*

* _

578


( )620 ( )125
.



.
] [1

.

: .

. .1
.2




-

1424 :
579
 2016 4 5

.
.











. .
. ] ]2
:
.
.
.
. :
.
:

. .
: .

1433 -1432.
:
( )125

.

580
 .
: ] ]3

.
:


].[8 .
: ] ]4
.
] ]9
:
. .
: ] ]5
.
.
. .
:

] ]10 : .
: .3
.
.
.
.
. .

].[6
:
] ]11 : ] ]7 :
. .
:

581
 2016 4 5

. .
. .
.
.
. .
: :

] [14:
-1 :


-2 . :
].[12
.
-3 :



. ()
-4 :
].[3
] ]13
.
-5 :
:

.
. :
-6 :
.

582
 .
. .4
] ]15

] ]18 :


]]16


.
. :
:

] ]17


:
:

] ]15
...
] ]17 ] ]18 ].[16

] ]15 .
:


] ]15
.
] ]17 :

583
 2016 4 5

.
.


.
. ] ]17

.
(1433-1432) ( )620.
-

( )200 .
( )125 .5
%20 .
1


2 .79 99 2
8 .20 26
0 .100 125

( 26) ( )%20.8 ( )1
. ( 99) ( )%79.2

2


2 .51 64
2 .47 59
6 .1 2
0 .100 125

( 59) ( )2
( )%47.2
() ( 64) ()%51.2
( )%1.6

584
 .



.
. :
:


( -
- ).
:

( )0001 ( )13
.
( )6 . ( )14
- : ()7
.

- :
" " ()0076 :
.
( .)0083 - 0058 (.)3
3


00575 1
00833 2
00690 3
00762

.5

:
:
( )4 .

585
 4





% % % %
1 .55 3.46 - - 2.4 3 49.2 61 48.4 60 12

.
2 .74 3.27 3.2 4 7.3 9 48.4 60 41.1 51 10
.
3 .83 3.22 3.3 4 15.6 19 36.9 45 44.3 54 6
.
4 .81 3.21 3.2 4 14.4 18 40.8 51 41.6 52 3

.
5 .60 3.14 - - 12.1 15 62.1 77 25.8 32 4

.
6 .94 3.06 6.5 8 21.8 27 30.6 38 41.1 51 13
.
7 .79 3.06 4.1 5 15.6 19 50.8 62 29.5 36 11


.
8 .75 2.95 3.2 4 21.0 26 53.2 66 22.6 28 7


.
9 .88 2.23 20.7 25 44.6 54 25.6 31 9.1 11 1

10 .77 2.15 19.4 24 49.2 61 28.2 35 3.2 4
9

.
11 .77 2.08 20.0 25 57.6 72 16.8 21 5.6 7 2
.
12 .78 2.08 23.0 28 54.1 66 18.0 22 4.9 6
8
.
13 .78 1.85 33.1 41 54.0 67 7.3 9 5.6 7 5

.
2.74

586
 ( )4
(
] ]12 )
( )2.74
. .
( )5 ( ( )12 (
) )
()1.85 ()3.46
( )0.78 ( )55.0


. ] ]16
( )4

( )2.08 - 2.15 8 2 9 1 :
.
(.(2.23 3.21 ( )10 (
: )
( )3.27
: ( )0.74

5





% % % %
1 .54 3.62 - - 2.4 3 33.3 41 64.2 79 3

.
2 .52 3.53 - - .8 1 45.2 56 54.0 67 1
.
3 .56 3.49 - - 3.2 4 44.4 55 52.4 65 9
.
4 .53 3.48 - - 1.6 2 48.8 60 49.6 61 8

587
 2016 4 5

.
5 .53 3.48 - - 1.6 2 49.2 61 49.2 61 12


.
6 .56 3.48 - - 3.2 4 46.0 57 50.8 63 13

.
7 .55 3.44 - - 2.4 3 51.2 63 46.3 57 11

.
8 .56 3.35 - - 4.0 5 57.3 71 38.7 48 10

.
9 .63 3.31 .8 1 6.5 8 53.2 66 39.5 49 14


.
10 .54 3.25 - - 4.9 6 65.0 80 30.1 37 5
.
11 .64 3.23 .8 1 8.9 11 56.5 70 33.9 42 7

.
12 .64 3.21 1.6 2 7.3 9 59.7 74 31.5 39 2
.

13 .68 3.14 .8 1 14.5 18 54.8 68 29.8 37 4

.
14 .79 2.96 4.8 6 18.5 23 52.4 65 24.2 30 6

.
3.35

] ]12 ( )5
(
: )
( )3.35
.
( )3 (

)

588
 ( )5 ( )3.62 ( )54.0

( )3.31 - 3.53 8 9 1 :
.14 10 11 13 12
] ]13
(.(2.96 3.25
:
.
:
6







% % % %
1 .66 3.28 .8 1 8.9 11 51.6 64 38.7 48 1
.
2 .83 3.18 1.6 2 21.8 27 33.9 42 42.7 53 2


3 .86 3.09 4.8 6 17.7 22 41.1 51 36.3 45 6

.
4 .63 3.08 1.6 2 11.3 14 64.5 80 22.6 28 7

.
5 .75 3.02 1.6 2 22.6 28 48.4 60 27.4 34 4
.

6 .76 2.95 1.6 2 26.6 33 46.8 58 25.0 31 3

.
7 .86 2.34 13.7 17 50.8 63 23.4 29 12.1 15 5
.
2.99

) ( )6
( )2.99 (

589
 2016 4 5

.
.2

. .
.3 ( )1 (
)
.
.4 ( )3.28
( )66.0


.
.5

.
.
. ( )6
] [1 2003( .) .
( )2.95 - 3.18 7 6 2 :
. .3 4
( )5 (
] [2 2002( .) .
)



( )2.34
.
( )86.0
] [3 1417( .) .

1
.
.
] [4 1987( .) .
.6
.
.1

590
] ]14 (1426) : ] ]6 (1426) :


. .

] ]15 (1431) . ] [7 (1414) . . 3

.

] [8 (1999) :
.

] ]16 (1430) . .

] ]9 (2004) .






.
.
] ]17
] ]10 ( 2008) .
1425( ) .
(

) .

. ] ]11 (2005) :

] ]18 (2000) .
2 .

] ]12 (1415) :

. 1
.
.
]5] Tylor, E. B. Primitive Culture. London: John ] ]13 (2007) .
Murray, 18.
2007/4/8 -7
.

591
 2016 4 5

THE ROLE OF SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT IN

THE REINFORCEMENT OF DIALOGUE
CULTURE AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL
STUDENTS FROM THE TEACHER'S POINT
OF VIEW OF ALSUWAIDI EDUCATIONAL
OFFICE IN RIYADH CITY
Fahad S. ALJIBREEN
Saudi Arabia
ABSTRACT_ This study aimed to identify the cultural background of the dialogue concept among
teachers. It also aimed to identify the role of school environment in the reinforcement of dialogue
culture among students, as well as to identify the obstacles of the culture reinforcement. The study
conducted with the descriptive surveyed approach, using a questionnaire as a tool to collect study
data. Study participants consist of (620) teachers in Secondary public schools from ALSUWAIDI
Educational Office in Riyadh city. The questionnaire has been applied at (125) teacher. Results
revealed the following: The mean of the cultural background of the dialogue concept among
teachers ranged between (1.85) and (3.46); as a result, the degree of the cultural background of
the dialogue concept among teachers is ranging between low, medium and high. The mean of the
role of school environment in the reinforcement of dialogue culture among students ranged
between (2.96) and (3.62); as a result, the degree of the role of school environment in the
reinforcement of dialogue culture among students is ranging between medium and high. The mean
of the obstacles of the culture reinforcement ranged between (2.34) and (3.28); as a result, the
degree of the obstacles of the culture reinforcement is ranging between low, medium and high. In
the light of the study results, it recommended the following: Providing a motivational educational
environment to hold a useful dialogue with the students. This can be achieved by reducing the
number of students inside classes, providing adequate training opportunities for secondary school
teachers, increasing the terms of reference of the curriculum granted for them. It also recommend
studying the importance of providing a course material related to ethics, skills, principles and
foundations of dialogue, as it has a deep impact on the personality of the student at the secondary
stage.
KEY WORDS: educational environment, cultural dialogue, reinforcement.

592