MGU-DD-TX-0001 - Soil Investigation Report - AA PDF

SWEET DREAMS PROJECT
SOIL INVESTIGATION
Report

A 2019-02-24 issued for review MGU MGU MLM MLM
REV. DATE STATUS SURVEYED BY PREPARED BY CHECKED BY VALIDATED BY
REVISION CODE: A, B, C... = proposed for review — 0, 1, 2... = official versions — T = continuous review — Z, Y, X... as-built
STATUS: issued for information — issued for review — issued for approval — issued for use — issued for final dossier
This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

No part may be used, reproduced or transmitted without the written permission of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.
VALRHONA CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE
Contract #:
Summary: This procedure describes the specific working methods
and templates which will be used to carry out the document controlling
system in this project.
MGU-DD-TX-0001-A 14 Pages
MGU-DD-TX-0001-A_Soil Investigation Report
2 of 14
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES
REVISION LOCATION OF CHANGE / SECTION / PAGE AFFECTED DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE
A N/A First Issue


No part may be used, reproduced or transmitted without the written permission of PT. Valrhona
3 of 14
CONTENTS
01 PURPOSE 4
02 GENERAL 4
03 RESPONSIBILITIES 4
04 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 4
05 REFERENCES 4
06 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 5
07 GEOHAZARD 5
07.1 SEISMIC 5
07.2 LIQUEFACTION AND SEISMIC SETTLEMENT 6
08 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 6
08.1 SCOPE OF WORK 6
08.2 DRILLING 7
08.3 INSITU TESTING (STANDARD PENETRATION TEST) 8
08.4 SOIL SAMPLING 8
08.5 CONE PENETRATION TEST 8
08.6 LABORATORY TESTING 8
09 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ASSESMENT 9
09.1 GROUND CONDITIONS 9
09.2 SOIL PARAMETER 9
09.3 BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT 13
09.4 ROAD AND HARDSTANDINGS 14
10 CONCLUSIONS 14
11 APPENDIX 1 – BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS 15
12 APPENDIX 2 – BOREHOLE RECORDS 16
13 APPENDIX 3 – CPT RESULTS 17
14 APPENDIX 4 – LABORATORIUM TEST RESULTS 18
15 APPENDIX 5 – PHOTO ACTIVITY 19
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 SITUS CLASSIFICATION – SNI 1726:2012 5
TABLE 2 COORDINATES OF SOIL INVESTIGATION 7
TABLE 3 INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE CORRELATION FROM N-SPT 9
TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF SOIL LABORATORY TESTS 12
TABLE 5 SOIL DESIGN PARAMETER INTERPRETATION 13
TABLE 6 BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT AT AREA FACTORY 13
TABLE 7 BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT AT AREA OFFICE 14
TABLE 8 BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT AT AREA OUTLET AND LOBBY 14
TABLE 9 BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT AT AREA INNER RING-WALKWAY 14
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LOCATION OF PROJECT 4
FIGURE 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF BALI 5
FIGURE 3 PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION FOR EARTHQUAKE PERIOD 500 YEARS 6
FIGURE 4 SOIL INVESTIGATION LOCATION 7
FIGURE 5 SUMMARY OF N-SPT CORRECTED 10
FIGURE 6 SUMMARY OF qc(CPT) FOR EACH BOREHOLE 11

4 of 14
01. PURPOSE
This report describes the soil investigation campaign which consists of borehole, cone penetration test (CPT) and test
pit for foundation analysis of factory, office, walkway and others for Sweet Dreams project.

02. GENERAL
The soil investigation campaign was located at area of Bali Culinary Pastry School, Beraban village, Tabanan district,
Bali. The site is located about 18 km North-west of Bali’ capital, Denpasar city, and is reachable by road via an asphalt-
paved provincial road. The site is adjacent Tanah Lot at about 5km to the west. Location is shown in Figure 1
Figure 1 Location of Project
03. RESPONSIBILITIES
PT. Munjo Geoteknika Utama (MGU) has been commisioned by PT Enrique Indonesia to carried out soil investigation
campaign.
04. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
SNI1726:2012 is an Indonesia’s standard for earthquake resistance design procedures for buildings and non-buildings
GWL means ground water level which measured during borehole drilling activity. This measurement for shallow ground
water level which categorized a confined GWL because it can fluctuate level due to influence by rain infiltration.
05. REFERENCES
‐ SNI 8460‐2017 Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik
‐ Bowles, J.E. (1997) Foundation Analysis and Design, 5th Ed., McGraw‐Hill Company, Inc., New York.

5 of 19
06. REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The location of the soil investigation consists of plains and valleys with small rivers which lead to the coast of Nyanyi. The
site composed by Latosol soil formed from the weathering of sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. The material
composed of yellowish-brown silty sand CLAY with some gravel.
The assessment of geology condition was based on review regional geological maps published by Geological Research
and Development Centre (GRDC) Bandung – Geological Map of Bali and Nusa Tenggara by MM Purbo, H Samudra, at
al., 1998. The regional geology of Bali is shown in Figure 2.
The lithology of the investigation area can be summarized as follows:

 The youngest strata are composed of Latosol soils, followed by alluvium (Qa), which consist of sand, silt and
clay as river and coastal/marine deposits.
 As bedrock of Project, Batur Volcanic Formation (Qpbb) which consist of Tuff and Lava mainly underlies site
and its vicinity.
Figure 2 Regional Geology of Bali
07. GEOHAZARD
07.1 SEISMIC
Figure 3 is a generalized seismic zone map 2010 presenting peak horizontal ground acceleration (PGA) as a percentage
of the acceleration of gravity (g). The hazard level depicted represent the PGA associated with a 10 percent probability
of being exceeded in 50 years (return period of 475 years) for bedrock conditions. The peak acceleration at base rock
range from 0.25 – 0.3 g. Based on SNI1726-2012, the investigation area can be classified as SC (hard soil, dense and
soft rock)
Table 1 Situs Classification - SNI1726:2012

6 of 19

Figure 3 Peak Ground Acceleration for Earthquake period 500 years
07.2 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement
Liquefaction and seismic settlement are secondary effects associated with seismic shaking. Liquefaction is a
phenomenon in which loose to medium dense, saturated, granular materials undergo matrix rearrangement, develop high
pore water pressure, and lose shear strength because of cyclic ground vibrations induced by earthquakes. This
rearrangement and strength loss are followed by a reduction in bulk volume of the liquefied soils. The effects of
liquefaction can include the loss of bearing capacity below foundations, settlement in level ground, and instability in areas
of sloping ground (also known as lateral spreading). Liquefaction is generally considered to occur within 15 m of the
ground surface and is often limited to depths of 10 m or less when evaluating deformations that are more significant.
Seismic settlement results from the densification of granular soils during earthquake-induced shaking in dry or partially
saturated soils.
Based on present SPT value evaluation (generally N-SPT value >50 and shallow GWL not found) for liquefaction and
seismic settlement, the site is considered have no potential to liquefaction.
08. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

08.1 Scope of Work
Soil investigation consisted of:

 4 Nos of continuous core drilling with dry rotary method with maximum 20 m depth.
 Standard penetration testing (SPT) at 1.5 m interval
 7 Nos of Cone penetration
 1 No test pit to collect samples for compaction and CBR test purposes
 Sampling
 Laboratory Testing
 Reporting
The location and coordinate of soil investigation shown below in table 2 and figure 4. The coordinates and elevation were
measured as local coordinates.

7 of 19
Figure 4 Soil Investigation Location
Table 2 Coordinates of Soil Investigations
Description Northing Easting Elevation

BH-01 39915.764 39638.665 -2.73
BH-02 39959.296 39631.266 -5.086
BH-03 39987.861 39639.562 -7.335
BH-04 39947.971 39686.181 -3.546
CPT-01 39940.456 39644.167 -3.423
CPT-02 39928.859 39657.038 -2.381
CPT-03 39903.136 39631.362 -2.501
CPT-04 39994.525 39632.828 -8.553
CPT-05 39940.741 39698.442 -3.168
CPT-06 40109.377 39642.179 -0.664
CPT-07 39988.116 39665.016 -8.561
TP-01 40103.226 39636.271 -1.461
08.2 Drilling
Drilling locations were shown in Figure 4. The borehole records are given in Appendix 2 - Borehole Records.

8 of 19
Drilling equipment was used for the project was rotary drilling machine (TOYO) and performed with continuous coring
technique/ full coring by dry rotary method. In drilling process, a core barrel was lowered to the bottom of the borehole by
drill rods.
A 1.5m length core barrel of AW-size drill rod (73 mm) was attached and rotated hydraulically by the drill rig. A tungsten
drill bit attached to the core barrel was used for drilling. Core samples recovered from the borings were putted inside
plastic bags, place in wooden boxes. The retrieved core sample was then stored in core boxes
08.3 Insitu Testing (Standard Penetration Test)
Insitu testing carried out was standard penetration test (SPT). The Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) was carried out
in each borehole at about 1.0 to 1.5 m intervals in accordance to ASTM D1586 to determine the natural bearing resistance
of the subsoil for the purpose of design.
In this method the standard penetration test using the split barrel sample to obtain the resistance of soil to penetration (N
value). The test was conducted by a falling hammer weighing 63.5 kg was raised 0.76 m and dropped onto an anvil which
drove a small diameter split spoon sampler into the soil / rock being tested. The method is applicable to all soil types. It
was most often used in granular material to provide in place bearing strength.
For calculation of N value, the blow count was recorded for each 75 mm penetration for a total penetrated length of 450
mm. The first 150 mm was generally taken as a seating drive. The blow count for the last 300 mm was taken as the N -
value.
In rock or very dense soils, if the blow count has achieved> 50 in 75 mm, the test is stopped and the N value was
estimated by extrapolation for an equivalent 300 mm penetration.
The drilling depth was terminated when SPT Values more than 60 for three times successively.
The SPT N - values are shown on the borehole records in Appendix 2 – Borehole Records
08.4 Soil Sampling
Some representative undisturbed samples (UDS) could not available due to Shelby tube was difficult to penetrate stiff
cohesive soils and sometime loosen to retrieve sand soils. The disturbed samples (DS) then were collected and obtained
from the core for purpose of laboratory soil classification besides undisturbed samples. Type of samples retrieved during
drilling each borehole was shown at Appendix 2 – Borehole Records
Disturbed samples were normally preserved immediately after being recovered in double layered heavy polyethylene
bags sealed to form an airtight bag to properly contain the disturbed sample and prevent moisture loss.
08.5 Cone Penetration Test
A Total of 7 No. of Cone penetration tests have been carried out by one 2.5 tonne capacity cone rigs using a Begemann
Cone. The tests were carried out to refusal (qc > 150 kg / cm 2 ) and measured end resistance ( qc ), Local Skin Friction
(qf ) and Friction Ratio ( qf / qc = Fr ). The CPT test was carried out in accordance to ASTM D3441.
The cone test data has provided valuable information in support of the borehole / trial pit data regarding geology and soil
strength. Cone data interpretation results include soil type, equivalent blow count, friction angle and undrained shear
strength.
The results are presented in Appendix 3 – Cone Penetration Test.
08.6 Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing will be carried out on soil and rock samples in our laboratory in Bandung.
Laboratory testing will be carried out to ASTM Standards and will include:
 Classification Tests - Natural Moisture Content, Atterberg Limits and Particle Size Distribution, Specific Gravity
 Strength Tests - unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests
 Consolidation Tests.
 Earthworks tests Combined Compaction – CBR
The results are presented in Appendix 4 – Soil Laboratory Test Results.

9 of 19
09. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

09.1 Ground Conditions
The interpreted ground conditions beneath the site described below:
 Latosol soil consists of stiff to very stiff, yellowish brown, sandy Silty CLAY, some places found gravel found with
thickness about 2 to 6 m.
 Coastal deposit consists of dense to very dense, dark grey, grayelly clayey silty SAND, coarse grained with
thickness about 6 to 10 m.
 Buyan-Bratan-Batur Volcanic formation (Qpbb) consists of strong, brownish grey to dark grey to grey, volcanic
rock.lava, fine grained which found at 12 m depth from existing ground surface.
Ground water level was not found during borehole drilling activity.
09.2 Soil parameter
Soil parameter data is taken from all field data in the form of N-SPT data, the value of cone (qc) tip and laboratory data
which are then collected and divided according to the type of soil layer. Determination of each soil parameter is based on
the highest average value for each type of soil layer.
The Undrained shear strength apart from the Triaxial UU data is also taken from the N-SPT data correlation using the
formula from Bowles, 1997 .:
qu = 12N or Su = 6N
For the value of internal friction angle also taken from the N-SPT value which is correlated with the method as follows.
Table 3 Internal Friction Angle Correlation from N-SPT

10 of 19
N-SPT(corrected)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
0
10
Depth (m)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BH01 BH02 BH03 BH04
Figure 5 Summary of N-SPT Corrected
(Note: Corrected N-SPT is the field N-SPT value corrected for drop energy. References from the book Foundation
Analysis and Design, J.E. Bowles, 5th, 1997.)

11 of 19
qc (kg/cm2)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Depth(m)
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
qc(kg/cm2) S1 qc(kg/cm2) S2 qc(kg/cm2) S3 qc(kg/cm2) S4
qc(kg/cm2) S5 qc(kg/cm2) S6 qc(kg/cm2) S7
Figure 6 Summary of qc (CPT) for each borehole

12 of 19
Table 4 Summary of Soil Laboratory Tests

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA FOR PROJECT SWEET DREAMS BALI - TABANAN
BORE HOLE SAMPLE DEPTH(m) DEPTH(m) USCS GS Determination Unit weight of dyr density & moisture content Atterberg limits Particle Size Distribution Analisis Consolidation Po Direct Shear Triaxial UU Su Compaction Cbr Unsoaked
TYPE wL% wP% lP% ( ASTM D 422 ) Test Total Stress Total Stress Test Test
WN m d void ratio Porosityn sr GRAVEL% SAND% SILT% CLAY% Cvcm2/sec Cc Pc kPa C  C  w opt max d
% Mg / m3 Mg / m3 e %
kg/cm2 deg kg/cm2 deg kPA % t/m3 %
BH - 1 DS 1.00 - 1.50 1.5 CH 2.6155 37.51 1.705 1.240 1.11 0.53 88.47 87.28 28.40 58.88 2 12 19 67 8.05E-03 0.336 1.627 26 - - 2.04 11 209 - - -
BH - 1 UDS 2.50 - 3.00 3 CL 2.6724 21.83 1.748 1.435 0.86 0.46 67.65 44.28 23.75 20.53 12 36 18 34 2.03E-03 0.195 1.352 52 - - 0.28 15 42 - - -
BH - 1 DS 5.50 - 6.00 6 SP 2.7148 38.39 1.625 1.174 1.31 0.57 79.45 - NP - 0 72 14 13 2.41E-03 0.347 1.733 98 0.10 30 - - - - -
BH - 1 DS 7.00 - 7.50 7.5 SP 2.6953 36.12 1.640 1.205 1.24 0.55 78.65 - NP - 9 59 14 18 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 1 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7229 43.55 1.596 1.112 1.45 0.59 81.87 - NP - 0 72 15 13 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 2 DS 1.00 - 1.50 1.5 CH 2.5978 43.05 1.656 1.158 1.24 0.55 89.88 94.48 30.53 63.95 0 7 18 75 6.61E-03 0.406 1.510 25 - - 1.99 10 203 - - -
BH - 2 UDS 2.50 - 3.00 3 CH 2.6089 44.33 1.654 1.146 1.28 0.56 90.55 90.36 29.42 60.94 0 9 21 70 5.37E-03 0.411 1.680 50 - - 1.48 7 154 - - -
BH - 2 UDS 4.00 - 4.50 6 CH 2.6366 55.80 1.574 1.010 1.61 0.62 91.40 79.34 28.64 50.70 4 23 25 48 4.69E-03 0.512 1.688 94 - - 0.77 15 103 - - -
BH - 2 DS 7.00 - 7.50 7.5 SP 2.6974 33.32 1.654 1.241 1.17 0.54 76.53 - NP - 5 70 14 11 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 2 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.6856 32.75 1.647 1.240 1.16 0.54 75.50 - NP - 2 68 16 13 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 DS 1.00 - 1.50 1.5 CH 2.6195 42.10 1.675 1.179 1.22 0.55 90.23 92.51 29.34 63.17 0 7 22 71 6.39E-03 0.388 1.628 25 - - 1.87 13 193 - - -
BH - 3 DS 4.00 - 4.50 3 SP 2.7415 22.00 1.765 1.447 0.90 0.47 67.36 - NP - 1 75 13 11 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 DS 5.50 - 6.00 6 SP 2.7375 40.75 1.630 1.158 1.36 0.58 81.75 - NP - 0 72 15 14 5.96E-03 0.361 1.660 0.12 29 - - - - -
BH - 3 DS 8.50 - 9.00 7.5 SP 2.7196 36.78 1.637 1.197 1.27 0.56 78.59 - NP - 4 67 15 14 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7244 20.12 1.787 1.487 0.83 0.45 65.92 - NP - 1 70 16 13 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 UDS 1.00 - 1.50 1.5 CH 2.5922 61.54 1.571 0.972 1.67 0.62 95.77 103.87 31.61 72.26 0 6 13 81 1.38E-03 0.553 1.520 24 - - 1.120 5 114 - - -
BH - 4 DS 4.00 - 4.50 3 SP 2.7514 47.34 1.543 1.047 1.63 0.62 80.01 - NP - 18 59 15 8 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 DS 5.50 - 6.00 6 SP 2.7495 38.36 1.623 1.173 1.34 0.57 78.49 - NP - 0 77 16 7 2.02E-03 0.429 1.681 0.083 31.880 - - - - -
BH - 4 DS 8.50 - 9.00 7.5 SP 2.7374 26.67 1.701 1.343 1.04 0.51 70.33 - NP - 4 71 15 10 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7540 24.25 1.732 1.394 0.98 0.49 68.48 - NP - 3 71 14 12 - - - - - - - - - -
TP - 1 DS - - CH 2.6416 57.19 1.577 1.003 1.63 0.62 92.50 86.11 27.40 58.71 0 14 22 65 - - - - - - - 28.47 1.363 14.12

13 of 19

Table 5 Soil Design Parameter Interpretation
Shear strength Compressibility

Depth, 
Stratum N-SPT Su c*  c' ' Cc Cv Es
m
kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 deg kN/m2 kN/m2 cm2/sec kN/m2
Sandy silty CLAY 0 -6 22 - 30 16.0 150 141 11 - - 0.443 5.6E-03 37,500
Silty SAND 6 - 13 60 17.0 - - 46 - - - - 24,000
Volcanic Rock >13 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500
09.3 Bearing Capacity and Settlement
The design parameters used to determine ultimate bearing capacity are given in Table 3.
Ultimate bearing capacity was calculated using meyerhoff method as follows :
qu = cNc +  DNq + ½  BN
where, qu = ultimate bearing capacity

c = cohesion
 = bulk density
D = depth of foundation
B = width of foundation
Nc, Nq, N = Terzaghi’s bearing capacity factors
The ultimate bearing capacity and allowable bearing pressure based on a factor of safety = 3 obtained from analysis have
been summarized in Table 6.2 for each building area.
It should be noted that the allowable bearing pressure is independent of settlement which is the main design constraint
for the design of shallow foundations.
Immediate settlement was calculated based on settlement theory (Bowles, 1987)
Where,
q0 = net stress on foundation

µs = poison ratio
B’ = width of foundation
Es = elasticities modulus below foundation from z=0 up to z=5B
m = factor depend on foundation location, m = 4 settlement in the center of foundation
Is = shape factor (Steinbrenner, 1934)
If = depth factor (Fox, 1948)
Table 6 Bearing Capacity & Settlement at Area Factory
Depth
Su  q qult qall Se
m Nc Nq N FoS
kPa kN/m3 kN/m2 kPa kPa kPa
0.50 140 16 5.14 1 0 8 728 3 243 13
1.00 140 16 5.14 1 0 16 736 3 245 13
1.50 140 16 5.14 1 0 24 744 3 248 13

14 of 19
Table 7 Bearing Capacity and Settlement Area Office
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 130 16 5.14 1 0 8 676 3 225 12
1.00 130 16 5.14 1 0 16 684 3 228 12
1.50 130 16 5.14 1 0 24 692 3 231 12
Table 8 Bearing Capacity and Settlement Area Outlet and Lobby
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 120 16 5.14 1 0 8 625 3 208 11
1.00 120 16 5.14 1 0 16 633 3 211 11
1.50 120 16 5.14 1 0 24 641 3 214 11
Table 9 Bearing Capacity and Settlement Area Inner Ring-Walkway
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 150 16 5.14 1 0 8 779 3 260 15
1.00 150 16 5.14 1 0 16 787 3 262 15
1.50 150 16 5.14 1 0 24 795 3 265 15
09.4 Road and Hardstandings
Unsoaked CBR laboratory on sandy Silty CLAY samples shows CBR value is 14.12%. It can be concluded that existing
soil surface layer is quite good quality foundation for road and hardstandings.
The development site is for factory and tourism; thus, it predicted the traffic load less than 10-15 tonne trucks. For
preliminary pavement thickness purposes, the road pavement can consist of 50 mm thick of bitumen hotmix asphalted,
250mm gravelly sand, and existing soil layer (sandy Silty CLAY).
10. CONCLUSIONS
In general, the site is underlain by 6 m thick of stiff to very stiff sandy silty CLAY and 7 m thick of dense to very dense
silty SAND. It means the site have a good bearing capacity to resist loadings from upper structure.
For building foundation design, it recommended to use 1.5 m width of square shallow footing foundation and placing at
1.5 m depth from existing ground level surface. To increase lateral resistance to resist lateral load, it recommended to
perform compaction in edge of footing after backfilling the foundation.

15 of 19
11. APPENDIX 1 – BEARING CAPACITY & SETTLEMENT CALCULATIONS

ENGINEERING CALCULATION SHEET (ECS)
PROJECT : SWEET DREAMS LOCATION : TABANAN - BALI
SUBJECT : SOIL PARAMETER & BEARING CAPACITY REV : A SHEET : 1 / 6
1 Soil parameter & bearing capacity

The analysis was taken for each area due to soil layer thickness varies.
1.1 Soil Parameter Area Factory and Technical Building

Undrained shear strength was derived from correlation N-SPT, Triaxial UU from BH01,CPT01,02,03
Su,(kPa) ,(deg)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 10 20 30 40 50
0 0
1 1
2 2
3 3 sandy silty CLAY
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
silty SAND
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
Vulcanic Rock
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Su‐NSPTBH01 Su‐TXLUU_BH1 Su‐qcCPT01

Su‐qcCPT02 Su‐qcCPT03 phi‐NSPT_BH1
Notes:
-N-SPT : correlation to 6N=Su

Depth, 
Stratum N-SPT Su c*  c' ' Cc Cv Es
m
Sandy silty CLAY 0 -5 23 16.0 135 116 13 - - 0.336 5.0E-03 33,750
Silty SAND 5 - 12 60 17.0 - 10 43 - - - - 24,000
Volcanic Rock >12 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500

1.2 Bearing capactiy Area Factory

Meyerhoff method
qult = c.Nc + q.Nq + 0.5.B.N
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 140 16 5.14 1 0 8 728 3 243 13
1.00 140 16 5.14 1 0 16 736 3 245 13
1.50 140 16 5.14 1 0 24 744 3 248 13
1.3 Soil Parameter Area Office

Undrained shear strength was derived from correlation N-SPT, Triaxial UU from BH03,CPT04
Su,(kPa) ,(deg)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
0 0
1 1
sandy silty CLAY
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6 silty SAND
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13 Vulcanic Rock
14 14
15 15
Su‐NSPTBH03 Su‐TXLUU_BH3
Su‐qcCPT04 Su‐qcCPT02 phi‐NSPT_BH3

Depth, 
m
Silty SAND 2 - 12 60 17.0 - 12 46 - - - - 24,000
Volcanic Rock >12 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500
1.4 Bearing capactiy Area Office

Meyerhoff method
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 130 16 5.14 1 0 8 676 3 225 12
1.00 130 16 5.14 1 0 16 684 3 228 12
1.50 130 16 5.14 1 0 24 692 3 231 12
`
1.5 Soil Parameter area Outlet and Lobby
Su,(kPa) ,(deg)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
0 0
1 1
sandy silty CLAY
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7 silty SAND
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
Vulcanic Rock
14 14
15 15
Su‐NSPTBH04 Su‐TXLUU_BH4 Su‐qcCPT05 phi‐NSPT_BH4

Depth, 
m
Silty SAND 2 - 12 60 17.0 - - 46 - - - - 24,000
Volcanic Rock >12 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500

1.6 Bearing capactiy Area Outlet and Lobby

Meyerhoff method
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS `
0.50 120 16 5.14 1 0 8 625 3 208 11
1.00 120 16 5.14 1 0 16 633 3 211 11
1.50 120 16 5.14 1 0 24 641 3 214 11
1.7 Soil Parameter area Inner Ring

Su,(kPa) ,(deg)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
0 0
1 1
2 2
sandy silty CLAY
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
silty SAND
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14 Vulcanic Rock
15 15
Su‐NSPTBH02 Su‐TXLUU_BH2 Su‐qcCPT07 phi‐NSPT_BH2


Depth, 
m
Silty SAND 6 - 13 60 17.0 - - 46 - - - - 24,000
Volcanic Rock >13 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500
1.8 Bearing capactiy Area inner ring

Meyerhoff method
Depth
m Nc Nq N FoS
0.50 150 16 5.14 1 0 8 779 3 260 15
1.00 150 16 5.14 1 0 16 787 3 262 15
1.50 150 16 5.14 1 0 24 795 3 265 15
16 of 19
12. APPENDIX 2 – BOREHOLE RECORDS

GEOLOGIC DRILLING LOG
PROJECT : SWEET DREAMS COORDINATE GROUND ELEV : ‐2.73m BH NO.
LOCATION : TABANAN ‐ BALI N 39915.76 RIG : Toho
DATE : 17 to 18‐01‐2018 E. 39638.67 DRILL MASTER : Agus
BH‐1
TOTAL DEPTH : 20.00 m LOGGED BY : Ridho M
G W L : ‐ m CHECKED BY : WHD
SAMPLING SPT
CASING
N VALUE (BELOWS/30 Cm)
RELATIVE DENSITY
CASING 0D (mm)
ELEVATION (M)
SYMBOLIC LOG
SOIL and/or ROCK DESCRIPTION
CONSISTENCY
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DEPTH (M)
DEPTH (M)
SOIL TYPE
WEATHER
N1 N2 N3
DRILLING
N VALUE
BEFORE
D A T E
TYPE

0,00
Slightly Gravel, Sandy Silty CLAY
Ø 89 MM UP TO 1.50 M DEPTH
(0.00 m ‐ 5.50 m) 1.00
Yellowish brown, high plasticity, moist 1.50 18 20 10
STIFF TO VERY .STIF

30
2.00 Gravel(2%),Sand(12%),Silt(19%),Clay(67%) 1.95 15 15 15
CH ‐ CL
2.50
v
3.00 15 23 17
40
….becoming medium plasticity, hard 3.45 15 15 15
4.00 increasing Sand portion at 2.50 m depth
4.50 17 24 36
60
4.95 15 15 15
5.50
6.00 6.00 17 25 35
60
Silty SAND (5.50 m ‐ 12.00 m) 6.45 15 15 15
Dark grey, medium to coarse grained, moist 7.00
DENSE TO VERY .DENSE
Gravel(3%),Sand(67%),Silt(30%),Clay(30%) 7.50 30 60
60
8.00 7.95 15 15 15
17 ‐ 18 January 2019
9.00 14 23 37
60
9.45 15 15 15
CLEAR
10.00
10.50 17 30 30
60
10.95 15 15 15
11.50
12.00 12.00 20 60
60
Volcanic Rock(12.00 m ‐ 20.00 m) 12.45 15 15 15
Brownish grey to dark grey, slightly weathered
to fresh [Batur Volcanic Formation, Qpbb) 13.50 25 60
60
14.00 13.95 15 15 15
15.00 15 60
60
15.45 15 15 15
STRONG
16.00
16.50 20 60
60
16.95 15 15 15
18.00 18.00 18 60
60
18.45 15 15 15
19.50 16 60
60
20.00 19.95 15 15 15
end of borehole
CL
REMARK :
Spilt barel Undisturbed Sample (UDS) Disturbed Sample (DS) Core Samples
FIG : A ‐ 1
DATE : 20/01/2019 E. 39631.27 DRILL MASTER : Agus
BH‐2
SAMPLING SPT
CASING
RELATIVE DENSITY
CASING 0D (mm)
ELEVATION (M)
SYMBOLIC LOG
CONSISTENCY
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DEPTH (M)
DEPTH (M)
SOIL TYPE
WEATHER
N1 N2 N3
DRILLING
N VALUE
BEFORE
D A T E
TYPE

0,00
Slightly Gravel, Sandy Silty CLAY
(0.00 m ‐ 4.00 m) 1.00
STIFF TO V.STIFF

Yellowish Brown, high plasticity, moist 1.50 8 13 17
30
CH
2.50
v
3.00 10 15 22
37
..becoming hard at 3.00 m depth 3.45 15 15 15
4.00 4.00
4.50 v 25 27 23
50
Silty SAND (4.00 m ‐ 13.00 m) 4.95 15 15 15
Dark grey, medium to coarse grained, moist
20 January 2019
59
6.45 15 15 15
Clear
7.00
7.50 25 60
60
8.00 7.95 15 15 15
SP
9.00 15 60
60
9.45 15 15 15
10.00
10.50 25 60
60
10.95 15 15 15
11.50
12.00 12.00 20 60
60
12.45 15 15 15
Volcanic Rock(13.00 m ‐ 14.00 m) 13.50 15 60
STRONG
60
14.00 Brownish grey to dark grey, slightly weathered 13.95 15 15 15
to fresh [Batur Volcanic Formation, Qpbb)
end of borehole
REMARK :
FIG : A ‐ 1
BH‐3
SAMPLING SPT
CASING
RELATIVE DENSITY
CASING 0D (mm)
ELEVATION (M)
SYMBOLIC LOG
CONSISTENCY
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DEPTH (M)
DEPTH (M)
SOIL TYPE
WEATHER
N1 N2 N3
DRILLING
N VALUE
BEFORE
D A T E
TYPE

STIFF TO V.STIFF
0,00
Sandy Silty CLAY (0.00 m ‐ 2.00 m)
Yellowish Brown, high plasticity, moist 1.00
CH
Sand(7%),Silt(22%),Clay(71%) 1.50 9 13 17
30
2.00 1.95 15 15 15
Silty CLAY SAND (2.00 m ‐ 11.00 m) 3.00 15 23 27
50
Dark grey, medium to coarse grained, moist 3.45 15 15 15
4.00 Gravel(1%),Sand(71%),Silt(15%),Clay(13%) 4.00
4.50 20 60
60
4.95 15 15 15

5.50
21 ‐ 22 January 2019
6.00 6.00 30 60
60
6.45
SP
15 15 15
Clear
7.50 18 60
60
8.00 7.95 15 15 15
8.50
9.00 22 60
60
9.45 15 15 15
10.00
10.50 28 60
60
10.95 15 15 15
11.50
12.00 Volcanic Rock(11.00 m ‐ 14.00 m) 12.00 35 60
STRONG
60
Brownish grey to dark grey, slightly weathered 12.45 15 15 15
to fresh [Batur Volcanic Formation, Qpbb)
13.50 30 60
60
14.00 13.95 15 15 15
end of borehole
REMARK :
FIG : A ‐ 1
BH‐4
SAMPLING SPT
CASING
RELATIVE DENSITY
CASING 0D (mm)
ELEVATION (M)
SYMBOLIC LOG
CONSISTENCY
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DEPTH (M)
DEPTH (M)
SOIL TYPE
WEATHER
N1 N2 N3
DRILLING
N VALUE
BEFORE
D A T E
TYPE

0,00
Sandy Silty CLAY (0.00 m ‐ 2.00 m)
Yellowish Brown, high plasticity, moist 1.00
CH
STIFF TO V.STIFF

v
Sand(67%),Silt(13%),Clay(81%) 1.50 10 12 18
30
2.00 1.95 15 15 15
Gravelly, Clayey Silty SAND (2.00 m ‐ 12.00 m) 3.00 25 50
50
Dark grey, medium to coarse grained, moist 3.45 15 15 15
4.00 Gravel(6%),Sand(70%),Silt(15%),Clay(9%) 4.00
4.50 15 60
60
4.95 15 15 15
5.50
22 ‐ 23 January 2019
6.00 6.00 17 25 35
60
6.45 15 15 15
Clear

….becoming coarse grained, cemented
SP
at 7.00 m depth 7.50 20 60
60
8.00 7.95 15 15 15
8.50
9.00 30 60
60
9.45 15 15 15
10.00
10.50 22 60
60
10.95 15 15 15
11.50
12.00 12.00 28 60
60
Volcanic Rock(12.00 m ‐ 14.00 m) 12.45 15 15 15
STRONG
Brownish grey to dark grey, slightly weathered
to fresh [Batur Volcanic Formation, Qpbb) 13.50 35 60
60
14.00 13.95 15 15 15
end of borehole
REMARK :
FIG : A ‐ 1
17 of 19
13. APPENDIX 3 – CPT RESULTS

FIELD DATA INVESTIGATION
DUCTH CONE PENETROMETER TEST
Project Sweet Dreams Coordinate Northing 39940.456 Operator Agus Cs

Location Tabanan - Bali Easting 39644.167 Checked By Ridho M
Date 20/01/19 elevation -3.423 GWL - meter
Test No. CPT-01
Dial Reading Dial Reading Frictional

Depth Local Friction Total Friction Friction Ratio
(R1) (R2) Resistance Remaks
meter kg/cm² kg/cm² kg/cm² kg/cm² kg/cm %

0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 18 27 9 0.75 15.0 4.17
0.40 25 48 23 1.92 53.3 7.67
0.60 44 91 47 3.92 131.7 8.90
0.80 59 117 58 4.83 228.3 8.19
1.00 70 151 81 6.75 363.3 9.64
1.20 82 195 113 9.42 551.7 11.48
1.40 97 213 116 9.67 745.0 9.97
1.60 120 230 110 9.17 928.3 7.64
1.80 160 265 105 8.75 1103.3 5.47
Page 1 from 2
DUTCH CONE PENETROMETER Test No.
CPT-01
TEST/SONDIR
Project : Sweet Dreams Coordinate : Northing = 39940.456m
Location : Tabanan - Bali Easting = 39644.167m
Date : 20/01/19 Elevation = -3.423m
Operator : Agus Cs Capacity : 2.50 tonf
Checked By : Ridho M GWL : - meter
qc (kg/cm²) tf/10 (kg/cm) FR (%)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
qc>150kg/cm2
2 2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10

Test No. CPT-02


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 15 24 9 0.75 15.0 5.00
0.40 27 53 26 2.17 58.3 8.02
0.60 45 97 52 4.33 145.0 9.63
0.80 58 109 51 4.25 230.0 7.33
1.00 68 141 73 6.08 351.7 8.95
1.20 81 175 94 7.83 508.3 9.67
1.40 99 204 105 8.75 683.3 8.84
1.60 106 245 139 11.58 915.0 10.93
1.80 154 255 101 8.42 1083.3 5.47
Page 1 from 2
CPT-02
TEST/SONDIR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
qc>150kg/cm2
2 2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10

Test No. CPT-03


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 20 24 4 0.33 6.7 1.67
0.40 32 53 21 1.75 41.7 5.47
0.60 41 97 56 4.67 135.0 11.38
0.80 58 109 51 4.25 220.0 7.33
1.00 72 141 69 5.75 335.0 7.99
1.20 95 175 80 6.67 468.3 7.02
1.40 103 204 101 8.42 636.7 8.17
1.60 125 245 120 10.00 836.7 8.00
1.80 140 255 115 9.58 1028.3 6.85
2.00 160 270 110 9.17 1211.7 5.73
Page 1 from 2
CPT-03
TEST/SONDIR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
2 2
qc>150kg/cm2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10

Test No. CPT-04


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 23 41 18 1.50 30.0 6.52
0.40 36 60 24 2.00 70.0 5.56
0.60 50 96 46 3.83 146.7 7.67
0.80 67 118 51 4.25 231.7 6.34
1.00 85 155 70 5.83 348.3 6.86
1.20 107 212 105 8.75 523.3 8.18
1.40 125 220 95 7.92 681.7 6.33
1.60 145 240 95 7.92 840.0 5.46
1.80 165 255 90 7.50 990.0 4.55
Page 1 from 2
CPT-04
TEST/SONDIR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
qc>150kg/cm2
2 2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
Project Sweet Dreams Coordinate Northing 39940.741 Operator Zeppri

Test No. CPT-05


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 19 41 22 1.83 36.7 9.65
0.40 30 60 30 2.50 86.7 8.33
0.60 45 96 51 4.25 171.7 9.44
0.80 61 118 57 4.75 266.7 7.79
1.00 78 155 77 6.42 395.0 8.23
1.20 95 212 117 9.75 590.0 10.26
1.40 109 220 111 9.25 775.0 8.49
1.60 130 240 110 9.17 958.3 7.05
1.80 154 255 101 8.42 1126.7 5.47
Page 1 from 2
CPT-05
TEST/SONDIR
Operator : Zeppri Capacity : 2.50 tonf
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
qc>150kg/cm2
2 2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10

Test No. CPT-06


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 12 28 16 1.33 26.7 11.11
0.40 26 40 14 1.17 50.0 4.49
0.60 41 73 32 2.67 103.3 6.50
0.80 56 94 38 3.17 166.7 5.65
1.00 69 125 56 4.67 260.0 6.76
1.20 82 150 68 5.67 373.3 6.91
1.40 90 171 81 6.75 508.3 7.50
1.60 99 185 86 7.17 651.7 7.24
1.80 101 199 98 8.17 815.0 8.09
2.00 107 205 98 8.17 978.3 7.63
2.20 112 215 103 8.58 1150.0 7.66
2.40 118 220 102 8.50 1320.0 7.20
2.60 125 250 125 10.42 1528.3 8.33
2.80 138 260 122 10.17 1731.7 7.37
3.00 145 269 124 10.33 1938.3 7.13
3.20 158 282 124 10.33 2145.0 6.54
Page 1 from 2
CPT-06
TEST/SONDIR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
2 2
3 3
qc>150kg/cm2
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10

Test No. CPT-07


0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.20 21 44 23 1.92 38.3 9.13
0.40 38 62 24 2.00 78.3 5.26
0.60 52 89 37 3.08 140.0 5.93
0.80 67 121 54 4.50 230.0 6.72
1.00 80 150 70 5.83 346.7 7.29
1.20 95 184 89 7.42 495.0 7.81
1.40 112 204 92 7.67 648.3 6.85
1.60 118 231 113 9.42 836.7 7.98
1.80 125 238 113 9.42 1025.0 7.53
2.00 138 250 112 9.33 1211.7 6.76
2.20 145 260 115 9.58 1403.3 6.61
2.40 155 273 118 9.83 1600.0 6.34
Page 1 from 2
CPT-07
TEST/SONDIR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

0 0
1 1
2 2
qc>150kg/cm2
3 3
4 4
Depth (meter)
Depth (meter)
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
18 of 19
14. APPENDIX 4 – LABORATORIUM TEST RESULTS

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA FOR PROJECT
SWEET DREAMSs BALI - TABANAN

BORE Determination Unit weight of dyr density & moisture Atterberg limits Particle Size Distribution Analisis Consolidation Direct Shear Triaxial UU Compaction Cbr Unsoaked
DEPTH USCS GS
content ( ASTM D 422 ) Test Total Stress Total Stress Test Test
wL wP lP
HOLE WN gm g d void ratio Porosity sr GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY Cv Cc Pc C f C f w opt max d
(m) % Mg / m3 Mg / m3 e n % % % % % % % % cm2/sec kg/cm2 deg kg/cm2 deg % t/m3 %
BH - 1 1.00 - 1.50 CH 2.6155 37.51 1.705 1.240 1.11 0.53 88.47 87.28 28.40 58.88 2.24 11.84 19.03 66.89 0.00805 0.336 1.627 - - 2.044 10.504 - - -
BH - 1 2.50 - 3.00 CL 2.6724 21.83 1.748 1.435 0.86 0.46 67.65 44.28 23.75 20.53 11.70 36.17 17.74 34.39 0.00203 0.195 1.352 - - 0.282 14.787 - - -
BH - 1 5.50 - 6.00 SP 2.7148 38.39 1.625 1.174 1.31 0.57 79.45 - NP - 0.00 72.46 14.23 13.31 0.00241 0.347 1.733 0.101 29.630 - - - - -
BH - 1 7.00 - 7.50 SP 2.6953 36.12 1.640 1.205 1.24 0.55 78.65 - NP - 9.09 58.81 14.31 17.79 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 1 11.50 - 12.00 SP 2.7229 43.55 1.596 1.112 1.45 0.59 81.87 - NP - 0.13 71.98 15.22 12.67 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 2 1.00 - 1.50 CH 2.5978 43.05 1.656 1.158 1.24 0.55 89.88 94.48 30.53 63.95 0.00 6.66 18.45 74.89 0.00661 0.406 1.510 - - 1.985 9.944 - - -
BH - 2 2.50 - 3.00 CH 2.6089 44.33 1.654 1.146 1.28 0.56 90.55 90.36 29.42 60.94 0.01 8.82 20.90 70.27 0.00537 0.411 1.680 - - 1.476 7.251 - - -
BH - 2 4.00 - 4.50 CH 2.6366 55.80 1.574 1.010 1.61 0.62 91.40 79.34 28.64 50.70 3.87 23.19 25.16 47.78 0.00469 0.512 1.688 - - 0.766 15.369 - - -
BH - 2 7.00 - 7.50 SP 2.6974 33.32 1.654 1.241 1.17 0.54 76.53 - NP - 5.10 69.87 13.63 11.40 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 2 11.50 - 12.00 SP 2.6856 32.75 1.647 1.240 1.16 0.54 75.50 - NP - 2.33 67.88 16.30 13.49 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 1.00 - 1.50 CH 2.6195 42.10 1.675 1.179 1.22 0.55 90.23 92.51 29.34 63.17 0.00 7.21 21.58 71.21 0.00639 0.388 1.628 - - 1.874 12.864 - - -
BH - 3 4.00 - 4.50 SP 2.7415 22.00 1.765 1.447 0.90 0.47 67.36 - NP - 0.80 74.97 13.24 10.99 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 5.50 - 6.00 SP 2.7375 40.75 1.630 1.158 1.36 0.58 81.75 - NP - 0.00 71.87 14.56 13.57 0.00596 0.361 1.660 0.121 28.620 - - - - -
BH - 3 8.50 - 9.00 SP 2.7196 36.78 1.637 1.197 1.27 0.56 78.59 - NP - 4.11 67.13 14.54 14.22 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 3 11.50 - 12.00 SP 2.7244 20.12 1.787 1.487 0.83 0.45 65.92 - NP - 1.28 69.99 15.68 13.05 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 1.00 - 1.50 CH 2.5922 61.54 1.571 0.972 1.67 0.62 95.77 103.87 31.61 72.26 0.00 5.86 13.46 80.68 0.00138 0.553 1.520 - - 0.212 4.720 - - -
BH - 4 4.00 - 4.50 SP 2.7514 47.34 1.543 1.047 1.63 0.62 80.01 - NP - 18.24 59.26 14.82 7.68 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 5.50 - 6.00 SP 2.7495 38.36 1.623 1.173 1.34 0.57 78.49 - NP - 0.19 76.97 16.18 6.66 0.00202 0.429 1.681 0.083 31.880 - - - - -
BH - 4 8.50 - 9.00 SP 2.7374 26.67 1.701 1.343 1.04 0.51 70.33 - NP - 4.34 71.23 14.93 9.50 - - - - - - - - - -
BH - 4 11.50 - 12.00 SP 2.7540 24.25 1.732 1.394 0.98 0.49 68.48 - NP - 3.18 71.16 14.04 11.62 - - - - - - - - - -
TP - 1 - CH 2.6416 57.19 1.577 1.003 1.63 0.62 92.50 86.11 27.40 58.71 0.16 13.58 21.73 64.53 - - - - - - - 28.47 1.363 14.12
19 of 19
15. APPENDIX 5 – PHOTO ACTIVITY










MGU-DD-TX-0001 - Soil Investigation Report - AA PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MGU-DD-TX-0001 - Soil Investigation Report - AA PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SWEET DREAMS PROJECT

REV. DATE STATUS SURVEYED BY PREPARED BY CHECKED BY VALIDATED BY

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

VALRHONA CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE

REVISION LOCATION OF CHANGE / SECTION / PAGE AFFECTED DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE

A N/A First Issue

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

Figure 1 Location of Project

04. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

06. REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The lithology of the investigation area can be summarized as follows:

Figure 2 Regional Geology of Bali

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

07.2 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement

08. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

Soil investigation consisted of:

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

Figure 4 Soil Investigation Location

Table 2 Coordinates of Soil Investigations

Description Northing Easting Elevation

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

08.3 Insitu Testing (Standard Penetration Test)

08.4 Soil Sampling

08.5 Cone Penetration Test

The results are presented in Appendix 3 – Cone Penetration Test.

08.6 Laboratory Testing

The results are presented in Appendix 4 – Soil Laboratory Test Results.

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

09. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

The interpreted ground conditions beneath the site described below:

09.2 Soil parameter

Table 3 Internal Friction Angle Correlation from N-SPT

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

BH01 BH02 BH03 BH04

Figure 5 Summary of N-SPT Corrected

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

qc(kg/cm2) S1 qc(kg/cm2) S2 qc(kg/cm2) S3 qc(kg/cm2) S4

qc(kg/cm2) S5 qc(kg/cm2) S6 qc(kg/cm2) S7

Figure 6 Summary of qc (CPT) for each borehole

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

Table 4 Summary of Soil Laboratory Tests

BH - 1 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7229 43.55 1.596 1.112 1.45 0.59 81.87 - NP - 0 72 15 13 - - - - - - - - - -

BH - 2 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.6856 32.75 1.647 1.240 1.16 0.54 75.50 - NP - 2 68 16 13 - - - - - - - - - -

BH - 3 DS 4.00 - 4.50 3 SP 2.7415 22.00 1.765 1.447 0.90 0.47 67.36 - NP - 1 75 13 11 - - - - - - - - - -

BH - 3 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7244 20.12 1.787 1.487 0.83 0.45 65.92 - NP - 1 70 16 13 - - - - - - - - - -

BH - 4 DS 4.00 - 4.50 3 SP 2.7514 47.34 1.543 1.047 1.63 0.62 80.01 - NP - 18 59 15 8 - - - - - - - - - -

BH - 4 DS 1.50 - 12.00 12 SP 2.7540 24.25 1.732 1.394 0.98 0.49 68.48 - NP - 3 71 14 12 - - - - - - - - - -

Shear strength Compressibility

Sandy silty CLAY 0 -6 22 - 30 16.0 150 141 11 - - 0.443 5.6E-03 37,500

Silty SAND 6 - 13 60 17.0 - - 46 - - - - 24,000

Volcanic Rock >13 >60 18.0 350 - - - - - - 87,500

09.3 Bearing Capacity and Settlement

Ultimate bearing capacity was calculated using meyerhoff method as follows :

qu = cNc +  DNq + ½  BN

where, qu = ultimate bearing capacity

Immediate settlement was calculated based on settlement theory (Bowles, 1987)

q0 = net stress on foundation

Table 6 Bearing Capacity & Settlement at Area Factory

This document is the property of PT. Valrhona Indonesia.

Table 7 Bearing Capacity and Settlement Area Office