You are on page 1of 5

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Subspace of Mn (ℤ2)
To cite this article: Yanita and A Adrianda 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1217 012070

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 180.241.135.87 on 19/06/2019 at 16:11


ISNPINSA 2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1217 (2019) 012070 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012070

Subspace of ( )

Yanita and A Adrianda


Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
Andalas University, Kampus Unand Limau Manis Padang 25163, Indonesia
Email: yanita3010@gmail.com

Abstract. This paper discusses the subspace of the set of matrices over the set of integers
modulo 2, symbolized by ( ). This set ( ) is a vector space over with scalar
matrix multiplication and addition modulo n on matrices of ( ). Will be given properties
that proper subset and proper a subgroup of ( ) which is a subspace of ( ). It’s
used ( ) to illustration the proof of the theorems.

1. Introduction
Let’s begin with the definition vector space and subspace and then the theorem about subspaces used
in this article.
Definition 1.1 [1] Let be a field, whose elements are referred to a scalars. A vector space over
is a nonempty se , whose element are referred to as vectors, together with two operations. The first
operation, called addition and denoted by , assign to each pair ( ) of vectors in a vector
in . The second operation, called scalar multiplication and denoted by juxtaposition,
assigns to each pair ( ) a vector ru in . Furthermore, the following properties must be
satisfied: associativity of addition, commtativity of addition, existence of a the zero, existence of athe
dditive invers and properties of scalar.
Definition 1.2 [1] A subspace of a vector space is a subset of that is a vector space in its own
right under the operations obtained by restricting the operations of to .
Theorem 1.1 [1] A nonempty subset of a vector space is a subspace of if and only if is
closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
If and are subspaces of vector space , then we may always say that the sum
exists, and the fact is that is a subspace of too.

2. Vector Space ( )
We give an illustration to this article with the ( ) vector space.
̅
The first, we list element of ( ) {[ ̅ ] |̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ } , that is
̅ ̅
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
[ ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ],
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
[ ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ], [ ],
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
[ ], [ ], [ ], [ ].
̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
ISNPINSA 2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1217 (2019) 012070 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012070

Using combinatoric theory, we can get the element of ( ) using formula , since there are 4
elements in matrix , and there are 2 elements in .

Next, if we apply addition modulo 2 on on matrices of ( ), then we have that


( ) is a group (see Table 1).
Table 1. Table Cayley of on matrices of ( ) over addition modulo 2

Furthermore, if we apply scalar multiplication on the element of moreover, matrices on


( ), then we have
Table 2. Scalar multiplication on the element of moreover, matrices on ( )

̅
̅

Based on Table 1. and Table 2. It is concluded that ( ) is vector space over . It’s known that
set ( ) has subsets, and certainly not all are subspaces.
This paper aims to identify the subsets of ( ) which is a subspace of ( ). We
provide illustrations on ( ). There are 3 properties given in this case; it gives a condition a
subset of ( ) is subspace of ( ). It’s shown that three conditions for proper a subset of
( ) which is subspacea of ( ).
Lemma 2.1 Let * | ( ) +, then is subspace of ( ).
Proof.
Clear that ( ) and . Let , and set . Note that for each ( ),
, so and we have . Thus, for each ,
. Furthermore, if ̅ we have and if ̅ , we have for every
. Thus, for every and , .

Lemma 2.2 Let * | ( ) +, then is


subspace of ( ).

2
ISNPINSA 2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1217 (2019) 012070 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012070

Proof.
Clear that ( ) and . Let . Since () is vector space, so
for each . Note that, if and , we have (remember
that and imply that , and based on Lemma 1.1,
). Analogously, we have Based on this, it’s found that for every ,
. Furthermore, if ̅ we have and if ̅ , we have for every
. Thus, for every and , .

Lemma 2.3 Let * | ( ) +,


then is subspace of ( ) whenever ,
, .

Proof.
Analogously with Lemma 2.2.
The next properties associates to subgroup of ( ), that is condition of proper subgroup
of ( ) which is subspace of ( ).

Based on Lemma 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, it’s concuded that subspace of ( ) is subgroup of
( ).

Theorem 2.1 Let subset of ( ), if is a subgroup of ( ) then is a subspace of


( ).

Proof.
Lagrange Theorem states that for any finite group , the order (number of elements) of every
subgroup of divides the order of [2]. Thus, for the group ( ) over addition modulo 2 can
be concluded that the order of subgroups are 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. Every group has 2 subgroup trivial,
that is * + ( is identity element) and , so group ( ) over addition modulo 2 has * + and
( ) as trivial subgroup.
Thus * + and ( ) are subspace in ( ) , see [1]. Let be a subgroup of ( ).
Lemma 2. 1, Lemma 2. 2, and Lemma 2. 3 describes a subset of ( ) whose number of elements
is 2, 4 and 8 which satisfies the subspace properties and it’s known that is a subgroup. This
complete the proof.

3. Vector Space ( )
We repeat Theorem 2.1 in general case
Theorem 3.1 Let subset of ( ), if is a subgroup of ( )( ) then is subspace
of ( ).

Proof.
Proof has been given for .
For , we have number of elements of ( ) are and in general we, have elements
for ( ). From this, explicit that the number of elements from ( ) has no prime number.
Thus, based on proof of , it can be done for .
In group theory also has the property that the sum of 2 or more subgroups is also subgroup
([3] and [4]). We use Lagrange Theorem to find the whole of order subgroup of ( ). Let be
a proper subgroup of ( ) and | | and |( ). We write that
* +, is identity matrix in ( ). Since is group under matrix multiplication
modulo and is closed under scalar multiplication matrix and element of , so this complete the
proof.

References

3
ISNPINSA 2018 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1217 (2019) 012070 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012070

[1] Roman S 2008 Advanced Linear Algebra (New York: Springer Sciences+Bussiness Media).
[2] Roth R 2001 Mathematics Magazine 74 99
[3] Gallian J 2006 Contemporary Abstract Algebra 6th 9Boston: Houghton Mifflin).
[4] Grillet P 2007 Abstract Algebra 2nd (New York: Springer, Sciences+Bussiness Media).

You might also like