ENGLISH REVIEWER

Public speaking
- DELIVERING A SPEECH INFRONT OF AN AUDIENCE
- SPEAKER COMMUNICATES THEIR IDEAS
1.PERSONALITY
- PERSON’S PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, & MENTAL QUALITIES
2.INTELLIGENCE
- AFFECTS THE KIND OF SPEECH
- CONTENT & ORGANIZATION OF THE SPEECH
- HOW IT’S DELIVERED?
3.GLOSSOPHOBIA
- FEAR OF PUBLIC SPEAKING

Techniques in Public speaking

1.PREPARE YOUR SPEECH
- REASEARCH YOUR SPEECH

2.PRECTICE WHAT YOU WILL SAY

- PRACTICE IT UNTIL YOU MEMORIZED IT BY HEART

3.KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE

- FIND OUT THEIR KNOWING THEIR BACKGROUNDS

 WHAT WILL YOUR AUDIENCE BE?

- THEIR GENDER - INTEREST
- AGE RANGE - RELIGION
- NATIONALITY

4.KNOW THE VENUE

- CHECK OUT THE LOCATION WHERE YOUR SPEECH WILL BE DELIVERED

5.RELAX
- SO YOU WON’T BE PANIKING AVOID PRACTICING TOO MUCH

6.BE THE AUTHORITY

- YOU NEED TO CONFIDENTLY SHOW WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

7.TALKS TO YOUR AUDIENCE

- COMMUNICATION W/ YOUR AUDIENCES

ETHICS OF Public speaking

1.PREPARE WELL FOR THE SPEECH
- DO IT EARLIER
2.DON’T OFFEND ANYONE
- MAKE YOUR SPEECH POSITIVE AND BE SENSITIVE
3.FOLLOW THE TIME ALLOTTED TO
YOU
- TO PAY RESPECTS TO OTHER SPEAKERS
4.TURN OFF ANY GADJET IN YOUR
POSSESSION
- SO THAT IT WON’T BE DISTRACTING
5.GREET THE AUDIENCE PROPERLY
- GREET THEM W/ HIGH HONOR
6.REFLECT WHAT YOU SAY
- YOU SHOULD KNOW WHAT YOU SAY
7.OBSERVE CORRECT PROXIMITY
- BUILD SOME CONNECTION W/ YOUR AUDIENCE
8.PRESENT INFO W/ RELIABLE SOURCES
- TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU STATE THE FACTS AND SOURCES
9.PROVIDE CONCLUSION
- DON’T LEAVE THE AUDIENCE HANGING
10. WALK THE TALK
- KNOW WHAT TO DO
 LITERATURE
 WORLD LITERATURE
- LITERATURE ALL OVER THE WORLD
1.BIBLE
- WORLD’S MOST WIDELY – READ BOOKS
- HAS WIDE ASSORTMENT OF LITERATURE
2.GREEK LITERATURE
- EARLY 1ST MILLENIUM BC
- WORKS OF ANCIENT GREECE ( GREATEST ACHEIVEMENTS OF WESTERN
LITERATURE)
3.CLASSIC LITERATURE
- ANCIENT GREECE AND ROME
- PERIOD NOTABLE FOR THE EXCELLENCE AND ENDURING QUALITY OF
IT’S WRITERS’ WORK
4.ANCEINT GREEK LITERATURE
- SMALL PROPORTION SURVUVES
- ARCHAIC, CLASSICAL AND HELLENISTIC/ GRECO ROMAN
5.ARCHAIC PERIOD
- STORED W/ OTRATURE

EPICS
- POEMS THAT FOCUSES ON A HERO AND HIS BATTLES, DEEDS AND
ALONG THE NARRATIVE POEM
1.ILIAD
- QUESTS AND EXPLOITS OF A HERO
- INVOCATION TO THE MUSE
- EN MEDIAS RES
- EPIC SMILES AND EPTHEUS
- DIVINE INTERVENTION
- LENGHTY MONOLOGUES AND SOLILOQUES
- CHARTS AND DATYLIC HEXAMETER
- 24 BOOKS DIVIDED W/ LOGICAL PAUSES
 EXAMPLES
- HECTOR AND ANDROMACHE’S PARTING
- DEATH OF HECTOR
- KING’S PRIOM’S PLEAS FOR THE RETURN OF HECTOR’S BODY

 ILIAD AND ODYSSEY

- GREEK SOCIAL SYSTEMS, POLITICS, MYTHICAL AND RELIGIOUS
PRACTICES ARE CAPTURE
- MAN’S EXISTENCE TO PUT TO REST
- MAN’S UNDYING SPIRIT AND QUEST
- HONOR AND GLORY
- PORTRAYED DEUS EX MACHINA (MACHINATION OF THE GOD)

PERSUASIVE ESSAY

 PERSUASION
- ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCEA PERSON’S BELIE, THOUGHTS OR OPINIONS

 PERSUSAIVE TEST
- USED TO CONVINCE OR INFLUENCE OTHERS TO DO OR BELIEVE IN
SOMETHING THAT YOU ALSO DO OR BELIEVE IN
 POINT
- DISCUSS ON ISSUE
- MUST INCLUDE WRITER’S POSISTION N THE PARTICULAR ISSUE
- MUST INCLUDE SUPPORTING DETAILS TO PROVE WRITER’S ARGUMENT
 REASONS OF FAVOR OF THE ARGUMENT
 EVIDENCES IN THE FORM OF STATISTICS, HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND, AND SAMPLE SCENARIOUS
- MUST CALL FOR ACTION
 WRITING PERSUASIVE TEST

 THESIS STATEMENT
- STAND

 REASONS OR SUPPORTING DETAILS

- EVIDENCES
 STATISTICS
 SAMPLE SCENARIOS (REASONABLE AND LOGICAL)
 ARTICLE (JOURNALS, NEWSPAPER, EDUCATIONAL, MAGAZINE)
 INTERVIEWS
 SURVEYS
 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (BOOKS/ ARCHIVES)
 FACTS
  OPPOSING ARGUMENTS
- STATEMENTS THAT ARE AGAINST THAT POSITION OF THE WRITER

 REFUTE
- TO PROVE THE OPPOSING SIDE’S ARGUMENT WRONG
 REASONS TO WRITE OPPOSING ARGUMENTS

1.AWARENESS OF 2.ARGUMENT’S
ALL SIDES STRENGTH
MODALS
- HELPING VERBS COMBINED W/ OTHER VERBS TO INDICATE MOOD
OR TENSE

CAN COULD
POSSIBILITY AND ABILITY POSSIBILITY AND ABILITY
INFORMAL REQUEST OR ORDER A FORMAL REQUEST OR ORDER
ASK PERMISSION
MAY MIGHT
EXPRESS POSSIBILITY POSSIBILITY (OUCOME IS UNLIKELY)
FORMALLY ASK PERMISSION TO EXPRESS A PAST POSSIBILITY
ASK PERMISSION EXPRESS EVENTS THAT COULD HAVE
HAPPENED BUT DIDN’T
WILL WOULD
FUTURE CONDITION PAST TENSE OF WILL
REQUEST OR DEMAND(LESS POLITE REQUEST(MORE POLITE)
PROMISE CONDITION
INSTANT DESCISION HABITS IN THE PAST
PREDICTION
MUST OUGHT TO
NECESSITY ADVICE
POSSIBILITY/ CERTAINTY LOGICAL DEDUCTION
STRONG ADVICE/ RECOMMENDATION
PROHIBITION
SHALL SHOULD
FUTURE ACTION ADVICE
SUGGESTION OBLIGATION
EXPRESS EXPECTATION
 EMPHASIS MARKERS

 ADDITION
- SMOOTH TRANSITION OF THE IDEAS IN SENTENCES IN
PARAGRAPH
TO ADD AND TOO, ALSO, PLUS, AGAIN,
INFORMATION FURTHERMORE, ADDITIONALLY, AND
THEN, IN ETC.
TO INDICATE LIKEWISE, SIMILARLY, AS WELL
SIMILARITY AS,ETC.
TO ADD SUPRISING ON TOP OF THAT, TO TOP IT ALL OFF
INFORMATION

 EXEMPLIFICATION OR REINFOREMENT
- CLARIFYING / ILLUSTRATING A PREVOIUS IDEA
TO STRESS THE TRUTH OF ASSERTION IN FACT, AS A
OR FACTS MATTER A FACT
TO VERIFY DIFFERENT IDEA REALLY, TRULY,
BUMIBIGAT ANG WEIGHT NG WORDS INDEED,CLEARLY ETC.
TO EXPOND FURTHER OF EXPRESS PARTICULARLY,
FURTHER OF EXPRESS FURTHER ORIN A SPECIFICALLY, THAT
DIFFERERENT WAY A NPREVIOSLY IS, ETC.
STARTED IDEA
ELABORATED
PINAPALAKI ANDG IDEA

 CONTRAST
- DISAGREE
- EXPRESSING OPPOSITION
TO REPLACE A PREVIOUS IDEA INSTEAD
TO DISSAGREE WITH PREVIOUS YET, STILL, BUT, HOWEVER,
IDEA ETC.
TO PRESENT A LOGICAL IDEA STILL, DESPITE,
NOTWITHSTANDING THE NONETHELESS, ETC.
PREVIOUS ONE
TO SUGGEST CONTRASTING OTHERWISE
RESULT IF A CERTAIN
 CONDITION IS NOT MET

 REDUCTION
- CHANGING THE PERSUASIVE OF A PREVIOUS IDEA
TO PRESENT IDEA THAT IS MORE ANYWAY, ANYHOW, ETC
IMPORTANT THAT THE PREVIOUS ONE

 SUMMARY
- INDICATING CONCLUSION
TO CAPSULIZE PREVIOUS TO END, IN SHORT, ALL IN ALL,
STATEMENT ETC
TO END A PRESENTATION IN THE END, TO CONCLUDE, ETC.

ODYSSEUS

 TRAITS
- RESILIENCE AND PEASISTENT
- LOYALTY
- DISCIPLINE AND SELF – CONTROL
- COMPASSION

PRONOUNS
- SUBSTITUTES NOUNS

 COMPOUND PRONOUNS
- MYSELF
- HIMSELF
- HERSELF
- ITSELF
- YOURSELF/ YOURSELVES
- OURSELF
- THEMSELVES

 REFLEXIVE PRONOUNS
- AIMS TO REFER TO THE SUBJECT AS THE RECIEVER OF THE
ACTION
- SUBJECT IS THE DIRECT OBJECT
 EXAMPLES
  FATHER GAVE HIMSELF A CHANCE TO SLEEP ALONE

 INTENSIVE PRONOUNS
- DOSEN’T REFER BECK TO SUBJECT OF THE SENTENCE BUT PUTS
EMPHASIS ON THE NOUN/ PRONOUN PRECEDES IT
- HAS AN EMPHATIC FUNCTION
 EXAMPLES
 MAYOR JOY BELMORE HERSELF SUSPENDED THE CLASSES LAST
FRIDAY

REFLEXIVE INTENSIVE
PRONOUN IS THE DIRECT OBJECT EMPHASIZE A SUBJEC
IF OMITTED IF OMITTED