Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exchange Rate Arrangments and Prediction
Exchange Rate Arrangments and Prediction
1
Various Exchange Rate Arrangements
Independent Floating
Allowing market forces to determine their currency’s value. Examples:
U.S., Japan, U.K., Canada, …
Managed Floating
Combining government intervention with market forces to set exchange
rates. Examples: China, India, Russia, …
Currency Board Arrangement
pegged to another currency (usually $ or €), and exchange rates only vary
within the predetermined limits. Examples: Hong Kong, Estonia
Monetary Union Arrangement
the country belongs to a currency union in which the same currency is
shared by the union members. Examples: euro zone member countries
2
Independent Floating:
EUR vs. USD
5
Currency Board Arrangement:
USD vs. HKD
6
Managed Floating vs. Currency Board
The biggest difference between managed floating
and currency board is that under the former
arrangement there is no preannounced path for
the exchange rates, while under the latter
arrangement, the government typically pre-
specifies a range under which its currency value
can fluctuate.
7
Currency Board Arrangement
in Hong Kong
Banknotes in Hong Kong are issued by the three note-
issuing banks (NIBs): HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank,
and Bank of China (HK).
When the three NIBs issue banknotes, they are required to
submit US dollars (at HK$7.80 = US$1) to the Hong
Kong monetary authority (HKMA) for the account of the
Exchange Fund in return for Certificates of Indebtedness
The US dollar exchanges are kept as Hong Kong's
Exchange Fund, which is among the largest official
reserves in the world.
8
Currency Board Arrangement
in Hong Kong
The HKMA operates Convertibility Undertakings
on both the strong side and the weak side of the
linked rate of 7.80
Under the strong-side where the exchange rate rises
beyond HK$7.75 = US$1, the HKMA will buy US$
and sell HK$ to keep the exchange rate at 7.75.
Under the weak-side where the exchange rate drops
beyond HK$7.85 = US$1, the HKMA will sell US$
and buy HK$ to keep the exchange rate at 7.85.
9
Euro and the Monetary Union Arrangement
On January 1, 1999, 11 European Union (EU) members
adopted a common currency called the euro, voluntarily
giving up their monetary sovereignty. Together with the
launch of euro, European Monetary Union (EMU), was
also created.
For countries within the Euro zone, their exchange rates
are trivially fixed at one (why?).
Fixed exchange rate never changes. This is in contrast to the
currency board arrangement which still allows for variations.
10
Euro Zone
11
Different Denominations of the Euro
Notes and Coins
The euro is divided into 100 cents, just like the
U.S. dollar.
There are 7 euro notes and 8 euro coins.
€500, €200, €100, €50, €20, €10, and €5.
The coins are: 2 euro, 1 euro, 50 euro cent, 20
euro cent, 10, euro cent, 5 euro cent, 2 euro cent,
and 1 euro cent.
12
The European Central Bank
13
The Prospects of the Euro
Will the euro become a global currency rivaling
the U.S. dollar?
The U.S. dollar has been the dominant global
currency since WWI because dollar is backed by
The sheer size of the U.S economy
Relatively sound monetary policy of the Federal
Reserve.
14
The Prospects of the Euro
Macroeconomic Data for Major Economies in 2005
Economy Population GDP World International Annual
(Million) ($ Billion) Trade Bonds Inflation
Share Outstanding
($ Billion)
U.S. 294.0 10,951 17.9 3,073 2.2%
%
Euro Zone 306.3 7,745 15.7 5,002 2.3%
%
Japan 127.7 3,625 6.6% 269.6 -0.6%
U.K. 59.3 1,774 5.6% 1,134 2.1%
15
Floating vs. Fixed
Exchange Rate Arrangements
So far we’ve seen various exchange rate
arrangement: independent floating, managed
floating, currency board, and fixed, which go
from the one extreme to the other.
A fundamental question remains: why some
countries allow their currencies to float while the
other countries prefer to fix their currency values?
16
Floating vs. Fixed
Exchange Rate Arrangements
Arguments in favor of floating exchange rate
arrangements:
Easier adjustments of imbalances in international
payments.
Maintaining the national policy autonomy so that the
government can use its monetary and fiscal policies to
address particular domestic economic issues.
17
Imbalance in International Payments
Suppose that at the current exchange rate of $1.4
for £1 the U.S. is running BOP deficit, whereas
the U.K. is running BOP surplus.
With floating rate arrangement, the imbalance can
be adjusted automatically.
With fixed rate arrangement, on the other hand,
the U.S. government has to take policy actions to
correct its BOP disequilibrium.
18
Imbalance in International Payments
Supply
Dollar price per £
(exchange rate)
(S)
Demand
$1.40 (D)
Excessive
demand of pound
S D Q of £
19
Adjustment under the Floating
Exchange Rate arrangement
Supply
Dollar price per £
(exchange rate)
(S)
$1.60
Pound appreciates Demand
$1.40 (floating regime) (D)
Demand (D*)
D=S Q of £
20
Adjustment under the Fixed
Exchange Rate Arrangement
Supply
Dollar price per £
Contractionary
(exchange rate)
policies (S)
(fixed regime)
Demand
$1.40 (D)
Demand (D*)
D* = S Q of £
21
National Policy Autonomy
By adopting the fixed exchange rate
arrangements, a country has to give up part or
even all of its monetary policy autonomy. Hence,
the country can no longer effectively address the
domestic economic issues.
22
National Policy Autonomy:
Asymmetric Shocks
Consider Finland, a country that heavily depend on the
paper and pulp industries. Hence, a sudden drop in world
paper and pulp prices could severely hurt the Finnish
economy but affect other euro zone countries little.
Such a shock is called the asymmetric shock.
23
National Policy Autonomy:
Asymmetric Shocks
Because Finland has joined the euro zone, the country
no longer has these policy options at its disposal.
Worse, European Central Bank (ECB) may even
decide to increase the common interest rate because
the rest part of the euro zone is experiencing
inflation.
Since the shock is asymmetric, we might be witnessing
overheated economies in the other euro zone countries while
Finland is experiencing a serious recession.
24
Floating vs. Fixed
Exchange Rate Arrangements
Arguments in favor of fixed exchange rate
arrangements:
The reduction and even elimination of the foreign
exchange risks can save transaction costs, foster cross-
border trades, and attract foreign capitals, all of which
are beneficial to the economic growth of a country.
25
Fixed Exchange Rate Arrangements
in the Euro Zone
By adopting a single currency,
Companies that used to hedge exchange risk will save
hedging costs.
intra-euro zone travel, trades and investments are promoted.
Price becomes more transparent, and consumers can benefit
from comparison shopping.
As the result, the efficiency and the competitiveness of
the euro zone economy are greatly enhanced.
26
Which Exchange Rate Arrangement?
Back to previous question. Which exchange rate
arrangement should a country adopt?
For countries such as the U.S. and Japan, they put their
policy autonomy as the priority, and they also prefer easier
external adjustments of their BOP. Hence, they choose to
adopt floating exchange rates
The euro zone countries are instead committed to promoting
financial, economic, and even political integration among
each other. As result, they choose to adopt fixed exchange
rates at the sacrifices of their policy independences.
27
Optimum Currency Areas (Deeper Issue)
Not every country is suitable for adopting the fixed
exchange rate arrangement, even if it wants to.
According to the theory of optimum currency areas
conceived by Mundell in 1960, two countries or regions
(essentially) adopting the same currency should have high
degrees of factor (i.e., capital and labor) mobility between
each other.
A high degree of factor mobility would provide an adjustment in
response to country-specific shocks.
28
Optimum Currency Areas (Deeper Issue)
For example, the 50 states within the U.S. approximates
an optimum currency area, because the degree of capital
and labor mobility within the U.S. is high.
For example, when oil prices jumped up in the 1970s, many
workers moved from oil-consuming regions such as New England
which suffered a severe recession to Texas, a major oil-producing
state, which experienced a major boom.
On the other hand, Finland does not seem to satisfy the
conditions adopting Euro.
Upon the asymmetric shocks, it is hard for workers in Finland to
move to, for example, Germany or France.
29
Optimum Currency Areas (Deeper Issue)
Using the theory of optimum currency areas, let’s
consider again the exchange rate arrangement in HK.
HKD is largely fixed to the USD.
Question: do HK and the U.S. have labor and capital
mobility between each other?
Recently, some economists suggest HKD being
pegged to CNY instead, or even to abolish HKD and
just use CNY in HK.
This is an open question, which is still under discussion.
30
Attributes of the “Ideal” Arrangement
Exchange rate stability – the value of the currency would be
fixed in relationship to other currencies so that traders and
investors have no concerns about foreign exchange risks
Full financial integration – complete freedom of capital flows
would be allowed, so that resources can be optimally allocated
on the global basis.
Monetary independence – domestic monetary and interest rate
policies would be set by each individual country to pursue
desired national economic policies
31
The Impossible Trinity
34
Analysis of the China Case
By applying the impossible trinity:
Like many other countries, China is encouraging
36
Approaches on Forecasting
Exchange Rates
Efficient Markets Approach
Fundamental Approach
Parity Conditions
Balance of Payments
Monetary Approach
Technical Approach
37
Efficient Markets Approach
Financial Markets are efficient if prices reflect all
available and relevant information. If so, exchange
rates will only change when new information arrives.
Mathematically, efficient market approach is usually
expressed as:
St E ( St 1 | I t )
Intuitively, based on the currently available information, a
fund manager does not know in which direction the future
exchange rate will differ from today’s exchange rate.
38
Efficient Markets Approach
The relationship
St E ( St 1 | I t )
is sometimes called the random walk hypothesis,
suggesting that today’s rate is the unbiased predictor of
tomorrow’s rate.
Recall in chapter 3, we talked about a theory in which
forward rate is the unbiased predictor of the future
exchange rate based on the available information if the
markets are efficient:
Ft ,t 1 E ( St 1 | I t )
39
Spot Rate vs. Forward Rate as the Predictor
Recall 1 i$
Ft ,t 1 St
1 i£
To the extent that interest rates are different between the
two countries, the forward exchange rate will differ from
the current spot exchange rate.
Those who subscribe to the efficient market hypothesis
may predict the future exchange rate using either Ft ,t 1 or
St . A natural question: which one is better?
40
Spot Rate vs. Forward Rate as the Predictor
Agmon and Amihud (1981) compared the
performance of the forward rate with that of the
random walk model in which current spot rate is used
as the predictor of the future spot rate.
They found that in the short run, forward rate failed to
outperform the random walk model.
The two prediction models that are based on the efficient
market hypothesis registered largely comparable
performances for short-run predictions!
41
Efficient Markets Approach
Predicting the exchange rates using the efficient
market approach has two advantages:
The market data are publicly available.
The market-based forecasts are hard to be outperformed
unless forecaster has access to private information that
is not yet reflected in the current exchange rate.
42
Fundamental Approach
The fundamental approach to exchange rate forecasting
uses various models/ methods such as:
the international parity conditions that integrate exchange rates with
inflation and interest rates
the relations between a country’s balance of payments and the level of
its exchange rate
The monetary method belongs to the fundamental approach
which suggests that the exchange rate is determined by
three independent (explanatory) variables: i) relative
money supplies; ii) relative velocity of monies; iii) relative
outputs.
43
Monetary Method
One can formulate the monetary method in the following empirical
form:
s 1 (m m* ) 2 (v v* ) 3 ( y * y ) u
where:
s natural logarithm of the spot exchange rate
m m* natural logarithm of domestic/foreign money supply
v v* natural logarithm of domestic/foreign velocity of money
y* y natural logarithm of foreign/domestic output
u random error term, with mean zero
, ' s model parameters
44
Monetary Method
Generating forecasts involve:
step 1: Estimate the model parameters such as and
s
m m*
using the past realizations of and the explanatory
variables such as
step 2: Estimate the future values of the explanatory
variables
step 3: Substitute estimates in step1&2 into the model to
develop forecasts of the future spot rates
45
Monetary Method
The monetary method has three main difficulties
Forecasting the explanatory variables may not be
over time.
the model itself can be mis-specified.
47
Technical Approach
LMA D
SMA
A
tA tD
One can forecast exchange rate movement based on the
crossover of the moving average.
48
Technical Approach
The technical approach is based upon the premise
that history repeats itself, which is at odds with
the random walk hypothesis (RWH).
The RWH states that the incremental changes in the
exchange rate will be independent of the past history of
the exchange rate.
Technically oriented traders tend to view price patterns
as repetitive but with an element of chaos.
49
Technical Approach
While academic studies tend to discredit its
validity, the technical approach is still widely used
If enough traders use technical analysis, the predictions
based on it can become self-fulfilling to some extent.
The technical approach is often used together with the
fundamental approach, and it is far easier to hold a
technical position on both emotional and intellectual
grounds if the fundamental picture also supports your
position.
50
Long-Term Trends
vs. Short-Term Noise
Decades of empirical studies show that in the long run,
exchange rates do adhere to the fundamental principles
and theories such as the international parity conditions –
fundamentals do apply in the long term :
There exists something of a fundamental equilibrium path for a
currency’s value
In the short and the medium term, however, a variety of
random events, institutional frictions, and technical factors
may cause currency values to deviate significantly from
their long term fundamental path – this is sometimes
referred to as noise
51
Long-Term Trends
vs. Short-Term Noise
Foreign currency per
unit of domestic currency
Fundamental
Occasional large events may Equilibrium
drive the exchange rate out of Path
the ranges of the long-term path
52
Time
Long-Term Trends
vs. Short-Term Noise
Currency markets do not pay much attention to
the theories on a day-to-day basis:
In the short run, the arrivals of information and
investors’ sentiment, both of which are unpredictable,
play important roles in the exchange rate determination.
One example to illustrate the short term chaos
over the exchange rate dynamics is the
phenomenon known as overshooting.
53
Exchange Rate Dynamics: Overshooting
If the U.S. Federal Reserve were to announce a change in its monetary policy, which in the long
run should drive the exchange rate from S0 to S1 based on IRP.
Spot Dollar
Exchange Rate S2
Overshooting
S1
S0
time
t1 t2
The Fed announces a monetary policy change at time t1. Instead of driving the dollar exchange rate from
S0 to S1 as is predicted by IRP, however, the exchange rate over-adjusted to S2. Over the next few weeks,
(from t1 to t 2 ), exchange rate gradually adjusts back to S1. Both the magnitude of over-adjustment and
the time that it takes to adjust back are unpredictable.
54
Forecasting in Practice
Forecast Period Regime Recommended Forecast Methods
55
55
Forecasting in Practice
Forecast Period Regime Recommended Forecast Methods
56
56
Forecasting in Practice
Forecast Period Regime Recommended Forecast Methods
57
57
Performance of the Forecasters
Many firms and investors subscribe to professional
forecasting services for a fee. A question: in the short run,
can professional forecasters outperform the market?
Substantial variations in the performance records across individual
services (e.g., page 153)
As a whole, forecasters do not perform a better job of forecasting
future exchange rates than the forward rate,
The founder of Forbes Magazine once said:
“You can make more money by selling financial advice
than by following it.”
58