You are on page 1of 2

SYBOLIC INTERACTION THEORY/ SYMBOLIC o Self- refers to an individual’s

INTERCTIONISM ability to reflect on the way


that the individual is perceive
 It is a frame of reference to better
by others.
understand how individuals interact to
o Society- where all interactions
one another to create symbolic
are taking place.
worlds, and in return, how these
worlds shape individual behaviors.
 A framework that helps understand
 HERBERT BLUMMER
how society is preserved and created
o is a student of Mead coined
through repeated interactions
the term and put forward an
between individuals.
influential summary
 Individuals act on the premise of a
 “People act a certain
shared understanding and meaning
way towards things
within their social context.
based on the meaning
 The interpretation process that occurs
those things already
between interactions help create and
have, and these
recreate meaning.
meanings are derived
from social interaction
and modified through
 Derive form the American philosophy interpretation.”
of pragmatism
 “Most human and
 GEORGE HERBERT MEAD and humanizing activity
CHARLES HORTON COOLEY that people engage in
is talking to each
 Mead argued that people’s selves are other.”
social products, but that these selves
are also purposive and creative, and  Human groups are
believed that the true test of any created by people and
theory was that it was useful in solving it is only actions
complex social influence. between them that
define a society.
 Mind, Self and Society- book published
by the students of Mead  Through interaction,
individuals are able to
 The handbook of symbolic “produce common
interactionism. symbols by approving,
arranging, and
 Concepts of Social interactionism redefining them.

o Mind- an individual’s ability to  ASSUMPTIONS


use symbols to create o Physical reality does indeed
meanings for the world exist by an individual’s social
around the individuals- definitions.
individuals use language and o social understanding of
thought to accomplish this reality. (they respond to this
goal. reality indirectly through a
kind of filter which consist of interaction among individuals
individual’s perspectives.) but also interaction within the
o human exist not in the individual.
physical space composed of o Humans do not sense their
realities, but in the “world” environment directly, instead
composed only of “objects” humans define the situation
 THREE ASSUMPTIONS FRAME OF they are in. An environment
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM. may actually exist, but it is our
definition of it that is
o Individuals construct meaning important.
via the communication o The cause of human action is
process. the result of what is occurring
o Self-concept is a motivation of in our present situation. Cause
behavior unfolds in the present social
o A unique relationship exists interaction, present thinking
between the individual and and present definition.
society. o Human beings are described
as active beings in relation to
 THREE PREMISES THAT ARE DERIVED their environment.
FROM THE ASSUMPTIONS
o PREMISE 1: Humans act  CRITICISMS
toward things on the basis of o For being overly impressionistic
the meanings they ascribe to in their research methods and
those things. unsystematic in their theories.
o PREMISE 2: The meaning o Lack of testability
of such things is derived from, o To broad and general when
or arises out of, the social they are seeking specific
interaction that one has with theories.
the others and the society. o Theoretical framework rather
o PREMISE 3: The meanings are than a theory.
handled in, and modified
through, an interpretative
process used by the person in
dealing with the things he/she
encounters.

 FIVE CENTRAL IDEAS by Joel M.


Charon “Symbolic Interactionism an
Interpretation, An Integration”
o Human being must be
understood as a social person.
It is the constant search for
social interaction that lead us
to do what we do.
o That human being must be
understood as thinking being.
Human action is not only

You might also like