Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-356621200
    26 views1 page
    The document provides an analysis of a group project across several criteria in three levels of performance: 1. The group worked very well together by sharing information thoroughly and participating actively. Their presentation creatively conveyed an accurate and informative message through good research cited properly. 2. The group was well-organized but did not share research effectively. Their somewhat engaging presentation adequately communicated the main point despite limited details. Research included proper citations but some unreliable sources. 3. The group lacked organization and synchronization. Their irrelevant and unengaging presentation failed to get the point across. Research relied on unreliable sources without citations.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides an analysis of a group project across several criteria in three levels of performance: 1. The group worked very well together by sharing information thoroughly and participating actively. Their presentation creatively conveyed an accurate and informative message through good research cited properly. 2. The group was well-organized but did not share research effectively. Their somewhat engaging presentation adequately communicated the main point despite limited details. Research included proper citations but some unreliable sources. 3. The group lacked organization and synchronization. Their irrelevant and unengaging presentation failed to get the point across. Research relied on unreliable sources without citations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    26 views1 page

    Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-356621200
    The document provides an analysis of a group project across several criteria in three levels of performance: 1. The group worked very well together by sharing information thoroughly and participating actively. Their presentation creatively conveyed an accurate and informative message through good research cited properly. 2. The group was well-organized but did not share research effectively. Their somewhat engaging presentation adequately communicated the main point despite limited details. Research included proper citations but some unreliable sources. 3. The group lacked organization and synchronization. Their irrelevant and unengaging presentation failed to get the point across. Research relied on unreliable sources without citations.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    3 2 1

    Content Very informative Informative but Not informative


    and with plenty of lacking detail and not much
    supporting details detail
    Details
    Group Group worked Group was well Group was neither
    Collaboration together and organized but was organized or
    relayed the unable to share synchronized
    information well research well
    with ample
    participation
    Creativity Presentation was Presentation was Presentation was
    catchy and accurate somewhat not engaging and
    with good engaging but got irrelevant
    imagination to get point across
    point across
    References Plenty of credibility, Only proper No citation and
    and current and detail citation or information from
    research with proper unreliable sources unreliable sources
    Information citation

    You might also like