PUBLIC RELATIONS ETHICS PR professionals are often under fire for distorting the truth or withholding information. Ethical public relations call for upholding transparency when dealing with any information, sensitive or not. Blurring fact and fiction can cause a serious rift in credibility and tarnish a firm's reputation. Public relations can influence and build positive relationships and reputation while unethical communication can erode public trust and potentially create a crisis situation. PUBLIC RELATIONS SOCIETY OF AMERICA & PR ETHICS
Most PR practitioners in the US look to PRSA’s code of ethics
to guide our behaviors and our decision-making. The six core professional values in PR are: Honesty: Providing accurate and truthful information — the foundation of earning public trust. Advocacy: Providing views from different sides and/or people and all relevant facts so people can make informed decisions. Independence: Taking responsibility for your own actions, providing objective counsel. Expertise: Acquiring knowledge and using critical thinking to maintain credibility as an expert and earn a trusting relationship between those you represent and the public.
Loyalty: Respect and maintain loyalty to those you counsel
and represent, but not at the expense of the public interest.
Fairness: Respecting and considering all views and
opinions. UNETHICAL COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS
According to Redding’s (1996) typology of unethical communications,
there are six general categories of unethical communication: Coercive: Behavior reflecting abuse of power. For example, intolerance or refusal to listen to others’ opinions, freedom of speech constraints, quashing dissenting discussions. Destructive: Aggressive or misuse of information to make others feel inferior. This includes things like derogatory insinuations, epithets, distasteful jokes, character assassination. Deceptive: Dishonest and misleading messages. For example, euphemisms intended to obscure defects or deeds, deliberate ambiguity, weaponizing truth, concealing or covering up displeasing facts. Intrusive: Communication that invades or denies others’ rights to privacy. This includes listening to others’ phone messages, reading someone else’s files, employer surveillance of workers and other forms of corporate intrusion.
Secretive: Nonverbal communication. For example, intentional
unresponsiveness, manipulating a message to skew how the reader interprets it, culpable silence (purposefully preventing information from being given).
Manipulative: Communicating without concern for the public interest or
otherwise preventing the receiver from knowing the actual intentions behind a message. This includes demagoguery (exploiting people’s fears, ignorance or prejudices for gain) or using a patronizing or condescending tone.