Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/233979061
CITATIONS READS
31 584
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by -Michele Trancossi- on 30 May 2014.
INTRODUCTION
Figure 1. Schematization of Newman case study
COANDA EFFECT ESSENTIALS
The Coanda effect can be described by few main physical The scientific studies about Coanda effect are characterized
parameters. Considering any two-dimensional Coanda flow by an important landmark paper. Newman [3] has
and referring to Figure 1, the main geometric parameters are investigated a two-dimensional, incompressible, turbulent jet
the angle of separation θ, the slot width b, radius of curvature flowing around a circular cylinder. The experimental set used
a. Physical parameters are Reynolds number Re and the by Newman is shown in Figure 1. It has demonstrated that
pressure differential ps − p∞, (where ps is the supply Coanda adhesion to a curved surface is a direct consequence
pressure). of the balance of the forces applied on the fluid. During
adhesive motion on a curved wall, they are centrifugal force
Different fluid dynamic effects concur to create the so called and radial pressure. As the jet exit from the slot, the contact
“Coanda effect” which has been defined by Coanda since pressure with the curved wall is lower than ambient pressure
1910 although still in an embryonic formulation [1]. In because of the presence of viscous drag phenomena which
particular it has been completely formulated in 1936 [2] as are generated by the interaction of the fluid and the curved
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
• when blowing ratios is below 0.1 the primary jet has a low
ENHANCED COANDA EFFECT WITH influence by Coanda surfaces and centerline velocity
CONTROL JETS decreases due to entrainment of the secondary flow;
This expression is useful for an initial approach of a single jet • when blowing ratios are above 0.1 the main jet has vectored
Coanda adhesion. In real viscous flows the engagement of the in a radial direction and it has not the behavior of a free jet. If
fluid jet with a curved wall cause an increased jet thickness the blowing ratio increases the vectoring capability increases.
proceeding along the contact with a decrease of mean
velocity, because of an adverse pressure gradient. Mean Some interesting patents have been also presented by Smith,
velocity decreases while surface pressure along the wall forcing the typical Juvet architecture into three dimensional
increases and eventually equals the ambient pressure. When architectures [8, 9], which are widely described by Allen [10,
p0= p∞, the flow separates from the curved surface [5]. 11].
Therefore, inviscid flows may attach themselves according to
the balance of centrifugal forces, but viscous effects are the ENHANCED COANDA JETS WITH
cause for jet separation from the curved wall.
MOVING SURFACES
Other more effective system to produce an enhanced Coanda Many authors, especially involved in aeronautic propulsion
effect is the one passed on the pilot jet. It is based on the has developed Coanda deflection systems based on moving
testing architecture developed both by A. K. Postma, J. D. surfaces and on pilot jet controlled applications with movable
Smith and D. S. Trent [6], and Juvet [7]. This architecture is appendices. Wing [12] has focused on two-dimensional thrust
named by Smith as Enhanced Coanda Effect [8]. vectoring of a primary jet using a secondary jet deflected via
a Coanda surface (Figure 3). His experimental results appear
largely unsatisfactory producing a maximum jet deflection
about 6°. Wing concluded that the result was influenced by a
lack of momentum in the primary jet and that the nozzle
design would require a better optimization to produce larger
vectoring angles.
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
supposed that Mach number is lower than 0.3 that means that This equation can be demonstrated by Reynolds Transport
the fluid can be considered incompressible. Theorem and is similar to the conservation of mass equation.
It presents an added velocity term in each integral and the
In particular the basic idea is constituted by the need of sum is equal to the complete system the applied forces.
nozzle which can permit to produce a dynamic and reversible Physically, the linear momentum equation states that the sum
outlet angle of a synthetic jet. The following symmetric of all forces applied on the control volume is equal to the sum
architecture has been evaluated as a generic model of dual jet of the rate of change of momentum inside the control volume
Coanda nozzles. In particular Figure 5 shows the main and the net flux of momentum through the control surface.
parameter used to study the system.
For steady flow, the first term on the right hand side vanishes.
The system is constituted by two fluid primary jets
designated 1 and 2 entering the nozzle at the section The sign of the force and velocity vectors ( and ) depends
designated as A. These streams flows inside two ducts on the assigned coordinate system and the sign on the
separated by a separation septum, which ends before the
separates and two sections can be indicated quantity depends on the velocity as well as the
orientation of the control surface. The unit normal vector is
defined as positive when pointing out of the control surface.
(3)
where is the velocity vector, is the outward unit normal 3. at outlet 3, both the velocity and unit normal vector are in
vector, and represents the sum of all forces (body and the positive x-direction, hence is positive (V3).
surface forces) applied to the control volume.
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
(5)
(6)
THEORETICAL DESCRIPTION OF
THE MIXING PROCESS
If the inlet and outlet are flat surfaces, and it can be assumed
the velocity is uniform across the surfaces. This reduces the
equation to the Forces on the Control Volume (rewritten in
terms of x-, y- and z-components),
it is possible to obtain:
(9)
(8)
Walls are described as Adiabatic Stationary Walls / No Slip, This novel definition of dimensionless ratio of momentum
and environmental pressure as been imposed 101325 Pa. help to describe the behavior of the presented nozzle and has
the great advantage to assume both positive and negative
The turbulence models used are three: Spalart-Almaras (1 values, which can help into the description of a symmetric
eqn.), k-ε (2 eqn.) standard with enhanced wall treatment and nozzle such as the one presented in this paper.
pressure gradient effects, and Reynolds Stress with enhanced
wall treatment. The obtained results using the considered CFD STEADY SIMULATIONS
turbulence models are nearly equal and present only A campaign of CFD simulations have been performed,
negligible differences. considering 2D planar nozzle geometry is represented in
Figure 9. This simulation has been realized for different mass
PARAMETERS USED FOR flows to define a parametric model independent from
INTERPRETATION OF CFD RESULTS geometry.
These equations cannot properly describe the mixing nozzle Turbulence model used are both a Spalart-Almaras and a k-ε
and, in particular, the adhesive model to the Coanda surface. with enhanced wall treatment option. Results are defined for
Bradshaw equation (2) can be expressed as a function of main different overall mass flows from 6 kg/s to 10 kg/s and fluid
geometric parameters that influences the adhesion. is air considered as an ideal gas in standard conditions.
An important parameter to describe the above nozzle can be An example of the results of CFD simulations is reported in
the mass flow rate of the incoming primitive jets and in Figure 10, 11 and 12. These graphics represent the deflection
particular the dimensionless ratio of mass flow rates angle as a function of the dimensionless terms ṁ * and J* as
described below: defined in equations (9) and (10).
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
Figure 9. Example of simulations realized using air modeled as an ideal gas (with mdot3 = 8 kg/s)
Figure 10. Example of results of simulations with air modeled as an ideal gas (with mdot3 = 8 kg/s and an inlet overpressure of
4000 Pa); sinusoidal approximation of a (ṁ *).
Figure 11. Example of results of simulations with air modeled as an ideal gas (with mdot3 = 8 kg/s and an inlet overpressure of
4000 Pa); rational approximation of a (ṁ * ).
Figure 12. Example of results of simulations with air modeled as an ideal gas (with mdot3 = 8 kg/s and an inlet overpressure of
4000 Pa); rational approximation of a (J*).
The equation that represents the problem as a function of The main uncertainly source is constituted by the nature of
momentums is reported below (13): CFD related experiments itself and is due to ideal conditions
in which the CFD simulations are realized and the turbulence
model adopted. Two different turbulence calculation methods
(Spalart-Almaras; k-ε with enhanced wall treatment;
(13) Reynolds stress, with air considered as an ideal gas) produce
comparable results. The produced work aims to demonstrate
Other simulation where performed for different mass flow that a so made dual jet almost planar nozzle can work.
rates and similar approximating function are obtained. Also
simulations on other geometries are performed. With the considered mass flows and the considered fluid the
CFD results appears to be very interesting because the time
requested for dynamic stabilization of fluid flow are less than
CFD TRANSIENT SYMULATIONS two tenths of a second. In particular Figure 11 shows with a
Dynamic conditions have been tested too. A sample testing time step of 2/100 s the evolution of the jet from the
using total mass flow of 6 kg/s has been reported in Figure condition mdot2 = 5 kg/s and mdot1 = 1 kg/s. The same
14. simulation has been realized in different cases.
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
Figure 13. Dynamic example with mass from mass flow inlets which changes from 1 kg/s and 5 kg/s to 3kg/s and 3 kg/s (frame
captured with a 2/100 s step)
The same tests have been developed for different mass flow This nozzle can apply to the following minimal list of
values, obtaining similar results till for low speeds. possible applications:
It has been verified that the vectoring performance in terms of 1. ship and aircraft propulsion systems;
vector angle can be described as a function of the momentum 2. technological systems, painting, thin film deposition and
flux ratio for various mass flow inlet values. The vectoring powder on mechanical parts;
angle of the primary jet is a strong function of the
dimensionless mass flow inlet (6) and dimensionless 3. technological facilities for superficial treatments of
momentum flux ratio (7). The angle is zero when both mass mechanical parts with particle injection;
flow inlets and momentums are the same and the angle and
generally increases with momentum ratio to a maximum 4. industrial washing and cleaning jet of food and / or
before either decreasing slightly or becoming asymptotic. industrial products;
It applies to different cases and different industrial 8. ventilation systems, air conditioning and heating;
applications, different both for nature and field of application.
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
Figure 14. Dynamic example with mass from mass flow inlets which changes from 1 kg/s and 5 kg/s to 5 kg/s and 1 kg/s (frame
captured with a 2/100 s step)
9. Fire Protection Systems with jet fluids that can be easily nozzle and a propulsive system constituted by two 56 mm,
oriented directly on the flame; RC model turbofans.
This nozzle allows varying the direction of the jet dryer This system can be used in different configuration on
improving the efficiency of the system without the necessity traditional planes, both for shortening take off and landing
of any moving parts reducing the costs of any kind of operations and for enhancing vehicle maneuverability It
directional jet system. It eliminates moving parts, thus to seems also promising the application on innovative
increase the overall affordability of the applications reducing distributed propulsion systems on unconventional airplanes
costs of any orienting jet device or machine. and in particular on small UAVs.
The present nozzle can be useful in aerial propulsion to Two possible explicative examples are schematized in figure
define a new family of jet propellers with jet deflection. This 16 and 17. A specific version for small UAVs has been
innovative application can produce a novel concept of jet presented into another paper [16], which also presents a
deflection systems such as A.C.H.E.O.N. (Aerial Coanda model of the nozzle using a small electric engine and
High Efficiency Orienting-jet Nozzle), which has been directions for further developments of this idea.
presented into another paper [16].
The range of speeds and dimensions tested at the present
In particular, this system leads by simulation to produce a jet stage of development of the HOMER nozzle, are in particular
deflection over 30° using a non optimized geometry of the suitable for small UAVs applications and further
developments could also regard general aircrafts. Further
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
Figure 15. Possible application of the H.O.M.E.R. nozzle to a F.15 like fighter for enhancing directional horizontal movements.
Figure 16. Possible architecture on Boeing 747 architecture to enhance take off and landing performances
developments could also regard the study of the system and 4. Bradshaw, P., “Effects of Streamline Curvature on
an accurate trajectory analysis during flight. Turbulent Flow,” AGARDograph, 1990, AGARDograph
AG-169;
REFERENCES 5. Postma, A. K., Smith, J. D. and Trent, D. S., Development
1. Coanda, H., US Patent n. 3,261,162, Lifting Device of a Concept for a High Capacity Pneumatic Conveying
Coanda Effect, 1936, USA; System Employing a Fluid Attachment Device for Use in
Underground Excavation, Final Technical Report, US Bureau
2. Coanda, H., US Patent # 2,052,869, Device for Deflecting of Mines, 1973;
a Stream of Elastic Fluid Projected into an Elastic Fluid,
1936; 6. Juvet, P. J. D., Control of High Reynolds Number Round
Jets, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
3. Newman, B. G., The Deflexion of Plane Jets by Adjacent Stanford University, 1993.
Boundaries, in Coanda Effect, Boundary Layer and Flow
Control, edited by Lachmann, G. V., Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, 7. Allen, D. S. and Smith, B. L., “Axisymmetric Coanda-
Oxford, 1961, pp. 232-264; assisted vectoring,” submitted to Exp. Fluids, December,
2007.
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
Ac s
area of control exit slot [m2] step height
Ap u
area of primary exit slot velocity
B λ
secondary jet exit slot width; exit slot width of control slot circumference / primary slot
systems involving one Coanda jet circumference
CSM ν
Coanda-assisted spray manipulation kinematic viscosity
d Φ
distance between slots in parallel jets vector angle
Gratis copy for Michele Trancossi
Copyright 2012 SAE International
E-mailing, copying and internet posting are prohibited
Downloaded Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:47:54 PM
ρ
fluid density
Θ
rotation direction of vectored jet; angle downstream
on curved surface
θsep
separation angle in previous studies
The Engineering Meetings Board has approved this paper for publication. It has Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not
successfully completed SAE's peer review process under the supervision of the session necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the paper.
organizer. This process requires a minimum of three (3) reviews by industry experts. SAE Customer Service:
Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a
Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA)
retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, Fax: 724-776-0790
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. Email: CustomerService@sae.org
ISSN 0148-7191 SAE Web Address: http://www.sae.org
Printed in USA