CRITIQUE

Jakeline Barrios
Critiquing Danya Dacuna art work
peacook

DESCRIPTION
A). I learned that her artwork was called the peacook. Its
a type of bird that has beautiful feathers.
B). She used feather, glue, bead, and dead grass.
C). She used beads as the eyes of the bird. She used the
feathers for the tail by using the hot glue gun.
D). She used a round sponge as the body of the bird.

ANALYSIS
1.

Her artwork has a natural vibe to it. She used grass

and leafs to make her artwork.

A). I think that the dominant element is the feathers that

are used to make the tail of the bird. It brings out the
whole sculpture.
B). I think that it is suppose to be a joyful artwork.
Because she used a lot of bright colors in her artwork.
C). In my opinion her artwork looks ideal because at first
you cant really tell what it is but then once you pay more
attention to it, you can tell its a peacook.

ANALYSIS
D). Danya Dacuna didnt really have a certain pattern to
her artwork. Because she made it really unique. By
making it every time u see it you find something new.
E). She didnt really have a part where she repeated a
pattern.
F). I think that the part that brought out the sculpture is
the feathers that she put together to make the tail.

INTERPRETATION
A). Danya Dacunas art work was trying to express the
beauty of the peacook.
B). She said that it doesnt matter whats on the outside.
It matters more whats on the insides.
C). It reminds me of the time I went to the zoo cause
there was many birds
D) I cant really relate to the art work other then the
meaning of it.

JUDGMENT
A). I think that it is a success because the tail makes it
look beautiful
B). I like that it falls under the natural section just
because of the animal.
C). She was very creative in designing it.
D). Put more feathers on the bird.