You are on page 1of 13

Interim Policy Guidelines for

Assessment and Grading in Light of


the Basic Education Learning
Continuity Plan
DepEd Order No. 31 s. 2020
Guiding Principles

1. Assessment should be holistic and authentic in capturing attainment of


the most essential learning competencies;
2. Assessment is integral for understanding student learning and
development;
3. A variety of assessment strategies is necessary, with formative
assessment taking priority to inform teaching and promote growth and
mastery;
4. Assessment and feedback should be a shared responsibility among
teachers, learners and their families; and
5. Assessment and grading should have a positive impact on learning.
Definition of Terms

Classroom Assessment is an ongoing process of identifying, gathering,


organizing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative information about
what learners know and can do.

Formative Assessment is a process that involves teachers using evidence


about what learners know and can do to inform and improve their teaching.
This process, through the teacher’s immediate feedback, enables students
to take responsibility for their own learning and identify areas where they
do well and where they need help.
Definition of Terms

Summative Assessment is an assessment that is usually administered


toward the end of a learning period to measure the extent to which the
learners have mastered the essential learning competencies, the results of
which are recorded and are used to report the learner’s achievement.

Grading is the way of reporting assessment data by assigning a value to


the results as a record of students' ability, achievement, or progress
(Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2020).
Roles and Responsibilities

a. Teachers. For this school year, particular focus will be given to the
following:
i.Designing the assessment to allow for flexibility in multiple
modalities;
ii.Communicating to learners and parents/guardians the design and
standards for grading the assessment;
iii.Setting up mechanisms to monitor and record progress remotely;
iv.Giving timely, constructive, and relevant feedback; and
v.Facilitating remediation for learners who need further guidance.
Roles and Responsibilities
b. Learners. Learners are expected to be proactive in updating their
teacher of their situation, progress and challenges encountered. A non-
mandatory Self-Monitoring Tool (see Annex E) may be accomplished
independently or with the assistance of their parent/guardian, if necessary.
It is NOT required to accomplish the self-monitoring tool, but its usage is
highly recommended to keep track of learners’ academic progress.
c. Parents and guardians. DepEd aims to develop independent learners
who can study and work on the assessments on their own.
i. Communicating with the teacher to give updates on their child’s
situation, progress, and challenges encountered; and
ii. Guiding their children in accomplishing the assessment tasks and/or
monitoring tools designed by their teacher.
4 Steps to be considered

1. Planning the assessment


2. Conducting assessment remotely
3. Feedback and remediation
4. Grading and promotion
Table 1: Weight Distribution of the Summative Assessment Components per
Learning Area for Grade 1 to Grade 10

Weights
Assessment Components

Languages/AP/EsP Science/Math MAPEH/EPP/TLE


Written Works 40% 50% 30%
Performance Tasks 60% 50% 70%
Table 2: Weight Distribution of the Summative Assessment Components
for Senior High School

  Technical/Vocational and Livelihood


Academic Track (TVL)/Sports/Arts and
Design Tracks

   
Core
Assessment Components Work Immersion/Research/ All Other Work Immersion/ Research
Subjects All Other Subjects Business Enterprise Simulation/ Exhibit/
Exhibit/Performance Subjects Performance

Written Works 40% 40% 50% 30%


Performance
Tasks 60% 60% 50% 70%
Table 3: Sample Computation of Written Works and Performance Tasks in
Languages/AP/EsP for Grade 1 to Grade 10 and SHS Core Subjects

  Written Works (40%) Performance Tasks (60%)


Initial Quarterly
1 2 3 4 Total PS WA 1 2 3 4 Total PS WA Grade Grade
 

Highest                                
Possible
Score 20 25 20 20 85 100 40% 15 15 25 20 75 100 60% 100 100

Learner A 18 22 20 17 77 91 36.4% 12 13 19 15 56 75 45% 81.4 88


Table 4: Sample Computation of Written Works and Performance Tasks in
Math/Science for Grade 1 to Grade 10

  Written Works (50%) Performance Tasks (50%)


Initial Quarterly
Grade Grade
  1 2 3 4 Total PS WA 1 2 3 4 Total PS WA

Highest                                
Possible
Score 20 25 20 20 85 100 50% 15 15 25 20 75 100 50% 100 100

Learner 18 22 20 17 77 91 45.5% 12 13 19 15 56 75 37.5% 83 89


A
Table 5: Sample Computation of Written Works and Performance Tasks in MAPEH/EPP/TLE for Grade 1 to Grade 10

  Written Works (30%) Performance Tasks (70%)


Initial Quarterly
Grade Grade
  1 2 3 4 Total PS WA 1 2 3 4 Total PS WA

Highest                                
Possible
Score 20 25 20 20 85 100 30% 15 15 25 20 75 100 70% 100 100

Learner A 18 22 20 17 77 91 27.3% 12 13 19 15 56 75 52.5% 79.8 87


Annexes

You might also like