Graph

Test 1; Pump efficiency for 50 %, N = 1439 rpm, ω = 150.692 rad/s

hp, (m) Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

7

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)

Graph 1: Graph of Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 1

Ẇshaft, (kW) Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 2: Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 1
ɳ (100%) Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q
40

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 3: Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 1
Test 2; Pump efficiency for 75 %, N = 2178 rpm, ω = 228.08 rad/s

hp, (m) Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

16

14

12

10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Q (m /s), (x10-3)
3

Graph 4: Graph of Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 2

Ẇshaft, (kW) Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 5: Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 2
ɳ (100%) Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q
45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 6: Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 2
Test 3; Pump efficiency for 100 %, N = 2945 rpm, ω = 308.40 rad/s

hp , (m) Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

30

25

20

15

10

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 7: Graph of Head Performance, hp vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 3

Ẇshaft, (kW) Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)

Graph 8: Shaft Power, Ẇshaft vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 3
ɳ (100%) Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q
60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Q (m3/s), (x10-3)
Graph 9: Efficiency, ɳ vs. Volume Flow Rate, Q for Test 3