MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS

PLANT III

VARIABLE STUDY (Average-Range Method)

PART NAME

W/S PARTITION RR DR R/L

DATE

26.5.10

NOMINAL DIMENSION

APPRAISER A

Umesh Kumar

PART NO.

84665/75 M75J00

CHARACTERISTIC

Gap

UPPER TOLERANCE

APPRAISER B

Laxmikant

MODEL

YN-4

EQUIPMENT USED

Feeler Gauge (FG-07)

LOWER TOLERANCE

APPRAISER C

Naresh Prtap

APPRAISEE

M. NEGI

%R & R
ndc

24.31 %
6.00

Apprisar A
Trials
1
2
3

10

0.85

0.75

0.68

0.48

0.85

0.72

0.82

0.89

0.52

0.90

0.79

0.71

0.65

0.45

0.79

0.68

0.86

0.90

0.55

0.95

0.78

0.79

0.69

0.46

0.80

0.64

0.80

0.95

0.60

0.90

Avg. (Xi)

0.81

0.75

0.67

0.46

0.81

0.68

0.83

0.91

0.56

0.92

Range (Ri)

0.07

0.08

0.04

0.03

0.06

0.08

0.06

0.06

0.08

0.05

Constant Tables (for n=10, r=3)

K1 : Based on no. of Trials
K2 : Based on no. of Appriser
K3 : Based on Sample Size
used in trials

No. Of
Trials (r)

No. of
Parts
(n)

0.74
10

0.061

A2

D3

0.0583

D4

K1

K2

1.880

3.267

0.8862

0.7071

1.020

2.575

0.5908

0.5231

1.020

2.575

0.591

0.523

Actual
Parts
(n)

0.1502

Trials
1
2
3

0.7497

10

0.82

0.74

0.65

0.46

0.85

0.67

0.90

0.95

0.55

0.95

24.31 %

0.76

0.79

0.70

0.49

0.89

0.72

0.85

1.00

0.60

0.90

6.00

0.79

0.76

0.64

0.52

0.85

0.68

0.85

0.94

0.55

0.95

Avg. (Xi)

0.79

0.76

0.66

0.49

0.86

0.69

0.87

0.96

0.57

0.93

0.76

Range (Ri)

0.06

0.05

0.06

0.06

0.04

0.05

0.05

0.06

0.05

0.05

0.053

K3

1
2

10

0.79

0.74

0.65

0.48

0.85

0.70

0.95

0.95

0.56

0.95

0.82

0.69

0.68

0.49

0.83

0.68

0.85

0.85

0.59

0.95

0.75

0.65

0.69

0.54

0.81

0.65

0.85

0.94

0.62

0.95

Avg. (Xi)

0.79

0.69

0.67

0.50

0.83

0.68

0.88

0.91

0.59

0.95

0.75

Range (Ri)

0.07

0.09

0.04

0.06

0.04

0.05

0.10

0.10

0.06

0.00

0.061

Part Avg.
(XP)

0.79

0.74

0.67

0.49

0.84

0.68

0.86

0.93

0.57

0.93

3
0.5231

4
0.4467

5
0.403

6
0.3742

7
0.3534

TOLERANCE

8
0.3375

9
0.3249

10
0.3146

RP =

0.45

RP =

Range of Part Avg

Repeatability - Equipment Variation (EV)

EV = R x K1
=>
Reproducibility - Appraiser Variation (AV)
2
2
1/2
AV = {|(xDIFF x K2) - (EV /nr)|} =>

Part Variation (PV)

PV
Total Variation (TV)

= Rp X K3
2

2 1/2

TV = {(R&R + PV )}

Average (X bar) Chart for Appraiser A

If % R & R > 30%, system needs improvement

NDC >= 5

CONCLUSION

0.0345

% EV =

100 (EV/TV)

=>

23.73 %

0.0077

% AV =

100 (AV/TV)

=>

5.3 %

=>

0.0353

=>

0.1409

=>

0.1452

% R&R = 100 (R&R/TV) =>

% PV = 100 (PV/TV)
No.of distinct categories

24.31 %
97 %

=>

NDC= 1.41(PV/GRR) =>

Average (X bar) Chart for Appraiser C

Average (X bar) Chart for Appraiser B

1.00

1.20

1.00

If 10% < % R & R < 30%, system may be

acceptable based on importance of application, cost
of gage, cost of repair, etc.,

n = number of parts
r = number of trials
Repeatability & Reproducibility (R & R)
R & R (GRR)= {(EV2 + AV2)}1/2

COMPARISION TO
TOTAL VARIATION

MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS

Apprisar C
Trials
1
2
3

2
0.7071

If % R & R < 10%, system is acceptable

0.8092

0.315

10

Value of K3 with ref. To n (Sample Size)

0.0000

0.6902

Apprisar B

ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA

Sr.No.

0.0190

K3

0.90

0.90
1.00

0.80
0.70

0.80
0.70

0.80

0.60

0.60

0.50

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.40
0.40

0.30

0.30

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.10

0.10

0.00

0.00

10

10

0.00

0.16

0.16

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.12

0.12

0.12

0.10

0.10

0.10

0.08

0.08

0.08

0.06

0.06

0.06

0.04

0.04

0.04

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.00

0.00

PREPARED BY:

10

10

10

Range (R) Chart for Appraiser C

0.16

Range (R) Chart for Appraiser B

Range (R) Chart for Appraiser A

0.00

CHECKEED BY:

10

APPROVED BY: