SMEA 2nd QTR 2022

SMEA
2nd Quarter
CY 2022
Presented by: Rosalie B. Cabillas, M.A.Ed.
Elementary School Principal II
Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618
Purok 2 Panaghiusa District, Mangagoy, Bislig City, Surigao del Sur
E-mail Address: 132618@deped.gov.ph
ACCESS
SMEA 2 Quarter of nd
CY 2022
SMEA 2nd Quarter CY 2022
A.1. Enrolment by Gender (Kinder-Grade 6)

Elem-
Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 SubTotal
M 8 14 6 9 14 18 21 90
Quarter 2 (As of
F 10 12 11 14 15 12 9 83
June 30, 2022)
T 18 26 17 23 29 30 30 173
Analysis: Sustain the enrolment within the school year. Thus the school served every pupil under the supervision of
teachers / school personnel. Attaining the best quality learning of every individual that nurture them as a school child-
centered.
Motivated pupils to be in school.
Some interventions will be initiated like:
*sponsorship of some school supplies upon enrolment with complete documents;
*recognize pupils especially in coming to school everyday and early;
*make the classroom into a classhome;
*intensify award system to pupils by the class adviser;
*lobby with the barangay / LGU regarding on the staircase in going to school;
*intensify partnership and linkage with stakeholders, alumni, retirees, NGOs and other organization/s of the
community.

A.2. Number of PARDOs (Kinder-Grade 6)

Quarter 2 Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
M 8 14 6 9 14 18 21
Enrolment Quarter 2 (As of
June 30, 2022) F 10 12 11 14 15 12 9
Total T 18 26 17 23 29 30 30
Number
No. of learners with 5 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
of
SARDOs
or more consecutive F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
absences
and T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PARDOs M within0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Analysis: Sustain the enrolment the school year.
Percentage F 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
T 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Analysis: There were no PARDOs because teachers were able to home visit and follow-up the pupils through their
parents and guardians. Then, pupils were also assisted in their activities. Pacing with pupils for encouragement so that
they will not be left behind. Teachers were able to guide the pupils well on the different activities.

A.3. No Longer Participating in Learning Activities (NLPA) Learners
3RD GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT
SY Kindergarten G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
Enrolment of Current M 8 14 6 9 14 18 21
SY Quarter 2 (As of F 10 12 11 14 15 12 9
June 30, 2022)
T 18 26 17 23 29 30 30
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of NLPA
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Learners
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Percentage F 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
T 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Analysis: No pupils found in the NLPA data because of constant follow-up by the advisers. Teachers conducted
home visitation, updated and followed-up the parents/ guardians summative tests and performance tasks
for submission on scheduled time through group chats, phone calls, messenger and texts. Strong
partnership with the parents so that their son’ daughter (pupils) will be able to submit their modules/ LAS/
summative tests / performance tasks on time.

3RD GRADING PERIOD OF CURRENT SY
Enrolment of Current SY Quarter
M
K
8
A.(7). Failure Rate
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
21 Analysis: No pupils have failure rate due to the
2 (As of June 30, 2022)
F 10 12 11 14 15 12 9 partnership with the parents / guardians because
T 18 26 17 23 29 30 30
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 teachers had done their home visitation/s, scheduled
English F 0 0 0 0 0 0 remedial classes to those who had difficulty in
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% understanding the lesson/s, and Brigada Pagbasa by the
Mathematics
M
F

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
teacher/s and the Parent Volunteer that contributed.
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0
Science F 0 0 0 0
T 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Filipino F 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Araling Panlipunan F 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
MAPEH F 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0
TLE/EPP F 0 0 0
T 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edikasyon sa Pagpapakatao F 0 0 0 0 0 0
T 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0
MTB-MLE F 0 0 0
T 0 0 0
Percentage 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Quarter 1 (January - March 2022) K

A.(17). 4Ps Recipients
G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Analysis: In Quarter 1&2, there
M 0 1 2 0 4 4 3 were 25pupils who were 4Ps
No. of Recipients of 4 Ps in recipients who actively
F 0 1 1 3 1 4 1
Current SY
T 0 2 3 3 5 8 4 participated in the blended:
No. of Recipients of 4Ps M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 modular distance learning
with more than 10 absences F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (printed) and pupils were set to A
(based on LACT of DM 14, & B for 50% face to face classes
s. 2021) T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
and submitted their modules/
M #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Percentage F #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
LAS/ summative tests to their
T #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
advisers. So, the table gleamed
Quarter 2 (April - June 2022) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 that the 4Ps recipients had no
M 0 1 2 0 5 5 4 absences.
No. of Recipients of 4 Ps in
F 0 0 1 2 1 4 0
Current SY
T 0 1 3 2 6 9 4
No. of Recipients of 4Ps M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
with more than 10 absences F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(based on LACT of DM 14,
s. 2021) T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Percentage F #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% #DIV/0!
T #DIV/0! 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

QUALITY
SMEA 2 Quarter of CY 2022 nd

Quarter 2 (As of June 30, 2022)

FILIPINO
Q.1. Literacy Level for Filipino
M

K

G1

G2

G3
9

G4
14

G5
18

G6
21 Analysis: Based on the PHIL-IRI results in Filipino that

Enrolment 14 15 12 9
there were 15pupils belonged in the Frustration Level
F
T 23 29 30 30
M 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 Readers during Pre-Test and decreased to 8pupils during
Non-Reader
T
%

0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
the Post-Test. Then in English, there were pupils belonged
4 0 2 3 to Frustration Level Readers in Pre-Test: 25pupils then
PRE TEST (FILIPINO)
M
F 5 0 0 1
Frustration
T 9 0 2 4 decreased to 11pupils it gleamed that teachers had
% 39.13% 0.00% 6.67% 13.33%
M 3 11 9 12 intensified reading remedial sessions to pupils that helped
Instructional
F
T

6
9
11
22
8
17
4
16
them improved in order to proceed them in the next level
% 39.13% 75.86% 56.67% 53.33% for their reading ability. Parents/ guardians assisted their
M 2 3 7 6
Independent
F 3 4 4 4 son/s or daughter/s in reading capacity. They were given
T 5 7 11 10
% 21.74% 24.14% 36.67% 33.33% guided reading materials especially on letter sounds, word
M 0 0 0 0 identifications and sentences so that they will not be left

F 0 0 0 0
Non-Reader
T 0 0 0 0 behind.
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
POST TEST (FILIPINO)
M 1 0 2 3
F 1 0 0 1
Frustration
T 2 0 2 4
% 8.70% 0.00% 6.67% 13.33%
M 4 3 8 12
F 7 4 5 4
Instructional
T 11 7 13 16
% 47.83% 24.14% 43.33% 53.33%
M 4 11 8 6
F 6 4 7 4
Independent
T 10 15 15 10
% 43.48% 51.72% 50.00% 33.33%

Q.1. Literacy Level for English ENGLISH

M
K

G1

G2

G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
21
Enrolment F 14 15 12 9
T 23 29 30 30
M 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0
Non-Reader
T 0 0 0 0
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
PRE TEST (ENGLISH)

M 5 2 3 4
F 6 3 0 2
Frustration
T 11 5 3 6
% 47.83% 17.24% 10.00% 20.00%
M 4 9 8 12
F 6 8 8 3
Instructional
T 10 17 16 15
% 43.48% 58.62% 53.33% 50.00%
M 1 3 7 5
F 2 4 4 4
Independent
T 3 7 11 9
% 13.04% 24.14% 36.67% 30.00%

M 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0
Non-Reader
T 0 0 0 0
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
POST TEST (ENGLISH)
M 1 0 2 4
F 2 0 0 2
Frustration
T 3 0 2 6
% 13.04% 0.00% 6.67% 20.00%
M 6 6 11 12
F 6 6 8 3
Instructional
T 12 12 19 15
% 52.17% 41.38% 63.33% 50.00%
M 2 8 5 5
F 6 9 4 4
Independent
T 8 17 9 9
Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618 % 34.78% 58.62% 30.00% 30.00%
Q.2. Literacy Level for MTB-MLE

Quarter 2 (APRIL -JUNE)
MTB-MLE
G1

G2

G3
Analysis: There were 18pupils belonged in the
M 14 6 9 Frustration Level Readers in MTB-MLE.
Enrolment as of June 30, 2022 F 12 11 14 The pupils were assisted by their advisers to read
T 26 17 23 very carefully with understanding of the selection
M 0 0 0 read: “Gatas”, “Si Eking ug Enting”, and “Si
F 0 0 0 Mingming”.
Non-Reader
T 0 0 0
% #REF! #REF! #REF!
M 4 2 2
F 4 3 3
Frustration
T 8 5 5
% #REF! #REF!

M 7 3 4
F 5 4 6
Instructional
T 12 7 10
% #REF! #REF! #REF!
M 2 1 3
F 3 4 5
Independent
T 5 5 8
% #REF! #REF! #REF!

3RD GRADING Q.5. Quarterly Grades
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
21 Analysis: The table shown that
Enrolment as of June 30, 2022 F 12 11 14 15 12 9 there were 16pupils or 8%
T 26 17 23 29 30 30 belong in a Fairly Satisfactory
M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 or a range between 75-79 %.
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 7.00
Fairly F 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 2.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 4.50%
%
M 8.00 1.00 6.00 3.00 11.00 9.00
F 6.00 4.00 8.00 2.00 8.00 4.00
English Satisfactory 80-84
AT 7.00% 2.50% 7.00% 2.50% 9.50% 6.50%
%
M 2.00 3.00 1.00 5.00 2.00 3.00
F 1.00 5.00 6.00 9.00 1.00 1.00
Very Satisfactory 85-89
AT 1.50% 4.00% 3.50% 7.00% 1.50% 2.00%
%
M 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 2.00
F 3.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 3.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100 AT 2.00% 1.50% 0.50% 5.00% 4.00% 2.00%
%
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Did not Meet
Expectation
70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 7.00
Fairly F 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 4.50%
%
M 8.00 0.00 3.00 7.00 10.00 6.00
Math F 4.00 3.00 8.00 6.00 3.00 4.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 6.00% 1.50% 5.50% 6.50% 6.50% 5.00%
%
M 3.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 1.00 6.00
Very F 5.00 5.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 1.00
Satisfactory 85-89
AT 4.00% 4.50% 4.00% 5.50% 3.50% 3.50%
%
M 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00
F 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 2.50% 1.50% 1.50% 2.50% 4.50% 2.00%
%
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
Enrolment as of June 30, 2022 F 12 11 14 15 12 9 there were 13pupils or 6.50%
M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 or a range between 75-79 %.
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 1.00 0.00 1.00 9.00
Fairly F 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 5.50%
%
M 2.00 3.00 10.00 6.00
Science F 1.00 7.00 2.00 4.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 1.50% 5.00% 6.00% 5.00%
%
M 6.00 4.00 2.00 3.00
F 8.00 3.00 7.00 1.00
AT 7.00% 3.50% 4.50% 2.00%
%
M 1.00 7.00 5.00 2.00
F 3.00 5.00 3.00 3.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 2.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.50%
%
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 5.00
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Fairly Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.50% 0.50% 0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 3.00%
%
M 7.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 7.00 8.00
Filipino F 3.00 3.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 4.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 5.00% 2.00% 5.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00%
%
M 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00
F 6.00 6.00 4.00 9.00 8.00 2.00
AT 5.00% 4.50% 4.00% 6.50% 6.00% 3.50%
%
M 2.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 6.00 3.00
F 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 3.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 2.50% 2.50% 2.00% 6.00% 4.50% 2.50%
%
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 or a range between 75-79 %.
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 6.00
Fairly F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 3.50%
%
M 7.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 7.00 9.00
AP F 7.00 2.00 4.00 7.00 1.00 5.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 7.00% 1.50% 2.50% 6.00% 4.00% 7.00%
%
M 4.00 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 3.00
F 2.00 7.00 10.00 3.00 8.00 1.00
AT 3.00% 5.50% 8.00% 3.50% 7.00% 2.00%
%
M 2.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 3.00
F 3.00 2.00 0.00 5.00 3.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 2.50% 1.50% 0.50% 5.00% 4.00% 2.50%
%

M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 6.00
Fairly F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.50% 3.50%
%
M 6.00 2.00 1.00 7.00 4.00 9.00
MAPEH F 4.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 5.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 5.00% 1.50% 0.50% 5.50% 2.00% 7.00%
%
M 5.00 3.00 7.00 5.00 7.00 4.00
F 5.00 7.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 1.00
AT 5.00% 5.00% 4.00% 6.50% 4.50% 2.50%
%
M 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 6.00 2.00
F 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 10.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 2.50% 2.00% 2.00% 2.50% 8.00% 2.00%
%

M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
M 0.00 0.00 0.00 or a range between 75-79 %.
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00
Expectation 70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
%
M 0.00 1.00 5.00
Fairly F 0.00 0.00 0.00
Satisfactory 75-79
AT 0.00% 0.50% 2.50%
%
M 3.00 5.00 7.00
TLE F 6.00 1.00 6.00
Satisfactory 80-84
AT 4.50% 3.00% 6.50%
%
M 4.00 6.00 6.00
F 4.00 3.00 1.00
AT 4.00% 4.50% 3.50%
%
M 7.00 6.00 3.00
F 5.00 8.00 2.00
Outstanding 90-100
AT 6.00% 7.00% 2.50%
%
M
G1
14
G2
6
G3
9
G4
14
G5
18
G6
21
Analysis: The table shown that there
were 7pupils or 3.50% belong in a
Enrolment as of June 30, 2022 F 12 11 14 15 12 9 Fairly Satisfactory or a range
T 26 17 23 29 30 30 between 75-79 %.
M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The pupils who got the range of
Did not Meet
F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75-79% will be given an
70-74 AT 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Expectation enhancement / remedial classes so
% that they will be improved for the
M 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 next grade level.
Fairly F 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Before they will be given the
Satisfactory 75-79 enhancement/ remedial classes, the
AT 0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 2.50%
% following activities will be done:
M 6.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 *make a letter informing the division
F 2.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 0.00 4.00 office that the school will be handling
EsP Satisfactory 80-84 an enhancement classes;
AT 4.00% 0.00% 1.00% 4.00% 2.00% 4.50%
% *sent consent letter to parents/
M 5.00 4.00 6.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 guardians;
F 7.00 7.00 10.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 *set schedules for the teachers &
Very Satisfactory 85-89 pupils;
AT 6.00% 5.50% 8.00% 5.00% 5.50% 5.00%
% *pupils’ activities for their learning
M 2.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 7.00 3.00 during enhancement/ remedial
F 3.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 8.00 3.00 classes; and
Outstanding 90-100 *recognize pupils’ improvement.
AT 2.50% 3.00% 2.00% 5.50% 7.50% 3.00%
%
GOVERNANCE
SMEA 2 Quarter of CY 2022 nd

G.1. Number of Classrooms, CRs, Tables, Chairs

QUARTER 2 (As of June 30, 2022) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 0
Frequency 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
No. of Classrooms
% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 1
Frequency 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
No. of Comfort Rooms
% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 14.29% 1
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. of Armchairs
% 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No. of Monoblock Chairs
% 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
No. of Learners Tables and Frequency 11 13 10 0 0 0 16 50
Chairs % 22.00% 26.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 32.00% 1
No. of Teacher's Tables and Frequency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chairs % 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Analysis: Each classrooms from Kindergarten to Grade Six Levels has respective comfort rooms. Then the
school had an additional genderized comfort room.
Seats used by the pupils though some grade levels had desks.

G.(7-10).
QUARTER 2 Number of Library/
K TO GRADE 6 Laboratories
Analysis: The school has an ICT
Total Enrolment of Current SY 173 Laboratory with functional computers. It
Total No. of Schools 1 was gleamed that the school had no Science
Frequency & TLE Laboratories. As the school had no
No. of Functional Learner-Library Ratio buildable space at the moment. Therefore,
Library the school used some storage cabinets to
School-Library Ratio keep some Science & Math equipment a
Frequency room.
No. of Science The school mini-library was used as 2-in-
Learner-Sci. Lab Ratio
Laboratory 1: for the books and for storage of other
School-Sci Lab Ratio documents.
No. of TLE Frequency
Laboratories for Learner-TLE Lab Ratio
Different
Specializations School-TLE Lab Ratio
No. of ICT Frequency 1
Laboratories for Learner-ICT Lab Ratio 173:1
Classroom
Instruction School-ICT Lab Ratio 1:1

Quarter 2 KG.12. Number of Textbooks

G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Analysis: There were no
Total Enrolment for Current Sy 18 26 17 23 29 30 30 textbooks in Kindergarten,
Frequency 0 36 30 40 28 36 26 Filipino 6, AP6, MAPEH 6, TLE
English
Ratio 0:1 1:1 2:1 2:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 6,, ESP 1, 3 & 4.
Frequency 0 34 34 50 30 35 37 However, the teacher handling
Math the above mentioned subjects
Ratio 0:1 1:1 2:1 2:1 1:1 1:1 1:1
initiated the resourcefulness
Frequency 0 0 0 26 30 36 33
Science through online research as
Ratio 0:1 0:1 0:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:1 references, usage of modules/ LAS
Frequency 0 34 34 40 30 78 0 and the use of the MELCs that the
Filipino
Ratio 0:1 1:1 2:1 2:1 1:1 3:1 0:1 teacher will be guided when
Araling Frequency 0 34 36 34 28 78 0 discussing the lesson. Then,
Panlipunan Ratio 0:1 1:1 2:1 1:1 1:1 3:1 0:1 teachers were guided by the
Frequency 0 0 34 36 28 36 0 experts (supervisors) through
MAPEH group chat/s in order to be
Ratio 0:1 0:1 2:1 2:1 1:1 1:1 0:1
updated.
Frequency 29 36 0
TLE
Ratio 1:1 1:1 0:1
Frequency 0 36 40 0 0 36 37
EsP
Ratio 0:1 1:1 2 0:1 0:1 1:1 1:1

Quarter 2
G.13. Fund Sources
Total Amount Previous Year Amount Current Year
Fund Source
General Appropriations Act (MOOE) ₱238,000.00 ₱239,000.00
General appropriation Act (Subsidy for

Special Programs)
Analysis: Only One Thousand Pesos was increased from the previous amount for the MOOE
Allocation from Php238,000.00 to Php.239,000.00

G.14. Awards and Recognition

No awards received for the 2nd quarter.

Quarter 2G.15. Stakeholders Support to Education STAKEHOLDERS SUPPORT TO EDUCATION

ACTIVITY Contributions Attendance
Volunteer No. of
Co-Curricular Activities Cash In Kind No. Invited Attendance Rate
Hours Attendees
Extra-Curricular Activities
snacks, bulb, water, labor

1 TAGBO 200
Php.2,500.00
2 Distribution of Modules 173
3 SBFP Food Package Distribution 35
Analysis: Parents/Guardians were active in getting and returning of the modules of their son/ daughter. It also includes
in getting of the foodpacks by the SBFP beneficiaries through their parents/ guardians.
Partnership with our stakeholders helped developed the school .

G.(19). Teachers’ Professional Dev’t.
Quarter 2 ( As of June 2022) K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Analysis: 7/7 teachers attended different trainings
Total No. of Teachers F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 through online / face-to-face so that the teachers
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 will be well-versed in knowledge, skill in the field
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of endeavor:
F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Content *Grade 5 Teacher attended the online NEAP
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Scholarship
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *Community of Practice (All Teachers)
Pedagogy/Instruction
F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Instructional Supervision especially on the
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lesson plan for second graded classroom
% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% observation with the content used for the
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL NUMBER
localization/ F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 interactive discussions and strategies that
OF TEACHERS scaffolds from the objectives down to the
Contextualization T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRAINED
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% evaluation and its congruency of the lesson.
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Assessment
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Learning Resource materials
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total No. of Teachers Trained
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Teachers who were not Trained
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

G.(20). School Head Professional Dev’t.
Quarter 2 (As of June 2022)
Personal and Professional Student- Parent Involment
School Instructional Human Resource Management
Attributes and Interpersonal Centered and Community
Trainings Leadership Leadership and Professional Development
Effectiveness Learning Partnership
M 0
Total No. of School
F 1 1 1 1 1 1
Heads
T 1 1 1 1 1 1
M 0
F 1 1 1 1 1 1
Elementary
T 1 1 1 1 1 1
% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Analysis: The School Head attended different MANCOMs monthly, attended online/ face to face conferences, attended also the NEAP Scholarship on the
Coaching Program

G.(20). School Head Professional Dev’t.
Quarter 2 (As of June 2022)
Personal and Professional Instructiona Student- Parent Involment
School Human Resource Management
Attributes and Interpersonal l Centered and Community
Trainings Leadership and Professional Development
Effectiveness Leadership Learning Partnership
M 0
Total No. of School
F 1 1 1 1 1 1
Heads
T 1 1 1 1 1 1
M 0
F 1 1 1 1 1 1
Elementary
T 1 1 1 1 1 1
% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Analysis: The School Head attended different MANCOMs monthly, attended online/ face to face conferences, attended also the NEAP Scholarship on the
Coaching Program

G.(25). Electrical Supply
Quarter 2 ( As of June 2022)
Elementary Analysis: The School has electricity through Grid supply
Electrical Supply from SURSECO I.
Number of Schools 1
Percentage 100.00%
Grid Supply 1
Percentage 100.00%
Solar Power 0
Percentage 0.00%
Generator 0
Percentage 0.00%
No Source of Electricity 0
Percentage 0.00%
Others
Percentage

G.(26). LAC
3RD GRADING OF CURRENT SY K G1 G2 G3 G4 G5 G6 Analysis: The School initiated the
Community of Practice (C.O.P.) even if
Number of Schools conducting LAC Sessions
there was no numbered LAC Design.
Learner Diversity and Student
However, the school will be planning a
Inclusion Learning Action Cell (LAC) that will be
Percentage approved and numbered by the division
office so that it will be recorded. Therefore,
Content and Pedagogy
the School Head will be listing the needed
Topics for LAC Sessions
Percentage trainings so that it will be prioritized

accordingly with Teachers’ TNA so that
Assessment and Reporting
everybody will be guided.
Percentage Every school trainings it must be
approved so that it will be counted under
21st Century Skills and ICT Integration the LAC session/s.

in Instruction and Assessment
Percentage
Curriculum and Contextualization,

Localization and Indigenization
Percentage

Thank You!

SMEA 2nd QTR 2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SMEA 2nd QTR 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SMEA

A.1. Enrolment by Gender (Kinder-Grade 6)

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

A.2. Number of PARDOs (Kinder-Grade 6)

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Quarter 1 (January - March 2022) K

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Quarter 2 (As of June 30, 2022)

21 Analysis: Based on the PHIL-IRI results in Filipino that

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Q.1. Literacy Level for English ENGLISH

PRE TEST (ENGLISH)

Q.2. Literacy Level for MTB-MLE

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

G.1. Number of Classrooms, CRs, Tables, Chairs

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Quarter 2 KG.12. Number of Textbooks

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

G.14. Awards and Recognition

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Quarter 2G.15. Stakeholders Support to Education STAKEHOLDERS SUPPORT TO EDUCATION

snacks, bulb, water, labor

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

Percentage trainings so that it will be prioritized

Isabelo Landeta Elementary School- 132618

You might also like