Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 8a
Introduction
Immediately after and during the first days after a strong earthquake occurs, hundreds of
buildings may be damaged. Local government units and other national government agencies in
charge of building safety assessment might be swamped by the task of building safety evaluation.
Even with an influx of volunteers, there is normally much work that must be completed within a
short period of time. Subsequent strong aftershocks usually follow the main shock and affected
buildings might suffer much severe damage. It is therefore necessary to carry out as quickly as
possible and within a short period of time the evaluation of building safety in order to identify
which buildings are safe for immediate use or safe for entry. Moreover, widespread damage may
be expected and expert engineers may be insufficient to undertake all building safety evaluations
within a limited timeframe. The procedure for rapid building safety evaluation would therefore be
the more appropriate procedure that take into account this post earthquake incident.
A three level procedure for post-earthquake safety evaluation was developed by the
Applied Technology Council (ATC-20). This procedure, used since the first ASEP Disaster Quick
Reaction Survey Teams (DQRST), will still be the same procedure recognized by the ASEP DMPR
as appropriate for damage assessment of buildings after a damaging earthquake event. The Three
level procedure are shown in the flowchart of normal building safety evaluation and posting
process as follows:
- Duration of occupancy
- Areas of occupancy
- Usage
• Covers broad range of damage
• Cladding damage may result in further damage
• Interior finish or ceiling damage may lead to falling
hazards or air quality issues
• Possible presence of other risks (toxic materials release,
etc.)
• Portion of the building cannot be safely occupied
• Safety issues can only be resolved by removal of
architectural elements or by an Engineering Evaluation
• Falling, collapse, or other hazard
OFF-LIMITS Red
• Does not necessarily indicate that demolition is required
• No entry permitted, except by authorities
• Obvious safety risks are present
• Structure is believed to be is danger of collapse from
static conditions, subsequent events, or addition of
occupant loads
• Another dangerous condition is present
1. Rapid Evaluation Procedure. The objective of Rapid Evaluation is to quickly, and with
minimum of manpower, inspect and evaluate building in the damage area. This procedure
is designed to be used to quickly post the apparent safe (INSPECTED posting) and the
obviously unsafe structures (OFF LIMITS posting). Those structures that have totally or
selected areas with questionable strength and safety are designated for the interim
RESTRICTED USE, meaning entry is restricted in the entire area or in selected areas with
questionable safety requirements. Once all buildings in a given area have been inspected
and those that are apparently safe or obviously unsafe have been posted, the remaining
structures, the so called gray-area buildings, are left for a Detailed Evaluation by a
structural engineer. This is the second level procedure which is generally performed within
a few hours to a few days after the Rapid Evaluation.
Rapid Evaluation procedure begins with the reconnaissance of a damage area. The
general level of damage or lack of damage should be noted because this is often an
important clue to the likelihood of finding damage and to its severity. When a building is
selected for evaluation, Rapid evaluation is done by first examining the outside of the
structure. The inspector should walk around the entire structure, if this is possible.
Ordinarily, only the exterior of the building is inspected at this time, unless there is a
suspected or reported problem. This is done primarily to maximize the number of
inspections in the immediate post event period. If the building is clearly in an unsafe
condition, it should not be entered.
Each building is evaluated using the six Basic Rapid Evaluation criteria presented in
Table 1. These are used to rate the building’s condition with respect to safety of occupants
and the public. The six criteria selected for the Rapid Evaluation process were chosen for
being externally observable conditions or items of damage that, individually or collectively,
are sufficient to warrant use of the OFF-LIMITS or, in case of falling or other hazards, the
AREA OFF LIMITS posting categories. Because the Rapid Evaluation process is designed to
conserve anticipated limited manpower resources, the damage assessments are
necessarily coarse. Inspectors are to look for readily observable, gross kinds of structural
distress, such as partial collapse, leaning buildings, and partial chimney collapse. In
addition, geotechnical conditions such as slope movement that threaten building safety
are grounds for posting a structure as OFF LIMIT.
Buildings that are apparently safe are to be posted Inspected, and the INSPECTED
placard is to be marked to indicate whether this inspection was “exterior” only or “exterior
and interior”. Generally, an initial Rapid Evaluation will be only of the exterior for reasons
discussed above. If the occupants report a problem, or if the building cannot be adequately
viewed from the outside or if a problem is suspected, the interior should also be inspected.
Unsafe buildings must be posted as soon as possible with the OFF-LIMIT placard
and the occupants informed that they must leave the premises immediately.
Because many structures will not fall easily into either INSPECTED (i.e., apparently
safe) or OFF-LIMIT classification, the third posting classification, RESTRICTED USE, will also
have to be used. This is to be used when the level of safety concern is doubtful and the
structure’s condition is neither apparently safe nor obviously unsafe. RESTRICTED USE
placard are to be placed at each entrance, and the occupants informed of the significance
of the damage. A structure designated RESTRICTED USE must be given a subsequent
Detailed Evaluation and this requirement is indicated by the inspector on the Rapid
Evaluation form.
2. Examine the ground in the general area of the structure foe fissures, bulged ground,
signs of slope movement, or signs of liquefaction.
3. Ordinarily enter a building only when the structure cannot be viewed sufficiently from
the outside or when there is suspected, or reported, problem such as gross nonstructural
distress (e.g. fallen ceiling or badly damaged partitions visible from the outside.) Do not
enter obviously unsafe structure.
4. Evaluate the structure or area using the six criteria (Table 1), and complete the Rapid
Evaluation Form. Doubtful buildings should be slated for Detailed Evaluation. Make sure
exitways are clear.
5. Post the structure according to the result of the evaluation. Use one of the three
placards: INSPECTED, RESTRICTED USE, or OFF LIMITS. When posting INSPECTED, check
the appropriate box to indicate whether only the “exterior” or the “exterior and interior”
was inspected. Post every entrance to a building classified OFF LIMITS or RESTRICTED
USE.
OFF-LIMITS
2. Building or any story is significantly out-of-plumb.
OFF-LIMITS
3. Obvious severe damage to primary structural members, severe racking of walls, or other
signs of severe distress present.
OFF-LIMITS
4. Obvious parapet, chimney, or other falling hazards present
OFF-LIMITS
OFF-LIMITS
6. Other hazards present (e.g. Toxic spill, asbestos contamination, broken gas line, fallen
power line).
1995 Kobe EQ
References.
2. Applied Technology Council (1995). Rapid Safety Assessment Form (ATC 20)
2. Vidal F., Feriche, and M., Ontoveros, A., (2009). Basic Techniques for Quick and Rapid Post-
Earthquake Assessments of Building Safety, 8th Conference Workshop on Seismic Microzoning
and Risk Reduction, Spain