Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Simon Prüller
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben
Presentation Overview
WAAM Introduction
Material SS316L
Experimental procedure
FEM-Simulation of WAAM Productionprocess
Results and Comparison between FEM-
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 2
WAAM-Process
1) CAD
2) Slicing -> Robotic Welding Program
3) 3D-Scanning
4) Finishing
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 3
WAAM-What parts have potential for
WAAM?
Surface roughness requires machining
finishing (Contact ratio)
Partgeometrie not to complex
Big Dimensions are producible
Lightweight Constructions
Prototypes
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 4
WAAM-What parts have potential for
WAAM?
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 5
Advantage of WAAM
Material Usage
Flexible in Production
Fastest Additive Manufacturing Process
for metals
25kg WAAM vs. 18kg finished Part vs. 85kg Part before Milling
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 6
SS316L
Austenitic Stainless Steel
Resistance against corrosion
Chemical Componenets in %
More Distortion
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben SS316L 7
Welding of SS316L
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben SS316L 8
Physical Properties for FEM
Heat Conductivity
Thermal Expansion
Young Modulus
Heat Capacity
Flow Stress for
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben SS316L 9
Experimental-Finding Weldparameter
1 2 3 4
Current
Voltage
Power
Weldspeed
Wirefitrate
Gas
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-Experimental 10
WAAM-Experimental L10S3
Difference between no Holding Time and 2
min Holding Time every Layer
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-Experimental 11
WAAM-Experimental L10S3
Good Surface Quality
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-Experimental 12
WAAM-Thermocouple
Comparison between two different
Datalogger
Kyowa and Pico
No temperature
calibration
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-Experimental 13
WAAM-Measuring Distortion
Coordinate Measuring Machine
Same Clamping as in the FEM-Simulation
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-Experimental 14
FEM – Why FEM-Simulation of WAAM
Production Process?
Calculate the distortion
Calculate the heat distribution
Calculate the residual stress
Try Production Parameters
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 15
FEM-WAAM Model
Goal FEM-Modell of
10 Layers 3 String
3 Main Parts
(Table,Plate,Weldfiller)
Alternating Welding-
Direction
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 16
FEM-Calculation Time
Large Number of Inkrements
◦ Long Production Time
◦ Small Inkrement Steps caused by large Temperature
Gradient
Large Number of Elements in the Simulation
◦ Long Calculation Time for every Inkrement
Data Picking
◦ Large Number of Inkrements -> very Long Time for
Data Picking
◦ Resultfile up to 50GB
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 17
FEM-Different Elementsize
Testing
Method for reducing Calculation Time
3 Different Models Elementsize Small (1mm)
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 18
FEM-Calculation Time Comparsion
Blue (Big Elementsize)
Red (Adaptive Meshing)
Green (Small Elementsize)
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 19
FEM-Results different Elementsize
Temperature Distribution almost similiar
Big Difference in residual Stress for Adaptive
Meshing
◦ Red (adaptive M.) Blue (Big E.) Green (Small E.)
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 20
FEM-Results different Elementsize
Big Difference in Distortion for Adaptive M.
Big and Small Elements Distortion almost
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 21
FEM-Elementsize Resüme
Big Advantage in shorter Calculationtime for
larger Elements
Results for different Elementsize almost
similiar
Big Differenz for residual Stress and
2mm
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 22
FEM-Elementgeometrie
Near the Heat Source -> symetric
With more distance to the heat source ->
Welddirection
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 23
FEM-Heat Source Comparison
Goldak double Ellipse
Rectangular Heat Source with Constant Heat
◦ Heat Distribution
◦ Residual Stress
◦ Distortion
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 24
FEM- Goldak Double Ellipse
Standard Heat Source for Arc-Welding
Simulation
Goldak Distribution
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 25
FEM-Rectangular Heat Source
Realised with Subroutine
Constant Heat Distrubtion in the Rectangular
Volume
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 26
FEM-Heat Source Comparison
Model
WAAM 3 Layers 3 Strings
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 27
FEM- Heat Source Comparison Result
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 28
FEM- Heat Source Comparison Result
Heat distribution in three different nodes
◦ Orange
Rectangular
◦ Blue
Goldak
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 29
FEM- Heat Source Comparison Result
Residual Stress Comparison over
SimulationTime
◦ Blue
Goldak
◦ Orange
Rectangular
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 30
FEM-Boundary Conditions
Clamping
◦ During Production
◦ For measuring the distortion
Face Film
◦ For every Layer
◦ Also during Cooldown
Weld Flux
◦ Higher weldspeed when heat source entering
weldfiller
◦ Goldak Double Ellipse as Heat Source
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 31
FEM-Weldspeed
Temperature increases to much when the
heat source entering the weldfiller
Whole Power input is divided on less nodes
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM Introduction 32
FEM-Weldspeed
Blue
◦ Const. Weldsp.
Orange
◦ Var. Weldspeed
Weldspeed
Table for every
Weldstring
Weldspeed [mm/s]
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 33
FEM-Results L10S3
Temperature Distribution
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 34
FEM-Results L10S3
Temperature Distribution for the first 3
Layers in the heat effecting zone
Temperature
is increasing
over 150°C
after the first
Layer
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 35
FEM-Results L10S3
Distortion in Y-Direction
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-FEM 36
Comparison, FEM and WAAM-Part
Characteristic of Distortion pretty much the
same
Distortion in Y-Direction Distortion in Y-Direction
FEM-Simulation WAAM-Part
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben Comparison 37
Comparison, FEM and WAAM-Part
Distortion of WAAM-Part around 24,5 % more
than the Distortion of the Simulation
Above Edge in Length
Under Edge in Width
◦ Orange WAAM-Part
◦ Blue FEM-Simulation
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben Comparison 38
Comparison Heat Distribution
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben Comparison 39
Outlook
New Measurements with Thermocouple with
exact holding time (Calibration)
Investigation on microstructure for L10S3
(MUL)
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben Outlook 40
GIF-WAAM L10S3 FEM-Simulation
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben WAAM-GIF 41
Thank you!
Questions?
Email:
Simon.Prueller@stud.unileoben.ac.at
© Simon Prüller
Montanuniversität Leoben Outlook 42