Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER-8
Organizations exist for some purpose and objectives to achieve. These objectives can be
achieved by implementing various strategies from time to time. Strategies, formulated by
the top management, are implemented by the employees of the organization. Therefore,
responsibility of implementation of corporate strategies rests with various functional units
and departments of the organizations. An appropriate system to measure performance of
such functional units/departments/individuals is must for measuring and monitoring the
outcome of these strategies so that suitable corrective actions can be thought of, if
required. Performance measurement results can also be used as a tool to reward
outstanding performers.
Successful organizations know that to win in today’s competitive marketplace they must
attract, develop, and retain talented and productive employees. Winning organizations get
their competitive edge from a performance management system that helps them hire
talented people, place them in the right position, align their individual performance with
the organization’s vision and strategic objectives, develop their abilities and reward
performance commensurate with contributions to the organization’s success.
Improved Productivity -- Improvement in both the way people work and the outcomes
they produce.
Improved Employee Morale -- Resulting from on-time performance appraisals and
rewards commensurate with employee contributions.
Retention of Top Performers – Employees who get recognition and rewards for their
work become loyal employees.
Increased Profitability – Loyal employees deliver higher levels of service that result in
customer loyalty ultimately leading to increased revenue and profits.
will certainly help BSNL to move toward performance oriented work culture in the
organization. Considering the huge employee base and thus efforts involved in
formulating PMS for individual employee, BSNL top management has consciously
decided to introduce a Group Performance Management System (GPMS) .
Learning Objectives
After completion of this chapter, the trainees shall be able to:-
• Understand concept of Group Performance Management System
• Understand foundation of GPMS and BBSC
• Learn about groupings in GPMS of BSNL
• Understand sample GPMS of a territorial unit (SSA)
The GPMS is an initiative under Project SHIKHAR of BSNL with the intent to have an
objective and transparent system for assessing performance of employees.
It is a system for:-
• Identifying Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for individuals and various
functional groups within the organization
• Assigning KPIs to distinct groups aligned with organizational activities and goals
• Assigning targets and their relative weightage against such KPIs in objective &
transparent manner
• Carrying out assessment of performance of various groups
• Providing a basis for performance related HR policies
assessment also forms the part of every scorecard and this would be evaluated by the
person, whom the group reports to. For example, the evaluation for groups at the
Corporate Office would be done by the CMD, evaluation of the Territorial Circles will be
done by the Management Committee (MC), evaluation of SSAs will be done by the
respective Circle Heads and evaluation of non-territorial circles would be done by the
respective corporate office Directors and Executive Directors. The KPI titled as overall
performance assessment, would evaluate the groups on parameters which are qualitative
in nature.
Introduction of GPMS in place of BBSC was considered because existing BBSC set up
adopted by BSNL, had following shortfalls:--
• Job Descriptions at an individual level were not clearly defined thus creation of
individual score card was not very objective and systematic.
• The long list of activities for each division, without clear cut delineation of
activities and responsibilities made it less conducive to effectively identify and
communicate Key Responsibility Area (KRA) of a specific post.
• Though Balanced Scorecards have been defined at various levels, the large
number of KPIs within each Scorecard as well as absence of critical enablers such
as an appropriate organization structure, well defined processes for tracking
performance and IT systems support hamper their effective implementation.
For implementation of GPMS in BSNL, all executives have been structured along 19
groups. The details of these group types are available as under:-
Groupings in GPMS of BSNL
Category of Group Type Number of Number of groups
groups group types
1. Consumer Fixed 1 1
Access
2. Consumer 1 1
Mobility
3. Enterprise 1 1
Corporate Office
4. New businesses 1 1
5. Corporate Affairs 1 1
6. HR (Incl. Legal 1 1
and Vigilance)
7. Finance 1 1
Territorial Circle Territorial Circle 1 26
1. Project Circle 1 5
2. Maintenance 1 4
Region
3. Inspections 1 1
(earlier T&D)
Non Territorial 4. QA 1 1
Circle 5. Telecom Stores 1 1
6. Telecom Factory 1 3
7. ITPC 1 1
8. NCES 1 1
9. Data N/W 1 1
10. Training Circle 1 3
SSA SSAs 1 330
Total 19 384
In order to make GPMS effective, BSNL has also devised Individual Performance
Management System and Field Performance Management System.
objective and transparent system for assessing performance at the individual level. IPMS
will be on the lines of GPMS and all executives are to be covered.
With a view to motivate the field staff, a Field Performance Management System
(FPMS) has been worked out for units/individuals in the field involved in sales, quality
of service and customer service roles. For this scheme, the following units have been
identified:--
a) Employees involved in sales in Consumer Mobility (CM)
b) Employees involved in sales in Consumer Fixed Access (CFA)
c) Employees involved in sales in Enterprise
d) Employees involved in customer service in CSCs
e) Employees involved in operational roles at Exchanges (Indoor, outdoor and cable)
f) Employees involved in operational roles in Consumer Mobility
Just for example, awards for sales team for Project Udaan are as under:-
The final decision on awards at the Circle level should be made by the PGM/GM
(Consumer Mobility) after taking into the account the KPI scores of all SSA-level
Consumer Mobility Operations teams in the Circle. The final decision on awards at SSA
level should be made by the SSA Head after taking into account the KPI scores of all
Exchanges in the SSA. Awards are to be given quarterly in a ceremony at Circle and SSA
level. (For further details, the BSNL C. O. letter no. 3-5/2010-Restructuring Dated
15.04.2010 and subsequent letters may be seen on BSNL Intranet portal)
(The scheme of FPMS is valid upto 31.03.2011. To know about its further extension and
validity, the trainee may visit BSNL Intranet portal from time to time.)
5.0 Conclusion
The GPMS system is a very important and effective tool for measuring performance of
different groups against the targets set by the management on various operational fronts.
GPMS also provides an opportunity to assess the performance from time to time and
initiate timely corrective measures in cases of deviations.
Exhibit-A
Target Achieved
Marks Achieved
Weighted Score
Levels
Weightage %
Group level
KPI
Dimension
weightage
Group
Good
Excel
Target
Fai
Fin CFA revenue (Rs. Cr.) 40
Note: Marks for Fair rating = 60, Good = 80, Excellent = 100. Marks achieved for rating below Fair = 0.
For 19th distinct group i.e. SSAs, the GPMS scorecards are prepared by Nodal designates
in respective Territorial Circle Office.
Question: Are there any other important things that are to be kept in mind while
preparing the GPMS Scorecard or finalizing the performance parameters of GPMS.
Answer: While finalizing the GPMS scorecards it should be kept in mind that the
performance parameters chosen are :-
• Linked with strategic objectives and vision of organization
• Measurable and are not subjective
• Actionable, result-oriented and controllable
• The number of KPIs should be kept at a minimum.
• Oriented towards driving desired behavior / performance
• Capable of being benchmarked
• Unambiguous and easy to understand
• Have the largest impact on achieving strategic objectives/ Company’s Scorecard
• It should be possible to set targets against them
While finalizing the performance indicators it should also be kept in mind how the
achievements will be reported. During the course one should ensure that such processes
and methods are put in place that helps in true and timely reporting of achievements.
Information Technology use in the company should aim in getting the accurate reports on
achievement of key performance parameters.
Question: Can we change the targets once fixed after the quarterly review.
Answer: The course correction is an integral part of GPMS implementation. On review,
Question : What is meant by fair, good and excellent marking against the target.
Answer: Targets would be set against each parameter of the scorecard. Achieving the
target would result in a score of ‘100’ for that parameter. If the achievement is less than
100, the score would be based on the performance level for which a score of 60 and 80
can be obtained. For example, if the revenue target is 100 Cr. and performance levels are
set as follows
The achievement level of excellent, good and fair will result in score of 100, 80 and 60
respectively. Therefore, achievement of 100 Cr, 75 Cr and 50 Cr revenue in above cited
example would result in a score of 100, 80 and 60 respectively.
The total score against a KPI would be calculated after multiplying the weightage of a
parameter with its performance score and final score will be sum total of scores for all
parameters. For understanding, let us assume that in the above example, if revenue target
was given weightage of 40% and the achievement was Rs. 100 Cr. Then score achieved
against this KPI shall be 40% of 100 i.e. 40. If revenue achievement was Rs. 75 Cr. then
score achieved shall be 40% of 80 i.e. 32. Any revenue achieved between 50 and 75 Cr.
would result in a score between 60 and 80 after linear scaling. Similarly, any revenue
achieved between 75 and 100 Cr. would result in a score between 80 and 100 after linear
scaling. Revenue less than 50 Cr. would result in a 0 score for that performance KPI. The
formula for linear scaling as under:-
The balanced scorecard is a management system (not only a measurement system) that
enables organizations to clarify their vision and strategy and translate them into action. It
provides feedback around both the internal business processes and external outcomes in
order to continuously improve strategic performance and results. The traditional system
of financial measurements tell the story of past events, an adequate story for industrial
age companies for which investments in long-term capabilities and customer
relationships were not critical for success. These financial measurements are inadequate,
however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age companies must
make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees,
processes, technology, and innovation.
The balanced scorecard suggests that we view the organization from four perspectives,
and to develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives:
• The Learning and Growth Perspective
• The Business Process Perspective
• The Customer Perspective
• The Financial Perspective
Greater Financial
Return
Financial
More
purchase/Use
Increased
Customer
Satisfaction Customer
Greater
Reliability
Improved Internal
Quality process
Better Process
Control
Innovation &
Training- Training
KSA