You are on page 1of 14

MICRO- AND MACRO-PERSPECTIVES

ON STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT
TO DIGITAL AND NON-DIGITAL LEARNING SOURCES

By,
Intan Ristiani
Siliwangi University
Appropriate
Instructional Media

Experiences
Introduction
21st Century Learning

Current Perspective

The Utilization of Instructional


Media

Digital Non-digital
Current Study
 Web 2.0 Tools in Language Teaching: What Do
Student Teachers Think? (Cephe and Cem, 2012)
 Assessing ELT Pre-Service Teachers via Web 2.0
Tools: Perceptions toward Traditional,Online and
Alternative Assessment (Cirit, 2015)
 Implementing Mobile Language Learning
Technologies in Japan. McCarty, S. (2017)
Aims
IMPACT

Engagement

 Students’ Perspective

Students’ Perspective
Students’ Perspective

Instructional Media

Students’ Perspective
DIGITAL LEARNING SOURCES
DIGITAL LEARNING SOURCES
CALL and TELL
NON-DIGITAL LEARNING
SOURCES
ENGAGEMENT OF LEARNING
Methodology
Participants Research Method

104 4th grade students in one Exploratory survey research


of University in Indonesia

Data Collection Data Analysis

Online survey : Thematic analysis


-Questionnaire
-Interview
RESULT
Digital Learning Sources

Benefits Weaknesess

Spend quota data


Simple Untrustworthy link
Economize Addicted
Effective Make eyes irritated
Efficient Making dizzy
Many links
Up-to-date
Practical Increase knowledge
Enjoyable Can do discussion
Send file Can use everywhere
Voice note
Chat
Peer editing
Motivate
Engage
RESULT
Non-Digital Learning Sources

Benefits Weaknesess

Challenging Expensive
Can highlight Making confused
Can scratch/take notes Outdated
Hard to find
Boring
CONCLUSION

You might also like