Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Commitment
Clarity All employees Complexity
Goals must be must be Goals must be
clear and specific committed to the achievable and not
for all Goal happening overwhelming
Challenging Feedback
Goals should be Feedback on the
challenging Goals should be
enough to be considered
motivating without
being unrealistic
The Pearl project project
Analyzing the Goal setting theory
Clarity
Yes, Goal Setting Theory was followed on the clarity parameter in the case.
Clarity of goals refers to the degree to which goals are clear, specific, and unambiguous, and in
the case of Zeth and his team at Ditto, Inc., the goals appear to be clearly defined:
• Specific Deliverables: Zeth and his project leaders provided a list of deliverables that needed
to be coded, along with major dates for completing these deliverables. This specificity in
outlining what needed to be accomplished is in line with the clarity parameter of Goal
Setting Theory.
• Regular Meetings: The case mentions the daily "Sunrise Meetings" held at 8:30 a.m., where
the team updated each other on their progress and discussed any problems they were
facing. These meetings provided a platform for ensuring that everyone was aware of the
project's goals and objectives.
• Commitment to Release Dates: The engineers' commitment to meeting release dates, even
to the point of giving up personal time, reflects their understanding of the clarity of the
project's goals and the importance of adhering to them.
Feedback
No, the case does not align with the parameter of feedback in Goal Setting Theory. The feedback given
by the team member was not considered and hence the following mentioned were the consequences: