Professional Documents
Culture Documents
for Framed
Buildings
Lecture 4
• Precast concrete
components require external
connecting devices.
• These usually require
additional bolting or welding.
Connection could
be the weak link, if
not designed
properly
Strong Strong
column beam
element element
General
Strength
Duct
ility
Load
ss e
Stiffn
Deformation
• Constructability
The following items sould be kept in mind
when designing connections:
– Standardised product
– Use repetitious details
– Avoid reinforcement and hardware
congestion
– Provide accessibility
Beam-to-Column
Connection Design
Types of Connections in
Precast Concrete Frames
Rigid Pinned
Connections Connections
Rigid/Continuous Simple
Construction Construction
c
c
= b – c = b – c
= b
M b M b M
Rigid
Semi-rigid
Response of
Connections
Pin
Rotation,
M- curve
Mmax (rigid) Rigid joint
Semi-rigid
joint
Mmax (semi-rigid
joint)
full
less simple
than
Mmax (pin joint) beam
simplerotation
beam
No rotation
rotation
Inflection
Inflection
point point
STIFFNESS
Connection Moment, M
STRENGTH
Pin
Rotation,
Beam-to-column head connection test at CERIB, Epernon, France
Types of Connections
• Transfer mainly
shear forces.
• The connections
lead to simple
construction system
Pinned connection
Hidden corbel using mechanical connection system:
1
1
Fixing tolerances
Column insert,
UC section
Stiffened cleat, cut
from structural tee
Pinned connection
Haunched column
Effect of pinned connections to the analysis
• Pinned connections
• Beam-to-column connections are not capable to
transfer moments from beams to columns.
• Simply supported beams.
Typical example of
EI
rigid connections in
EI RC structure.
• EIconnection= EIbeam
Deformed shape
Undeformed shape
Monolithic rigid
connection in
reinforced concrete
frames
Tension force, T
Couple
External force, M
moment,
Mi
Compression force, C
External moment,
Mi is resisted by
force couple, M
Rigid connection
Rigid connection
Column
Beam
Column
Beam
Effect of rigid connections to the analysis
• Rigid connections
• Beam-to-column connections are capable to resist
moments.
174.8
140.7
140.7 174.8
201.2
114.87 135.9
109.44 170.96
224.3
306.9
194.7
166.01 210.65
57.3 158
368.7
223.3
299.7
10.2 117.1
BENDING MOMENT (kNm)
Load case 2:
1.2Gk + 1.2Qk + 1.2W k
Simple connections at inflection points.
Inflection point
174.8
140.7
140.7 174.8
201.2
114.87 135.9
109.44 306.9 170.96
224.3
194.7
166.01 210.65
57.3 158
223.3
368.7
299.7
10.2 117.1
BENDING MOMENT (kNm)
Load case 2:
1.2Gk + 1.2Qk + 1.2W k
140.7 174.8
201.2
114.87 135.9
109.44 170.96
224.3
306.9
194.7
166.01 210.65
57.3 158
223.3
368.7
299.7
10.2 117.1
BENDING MOMENT (kNm)
Load case 2:
1.2Gk + 1.2Qk + 1.2W k
• A corbel is a short
cantilever component
which supports a load
bearing component. The
beams are supported by Corbel
corbels, so that the shear
forces are transmitted
directly to the corbel.
V
Design of Concrete Bracket or Corbel
e
Potential cracks are assumed to develop as follows:
Crack 1: due to direct shear at corbel junction with column. T
To avoid this failure, provide shear friction steel reinforcement, As and Ash. 3 M = V.e
1
2
=200
Ash
As + Asn
V
Crack 2: Due to diagonal tension e
in corbel.
T
To avoid this failure, provide 3 M = V.e
V 297 103 N
d 2
146.8mm
(0.87 f cu b 0.8 40N / mm (400mm)
Provide d = 200mm
X = 0.5d = 0.5(200mm) = 100mm
1 d
0.5 x 1 200mm 0.5(100mm) o
tan tan 61.9
av 80mm
R 297kN
Ft o
158.6kN
tan tan 61.9
Shear stress, v =
Ff 118 .8 103 N 2
As2 297 mm
0.87 f y 0.87(460 N / mm 2 )
100 As 100(804mm 2 )
1.01
bd (400mm)(200mm)
Table 3.9 BS 8110
100 As
1.01 , d = 200mm } vc = 0.75
bd
since fcu = 40 N/mm2 > 25N/mm2 ,
vc should be multiplied by f cu 1/ 3
25
1/ 3 1/ 3
f 40
vc cu (0.75) 0.88 N / mm 2
25 25
2d 2(200mm)
Enhancement factor, 5
av 80mm)
2
vc 5 0.88 4.4 N / mm 2 > v 3.71N / mm
0.4bv Sv 0.4(400mm)(75mm) 2
Asv 55.2 mm
0.87 f yv 0.87(250 N / mm 2 )
Adopt 2R8@50mm
2R8@50mm
4T16
Try this
• Assuming the nominal gap between end of beam to column face is 20 mm and
friction factor, μ = 0.35. (Any other assumptions not given herein should be
assumed by the candidate).
Column-to-Base
Connection Design
Rigid Connections between column-to-
base can be of three types:
1). Pocket foundation
2). Base plate connection
3). Grouted sleeve.
Pinned column-to-base connection
100 mm
overhang
h
gt
len
nd
Bo
Column-to-base connection
High tensile protruding
Grouted sleeve reinforcement bar
Grouted sleeve
The main disadvantages of this connection:
• The tendency of the bar to be touching the
sides of the sleeves in the precast column,
thus preventing a full development of grout
around the bar.
Design of Grouted Sleeve Column-to-Base Connection
N 805.5 103 N
5.03N / mm2
bh 400mm 400mm
1 1
0.1h
HB
HA
0.9h
HA
A
0.1h
R
(a/6)
CASTELATED COLUMN IN POCKET
then D =
h
40 mm root depth
D
If M/N < 0.15 h, then D > 1.2 h
COLUMN IN POCKET
If M/N > 2.00 h, then D > 2.0 h
C40 infill
Pocket foundation
Thank You