Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L M R L M R
T 2, 2 1, 0 0, 1 T 1, 1 1, 0 0, 1 ui (a∗) ≥ ui (bi , a∗ )
B 1, 0 0, 1 1, 0 B 1, 0 0, 1 1, 0
› (T, L) is the unique Nash equilibrium.
ui (a∗) > ui (bi , a∗ ) › However, when Player 2 plays L, Player 1 is indifferent between T
and B.
› This is called a non-strict or weak Nash equilibrium.
■ Suppose that the players other than Player i play the action list a−i .
■ Let B i (a−i ) be the set of Player i ’s best (i.e. payoff - maximizing) actions, given
that the other players play a−i . (There may be more than one).
■B i is called the best response function of Player i .
■ B i is a set-valued function, that is, it may give a result with more than one element.
■Every member of B i (a−i ) is a best response of Player i to a−i .
Using Best Response Functions to find Nash Eq.
› Proposition: The action profile a∗ is a Nash equilibrium if
and only if every player’s action is a best response to the
other players’ actions:
∗
a i ∈ B i (a−i ) for every player i (1)
∗
■B i (Q) = {C } for i = 1, 2
■B i (C ) = {C } for i = 1, 2
■ At (C, C ), Player 1 is playing one of his best responses, C , to Player 2’s action, C .
■ At the same time, Player 2 is playing one of his best responses, C , to Player
1’s action, C .
Player 2
C Q Player 1
Battle of Sexes
wife
Football Shopping
Football 2, 1 0, 0
Husband
Shopping 0, 0 1, 2
Battle of Sexes
Player 2
Player 1 and 2 best response
F
2 Nash Equilibrium
F S Player 1
wife
Football Shopping
Football 2, 1 0, 0
Husband
Shopping 0, 0 1, 2
Matching Pennies
Player 2
Head Tail
Head 1, -1 -1, 1
Player 1
Tail -1, 1 1, -1
H
No Nash Equilibrium
H T Player 1
Best Response function
Player 1 best response B1(a2)
Player 2
Player 2 best response B2(a1)
Nash Equilibrium
Player 1
T B
■ Thanks for listening