Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Thesis (1 point)
• Responds to the prompt with a historically defensible
thesis/claim that establishes a line of reasoning
• To earn this point, the thesis must make a claim that responds to
the prompt rather than restating or rephrasing the prompt.
• The thesis must consist of one or more sentences located in one
place, either the introduction or the conclusion.
LEQ RUBRIC
• Contextualization (1point)
• Describes a broader historical context relevant to the prompt
• To earn this point, the response must relate to the topic of the
prompt to broader historical events, developments, or processes
that occur before, during, or continue after the time frame of the
question.
• This point is not awarded for merely a phrase or reference
LEQ RUBRIC
• Evidence (1 point)
• Provides specific examples of evidence relevant to the topic of the prompt.
• How many? At LEAST two.
• Supports an Argument (1 point)
• Supports and argument in response to the prompt using specific and
relevant examples of evidence
• How many times? We don’t know. Definitely some number greater than
twice.
LEQ RUBRIC
• Causation
• The prompt will refer to CAUSES AND/OR EFFECTS (but most likely one or the other)
• Your thesis and argument must address the prompt BUT you can also extend your
argument
• If the prompt calls for causes, you can also provide effects
• You can include multiple causes
• Phrases like “Led to” or “Were a result of” are indicators that the prompt is referring to
CAUSATION
DIFFERENCES IN THE
HISTORICAL REASONING SKILLS
• Comparison
• The prompt will refer to SIMILARITIES AND/OR DIFFERENCES (but most likely one or
the other).
• Your thesis and argument must address the prompt BUT you can extend your argument
• If the prompt calls for similarities, you can also address differences.
• You can include multiple similarities
• You can include multiple differences
• Phrases like “Had in common” or “Diverged from” are indicator that the prompt is
referring to COMPARISON.
DIFFERENCES IN THE
HISTORICAL REASONING SKILLS
IV. Topic 1I
a. Assertion sentence (Must demonstrate use of a HRS)
b. Evidence that supports this assertion
i. If a comparison, you must have evidence from both subjects of the
comparison
c. Use the evidence to support the assertion by:
a. Directly stating how each piece of evidence supports the assertion.
b. Connecting the evidence together to prove the assertion.
ESSAY STRUCTURE
V. Topic III – maybe where you show a difference if you have done similarities,
changes if you have done continuities, causes if you have done effects, etc.
a. Assertion sentence (Must demonstrate use of a HRS)
b. Evidence that supports this assertion
i. If a comparison, you must have evidence from both subjects of the
comparison
c. Use the evidence to support the assertion by:
a. Directly stating how each piece of evidence supports the assertion.
b. Connecting the evidence together to prove the assertion.
ESSAY STRUCTURE