Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
Science, Technology & Mathematics Department
Daraga, Albay
Biology
Researchers:
Baroso Angelica| Bembenuto Chrisjean| Lozano Earl John | Fernan Paz |
Rebancos, Jane Austin Lynn | BSED-SCI 3A Adviser: Dr. John Mark Mayor
BU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION | RESEARCH IN TEACHING SCIENCE
Introduction
This study intends to develop game-based formative assessments for Grade 11 Biology. This is to
provide alternative strategy for monitoring the understanding of students on concepts in Biology.
1. What formative assessments for Grade 11 General Biology 1 may be developed with the following
features:
a. Use of multimedia
b. Interactive?
2. What is the level of acceptability of the formative assessments as perceive by Biology Teachers in
terms of:
a. Accessibility
b. Usability
c. Validity?
d. Motivation
e. Engagement?
Baroso Angelica| Bembenuto Chrisjean| Lozano Earl John | Fernan Paz |
Rebancos, Jane Austin Lynn | BSED-SCI 3A
BU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION | RESEARCH IN TEACHING SCIENCE
• Science Teachers. This study will also be beneficial for science teachers, particularly the Biology
teachers, who generate formative assessments to track the academic progress of learners in Biology.
The game-based formative assessments will help the teachers to encourage participation and
competitiveness in the learning process especially in the distance learning with its appealing visual
activities and quizzes. Additionally, the results of the formative assessment will help the teachers to
assess the effectiveness of their instructions and pedagogy, wherein they can take necessary
adjustments and improvements to the latter that would supplement learners attain specified learning
goals.
• School Administrators. The findings of this study will also provide information and insights to the
school administrators regarding the importance of reinforcing effective formative assessment to
students. Through the results of this study, they can be informed of the enhancement that they can
make in the curriculum to better measure the strength and weaknesses of the students and to
strengthen their sense of accountability for their own learning.
Theoretical Paradigm
Conceptual Paradigm
Methodology
• For SOP 1, which is the development of formative assessments, the main tool is the game-based
platform, Kahoot. Moreover, the selected three learning competencies from the MELCs will be the
central focus of the formative assessments. The DepEd modules for these competencies will serve
as guides for formulating the formative questions. Also, to make the formative assessments
engaging, the researchers will choose relevant pictures and videos from the platform to be inserted
between questions. An opening slide which establishes and communicates the learning targets that
are to be gauged by the formative assessments will also be incorporated.
• For SOP 2, the necessary data for the level of acceptability of the outputs of this study will be
gathered using a researcher-made dichotomous checklist. It will contain statements classified under
the usability, accessibility, and validity of the developed game-based formative assessments
Baroso Angelica| Bembenuto Chrisjean| Lozano Earl John | Fernan Paz |
Rebancos, Jane Austin Lynn | BSED-SCI 3A
BU COLLEGE OF EDUCATION | RESEARCH IN TEACHING SCIENCE
Methodology
• For SOP 3, the researchers will implement the developed game-based formative assessments to Gr.
11 General Biology 1 students. To ensure familiarity of Kahoot, a video tutorial will be sent to them
together with the link or game pin of the quiz game. They will be instructed to play the game-based
formative assessments after they have finished their synchronous or asynchronous class discussion
on each of their first three topics for General Biology 1, which are about: (1) cell theory, (2) cell
structure and functions, and (3) prokaryotic vs. eukaryotic cells. After finishing each of the formative
assessments, its effects on the engagement and motivation of the Gr. 11 General Biology 1 students
will be determined using a survey questionnaire in a five-point Likert scale format. This questionnaire
will contain five items related to engagement and another five items related to motivation for a total of
ten questions. These questions will be adopted from the study of Wang and Lieberoth (2016) to
assure its validity.
Baroso Angelica| Bembenuto Chrisjean| Lozano Earl John | Fernan Paz |
Rebancos, Jane Austin Lynn | BSED-SCI 3A