Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FALLACIES
Methods of Philosophizing (Part 4)
Mr. Edward B. Noda Jr.
Jose Abad Santos SHS
LOGIC
●
Branch of philosophy that focuses on the analysis
of arguments
●
Studies and elaborates on good argumentation.
●
Study of correct thinking and reasoning
Fallacy
Group of statement that appear
to be arguments, but fail to
support the conclusion.
Eg: There is no hope in
the
Philippine government, because the
Philippines is a tropical country.
1. Argumentum ad Hominem
“Attacking the Person”
Examples:
Hominem came from Latin word “homo”
which means man. This fallacy literally means “How can we believe him when
hitting the person below the belt instead of he talks about social distancing,
focusing on the issue at hand. he is a lawyer who is a liar.”
Committed when a person could not give “I am sure that the students have
a counter argument or if he/she could understood the instructions perfectly
not present any evidences or witnesses well because no one raised a hand to
to prove or disprove the statement of ask
another, his/ her assertions are correct anything on them.”
and the opponent is wrong.
7. Petitio Principii
Examples:
(Begging the Question)
“I have the right to free speech, therefore
you cannot stop me from talking.”
A fallacy in which a conclusion is taken
for granted in the premises
“What is a declarative sentence? It is a
Assuming the thing or idea to be sentence that declares.”
proven is true
“Cheating is wrong because it is immoral”
Also known as “circular argument”
8. Hasty Generalization
Example:
This fallacy is committed when one
reaches a generalization based on “Our neighbor who is a police officer
insufficient evidence was convicted of being a drug dealer,
therefore, all police officers are drug
dealers. “
9. Cause-and-effect Examples:
(Post Hoc, Ergo, Propter Hoc) “Ever since you bought that sweater, everything
has been going wrong in your life. You should get
rid of it.”
Assuming that the effect is related to a
cause because both events occur one “Jen comes to class just as the bell rings every
day. Jen’s arrival at class causes the bell to ring.”
after the other.
Infers that something is true of a part, is “You are a doctor, therefore you came
true of a whole from a family of doctors.”
Assuming that what is true of a part is “These cases of robbery in this district
have convinces me that the city has
true for the whole. become a den of thieves and criminals”
Individual to all
11. Fallacy of Division
Examples:
Infers that something is true of the “Your family is smart, therefore you are
whole, must also be true on its parts smart.”
Assuming that what is true for the “You come from a family of doctors and
whole is true for its parts. intellectuals! Surely you can do better in this
course!”
All to individual
12. Fallacy of Equivocation Examples:
Calling two different things by the same “A ruler measures 12 inches, Mayor Isko
name. Moreno is a ruler; therefore, Mayor Isko
is 12 inches.”
Resulting from the use of a particular
word/ expression in multiple senses
throughout an agreement leading to a
false conclusion.
14. Argumentum ad
13. Fallacy of Accident Verecundiam
(Argument from Authority)
Occurs when one attempts to apply Committed when a person uses a
a general rule to an irrelevant name of a popular celebrity or name
situation. of an expert to put more weight in
the assertion being made.
Example:
Cutting people with knives is a crime. Example:
Surgeons cut people with knives. “My assignment in Chemistry is not
Surgeons are criminals. wrong. Ms. Aguirre, my English
teacher who is known internationally
as a novelist, confirmed my answer.”