You are on page 1of 9

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Center, Camp General Emilio Aguinaldo, Quezon City, Philippines

CHECKLIST
Barangay
Local Disaster Risk Reduction & Management Councils (LDRRMCs)
Gawad KALASAG CY 2017

I.PREVENTION AND INDICATORS Weighted Earned Remarks


MITIGATION (35 Points) Points Point/s
1. Risk Assessment (8)
1.1 Availability of maps  Number of relevant, 4
(hazard, updated and
vulnerability, digitized maps
capacity and present and
resource) prominently
displayed
 Correct scale of
maps for barangays-
1:5,000,
spot/community map
1.2 Presence of a  Complete, updated 2
database on and disaggregated
elements at risk
1.3 Conduct of Risk  Result of risk 2
Assessment and assessment and
Analysis analysis

2. Plans, Policies and (8)


Budget
2.1 Disaster prevention  Number of disaster 3
and mitigation prevention and
measures integrated/ mitigation programs
mainstreamed in the and projects
Barangay incorporated in the
Development Plan BDP and LDIP/AIP
and Local
Development and
Annual Investment
Program
2.2 Funding for  Number of PPAs in 3
prevention and the approved budget
mitigation PPAs and statement of
receipts and
expenditure (SRE)
2.3Non-state actors in  Number of non-state 2
the planning and actors involved

Telefax: NDRRMC Opcen +63 (2) 911-1406; 912-2665; 912-5668; NDRRMC Secretariat +63 (2) 912-0441; 912-0459;
Office of the Administrator, Office of Civil Defense +63 (2) 912-2424
Email: dopcen@ndrrmc.gov.ph Website: www.ndrrmc.gov.ph
implementation of (CSO’s, Women,
prevention and Youth, and
mitigation others such as
projects/activities of religious,
the DRRMC. business and
other basic
sectors i.e.
Victims of
Disasters and
Calamities,
PWDs. Elderly,
children, etc)
3. Early Warning System (4)
3.1 Established EWS  Presence of EWS 4
for specific hazards in protocol per hazard
the locality
 Presence of Four
Elements of a sound
EWS:
a. Risk Knowledge
b. Alert and
Monitoring
c. Dissemination
d. Response
Capacity
4. Risk Financing (5)
4.1 LGU facilities and  Presence of 2
equipment are covered Insurance Policies
by insurance
4.2 LGU facilitated  MOA/MOU of LGU 1
agreement with with the banks,
cooperatives, micro cooperatives, micro
finance institutions, finance institutions
and local financing
institutions to extend
calamity loans to the
affected community
(RA10121 sec 17)
4.3 Accredited  Insurance coverage 2
Community Disaster of ACDVs
Volunteers (ACDVs)
5. Environmental (4)
Management
5.1 Environmental  Presence of
laws/ordinance/s environmental code 2
enacted and ordinances
5.2 Programs and  Number of 2
projects on Programs, Projects,
environmental and Activities

Page 2 of 9
management implemented
6. Infrastructure (6)
Resilience
6.1  Infrastructure Audit 2
Inspection/Assessment Report
of all local government  Report/Action
facilities and photos of Inspection
Infrastructure as well
as Infrastructure being
utilized by the public
6.2Ensuring all  Number of 2
constructions comply construction of
to accepted standards barangay
and specifications buildings/facilities
are:
o Compliant to
the National
Building Code
of the
Philippines
(PD 1096)
o Compliant to
Accessibility
Law (BP 344)
for public
infrastructure
and those
being used by
the public
6.3 Conduct of  Regular risk 2
periodic maintenance assessment
work on public facilities  Maintenance work
and infrastructure undertaken
 Budget allocated
and utilized for
maintenance

II. PREPAREDNESS (30 Points) INDICATORS Weighted Earned Remarks


Points Point/s
1. Barangay Development (6)
Council
1.1 Functionality of 3
BDC
1.1.1 Organization of  Executive 1
BDC Order/Ordinance/Re
solution organizing
the BDC/BDRRMC

Page 3 of 9
1.1.2 Composition of  Me 2
the BDC compliant mbership of
to RA 7160 accredited CSOs to
particularly on the the
membership of non- Council/Committee
state stakeholders.  Fun
ctional and
organizational
Charts on display
1.2 Regularity of  Minimum: Semestral 1
meetings
1.3 Quorum during  Quorum in meetings 1
meetings
1.4 Regularity of  Minimum: Quarterly 1
Standing
Committee/Task Unit
meetings
2. Barangay DRRM (11)
Committee
2.1 DRRM Office/Desk  Separate and 2
established dedicated
office/desk
2.2 Organizational  Organizational and 1
Structure functional chart on
display
2.3 Capacity  Number of CapDev 1
Development for activities and
Personnel personnel trained

2.4 Equipagefor:  Adequacy of 2


a. Office Operations equipment
b. Training
c. Search and
Rescue and
Medical
d. Transportation
2.5 Operation center  Detail Order of 1
manned on a personnel
24-hr basis
2.6 Necessary skills  Number of reports 1
and competencies prepared
of personnel on:
a. Basic Reporting
b. RDANA
c. PDANA
2.7 Efficient and  Adequate 1
effective IEC laymanized (local
materials on dialect) IEC
Hazards, risks, materials available

Page 4 of 9
vulnerabilities, and posted in
EWS, and counter- conspicuous places
measures.
2.8 Pre-positioned  Presence of 1
stockpiles of relief stockpile items or
goods (food and negotiated credit line
non-food) or a as evidenced by a
negotiated MOU/MOA
agreement with
local suppliers
2.9 Submission of the  Reports received by 1
Barangay DRRM the BDC
Fund Utilization
Report to the BDC
3. Plans (3)
3.1 Barangay DRRM  Availabl 1
Plan e, Approved and
updated plan

3.2 Contingency Plan  Available, Approved 1


and updated plan

3.3 Communication  Available, Approved 1


Plan of the BDRRMP and updated plan
and the Contingency
Plan
4. Capacity development (7)
for the community and
stakeholders
4.1 Disaster Risk  General and basic 1
Reduction and DRRM Orientation
Management (DRRM) conducted
 Orientation for
PDRA conducted
4.2. Evacuation Camp  At least .5
Management (1) training
conducted during
the review year
4.3 Community-based  At least .5
Disaster Risk (1) training
Reduction Mana- conducted during
gement the review year
4.4 Search and  At least (1) training 1
Rescue conducted during
a. Water the review year
b. Collapsed
Structure
c. Mountain
d. Swift Water

Page 5 of 9
4.5 Fire Suppression  At least (1) training .5
conducted during
the review year
4.6 Medical Services  At least (1) training .5
(Basic Life Support, conducted during
First Aid) the review year
4.7 Incident Command  At least (1) training .5
System (ICS) conducted during
the review year
4.8 Family and  At least (1) training 1
Community-Based conducted during
Disaster the review year
Preparedness &
Monitoring System
4.9 Psycho-social  At least (1) training .5
Intervention conducted during
the review year
4.10 Involvement of  Participation as 1
NGOs/CSOs/Busin resource person or
ess & Private in the participant
conduct of training
(enabler and
receiver)
5. Partnership (3)
Mechanisms/Linkages
5.1 Participation of  MOA/MOU of the 1
NGOs, Business and partnership relating
Private Sectors, and to preparedness
others (excluding the
conduct of training)
5.2 Resource  Acknowledgement 1
Mobilization Receipts
(Monetary and Non-  Photo
Monetary) documentation of
the Actual
Operations
5.3 Inter-LGU  Established inter- 1
Cooperation and LGU alliance
Alliances

III. RESPONSE (20 Points) INDICATORS Weighted Earned Remarks


Points Point/s
1. Demonstrated (20)
Capability
1.1 Without disaster
response operations
1.1.1 Standard  Available written 5

Page 6 of 9
Operating SOPs/ Protocols
Procedures (SOPs) in known to operatives
place for specific and responders
hazards in the area
1.1.2 Availability of  Checklist/Operations 1
Templates for LCE Listavailable and on
directives display
1.1.3 Readiness to  Structure available 3
deploy functional and on display (per
Incident hazard)
Management Team  Knowledgeable and
by the first responder skilled operatives
on site and responders
1.1.4. Availability of  Written SOPs 3
timely, accurate and  Number of
reliable response conducted drills,
SimEx, rehearsals
1.1.5 Identification of  List of sites and 2
relief distribution centers/maps
points/centers
1.1.6. Determination  List of sites and 2
of clinics, hospitals centers with
and RHUs to address description (bed
any medical capacity, hospital
emergency type) /maps
1.1.7. Identification of  List of sites and 1
Standard-based centers/maps
Evacuation Sites  Available and posted
and/or Centers and in conspicuous
Routes places
1.1.8 Readiness to  List of vehicles and 1
provide transportation drivers and/or MOA
for Evacuation with transport groups
if available
1.1.9. Establishment  Evacuation center 2
of Standard constructed
Evacuation Center(s) purposely for
evacuation
OR
1.2 With disaster (20)
response operations
1.2.1 Real time/near  Established 2
real time, end to end reporting system
reporting system  Presence of reports
such as:
o PDRA
o Sitrep
o RDANA
o DANA

Page 7 of 9
1.2.2 Conduct of Pre-  PDRA 2
Disaster Risk report/proceedings
Assessment
1.2.3 Activated  ICS team reports 3
functional Incident
Command System
(ICS) by the first
responder
1.2.4 Issuance of  Copies of issuances 3
public advisories in and public advisories
accordance with the
protocols developed
1.2.5 Executive  Copy of the EO and 4
Order/System on protocols
Forced Evacuation
1.2.6 Activation of  A copy of the 2
relief distribution adopted relief
points/centers using distribution
the relief distribution mechanism
mechanism  Reports
1.2.7 Coordination  Activation of EOC 2
with appropriate and Cluster System
agencies
1.2.8 Conduct of  Copy of RDANA 2
Rapid Damage  Reports
Assessment and
Needs Analysis
(RDANA) within 72
hours after the
occurrence of the
disaster

IV. RECOVERY AND INDICATORS Weighted Earned Remarks


REHABILITATION (15 Points) Points Point/s

1. Without Disaster (in the (15)


preceding year)
1.1 Efforts that will  List of PPAs to 5
mitigate the impact of increase resiliency
future disaster
(activity and policy
consistent with risk
assessment, etc.)
1.2. Compliance  List of Build Back 5
with Build-back Better Better compliant
Principle PPAs with
specifications
1.3 Multi-stakeholder  Participation of multi- 5
approach stakeholder in

Page 8 of 9
planning,
implementation and
monitoring of
mitigating projects
OR
2. With Disaster (15)
2.1 Conduct of  DANA report 5
Damage and Needs
Assessment (DANA)
2.2 Recovery Plan  Formulated based 5
on the DANA Report
 Compliance with the
build back better
principle
 PPAs identified for
all sectors affected
with corresponding
budget and budget
source
 Involvement of multi-
stakeholder in
planning,
implementation and
monitoring of the
recovery plan
2.3 Restoration  Compliance with 5
Build-back Better
Principle
 Status of projects in
the recovery plan

TOTAL POINT SCORE: __________

Rating Scheme:
Excellent 91 – 100% Non-operational 51 – 60%
Very Good 81 – 90% Defective 41 – 50%
Good 71 – 80% Non-existent 0 – 40%
Weak 61 – 70%

Comments, if any:

Certified by:

___________________________
Signature over Printed Name/ Date

Page 9 of 9

You might also like