You are on page 1of 72

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region 02
Schools Division of Batanes
TUKON BARRIO SCHOOL
Basco
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW
Name of Employee : ADOR R. BALLADA Name of Rater:GEORGANN
., CESE G. CARIASO, CES
Position : Head Teacher I Position: OIC-Assistant Schools Division Sup
Review Period : Date of Review:
Division : Batanes

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Q
Maintained 0 Has 1 drop-out Has 2 drop-out Has 3 drop-out Has 4 or more
drop-out drop-out

4 or more
1.1.1. Achieved no pupil at risk 1 pupil at risk 2 pupils at risk 3 pupils at risk pupils
E at risk of
zero dropout rate of dropping out of dropping out of dropping out of dropping out dropping out

1 drop out in 2 drop out in 3 drop out in 4 drop out in


0 drop out in
T April 2019 February-April February-April February-April February-April
2019 2019 2019 2019

80 % t0 100% 60% t0 81 % of 50% t0 59% of 30% t0 49% of 39% & below


of the pupils the pupils the pupils the pupils of the pupils
Q achieved 75% achieved 75% achieved 75% achieved 75% achieved 75%
MPS in MPS in MPS in MPS in MPS in
DAT/NAT DAT/NAT DAT/NAT DAT/NAT DAT/NAT
of Quality Basic Educaton

hool Leadreship (20%)

1.1. Aligned 1.1.2. Achieved


SIP/AIP 75% MPS in
Programs and NAT/DAT
projects with
natonal, Feb-April 8%
regional and 2018
local
educatonal
goals, policies
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton

1. School Leadreship (20%)


1.1. Aligned 1.1.2. Achieved
SIP/AIP 75% MPS in
Programs and NAT/DAT
projects with Achieved 70% Achieved 60% Achieved 50% Achieved 40% Achieved 39%
natonal, Feb-April E to 75% MPS in to 69% MPS in to 59% MPS in to 49 % MPS & below MPS
8%
regional and 2018 DAT/NAT DAT/NAT DAT/NAT in DAT/NAT in DAT/NAT
local
educatonal
goals, policies
and thrusts
T

Achieved .5
Achieved 1.5 Achieved 1 to Achieved 0.9 to Achieved .6 to
and below
Q or higher score 1.4 score in the 0.5score in the 1 score in the
score in the
in the SBM SBM SBM SBM
SBM
assessment. assessment. assessment. assessment.
assessment.
Prepared a
Prepared an Prepared an
1.1.3. Increased complete, Prepared an an Had an increse
acceptable but acceptable but
SBM level of E comprehensive incomplete but no MOV
with 1 needed with 2 needed
practice by 0.5 and aceptable MOV presented
points MOVs missing MOVs missing
MOVs needed

Has complied Has complied Has compiled Has compiled


Attained Level
50% of the 40% of the 20% of the 10% of the
T 1.5 SBM level necessary necessary necessary necessary
of Practice by
documents by documents by documents by documents by
April 2019
April 2019 April 2019 April 2019 April 2019

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Q No submitted
Submit 4 SMEA Submit 3 SMEA Submit 2 SMEA Submit 1 SMEA
SMEA

Prepared an
Prepared an Prepared SMEA Prepared SMEA
E error-free but Prepared an
error-free and but with minor with a major
incomplete eroneous SMEA
1.2.1. Conducted complete SMEA corrections. corrections.
SMEA
SMEA (Quarterly)

1.2. Involved
1.2.1. Conducted
SMEA (Quarterly)

Submit quarterly Submit quarterly Submit quarterly


Submit quarterly Submit quarterly
SMEA report SMEA report SMEA report
T SMEA report on SMEA report
with 2 days with 3 days with 1 week or
time. with 1 day delay.
delay. delay. more delay.
1.2. Involved
all internal and
external Feb-April
stakeholders in Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted
developing/cra 2018 SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review No acceptable
fting/reviewin Q with complete with 1 rep. with 2 rep. with 3 rep. SIP/AIP review
g the SIP/AIP participation of stakeholder stakeholders stakeholders conducted.
stakeholders. absent. absent. absent.

1.2.2. Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted


SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review SIP/AIP review
SIP/AIP annual
review E with 4 or more with 3 with 2 with 1 but with no
improvement improvement improvement improvement improvement
plans plans plans plans plans

7% Conducted Conducted
Conducted Conducted Conducted
SIP/AIP annual SIP/AIP annual
SIP/AIP annual SIP/AIP annual SIP/AIP annual
T review on or
review one
review 2 months review 3 months
review 4 or
month after months after
before December after December after December
December December

Organized Organized Organized Organized Organized


teams/committee teams/committee teams/committee teams/committee teams/committee
Q s are functional s are functional s are functional s are functional s have no
with 4 programs with 3 programs with 2 programs with 1 programs programs and
and projects. and projects. and projects. and projects. projects.
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton

School Leadreship (20%%)

1.3.1. Organized
team and
committees with
work and
implementation
1.3. Organized plan
teams and
committees,
coordinated
and
collaborated
on planning,
implementato
n and
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton

School Leadreship (20%%)


1.3.1. Organized
team and
committees with
work and
implementation All programs and 3 of the programs 2 of the programs 1 of the programs
1.3. Organized plan projects have and projects have and projects have and projects have No programs and
teams and E successfully successfully successfully successfully projects
committees, implemented implemented implemented implemented implemented
coordinated with MsOV with MsOV with MsOV with MsOV
and
collaborated
on planning,
implementato
n and T
evaluaton of
programs and
projects

Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely


managed/supervi managed/supervi managed/supervi managed/supervi
sed/headed sed/headed sed/headed sed/headed
coordination and coordination and coordination and coordination and
No
collaboration collaboration collaboration collaboration
teams/commitees
Q meetings,confere meetings,confere meetings,confere meetings,confere
were organized
nces and nces and nces and nces and
on schedule
convergence as convergence as convergence as convergence as
evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown
by the MOV by the MOV by the MOV by the MOV
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.

1.3.2.
Managed/supervis
ed/headed
coordination and Feb-April Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
8% Submitted only 1
least 4 least 3 least 2
collaboration 2019 coordination/coll coordination/coll coordination/coll
coordination/coll
meetings, aboration
conference and aboration aboration aboration No acceptable
meetings,
convergence E meetings, meetings, meetings,
conferences and
evidence was
conferences and conferences and conferences and shown.
convergence
convergence convergence convergence
supported by any
supported by any supported by any supported by any
acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
T

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Organized/develo Organized/develo Organized/develo Organized/develo


Organized/develo
ped and ped and ped and ped and
ped and
implemented implemented implemented implemented
implemented
2.1.1. effective effective effective effective
effective
intervention intervention intervention intervention
Organized/devel Q
prorgram/s as prorgram/s as prorgram/s as prorgram/s as
intervention
oped and prorgram/s as
2.1. Utlized implemented evident in the evident in the evident in the evident in the
evident in the
assessment NAT scores of NAT scores of NAT scores of NAT scores of
intervention NAT scores of
results to programs 75% and above 65%-74% of all 55%-64% of all 45%-54% of all
44% and below
based of all pupils. pupils pupils pupils.
improve on assessment
learning result to
imp[rove 75% mastery 75% mastery 75% mastery 75% mastery
75% mastery
learning E level in 4 out of level in 3 out of level in 2 out of level in 1 out of
level in all
5 core learning 5 core learning 5 core learning 5 core learning
learning areas
areas areas. areas. areas.

Basic research
Basic research/CI Basic research Basic research
conducted/CI but Basic research/CI
conducted and proposal/ CI proposal/CI was
Q completed for
not completed
approved but not submitted but not
proposal was
for the school drafted
the school year. conducted approved.
year.

2.2.1. Conducted
CI
project/research February-
in the school April 2018 7%
Conducted the Conducted the Conducted the Conducted the
Conducted the
basic research/CI basic research/CI basic research/CI basic research/CI
2.2.1. Conducted E basic research/CI
with 10% over with 20% over with 30% over with 50% over
CI within the
the approved the approved the approved the approved
project/research February- approved budget.
budget. budget. budget. budget.
in the school April 2018 7%

Basic Basic Basic Basic


Basic reasearch
reasearch/CI was reasearch/CI was reasearch/CI was reasearch/CI was
was conducted/
conducted within conducted within conducted within conducted within
CI within the
the time frame the time frame the time frame the time frame
T time frame (July
(July to April) (July to April) (July to April) (July to April)
to April) and
and result and result and result and result
result submitted
submitted after 2 submitted after 3 submitted after 4 submitted after 5
in May 2018
months months months months

80 % t0 100% of 60 % t0 79% of 40% t0 59% of 20% t0 39% of 19 % & below


the teachers the teachers the teachers the teachers of the teachers
Q conducted Action conducted Action conducted Action conducted Action conducted Action
Research Research Research Research Research

2.2.2. Conducted action Conducted action Conducted action Conducted action


Conducted action
research within research 10% research 20% research 30%
Supervised the E the approved over the over the over the
research 50% the
conduct of group budget. approved budget. approved budget. approved budget.
approved budget.
or individual
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton

2. Instructonal Leadreship (20%)

researches of
teachers
Action reasearch Action reasearch Action reasearch Action reasearch Action reasearch
was conducted was conducted was conducted was conducted was conducted
within the school within the school within the school within the school within the school
T year and result year and result year and result year and result year and result
submitted in May submitted in July submitted in submitted in submitted in
2019 2019 September 2019 November 2019 December 2019

2.2. Managed
curriculum
initatves,
innovaton
and
enrichment
in line with
DepEd
policies
2. Instructonal Le
Delivery of Quality 2.2. Managed 80 % t0 100% of 60% t0 79% of 40% t0 59% of 20 % t0 39% of
19% of the
curriculum the teachers the teachers the teachers the teachers
teachers
initatves, developed at
Q developed 8 to developed 6 to 7 developed 4 to 5 developed 2 to 3
least 1
innovaton 10 instructional instructional instructional instructional
instructional
and materials materials materials materials
materials
enrichment
in line with
DepEd Instructional
Approval of
Approval of Developed
policies 2.2.3. materials
instructional Instructional
instructional instructional
Supervised the E approved in the
materials was on materials
materials was on materials but not
development of Division QA
process at the approved in the
process at the approved by the
Ims of teachers Division QA School QA team
team School QA team school QA team.
team

Instructional Instructional Instructional Instructional Instructional


materials materials materials materials materials
approved in the approved in the approved in the approved in the approved in the
T Division QA Division QA Division QA Division QA Division QA
team by April team by May team by June team by July team by August
2019 2019 2019 2019 2019

Implemented Implemented Implemented Implemented


Implemented
innovation/enrich innovation/enrich innovation/enrich innovation/enrich
innovation/enrich
ment program ment program ment program ment program
ment program
with approved with approved with proposal but without proposal
Q proposal and proposal but did not approved
without proposal
and did not
but submitted
submitted not submitted and submitted submitted
accomplishment
accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
report.
report. report. report report.

February- Submitted Submitted


5% Submitted Submitted Submitted
April 2018 innovation/enrich
innovation/enrich
innovation/enrich
innovation/enrich
innovation/enrich
2.2.4. ment program
ment program
ment program
ment program
ment program
Implemented proposal and proposal and
E proposal and
accomplishment
proposal and
accomplishment
proposal and
innovation/enric accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
report with report with
hment program report without
minimal
report with few
cosiderable
report with many
in the school correction
corrections
corrections
corrections
corrections
innovation/enric
hment program
in the school

Implemented
Implemented Implemented Implemented
innovation/enrich Implemented
innovation/enrich innovation/enrich innovation/enrich
ment program innovation/enrich
ment program ment program ment program
with approved ment program
with approved with proposal but without proposal
proposal within without proposal
T proposal and
the school year
not approved
but submitted
within the school
submitted and submitted year and did not
but did not accomplishment
accomplishment accomplishment submitted
submitted report on June
report on April report on May accomplishment
accomplishment 2019
2019 2019 report.
report.

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Conducted 9 or
Conducted 7-8 Conducted 5-6 Conducted 3-4 Conducted 1-2
more
instructional instructional instructional instructional
instructional
Q supervisory supervisory supervisory supervisory
supervisory
session and session and session and session and
session and
observation to observation to observation to observation to
observation to
teachers teachers teachers teachers
teachers

2.3.1. Conducted Executed 80% to Executed 70%- Executed 60%- Executed 50%- Executed less
supervisory E 100% of the 79% of the 69% of the 59% of the than 50% of the
session and supervisory plan supervisory plan supervisory plan supervisory plan supervisory plan
observation of
teachers
Submit monthly Submit monthly Submit monthly Submit monthly
Submit monthly instructional instructional instructional instructional
instructional supervisory plan supervisory plan supervisory plan supervisory plan
2.3. Prepared T supervisory plan and and and and
and and accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
implemented accomplishment report with 10 report with 15 report with 20 report with 25
an report on time. working days working days working days working days
Instructonal delay. delay. delay. delay.
tructonal Leadreship (20%)

supervisory
plan using
appropriate
y Basic Educaton

strategies
2.3. Prepared
and
implemented
an
Instructonal

2. Instructonal Leadreship (20%)


supervisory
plan using
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton appropriate Consistently Frequently Occasionally
strategies Rarely evaluated
evaluated evaluated evaluated
DLLs/DLPs, No acceptable
Q DLLs/DLPs, DLLs/DLPs, DLLs/DLPs,
classroom and evidence was
classroom and classroom and classroom and
learning shown
learning learning learning
environment.
environment. environment. environment.

2.3.2. Evaluated
DLLs/DLPs February- Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
classroom and 8% No acceptable
combination of at combination of at combination of at Submitted 1
learning April 2018 E
least 4 of the least 3 of the least 4 of the acceptable MOV
evidence was
environment shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable
T were distributed were distributed wereacross
distributed
2
were completed evidence was
across 4 quarters. across 3 quarters. in 1 quarter only. shown
quarters.

9 or more
7-8 teachers/staff 5-6 teachers/staff 3-4 teachers/staff 1-2 teachers/staff
2.4. Provide Q teachers/staff
mentored/coache
mentored/coache mentored/coache mentored/coache mentored/coache
d provided TA d provided TA. d provided TA. d provided TA.
expert d provided TA
technical
assistance
and Spent 100% of Exceeded 10% of Exceeded 20% of Exceeded 30% of Exceeded 40% of
instructonal E approved budget the alloted the alloted the alloted the alloted
support to for training budget budget budget budget
teachers
through post
conference, 80-90 percent of 70% to 80% 50% to 60% 40% to 30% less than 20% of
meetng and teachers/staff teachers/staff teachers/staff teachers/staff teachers/staff
or coaching T mentored/coache mentored/coache mentored/coache mentored/coache mentored/coache
d provided TA d provided TA d provided TA d provided TA d provided TA
monthly monthly. monthly monthly monthly.

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T
100% of 90% of 80% of 70% of 60% and below
classrooms were classrooms were classrooms were classrooms were of classrooms
Q structured structured structured structured were structured
according to according to according to according to according to
requirement. requirement. requirement. requirement. requirement.
3.1.1. Managed
and supervised
3.1. Created proper structuring 100% of 90% of 80% of 70% of
an engaging of classrooms and February- classroom classroom classroom classroom
learning offices and April 2018 E structured were structured were structured were structured were No evidence of
environment maintained overall maintained until maintained until maintained until maintained until maintenance.
makeup of the the end of SY the end of SY the end of SY the end of SY
school 2018-2019 2018-2019 2018-2019 2018-2019

Implemented at Implemented 5 to Implemented 4 Implemented 2 to Implemented 1


Q least 7 programs 6 programs and programs and
and projects in projects in the projects in the
3 programs and program and
projects in the project in the
the school school school school school

3.2.1 Presented at least Presented at least


Presented at least Presented only 1
3.2. Created a Implemented 4 acceptable 3 acceptable
2 acceptable acceptable
safe, orderly, the following: MOVs as MOVs as
MOVs as MOVs as No acceptable
nurturing, *NDEP *SBFP E evidence of evidence of
evidence of evidence of MOVs presented.
proper proper
and healthy *DRRM *WINS implementation implementation
implementation implementation
environment *CPC *CFSS of the program. of the program.
of the program. of the program.
*IPED *NGP

Submit Submit Submit Submit


7% Submit accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
tered Learning Environment (20%)

T accomplishment report 10 report 15 report 20 report on time 25


report on time. working days working days working days working days
delay. delay. delay. delay
ry of Quality Basic Educaton
7%

3. A Child-Centered Learning Environment (20%)


Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid
ed and ed and ed and ed and ed and
implemented 7 of implemented 5-6 implemented 4 of implemented 2-3 implemented 1 of
Q the pupils of the pupils the pupils of the pupils the pupils
programs & programs & programs & programs & programs &
activities activities activities activities activities
3.3.1. Organized,
provided and
3.3. Support implemented
Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid Organized,provid
learner's the nfollowing ed and ed and ed and ed and ed and
desire to pupil/students implemented 7 of implemented 5 to implemented 4 of implemented 2 to implemented 1 of
pursue program the pupils 6 of the pupils the pupils 3 of the pupils the pupils
further activities (with E programs & programs & programs & programs & programs &
learning and work and activities with activities with activities with activities with activities with
managed implementation work and work and work and work and work and
behavior plan): implementation implementation implementation implementation implementation
within the SGP/SSG/SPG, plan plan plan plan plan
school and Campus
during other journalism,
school- Student interest,
related clubs, student
actvites organization,
done outside youth Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted Submitted pupil's
the school development pupil's programs pupil's programs pupil's programs pupil's programs programs and
progras, scouting and activities and activities and activities and activities activities
T
and sports accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment accomplishment
report on March report on April report on May report on June report on July
2019 2019 2019 2019 2019

Recognized at Recognized at Recognized at Recognized at Recognized at

3.4. Q least 9-10


deserving
least 7-8
deserving
least 5-6
deserving
least 3-4
deserving
least 1-2
deserving
Recognized stakeholders. stakeholders. stakeholders. stakeholders. stakeholders.
high
peforming 3.4.1. Conducted February-
learners, recognition rites 7%
teachers, for stakeholders April 2018
supportve
parents and
stakeholders
3.4.
Recognized
high
peforming 3.4.1. Conducted February-
learners, recognition rites 7%
teachers, for stakeholders April 2018
supportve Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
parents and least 4 MOV for least 3 MOV for least 2 MOV for least 1 MOV for
stakeholders E each stakeholder each stakeholder each stakeholder each stakeholder
no evidence
to be awarded to be awarded to be awarded to be awarded

T
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely conduct


Q conduct of LAC conduct of LAC conduct of LAC of LAC on no evidence
on schedule date. on schedule date. on schedule date. schedule date.
4.1. Created a
community
of learnres February- Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at
6%
through the April 2018 E least 4 MOV for least 3 MOV for least 2 MOV for least 1 MOV for
no evidence
conduct of each LAC each LAC each LAC each LAC
LAC sessions session held. session held. session held. session held.

T Conducted LAC 1-2 LAC session 3-4 LAC session 5-6 LAC session 7 or more LAC
session monthly missed. missed missed session missed.

Conducted Conducted
Conducted Conducted
targeted number targeted number Conducted 1
targeted number targeted number
of INSET with of INSET INSET without
of INSET with of INSET
training proposal without training training proposal
Q training proposal
but did not proposal but
without training
and
and proposal and
submitted submitted accomplishment
4.2. accomplishment accomplishment
accomplishment accomplishment report
report report
Mentored report report
and coached
teachers and
staff and
facilitated
inducton of
new ones
4.2.
Mentored
and coached
teachers and
staff and
facilitated Conducted Exceeded 10% of Exceeded 20% of Exceeded 30% of Exceeded 40% of
inducton of E INSET within the the alloted the alloted the alloted the alloted
new ones alloted budget budget budget budget budget

Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted


Conducted
INSET with 5 INSET with 10 INSET with 15 INSET with 20
T INSET as
working days working days working days working days
scheduled
delay delay delay delay

Q
4.3.
Prepared,
implemented
and
monitored E
school-based
INSET for all
teaching and
non-teaching
staff based
on individual
development teachers
plan and developed minimized
development T more quality tardiness of
n Resource Management and Development (20%)

need analysis time with teachers


learners
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton
4. Human Resource Management and Development (20
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton
Teachers and Teachers and Teachers and
Teachers and
other personnel other personnel other personnel
other personnel
assigned assigned assigned
assigned rarely
consistently frquently occasionally
performed No acceptable
performed performed performed
Q special tasks special tasks special tasks
special tasks evidence was
and/or shown
and/or and/or and/or
4.4.1. Assigned assignments as assignments as assignments as
assignments as
teachers and shown in the shown in the shown in the
shown in the
other personnel MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
to their areas of
competence and
monitored their
performance Submitted at Submitted at
Submitted at No acceptable
least 4 different least 3 different Submitted only 1
E kinds of kinds of
only 2 different
acceptable MOV
evidence was
kinds of MOV shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

T
February- 7%
April 2018
29% and below
90%- 100% of 70%- 89% of 50%- 69% of 30%- 49% of
of the teachers
Q teachers were teachers were teachers were teachers were
were sent to
sent to trainings sent to trainings sent to trainings sent to trainings
trainings.

4.4.2. Sent Spent 100% of Expenditure for Expenditure for Expenditure for Expenditure for
teachers and E approved budget training exceeded training exceeded training exceeded training exceeded
4.4. staff to for training 20% 30% 40% 50%
Recognized trainings/semina
potental of rs/conference/w
teachers orkshops (All)
All teachers have All teachers have All teachers have All teachers have All teachers have
and/or staff attended attended attended attended attended
and provided trainings/seminar trainings/seminar trainings/seminar trainings/seminar trainings/seminar
opportunites T s/conferences/wo s/conferences/wo s/conferences/wo s/conferences/wo s/conferences/wo
for rkshop by rkshop by rkshop by rkshop within a rkshop within a
professional October. December. January 2019. year. year.
development
and provided
opportunites
for
professional
development

Consistently Occasionally
Frequently acted Rarely acted on
acted on papers acted on papers
on papers such as papers such as
such as such as
appointments and appointments and
appointments and appointments and
promotions of promotions of
promotions of promotions of
teachers on the teachers on the No acceptable
teachers on the teachers on the
Q basis of merit
basis of merit
basis of merit
basis of merit evidence was
and needs in the and needs in the shown
and needs in the and needs in the
interest of interest of
interest of interest of
service as shown service as shown
service as shown service as shown
4.4.3. Endorsed in the MOV in the MOV
in the MOV in the MOV
presented. presented.
appoinments presented. presented.
and promotions
of teachers on
the bases of
merit and needs
in the interest of 100%-80% of the 50%-79% of the 20%-49% of the 10% -19% of the less than 10% of
the service acted papers acted papers acted papers acted papers the acted papers
E produced good produced good produced good produced good produced good
results results results results results

Act on papers Act on papers Act on papers Act on papers Act on papers
received within 3 receivedwithin 4- received within within 11-14 within 15 or
working days 5 days upon 6-10 working working days more working
T upon recipt as recipt as shown days upon recipt upon recipt as days upon recipt
shown in the in the MOV as shown in the shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted. submitted. MOV submitted. MOV submitted. MOV submitted.

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

Q 7 sectors 5-6 sectors 3-4 sectors 2 sectors 1 sector


represented represented represented represented represented
5.1. 5.1.1.
Organized Implemented
Submitted at Submitted at Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
programs programs of: 1. E least 4 of the least 3 of the of the MOV of the MOV evidence was
that involve Brigada Eskwela MOV given. MOV given. given. given. shown.
parents and 2. Homeroom
other PTA 3. General
stakeholders PTA 4. Faculty
to promote and staff
learning association
5.1. 5.1.1.
Organized Implemented
programs programs of: 1.
that involve Brigada Eskwela
parents and 2. Homeroom
other PTA 3. General Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV
Quality Basic stakeholders PTA 4. Faculty were distributed were distributed were done during were done for
Delivery of

Educaton to promote and staff across 4 quartes across 4 quartes 2 quartes only 1 quarter. No acceptable
learning association T evidence was
shown.

Consistently Frequently Occasionaly Rarely conducted No acceptable


conducted and conducted and conducted and and worked with evidence was
worked with worked with worked with LGU, line shown
LGU, line LGU, line LGU, line agencies and
agencies and agencies and agencies and other national
other national other national other national government
government government government agencies on
agencies on agencies on agencies on implementation
Q implementation implementation implementation of different
of different of different of different programs and
programs and programs and programs and projects
projects projects projects supported by
5.2.1. supported by supported by supported by acceptable
Coordinated and acceptable acceptable acceptable MOVs
worked with MOVs MOVs MOVs
LGU, Line
agencies and
other national
government Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No acceptable
agencies on least 4 least 3 least 2 least 1 evidence was
implementation coordination and coordination and coordination and coordination and shown
of different evidence of evidence of evidence of evidence of
working with working with working with working with
programs and LGU, line LGU, line LGU, line LGU, line
projects agencies, and agencies, and agencies, and agencies, and
E other national other national other national other national
government government government government
agencies as agencies as agencies as agencies as
shown by the shown by the shown by the shown by the
MOVs MOVs MOVs MOVs
submitted. submitted. submitted. submitted.

5.2. T
Conducted
dialogues,
meetngs, for
ty Partnership (10%)

May-18 5%
a and
stablished
linkages with
mult-
stakeholders
in crafting
and
5.2.
Conducted Crafted and Crafted and Crafted and Crafted and
dialogues, established established established established
meetngs, for

5. Parents' involvement and community Partnership (10%)


May-18 5% functional MOA, functional MOA, functional MOA, functional MOA,
a and MOU, ASP MOU, ASP MOU, ASP MOU, ASP
stablished policies with policies with policies with policies with
linkages with stakeholders as stakeholders as stakeholders as stakeholders as No acceptable
mult- Q shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the evidence was
stakeholders MOV presented MOV presented MOV presented MOV presented shown.
in crafting with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
and 5.2.2. Crafted
implementn and stablished
g programs with
and projects stakeholders Presented at least Presented at least Presented at Presented only 1
MOA, MOU, ASP 4 MOA, MUO, 3 MOA, MUO, least24 MOA, MOA, MUO,
based on its ASP policies ASP policies MUO, ASP ASP policy with
policies with stakeholders with stakeholders policies with stakeholders No acceptable
E supported by any supported by any stakeholders supported by any evidence was
acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. supported by any acceptable MOV. shown.
acceptable MOV.

Organized a Organized a Organized a Organized only Organized only


functional: ETF, functional: ETF, functional: ETF, SGC & PT with SGC & PT but
SGC & PT with SGC & PT with SGC & PT but incomplete have no
complete incomplete have no supporting supporting
Q supporting supporting supporting documents documents
documents documents documents

5.2.3. Organized
a funtional: Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
Educational Task combination of at combination of at combination of at combination of at No acceptable
Force, School E least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the least 4 of the evidence was
Governing acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. shown.
Council and
Project Teams
Organized a Organized a Organized a Organized a Organized a
functional: ETF, functional: ETF, functional: ETF, functional: ETF, functional: ETF,
SGC & PT SGC & PT in SGC & PT in SGC & PT in SGC & PT in
T before August, September, 2018 October, 2018 November, 2018 December, 2018
2018
Conducted Conducted 3 Conducted 2 Conducted 1 Conducted at
quarterly General times General times General times General least 2 times
PTA Assembly PTA Assembly PTA Assembly PTA Assembly homeroom PTA
Q within the school within the school within the school meeting within
year year year the school year
5.3
Promoted the
image of the Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted 3
school General PTA General PTA General PTA quarterly General times & below
through: Assembly with Assembly with 2 Assembly with PTA Assembly General PTA
1. School complete documents/ only 1 document/ but have no Assembly but
documents MOV's MOV presented. documents/ have no
Summit May-18 5% E (minutes, presented. MOV's documents/
2. SOSA 3. attendance sheets presented. MOV's
Cultural Show & notice of presented.
4. meeting)
Project
exhibits and
fairs Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted Conducted
General PTA General PTA General PTA General PTA General PTA
Assembly as Assembly 10 Assembly 15 Assembly 20 Assembly 25
T scheduled. working days working days working days working days
delay. delay. delay. delay.

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING E


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA ACCOMPLISHMEN
5 4 3 2 1 T

5 and below
Q 12 MOOE
liquidated
10-11 MOOE
liquidated
8-9 MOOE
liquidated
6-7 MOOE
liquidated
MOOE
liquidated

6.1: Managed
5 and below
school 12 MOOE 10-11 MOOE 8-9 MOOE 6-7 MOOE
MOOE
resources in E liquidated liquidated liquidated liquidated
liquidated
accordance without without without without
without
February- correction correction correction correction
with DepEd 10%
nd Management Operatons (20%)

April 2018 correction


policies and
auditing rules
(liquidation
report)
Quality Basic Educaton
school
resources in
accordance February-
with DepEd 10%

School Leadership and Management Operatons (20%)


April 2018
policies and
auditing rules
(liquidation
report) 12 MOOE 8-11 MOOE 5-7 MOOE 3-4 MOOE 1-2 MOOE
T liquidated on
Delivery of Quality Basic Educaton

liquidated on liquidated on liquidated on liquidated on


time time time time time

75%-100% of 61%-74%% of 55%-60% of 50%-54%% of Less than 50%


of
Q expenditures expenditures expenditures expenditures expenditures
conformed conformed conformed conformed conformed
with the APP with the APP with the APP with the APP with the APP

Maintained
financial February- 10% Necessary
management April 2018
in the school office Necessary
supplies, office Necessary Necessary Necessary
repairs and supplies,
E maintenance repairs and office supplies repairs were maintenances
were funded maintenance were funded funded were funded
and were funded
accomplished

T
100% OVERALL RATING ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADOR R. BALLADA GEORGANN G. CARIASO, CESE EDUARDO C. ESCOR


Head Teacher l-TIC Officer - in - Charge Officer - in - Charg
Ratee Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Office of the Schools Division
Rater Approving Author
ORGANN G. CARIASO, CESE
tant Schools Division Superintendent

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
Q T E AVE.
EDUARDO C. ESCORPISO JR.
Officer - in - Charge
e of the Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region 02
Schools Division of Batanes
BASCO CENTRAL SCHOOL
Basco
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee : OLIVA FARA V. MALAYAO Name of Rater:
Position : Teacher III Position:
Rating Period :SY 2019 - 2020 Date of Review:
Division : Batanes

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

1. Applied knowledge of content 0.075


within and across curriculum
Showed knowledge of content
teaching areas. and its integration within and
Submitted at least 4 lessons
using MOV 1 and supported
5 across subject areas as
by any 1 of the other given
shown inMOV1witha rating of
MOV
7

Showed knowledge of content


and its integration within and Submitted 3 lessons using
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020

4 across subject areas as MOV 1 and supported by any


shown inMOV1witha rating of 1 of the other given MOV
6
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 202
Showed knowledge of content
and its integration within and Submitted 2 lessons using
3 across subject areas as MOV 1 and supported by any
shown in MOV 1 with a rating 1 of the other given MOV
of 5

Showed knowledge of content Submitted any 1 of rthe given


2
and its integration within and MOV

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown
2. Used a range of teaching strategies
that enhance learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills. Facilitated using different
Showed knowledge of content
teaching strategies that
and its integration within and
promote reading, writing
5 across subject areas as
and/or numeracy skills as
shown inMOV1witha rating of
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
7
of 7

Facilitated using different


Showed knowledge of content
teaching strategies that
and its integration within and
promote reading, writing
4 across subject areas as
and/or numeracy skills as
shown inMOV1witha rating of
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
6
of 6
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020
1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
Basic Education Services

0.075
Facilitated using different
Showed knowledge of content
teaching strategies that
and its integration within and
promote reading, writing
3 across subject areas as
and/or numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
of 5
of 5
JUN
Basic Education

1. Content Knowledge
Facilitated using different
Showed knowledge of content
teaching strategies that
and its integration within and
promote
across subject
2 reading, writing
areas as shown in MOV 1 with
and/or numeracy skills as
a
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
rating of 4
of 4

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown
3. Applied a range of teaching
strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as other Used different teaching
higher- order thinking skills. Submitted at least 4 lessons
strategies that develop critical
as evidenced by MOV 1 and
5 and creative thinking and/or
supported by any1ofthe other
other HOTS as shown in MOV
given MOV
1 with a rating of 7

Used different teaching


Submitted 3 lessons as
strategies that develop critical
evidenced by MOV 1 and
4 and creative thinking and/or
supported by any1 of the
other HOTS as shown in MOV
other given MOV
1 with a rating of 6
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020

0.075 Used different teaching


Submitted 2 lessons as
strategies that develop critical
evidenced by MOV 1 and
3 and creative thinking and/or
supported by any 1of the
other HOTS as shown in MOV
other given MOV
1 with a rating of 5
JUNE 2
Used different teaching
strategies that develop critical
and creative Submitted 2 lessons as
thinking and/or evidenced by MOV 1 and
2
other HOTS as supported by any 1of the
shown in MOV other given MOV
1 with a rating
of 4

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS
4. Managed classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in
groups, in meaningful exploration, Used classroom management
discovery and hands-on activities Submitted at least 4 lessons
strategies that engage
within a range of physical learning supported by MOV 1 and any
5 learners in activities/tasks as
environments. 1 of the other acceptable
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
MOV
of 7

Used classroom management


Submitted 3 lessons
strategies that engage
supported by MOV 1 and any
4 learners in activities/tasks as
1 of the other acceptable
shown in MOV1witha rating of
MOV
6
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020

7.50%
JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020
7.50%
Used classroom management
Submitted 2 lessons as
strategies that engage
evidenced by MOV 1 and
3 learners in activities/tasks as
supported by any 1of the
shown in MOV 1 with a rating
other given MOV
of 5

Used classroom management


strategies that engage
Submitted 1
learners in
lesson supported by any of
2 activities/tasks
the acceptable
as shown in
MOV
MOV 1with a
rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown
5. Managed learner behavior
constructively by applying positive and
non-violent discipline to ensure
learning- focused environments. Applied teacher management
strategies of learner behavior
Submitted at least 4 of the
that promote positive and
5 given strategies as observed
non-violent discipline as
in at least 4 lessons
shown in MOV submitted with
a rating of 7

Used classroom management


strategies that engage
learners in activities/tasks as
shown in MOV1 with a rating Submitted at least 4 of the
4 of 6 given strategies as observed
in 3 lessons
and Diversity of Learners

NE 2019 -APRIL 2020


tion Services

7.50%
2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners

JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020


Basic Education Services
7.50% Applied teacher management
strategies of learner behavior
Submitted at least 4 of the
that promote positive and
3 given strategies as observed
non-violent discipline as
in 2 lessons
shown in MOV submitted with
a rating of 5

Applied teacher management


strategies of learner behavior
that promote
positive and
non-violent
discipline as Submitted any 1
2 shown in MOV of the given strategies as
submitted with a observed in only 1 lesson
rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown
6. Used differentiated,
developmentally appropriate learning
experiences to address learners’
gender, needs, strengths, interests Submitted at least 4
and experiences. Applied differentiated teaching differentiated teaching
strategies to address learner strategies in at least 2 lessons
5
diversity as shown in MOV 1 as evidenced by MOV 1 and
with a rating of 7 supported by any 1 of the
other acceptable MOV
RIL 2020
Submitted 3 differentiated
Applied differentiated teaching teaching strategies in at least
strategies to address learner 2 lessons as evidenced by
4
diversity as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 and supported by
with a rating of 6 any1ofthe other acceptable
MOV

JUNE 2019 -APRIL 2020


7.50% Submitted 2 differentiated
Applied differentiated teaching
teaching strategies in 2
strategies to address learner
3 lessons as evidenced by MOV
diversity as shown in MOV 1
1 and supported by any1ofthe
with a rating of 5
other acceptable MOV

Submitted any 1 at least 4


Applied differentiated teaching lessons as observed in 3
strategies to address learner lessons as observed in 2
diversity as lessons observed in only 1
2
shown in MOV lesson differentiated teaching
1 with a rating strategy in only 1 lesson as
of 4 evidently shown in any 1 of
the acceptable MOV

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA
QUALITY EFICIENCY TIMELINESS
Submitted at least 4
Planned and implemented
developmentally sequenced
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process
5 teaching and learning process
as evidently shown in MOV 1
as shown in MOV 1 with a
and supported by any 1 of the
rating of 7
other given MOV

Submitted 3 developmentally
Planned and implemented
sequenced teaching and
developmentally sequenced
learning process as evidently
4 teaching and learning process
shown in MOV 1 and
as shown in MOV 1 with a
supported by any 1 of the
rating of 6
other given MOV

JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020


7. Planned, managed and
implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning
7.50%
processes to meet curriculum Submitted 2 developmentally
requirements and varied teaching Planned and implemented
sequenced teaching and
contexts. developmentally sequenced
learning process as evidently
3 teaching and learning process
shown in MOV 1 and
as shown in MOV 1 with a
supported by any 1 of the
rating of 5
other given MOV

Planned and implemented


developmentally sequenced
Submitted 1 developmentally
teaching and
2 sequenced teaching and
learning
learning
process as shown in MOV 1
process as
with a rating of 4
evidently shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV
No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was
1
shown shown

Consistently participated in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to Participated in at least 4
discuss teacher/learner LACs/FGDs/ meetings as
5
feedback to enrich instruction evidently shown in any 1 of
as shown in the MOV the given MOV
submitted

Frequently participated in
LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/
discuss teacher/learner
4 meetings as evidently shown
3. Curriculum and Planning

feedback to enrich instruction


in any 1 of the given MOV
as shown in the MOV
submitted
Basic Education Services

JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020

8. Participated in collegial discussions


that use teacher and learner feedback 7.50% Occasionally participated in
to enrich teaching practice. LACs/FGDs/ meetings to
Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/
discuss teacher/learner
3 meetings as evidently shown
feedback to enrich instruction
in any 1 of the given MOV
as shown in the MOV
submitted
JU
3. C
Rarely participated in
LAC/FGD/ meeting to discuss
teacher/learner
feedback to Participated in 1 LAC/FGD/ in
2
enrich any 1 of the given MOV
instruction as
shown in the
MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

Developed and used varied Submitted at least 4 varied


teaching and learning teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, as
5
address learning goals as evidently shown in MOV 1 and
shown in MOV1witha rating of supported by any 1 of the
7 acceptable MOV

Developed and used varied Submitted 3 varied teaching


teaching and learning and learning resources,
resources, including ICT, to including ICT, as evidently
4
address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 and
shown in MOV1witha rating of supported by any 1 of the
6 acceptable MOV
JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020

9. Selected, developed, organized and


used appropriate teaching and
7.50% Developed and used varied Submitted 2 varied teaching
learning resources, including ICT, to
teaching and learning and learning resources,
address learning goals.
resources, including ICT, to including ICT, as evidently
3
address learning goals as shown in MOV 1 and
shown in MOV 1 with a rating supported by any 1 of the
of 5 acceptable MOV
JUNE
Developed and
used varied teaching and Submitted any teaching and
learning resources, learning resource, including
including ICT, to ICT,
2 address as evidently
learning goals shown in any of
as shown in the acceptable
MOV 1 with a MOV
rating of 4

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Designed, selected, organized


and used diagnostic,
Submitted at least 4 varied
formative and summative
assessment tools as evidently
5 assessment strategies
shown inany1ofthe acceptable
consistent with curriculum
MOV
requirements as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 7

Designed, selected, organized


and used diagnostic,
Submitted 3 varied
formative and summative
assessment tools as evidently
4 assessment strategies
shown inany1ofthe acceptable
consistent with curriculum
MOV
requirements as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 6
UNE 2019-APRIL 2020

10. Designed, selected, organized and


used diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies 7.50%
consistent with curriculum
requirements.
JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020
10. Designed, selected, organized and
used diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment strategies 7.50%
consistent with curriculum
Designed, selected, organized
requirements.
and used diagnostic, Occasionally monitored and
formative and summative evaluated learner progress
3 assessment strategies and achievement using
consistent with curriculum learner attainment data as
requirements as shown in shown in the MOV submitted
MOV 1 with a rating of 5

Rarely monitored and


Designed, selected, organized
evaluated learner progress
and used diagnostic,
and
formative and summative
achievement
2 assessment strategies
using learner
consistent with curriculum
attainment data
requirements as shown in
as shown in the
MOV 1 with a rating of 4
MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

Consistently monitored and


evaluated learner progress Submitted a combination of at
Submitted MOV were
5 and achievement using least 4 of the acceptable MOV
distributed across 4 quarters
learner attainment data as
shown in the MOV submitted
20
Frequently monitored and
evaluated learner progress
Submitted a combination of 3 Submitted MOV were
4 and achievement using
of the acceptable MOV distributed across 3 quarters
learner attainment data as
shown in the MOV submitted

JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020


11. Monitored and evaluated learner
progress and achievement using 7.50%
4. Assessment and Reporting

learner attainment data. Occasionally monitored and


evaluated learner progress
Submitted a combination of 2 Submitted MOV were
3 and achievement using
of the acceptable MOV distributed across 2 quarters
learner attainment data as
shown in the MOV submitted

Rarely monitored and


evaluated learner progress
and
achievement Submitted a combination of 1 Submitted any 1 of the given
2
using learner of the acceptable MOV MOV
attainment data
as shown in the
MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown shown
Consistently showed prompt
and clear communication of
the learners’ needs, progress
Submitted a combination of at Submitted MOV were
5 and achievement to key
least 4 of the acceptable MOV distributed across 4 quarters
stakeholders, including
parents/ guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted

Frequently showed prompt


and clear communication of
the learners’ needs, progress
Submitted a combination of at Submitted MOV were
4 and achievement to key
least 3 of the acceptable MOV distributed across 3 quarters
stakeholders, including
parents/ guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted
JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020
Basic Education Services

12. Communicated promptly and


clearly the learners’ needs, progress
and achievement to key stakeholders, Occasionally showed prompt
including parents/guardians. and clear communication of
the learners’ needs, progress
Submitted a combination of at Submitted MOV were
3 and achievement to key
least 2 of the acceptable MOV distributed across 2 quarters
stakeholders, including
parents/ guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted
Rarely showed
prompt and clear
communication of the
learners’
needs, progress
and
achievement to Submitted any 1 Submitted any 1
2
key of the given MOV of the given MOV
stakeholders,
including
parents/
guardians as
shown in the
MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown shown

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WT. /KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS

Consistently performed
various related work/activities
Submitted at least 4 different
5 that contribute to the teaching
kinds of acceptable MOV
learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted
9-APRIL 2020
cation Services

s Factor

13. Performed various related


works/activities that contribute to the
10%
teaching-learning process.
Frequently performed various
related work/activities that
Submitted at least 3 different
4 contribute to the teaching
kinds of acceptable MOV
learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted

JUNE 2019-APRIL 2020


Basic Education Services

5. Plus Factor

13. Performed various related


works/activities that contribute to the
10%
teaching-learning process.
Occasionally performed
various related work/activities
Submitted at least 2 different
3 that contribute to the teaching
kinds of acceptable MOV
learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted

Rarely performed various


related work/activities that
Submitted at least 1 of
2 contribute to the teaching
acceptable MOV
learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted

No acceptable evidence was No acceptable evidence was


1
shown shown

100% OVERALL RATING ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING

ADJECTIVAL RATING EVIDENCES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

JULIA E. VARGAS OLIVA FARA V. MALAYAO


Rater Ratee
EW FORM (IPCRF)
JULIA E. VARGAS
Master Teacher II

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


ACTUAL RESULT
ACTUAL
SCORE
ACCOMPLISHMENT Q E T AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
ACCOMPLISHMENT Q E T AVE.
5 4
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
ACCOMPLISHMENT Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
ACCOMPLISHMENT Q T E AVE.
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
ACTUAL ACTUAL RESULT
SCORE
ACCOMPLISHMENT Q T E AVE.
OMPLISHMENTS

RATING
BERNADETTE L. VINALAY
EPS 1-Pre School

You might also like