IPA Form No.

EE517 Issue 1

IPA
1 2 3 7 8

Interconnect Product Assembly AS

CAPACITY VERIFICATION (Production Readiness Review / RUN@RATE)

4 5

Part Number Part Description XXX Annual Capacity Planning Volume pcs/year Process Step Process Description Units hours shifts days weeks hours % pcs/hour % % pcs/hour pcs/year % X hour pcs pcs % pcs pcs/ hour pcs/ hour hour text % X STEP 1 STEP 2

Run@Rate Date Supplier Name Supplier Location STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6

I - Supplier Working Standards

9 10 11 12 13 14

Working hours/shift Shifts/ day Days/ week Weeks/ year Total hours/year (9*10*11*12) % of line for XXX parts (Allocation %) Quoted Production Rate (part # item 1) Quoted % scrap Quoted % line efficiency Adjusted production rate (15*(1-16)*17) Available capacity (15*14*(1-16)*17)*13 Utilization % (3/19) Bottleneck operation Trial run duration Total parts produced Number of bad parts First time capability % ((23-24)/24)*100 Number of good parts (23-24) Net output (26/22) Takt Time Rate (Target) (3/13*14) Downtime Reason

II - Supplier Capacity Data III - RUN@RATE Results

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31 32

Run-Off utilization % (3/(27*13*14)) Bottleneck operation

SHADED CELLS ARE CALCULATED and protected

34

SUMMARY

35

RUN@RATE results are acceptable and meet XXX capacity planning volume requirements:
33

The attached capability study results meet XXX requirements: Corrective actions are required: New production readiness trial run is required: Date: Date:

Overall Process Utilization % 0.00%

Status Acceptable

Auditor Information Name: Company: Location:

36

Supplier representative signature:

Auditor signature:

IPA Form No. EE517 Issue 1

IPA
1 2 3 7 8

Interconnect Product Assembly AS

CAPACITY VERIFICATION (Production Readiness Review / RUN@RATE)

30301458B Inflator retainer bracket pcs/year Process Step Process Description Units hours shifts days weeks hours % pcs/hour % % pcs/hour pcs/year % X hour pcs pcs % pcs pcs/ hour pcs/ hour hour text % X 28.1% 700,000 STEP 1 Stamp Part 7.5 3 5 48 5400 100% 720.0 2% 97% 684 3,695,933 19% 2.00 929 5 99.46% 924 462 130 STEP 2 CNC #1 8.5 2 5 48 4080 87% 210.0 2% 94% 193 686,677 102% X 1.00 249 2 99.20% 247 247 197 0.5 Reprogramming 79.8% 97.1% X 34 SUMMARY 72.3% 70.3%
35 4 5 6

Part Number Part Description XXX Annual Capacity Planning Volume

Run@Rate Date Supplier Name Supplier Location STEP 3 CNC #2 7.0 3 5 48 5040 100% 164.0 5% 95% 148 745,970 94% 2.00 290 4 98.62% 286 143 139 STEP 4 Weld Fasteners 7.0 3 5 48 5040 100% 240.0 9% 92% 201 1,012,677 69% 1.25 252 12 95.24% 240 192 139

February 14, 2004 Acme Machining Cleveland, OH STEP 5 Paint 10.5 1 5 48 2520 50% 1200.0 5% 95% 1,083 1,364,580 51% 1.00 794 4 99.50% 790 790 556 STEP 6

I - Supplier Working Standards

9 10 11 12 13 14

Working hours/shift Shifts/ day Days/ week Weeks/ year Total hours/year (9*10*11*12) % of line for XXX parts (Allocation %) Quoted Production Rate (part # item 1) Quoted % scrap Quoted % line efficiency Adjusted production rate (15*(1-16)*17) Available capacity (15*14*(1-16)*17)*13 Utilization % (3/19) Bottleneck operation Trial run duration Total parts produced Number of bad parts First time capability % ((23-24)/24)*100 Number of good parts (23-24) Net output (26/22) Takt Time Rate (Target) (3/13*14) Downtime Reason

II - Supplier Capacity Data III - RUN@RATE Results

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

30 31 32

Run-Off utilization % (3/(27*13*14)) Bottleneck operation

SHADED CELLS ARE CALCULATED and protected

RUN@RATE results are acceptable and meet XXX capacity planning volume requirements:
33

The attached capability study results meet XXX requirements: Corrective actions are required: New production readiness trial run is required: Date: Date: April 1, 2404 May 16, 2004

Overall Process Utilization % 97.13%

Status Acceptable

Auditor Information Name: Gerald Biggs Company: XXX Location: Mesa, AZ

36

Supplier representative signature:

Tom Alison

Auditor signature:

Gerald Biggs

IPA

Interconnect Product Assembly AS

IPA Form No. EE518 Issue 1

SUPPLIER PROCESS CAPABILITY

Sample Size Critical and Signficant? Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank

SECTION 1 -SPECIFICATION DATA AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS

Part Number

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

Lower Specification Limit

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number

Sample Size Critical and Signficant?

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number

Sample Size Critical and Signficant?

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number

Sample Size Critical and Signficant?

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number

Sample Size Critical and Signficant?

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

IPA Form No. EE518 Issue 1

IPA

Interconnect Product Assembly AS

SUPPLIER PROCESS CAPABILITY

30301458B Critical and Signficant? Sample Size 30 Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank

SECTION 1 -SPECIFICATION DATA AND MEASUREMENT RESULTS

Part Number

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

Upper Specification Limit

3.5500 6.8200 0.5100 0.0550

Lower Specification Limit

3.4500 6.7800 0.4950 0.0450

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hole Diameter 3.5 mm 6.8 mm dimension .5 radius .05 chamfer

3.4800 6.7900 0.4990 0.0510

0.0300 0.0500 0.0100 0.0010

0.333 0.067 0.133 1.333

Part Number Critical and Signficant?

Sample Size

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Upper Specification Limit Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number Critical and Signficant?

Sample Size

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Upper Specification Limit Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number Critical and Signficant?

Sample Size

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Upper Specification Limit Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Part Number Critical and Signficant?

Sample Size

Note: If no USL/LSL, then leave cell blank Upper Specification Limit Lower Specification Limit

Characteristic or Specification

Average

Standard Deviation

PpK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7