Rubrics for Performance Task 1.

3-2
“Interview”

Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs

Improvement
20-16 15-11 10-6
5-0
Content Major points are Major points are Minor points are Topic is
presented and presented. presented. oversimplified or
fully supported However, some However, most fails to present
with convincing major points.
of them are not of them are not
arguments, ideas
and data. supported with supported with
convincing convincing
arguments, ideas arguments, ideas
and data and data
Validity of Language used The language is Poor selection of Language does not
makes the adequately used language to tie in with the
Information
message come to present the present the message. The
alive. The message. The message. The information
information information information presented is not
presented are presented is presented is accurate and valid.
adequately poorly accurate
accurate and
accurate and and valid.
valid
valid.
Meaningfulness The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation
is cohesive and has deep lacks meaning lacks
comprehensive meaning but with no meaning with no
with supporting little supporting supporting supporting
details. details. details.
details
Creativity The task shows The task shows The task shows The task has no
excellent average minor creativity creativity in design
creativity and in creativity in in design and in and in an organized
an organized design and in an an organized way.
way. organized way. way.
Punctuality The project was The project was The project was The project was not
submitted on submitted on submitted but submitted and
time with all the time but had a seems to be largely unfinished.
requirements few lacking slightly
satisfied. components incomplete.