Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 3 BITS-Pilani
Ba r r i e r s to C re a ti ve Th i n ki n g
Perceptual Emotional Blocks Cultural Blocks Intellectual Blocks Environmental
Blocks Blocks
Stereotyping Fear of risk taking Set of pattern Poor choice of Physical
problem-solving environment
language or problem
representation
Information Unease with chaos tradition bound Memory block Criticism
overload and are reluctant
to change
Limiting the Unable or unwilling Countries even Insufficient
problem to incubate new differ in their knowledge base
unnecessarily ideas attitudes toward
Fixation Motivation Incorrect information
Priming or
provision of cues
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 4 BITS-Pilani
C re a ti ve Th in ki n g M e th o d s
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 5 BITS-Pilani
I n t u i ti ve M e th o d s
• Brainstorming:
• Brainwriting:
• 6-3-5 Method:
• Affinity diagram
• Concept maps:
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 6 BITS-Pilani
M e t h o d s to i m p r o vin g b r a i n sto r m i n g s e ss io n s
• Take breaks
• Do not rush
• Stay persistent
• Blocking
• Collaborative fixation
• Evaluation apprehension
• Personality characteristics
• Social matching
• The affinity diagram is a business tool used to organize ideas and data.
• The tool is commonly used within project management and allows large numbers of ideas
stemming from brainstorming to be sorted into groups, based on their natural relationships, for
review and analysis.
• Functional decomposition:
• Morphological Method:
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 12 BITS-Pilani
F u n cti o n a l De co m p o si tio n a n d Sy n th e sis
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 13 BITS-Pilani
F u n cti o n a l De co m p o si tio n a n d Sy n th e sis
• “If one generate one idea it will probably be a poor idea; if one generates many ideas, one
good idea might exist for further development” (Ullman, 1992).
• The emphasis is on attaining a correct description of what the product is to do as a system
of functions.
• Functional modeling provides a basis for organizing the design team, tasks, and process.
• Derived or generated directly from the customer needs.
• The function defines clear boundaries to associate assemblies or subassemblies of the
final design solutions.
• What is function?
• A function of a product is a statement of a clear, reproducible relationships between the
available input and the desired output of a product, independent on any particular form.
• It is simplest representation of the product.
• Usually just a “an active verb and Noun” Examples “ Chop beans”, “ Clip nails”
• Abstraction:
• It is the process of ignoring what is particular or incidental and emphasizing what is
general and essential.
How Why
Energy Energy
Dish washer
Mechanical Pencil
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 27 BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad Campus
Ad va n ta g e s o f fu n cti o n d e c o m p o si ti o n
• It provide basis for organizing the design team, tasks and process.
• By mapping customer needs first to function and then to form, more solutions
may be systematically generated.
• It will facilitate the concurrent engineering process.
• The morphological method essentially is nothing more than an orderly way of looking at things.
• Morphological charts originate from the concept of the n-dimensional morphological box (Zwicky
box-1948).
• In the first step of the integral design method, the individual designer makes a list of what he/she
considers to be the most important functions that need to be fulfilled based on the design brief.
• The morphological charts are formed as each designer translates the main goals of the design
task, derived from the program of demands, into functions and aspects. This is then inserted into
the first column of the morphological chart.
• In the second step of the process, the designer adds the possible part-solutions to the related
rows of the functions/aspects of the first column. Based on the given design task, each design
team member approaches the problem according to his/her active perception, memory,
knowledge, and needs.
• These individual morphological charts can then be combined by the design team to form one
morphological overview.
• First, in step three, functions and aspects are discussed and then the team decides which
functions and aspects will be placed in the morphological overview.
• Then, in step 4, all participants of the design team can contribute their solutions for these
functions and aspects by filling in the rows within the morphological overview.
• Putting the morphological charts together enables individual perspectives from each discipline to
be put forward, which in turn highlights the implications of design choices for each discipline.
• These three categories are “ identifying conflicts and solving them with known
physical principles,” “ identifying new principles,” and identifying new product
functions and solving them with known or new principles.”
• Altshuller observed a number of trends in historical invention.
• Compromises is unacceptable.
Principle 1: Segmentation
Principle 40: Composite materials
• Divide an object into independent parts.
• For lighter-weight, stronger vests, the use of
• Make an object easy to disassemble.
composites is an active area of research.
Principle 26: Copying
• Polymers (Kevlar) reinforced with carbon
• Instead of an unavailable, expensive, fragile
nanofibers are currently being investigated as a
object, use simpler and inexpensive copies.
strong lightweight alternative to steel for structural
• Replace an object, or process with optical materials.
copies.
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 43 BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad Campus
T R I Z Ex a m p l e
Conflicts is we desired heavy iron to remove the wrinkles from the cloths but we do
not want a heavy iron due to the impact on ergonomics.
8 – Principle of counterweight: Attach an object with lifting power or use the interactions
with the environment, e.g. aerodynamic lift.
1 – Principle of segmentation: Divide the object into independent parts that are easy to
dissemble, increase the degree of segmentation as much as possible.
37 – Application of thermal expansion: Use expansion or contraction of material by heat.
Use materials with different coefficient of thermal expansion.
18 – Use of mechanical vibration: Make the object vibrate. Increase the frequency of
vibration.
– Principle 40: Composite materials Airbag material that can’t grab skin as it is deployed
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 50 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : C o ffe e M i l l
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 51 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : C o ffe e M i l l
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 52 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : Br e a d To a ste r
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 53 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : Br e a d To a ste r
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 54 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : Br e a d To a ste r
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 55 BITS-Pilani
Ex a m p l e : Br e a d To a ste r
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I G N 56 BITS-Pilani
We ig h te d D e c is i o n M a tr i x
• The weighted decision matrix is a powerful quantitative technique. It evaluates a set of choices
(for example, ideas or projects) against a set of criteria you need to take into account.
• It also is known as the "prioritization matrix" or "weighted scoring model". No need to get
confused.
• Procedure:
– List different choices
• AHP leads a design team through the calculation of weighting factors for decision criteria
for one level of the hierarchy at a time.
• AHP also defines a pairwise, comparison based method for determining relative ratings for
the degree to which each of a set of options fulfills each of the criteria.
2. Manufacturing cost
3. Reparability
4. Durability
5. Reliability
6. Time to produce.
DE G531 – P R O D U C T D E S I GN 63 BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad Campus
AH P Pr o c e ss
• The rating of pair A to pair B is the reciprocal of the rating of pair B to A. That
means if it is determined that A is strongly more important than B, the rating of A
to B is set as 5. This makes the rating of B to A 1/5 or 0.20.
• AHP Process:
6. If CR < 0.1 the {W} is considered to be valid; otherwise adjust [C] entries and repeat.
• Objective
• Selecting a car
• Criteria
• Style, Reliability, Fuel-economy, Cost
• Alternatives
• Civic Coupe, Saturn Coupe, Ford Escort, Mazda Miata
1) Normalize the column entries by dividing each entry by the sum of the column.
2) Take the overall row averages
Relative
weights Relative scores
Relative Scores for Each Criteria for each for each
Location Salary Content Long-Term criteria alternative
A 0.174 0.050 0.210 0.086 0.164
B 0.510 x 0.496 = 0.256
C 0.293 0.444 0.038
D 0.012 0.289 0.335
0.489 0.312 0.354 0.130 0.238
0.290
0.044 0.194 0.398
0.188