Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disadvantages:
1. It introduces interferes to the smooth aerodynamic flow
over the wing.
2. The main wing never stalls to achieve its CLmax.
• This increases takeoff/landing distances and speeds to
achieve the desired performance.
3. Difficult to apply flaps, since deploying flaps causes
a large nose-down pitching moment.
Static longitudinal stability
• Explain the changes in aerodynamic forces when
varying angle of attack for a static longitudinally stable
airplane.
• Explain the effect of CG location on pitch
maneuverability.
• Define neutral point.
• Explain why the location of the neutral point is only
dependent on the aerodynamic design of the airplane.
Static longitudinal stability
• Indicate the location of the neutral point relative to the locations of
the aerodynamic center of the wing and tail.
• Explain the influence of the downwash variations with angle of
attack variation on the location of the neutral point.
• Explain the contribution of engine nacelles.
• Explain the CG forward and aft limits with respect to:
longitudinal control forces;
elevator effectiveness;
stability.
• Define static margin.
1.2.1 Static longitudinal stability
• It is the ability to return to its original pitch attitude
with no outside assistance.
• The main factors that affect the longitudinal static
stability are:
• the design of the tail-plane,
• the relative position of the CG to CP
• To sustain longitudinal stability, the CG should always
be ahead of the wing CP.
Static longitudinal stability
• The CP is located in the range between 30% and 40%
of the MAC, but CG depends on aircraft designs:
• For a conventional transport airplane, CG is in range of
10% and 30% of the MAC.
• For other types the CG range is normally 10% to 35%.
• Therefore, a conventional transport airplane always
has positive longitudinal static stability no matter
what the angle of attack.
Static longitudinal stability
• CG vs CP position determine the direction of the
additional wing-pitching moment (dLX).
• Wing CP ahead of CG is
wing-unstable (often on
high-AOA like T/O and
Landing)
• By countering the
destabilizing wing
moment.
• The length of both arms is
dependent upon CG
position.
The Aerodynamic Centre (AC) cont’d
• The tail-plane helps to produce a state of static
longitudinal stability following a pitching
disturbance (nose-up/down).
Your Name
Effect of CG
• CG shift changes Tail aerodynamic damping, thereby
changing the Maneuvering stability.
• For a trimmed flight at a constant airspeed.
• A forward movement of the CG position increases the
maneuver stability.
• An aft movement of the CG position decreases the
maneuver stability.
The effect of trim setting
• A high stick force per ‘g’, if required, can be reduced by
the use of the elevator trim tab setting, though it’s not
desirable.
• Excess trimming of stick forces may reduce the effectiveness of
the stick.
• A forward CG position requires a larger deflection of the
elevators.
• Adequate elevator control should remain for maneuver, landing
or take-off.
1.2.8 Stick Force Per ‘g’ and the limit-load factor
• Airplane should demonstrate a steady increase in stick force
with increase in load factor or “g”.
• The stick force per ‘g’ has both an upper and a lower limit for
acceptable control characteristics:
• For high maneuvering stability, a high stick force gradient is needed.
The forward CG limit prevents an excessively high maneuvering
stick force gradient.
• As the CG moves aft, the stick force gradient decreases with
decreasing maneuvering stability and the lower limit of stick force
gradient may be reached.
Cont’d
• If the stick force gradient is too high, the airplane will be
difficult and tiring to maneuver.
• Also, If the stick force gradient is too low, the airplane will be
overstressed inadvertently when light control forces exist.
Longitudinal Control
• The lower limits of controllability will set the upper
limits of static stability.
• Three principal phases of flight critically require
longitudinal control power:
• Maneuvering, Take-off and Landing.
• Any one of these conditions can set a limit to the
forward CG position.
I. maneuvering Control Requirement
• The airplane needs sufficient longitudinal control
power to maneuver.
Swept Fin→
Cont’d
• Figure below illustrates in graphical form the
effects of the major parts of the aircraft on
directional stability.
Propeller Slipstream
• The swirling slipstream and strikes the vertical tail
from one side, and destabilizes.
• Caused by Propeller of a single-engine aircraft
• This is balanced by rudder, to prevent sideslip.
• It is significant at high power and low dynamic pressure.
1.4 Static Lateral Stability
Static lateral stability
• Define static lateral stability.
• Explain the effects of static lateral stability being too
weak or too strong.
• Define ‗bank angle Ø‘.
• Define the roll-moment coefficient Cl.
• Explain how without coordination the bank angle
creates sideslip angle.
Lateral static stability
• The lateral static stability is a tendency to return to the
wings-level after a disturbance.
• For a positive lateral static stability, a rolling moment
opposes the initial disturbance, a ‘Roll-Damping’
effect.
1.4.1 Bank angle Ø
• After a roll disturbance, the down-
going wing has a greater AOA than the
up-going wing, so it creates greater
lift.
• The differential lift thus produced
will tend to resist the rolling
movement, known as roll-
damping.
1.4.2 The roll-moment coefficient (CL)
• A rolling moment, L, to the right is +ve, and -ve to
the left.
• It is calculated by using the formula:
• L=Cl½ρV2Sb
Cl=the rolling moment coefficient;
ρ =the air density;
V=the airspeed;
S=the wing area and
b=the wingspan.
1.4.3 Contribution of sideslip angle (β)
• A rolling disturbance also introduces a side-slipping motion
in the direction of roll, due to the inclination of the lift vector.
• speed increases,
• roll increases,
• pitch decreases
• It results in a descent,
and altitude is lost.
• Spiral instability can be diminished at the design stage
by:
• decreasing the fin area
• Encouraging dihedral effects
1.5.3 Dutch Roll
• Dutch roll occurs with a weak directional stability vs
strong lateral stability.
• Hence, “dihedral effect”
corrects to wings level
• But the weathercock effect fails
to turn into the sideslip (and
may even turn away).
Frise part
3. Aileron-rudder coupling: automatically gives
proportional rudder input when the ailerons are
deflected, to counter the adverse yaw.
4. Roll control spoilers: reduce the adverse yaw, as the
down-going wing will have an increase in drag due to
the raised spoiler.
2.4.4 Roll/yaw interaction
Control Secondary Effects:
• Yaw caused by rudder makes the outside wing travels
slightly faster than the inner wing, developing more lift.
• Roll results by their differential lift.
• Aileron banking the wing causes a sideslip into the turn.
• The keel surface acting behind the CG wether-cocks the
airplane towards the lower wing.
Means to reduce control forces
• Describe the purpose of aerodynamic balance.
• Describe the working principle of the nose and horn balance.
• Describe the working principle of internal balance.
• Describe the working principle and the application of:
balance tab;
anti-balance tab;
spring tab;
servo tab.
• Describe fully powered controls.
• Describe power-assisted controls.
• Explain why artificial feel is required.
• Explain the inputs to an artificial feel system.
2.4.5 Means to reduce control forces
• When a control surface is deflected, the aerodynamic
load will try to return it.
• This force is the product of the Lift force on the control surface and
the perpendicular distance of its CP to the hinge line.
2. Horn balance
3. Internal Balance
1. Inset hinge
• The hinge is set back towards the CP of the control
surface
• It reduces the force needed to move the control
Thank You!
Thank You!