INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : PHILIP DAYA CRUZ Name of Rater : TACIANA RUBI M. TIBURCIO
Position : MASTER TAECHER II Position : MASTER TAECHER I
Review Period : MAY 2016 TO APRIL 2017 Date of Review : NOVEMBER 2016
Bureau / Center / Service / Division : LAGUNA

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PER ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE.

QUALITY
Basic PROFESSIONAL 1. Conducts at least one 15% 5 - Effectively completed,adopted, & utilized, found to be effective
Education GROWTH AND (1) classroom based June to to remedy the problems/issues in the classroom/school.
Services DEVELOPMENT action research to March 4- Completed, adopted, & utilized, found less effective, utilized,
30% remedy problems & 2017 found less effective issues in the classroom/school.
issues in a school 3 - Completed but found not effective to remedy the problems/issues
during the year. in the classroom/school
2- Approved proposal but not conducted
1- Made proposal but not approved.
EFFICIENCY
5- Action Research had complete entries of the required contents
and neatly written
4- Action Research had 1 incomplete entry of the required contents
3- Action Research had 2 incomplete entries of the required contents
2- Action Research had 3 incomplete entries of the required contents
1- Action Research had 4-5 incomplete entries of the required entries.
TIMELINESS
5- Submitted an action research proposal earlier than the opening of
classes of the current school year
4- Submitted an action research proposal from June to August of the
current school year
3- Submitted an action research proposal from September to October
of the current school year
2- Submitted an action research proposal from November to December
of the current school year
1- Submitted an action research proposal from January to March of the
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
WEIGHT PER ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE.

2. Serves as June to QUALITY, EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS

demonstration teacher, March 15% 5 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person and ######5 5
facilitator,resource 2017 shared effective teaching techniques and strategies.
person within the school 4 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person but
year. slightly shared effective teaching techniques and strategies.
3 - Served as demonstration teacher, facilitator, resource person but
never shared effective teaching techniques and strategies.
2 - Just served as demonstration teacher
1 - Never served any of the the activities given and did not share anything

INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY and EFFICIENCY

Basic COMPETENCE 1. Accounts learning outcomes June to 5- 75% to 100% met all the targets. ###### 5
Education 40% vis-à-vis goals and targets. March 4- 65% to 74% met all the targets.
Services 2017 20% 3- 55% to 64% met all the targets.
Targets: 2- 45% to 54% met all the targets
MPS in Quarterly Test-75% 1- 44% and below met all the targets.
Participation Rate - 95% TIMELINESS
Completion Rate - 85% 5- Results submitted with analysis before target date ### ###5
4- Results submitted with analysis on target date
3- Results submitted with analysis after target date
2- Results submitted with analysis but 1 month late target date
1- Results did not submit anymore

QUALITY and EFFICIENCY

2. Provides technical June to
assistance to teachers March
to increase the target 2017
MPS for every quarter.
5 - 100% of the target teachers given TA
4- 75% of the target teachers given TA 4 4 4
20% 3 - 50% of the target teachers given TA
2- 25% of the target teachers given TA
1- None of the target teachers given TA
TIMELINESS
5- Results submitted with analysis before the target date
4- Results submitted with analysis on target date 4 4 4
3- Results submitted with analysis after target date
2- Results submitted with analysis but 1 month late target date
1- Results did not submit anymore
1- Results did not submit anymore
 TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
WEIGHT PER ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE.
QUALITY
Basic INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Observes 30 June to 10% 5- Teachers observed with pre and post conference, with teacher
Education SUPERVISION teachers in the school March observation reports resulting to improving teaching competencies.
Services with pre and post 2017 4- Teachers observed with pre and post conference with teacher
20% conference within the observation reports but moderately improving teaching competencies. 4
Year. 3- Teachers observed with pre and post conference with teacher
observation reports but slightly improving teaching competencies.
2- Teachers observed with pre and post conference but no teacher
observation reports and no improvement in teaching competencies.
1- Teachers just observed
EFFICIENCY
5- 100% of the target number of teachers was observed
4- 75% of the target number of teachers was observed ###
3- 50% of the target number of teachers was observed
2- 25% of the target number of teachers was observed
1- None of the target number of teachers was observed
TIMELINESS
5 - Submit observation reports before due date. 5
4 -Submit observation reports before due date
3 -Submit observation reports after due date.
2 - Submit observation reports after 5 days of due date.
1- Never submit observation reports

2. Conducts mentoring/ QUALITY

coaching activities June to 10% 5 - Outstandingly mentored/coached the teachers and highly
to ______ grade _____ March improve the teaching-learning process .
teachers quarterly. 2017 4 - Very satisfactorily mentored/coached the teachers and moderately 4
improve the teaching-learning process.
3 - Satisfactorily mentored and coached the teachers and slightly
improve the teaching-learning process.
2- Unsatisfatorily mentored/coached the teachers and no improvement
happened in teaching-learning process.
1- Never conducted mentoring and coaching activities.
EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
5 - Accomplished 100% of the target per quarter
4- Accomplished 75% of the target per quarter 4
3 - Accomplished 50% of the target per quarter
2- Accomplished 25% of the target per quarter
 1- None

TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT PER ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRA's OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE.
QUALITY , EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
PLUS FACTOR 1. Receives awards and June to 5- Received special awards in National Level during the SY
recognitions within a March 5% 4- Received special awards in Regional Level during the SY
year. 2017 3- Received special awards in Division Level during the SY
2- Received special awards in District Level during the SY
1- Received special awards in School Level during the SY

1. Initiates programs and QUALITY , EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS

PLUS FACTOR projects that will enhance June to
the curriculum using
localized materials every
quarter.
5 - Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum
March 5% and its delivery and lead to 100% of the teachers to use localized
2017 materials in teaching.
4 - Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum
and its delivery and lead to 75% of the teachers to use localized
materials in teaching.
3- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum
and its delivery and lead to 50% of the teachers to use localized
materials in teaching.
2- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum
and its delivery and lead to 25% of the teachers to use localized
materials in teaching.
1- Initiated programs and projects which enhanced the curriculum
and its delivery and lead to 0% of the teachers to use localized
materials in teaching.
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

APPROVED:

Rater Ratee

_______________________________
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : DARIUS S. CENTENO Name of Rater: Ruth Tatlonghari

Position : ______________________ Position: Master Teacher I
Review Period : APRIL 2016-2017 Date of Review: April 12, 2017
Bureau/Center/ Service/Division: CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CABUYAO

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DUR

Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q E T
Basic A. Teaching- 1. Facilitates learning in the elementary June 2016 QUALITY and TIMELINESS 5 5 4
Education Learning /secondary through functional daily to 5- Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge
Services Process lesson plans, logs and use of March 2017 15% using innovative teaching strategies is highly evident.
30% innovative teaching strategies. 4- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is very satisfactorily evident.
3- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is satisfactorily evident.
2- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is fairly evident.
1- Delivered updated content knowledge using innovative
teaching strategies is not evident.
EFFICIENCY
5- 96-100% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
4- 86-95% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
3- 76-85% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
2- 66-75% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies.
1- below-65% individual and group activities were provided
that are alligned with the competencies
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DUR
Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q E T
2. Demonstrates value for learning June 2016 QUALITY
through being careful about the to 15% 5- discipline in the classroom was highly evident 3 3 3
effect of ones' behavior on March 2017 4- discipline in the classroom was satisfactorily evident
learners. 3- discipline in the classroom was fairly evident
2 - discipline in the classroom was less evident
1- discipline in the classroom was not evident
EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
5- 100% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
by the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines
4- 76-99% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines.
3- 51-75% of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules , regulations and guidelines.
2- 26-50 % of the learners maintained discipline guided by
the classrooms rules, regulations and guidelines
1- 25% and below of the learners maintained discipline
guided by the classrooms rules ,regulations and
guidelines.

Basic B. Student's 1. Develops and uses a variety of QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
Education Outcomes appropriate assessment strategies June 2016 15% 5- All outputs in assessment were monitored, evaluated 4 3 4
Services 30% to monitor and evaluate learning. to and maintained
March 2017 4- Only 4 of the outputs were monitored, evaluated and
maintained
3- Only 3 of the outputs indicated were monitored,
evaluated and maintained
2- Only 2 of the outputs indicated were monitored
evaluated and maintained
1- Only 1 of the outputs indicated was monitored,
evaluated and maintained
 TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DUR
Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q E T
QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
2. Accounts learning outcomes vis-à-vis June 2016 5- 75% to 100% met all the targets. 4 4 4
goals and targets. to 15% 4- 65% to 74% met all the targets.
March 2017 3- 55% to 64% met all the targets.
Targets: 2- 45% to 54% met all the targets
MPS in Quarterly Assessment- 75% 1- 44% and below met all the targets.
Participation Rate - 95%
Completion Rate - 85%

QUALITY
Basic C. Community 1. Establish learning environment that June 2016 5- 100% accomplishment with set agreements met 4 4 4
Education Involvement responds to the aspiration of the to 10% 4- 85% of planned meetings conducted producing only
Services community. March 2017 set agreements and partial accomplishment of these.
20% 3- 75% of planned meetings conducted producing only set
agreements
2- 50% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results
1- 25% and below of planned meetings conducred with
no results.
EFFICIENCY
5- 5 or more PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
4- 4 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
3- 3 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
2- 2 PTA meetings/conferences were conducted
1- 1 PTA meeting/conferences were conducted
TIMELINESS
5- Conducted meetings/conferences on time
4- Conducted meetings/conferences 15 minutes late
3- Conducted meetings/conferences 30 minutes late
2- Conducted meetings/conferences 1 hour late
 1- Never conducted meetings /conferences

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DUR

Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q E T
2. Undertake/initiate at least four (4) QUALITY
projects/ events/activities such as June 2016 10% 5- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and 5 5 5
- feeding program to activities as chairman with documentation
- clean-up drive March 2017 4- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and
- tree planting activities as co-chairman with documentation
- sports and festival 3- Actively undertaken and initiated projects,events and
within the rating period. activities as member with documentation
2- Just attended the activity with documentation
1- Just attended the activity without any documentation
EFFICIENCY
5- 4 activities were undertaken and initiated
4- 3 activities were undertaken and initiated
3- 2 activities were undertaken and initiated
2- 1 activity was undertaken and initiated
1 - None
TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports
Basic Professional 1. Allocates time for personal growth QUALITY
Education Growth and and professional development through June 2016 5- 100% accomplishment with complete documentation 4 4 4
Services Development participation in educational seminars to 10% 4- 100% accomplishment with incomplete documentation
and workshops, reading educational March 2017 3- 75% accomplishment with complete documentation
10% materials regularly and conduct at 2- 50% accomplishment with complete documentation
least one classroom based Action 1- 25% accomplishment with complete documentation
Research. EFFICIENCY & TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
 4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DUR
Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO's KRAS OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Performance Indicators
Per KRA Q E T
1. Received special awards/citation/ QUALITY
Plus Factor recognition for exemplary performance June 2016 5% 5- Received special awards in National Level 1 4 4
as coach/trainer, resource speaker, to 4- Received special awards in Regional Level
facilitator and others. March 2017 3- Received special awards in Division Level
2- Received special awards in District Level
1- Received special awards in School Level
EFFICIENCY
5- 4 or more awards received
4- 3 awards received
3- 2 awards received
2- 1 awards received
1 - None
TIMELINESS
5- Accomplishment reports submitted before due date
4- Accomplishment reports submitted on due date
3- Accomplishment reports submitted after due date
2- Accomplishment reports submitted a week after due date
1 - Never submitted accomplishment reports
2. Conducted remediation program to QUALITY , EFFICIENCY and TIMELINESS
Plus Factor ___ slow learners and enrichment June 2016 5% 5- 100% of the target performance indicators were met 2 2 2
programs to ____ average and talented to 4- 75% of the target performance indicators were met
learners to improve performance March 2017 3- 50% of the target performance indicators were met
indicators before end of the school year. 2- 25% of the target performance indicators were met
1- 0 % of the target performance indicators were met

100%
Ruth Tatlonghari DARIUS S. CENTENO
MT II Teacher I
APPROVED:
MARITES O. ISL
Principal
ORM

h Tatlonghari
ster Teacher II
il 12, 2017

O BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

TUAL RESULT
Rating Score
AVE.
4.67 4.67 0.70
O BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TUAL RESULT
Rating Score
AVE.

3.00 3.00 0.45

3.67 3.67 0.55

O BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TUAL RESULT
Rating Score
AVE.

4.00 4.00 0.60

4.00 4.00 0.40

O BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TUAL RESULT
Rating Score
AVE.

5.00 5.00 0.50

4.00 4.00 0.40

O BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
TUAL RESULT
Rating Score
AVE.

3.00 3.00 0.15

2.00 2.00 0.10

3.85
OVERALL
RATING FOR VS
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
ARITES O. ISLETA, Ed.D.
Principal III