300 lb)
 Center of Gravity Offset from Geometric
Center
• CG 3% to Left (toward side A-D)
• CD 2% Forward (toward end A-B)
 CG offset Attributed to Fan Motor
Inverter-Drive Unit
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
7 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Leg Loading & Ctr of Gravity
Test Apparatus

D C

Load Cell at Each


Level-Leg

A B
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
8 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Main Unit
Center of Gravity
Test: X-Axis Tilt
Main Unit
Center of Gravity Test
Y-Axis Tilt

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


9 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Load/Unload Unit

Center of Gravity
Test: X-Axis Tilt

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


10 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Load/Unload Unit
Center of Gravity
Test: X-Axis Tilt
BEFORE
 Level
 0.04° Tilt

AFTER
 Level
 3.17° Tilt

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


11 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
LCGD-1k Load Cell Test – No
Load - 23Jul01
3100 SEMICon-West01
MiniEnvironment Crate
Load Cell

Lift Truck

13.65 Vdc Excitation


NO Load OutPut
Power Source
Signal (mVdc)

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


12 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
LCGD-1k Load Cell Test – Full
Load - 23Jul01
3100 SEMICon-West01
MiniEnvironment Crate Load Cell

Lift Truck

13.65 Vdc Excitation


Loaded OutPut Signal (mVdc):
Power Source
8.8 mV•(50lb/mV)  440 lbs

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


13 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
XY CG Calc
 Measure With Load
Cells
• Total SubSytem Weight
• Reaction loads at All Floor
Contact Points
 Calc using RA & RB

 M 0  W  L  Y1  R L
B A

 M 0  W  Y 1  R L
A B

 Solve for W and Y1


• Check W by

F z  0  W  R A  RB

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


14 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Vertical CG (z-CoOrd)
Determination
After Before



Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


15 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Vertical CG Determination
 Use XY CG Results
 TIP System, and Measure Angle with
Digital Protractor
 Note that for Higher CG, the Restoring Lever
Arm is Shortened More
 Working the Geometry, and Doing the Math
Find for Small Tilt Angles :
 RB ,after  xcg
 A
M  0  z cg   1 
tan     RB ,before 

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


16 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00 S2-§19
Seismic Protection
Bruce Mayer, PE
Dir. System Engineering
19Feb02 EarthQuake
– Magnitude
8.0
– Kurile Islands
– 03Dec1995

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


17 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00 Seismic Protection Analysis Plan
 Measure/Calc Weight and Center of Gravity
 Consult S2/§19 for Lateral Loading Criteria (0.63g)
 Consult Mechanical Design Drawing for Seismic
Structural-Element Location & Configuration
 Use Newtonian Vector Mechanics to Determine
Force & Moment Loads
 Use Solid-Mechanics Analysis to Determine
Fastener (Bolt) Stresses
 Use Mechanical-Engineering &
Materials Properties to determine
Factors of Safety
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
18 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
BMayer

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


19 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00 S2Testing: Tatsuno Japan, Dec01

S2-0200 Te
st System
AL3120F, s
/n 111001

3x00_S2S8_Tatsuno_PhotoDoc_0112.ppt

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


20 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00 Seismic
Loading & Geometry

BMayer

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


21 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Loading Geometry Detail

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


22 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Leg Loading & Ctr of Gravity
Test Apparatus

Load Cell at
Each Level-Leg

Jack to Tilt
Frame Unit

P7310022a_mm_tilt_full.JPG

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


23 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Center of Gravity Tilt-Testing: Before

Digital
Protractor
P7310050_Ul_gage_before.JPG

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


24 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Center of Gravity Tilt-Testing:
After

Digital
Protractor

P7310055_me_GageAfter.JPG

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


25 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
OverTurning Analysis
 Analysis Parameters:
1. Worst Case → SHORTEST Restoring-Moment
Lever-Arm
– Lever Arms= 582mm, 710mm, 776mm (see slides 4&5)
2. Vertical (resisting/restoring) Acceleration of 0.85g
per SEMI S2 §19.2.4
3. Horizontal (overturning) Acceleration for non-HPM
equipment of 0.63g per §19.2.2
 Results → Safe From Overturning WithOUT
Restraints (but not by much!)
Pivot Axis OverTurning Restoring Factor of
Line Direction Moment (N-m) Moment (N-m) Safety
R-S Y 6884 6966 1.01
P-Q X 6884 8504 1.24
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
26 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00_Seismic_Analysis_0202.xls
Bracket Stress
Analysis
 Analysis Parameters 2.22 kN
1. Assume Failure Point
at M6 or M10 Bolts
2. FOUR (4) Angle Brackets With
a total of 8 Connecting & Anchor Bolts, Resist Shear
3. Two Bolts Per Point, Each Bolt Bears 50% of Load
4. Bolt Axial-PreLoad is negligible (Snug-Fit)
5. Shear Load Per Restraint Point = 500lb/2.22kN
6. Use Von Mises Yield Criteria: Ssy = 0.577Sy
 Results Bolt Bolt Ssy Load Stress,  Factor of
Size & Fcn Material (MPa) (MPa) Safety
M6 Connector SS-304 139.1 13.84 10.1
M10 Anchor SS-304 139.1 4.74 29.4
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
27 3x00_Seismic_Analysis_0202.xls BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
3x00 S2-§19
- Appendix A -
R5-1: Seismic
Protection CheckList

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


28 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
X See Analysis By B. Mayer PE: file
3x00_Seismic_Analysis_0202.xls

X Factor of Safety 10x for Shear-Load

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


29 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
S2-0200, §19 R5-1: Seismic
Protection CheckList cont.1

X Anchors are well secured, and system


is connected by Flexible Electrical &
CDA conduits

X FrameWork is Rigid Relative to Module


Weight Given 0.63g acceleration

X FrameWork is Rigid Relative to Module


Weight Given 0.63g acceleration

X Customer Supplied M10 Floor Anchors


Should have Need Pull-Out Rating 1.1
kN (250 lb) Ref: ASTM Standard E 488

X NO attached Equipment

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


30 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
S2-0200, §19 R5-1: Seismic
Protection CheckList cont.2

X No Large and Brittle Components

NOT APPLICABLE by Q.B3

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


31 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
S2-0200, §19 R5-1: Seismic
Protection CheckList cont.3

X No Hazardous Piping. The CDAir piping


is flex-line

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


32 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
S2-0200, §19 R5-1: Seismic
Protection CheckList cont.4

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


33 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
OLYMPUS
Integrated Technologies America, Inc.

3x00 S2-§19
- Appendix B -
Anchor-Bolt
PullOut Ratings
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
34 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
B. Mayer Research: 1911 25-Jul-01
 Ref: http://www.powers.com/manual/23pb.htm
• 23.7 Performance Data
Testing conducted according to ASTM Standard E
488. Ultimate Load Capacities - Carbon Steel
Power-Bolt™

Guide 2,000 psi Concrete 4,000 psi Concrete 6,000 psi Concrete
Anchor Embed. Torque Tension Shear Tension Shear Tension Shear
Size Depth (ft-lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.) (lbs.)
5/16"~ M8 2" 15 2,640 3,280 3,120 4,230 3,270 4,400
5/16"~ M8 3" 15 3,280 4,240 3,780 5,380 4,260 5,380
3/8"~M10 2-1/2" 35 5,200 7,270 5,590 8,155 6,270 8,265
3/8"~M10 3-1/2" 35 5,585 8,525 6,150 8,770 7,550 9,055
1/2" ~ M12 3" 60 7,325 10,150 9,780 10,690 10,545 12,005
1/2" ~ M12 5" 60 8,060 12,930 10,855 14,740 11,460 14,435

Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE


35 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
OLYMPUS
Integrated Technologies America, Inc.

3x00 S2-§19
- Appendix C -
Engineering
Mechanics Analsysis
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
36 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
37 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
38 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
39 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
40 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt
Engineering-36: Engineering Mechanics - Statics Bruce Mayer, PE
41 BMayer@ChabotCollege.edu • ENGR-36_Lec-28_Application_Sesimic-Analysis.ppt

You might also like