SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI STOREY

BUILDING IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA

USING STAAD PRO

Under the guidance of

Mr. M.Kalyan
Assistant Professor
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Presented By
Y.Abhinav – 160116732074
Y.Pavan Kalyan – 160116732092
N.Raj Kumar - 160116732313
 ABSTRACT
1) In this project we considered a 3D RCC frame with dimensions of 4 bays
@ 5m in x- axis and 4 bays@ 5m in z- axis.
2) The materials were specified and cross sections of the beam and column
members were assigned.
3) The structure was subjected to self weight, live load and seismic loads
under the load case details of STAAD Pro.
4) The design involves load calculations manually and analyzing the whole
structure by STAAD Pro.
5) The design method used in STAAD Pro analysis is Limit State design
confirming to Indian Standard Code of practice (IS 456:2000).
6) Seismic load calculations were done following IS 1893:2016.
7) Then STAAD Pro was used to analyze the structure, design the members
and study the bending moment and shear force values generated with
diagrams.
AIM:-
The aim of the project work is to perform seismic analysis and design of 9
storey building in different seismic zones of India
by equivalent static method for different load combinations using STAAD
Pro software.

OBJECTIVE:-
1) To compare and analyze the variation of design base shear, bending
moment and shear force in Seismic zones:V,IV,III,II.
2) To study reactions, shear forces, bending moment, seismic forces during
analysis.
3) To perform seismic analysis of 9 storey RC building using equivalent
static method.
PLAN CONSIDERED:-

• Cross section of beams = 0.3×0.5m

• Cross section of columns = 0.75×0.75m
• Slab thickness = 150 mm
• Wall thickness = 230 mm
• Parapet wall thickness = 115 mm
MATERIAL DETAILS –
Concrete details – M30
Steel grade – Fe-415

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN:-

• Good structural configuration

• Lateral strength
• Adequate stifness
• Good ductility
SEISMIC ANALYSIS METHODS:-
For determination of seismic responses it is necessary to carry out seismic
analysis.
Structural analysis methods can be mainly divided into four categories –
1) Linear static analysis –
i. This method is also known as equivalent static analysis.
ii. This procedure does not require dynamic analysis it accounts for dynamic
analysis in an approximate manner.
iii. Firstly, the design base shear is calculated for entire building and it is then
distributed along the height of the building.

2) Non linear static analysis –

iv. Non linear static analysis is also known as pushover analysis.
v. This procedure is mainly used to estimate the strength and drift capacity
of structure.
vi. The generation of base shear, control node displacement curve and
pushover or capacity curve is the outcome of this analysis.
3) Linear dynamic analysis:-
i. Response spectrum method is a linear dynamic analysis method.
ii. In this method peak response of structure during an earthquake is
obtained directly from the earthquake response.
iii. In this method multiple mode shapes of building are taken into account.
iv. Based on modal frequency and the modal mass for each mode of a
response then they are combined to provide an estimate of the total
response.

4) Nonlinear dynamic analysis:-

v. Nonlinear dynamic analysis is also referred as Time history analysis.
vi. To perform this analysis a representative earthquake time history data is
required for the structure being evaluated.
vii. Time history analysis is used to determine the seismic response of a
structure under dynamic loading for a representative earthquake.
LOADS CONSIDERED:-
1) Dead Loads – The first vertical load that is considered is dead load. Dead
loads are permanent loads which are transferred to structure throughout the
life span.

2) Live Loads – The second vertical load that is considered in design of

structure is imposed load. Live loads are either movable or moving loads
without any acceleration or any impact.

3) Earthquake Load --
i. This type of loads causes movement of foundation of structures.
ii. Three mutually perpendicular forces act on structure during an earthquake,
two horizontal forces which act in opposite direction and one vertical force
due to weight of structure.
METHODOLOGY

 MODELLING
 PROPERTIES
 SUPPORTS
 LOAD APPLICATIONS
 ANALYSIS
 DESIGN
 RESULTS
DEFINING SEISMIC PARAMETERS
BEAM AND COLUMN RESULTS
POST PROCESSING RESULTS

Bending in Z Shear in Y
PLOT SHOWING DESIGN BASE SHEAR VALUE IN DIFFERENT
SEISMIC ZONES OF INDIA

Base Shear (KN)

6000

5000

4000

Base shear (KN)

3000

2000

1000

0
Zone V Zone IV Zone III Zone II
 PLOT SHOWING MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT FOR BEAM 352
IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES
 

Bending Moment (KN-m)

400

350

300

250

Bending Moment(KN-m)
200

150

100

50

0
Zone V Zone IV Zone III Zone II
PLOT SHOWING MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE FOR BEAM 352 IN
DIFFERENT SEISMIC ZONES

Shear Force (KN)

200

180

160

140

120
Shear Force (KN)
100

80

60

40

20

0
Zone V Zone IV Zone III Zone II
PLOT SHOWING % STEEL IN COLUMN NO-188 IN DIFFERENT
SEISMIC ZONES

Steel %
1.4

1.2

0.8
Steel %

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
Zone V Zone IV Zone III Zone II
LITERATURE REVIEW OUTCOMES

• Mohan and Prabha

i. From their study the findings were equivalent static method can be
effectively used for symmetrical buildings.
ii. For higher and unsymmetrical buildings response spectrum method
should be used.
• Bagheri
i. The findings of their study were static approaches are more suitable for
simple, low to medium rise building.
• Nitin kumar
i. In their study the seismic zone was adopted as Zone IV.
ii. Response spectrum method gives valuable information during the periods
of earthquake.
iii. The equivalent lateral force method gives most conservative result relative
to the response spectrum method.
• Akash Panchal, Ravi Dwivedi
i. In their study they analyzed a G+6 existing RCC framed structure has
been analyzed and designed using STAAD Pro,
ii. The main objectives of the paper are to compare the variation of steel
percentage, maximum shear force and maximum bending moment in
different seismic zones if India.
iii. The findings of their study were the steel percentage, shear force, bending
moment increases from zone II to zone V.
CONCLUSION

 The 9 storey building has been analyzed and designed using STAAD
Pro.Seismic forces have been considered.
 From linear static analysis the base shear of structure increases from seismic
zone II to seismic zone V.
 The value of max bending moment (Mz) in beam-352 increases as we go to
higher seismic zones.
 The maximum shear force (Fy) value in beam-352 shows an increasing
trend as the seismic zone varies from II to V.
 In column number -188 the % steel varied from 1.28% to 0.88% from
seismic zone V to seismic zone II.
REFERENCES:-
1) Tejas Gorle, Shekhasingh Suryawanshi, Shubham Kedar, Dr B.V Khode -
“Seismic analysis of a multi-storey RCC frame building for different seismic
zones in Nagpur”.
2) Nitin kumar, Dharmendra Kushwaha, Madan Chandra Maurya, R.K Sharma –
“Comparitive study of equivalent lateral force method and response spectrum
method for OMRF multistory building”.
3) Samiksha Kumbhare, Riya Badole, Vikas Mate, Sahil Pathan – “Seismic analysis
of multistory (G+7) building using Staad Pro and manually”.
4) Sagar Thakur, Diksha Mate, Amit Moundekar – “Seismic analysis of building
using Staad Pro”.
5) Bagheri – “Comparative study of static and dynamic analysis”
6) Bureau of Indian Standards, IS-875 (Part 1) 1987, Dead loads on buildings and
structures.
7) Bureau of Indian Standards, IS-875 (Part 2) 1987, Live loads on buildings and
structures.
8) Bureau of Indian Standards, IS-875 (Part 5) 1987, Load combination details.
9) Bureau of Indian Standards, IS-1893 (Part 1) – 2016, Criteria for Earthquake
resistant design of structures.
10) Bureau of Indian Standards, IS-456:2000 – Plain and reinforced concrete code of
practice.