TL-3104 PENGELOLAAN PERSAMPAHAN

TUGAS A
Kajian Potensi Daur Ulang: Mengidentifikasi Pola Masyarakat dan Sektor Informal
dalam Kegiatan Reduksi dan Daur Ulang Sampah

Dosen: Mohammad Chaerul, ST, MT

Oleh:
Ketua Kelompok : Farras Rayhan 15314057
Sub Kelompok A : Radiyah Ramadhani 15314079
Jessica Amanda Putri 15314053
Dian Putri Retnosari 15314093
Sub Kelompok B : Noeril Fathih 15314086
Sania Septiani 15314058
Kyrana Adhityaningrum S 15314073
Sub Kelompok C : Farras Rayhan 15314057
Vania Theresia W 15314062
Luvy Dellarosa 15314069
Sub Kelompok D : Muhammad Ivan 15314063
Muslihaturrodliyah 15314088
Dini Widyani Aghnia 15314098

PROGRAM STUDI TEKNIK LINGKUNGAN

FAKULTAS TEKNIK SIPIL DAN LINGKUNGAN
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG

2016
 SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Along with the growth of development and the increasing of population growth, there is an
increase of human activity which implies the increasing amount of waste, especially in big cities,
including Bandung Increasing population growth in Indonesia, causing increased domestic
consumption of goods and also lead waste generation. Every time garbage pile increased, if it’s not
managed properly can cause problems especially for healthcare. Piling waste generation is left
without being managed can disrupt the aesthetic and also can cause disease vectors

. According to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Constitution Number 18 Year 2008 Article 1,
paragraph 5, garbage is the rest of human daily activities and / or natural processes which form the
trash. Waste sources is the origin of waste. Whereas explained that waste management is a systematic,
comprehensive, and continuous that includes waste reduction and handling. Waste reduction, as
referred to include the following activities:

1. Reduce, which is to reduce the use of which will produce waste by way of limitation in a
certain amount.
2. Reuse, namely reusing waste that can still be exploited.
3. Recycling, that do recycle the wastes that have been generated.

With the enforcement of the concept of 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycling) in such laws, waste
management in Indonesia must encounter treatment since the source of the waste up to the landfill
(End Processing).

Waste handling activities consist of:

• Sorting the garbage grouping by type or nature,

• Collecting which taking and removing waste from the source to temporary shelters or to the
integrated waste treatment facility,

• Transporting that pick up trash from the source or from temporary shelters or from the integrated
waste treatment leading to final processing

• Processing that is within the context of changing the shape, composition, characteristics, and the
amount of waste, and

• final processing of the waste in the form of returning waste or residues of previous processing into
the environment safely.

At the source, it is necessary to lug garbage. Lug garbage is a way of waste collection before
it is collected, transferred, transported and discharged into a garbage dump to prevent garbage
scattering and facilitate the process of waste collection. The form and material of the lug which can be
used to determine the effectiveness of the collection and removal garbage, especially the time needed
for landfills.
 In collection process several known patterns in the collection of which the pattern of
individual and communal patterns. In the collection of individual pattern made from door to door then
transported to temporary shelters, while the pattern of communal waste is collected at the point of
collection and then taken by officers to be transported to temporary shelters.

From the description above comes the attention to the importance of concept of garbage
minimizing at source, so it needs to do a study on the potential for waste recycling by identifying
patterns of society and the informal sector activity regards the reduction and recycling of waste

1.2. Formulation of the problem

Based on this background, the authors formulate the issues to be addressed, that:

1. What is the pattern of society in the activities of management and the potential reduction and waste
recycling in each residence?

2. How is the role of the informal sector in waste recycling?

3. What are the prospects use of waste in the waste management system?

1.3 Research purposes

The purpose of writing this report include:

1. Identify patterns of community management activities and potential for reduction and waste
recycling in each residence.

2. Identify the role of the informal sector in the recycling bin.

3. Knowing the prospects of use of waste in the waste management system.

1.4 Scope

1. Based on the background of the above problems, the authors wrote scope of the problem as
follows:

2. Waste as defined in this study correspond to the definition of garbage according to

Constitution number 18/2008 on Waste Management, is the rest of their daily activities and /
or natural processes in the solid form.

3. Waste management is meant in this study correspond to the definition of waste management,
according to Constitution number 18/2008, is a systematic, comprehensive, and continuous
covering waste reduction and handling.

4. Waste reduction activities include restrictions on waste generation, reuse of garbage and
waste recycling.

5. Waste management activities include segregation, collection, transportation, processing and

final processing of garbage.

6. Lugging garbage reviewed in this study in accordance with the dictates Waste Management
(Damanhuri, 2010) is a way of temporary waste collection at the source, both individual and
 communal. The authors review the lug garbage trash containers in particular is level 1 and
level 2.

7. Garbage collection is referred to in this study in accordance with the dictates Waste
Management (Damanhuri, 2010) is a waste management is the process by collecting from
each source of waste to be transported to (1) a temporary shelter or to (2) waste management
in regional scale or (3) directly to the final processing site without going through transporting
process.

1.5. Systematical Writing

The report is organized in a systematic task and consists of five chapters, which contains:

1. Chapter I: Introduction

Introduction contains research background, purpose and research objectives, scope, and systematic
writing.

2. Chapter II: Methodology

The methodology provides the techniques of data collection and data analysis

3. Chapter III: Results and Discussion

Results and discussion consists of data from interviews as well as analysis and discussion. Analysis
and discussion lists of potential solid waste recycling at the source, lug pattern and the collection of a
region and its evaluation, quantity and composition of the waste that is in the source and run the
informal sector and the role of the informal recycling sector.

4. Chapter IV: Conclusion

Conclusions and suggestions consist of conclusions and suggestions which contains

suggestions for governments, advice to the public, and advice to students.
 SECTION II

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1. Stage of Researce

A study usually starts with a careful planning which followed the manual sequences are
arranged logically and systematically so that the results can represent the actual conditions and
accountable. Generally in conducting the study, the authors conducted a series of stages of literature
study, observation, interviews, sampling, direct measurement, data processing, review the tasks that
have been made previously, the identification and evaluation.

Methodology of the study is closely related to procedures, tools, as well design of the study
used in conducting research. Stage of the process in this research flows according to logical path. The
goal is to give apparent, orderly and systematic hints. The composition of these stages greatly
influence the quality of the obtained results later. Broadly speaking, these stages can be described as
in the following picture:

2.2. Methods of Collecting Data

In the implementation of this research as well to support the examined issues, we needed to take some
data are expected. Therefore, in gaining the data needed, data collection methods used as follows:

1. Literature Study

Literature Study is made to obtain the basic knowledge of solid waste management, especially about
the management system, pile of testing procedures, composition, and others. This method is done by
studying books, results of previous studies, magazines, reports and others, which are closely related to
the problem being studied.

2. Observation

Observations carried out by visiting research directly to that nearby the residence of the author and
some places where there Junkman, scavengers and collectors. Observations conducted to obtain data
field conditions objectively.

3. Interview

Interviews were conducted to obtain data from respondents directly about garbage pile, solid waste
reduction efforts, and solid waste management, as well other data which can not be obtained when an
observation by interviewing informants.

4. Sampling and Direct Measurement

Sampling of garbage pile is done once in four houses (including writer’s home) to find out how many
of garbage pile generated by one house per day based on income levels. Sampling of garbage pile is
done by calculating the weight, volume, and density of the garbage generated by each house.
 SECTION III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Societies
3.1.1 Waste Composition
3.1.1.1 Upper Economic Class Society Waste Composition
Upper Economic Class Society Waste Composition
12.00%
4.00%
55.00% 9%
17%
3%
Papers Cardboards Plastic Bottles
Plastic Packagings Metals Organic waste

Upper Economic Class Society Waste Composition

43%
57%

Organic Inorganic

The chart above represents the upper economic class society waste composition.
Comparing to other type of the society, the upper economic class produce more inorganic
waste such as papers, plastic packagings, plastic bottles, etc. This much amount of waste
paper production is influenced by upper economic class society’s routine that relates to
offices and education activities. Plastic bottles is produced because this society do not care
about the high cost of purchasing bottled water. Other societies prefer to bring tumbler and
buying water in gallons. This society produce more plastic packaging because they tend to
shop at supermarkets that provide goods with more amount of packagings than at the
conventional markets. However, this pretty big amount of inorganic waste can be minimized
if they have more awareness regardless of how sufficient their knowledge about the
environment and waste management.

3.1.1.2 Middle Economic Class Society Waste Composition

 Middle Economic Class Society Waste
Composition
8.00% 5.00%
6%
66.00% 12%
3%

Papers Cardboards Plastic Bottles

Plastic Packagings Metals Organic waste

Middle Economic Class Society Waste

Composition

32.86%

67.15%

Organic Inorganic

The chart above represents the middle economic class society waste composition. The
amount of inorganic waste generated by this society, which is 67.15%, stands in-between the
amount of inorganic waste generated by the upper economic class and the lower economic
class society.

3.1.1.3 Lower Economic Class Society Waste Composition

Lower Economic Class Society Waste Composition

6.00% 3.00%
5%
7%
3%
76.00%

Papers Cardboards Plastic Bottles

Plastic Packagings Metals Organic waste

Lower Economic Class Society Waste Composition

24.97%

75.03%

Organic Inorganic

The chart above represents the lower economic class society waste composition.
Comparing to other type of the society, the upper economic class produce less inorganic
waste. This society often does not have adequate economic ability to do afford education, so
many of them are not working an office job that can produce more paper waste. The lower
economic class society prefers to cook their tap water, that does not meet the drinking water
standard, because they also cannot afford bottled or galloned water. This society cook their
 own meal because it is cheaper than buying ready-made meals so they produce more organic
waste than other economic type of societies. They buy groceries from conventional markets
that does not provides goods with that many plastic packagings.

3.1.2 Waste Sorting Activities

3.1.2.1 Waste Sorting Activites in Upper Economic Class Society

Waste Sorting Activites in Upper Economic

Class Society

33.333300%

66.67%

Yes No

The chart above shows the waste sorting activities in upper economic class society
based on the twelve households samples. The households that is doing the waste sorting
activities is up to 33.333% which concludes that the households don’t have that much of a
concern about waste sorting even though they have the knowledge about waste management
and the harm that caused by waste. This was caused by the society with high economic
indifferent to the profit from waste sorting because Indonesian people usually get money
when they sell their waste. The upper economic class society doesn’t need that.

3.1.2.2 Waste Sorting Activites in Middle Economic Class Society

Waste Sorting Activites in Middle Economic Class
Community

50.00% 50.00%

Yes No

The chart above describes the waste sorting activities in middle economic class
society based on the twelve households samples. The households that is doing the waste
sorting activities is up to 50%. It can be caused by two matters, wheter the society has the
knowledge and awareness about waste management or they expect economic benefits from
waste sorting activities. Many people in Indonesia do the waste sorting because they want to
sell their waste afterward.

3.1.2.3 Waste Sorting Activites in Lower Economic Class Society

 Waste Sorting Activites in Lower Economic Class
Society

41.67%
58.33%

Yes No

(Chart 4.3 Waste Sorting Activites in Lower Economic Class Society)

The chart above represents how many households in lower economic class that is
doing the waste sorting activities. 58.33% of the twelve household samples has already done
the waste sorting activities although they don’t have enough knowledge and awareness about
environment and waste management. This society is doing the waste sorting activities because
they are expecting to get economic profit from selling waste such as plastic, metals, woods,
etc.

3.1.3 Reuse Activities

3.1.3.1 Reuse Activities in Upper Economic Class Society
Reuse Activities in Upper Economic Class
Society

41.666700
% 58.33%

Yes No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve upper economic class households with
the parameter of reuse activities in each household. Compared to other societies, the upper
economic class society is the least one doing reuse activities because they can afford new
things. If they want to contribute in saving the environment because they have sufficient
knowledge and awareness to do so, they can do it in any other way. There are only 41.6667%
of the households that are doing the waste reuse activities. The type of waste that is reused by
this society is cardboards and plastic bags. They use cardboards to store their currently unused
goods and they also use it for packaging. Plastic bags are used to coat the trash can so they
can easily remove the waste and they do not have to clean their trash cans afterward. They
rarely reuse plastic bags to carry goods they can afford to buy a good quality goodie bag.

3.1.3.2 Reuse Activities in Middle Economic Class Society

 Reuse Activities in Middle Economic Class
Community

50.00% 50.00%

Yes No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve middle economic class households
about the waste reuse activities in each household. The chart shows that 50% of the sample
households is already doing the waste reusing activities. This data is in-between the upper and
lower economic class society. The type of waste that is commonly being reused by this
society is plastic bags that can be used to carry goods in repeat as long as the plastic is still
good and harmless. They are also reusing cardboards for packaging and to store their
currently-unused-goods.
3.1.3.3 Reuse Activities in Lower Economic Class Society

Reuse Activities in Lower Economic Class

Society

41.67%
58.33%

Yes No

The chart above represents the waste reusing activities in middle economic class
society that is obtained from twelve households. This society do the most waste reusing
activities because they do not have the economic ability to buy new things. Plastic and
cardboards are also the type of waste they are reusing. Sometimes this society is reusing
plastic bottles and plastic bags until it exceeds the time limit because they are saving so much,
thus it can harm their health. Sometimes they are reusing damaged clothes for duster. They
also often buy secondhand stuffs and repaired the damaged ones by themselves because it is
cheaper that way.

3.1.4 Composting Activities

3.1.4.1 Composting Activities in Upper Economic Class Society
Composting Activities in Upper Economic Class
Society
8.333300%

91.67%
Yes No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve upper economic class households with
the parameter of reuse activities in each household. The chart shows 91.67% of the twelve
 house samples did not do composting because they are too busy of the high productivity
demanded, so they consider the time spent on composting. Besides, this society has a high
purchasing ability, thus they more likely to choose to buy compost that is sold in the market
rather than having to process organic waste that requires much time. Even so, there are
8.333% of the upper classes who do the composting. They do it because they have so much
knowledge and awareness about the environment.

3.1.4.2 Composting Activities in Middle Economic Class Society

Composting Activities in Middle Economic Class

Community
16.67%

83.33%
Yes No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve middle economic class households
about the composting activities in each household. There are 16.67% of the households who
do their own composting because they have sufficient grounds for composting. While 83.33%
prefer to buy fertilizer from the making because homemade fertilizer mostly not as good as
the good quality fertilizer because they also lack of knowledge to make good compost.

3.1.4.3 Composting Activities in Lower Economic Class Society

Composting Activities in Lower

Economic Class Society
25.00%

75.00%

Yes No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve lower economic class households with
the parameter of composting activities in each household. Compared to other societies, the
lower economic class society is the most society doing composting activities. Environmental
training often be held in the lower economic class environment, such as composting training.
This society has more togetherness than any other society so they more likely to contribute in
an event that involve people nearby their houses. Even though this type of society does not
understand the details about composting process, they have the skills to do it because they
trained. They also have motivation to do composting activities in the form of economic profits
from selling the compost.

3.1.5 The Existence of Waste Banks Nearby

3.1.5.1 The Existence of Waste Banks in Upper Economic Class Society
 Is there any "Waste Banks" nearby?
0%

100%
Yes, there is No

The data chart above is obtained from twelve upper economic class households with
the parameter of the existence of waste banks nearby their households. From the chart, we
concludes that there is no waste banks in the environment of upper class society. Before we
give up our waste to the waste banks, it is required to sort and clean our waste. Upper class
society do not have time to do those kind of activities. This society does not need the money
earned from depositing waste to the waste banks.

3.1.5.2 The Existence of Waste Banks in Middle Economic Class Society

Is there any "Waste Banks" nearby?

8.33%

91.67%
Yes, there is No

The chart above represents how much waste banks operating in middle economic
class environment from twelve sample households. From the chart, we get the number of
8.33% of the 12 sample households has waste bank nearby their houses. In this society, there
is often a group of mothers in a community called “Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga”. In
that community mothers often do activities that can make them learn to manage everything
that relates to family welfare, such as operating a waste bank.

3.1.5.3 The Existence of Waste Banks in Lower Economic Class Society

Is there any "Waste Banks" nearby?

16.67%

83.33%

Yes, there is No

The chart above represents how much waste banks operating in lower economic class
environment from twelve sample households. From the chart, we get the number of 16.67%
of the 12 sample households, thus this type of society is the most society to have waste bank
nearby their houses. The existence of waste bank region low economic environment makes
their group become financially independent as it gets additional income from saving trash.
3.1.6 Waste Treatment
3.1.6.1 Waste Treatment by Upper Economic Class Society
Waste Treatment by Upper Economic Class Society

2.92% 5.58%
1.83%
7.50%

82.17%

Carried by Waste Collector

Burned
Threw to the Body of Water

The chart above represents waste treatment by upper economic class society after it is
produced. Upper economic class society is the most society to have their waste get carried by
the waste collector and the scavenger (82.17%) and the least society to have their waste being
reused, recycled, and sold. It is because they do not bother and do not have time to give
further treatment to the waste. They also do not need money from selling waste so they are
more likely to just give the inorganic waste which still can be reused or recycled to the
scavenger. The upper economic class society supposed to be the society that has more
awareness and knowledge about environment and waste management. It is in line with this
observation results that shows this society is the least society to give a wrong treatment to
their waste, such as burning and throwing their waste to the body of water (7.5% and 1.83%)

3.1.6.2 Waste Treatment by Middle Economic Class Society

Waste Treatment by Middle Economic Class Community

7.67%
12.75%
3.00%
8.33%
68.25%

Carried by Waste Collector Burned

Threw to the Body of Water Reused & Recycled
Selled

The chart above represents waste treatment by middle economic class society after it
is produced. The data obtained is moderate being compared to the data from upper and lower
economic class society.

3.1.6.3 Waste Treatment by Lower Economic Class Society

 Waste Treatment by Lower Economic Class Society
12.08%
8.58%

15.08% 50.42%

13.83%

Carried by Waste Collector Burned

Threw to the Body of Water Reused & Recycled
Selled

The chart above represents waste treatment by lower economic class society after it is
produced. Lower economic class society is the least society to have their waste get carried by
the waste collector and the scavenger (50.42%) and the most society to have their waste being
reused, recycled, and sold (8.58% and 12.08%). It is because they need money from selling
waste. The lower economic class society often cannot afford an education so they are more
likely to be the society that lack of awareness and knowledge about environment and waste
management. It is in line with this observation results that shows this society is the most
society to give a wrong treatment to their waste, such as burning and throwing their waste to
the body of water (713.83% and 15.08%)

3.1.7 Waste Production

Total Waste Proudction

30000
20000
10000 Volume Total Waste
0 Proudction
Lower Middle Upper
Economic Class Economic Class Economic Class

Figure . Total Waste Production

From the results of waste generated family graph versus the amount of waste generated can be
seen that the middle income level, the volume of waste generated most among the trash generated by
the high and low incomes. This relates to the psychological, educational and social culture. Middle-
income communities produce waste with an average volume is 26666.67 cm3, because when
observation, samples were obtained from middle income people

3.1.8 Consumption of waste plastic bags

Consumption of waste plastic bags

35% 1

65% 2
 Figure. Consumption of Waste Plastic Bags for Shopping

Besides a lack of waste reduction, many people are still using plastic bags. This is shown in
the survey results, which showed that 65% of respondents, people still ask for plastic bags at
shopping. Of course it will add the trash generated, while as many as 35% of respondents who always
bring their own bags to present already their environmentally-conscious society, this is related to the
background of public education for reducing the solid waste generation. Potential recycling and
reduction solid waste generation household level can be created if people had been aware of their
environment

3.1.9 Flowchart of Waste in Residential Areas

Figure. Flowchart of Waste in Residential Areas

3.2. Interview Results Of Informal Sectors

3.2.1 Garbage Collectors
This research was conducted interviews with garbage collectors, garbage collector is someone
who collect garbage from the houses of citizens and bring it to the dump. Here is the interview results
with the garbage collectors based on the composition of waste collected

From the results of our interviews of 12 respondents, all respondents said that they collect all
kinds of garbage both organic and inorganic consisting of kitchen waste (food scraps), plastic bottles,
cardboard, cans of used beverage, plastics, paper, and others (packaging , glass bottles, and foliage).
For more details can be seen in the diagram below.
 Lain- Percentage of Waste
Lain Sisa
8% Makanan
20%
Kertas
18% Botol
Plastik Plastik
6% 20%
Kaleng
Minum Kardus
10% 18%
Figure. Compotition of garbage collected form Garbage Collectors

Type garbage collected are mostly kitchen waste (food scraps) and plastic bottles,
respectively 20%, because most of our respondents serve residential areas and garbage collection
areas. This was followed by paper waste by 18%, garbage cans of drinks by 10%, amounting to 6% of
plastic waste and other garbage (packaging, glass bottles, foliage) of 8%. However, this may not
necessarily represent the kind of waste of all waste collectors in Bandung. Because the survey was not
into the whole area that exist in Bandung so the discussion in this report only as much as the data
obtained.
3.2.1.1 Based on the frequency of garbage collection
Garbage collectors who we interviewed had the same frequency of waste collection,
which is done every day.

3.2.1.2 Based on the sorting garbage collector

From the interviews conducted, the amount of garbage collected by the garbage
collector with a sorting is explained below

Total Waste Sorted

with sorting
45%
55% without sorting

Figure. Total Waste Sorted of Garbage Collected by Garbage Collector

1. Based on income every month

From the interviews, most garbage collectors earn a month of Rp800,000 - Rp1.100.000,
that there is 50% of the interviewed personnel. Data can be seen in the following diagram.
Average Income of Waste Collector Personnel Every Month
6% 6%
<Rp 600.000

19% 25% Rp 600.000-Rp

800.000
44%
Rp 800.001-Rp
1.100.000
 Figure: Average Income of Waste Collector Personnel Every Month

Based on the diagram above, the income range of Rp800,000 a month - Rp 1,100,000
represents the most dominant compared to other income range, that there is 44% garbage
worker. This is related to the frequency of many types of waste are taken by garbage worker as
well as the additional income from a minimum wage / via neighborhood and. Gatherers whose
earnings are at the lowest range is under Rp. 600,000 just a fewer sorting of waste every day
and work a few time. Looks also have the highest income is> Rp1.200.000 is sorting garbage or
clean everyday

3.2.1.4 Based on average weight of daily garbage

Average weight gained by collecting garbage a day can be seen in the following diagram:
Percentage of Waste Weight Collected per day
5% 10% 0 kg - 9 kg
11%
10 kg - 18 kg
16% 32% 19 kg - 27 kg
26% 28 kg - 36 kg
37 kg - 45 kg

Figure.average weight of daily garbage diagram

This amount is influenced by the area that must be served by the collector. There are collectors
that service area is not too far,aroundt 5-8 kg per day. However, there is also a relatively large scope
service areas so that the amount of garbage collected even more than 46-54 kg. However, much waste
is collected a day is dominant in the range 10-18 kg / day, as respondents in the interview more on
duty in the area or the residential complex.

3.2.2 Scavenger
3.2.2.1 Based on the types of waste collected
In this study, conducted interviews to scavengers that people looking for livelihood and pick
up the trash that has a sale value and sell it. Here is the analysis of the results of interviews with
scavengers

Percentage of Waste Collected by Scavenger

16%
cardboard
24% plastic bottles
14%
3% 30% news paper
8% kaleng
5%

Figure Percentage of Waste Collected by Scavenger

Based on the picture above, it can be seen that most waste collected by scavengers are m
types of plastic bottles (30%), followed cardboard (24%). Plastic bottles and cardboard waste
that has a sale value higher than other types garbage. Besides the garbage is easily gained from
houses.
 In recap researchers collected data, it was found that the percentage of the collection of
plastic bottles have at most by scavengers, of 30% of the total waste collected. Further cardboard
type garbage by 24%, 16% plastic cups, paper 14%, 8% tin, newspapers 5%, and 3% metal.
According to the chart, that kind of waste is most widely collected garbage kinds of plastic
bottles.

3.2.2.2 Quantity/ Total Waste Collected by Scavengers per Day

Total Waste Collected by Scavengers per Day

6% 1% 7%
<1 sack
1-2 sacks
29% 3-4 sacks
57% 4-5 sacks
>6 sacks

Figure Total Waste Collected by Scavengers per Day

From the graph, it can be seen that the nominal waste collection per day divided into 5
groups, namely below 1 sack, 1-2 sacks, 3-4 sacks, 4-5 sacks and> 5 sacks, with the amount of trash
in one bag / the trash bag suppose to be 13 gallons or 49.21 L or 50 kg. The number of waste
collection is dominated by the amount of trash per day 50-100 kg at 57%. The amount of trash that
can be collected by scavengers also limited by the volume of waste collected pursuant with its type
The method used by the scavengers themselves divided into two, namely the collection of
garbage per individual or per group gathering. For collection per individual, scavengers will collect
and sort the garbage independently without the help of other scavengers.
For method of collection per group, scavengers will specify a polling station where they seek
as much as possible and start collecting garbage in the area. This method is considered effective when
the scavengers split duty to collect waste by types, thus improving work efficiency and shorten the
time required.
For the summary of data gathered by researchers, found that the amount that can be collected
in a single-day scavenger around 1-2 sack with a percentage of 57%. Next followed the amount of
waste that can be collected scavengers by 3-4 sacks with a percentage of 29%, 4-5 sack with the
percentage of 6%, more than five sack by 1% and the amount of waste that can be collected at least
scavengers of less than 1 sack with a percentage of 7%.

3.2.2.3 Based on Waste Selling Price

Range of Waste Selling Price by Scavengers

5000
4000
3000
2000
1000 Range of Waste Selling
0
Price by Scavengers
 Figure of Range of Waste Selling Price by Scavengers
From the graph above, we can see that the selling price for the type of metal bins have a
nominal maximum, followed by trash kind of cups and kind - other types of waste. Despite
having the highest nominal sale price, junk metals and plastic bottles tend to be difficult to find
with the high quantity, compared to other types of waste such as waste plastic bottles and
cardboard. Plastic bottles and cardboard trash has many uses and high flexibility for
reprocessing, therefore many scavengers who rely on subsistence through waste collection bottle
types of plastic and / or cardboard compared with other type of trash.
According to the survey, the most difficult types of trash found was trash metal, followed by
glass bins and garbage cans. Because of the metal bins have time for long and can be easily
recycled, many industries a little dispose of this material, unless was deemed can not be used
further. For the garbage cans, the quantity likely to be small because of the many foods that use
plastic packaging material than can (in addition to more portable and also more practical). For
waste paper, elusive indeed in good condition to be sold to the Junkman.
From interviews also found values of sales for each of the garbage is different depended the
kind, according to sources, the market price for each of the garbage in a row per kg is USD 2,750
for plastic bottles, Rp 2,500 for glass bottles, Rp 1,000 for the paper, Rp 5,000 for cans - canned,
Rp 4,250 for metal / iron.
3.2.2.4 Based on Daily Income

Figure.Average Income of Scavenger Per Day

10% 10%
Rp15.000-Rp 20.000
Rp21.000-Rp 30.000
15% 25% Rp31.000-Rp 50.000
40% Rp51.000-Rp 70.000

Figure.Average Income of Scavenger Per Day

From the data above, it can be seen that there are five types of income grouping of 24
scavengers of data per day. The average income of scavengers in the range Rp31.000 - Rp50.000 to
the type of waste collected garbage scavengers are plastic bottles, cardboard, paper and cans
Daily income of a scavenger is determined by the type of waste that will be sold to the Junkman /
local dump and also a lot of garbage collected per day depending on hours of operation.

3.2.3 Junkman
In this research, conducted interviews to the Junkman that person to sell or buy goods that are
not used but still value their role.

The following is an analysis of interviews with the Junkman

3.2.3.1 Based on the types of waste that purchased and resold

 The types of waste that purchased and resold by junkman
2% 6% 2%
2% news paper
6% 8% cardboard
2%
17% scrap metal(cans,wires)
11%
13% plastic
paper
10% 21%
plastic bottles

Figure. The types of waste that purchased and resold by junkman

Based on the picture above, it can be seen that the garbage is the most dominant type plastic
that is equal to (21%), followed cardboard (17%). Trash kinds of plastic bottles and cardboard waste
that has a sale value is higher than at other types of garbage. Besides these two bins are easy to obtain.
From interviews with 24 informants Junkman, found various types of waste that can be purchased
kembali.Dari diual or recap the interview data showed that the percentage of plastic has sold or
bought at most by the Junkman, amounting to 21% of various types of waste. The next second,
cardboard type garbage by 17%, scrap metal (cans, wires) 13%, glass / plastic bottles 11%, paper
10%, wood 2%,bucket 2%,plastic bags 6%,stove 2%, 8% newspapers, electrical and electronic
equipment as well as zinc 6% and 2%. According to the chart, that kind of garbage is collected at
most kinds of plastic trash.

3.2.3.2 Quantity/Total Waste Sold or Purchased by Junkman per day

Quantity/Total Waste Sold or Purchased by

Junkman per day
5% 4% <50 kg
9% 9%
50-70 kg
23% 18% 70-90 kg

32% 90-200kg
200-400kg

Figure .Quantity/Total Waste Sold or Purchased by Junkman per day

From the graph, can be found that the nominal waste collection per day divided into 7 groups,
which under 50kg, 50-70 kg, 70-90kg, 90-200kg, 200-400kg, 400-600kg and over 600kg. The amount
of waste is sold or purchased per day is dominated by the amount of 90-200 kg garbage is 32%. The
amount of trash that can be sold or bought also limited by by the volume of waste according to type.

3.2.3.3 Based on Waste Selling Price

 Average Price of waste that purchased and resold
4000
3000
2000 Price of waste that
1000 purchased
0
Price of waste that
resold

Figure Average Price of waste that purchased and resold

From the graph abovecan be seen that there are two a graph which a graph the purchase
price by the Junkman garbage and garbage selling price from Junkman. For this type of tin and
iron have a nominal maximum, followed by garbage types of plastic cups and other waste types.
Despite having the highest selling nominal, type garbage cans, metal and plastics tend to be
difficult to find with the high quantity, compared to other types of waste such as waste plastic
bottles and cardboard.
From interview, obtained the values of each waste, depend on its kind, according to source,
the profit gained around 50-70% from purchased
.
3.2.3.4 Based on Daily Income

Average Daily Income by Junkman

7% <Rp 50.000
22%
14% Rp 50.000-Rp 100.000
Rp 100.001- Rp 200.000
14%
Rp.200.001- Rp 300.000
43%
> Rp 300.000

Figure. Average Daily Income by Junkman

From the data above, can be found that there are five types of income grouping from the data
24 Junkman per day. The average income of scavengers be around 50,000 - 100,000 with the type of
waste collected by Junkman is garbage metal, plastic bottles, cardboard, paper and cans.
Junkman income depends on the quality of the wares and the amount of trash that is needed
according to its kind.

3.2.4 Flowchart of Waste in Informal Sectors

After the interview data recapitulated, then obtained a flow chart showing garbage trip is as
follows.
a. Scavengers
 Figure Flowchart of Waste by Scavengers
b. Garbage Collectors

Figure. Flowchart of Waste by Garbage Collectors

c. Junkman

Figure. Flowchart of Waste by Junkman

3.2.5 Role of the Informal Sector in Waste Management

a. Scavenger
From the data obtained has been defined, it can be said that as much as 59% scavenger (of the
total sample) have helped the process of recycling / waste recycling by transporting as much as about
49.21 to 98.42 liters of trash. Scavengers will sort out trash that still has a sale value, then be cleaned
and transported and sold to the city flea order to earn money.
From bandar”, usually trash will be sorted and then transported back all the company / specific
store that will reuse the used goods or make it as a base material (eg, plastic bins made of plastic ore).
So we can say that the scavenger participate and assist in the recycling of waste, especially in sorting,
cleaning, and transporting waste to bandar.
b. Junkman
Junkman is included in the informal sector plays an important role in waste management,
especially for organic-inorganic waste which has a value of recyclables such as plastic, paper
type, the former metal, and so on. This type of informal sector get the waste out of the previous
formal sector scavengers. This type of informal sector, Junkman, creating a wide range of services
for various parties. The first is the media services income for the scavengers and others who want
to sell the waste that has been collected to be recycled. The next service is Junkman provide
 services for the environment because it reduces the amount of waste disposed to landfill. This
service is done by Junkman doing the cleaning as well as grouping wastes given scavenger then
sold to factories that will process into the new material. Junkman revenue from this survey ranged
from 200 thousand to 17 million per month. It can be caused by the region, the environment and
community activities in operation, daily activities Junkman (if there are any additional work).
c. Garbage collector
Tchobanoglous (1977) mentioning that the average cost of collecting garbage in several cities
across North America ranging from 60-80% of the total cost of waste management. When
compared with the conditions reflected in the field, it is quite unfortunate, since garbage worker
has a considerable role in the management of garbage, but garbage collector welfare officer still
has not received the attention it deserves from the public.
Because of the uncertainty of the cost of garbage collection for each territory to be excluded,
it would require a more detailed study with the intention of searching for system and kind of
garbage collection is the most economical and efficient preparation to establish the most optimal
equipment. The cost of collection was large can be suppressed by determining the most optimal
method to set the garbage collection service and establish analysis techniques that can be used to
evaluate garbage collection.

3.2.6 Performance Evaluation of Solid Waste Management by Sectors

The amount of fees earned by scavengers are not comparable to the risks they are dealing in
their work environment scavengers classified as dangerous, because they are very vulnerable
exposed to the disease while taking the garbage / junk either in the trash or other places that are
usually dirty. Though they are very big role in waste management, as they can sort trash that can
still be processed / recyclable so that the potential of waste will be reduced and the economic
value of the trash can be further increased.
Based on the source (http://bandungkota.bps.go.id/), estimated the population of the city of
Bandung today is 2,483,977 inhabitants.
At this time the observation of samples of waste taken from the houses of citizens, then taken
a benchmark generated waste in a permanent home, which is about 2.25 to 2.50 liters / person /
day. Where waste generated 100% of citizens can be brought scavengers, the scavengers have
contributed cover waste generation resident of 200 / 2.5 people.
In the interview, we were asked Junkman aspirations for their future business plans. From the
results of our observation, there are two kinds of Junkman groups. The first group is the wanting
to be noticed and cooperation by the government. Their aspirations among others, is wanted by
the interests of capital for labor, land, and process units. The second group is truly regard their
business as a private company and does not want to be touched by the government. The group
generally already have plans in the future and be able to finance keberjalanan kepentigannya
respectively. Factors that may affect the types of Junkman second is a sense of comfort to work
alone and achieve maximum profit, as well as the complexity of the bureaucracy when it wants to
cooperate with probably the quantity of waste in processes and productivity economical, it
appears that Junkman who really want more competent the form of private business for the future.
But things are detrimental if Junkman form of private business that is difficult to monitor and
record the activities of these efforts.
Performance Evaluation of Waste Management by Sectors are follows:
a. Household Sector
From these data, it can be seen that more than half the housing sector does not do the
concept of 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) and dispose of waste generated only granted in
the absence of management.
 Data obtained from the survey results that 58% of scavengers take 1-2 sacks in a day
or 50-100 kg / day, most scavengers do not use a cart in the process of transporting waste.
In fact, as discussed above effectiveness of the process of collection by scavengers would
be more effective if it were more appropriate transport modes.
b. Informal Sectors:
-Junkman
From the survey results and the withdrawal of the aspirations from Junkman is obtained
as described above. There Junkman who just want to manage the waste they have
apportioned individuals and anyone wants to collaborate with the government but the
numbers a little. Usually Junkman who manage their garbage individually have an
income greater than if working with the government because they can manage all income
and expenditure trash independently without cutting the income from a particular party.
-Garbage workers
From the survey results, garbage workers have done waste sorting around 45%-55%. If
the percentage is risen up, then the solid waste management will be easier. The informal
sectors that recycled the waste will be increased, it means the garbage will be disposed to
SMT is the garbage that can’t be reused, and can be landfilled.
There is inequality between worker’s income. Garbage worker is very imortant, they
become a solution of waste generated by different sectors. However, their income still
unbalanced and far from risks and what they do. So, the government should pay more
attention to their welfare, such as analyzing the total income should gained by garbage
workers.
 SECTION IV
Conclusion and Recommendation

4.1 Conclusion

From the above discussion it could be concluded among other things:

1. Patterns of society in the reduction and recycling activities in each residence mostly taken up
by low-income people and middle-income, and most rarely or directly discharged is high
income people. Therefore, the higher the economic level, the lower the reduction of recycling
activities are done by the community
2. Some informal sector conduct by utilizing recycled goods that still have the functions and
value in use is quite high. However, there are also other informal sector activities are not
recycled at all. They only distribute garbage from SMT society and to collectors or all place
recycling trash provided as scavengers or Junkman participate more as a collector and
dividing items to be recycled. Executors of recycling carried out by a large city such as plastic
used as ore plastic, paper / cardboard recycling, while metal and such recycling.

4.2 Recommendation

4.2.1 Recommendation that suggested as an alternative in solid waste that will be practiced based
on data That obtained before,shown below:
1. Paying system for those who have a higher income to those who recycled the waste they
produced. Because they have no time to taking care of their garbage, it would rather making a
group of worker that take care of their garbage. The workers will be paid as a compensation
to not recycling and sorting their waste.
2. Encouraging waste banks more intensively on middle and low income people because most of
them have been willing to sort out the garbage from their houses. What is left are those that
will process the results of their sorting. If relying on scavengers then the system work will not
be good and less profitable for the owners, because usually the direct scavengers pick up trash
from the dumpster outside the existing house without paying. If the bank is managed well,
then the owner of the garbage will be paid from the trash bank because they sell their goods.
4.2.2 Proper Method for Analyze of Potential Waste Recycling
Our group categorized the good methods are:
1. Interview
2. Questionnaire, for the lists of question that will be asked to respondent.
3. Field Survey
To obtained those data, not only interview, but also observed the Junkman’s activity
(collecting, purchasing, and selling the waste) due to gained accurate result
APPENDIX A

KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN KARAKTERISTIK KONDISI RUMAH TANGGA DENGAN PENGOLAHAN
SAMPAH DOMESTIK DI LINGKUNGAN SEKITAR

Tanggal Wawancara :
No Kuesioner :

A. Identitas Responden

1. Nama :……………………………………………………….
2. Alamat :……………………………………………………….
3. Jenis Kelamin
a. Laki-laki
b. Perempuan
4. Umur
a. Usia Produktif (15- 64) tahun
b. Usia Tidak Produktif (< 15 tahun atau >64 tahun)
5. Pendidikan terakhir
a. Tidak sekolah, tidak tamat SD atau tamat SD
b. SLTP/sederajat atau SLTA/sederajat
c. Akademi atau perguruan tinggi
6. Pendidikan terakhir
a. PNS
b. TNI/ABRI/POLRI
c. Peg. Swasta/Karyawan
d. Pedagang
e. Buruh
f. Pensiun
g.Lainnya.............
7. Penghasilan
a. < Rp. 500.000,-
b. Rp. 500.000- Rp. 2.500.000,-
c. > Rp. 2.500.000,-
8. Jumlah Anggota RT =

B. Pengetahuan Masyarakat tentang Sampah

1. Apa pengertian sampah yang ibu/bapak ketahui ?

a. Sesuatu yang tidak dipakai dan tidak disenangi dan harus dibuang yang umumnya berasal dari
kegiatan manusia
b. Sesuatu yang berasal dari kegiatan manusia termasuk kotoran
c. Tidak tahu

2. Apa yang ibu/bapak ketahui mengenai pembagian sampah menurut mudah tidaknya membusuk ?
a. Sampah organik dan anorganik
b. Sampah basah dan sampah kering
c. Tidak tahu
3. Apakah seharusnya pembuangan sampah dipisahkan sesuai dengan jenisnya ?
a. Ya
b.Tidak
4. Apa yang ibu ketahui tentang sampah organik ?
a. Sampah yang berupa sisa-sisa dapur, seperti sayur-sayuran
b. Sampah plastik atau kaca
c. Tidak tahu

5. Apa yang anda ketahui tentang dampak negatif akibat sampah ?

a. Menyebabkan penyakit, mengganggu estetika, mencerminkan status sosial masyarakat yang rendah
b. Menyebabkan penyakit dan mengganggu estetika
c. Tidak tahu

6. Apa yang anda ketahui tentang dampak positif akibat sampah ?

a. Dapat menghasilkan uang jika diolah menjadi barang baru serta dapat digunakan lagi sehingga
mengurangi pengeluaran
b. Sampah tidak memberikan dampak positif
c. Tidak tahu

7. Apa yang anda ketahui tentang Reduce (mengurangi sampah) ?

a. Mengurangi jumlah sampah yang dihasilkan dari tiap rumah tangga
b. Mengurangi sampah yang dibuang ke TPA oleh rumah tangga
c. Tidak tahu

8. Apa yang ibu/bapak ketahui tentang Reuse (menggunakan kembali) ?

a. Menggunakan kembali sampah yang bisa digunakan kembali
b. Menggunakan kembali sampah yang telah didaur ulang
c. Tidak tahu

9. Apa yang ibu/bapak ketahui tentang Recycle (mendaur ulang sampah) ?

a. Mengubah sampah menjadi barang baru yang siap pakai
b. Menggunakan barang lama menjadi barang yang dipakai lagi
c. Tidak tahu

C. Sikap

1.Apakah ibu/bapak setuju bahwa sampah harus dipisahkan antara yang yang mudah membusuk dan
tidak mudah membusuk ?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

3. Apakah ibu/bapak setuju tiap rumah tangga harus melakukan pemisahan sampah ?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

4. Apakah ibu setuju sampah yang dihasilkan tiap rumah tangga sebisa mungkin harus dikurangi
jumlahnya untuk mengurangi dampak negatif akibat sampah ?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

5. Apakah ibu setuju sebaiknya ibu rumah tangga menggunakan barang-barang yang dapat digunakan
kembali untuk mengurangi produksi sampah?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

6. Apakah ibu setuju sebaiknya sampah dimanfaatkan kembali sehingga bernilai positif untuk hal-hal
tertentu?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

7. Apakah ibu setuju sebaiknya sampah yang masih bisa dipakai tidak dibuang tetapi dimanfaatkan
kembali?
a. Setuju
b. Kurang setuju
c. Tidak setuju

D. Pengelolaan Sampah

1.Berapa banyak sampah yang dihasilkan rumah tangga tiap harinya?

a. <0,5 kg/hr
b. 0,5 kg/hr -1 kg/hr
c. >1 kg/hr

2. Apakah ada perlakuan tertentu sebelum sampah dibuang?

a. Pernah
b. Tidak Pernah

3. Apakah bentuk perlakuan yang dilakukan terhadap sampah sebelum dibuang?

a. Dibakar
b. Dikemas dikantong plastik
c. Dipilah-pilah

4. Dalam pengumpulan sampah, wadah atau tempat sampah apa yang sering digunakan oleh rumah
tangga?
a. Keranjang
b. Ember
c. Ban bekas
d.Kantong Plastik
e. Lainnya

5. Bagaimana anda dalam membuang sampah setiap harinya?

a. Dibiarkan
b. Dibuang ke sungai
c. Dibakar
d.Ditimbun
e.Dikumpulkan
f.Diolah kembali
g.Lainnya.....

6. Apakah upaya yang anda anda lakukan untuk memanfaatkan sampah?

a. Mendaur ulang
b. Dijual
c. Melakukan pengomposan
d. Lainnya.......
D. Kegiatan Sosial

1.Apakah ada embaga sosial yang melakukan sosialisasi mengenai pengelolaan sampah?
a. Pernah
b.Tidak pernah

2.Siapakah yang melakukan sosialisasi?

a. Penduduk Asli/sekitar
b. LSM/Pakar/Ahli Sampah
c.Pemerintah

3. Jenis sosialisasi yang dilakukan?

a. Keterampilan/ Mendaur ulang
b. Membuat bank sampah
c. Memilah
d.Lainnya.................

4. Adakah bantuan pengelolaan sampah?

a. Ada
b.Tidak

5. Jenis bantuan yang diberikan?

a.Uang
b.Tempat sampah
c.Gerobak
d.Lainnya............
Pengetahuan

No. Pertanyaan Jawaban

[A] reuse, recycle, result

Yang dimaksud dengan
6. pengelolaan sampah dengan
prinsip 3R adalah…
(memakai kembali, daur ulang, hasil)
[B] reuse, restore, recycle
(memakai kembali, menyimpan, daur ulang)
:
[C] reduce, reuse, recycle
(mengurangi, memakai kembali, daur ulang)
[D] reduce, restore, result
(mengurangi, menyimpan, hasil)

[A] menambah lama waktu pengelolaan sampah

Yang tidak termasuk manfaat
7. dari pengelolaan sampah
dengan prinsip 3R adalah…
rumah tangga
[B] mengurangi kebutuhan lahan tempat
pembuangan sampah akhir
:
[C] membantu pengelolaan sampah secara dini
dan cepat
[D] menghemat biaya pengangkutan sampah ke
tempat pembuangan akhir

[A] dibuang ke selokan

Sampah yang sudah terkumpul [B] dibakar
8. :
sebaiknya… [C] didaur ulang
[D] disembunyikan
[A] organik
Sampah yang dapat dijadikan
[B] anorganik
9. sebagai pupuk kompos adalah :
[C] plastik
sampah…
[D] botol/kaleng
[A] memperbaiki struktur tanah
Berikut ini adalah manfaat yang
[B] mengurangi kebutuhan pupuk kimia
10. didapat dari pupuk kompos, :
[C] meningkatkan oksigen dalam tanah
kecuali…
[D] membuat tanaman berumur pendek
[A] daun-daunan, sisa makanan, sisa sayuran
Yang termasuk ke dalam
[B] kertas, kain, daun-daunan
11. kategori sampah organik :
[C] sisa makanan, botol-botolan, kertas
adalah…
[D] sisa sayuran, plastik, kertas
[A] sterofoam
Sampah berikut adalah jenis
[B] sisa makanan
12. sampah yang sulit terurai, :
[C] plastik
kecuali…
[D] kain

Timbunan sampah yang [A] sumber penyakit

dibiarkan dan tidak dikelola [B] banjir
13. :
dapat menimbulkan dampak [C] pencemaran udara
buruk seperti berikut, kecuali… [D] lingkungan asri

Pengalaman

Berilah tanda centang (✓) pada
14. kegiatan yang pernah Anda
lakukan
(boleh lebih dari satu)
[ ]
mengolah sampah menjadi kompos
[ ]
membuat kerajinan dari barang bekas
[ ]
memilah sampah organik dan anorganik
[ ]
menabung sampah di bank sampah
[ ]
memindahkan sampah ke TPS
: [ ]
kerja bakti membersihkan lingkungan
[ ]
mengikuti kegiatan/pelatihan yang diseleng-
garakan oleh lembaga yang mengelola
sampah rumah tangga
[ ] mengikuti sosialisasi/penyuluhan mengenai
pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga
 I. BAGIAN 2 – Faktor Eksternal Individu
Petunjuk pengisian: Berilah tanda centang (✓) pada jawaban yang Anda anggap sesuai.
FAKTOR EKSTERNAL INDIVIDU
A. Peran Pemerintah/Tokoh Masyarakat
No. Pertanyaan Ya Tidak
Apakah pernah ada kegiatan oleh ketua RT/RW mengenai pengelolaan
15.
sampah rumah tangga di daerah Anda tinggal?

16. Apakah kegiatan tersebut diadakan secara rutin?

Apakah pernah ada pelatihan mengenai pengelolaan sampah rumah

17.
tangga oleh pihak pemerintah di daerah Anda tinggal?
18. Apakah pelatihan tersebut diadakan secara rutin?
Apakah tokoh masyarakat memberikan contoh kepada masyarakat untuk
19.
melaksanakan pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga?

Apakah tokoh masyarakat mengimbau masyarakat untuk melakukan

20.
pengelolaan sampah tangga?

Apakah tokoh masyarakat mengajak untuk berdiskusi mengenai masalah

21.
persampahan?

Apakah tokoh masyarakat menegur ketika ada warga yang membuang

22.
sampah sembarangan?

Apakah masyarakat saling mengingatkan untuk melakukan pengelolaan

23.
sampah rumah tangga?

B. Sarana dan Prasarana

No. Pertanyaan Ya Tidak

Apakah di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda tersedia tong sampah yang

24.
memisahkan antara sampah organik dan sampah anorganik?

Apakah tong sampah yang tersedia di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda

25.
jumlahnya sudah mencukupi?

Apakah di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda terdapat fasilitas untuk

26.
mengolah sampah rumah tangga menjadi pupuk kompos?

Apakah di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda terdapat jasa pengang-kutan

27.
sampah rumah tangga secara rutin?

Apakah di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda terdapat tempat pembuangan

28.
sampah terpadu?

Apakah di lingkungan tempat tinggal Anda terdapat lembaga yang

29.
khusus bergerak di bidang pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga?

II. BAGIAN 3 – Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga

Petunjuk pengisian: Berilah tanda centang (✓) pada jawaban yang Anda anggap paling sesuai.
S = Setuju
CS = Cukup Setuju
KS = Kurang Setuju
TS = Tidak Setuju

PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP

PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA

No. Pernyataan S CS KS TS
30. Sampah rumah tangga perlu dikelola setiap hari

Sampah rumah tangga yang dibiarkan menumpuk dapat

31.
menimbulkan dampak buruk bagi lingkungan

Sampah organik dan sampah anorganik harus dipilah

32.
sebelum dibuang ke tempat sampah

Pengolahan sampah rumah tangga menjadi kompos

33.
memberikan manfaat bagi Anda

Pemakaian plastik sebaiknya dikurangi karena plastik sulit

34.
terurai secara alami

Sampah yang masih dapat dipakai sebaiknya dimanfaatkan

35.
kembali

Pemindahan sampah ke tempat pembuangan sementara

36. penting dilakukan agar tidak terjadi penumpukan sampah
rumah tangga

37. Pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga mudah dilakukan

Pengelolaan sampah dengan prinsip 3R merupakan cara

38. yang efisien dalam mengatasi masalah mengenai sampah
rumah tangga

Pembayaran biaya retribusi untuk fasilitas pengelolaan

39.
sampah perlu dilakukan secara rutin

III. BAGIAN 4 – Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga

Petunjuk pengisian: Berilah tanda centang (✓) pada jawaban yang Anda anggap paling sesuai.
TP = Tidak Pernah
J = Jarang
CS = Cukup Sering
S = Sering

PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM

PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA
A. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Secara Langsung
No. Pernyataan TP J CS S
40. Memilah sampah organik dan anorganik
41. Membawa wadah sendiri ketika berbelanja
42. Menghemat penggunaan plastik
43. Menggunakan kertas pada kedua sisinya
44. Membawa sampah ke tempat pembuangan sementara
45. Menabung sampah di bank sampah
Memanfaatkan kembali botol/kaleng yang masih dapat
46.
digunakan
47. Membuat kerajinan dari barang bekas
48. Mendaur ulang sampah menjadi pupuk kompos
49. Mengikuti kegiatan kebersihan seperti kerja bakti
B. Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Secara Tidak Langsung
No. Pernyataan TP J CS S
Memberikan saran/kritik mengenai pengelolaan sampah
50.
rumah tangga kepada pengurus RT/RW

Mendiskusikan tentang pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga

51.
bersama warga yang lainnya

Mengikuti penyuluhan atau sosialisasi mengenai

52.
pengelolaan sampah rumah tangga

Mengikuti pelatihan mengenai pengelolaan sampah rumah

53.
tangga

Membayar biaya retribusi untuk meningkatkan fasilitas

54.
pengelolaan sampah
APPENDIX B

Rumah tangga
1. Identitas, pekerjaan, dan jumlah orang yang tinggal dirumah?
2. Berapa sampah yang dihasilkan perhari?
3. Jenis sampah apa saja yang dihasilkan?
4. Berapa banyak penggunaan kantong plastik per hari? Untuk apa saja?
5. Apakah sampah tsb dipilah/ tidak?
6. Jika dipilah bagaimana cara memilahnya? Jika tidak, apa kendalanya?
7. Apakah sudah melakukan reuse/recycle?
8. Potensi barang untuk didaur ulang barang apa saja jadi apa saja?
9. Tindakan terhadap barang yang tidak terpakai? Buang/pisah/jual?
10. Apakah mengetahui tentang composting? Melakukan composting atau tidak? Kendala?
11. Ada bank sampah apa tidak?
12. Adakah kegiatan daur ulang sampah tingkat komunitas/ rt? Kalau ada apa?
13. Menurut pendapat pewawancara, pengelolaan sampah yang baik itu seperti apa? Kalau
sekarang kondisinya sendiri bagaimana? Jika diberi fasilitas bersedia atau tidak?

Rumah 1

1. Pak soim, pembantu rumah tangga dan penjaga kosan, 17 orang

2. 15 kantong plastik indomaret/2 hari
3. Organik dan anorganik
4. 50%, sampah bungkus makanan
 5. Ya
6. Hanya diambil yang botol plastik, kardus untuk dijual ke bank sampah.
7. Tidak
8. Sudah
9. Dipisah dulu, kasih saudara, kalau ngga terpaksa dijual
10. Tahu, belum.
11. Ada
12. Ada, bank sampah di tubis 15 diwadahi ibu-ibu pkk

Rumah 2

1. Pak hendi rustandi dan bu ani gustini, pekerjaan di media surat kabar pikiran rakyat, 2
juta/bulan. 4 orang.
2. 2 kresek/2-3 hari
3. Anorganik dan organik
4. 30%, sampah bungkus makanan
5. Ya
6. Dipilah yang kardus, botol ditaruh di bank sampah
7. Sudah
8. Handuk dijadikan kain pel
9. Dipisah dulu, kasih saudara, kalau ngga terpaksa dijual
10. Tahu, belum, karena tidak ada lahan dan belum adanya sosialisasi dari kelurahan/ rt
setempat
 11. Ada, di tubis 15 dikelola ibu-ibu pkk kegiatan pengumpulan dalam 1 bulan 3x biasanya
tiap hari selasa dan kamis, sistem jual per kilo lalu ditabung dulu, keuntungan diberikan
tiap bulannya.
12. Sudah, yaitu bank sampah
13. Kalau ada fasilitas ingin ada sosialisasi composting dan pelatihan ibu-ibu pkk membuat
kerajinan dari sampah

Rumah 3

1. Ryananda wira, mahasiswa itb, gaji orang tua 13 juta/bulan, 5 orang

2. 1 trashbag besar/2-3 hari penuh
3. Organik dan anorganik
4. 40%, bungkus makanan
5. Tidak dipilah
6. Karena kalau dipilah nanti juga disatuin sama tukang sampahnya. Tapi sampah organik
sisa makanan diberikan ke kucing
7. Sudah
8. Membuat kerajinan, handuk jadi kain pel, kertas bekas untuk coret-coret lagi supaya ngga
beli. Reduce selama ini pakai tupperware, tumbler
9. Ditaruh di gudang, kalau sudah benar-benar tidak dipakai dijual ke tukang loak
10. Tahu, kakak yang melakukan
11. Ada, di tubis 15 tapi jauh
12. Belum ada hanya diangkut tukang sampah
13. Semua masyarakat dalam mengelola sampah dipilah dulu dari sumbernya agar setelah
dipilah tidak disatukan kembali
Pemulung
 Jenis sampah apa saja yang dikumpulkan?
 Setelah dikumpulkan, sampah dijual kemana?
 Berapa harga tiap barang yang dijual?
 Area kerja atau area operasinya dimana?
 Alur sampah secara detail?
 Berapa penghasilan /hari?
 Adakah komunitas? Atau kegiatan ini bersifat swadaya?
 Bagaimana peran pemerintah terhadap mereka?
 Harapan mereka terhadap pengelolaan sampah?
 Adakah keinginan daur ulang sampah? Contohnya?

Pemulung 1

1. Biyan, asal cimahi

2. Kardus, botol, dan koran
3. Setelah dikumpulkan sampah dijual ke tukang rosok
4. Untuk botol 1500/kg, kardus 1000/kg
5. Di daerah cigadung, cibeunying, cipaheut
6. Dari komplek-komplek besar sampah dibuang di tempat sampah depan rumah, lalu pak
biyan mengambil, lalu dijual ke tukang rongsok di cipaheut. Dengan pengambilan 3x
bolak balik komplek tempat ambil sampah ke rumahnya. Jam operasi 06.00-09.00, 09.00-
12.00, dan 12.00-15.00
7. Sehari bisa dapat 3 karung, pendapatan per hari 40-50 rb
 8. Bersifat swadaya untuk memenuhi kebutuhan rumah tangga pribadi
9. Pak biyan setuju dengan upaya pemerintah lewat rt maupun desa dengan adanya bank
sampah, meskipun penghasilannya mulai berkurang, tapi pak biyan tidak
mempermasalahkan karena rezeki sudah diatur oleh allah. Namun, pak biyan berharap
yang memanfaatkan menjual barang ke bank sampah adalah masyarakat menengah ke
bawah, sedangkan masyarakat ekonomi ke atas menurutnya tidak layak untuk menjual
barang tersebut.
10. Pak biyan selama ini memakai lagi barang hasil pemulungnya yaitu gelas, mangkuk yang
dibuang ke tempat sampah.

Pemulung 2

1. Pak dede, asal cibiru

2. Kardus, kertas, botol plastik
3. Kardus 1500/kg, kertas 1000/kg, botol plastik 2000/kg, kertas duplex 300/kg
4. Cigadung, cibeunying
5. Dari komplek-komplek besar sampah dibuang di tempat sampah depan rumah, lalu pak
dede mengambil, lalu dijual ke tukang rongsok di cibeunying . Dengan pengambilan 4x
bolak balik komplek tempat ambil sampah ke rumahnya. Jam operasi 08.00-16.00.
6. Sehari dapat 1 kuintal, pendapatan 100 ribu/hari
7. Tidak, sifat swadaya
8. Dengan adanya bank sampah penghasilan berkurang 2x lipat. Tidak berharap banyak ke
pemerintah, yang penting tetap bisa cari nafkah
9. Belum ada hanya menjual saja
Tukang loak
 Membeli barang bekas jenis apa saja?
 Setelah dibeli barang dijual kemana?
 Harga barang bekas dijual berapa?
 Area kerja atau area operasinya dimana?
 Alur sampah secara detail?
 Berapa penghasilan /hari?
 Adakah komunitas? Atau kegiatan ini bersifat swadaya?
 Bagaimana peran pemerintah terhadap mereka?
 Harapan mereka terhadap pengelolaan sampah?
 Adakah keinginan daur ulang sampah? Contohnya?

Tukang loak 1

1. Pak usup, asal ciroyom

2. Koran, kardus, besi, plastik, cd, dan buku
3. Dijual ke pengepul
4. Koran 2000/kg, kardus 1000/kg, besi 2000/kg, plastik 2000/kg, buku harga relatif
5. Cigadung, dago, panhegar, sadang serang
6. Pak usup keliling daerah-daerah operasi, ibu-ibu yang ingin meloakkan akan memanggil.
Pak usup membeli barang dan menjual lagi ke pengepul di sadang serang. Keuntungan
penjualan perkilo 500 rupiah.
7. Per hari berhasil mengumpulkan barang 70 kg, pendapatan 80 rb/hari
8. Sifat swadaya untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidup
 9. Harapannya tetap bisa cari uang, pemerintah ngga melarang ini itu
10. Belum ada sebatas jual dan beli

Tukang loak 2

1. Pak doyok, asal ciamis

2. Koran, kardus, besi, gelas/botol plastik, barang bekas (tv, radio)
3. Dijual ke pengepul
4. Koran 1500/kg, kardus 1500/kg, besi 2000/kg, plastik 2000/kg.
5. Cisitu, kanayakan, tubagus ismail
6. Pak doyok keliling daerah-daerah operasi, ibu-ibu yang ingin meloakkan akan
memanggil. Pak usup membeli barang dan menjual lagi ke pengepul di sadang serang.
Keuntungan penjualan perkilo 500 rupiah.
7. Pendapatan per hari 50-100 rb
8. Sifat komunitas beberapa teman, memiliki bos
9. Harapannya tetap bisa cari uang, pemerintah ngga melarang ini itu
10. Belum ada sebatas jual dan beli

Tukang sampah
 Jenis sampah apa saja yang ada?
 Dipilah atau tidak? Jika dipilah bagaimana caranya?
 Area kerja atau area operasinya dimana?
 Alur sampah secara detail?
 Berapa penghasilan /hari?
  Adakah komunitas? Atau kegiatan ini bersifat swadaya?
 Bagaimana peran pemerintah terhadap mereka?
 Harapan mereka terhadap pengelolaan sampah?
 Adakah keinginan daur ulang sampah? Contohnya?

Tukang sampah

1. Pak Nanda, asal Garut

2. Organik dan anorganik
3. Dipilah sendiri oleh Pak Nanda, botol dan kaleng akan dijual Pak Nanda ke tukang loak.
4. Ciheulang RT 06 RW 05
5. Pak Nanda mengangkut sampah dari rumah ke rumah di daerah operasinya lalu
disalurkan ke TPS Taman sari dengan jam kerja pengangkutan 06.00-12.00
6. Per bulan 600 ribu, digaji oleh RT yang memperkerjakan dan memperoleh tambahan dari
menjual sampah yang dipilah 15 ribu/hari.
7. Harapan pemerintah tetap mempekerjakannya, dan Pak Nanda berharap jangan ada bank
sampah. Bank sampah mengurangi penghasilan Pak Nanda.
8. Belum ada
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
Pertanyaan untuk pemulung
1. Jenis sampah atau barang bekas apa saja yang dikumpulkan untuk dijual?
2. Banyaknya sampah atau barang bekas yang dikumpulkan per hari?
3. Berapa harga jual per jenis barang bekas atau sampah tersebut?
Jenis Botol = Rp /Kg
Jenis botol gelas= Rp /Kg
Jenis Logam atau besi =Rp /Kg
Jenis Kertas =Rp /Kg

4. Sampah-sampah dikumpulkan dari daerah mana saja?

5. Dari hasil pengumpulan tersebut biasanya dijual kemana?
6. Berapa pendapatan yang diperoleh sari hasil penjualan barang bekas yang dikumpulkan
tersebut?
7. Apakah ada pihak lain yang menangani sampah tersebut selain pemulung yang terlibat
dalam pendau ulangan sampah?
8. Selama bekerja, apakah ada dari rumah warga, atau kantor yang dilihat melakukan
pengolahan atau pemanfaatan kembali sehingga sampah yang dihasilkan sedikit di rumah
atau diikantor tersebut?
9. Bagaimana pandangan terhadap masalah pemanfaatan sampah untuk mendukung sistem
pegolahan sampah?
10. Dan bagaimana harapan kedepannya masalah pengelolaan sampah atau sistem
pengelolaan sampah ini?
Jawaban
Pemulung 1 Sobana, 65, garut

1. Botol plastik, gelas plastik, kaleng, kardus

2. 50kg
3. Botol 300
Gelas 2000
Kaleng 300
 Kardus 1000
4. DU, Monju, Dago
5. Teuku Umar
6. 50 ribu/ hari
7. Bank sampah
8. – ga ngerti bapaknya
9. Bank sampahnya secara ga langsung ambil peluang pekerja sampah informal
Pemulung 2 Giman 60,

1. Botol plastik, gelas plastik

2. 50 kg
3. Botol 300
Gelas 2000
4. Cisitu, Monju, Cihampelas
5. Monumen
6. 50 ribu/ hari
7. – gangerti bapaknya
8. – ga ngerti bapaknya
9. – gaaada
10.
Pertanyaan untuk Tukang Loak
1. Jenis sampah atau barang bekas seperti apa yang biasnya dikumpulkan untuk dibeli,
2. Banyaknya sampah atau barang bekas yang dikumpulkan? / hari
3. Biasnya harga beli per jenis barang bekas atau sampah tersebut berapa?
Jenis Botol = Rp /Kg
Jenis botol gelas= Rp /Kg
Jenis Logam atau besi =Rp /Kg
Jenis Kertas =Rp /Kg
4. Dan Biasnya harga jual ke pabrik per jenis barang bekas atau sampah tersebut berapa?
Jenis Botol = Rp /Kg
Jenis botol gelas= Rp /Kg
Jenis Logam atau besi =Rp /Kg
Jenis Kertas =Rp /Kg
5. Biasanya Daerah operasi untuk bekerja dimana?
6. Dari hasil pengmpulan tersebut biasnya dijual kemana atau kesiapa?
7. Berapa pendapatan yang diperoleh sari hasil penjualan barang bekas yang dikumpulkan
tersebut
8. Apakah ada pihak lain yang menangani sampah tersebut selain pemulung yang terlibat
dalam pendaurulangan sampah ?
9. Selama bapak /mas/ ibu bekerja , apakah ada dari rumah warga, atau kantor yang dilihat
melakukan pengolahan atau pemanfaatan kembali sehingga sampah yang dihasilkan
sedikit di rumah atau diikantor tersebut?
10. Bagaimana pandangan bapak /mas/ibu, masalah pemanfaatan sampah untuk mendukung
sistem pegolahan sampah
11. Dan bagaimana harapan kedepannya masalah pengelolaan sampah atau sistem
pengelolaan sampah ini?
Jawaban
Tukang loak 1
Asep, 30, banjar
 1. Botol plastik, gelas plastik
2. 100-200 kg
3. Botol 300
Kaleng 400
Gelas 2000
4. Gelas plastik 3300
Biasanya untung 60-70% harga beli
5. Cigonewa
6. Saadang serang, cigadung
7. 3 juta per bulan
8. gaada
9. bank sampah
10. –gaada tanggapan
11. Bank sampah mengambil peluang untuk pekerja sampah informal
Tukang loak 2 Atang, 32

1. Botol plastik, gelas plastik, kaleng kompor gas, ember, kardus

2. 100 -200kg
3. Botol 300
 Kaleng 300
Gelas 2000
Kardus 1300
Ember 2000
4. Biasanya ambil untung 50~% harga beli (sorry ga jawab yg spesifik
5. Jalan sumatra, cilaki
6. Cibaduyut
7. 4 juta per bulan
8. Dipilah
9. gaada
10. –gaada tanggapan
11. –ga ada tanggapan
Pertanyaan untuk Pengumpul Sampah

1. Jenis sampah atau barang bekas seperti apa yang biasnya dikumpulkan untuk dijual
2. Banyaknya sampah atau barang bekas yang dikumpulkan? / hari
3. Biasnya harga jual per jenis barang bekas atau sampah tersebut berapa?
Jenis Botol = Rp /Kg
Jenis botol gelas= Rp /Kg
Jenis Logam atau besi =Rp /Kg
Jenis Kertas =Rp /Kg
4. Biasanya Daerah operasi untuk bekerja dimana?
5. Dari hasil pengmpulan tersebut biasnya dijual kemana atau kesiapa?
6. Berapa pendapatan yang diperoleh sari hasil penjualan barang bekas yang dikumpulkan
tersebut
7. Apakah ada pihak lain yang menangani sampah tersebut selain pemulung yang terlibat
dalam pendau ulangan sampah ?
8. Selama bapak /mas/ ibu bekerja , apakah ada dari rumah warga, atau kantor yang dilihat
melakukan pengolahan atau pemanfaatan kembali sehingga sampah yang dihasilkan
sedikit di rumah atau diikantor tersebut?
9. Bagaimana pandangan bapak /mas/ibu, masalah pemanfaatan sampah untuk mendukung
sistem pegolahan sampah
10. Dan bagaimana harapan kedepannya masalah pengelolaan sampah atau sistem
pengelolaan sampah ini?

Pekerja/pengumpul sampah
Endang 60, garut
1. Macam-macam mulai dari anorganik(plastik,botol, kertas dll) dan yang organik juga
2. 1 rumah 1 kantong plastik( 1kg), penuh 1 roda(angkutan sampah yg dari pemerintah)/ 2
hari
3. 1500/ kg campur
4. Taman sari, kebon bibit
5. Jalan ambon
6. 300/ bulan + biaya angkut rt rw 800/ bulan
7. – ga ngerti bapaknya
8. Bank sampah
9. –gaada tanggapan
10. Buat lagi tps deket bawah fly over pasupati