You are on page 1of 521

LUSAIL STADIUM

VALUE ENGNEERING

MILESTONE 4
Validate
Value Engineering
Options
Rev 0
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................6


1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Sustainability .................................................................................................................................... 6
1.3 Concrete Substructure and Superstructure VE Summary ............................................................... 6
1.4 Roof Structure and Steelwork VE Summary: ................................................................................... 6
2 Introduction .....................................................................................................................8
2.1 Stage 4 Report ................................................................................................................................. 8
3 VE of Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance.......................................................... 10
3.1 VE for Architecture and Code......................................................................................................... 10
3.2 VE for FIFA requirements (by AFL) ................................................................................................ 12
3.3 FIFA Compliance and revised Schedule of Area ........................................................................... 14
4 VE of Structural Engineering and Code Compliance ..................................................... 17
4.1 Concrete Sub Structure .................................................................................................................. 17
4.2 Concrete Superstructure ................................................................................................................ 22
4.3 Steel Superstructure ....................................................................................................................... 25
5 VE of Plumbing and Code Compliance.......................................................................... 26
5.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation .............................................................................. 26
5.2 Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate material 26
5.3 Non-Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate
material ........................................................................................................................................... 27
5.4 TSE Water Supply System for External Irrigation .......................................................................... 28
5.5 Hot water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate material ................ 28
5.6 Chilled Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate material . 29
5.7 Water Storage System – Additional Storage Required .................................................................. 30
5.8 Domestic Water Booster Pump System – Reduction in equipment capacity ................................ 31
5.9 Pitch Irrigation System – Rainwater Collection & Usage ............................................................... 32
5.10 Combined Building Drainage System – Change of Design to Twin System for Grey Water
Application ...................................................................................................................................... 33
5.11 Grey Water System - Addition ........................................................................................................ 35
5.12 Condensate Recycling - Reduction in Capacity due to Cooling Load Reduction .......................... 35
5.13 Rain Water Drainage System-Reduction due to Reduced Roof Area ........................................... 36
5.14 Roof Cleaning System – Reduction in Equipment Capacity and Selection of Alternate Material .. 38
5.15 Leak Detection System – Water and Energy Savings ................................................................... 38
5.16 Metering and Sub-metering system - Water and Energy Savings ................................................. 39
5.17 Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System – Water and Energy Savings ............................................. 40
5.18 Internal Pipework – Selection of Alternate Material ....................................................................... 41
5.19 Building Management System(BMS) - Water and Energy Savings ............................................... 41
5.20 GSAS Compliance Requirements .................................................................................................. 42
5.21 Approved Vendors’ List .................................................................................................................. 42
6 VE of Fire Protection and Code Compliance ................................................................. 43
6.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation .............................................................................. 43
6.2 Fire water pumps – Reduction ....................................................................................................... 43
6.3 Fire water tanks- Reduction ........................................................................................................... 43
6.4 Generator and fuel tank room– Replace Foam (deluge) with extra hazard sprinkler system ........ 43
6.5 Fire water distribution system for branch fire pipes materials– Replace with alternative material 44
6.6 Approved Vendor’s List – use alternative QCD approved venders................................................ 44
7 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance ........................................................... 45
7.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation .............................................................................. 45
7.2 Cooling and Air flow rates reduction .............................................................................................. 45

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page ii
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

7.3 Smoke Managements .................................................................................................................... 46


7.4 HVAC Equipment ........................................................................................................................... 46
7.5 Mechanical Plant Spaces ............................................................................................................... 49
8 VE of Mechanical/Equipment Engineering and Code Compliance ................................. 50
9 VE of Landscape and External Works and Code Compliance ....................................... 51
9.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 51
9.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 51
9.3 Landscape Layout .......................................................................................................................... 51
9.4 Levels and Grading ........................................................................................................................ 56
9.5 Sustainable Drainage Systems ...................................................................................................... 56
9.6 Hardscape ...................................................................................................................................... 57
Landscape Components .......................................................................................................................... 57
9.7 Landscape Signage and Wayfinding .............................................................................................. 59
10 VE of Civil Infrastructure, Roads and Utilities and Code Compliance............................. 60
10.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 60
10.2 Overview of the Infrastructure works .............................................................................................. 62
10.3 Surveys and Investigation findings ................................................................................................. 65
10.4 Value Engineering Opportunities ................................................................................................... 67
10.5 Summary of Quantities – Schematic Design and VE Proposed .................................................... 74
10.6 VE Exercise Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 76
11 VE of GSAS/ GORD Sustainability Compliance and Code Compliance ......................... 77
12 VE of CFD Modeling of Isothermal, Thermal and Code Compliance.............................. 78
12.1 Topic ............................................................................................................................................... 78
12.2 Topic ............................................................................................................................................... 78
13 VE of Players Pitch and Code Compliance .................................................................... 79
13.1 Hemiview/Turfgrass strategy/Pitch shading structure .................................................................... 79
13.2 Air Circulation System .................................................................................................................... 91
13.3 Turfgrass Reinforcement ................................................................................................................ 92
14 VE of Security Strategy & Blast Analysis and Code Compliance ................................... 94
14.1 Overview......................................................................................................................................... 94
14.2 Overview of Lusail Stadium Security Report .................................................................................. 95
14.3 Review of Threat and Vulnerability Risk Assessment .................................................................... 95
14.4 Review of CCTV Provision ............................................................................................................. 96
14.5 Review of Access Control Systems ............................................................................................... 98
14.6 Review of Physical Security ........................................................................................................... 98
14.7 Search and Screening .................................................................................................................... 99
14.8 Review of Security Stakeholders Requirements ............................................................................ 99
14.9 Hostile Vehicle Mitigation ............................................................................................................... 99
14.10 Review of Blast Requirements ..................................................................................................... 100
14.11 Façade Response ........................................................................................................................ 102
14.12 Structural Response to Blast ........................................................................................................ 107
14.13 Review of Ballistic Threats ........................................................................................................... 109
15 VE of Electrical Engineering including ICT Analysis and Code Compliance................. 111
15.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation ............................................................................ 111
15.2 Lighting System ............................................................................................................................ 121
15.3 Fire Detection, Alarms and Life Systems - Reduction in devices and material cost .................... 124
15.4 ICT SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................. 127
15.5 Audio Visual and Multimedia ........................................................................................................ 131
15.6 BMS - Reduction in material cost ................................................................................................. 134
16 VE of Facade Engineering - Inhabit Engineering ......................................................... 135
16.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 135
16.2 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 137
16.3 Design Intent Key information ...................................................................................................... 146

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page iii
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.4 Current Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 155


16.5 Analysis of Current Design ........................................................................................................... 156
16.6 Preliminary Value Engineering options ........................................................................................ 160
16.7 Value Engineering Options ........................................................................................................... 161
16.8 Façade Optimisation .................................................................................................................... 176
16.9 Specification Value Engineering................................................................................................... 199
17 VE of Roof Structure and Steel - OPS Structural Engineering ..................................... 205
17.1 Roof Structure .............................................................................................................................. 205
17.2 Stand and Terrace Structure ........................................................................................................ 210
17.3 Façade Structure .......................................................................................................................... 219
17.4 Roof Structure and Steelwork VE Summary: ............................................................................... 234
18 VE of Crowd Modeling - Crowd Dynamics ................................................................... 235
18.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 235
18.2 Internal Circulation ....................................................................................................................... 237
18.3 External Crowd Movement ........................................................................................................... 242
18.4 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 261
19 Consideration of Legacy Approach related to VE Decisions ........................................ 262
19.1 Architecture: ................................................................................................................................. 262
19.2 Structural: ..................................................................................................................................... 262
19.3 Plumbing System ......................................................................................................................... 263
19.4 Fire Protection .............................................................................................................................. 269
19.5 HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance for Legacy mode ...................................................... 273
19.6 Electrical ....................................................................................................................................... 277
19.7 Lighting System ............................................................................................................................ 284
19.8 Fire Detection, Alarms and Life Systems ..................................................................................... 285
19.9 ICT SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................................. 286
19.10 Audio Visual and Multimedia ........................................................................................................ 287
19.11 BMS .............................................................................................................................................. 288
19.12 CCTV ............................................................................................................................................ 289
19.13 Access Control Systems .............................................................................................................. 289
19.14 Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................ 289
20 VE of Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to FIFA Compliance ..................... 293
20.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 293
20.2 SC Standards ............................................................................................................................... 293
20.3 Concessions ................................................................................................................................. 294
20.4 Main Kitchen ................................................................................................................................. 294
20.5 Hospitality Finishing Kitchens....................................................................................................... 295
20.6 Existing Proposed Provision......................................................................................................... 296
20.7 Revised Proposed Provision ........................................................................................................ 298
20.8 CONCESSIONS ........................................................................................................................... 301
21 VE of Miscellaneous Opportunities, including minor commodity items ......................... 302
21.1 Topic ............................................................................................................................................. 302
21.2 Topic ............................................................................................................................................. 302
22 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 303

Appendix A Supporting Information: Calculations, Reports, Cost Estimates and Sketches


A-1 VE of Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance
A-2 VE of Structural Engineering and Code Compliance
A-3 VE of Plumbing and Code Compliance
A-4 VE of Fire Protection and Code Compliance
A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page iv
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-6 VE of Mechanical/Equipment Engineering and Code Compliance


A-7 VE of Landscape and External Works and Code Compliance
A-8 VE of Civil Infrastructure, Roads and Utilities and Code Compliance
A-9 VE of GSAS/ GORD Sustainability Compliance and Code Compliance
A-10 VE of CFD Modeling of Isothermal, Thermal and Code Compliance
A-11 VE of Players Pitch and Code Compliance
A-12 VE of Security Strategy & Blast Analysis and Code Compliance
A-13 VE of Electrical Engineering including ICT Analysis and Code Compliance
A-14 VE of Facade Engineering - Inhabit Engineering
A-15 VE of Roof Structure and Steel - OPS Structural Engineering
A-16 VE of Crowd Modeling - Crowd Dynamics
A-17 Consideration of Legacy Approach related to VE Decisions
A-18 VE of Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to FIFA Compliance
A-19 VE of Miscellaneous Opportunities, including minor commodity items
Appendix B Conforming Tender (Pricing Schedule + Tender Adjustment Schedule)
Appendix C Alternative Tender (Pricing Schedule + Tender Adjustment Schedule – VE
Items)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page v
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

1 Executive Summary

1.1 Introduction

This report has been prepared in response to Lusail Stadium Value Engineering Scope of
Service and is submitted to the Design and Build Contractor (HBK-CRCC JV) for their review
and approval. It is the Stage 4 deliverable in a six-stage process to produce an alternative to
the ‘base-bid’ Norman Foster FIFA World Cup design for the stadium. In the report, the team is
tasked with following a structured evaluation process to select those ideas that offer the potential
for VE improvement while delivering the project’s goals and considering performance
requirements and resource limits. Following review of the Stage 4 deliverables by the client,
KEO will take on board comments received from the JV and provide iterations to the VE items
and incorporate into the Stage 5 – Final Value Engineering Report.

The main conclusions and points of note follow in the Executive Summary.

1.2 Sustainability

The VE considerations from a purely sustainability perspective (while still achieving a GSAS 4
Star rating) are:
 Materials Certification 1 - No ISO14001/BS8902 certification requirement for material
suppliers
 Materials Certification 2 - No LCA/EPD Certificates required from material suppliers
 Reduced Specifications of Water & Refrigerant Leak Detection Systems
 Minimum Energy metering and still providing water Sub-metering
 Remove 6,500m2 PV panels from the roof
 Remove bicycle, bicycle lanes and anything else that it is related to bicycles.

1.3 Concrete Substructure and Superstructure VE Summary


 The concrete substructure VE option offers cost savings due to proportional reduction
in bowl area and further optimisation by raising the pitch level, rationalizing single
uniform basement around the pitch and by regularising the grids.
 The concrete superstructure VE option for Level 1 to 6 also offers cost savings due to
proportional reduction in bowl area and further optimisation of number of floors, grids by
which we can optimize the slab thickness, beam sizes, column sizes and all the steel
reinforcement ratios.
 The steel superstructure VE options for part of Level 5 and 6 and full floor of Level 7 and
8 is also offering cost savings due to proportional reduction in bowl area and further
optimisation by regularising the grid. This option is used mainly for legacy mode for
which if required, it can be easily demounted, dismantled and reused.

1.4 Roof Structure and Steelwork VE Summary:


 The Roof VE option offers cost savings over that than which results in the proportional
reduction in roof area and further optimisation in the next stage may yield additional
savings
 The steel terrace structure is a viable option which will allow easier removal for the
legacy mode.
 The steel stand structure may not offer significant cost savings over the concrete frame,
however where large clear spans are required, such as adjacent to the façade, the steel
option does provide a number on benefits.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 6
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 In addition to the reduction in area of the vessel surface, the Arup/Foster façade
supporting structure can be considerably simplified whilst maintaining the same (or very
similar) external appearance and as a result significant cost savings can potentially be
achieved.

1.4.1 Crowd Modelling

 The stadium has been assessed internally from a high level perspective to show that the
design has enough flexibility to cater for vertical circulation of spectators and required
vomitory widths for each GA, hospitality and VIP/VVIP spectators.
 The external landscaping of the VE proposal has made use of the additional space and
mitigated the level change from precinct to concourse level within 3 options that have
been analysed. Stair and ramp designs have been proposed based on fifth edition
guidance to be used in the design. Option 1 with stairs and ramps, and options 2a and
2b with only ramps were analysed dynamically and statically as appropriate to measure
their applicability to guidelines.
 Crowd management was considered at a high level through the modelling, analysis and
design, with emergency egress provision in-line with standards previously laid out in
stage 1 and original design documentation.
 Further design iterations and crowd modelling would be required to match the internal
exits with sufficient vertical circulation externally and crowd management strategy being
developed, especially considering emergency provision.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 7
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

2 Introduction

This report has been prepared in response to Lusail Stadium Value Engineering Scope of
Service and is submitted to the Design and Build Contractor (HBK-CRCC JV) for their review
and approval. It is a deliverable in a six-stage process to produce an alternative to the ‘base-
bid’ Norman Foster FIFA World Cup design for the stadium; the target being to reduce the
construction cost from approximately QR5 billion to approximately QR2.8 billion, with the
minimum possible impact on Code Compliance and design intent. The core process involves
assessing the existing design, identifying potential value engineering and cost reduction
opportunities, evaluating the impact of these opportunities on the design intent and compliance
with codes, and preparing a pricing schedule for costing of the alternative design by the HBK-
CRCC JV. Ultimately, a submittal and presentation to The Supreme Committee for Delivery &
Legacy of the alternative design is expected to follow.

The six stages of the process are as follows:

Stage 1 – Design Analysis

Stage 2 – Identify VE Opportunities

Stage 3 – Carry out VE Workshops

Stage 4 – Validate VE Options

Stage 5 – Final Value Engineering Report

Stage 6 – Post-Tender Support

A team of discipline specialists, led by KEO International, was established and the following
specialist sub-consultants commissioned to contribute:
No. Consultant Scope
1. AFL (Neil Tootil) Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance and
Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to
FIFA Compliance
2. Hilson Moran (Matt Kitson) CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal and
Code Compliance
3. STRI (Lee Collier) Players Pitch and Code Compliance
4. J. D. Goode(Mark Coates) Security Strategy and Blast Analysis and Code
Compliance
5. Inhabit Engineering (Giuseppe Facade Engineering
Floriani)
6. OPS Structural Engineering (Mike Roof Structure and Steel
Stephens)
7. Crowd Dynamics (Paul Townsend) Crowd Modelling

2.1 Stage 4 Report

In this Stage 4 Report, the team is tasked with following a structured evaluation process to
select those ideas that offer the potential for VE improvement while delivering the project’s goals
and considering performance requirements and resource limits. The team will develop the
selected ideas into alternatives (or proposals) with a sufficient level of documentation to allow
the Client to determine if the alternative should be implemented. The new options will be
sketched out and calculations/simulations will be carried out to thoroughly assess the impact of

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 8
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

each VE option and validate that the solution can be implemented later in the detailed design
process.

Following review of the Stage 4 deliverables by the client, KEO will take on board comments
received from the JV and provide iterations to the VE items and incorporate into the Stage 5 –
Final Value Engineering Report.

The report is broken down into the following discipline sections.


 Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance
 Structural Engineering and Code Compliance
 Plumbing and Code Compliance
 Fire Protection and Code Compliance
 HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance
 Mechanical/Equipment Engineering and Code Compliance
 Landscape and External Works and Code Compliance
 Civil Infrastructure, Roads and Utilities and Code Compliance
 GSAS/ GORD Sustainability Compliance and Code Compliance
 CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal and Code Compliance
 Players Pitch and Code Compliance
 Security Strategy & Blast Analysis and Code Compliance
 Electrical Engineering including ICT Analysis and Code Compliance
 Facade Engineering - Inhabit Engineering
 Roof Structure and Steel - OPS Structural Engineering
 Crowd Modelling - Crowd Dynamics
 Consideration of Legacy Approach related to VE Decisions
 Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to FIFA Compliance
 Miscellaneous Opportunities
 Legacy Mode Study

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 9
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

3 VE of Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance

3.1 VE for Architecture and Code

3.1.1 The main topics that contributes to Value engineering in the Stadium are the
following:

 Optimize basement floors. Limit to one floor


only at pitch level with all plant rooms and
ancillary services (Media, security, players
dressing rooms, medical room, etc.)
 Reduce floors areas to comply with minimum
FIFA and Supreme Committee requirements.
floor plans are detailed below in item 3.2.
Plaza level was reduced 12m all around.
Roof level was reduced by 11m (approx.) at
the highest variation point. Other floors were
reduced as per the illustrated sketches for
plans (Error! Reference source not found., Error!
ference source not found. and Error! Reference
source not found.) and sections (Error!
Figure 3-1: Level 1 Lower Concourse
Reference source not found. and Error! Reference
source not found.)
 With the reduction in floor and roof
footprints, façade vessel can be shifted
inwards.
 With the proposed roof structure as detailed
in structural part below, design Roof is
lowered by 11m, this resulted in reduced
height of the façade vessel and thus
reduced façade area.

Figure 3-2: Level 5 Upper Concourse 1

Figure 3-3: Roof Outline

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 10
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Rationalize the façade profile to be constant all around that varies only at the top, achieving the
pringle effect as per the original design. It is worth mentioning that in the original design, façade
profile at the north/south and east/west are different.

Figure 3-4: Comparative East West Section

Figure 3-5: Comparative North South Section

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 11
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion: reduce the number of modular types in the façade and thus reduction in cost.
 Increase Oculus opening by 22m in diameter that resulted in reduced roof area.
 Pitch dimensions were optimized, change curved seating rows to rectangular.
 Raise the pitch level to +5.0 for structural benefits as detailed in structure part below.
 Remove the ceiling skin at the roof that resulted in exposed structure for which fire
protection will be required.
 Optimize the seating and tiers arrangement to comply with FIFA minimum required for
the C value. This is detailed in item 3.2.2 for FIFA minimum requirements.

3.1.2 The secondary items that contribute to the Value Engineering can be summarized
as follows:

 Straighten the façade profile at the plaza soffit level. Conclusion: easier construction
with minimum support framing.
 Air tight all partitions facing the open area facing the vessel, thus, treating the façade as
shading element where the open internal space will be mechanically ventilated only.
 Elevators to be all converted to Machine-room less with standard manufacturer finishes
for passengers and Service/firemen elevators.
 Substantial glass areas were proposed in the original design for core cladding and other
areas. Suggest to convert 60 to 70& of these areas to dry wall lining or partition.
 Fire curtains were proposed for escalator and concession areas. KEO propose to omit
60% of these curtains and replace with sprinklers or drop smoke curtain for around
600mm. fire curtain at concession area will be omitted as this is not considered as fire
zone. This will be further validated with the final fire strategy report.
 Convert Emir circular elevator to square or rectangular glazing elevator.
 Apart from Sky box or VIP areas, internal stone cladding can be changed to render paint
to match stone. Alternative products selection is covered in JV report.
 Façade proposed materials are covered in the façade report below.
 Rubber flooring can be changed to vinyl tiles. Alternative products selection is covered
in JV report.
 Change the stainless steel railing with low iron glass to power coated aluminium and
standard temper or laminated annealed glass.
 Bespoke metal or curved ceiling can be converted to manufacturer metal ceiling, GRG
or Gypsum.
 Excluding Emir and VVIP areas, bespoke furniture can be changed to off-the-shelf
product. Alternative products selection is covered in JV report.

Refer to appendix A-1 for the proposed VE items on architecture.

3.2 VE for FIFA requirements (by AFL)

3.2.1 Bowl Design

The stadium bowl design of the tendered Foster scheme is in itself a FIFA compliant bowl. All
minimum and maximised dimensions required by FIFA are met. However, there are
improvements to the design and layout of the bowl which can be incorporated, these are
represented on the design and detail drawings by AFL Architects contained within the Appendix.
These changes bring Value Engineering in terms of standardisation and construction of the
bowl, whilst improving the number of seat kills due to restricted views. The terrace layout of the
tendered scheme is based on a radial grid not only in the corners but also along the goal line
and touchlines. This type of design means the front row of the East / West & North / South
stands are somewhat further away from the pitch than the minimum FIFA dimensions and this
also presents a significant number of seat kills due to the pitch perimeter advertising hoarding.
Whilst the grid is radial it also means the terrace units in each structural bay are not of equal

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 12
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

lengths, therefore leading to increase costs in the production of the pre cast concrete units and
splayed connection details for the main steelwork. Our value engineered scheme shows the
terracing of East / West & North / South being parallel to the pitch meaning the grid will be
perpendicular to terrace and pitch. This brings standardisation of pre cast concrete terrace units
along with simpler main steel connection details. Corner terracing is still required to be radial
matching the tendered scheme.

3.2.2 C Values for terrace seating.

The current tendered scheme represents a large section of the terrace seating giving a C Value
of C60. This is a minimum standard required by FIFA but isn’t good practice as a low C Value
will encourage spectators to stand, which is against requirements. C60 is acceptable to an upper
tier terrace due to the angle of view to the pitch compared to the obstruction of the person sat
in front. The presented value engineered scheme gives C Values to the lower tier of C90 – C100
too East / West and C100 – C110 too North / South. Upper tier C Values are C60 too East /
West and C70 too North / South.

3.2.3 Maximum viewing distances

FIFA recommend a maximum viewing distance from the terrace seating to the diagonally
opposite corner flag of 190m, the tendered scheme has approximately 12% of the seating
outside this radius dimension. Our revised Value Engineered scheme reduces this figure to 5%.
This has been achieved by changing the footprint shape of the terracing too circular. This
revised shape has brought significant structural efficiencies and savings to overall areas to the
façade and roof design as noted within the section covered by OPS Structures.

3.2.4 Capacity

The tendered scheme and FIFA requires a net capacity of 80,000 spectators not including VIP,
VVIP’s and Media for the World Cup Final. The tendered scheme gives a gross capacity of
92,272.

3.2.5 VE Scheme capacity

The tendered scheme suffers greatly from seat kills due to obstructions from the pitch perimeter
advertising hoarding. These figures range from 3800 up to a maximum of 7500 seats depending
upon the location and slope of the pitch perimeter run off area. These figures are unacceptable
and may be discounted from the net figure depending upon the severity. Our Value engineered
terrace layout gives a Gross capacity of 91,355. Due to the redesigned terrace layout being
parallel and closer to the touch and goal lines this has reduced the number of seat kills from the
advertising hoarding to a maximum of 1118. When comparing this number with the tendered
scheme this suggests we can further reduce the gross capacity, this needs to be carried out in
the detail design stage.

3.2.6 Video Screens

FIFA requires minimum of 2 video screens of at least 70m2 and a format of 16:9 which are able
to be viewed by all spectators. The tendered scheme shows a structural complicated cut out
section to the front of the upper tiers of the north and south stands where a screen is housed to
each. Our VE scheme has removed these cut outs and replaced with terracing. The video
screens are now located under the main roof of the wall to the rear of the terrace. Due to the
roof structure and necessity for all spectators to view the screens we require a total of 4 screens,
one for each corner diagonally opposite each other.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 13
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

3.2.7 Bowl Access

3.2.7.1 VIP / VViP

Access to Vip / VViP lounges are from west stand level 0 access road via a private stair and lift
core with access also available at podium level 1. Lounges are located to the rear of the lower
tier at level 2 with seating directly available from their lounge for ViP guests. VViP lounge is at
Level 3 with again direct terrace access to their seating section. Tender scheme occupancy
numbers for VViP was 300 and for ViP 1700, this is in excess of the requirements of the FIFA
5th Edition. This documentation this has requirement for 150 VViP and 1350 VViP therefore we
have included this within our design.

The tendered scheme basis the lounge areas on a floor space factor of 1.8m2 per person for
all lounges. Minimum FIFA area requirements are for 1m2 per person therefore the revised VE
scheme acknowledges these criteria and the lounges are designed to 1m2 per person. We have
acknowledged the level of importance of the VViP lounge and have used the same area per
person as the tendered scheme to this lounge, 1.8m2/pers. The VViP lounge is located centrally
to the Sky Box level. Terrace seating direct from the lounge into their own segregated section.

3.2.7.2 Hospitality / Sky Boxes

Hospitality and Sky Box occupancies are required by FIFA as a percentage of the gross
capacity, 8%. This figure is then used to determine the amount of Sky Box occupants, which is
30% of the figure. Our value engineered scheme is based on these figures.

The tender design shows Hospitality seats to the rear section of the lower tier and within the
Value Engineered scheme this principle is followed. In the tender design the hospitality
spectators are offered pitch views around the stadium, this is not a FIFA requirement and as
such we have limited the amount of pitch side glazing.

Hospitality Lounges within the tendered scheme are based on 1.8m2/person, our value
engineered follows the requirements of the FIFA 5th Edition documentation requiring
1m2/person.

Sky Boxes occupy a ring at level 3 in the middle of upper and lower tiers. Seating is direct from
the Sky Box.

3.3 FIFA Compliance and revised Schedule of Area

3.3.1 Space requirements

We have undertaken a detailed review of the tender scheme’s area schedule and compared
this to the FIFA 5th edition minimum requirements (or used international best practice where
silent). This has been organised into a schedule referenced SOA-FIFA WCF (Rev P5).

The schedule is organised vertically by FIFA World Cup requirements in Category order.

Horizontally the schedule is organised in the first few columns as follows:


 Name of Space
 Number
 Occupancy
 Dimensions (see 3.3.2 below)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 14
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

3.3.2 Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance

Then to clarify where these parameters for the required room & sizes come from there are two
columns.
 Design Requirement Origin: simply states whether FIFA or the SC requires the existence
of the room. For example, we have retained key spaces such as prayer rooms from the
SC requirements. Toilets will also be required in all spaces even if not explicitly stated
by the FIFA 5th edition.
 Guidance Document used for Area: in the following preferential order. When the
previous guidance document is silent the next one will be used and so on.

1. (FIFA 5th) Technical Recommendations 5th ed.

2. (GG) Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds

3. (BP) Best Practice

4. (SC) Supreme Committee

3.3.3 VE Redesign Location

Here we go back to basics with the FIFA 5th edition and broad location that each space is
required:
 (S) Stadium
 (SB) Seating Bowl
 (IP) Inner Perimeter
 (OP) Outer Perimeter
 (P) Precinct
 (HV) Hospitality Village

We then use a combination of the FIFA 5th edition and Best Practice to locate the spaces on
the best level within the proposed VE scheme.

3.3.4 Area comparisons Stadium

This section compares the areas required in the stadium:


 Required Minimum Area (FIFA 5th or other requirement if FIFA silent on area)
 Required minimum area where the SC have uplifted beyond FIFA 5th minimum
 Tender Scheme Area as scheduled in the tender documents

3.3.5 Area comparisons Precinct

This section compares the areas required in the wider precinct:


 Required Minimum Area (FIFA 5th or other requirement if FIFA silent on area)
 Required minimum area where the SC have uplifted beyond FIFA 5th minimum
 Tender Scheme Area as scheduled in the tender documents

3.3.6 Tender Scheme Reference and Location

This includes references for the Room Code, location and level for the original tender scheme.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 15
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

3.3.7 Nature & timing of the structure

FIFA 5th edition specifies whether the space can be temporary or permanent and which phase
of the construction that the space is required. This is particularly useful if the client is wishing to
have some sections of the venue demountable in legacy or adding some facilities as Event
Overlay.

3.3.8 Conclusions of FIFA space reduction analysis

The schedule fully demonstrates the space reductions possible if the VE scheme is built to the
FIFA 5th edition minimums with the exception of certain essential SC requirements such as
prayer rooms and pitch perimeter setting out. The key area savings are as follows:
 General Spectator Areas – a saving of up to 15,000m2. This is predominantly due to
reduced seat kills and an overall reduction of gross seating numbers generating less
concourse. We have also reduced the requirement for large ventilated entrance lobby
areas for the General Spectators (a result of the tournament being held in the winter
months).
 Players Areas – a saving of up to 1,000m2. This is primarily due to the omission of the
additional 2 dressing rooms which are only a recommendation for legacy multipurpose
stadia.
 Ceremonies – a saving of up to 500m2. The tender scheme included a large space inside
the stadium for the ceremonies, we recommend that the majority of this space is built
outside the stadium as event overlay.
 Back of house compound – a saving of up to 5,000m2. Using Best practice for a venue
this size and assuming all further FIFA event logistics is Event Overlay in the Precinct.
 Hospitality Areas – a saving of up to 12,000m2. There are large areas of additional
circulation including plaza level ventilated entrance lobbies and support areas that are
simply not required. The lounges are also larger than the FIFA 5th edition, primarily
because the SC has placed large space factors on the design. We have retained
entrance lobbies and support but at a much more sensible level and designed to the
minimum space factors.
 VIP & VVIP Areas - a saving of up to 7,000m2. As with hospitality there are large areas
of additional circulation including plaza level ventilated entrance lobbies and support
areas that are simply not required. The lounges are also larger than the FIFA 5th edition,
primarily because the SC has placed large space factors on the design. We have
retained entrance lobbies and support but at a much more sensible level and designed
to the minimum space factors. The VVIP Lounge is the Emir Suite and as per FIFA 5 th
Edition there is no requirement to double up.
 Security Service - a saving of up to 21,000m2. We have located the essential FIFA
requirements into the Stadium. It is assumed that any event specific requirements are
all part of the Event Overlay in the Precinct.
 General Circulation in non-departmental areas - a saving of up to 17,000m2. General
reduction due to building size and level reduction.
 Plant Areas – a saving of up to 49,000m2. The detail of the saving will be covered
separately in sections 5, 7 & 8 of this report, but essentially it is achieved by re-modelling
the thermal environment in the winter months and the resultant omission of large areas
of non-required cooling plant.
 Total Stadium – when the whole schedule is taken into account, including the savings
above, there is an overall saving of up to 127,400m2. These potential area reductions in
the VE Scheme would need to be fully tested and developed in much more detail going
forward but nonetheless offer significant savings to the Tendered Scheme.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 16
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

4 VE of Structural Engineering and Code Compliance

4.1 Concrete Sub Structure

4.1.1 Introduction

The original design proposed to have the pitch level at -0.3 QND, with stepped basements
around the pitch up to the plaza level of +8.55 QND. The actual ground water level recorded in
geotechnical investigation report is -6 to -7 QND level in 2015. Earlier ground water level
recorded in geotechnical investigation report was +1 QND level in 2005.

Because of continuous dewatering in and around Lusail, the groundwater level lowered
considerably. Once all dewatering stopped, it is expected that the ground water level may raise
up to +3.5 QND level. Urban recharge associated with development of surrounding area, in the
form of widespread irrigation of green areas and infrastructure leakage, may lead to further
increases in groundwater level.

Therefore, Arup assumed to keep the design ground water level as +5.0 QND level. Further
geotechnical investigation is required at later stage to verify above assumption. Considering
this high design ground water level, it would be ideal to propose all possible structural elements
above the ground water level to avoid the uplift.

Hence there is a Value Engineering opportunity to raise the pitch level so that the uplift can be
avoided.

Therefore, the key VE items identified for the concrete sub structure include:
 Raising the pitch level above the design ground water level
 Avoid tension piles under the pitch
 Avoid raft and pile caps under the pitch.
 Reduce the number of basement floor and limit it to one floor at the pitch level.

4.1.2 Pitch Level

As mentioned above we propose to raise the pitch level to +5.0 QND or at the design ground
water level. Exact pitch level can be fixed at next stage based on the design ground water level.
For the time being, it is assumed to propose the pitch level as +5.0 QND.

By raising the pitch level to +5.0 QND or at the design ground water level, we have avoided
considerable number of tension piles under the pitch. In addition, we have also avoided raft
under the pitch including number of pile caps. Moreover, by avoiding the uplift and tension, we
have overcome the dewatering requirement in general.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 17
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 4-1: Arup proposed tension piles shown under pitch.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 18
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 4-2: Arup proposed pile caps and raft shown under pitch.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 19
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

By raising the pitch level, we have also avoided stepped basement around the pitch and
proposed uniform one level of basement at +5.0 QND level. With this proposal, the plaza level
or the ground floor will be at +12.1 QND level. Because of the raise in the pitch level and
removal of the stepped basement, some tension piles under these basements were also
omitted.

Figure 4-3: Arup proposed section showing stepped basement areas which are rationalized.

Similarly, pile caps for these piles and thicker raft proposed for these areas were also omitted
and reduced. The retaining walls proposed for the stepped basement around the stadium were
also considerably reduced and simplified. Since there is no uplift and no design ground water
level to be considered, retaining wall design is optimized and accordingly thickness and
reinforcement ratio were reduced.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 20
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 4-4: Arup proposed basement areas are omitted because of reduction in bowl size.

Similarly, raft thicknesses for the basement is also optimized because of no uplift and tension
forces. Therefore, its thickness and reinforcement ratio were also reduced. Finally, pile caps
under the columns were also value engineered because of raised level and hence its steel
reinforcement were also optimized.

4.1.3 Grids

The framing of the bowl and associated structure will follow the orthogonal grids set out by the
architects as part of this Value Engineering (VE) exercise. This orthogonal grid system results
in a regular arrangement of the frame, with the framing of the lower tiers repeated for the full
bowl.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 21
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

4.1.4 Plaza Level

The original design plaza level was at +8.55 QND. In our value engineering proposal because
of raise in pitch level, the plaza level (which is level 1) is proposed at +12.1 QND. In Arup/Foster
plans it was radial grids and the spans were not typical and we proposed to change to
orthogonal grids in general, so that on average internal columns are spaced at 7.5m centres
approximately.

All internal columns are proposed as circular columns with typical 1000mm diameter. The
proposed framing plan is similar to Arup scheme with beams in one direction of size 900mm
wide x 750mm deep. Typically slab thickness is proposed as 275mm thick.

4.2 Concrete Superstructure

The original design for the superstructure to form the terrace stands and accommodation areas
of this stadium was designed in reinforced concrete. Changing the seating geometry from a
radial to an orthogonal grid permits a more efficient seating plan which in turn allows a significant
reduction in bowl size. Because of reduction in bowl size, the volume of concrete and amount
of steel reinforcement will be reduced on a prorata basis.

In addition to the reduction in the bowl size the number of levels are also rationalized because
of lesser requirements of plant space due to switching the tournament to winter. All the floors
from level 1 to level 6 are proposed as cast in place Reinforced Concrete (RC) structure.
Alternatively Post Tensioned (PT) option is also studied which will have the following
advantages:
 For this span and grid system, PT slab will reduce the required slab thickness to around
220mm as compare to conventional cast in place RC structure
 In terms of weight it will be light construction compared with other concrete systems
 Due to reduction in slab thickness with PT option, foundation load will also reduce and
there will be some cost reduction
 In addition, due to lesser self-weight the seismic load will also reduce as it is
proportionate to the mass of the building.
 Span limitation – It is structurally very efficient for long span

Even though it has lot of advantages as mentioned above, it has the following disadvantages
as well:
 This system will limit any future slab penetration and drilling work in the slab, due to
possible damages to PT tendons.
 All services openings, penetrations, etc. has to be predefined well in advance and has
less flexibility for the future penetration and making it less compatible with the Legacy
use of the structure.
 In case of basements, stressing of the tendons will require special attention and design
consideration due to basement walls all around.
 Less volume of typical floors may increase the cost of mobilisation and construction.

Mainly because of the legacy option in mind which requires lot of future penetration PT system
was not selected.

Similarly, another alternative option of steel composite decking slab was also studied which will
have the following advantages:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 22
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 For this span and grid system, 80 mm concrete on 80 mm steel deck on 533mm steel
beams will work
 In terms of time, it can be quickly erected
 In terms of weight, it will be lighter in construction compared with concrete systems.
 Lighter construction will also reduce the cost of foundation.
 Regarding span limitation, it is structurally efficient for very long spans.
 This is also well suited for super-structure transfer columns (if any) as columns can be
transferred through steel beams.

Even though it has lot of advantages as mentioned above it have the following disadvantages
as well:
 Difficulties in providing MEP openings in metal deck slab as compare to concrete slabs
 In terms of fire rating it will be difficult to achieve the required fire rating fireproofing is
required which lead to extra construction cost
 Regarding maintenance, it is susceptible to corrosion and would require periodic
maintenance
 In terms of cost, it is comparatively high in cost with other options
 It would be difficult to achieve the frequency level of 6Hz required.

Mainly because of cost and achieving the frequency requirement this system is not selected.

Considering the above options, we have decided to continue with the conventional cast in place
RC structure.

Figure 4-5: Proposed reinforced concrete framing plan for concourse levels.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 23
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Part of the Level 5 and 6 slab which is projecting beyond the building line below is proposed to
have a steel framing. We are utilizing the external steel columns supporting the roof and façade
to support this extended portion. In addition, the complete Levels 7 and 8 are also proposed as
steel structure.

Figure 4-6: Proposed section showing the concrete and steel framing plan for concourse levels.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 24
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

For the legacy mode it is planned to retain floors up to level 6. Therefore, it will be ideal to have
concrete structure up to level 6 and steel structure above level 6, which can be easily removed
for the legacy mode. Similar to the plaza level the framing plans up to level 6 is proposed as
one way RC slab of 275mm thick typically. The beams are spanning in one direction of size
900mm wide x 750mm deep in general. It is proposed to have a circular internal column of size
1000mm diameter typically.

The proposed 24 number of cores will be retained as it is as per the original design which will
be used for the lateral restraint of the stadium. The height of the cores is almost similar to the
original design and therefore the wall thicknesses and the steel reinforcement will remain the
same at this stage.

4.2.1 Expansion Joint

As per original design there will be 8 numbers of expansion joints dividing the building into 8
different buildings with double columns between the expansion joint.

4.3 Steel Superstructure

As explained above the VE proposal is for a steel-framed construction for part of Level 5 and 6
for the extended portion of building line from below and complete floor of Level 7 and above
because it is easily demountable for the legacy stage.

This proposal of steel superstructure is discussed in detail in section 17.2.

4.4 Concrete Substructure and Superstructure VE Summary:


 The concrete substructure VE option offers cost savings due to proportional reduction
in bowl area and further optimisation by raising the pitch level, rationalizing single
uniform basement around the pitch and by regularising the grids.
 The concrete superstructure VE option for Level 1 to 6 also offers cost savings due to
proportional reduction in bowl area and further optimisation of number of floors, grids by
which we can optimize the slab thickness, beam sizes, column sizes and all the steel
reinforcement ratios.
 The steel superstructure VE options for part of Level 5 and 6 and full floor of Level 7 and
8 is also offering cost savings due to proportional reduction in bowl area and further
optimisation by regularising the grid. This option is used mainly for legacy mode for
which if required, it can be easily demounted, dismantled and reused.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 25
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

5 VE of Plumbing and Code Compliance

5.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation

The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of Plumbing systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the original
design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and recommended
design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and that it meets
the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and performance.

5.2 Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of
alternate material

The potable cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-
DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design
report for the project.

In the original design, the potable cold water system is being fed from the potable water storage
tank. It supplies water to wash basins, ablution taps, sinks, showers, dishwashers, etc. Drinking
fountains shall be using bottled dispenser.

Figure 5-1: Potable Cold Water Distribution System in the Building

FIFA and SC Technical Recommendations and Requirements suggest the sustainable water
supply system and strategy on achieving an overall reduction in total water demand through the
specification of water efficient fittings & fixtures as summarized on the Stage – 1 Design Analysis
table as part of the report.

Although the original design appears to be generally in accordance with the code and FIFA &
SC requirements, options and methodologies shall be employed to reduce overall water
consumption in complete compliance with GSAS requirements.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 26
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for potable cold water system:
 Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, low flow fixtures, low flush
urinals/grey water treatment, water savings valves, automatic shut off valves, sensors,
etc.
 A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the potable water
demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described in
the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
 Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.

Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.

5.3 Non-Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection
of alternate material

The non-potable cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design
report for the project.

In the original design, the non-potable cold water system is being fed from the non-potable
storage tank. It supplies water to water closets, urinals, bib taps, etc. The original design
appears to be in accordance with the code.

Figure 5-2: Non-Potable Cold Water Distribution System in the Building

FIFA Technical Recommendations and Requirements suggest the sustainable water supply
system and strategy on achieving an overall reduction in total water demand through the

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 27
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

specification of water efficient fittings & fixtures as summarized on the Stage – 1 Design Analysis
table as part of the report.

SC requires the use of recycled waste water such as treated grey water and captured A/C
condensates as part of the GSAS sustainability requirement.

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for non-potable cold water
system:
 Options and methodologies to be employed to reduce overall water consumption in
complete compliance with GSAS requirements. This is to specify in detail the required
water efficient appliances, low flow fixtures, low flush urinals/grey water treatment, water
savings valves, automatic shut off valves, sensors, etc.
 A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the non-potable
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
 Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.

Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.

5.4 TSE Water Supply System for External Irrigation

The TSE water supply system is described under section 5.11 of Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.

In the original design, the TSE water supply system is being fed from ASHGHAL.

SC requires the use of TSE for external landscaping (Infrastructure scope of work).

In the VE design, it is recommended to use TSE water as a potential source of non-potable


water for the stadium for the purposes of WC and urinal flushing, pitch irrigation and suitable
wash down facilities (e.g. bib taps) and supply irrigation water to external landscaping (part of
Infra scope of work).

Conclusion - Based on the above recommendation, a 50% reduction in the overall water
consumption in the building can be achieved.

5.5 Hot water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate
material

The hot water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-DR-RF-AL-
7205 and described under section 5.11 of the Public Health schematic design report for the
project.

In the original design, the hot water system is being fed from potable storage tank. The hot
water system consists of local point - of - use direct electric generation or local hot water storage
calorifiers with associated local secondary return circulation systems. It is generally proposed
to provide hot water to EMIR, VVIP & VIP areas, dressing areas, hospitality box serveries,
kitchen areas, showers (where required) and any other areas deemed to require hot water. The
original design water heating load requirement is 530 kw.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 28
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-3: Electric Hot Water System in the Building

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for hot water system:
 Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, water savings valves, automatic
shut off valves, sensors, etc.
 A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the chilled cold
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
The new water heating load requirement is approximately 400 kw.
 Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.

Conclusion – The above opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.

5.6 Chilled Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of
alternate material

The chilled cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing DR-AL-01 – 7200 and
described under section 5.11 of the Public Health schematic design report for the project.

In the original design, chilled cold water system supplies water to selected end users within the
stadium. The provision of chilled water shall be through local generation of chilled water via
plate heat exchanger (PHX), chilled water storage vessel (semi-storage type) and secondary
return circulation pumping system. This will serve Emir, VVIP & VIP areas, dressing areas for
players/teams & pitch officials, music artist dressing, kitchen areas and other area deemed to
require chilled cold water supply requirement. The cold feed supply to the chilled cold water
system is fed from the potable water supply system. The load in district cooling system is 988
Kw.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 29
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-4: Chilled Cold Water Distribution System in the Building

SC requires the use of low water demand process cooling equipment (Closed circuit cooling
system).

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for chilled cold water system:
 Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, water savings valves, automatic
shut off valves, sensors, etc.
 A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the chilled cold
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
The new cooling load will be 790 Kw.
 Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.

Conclusion – The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.

5.7 Water Storage System – Additional Storage Required

The water storage system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-DR-
RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design report
for the project.

In the original design, the water storage system will consist of bulk potable & non-potable water
tanks and pitch irrigation water tank which will be generally of concrete construction. The
exception to this being for the dedicated potable & non-potable tanks serving the Emir suite,
condensate collection tanks and roof cleaning tanks which will be of sectional pre-insulated
GRP panel construction.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 30
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Bulk potable and non-potable water tanks will be fed from KHARAMAA main water network.
and will supply water to the stadium. The pitch irrigation water tank will receive source of water
from the non-potable water tank which is also designed to receive collected condensate water
from HVAC equipment in the building. The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and
international codes requirement.

Figure 5-5: Water Storage System in the Building

Based on the supplied information relating to precinct potable water demand per Qatar 2022
Supreme Committee report (Table 5), the total potable water indicated is 918 m3/day (1836 m3/
2 days). It is based on a population of 35,792 only with 60% potable and 40% non-potable.

Latest data received from the designer indicates an occupancy of 88,873 persons which is more
than double of the original design occupancy (35,792 persons). This big discrepancy between
the old and new occupancy requirement will impact the design for the water storage in the
project which will require 2,000 m3/day (4,000 m3/2 days). Refer to attached
tabulation/estimation (Table 5 -Precinct Mains Potable Water Demands) under Appendix A3 of
this validation report.

5.8 Domestic Water Booster Pump System – Reduction in equipment capacity

The domestic water booster pumping system is described under specification section
220000/20 and on design drawings for the project.

In the original design, booster pumps are being specified as packaged multi-stage pump type
units, each to include multi-stage inverter controlled quiet running variable speed pumps

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 31
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

(minimum duty, support & standby), inlet & outlet manifold headers, integral control panel &
isolator, accumulator vessel(s) & associated isolation valves, outlet pressure controls, low level
cut-out switches, flexible connections/anti-vibration mounts all to be mounted on a common skid
base frame. The power load requirement for the domestic water pumping system is 180 Kw.

Figure 5-6: Domestic Water Booster Pump System in the Building

SC requires water and power savings thru building operation of this equipment.

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for water supply system:
 Material type of booster pumps and pipe works involved to be reviewed if possible for
replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
 Capacities of booster pumps will definitely reduce due to a reduction in total built up area
from 212,328 to 118,218 m2 and removal of basement floors. The new power load
requirement will be 150 Kw

Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for 20% water/energy savings and contribute
for a material cost savings of 20 - 30% to the project if procured from cheaper alternate approved
manufacturer.

5.9 Pitch Irrigation System – Rainwater Collection & Usage

The pitch irrigation is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-DR-RF-AL-


7200.

In the original design, the pitch irrigation system is being fed from pitch irrigation bulk storage
tank.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 32
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-7: Pitch Irrigation System

In the VE design, it is recommended for the rain water to be captured and used for pitch irrigation
system, supply of water hose bibs for cleaning purposes and for external irrigation.

Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 10% water savings and contribute
towards meeting GSAS requirement.

5.10 Combined Building Drainage System – Change of Design to Twin System for
Grey Water Application

The combined drainage system is described under specification section 220000/35, design
report 5.11.1.4 and on design drawings for the project.

In the original design, the drainage system is comprising of the following:

Above ground combined drainage system: -


 Sanitary drains from WC, UR, WB, FD, SH, etc. which are connected to common drain
pipe & riser.
 Drains from concession/ kitchen which are connected to a separate riser but join the
sanitary drains at lower level.
 Combined drains discharge to external drainage network.

Below ground drainage (waste only) system: -


 Drains are collected into a pump station then pump out to external drainage network.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 33
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-8: Combined Building Drainage System

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities and design changes are proposed for drainage
system:
 The original design for drainage system will be revised with a single pipe system (Foul
+ waste) to be changed to twin pipe system in order to collect/separate all discharges
from wash basins, showers, floor drains and use as influent waste for grey water
treatment system for treatment and the product water (effluent) will be re-used for supply
of water to water closets, urinals, etc.
 To change gravity drains from metal/clay to UPVC.
 Performance capacities of sump pumps (approximately 20 sets) will reduce based on
the received stadium area reduction from 212,328 to 118,218 m2 and removal of
basement floors.

Conclusion - This will lead for a 40 % water savings and contribute towards GSAS sustainability
requirements. It will also contribute for a material cost savings of 20 - 30% to the project if
materials are to be procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers. But, this will add
cost for having a twin pipe system and grey water treatment plant which may offset savings for
cheaper materials as proposed above for drainage system.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 34
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

5.11 Grey Water System - Addition

The grey water system is described under section 5.11 of the Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.

Based on the schematic design report, under original design, further consideration has been
given for the use of grey water system in the project. But, design drawings have not shown this
system in the layout and schematics.

SC requires grey water capture from basins, showers, appliances for treatment and recycle for
non-potable water use.

In the VE design, Grey Water Treatment system will be considered as part of GSAS requirement
to treat waste water and the product to be re-used for supply of water to water closets, urinals,
etc.

Figure 5-9: Grey Water System

Conclusion - The above requirement will lead for a 40% water savings and contribute towards
GSAS sustainability requirements. But, this will add cost for having a grey water treatment plant
which may offset savings for water consumptions and cheaper materials as proposed above for
drainage system.

5.12 Condensate Recycling - Reduction in Capacity due to Cooling Load Reduction

The condensate recycling system is described under specification section 220000/22 and on
design drawings for the project.

In the original design, condensate discharge from mechanical AHUs and FCUs will be captured
into satellite condensate storage tanks, then brought to the non-potable water tank, pass thru
treatment system for recycling and used for pitch irrigation and flushing of WCs and urinals.
There are 20 sets of satellite condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets.
The total power requirement for this system is 15 kw.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 35
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-10: Condensate Recycling System

SC requires to capture air conditioning condensate for recycling.

In the VE design, satellite condensate water storage tanks and booster pumps will reduce in
quantities and capacities due to estimated HVAC cooling load reduction of 50% from the original
design and reduction in built up area as proposed by Architectural. There will be 20 sets of
satellite condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets. The total power
requirement for this system will be approximately 10 kw.

Conclusion - The above requirement will lead for a material cost savings of approximately 40%
to the project and plant space savings.

5.13 Rain Water Drainage System-Reduction due to Reduced Roof Area

The rain water drainage system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-
DR-RF-AL-72001 and described under section 5.11 of the Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.

In the original design, the roof is divided to North & South stands. Each stand has 3 nos. of 900
diameter vertical pipe. Rain water outlets(RWO) are tapered and connected to 600 diameter
individual downspout which will be discharged to external drainage network.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 36
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-11: Rain Water Drainage System

SC requires rain water to be captured for irrigation purposes.

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed and considered for rain water
drainage system:
 Rain water to be captured, filtered and reused for irrigation and flushing of WCs & urinals
as per SC requirement and schematic diagram below.

 Sizes of roof drains (6 nos. - North & South stands) and downpipes (6 nos.- North &
South stands) will reduce from 600 to 500 mm, diameter based on the VE proposed
reduced roof area for the stadium of approximately 10%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 37
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion - Based on the above recommendations, 20 - 30% material cost reduction can be
achieved due to reduced stadium roof area and if materials are to be procured from cheaper
alternate approved manufacturers.

5.14 Roof Cleaning System – Reduction in Equipment Capacity and Selection of


Alternate Material

The roof cleaning system is described under project specification section 220000/21 – 1.4.4.

In the original design, a provision has been included for roof cleaning/wash down purposes in
the form of dedicated local break tanks and associated pump sets which will serve numbers of
hose reel points within each quadrant at roof level. These will be supplied from the non-potable
water system.

Figure 5-12: Roof Cleaning System

In the VE design, sizes of tanks and pump sets will reduce based on the VE proposed reduced
roof area for the stadium which will lead for a 20-30 % material cost reduction and if materials
are to be procured from alternate manufacturers.

Conclusion - Based on the above recommendations, 20 - 30% material cost reduction can be
achieved due to reduced stadium roof area and if materials are to be procured from cheaper
alternate approved manufacturers.

5.15 Leak Detection System – Water and Energy Savings

The leak detection system is described under section 5.10.9 (Public Health) of the Schematic
design report for the project.

In the original design, the leak detection system is generally described to be provided for
incoming water line, tanks and wet areas.

SC requires provision of water leak detection system in the project.

In the VE design, leak extensive detection system will be employed to quickly locate and
efficiently identify water leakage points per GSAS requirement.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 38
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-13: Leak Detection System

Conclusion - Unnecessary water leakages can be avoided which will lead for a reduced water
consumption of 30% and energy savings of 20%. But, extensive leak detection system design
for storage tanks, pipe line distributions, etc. as required per GSAS will add cost to the project.

5.16 Metering and Sub-metering system - Water and Energy Savings

Metering and sub-metering system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under specification section 220000 (Public Health General
Requirements), 1.4.21.

In the original design, provision of meters and sub-meters are required in the water services
installations:
 Incoming potable water mains to measure overall consumption within the building
 Inlet supplies to each of the main tanks to measure overall potable/non-potable/irrigation
consumption to each tank
 Boosted supplies on the potable and non-potable distribution system serving the building
to measure overall consumption by each of these two (2) systems
 Condensate return lines to measure how much water collected from recycled
condensate
 Main risers to identify usage around the building
 Chilled cold water of the cold feed supplies to each local chilled water storage vessel
and heat exchange station
 Hot water of the cold feed supplies to each local hot water calorifier station
 Main Kitchen all main water services supplies

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 39
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-14: Metering and Sub-metering System

SC requires the provision of water metering system as one of the GSAS criteria address aspects
related to Water.

Conclusion - Based on the above requirements, this will lead for a reduced water consumption
in the building and help to achieve GSAS 4star rating requirement. This item will have no cost
impact implication.

5.17 Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System – Water and Energy Savings

The sanitary area shut off valve system is described under specification section 220000/29 for
the project.

In the original design, automatic shut off valves shall be provided on all water supplies to
spectator toilet areas - linked to passive infrared type presence detection as part of leak
detection system.

This requirement has to be adopted for the following reasons:


 A water conservation measure to prevent unintended wastage of water when the toilet
area is not in used or is unattended – such as result from fault with the tap or WC/Urinal
flush valve remaining in the open position
 Minimizing the risk of flooding caused by the above and/or blockage within the
associated drainage installation or malicious damage

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 40
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5-15: Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System

In the VE design, it is recommended to review the material type of all plumbing materials and
equipment involved in the project if possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable
products.

Conclusion - This will contribute for a material cost savings of 20-30 %, reduced water
consumption of 30% and energy savings of 20%.

5.18 Internal Pipework – Selection of Alternate Material

Internal pipework installations are described under specification section 220000/26, 1.4.11 for
the project

In the original design, the following pipework installations are proposed:


 Incoming water supply (up to 300 mm) from municipality to be made of stainless steel
(BS EN 10312).
 Ring main distribution (up to 300) to be made of stainless steel (BS EN 10312).
 Main riser & sub-branches (up to 159) to be made of copper.
 Recycled AHU Condensate transfer mains back to non-potable tank (up to 108) to be
made of copper.

The above installations are required to comply with QCS and Kahramaa standards.

In the VE design, material types for pipework installations have to be reviewed if possible for
replacement with cheaper but approvable types.

Conclusion - By using another type of pipe line material and alternate manufacturers, the cost
can be reduced by 20-30%.

5.19 Building Management System(BMS) - Water and Energy Savings

Building Management System is described under section 5.10.9 (Public Health) of the
Schematic design report for the project.

In the original design, BMS will provide automatic control and monitoring of public health
systems equipment. It will be capable of interfacing with systems/equipment utilising industry
standard protocols including BACnet, CANbus, DALI, KNX and other industry related standards.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 41
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the VE design, material required for automatic control and monitoring systems of all public
health equipment have to be reviewed if possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable
types to contribute for a project cost savings.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers, the cost can be reduced by 20-30%.

5.20 GSAS Compliance Requirements

GSAS compliance requirements are described under specification section 220000/15, 1.2 for
the project.

In the original design, the following systems are not considered or shown in the schematic
design drawings which are points to achieve GSAS 4star rating for the project.
 Grey Water Collection and Treatment System.
 Rain water capturing for pitch irrigation system.
 TSE supply to pitch irrigation and irrigation to external landscaping.

SC requires to utilize GSAS AND LEED criteria.

In the VE design, the following systems are proposed to be part of design per GSAS
sustainability requirement for the project.
 Rain Water Capture for pitch irrigation
 TSE supply to pitch and external irrigation (Infra scope)
 Potable/Non-Potable Water System with water efficient fixtures and appliances
 Water Use sub-metering

5.21 Approved Vendors’ List

In the original design, there is an Issued Tender Approved Vendors’ list for the project.

In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed:


 To source for alternative vendors.
 Research for alternative products (Chinese, Indian, East European) which have lower
costs but of good and equal quality.
 Update or prepare a new vendors’ list based on the above requirement.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 42
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

6 VE of Fire Protection and Code Compliance

6.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation

The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of fire protection systems
as described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the
original design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and
recommended design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and
NFPA that it meets the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and
performance.

6.2 Fire water pumps – Reduction

In original design, the proposed of Fire water pumps designed exceed the NFPA and QCD
requirements. Capacity shown as following:

SP-01&02 = 197kg/s (3000gpm)-Electrical sprinklers fire pumps.

Sp-03 = 197kg/s (3000gpm)-Diesel sprinklers fire pumps.

HY01 & HY 02 = 72kg/s (1200gpm) = Electrical main fire water pump

HY03 = 142kg/s (2250 gpm) = Diesel main fire water pump

Per original design, two sets of fire pumps: one for sprinklers and second for standpipe are
provided in the fire pump room, which is not required by NFPA and QCD.

The original design is exceeding the NFPA and QCD requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme
committee have recommended the design exceed QCD requirements.

Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to be combined the sprinklers, standpipe,


(class 3) and external fire hydrants with one set of fire pumps. The capacity of fire pumps should
be as per hydraulic calculations and can be 1250gpm per NFPA-13 &14.

The proposed design can reduce the cost by 40%.

6.3 Fire water tanks- Reduction

Per original design, the proposed of concrete fire water storage tank is designed for 2 hours’
duration.

The original design is exceeding the NFPA and QCD requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme
committee have recommended the design exceed QCD requirements.

Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to design the storage fire water tank for 1
hour instead of 2 hours.

The proposed design can reduce the cost by 40%.

6.4 Generator and fuel tank room– Replace Foam (deluge) with extra hazard
sprinkler system

Per original design, the proposed of generator and fuel tank rooms are designed for Foam
system for areas with flammable liquid.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 43
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The original design is accepted per NFPA and QCD requirements.

Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to use alternative fire protection system for
the generator and fuel tank rooms by standard response sprinklers with density 0.4 gpm/ft² over
2000 ft² (Extra hazard- Group-2) with the separate zone control valve instead of deluge system.
The proposed design is code compliant (NFPA and QCD).

Since there is no Foam (deluge) system used in the generator and fuel tank rooms (with total
numbers 4 rooms.) the cost can be reduced by 60-70%.

6.5 Fire water distribution system for branch fire pipes materials– Replace with
alternative material

In the original design, automatic wet pipe distribution system is designed by using steel pipes
with groove ends.

The original design is accepted by NFPA and QCD requirements.

Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to use alternative type of fire protection pipes
except MAIN RISERS pipes, ASTM A52 galvanized steel ERW for branch pipes. The proposed
design is code compliant (NFPA and QCD).

Using ASTM A52 galvanized steel ERW for the branches fire pipes the cost can be reduced
by 25-30%.

6.6 Approved Vendor’s List – use alternative QCD approved venders

It is proposed to use USA / Japan/ UK brands specified - Alternate manufacturers from Europe
/ Asia to be considered.

In the VE design, it is recommended to use alternative vendors. Research Alternative products


(Chinese, Indian, East European) which have lower cost but of good quality and should be
approved by QCD.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-30%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 44
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

7 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

7.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation

The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of HVAC systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the original
design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and recommended
design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and that it meets
the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and performance.

7.2 Cooling and Air flow rates reduction

7.2.1 Tournament Mode - Cooling Load Reduction

The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 130 MW based on the CFD modelling which is based on outside air condition dry bulb
temperature of 36.8 Degree C and Wet bulb temperature of 33.4 Degree C.

With reference to SC document no Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-REP-0863 Future Climate Design


Data for 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar during winter full stadium, the Cooling load for this project
will be based on winter conditions. The suggested cooling load will be approximately 95 MW,
based on the outside air condition dry Bulb temperature MCDB of 30.4 Degree C, WBT of 27.0
Degree C.

Based on the proposed new CFD analysis the cooling load will be further reduced to followings:
 VE option -01: The cooling load capacity will be 72.0 MW which includes cooling of all
tiers (CFD result).
 VE option -02: The cooling load capacity will be 60.0 MW which doesn’t include cooling
of upper tiers (CFD result).

Conclusion: VE option -02 will be considered based on the CFD model results shown in the
section 11 VE of CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance and Appendix – A
section A-10. The cooling load capacity are calculated based on winter condition outside air
temperature 30.4 Degree C DB and 27.0 Degree C WB. A details calculation sheet is attached
in the appendix – A, section A – 5.

7.2.2 Tier Cooling - Air Flow Rates reduction

The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows the flow rate of 25 L/s for each spectator seat.

With reference to SC comments, Bowl Cooling: under seat air distribution is sized for 25 l/s per
seat: sidewall adjustable air grills mounted in the seating riser are typically limited to 9.5 l/s
each. These criteria are based on:
 consideration of how close the under seat diffusers are to people
 trying to avoid drafts on people's legs
 the limited availability of diffusers that are specifically designed for under seat
applications

The original design is based on summer condition. 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in
some area due to over design conditions. The design checks indicate based on winter condition,
we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas. The CFD model will be based on the
10 L/s per person for lower tier, 20 L/s per person for mid-tier and no cooling for upper tier.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 45
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion: The original design air flow rates is 2297.125 M3/s for the tiers (Lower, Mid &
Upper). The CFD modelling verification of the original design (Summer conditions) confirm that
the stadium is over designed and over cooled. Based on the winter condition, a VE opportunity
to reduce the air flow rates 354.380 M3/s, which is 84 % reduction on air flow rates fir tiers. Due
to the reduction in air flow rates, the air handling unit’s will also reduce in quantity. (Refer the
section 10 CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance for the complete CFD
report). The detailed air flow rates calculation data sheet is attached in the appendix – A, section
A – 5.

7.3 Smoke Managements

7.3.1 Concourse levels – Smoke Extract Fans Reduction

With reference to the document no SC-C01-CAF-FOS-REP-FP-00026_RevT1 - Fire Strategy


Report, Page no 42, Clause no 2.2.2.2 Fire within a Concourse, the smoke control system is
designed to accommodate limited fire load, such as small waste bins and small sales kiosks,
which could result in a fire. The client has requested that the smoke control systems to be sized
for a conservative design fire size of up to 5 MW, or smaller where sprinklers will be effective.

The proposed area for the new concourse (173000 M2) will be lesser then original design
(222000 M2) and also floor levels have been reduced. This will reduce the smoke management
zones on the original design by 16 Nos.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete 16 Nos. smoke extract fans for the concourse levels.

7.3.2 Fire within the roof void – Smoke Extract Fan Deletion

With reference to the document no SC-C01-CAF-FOS-REP-FP-00026_RevT1 - Fire Strategy


Report, Page no 42, Clause no 2.2.2.3, 4th Para, fire within the Roof Void, It is expected that in
the event of a small fire in the roof void, smoke will dissipate to the outside via the open
perimeter edges, such that the conditions within the roof void remain tenable. Page no 294,
Figure no 13. shows the smoke extract fans provision for the roof void.

The smoke extract fans provided on the roof void are not required. 50 % opening in the roof
void should be adequate for smoke removal as per QCDD requirements.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete all smoke extract fans for the roof void.

7.4 HVAC Equipment

7.4.1 Plate heat exchangers - Reduction

The energy transfer station (ETS) equipment are selected for 180 MW capacity (2 sets 90 MW,
each sets consisting of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) shown on the ARUP report Document no
TDO-16-TTC-0018 in the mechanical specification section, no 220000 / 29.

With reference to SC document no Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-REP-0863 Future Climate Design


Data for 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar during winter full stadium, the Cooling load for this project
will be based on winter conditions.

The cooling will reduce drastically for this project based on winter conditions. The PHEX
equipment's will be sized based on the 60.0MW cooling capacity.

Conclusion: The PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment will be sized based on the proposed
new CFD analyses. The revised plate heat exchanger will be sized for 60 MW (2 sets 30.0 MW,

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 46
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

each sets consistent of 4 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby). A details calculation sheet is attached in
the appendix – A, section A – 5.

7.4.2 Chilled Water Pumps - Reduction

The chilled water pumps are selected for 180 MW capacity (2 sets 90 MW, each sets consisting
of 16 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) shown on the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018.
in the mechanical specification section, no 220000 / 29.

With reference to SC document no Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-REP-0863 Future Climate Design


Data for 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar during winter full stadium, the Cooling load for this project
will be based on winter conditions.

The cooling will reduce drastically for this project based on winter conditions. The chilled water
pumps will be sized based on the 60.0MW cooling capacity.

Conclusion: The chilled water pumps will be sized based on the proposed new CFD analyses.
The revised chilled water pumps will be sized for 60 MW (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent
of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) A details calculation sheet is attached in the appendix – A,
section A – 5.

7.4.3 Air Handling Units for Tiers – Reduction

The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 130 MW. Bowl air handling unit quantities (553 Nos.) shown on the mechanical
schematic drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7126 are selected based on the CFD
modelling which is based on outside air condition dry bulb temperature of 36.8 Degree C and
Wet bulb temperature of 33.4 Degree C.

With reference to SC document no SC-ACV-ETR-QSC-STR-00002 Considerations for Stadium


Bowl Cooling Strategy.

The new cooling load capacity for the bowl will be 35.0 MW only. (Refer the section 10 CFD
Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance for the complete CFD report)

Based on the revised cooling load capacity from the CFD results. The number of AHU's will be
reduced to approximately 200 Nos. for tier cooling as follows:

AHU's for Field of Play (FOP) = 10 Nos.

AHU's for Tier -01 = 100 Nos.

AHU's for Mid-Tier (VVIP & Sky Box) = 40 Nos.

AHU's for Mid Perimeter = 50 Nos

Conclusion: A VE opportunity to reduce the air handling units to 353 Nos. The 65 % percentage
of cooling reduction in the revised CFD model result. A details calculation sheet is attached in
the appendix – A, section A – 07.

7.4.4 Air Handling Units - Cross plate heat exchanger - Replacement

Cross plate heat exchanger on the air handling units is shown in the mechanical drawing no
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7132.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 47
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Cross plate heat exchanger will be replaced with Thermal Heat Recovery wheel to save the
space and cost. Using thermal heat recovery wheel will have better thermal heat performance
due to latent and sensible heat recovery.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to save AHU cost and space by replacing the cross plate heat
exchanges to thermal recovery wheel on the air handling units.

7.4.5 Air Handling Units - Sound Attenuator - Relocation

Inbuilt sound attenuator is shown in the mechanical drawing no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-


7132.

Having sound attenuator on the AHU section will add more cost to the air handling units.

Conclusion: Sound attenuator section in the AHUs should be deleted. This will reduce cost and
also plant space for the air handling units. The sound attenuators will be in provided in the
supply and return air ducts

7.4.6 Fan Coil Units - Air Conditioning for Toilet areas - Deletion

Cooling the toilets via fan coil units are shown in the mechanical drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-ME-PL-04-7153

Fan coil units are not required for the toilets. The exhaust ventilation air make-up will be supplied
from the adjacent space / treated fresh air to provide required comfort.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete the fan coil units provided for toilet areas.

7.4.7 Stairwell Pressurization fans – Quantity - Relocation

Two sets of stairwell pressurization fans (1 duty + 1 standby x 2 Nos) are provided in each stair
well on the mechanical drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203.

2 sets of stairwell pressurization fans are not required per NFPA / QCDD requirements.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to have only 1 no. (duty only) for staircase pressurization fans
for each stair well.

7.4.8 Stairwell Pressurization fans – Standby Deletion

Standby fans / motors for the stairwell pressurization system shown on the mechanical drawings
no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 are not required as per QCDD.

The staircase pressurization fans will be provided 1 no duty with standby power back.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete the standby fans.

7.4.9 Fire & Smoke System - Sound Attenuator Deletion

Sound attenuators provided for the smoke management system shown on the mechanical
drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 are not required.

The smoke management system doesn’t require sound attenuators.

Conclusion A VE opportunity is to delete the sound attenuators from the smoke management
system.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 48
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

7.4.10 Smoke Stop Lobbies - Exhaust Fans Deletion

Smoke stop lobbies require only pressurization system shown on the mechanical drawings no
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 and not the exhaust system.

The smoke stop lobbies will be provided with pressurization fan only as per QCDD
requirements.

Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete the exhaust fans on the smoke stop lobbies.

7.5 Mechanical Plant Spaces

7.5.1 All Mechanical Plant Rooms – Space Reduction

All mechanical plant spaces are indicated on the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
and also on the all mechanical drawings.

With reference to SC document no Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-REP-0863 Future Climate Design


Data for 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar during winter full stadium, the Cooling load for this project
will be based on winter conditions

Based on the VE option - 2 CFD model report. The Cooling load for this project will be based
on winter conditions. The cooling load capacity was drastically reduced from 180.0 MW to 60.0
MW.

Conclusion: All the mechanical plant space (ETS room, AHU room etc.) will be reduced based
on winter condition for 60.0 MW cooling capacity. A detailed HVAC system plant spaces (Based
on original and VE option design) data sheet is attached on the appendix – A, section A – 05.

7.5.2 Seat Air Distribution for Spectator areas – Air Plenum and Air Outlet Reduction

The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows the flow rate is 25 L/s for each spectator seat.

With reference to SC commends, Bowl Cooling: under seat air distribution is sized for 25 l/s per
seat: sidewall adjustable air grills mounted in the seating riser are typically limited to 9.5 l/s each
these criteria is based on:
 consideration of how close the under seat diffusers are to people
 trying to avoid drafts on people's legs
 the limited availability of diffusers that are specifically designed for under seat
applications

The original design is based on summer condition. 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in
some area due to over design conditions. The design checks indicate based on winter condition,
we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas. The CFD model will be based on the
10 L/s per person for lower tier, mid-tier 20 L/s per person and no cooling for upper tier. A
detailed HVAC system plant spaces (Based on original and VE option design) data sheet is
attached on the appendix – A, section A – 05.

Conclusion: Based on the CFD modelling verification. The displacement air plenum and grilles
is no more required for the upper tier, for the lower (10 L/s) and mid (20 L/s) tiers displacement
plenum and air grilles will be re-reduced to suit the new CFD model results.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 49
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

8 VE of Mechanical/Equipment Engineering and Code Compliance

Details included in the section - 07 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 50
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

9 VE of Landscape and External Works and Code Compliance

9.1 Introduction

The primary input by KEO landscape architects during Stage 4 defining the impacts of the
architectural and structural modifications to the vessel on the landscape proposals. The
principle modification that impacted the landscape included the architectural levels, consequent
impacts on access to and around the ‘Vessel’, and changes to surface water proposals.

The general principles behind the VE approach to the landscape and externa works has sought
to achieve the following:
 Optimum value engineering opportunities
 Compliance with ‘FIFA Football Stadiums, Technical-recommendation and-
requirements; 5th-Edition’
 Compliance with Supreme Committee Crowd Movement Standards, Doc Ref. Q22M-
APW-CMN-PMC-STD-0660
 Optimum horizontal integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay: tying in with
proposed uses, functions and characters
 Optimum vertical integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay: tying in with existing
levels, whilst ensuring a tolerance for some degree of variance of proposed levels along
the site boundary
 Legacy opportunities are optimised

9.2 Methodology

KEO landscape architects have coordinated with crowd movement specialists, security
specialists, infrastructure engineers and architects to ensure that the VE options relating to their
specialisms have been reviewed against the landscape proposals, and further VE opportunities
identified and explored. For example:
 Surface water drainage
 Vehicular security measures
 Levels and grading opportunities

Additional VE options were investigation to look at reductions in extents of paving and lighting.
Materials were also reviewed to reduce cost without compromising performance or character.

9.3 Landscape Layout

9.3.1 Access & Circulation

The crowd modelling undertaken for the current design is based on obstacle-free landscape
(i.e. no structures or planting) and indicates potential pinch-points at the top and bottom of the
sloped access routes that would be at the higher range of the ideal level of service, LoS D
(1person/m²).

KEO have developed architectural solutions, as part of the value engineering process, to reduce
or negate the cost of the penetrating the ground water level. This has resulted in the whole
structure to be raised, increasing the concourse level 4m from +8m QND to 12m. This has had
a significant impact on the access and circulation, requiring alternative design solutions as
detailed in Section 18 ‘VE of Crowd Modelling’. Two options were tested to find the most cost
effective compliant VE option.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 51
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

9.3.2 Recommended Vertical Access -Stairs with Sloped Access Routes

The option for stairs with sloped access routes takes account of the increased concourse level
of +12m and derived from an approach that prioritises the following:
 Construction cost
 Improved pedestrian circulation and peak flows (refer to Section 18.3.5, ‘Option 1
analysis’)
 Integration with the Tournament Precinct Overlay
 Tolerance within the design for future changes in proposed grade levels and concourse
levels, i.e. vertical integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay
 Optimising Legacy opportunities

The recommended is the preferred option because of the reduced construction cost compared
to numerous sloped access routes, and because of the improved pedestrian circulation.

Figure 9-1: Recommended Vertical Access Solution

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 52
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 9-2: Integrating between 3700m³ - 5000m³ of SW around stadium

The reduced mass, or footprint of the stairs allows for better circulation and, therefore integration
with the overlay. Another significant benefit, as detailed in Section 18.3.4.2 and 18.3.5, is that
the steps allow for greater flexibility in terms of level variance between concourse and precinct
level: the flight may be increased or decreased as required with minimal impact on the of fill
material. The premise of this approach, therefore, is to allow for a design that is not dependent
on, or necessitate works, at, along or beyond the site boundary circulation.

Figure 9-3: Alternative location for wadi necklace indicating opportunity for accepting Legacy stage spoil
for precinct-wide development

Consideration has been given to the stairs during Base Build and Tournament phases. In this
scenario, the stairs would be dismantled, the engineered depressions or rawdat/wadi (refer to
Section 9.5) would be retained, and the void beneath the stairs would be infilled with spoil arising
from Legacy-stage precinct-wide development to create a vegetated sloped park around the
former stadium, with winding and ascending network of pathways that connect the grade level
to the upper plaza.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 53
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 9-4: Precedent image for potential Legacy intervention

9.3.3 Alternative Solutions - Sloped Access Routes

This option is an extension of the current design, but is adjusted to account of the increased
height of the concourse level. As detailed in Section 19.3.6, this option requires additiondesign
input to improve at-grade circulation and minimise mean density on the concourse/ plaza.

One of main disadvantages of this option is that it is dependent on raising the levels at certain
points along the north east and southern boundaries: with a fixed level of +12m, and slope
gradient of 1:21 (with landings), the sloped routes become excessively and prohibitively long if
the rise exceed more than 4m approx.

Figure 9-5: Alternative solution of sloped access routes only

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 54
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Level or sloped access is not possible in original design because the level difference between
the existing levels and the current design level at this point is 2.15m approx. It is assumed that
the current design is dependent on significant grading works beyond project boundary.

The exiting level at the middle


point along the north boundary
is 5.25m approx. This is the
'Hospitality’ access point, and
should therefore allow for level
or sloped pedestrian access.

This solution requires the


boundary level to be raised by
0.75m to ensure level access. It
would comprise 1:50 falls

Figure 9-6: North boundary showing existing level of 5.25 and


proposed level of +6.0m min.

The existing level at the middle


point along the east boundary
is 6.25m approx. This is the
primary access for approx.
75% of spectators. The original
design proposes a level of
5.50m at this point, requiring a
minimum of 0.75m of
excavation. However, the
+6.25m level does not take
account of an existing
topographical feature: this area
forms part of a small
depression. To the east, south,
south-west the land rises 1m to
approx. 7.25m.
Figure 9-7: Eastern boundary showing existing level of 6.25m and
proposed level of 7.50 min The proposed solution is to
work to the wider mean level of
7.25m and not the localised level boundary level of +6.25. This would require 1.5m of infill, and
coordination with stakeholders to ensure appropriate tie-ins.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 55
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

As with the eastern boundary,


a localised low point at the
middle point along the
southern boundary means that
to design to an anomalous low
point would require below-
ground positive drainage.

The objective is to obviate the


need for conventional drainage
systems and achieve cost-
efficient SuDs solutions

The proposed solution is to


work to the wider existing
mean level of 7.40, thereby
raising the level by 0.9m at this
Figure 9-8: Southern boundary showing existing level of 6.25m and
location to marry to levels
proposed level of 7.50 min along the southern boundary.

Variations of the Sloped


Access route solution are provided and analysed in Section 18.3.6.2.

9.4 Levels and Grading

The recommended vertical access solution mitigates the requirement for the grading on or
beyond the site boundary. The alternative solution, comprising sloped access only, is dependent
on significant infill and grading to raise the existing levels. However, this is based on maximum
gradient of 1:50.

It may be feasible to review the design at a later date to increase the gradient of endfalls to a
maximum of 1:21 (with landings) in order to reduce the required infill volumes. However, it
should be noted that such opportunities will be limited to areas where there is no cross-flow of
pedestrian traffic: 1:21 applies to endfalls only, whereas applies to 1:50 crossfalls.

9.5 Sustainable Drainage Systems

Coordination with Infrastructure engineers has raised the opportunity of omitting sub-surface
attenuation tanks for stadium surface water run-off. As the precedent image below indicates,
the appreciation of the advantages of engineered depressions for flood water attenuation is
well-established. These formalised wadi, or rawdat, appear like sunken gardens during dry
periods, but becomes sacrificial attenuation or infiltrations basins during rain events.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 56
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 9-9: Wadi Al Azeiba, Oman, Designed by Atelier Jacqueline Osty

Initial calulations indicate that the open space around the stadium can easily accommodate the
SW volumes.

9.6 Hardscape

The masterplan, and report generally, does not convey the development of the open space
hierarchy, from primary peak-flow pedestrian routes to quiet/ornamental spaces. i.e. zoning
analysis of the open space, the purpose of each space, how it functions, should be included to
convey the efficiency of the design in terms of wayfinding, pedestrian movement. There appear
to be references on the landscape masterplan to secondary pedestrian routes to, from and
between the garden areas. These paving areas could be reduced to reduce cost and improve
site legibility.

'Gardens', or planting areas, are meant to be located away from the main routes. This may need
to be reviewed in coordination with the crowd modelling analysis to ensure pedestrian flows are
not obstructed but are still shaded.
Landscape Components

9.6.1 Lighting

No evidence of lighting analysis being carried out to ascertain the visual effect of low-level
bollards and uplighters. It may be that the above will be lost in the light spillage from the stadium
and therefore ineffectual / redundant.

LED lighting is not a requirement and conventional lighting could be used.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 57
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

9.6.2 Paving Materials

Original design shows site-wide resin-bound gravel on a rigid paving system with some small
coverage of crystal white granite, again over a rigid sub-base. Although the sub-base is not
specified, a rigid sub-base of 150mm depth reinforced concrete is a typical approach to a high-
end finish. The extent of coverage, material and sub-base specs has been reviewed and the
following recommendations are provided:
 Omit resin-bound surface
 Omit granite pavers
 Retain concrete sub-base and propose to this as surface course exposed aggregate:
exposed aggregates, e.g. seashells, locally sourced snail shells to convey the local
traditions relating to snail dye manufacture

Figure 9-10: Seashell exposed aggregate concrete expressing the tradition for small snail shells as

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 58
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 9-11: Natural formation of sea snail shells found in Purple Island, Qatar, could be used as precedent
for a hand-cast or sown top-dressing for an in-situ concrete surface.

9.6.3 Irrigation network availability

Sprinkler and sub- surface systems are specified. Sprinkler irrigation system is a FIFA
requirement. Subsurface irrigation in not a mandatory FIFA requirement but an SC requirement.

Specifying an artificial turf will eliminate the need to have dual system for irrigation. Actually,
there would not be a need for irrigation systems. Quick coupling valves for cooling and cleaning
purposes will be required. 24.820 m3 of irrigation water will be saved yearly. Construction cost
will be relatively higher.

9.6.4 Hydra zoning

The softscape strategy has provided an efficient design in terms of irrigation loading,
procurement and aesthetic quality. However, it is recommended that further review of
hydrozoning is undertaken; of native species and how they are grouped to attain optimum
efficiency regarding irrigation.

9.7 Landscape Signage and Wayfinding

The wayfinding strategy and proposed program in Documents SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-


00014 (rev T0) and C01-FOS-D-STA-T-WS is comprehensive and sensitive to the compliances
of the Supreme Committee, FIFA Technical Requirements and Doha Public Realm. The system
is largely efficient as a means for navigation and destination identification as well as an
appropriate design aesthetic for the event and legacy. Considerations given to the temporary
and legacy uses are considered and neither over ambitious nor inefficient.

Cost reduction measures in this case must be largely associated with considerations to an
overall reduction in quantity, fabrication methods and materials. These cost saving measures
come at risk of decreased opportunities for users to reinforce their site orientation and decisions
points, item lifespan reduction and durability.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 59
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10 VE of Civil Infrastructure, Roads and Utilities and Code Compliance

10.1 Introduction

This section of the report presents the outcome of the Value Engineering (VE) Exercise of the
Infrastructures sections following the activities in order noted below:
 Design Analysis of the Schematic Design Proposal
 Identifying VE opportunities
 Considering them during VE workshops and coordination with other design disciplines
 Undertaking their validation.

Value engineering considerations for individual infrastructures items is presented concluding


with a list of VE items and their quantities.

Besides reporting the VE Exercise, this report also touches upon review Traffic Impact Study
(TIS) and further work required during D&B. A section on Environmental and Waste
Management compliances during D&B is also provided.

Legacy Mode implications have been discussed at the end. It is to be noted that the Legacy
Mode requirements were kept in mind in defining potential VE opportunity and validating them.

10.1.1 Understanding the scope of works for Infrastructures

A confusion arose at the onset of the VE exercise in understanding the scope of works coverage
for Infrastructures in the Precinct (outside the project site), which is discussed below. The
discussed are intended to present extracts from the RFS with intention to ensure that scope is
covered as desired by Supreme Committee (SC) through its Tender Documents.
 In Tender Document D2.1, Annexure 5, Scope Demarcation is provided in Drawing Ref.
– C01-FOS-D-STA-T-MP-AL-AZ-4003. An extract from the drawing is shown below:

Please note the “Stadium area” clearly defined as “The Site”, which implies the construction site
to be limited largely within the stadium construction area. This implies that the construction of
Precinct layout is to be under a separate contract package.
 The project site is identified in Document D2.1, Section 4.1, in a diagram which is
extracted below. The blue boundary is mentioned as project site.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 60
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 Section 2 of Document D2.1, mentions that the Precinct Overlay functionality (outside
the stadium) is the planning of the precinct to accommodate the event overlay only,
which will be temporary arrangement. It also mentions that the Overlay construction will
begin in December 2019 at which time, the contractor will have limited availability of the
Precinct. This implies that the works in Precinct will be by others.

Considering the above notes from the RFS, the VE exercise considers, works in the precinct
development for event overlay to be beyond the scope for the D&B. However, note should be
taken of Section 1.6 of Technical Brief Document D2.5. The extract is provided below. It clarifies
that the scope for D&B contractor does stand for utilities connections outside the Project
Boundary:

Technical Addendum No. 2. Appendix E clarifies this further:

Upon the basis discussed above, the Infrastructure VE covers for:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 61
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 VE for all infrastructure elements inside the Project Boundary (Stadium area)
 VE for utilities connections only outside the project boundary (Precinct area)

10.1.2 Source of Information

Following documents have been mainly consulted for information to carry out the VE exercise:
 Section 4.19 of Schematic Design Report (Document D2.2). This serves the key source
of information for Civil Engineering Design.
 The following available drawing sets:

o Civil Drawings for Precinct (Document D4.11)


o Civil Drawings for Stadium (TD Part 10 for PDF drawings and their relevant CAD
drawings in TD Part 7)
 Appendix E, Technical Addendum No. 2- Utility Scope Clarifications as Tender Doc Part
13
 Document D2.1, Section 2, pertaining to Legacy mode requirements:

10.1.3 Code compliance

Infrastructures design elements will start 1.5m away from stadium building line i.e. the
connection points, demands and discharge volumes will be provided by MEP designers for the
stadium and the infrastructure design elements will tie-in at those connection points. The MEP
inputs will have considered the relevant FIFA code compliance inside the stadium. As far as VE
for Infrastructure design is concerned, compliance with QCS 2014 has been considered, as
appropriate.

10.2 Overview of the Infrastructure works

10.2.1 Utilities Connections

Extracts from Drawing ref C01-FOS-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ-1510 and C01-FOS-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-


AZ-1510 are presented below for an overview of the utilities connections involved in the project
site (Stadium) and Precinct area respectively:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 62
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Infrastructures work inside Project Boundary

Infrastructures work inside Precinct Boundary

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 63
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.2.2 Road connections

Extracts from Drawing ref C01-FOS-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- 3005 for the road connections:

Road works inside Project Boundary

Road works inside Precinct Boundary

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 64
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Road works inside the Project boundary is considered; the Precinct is considered beyond the
D&B scope. TIS report provided as part of Tender package (Document D4.12) has been studied
by Traffic Planners and agree with the findings and consider the layout provided to be well
designed.

10.2.3 Legacy Masterplan for Precinct and utilities routing

The utilities connections through the Precinct area have to account for Legacy Mode. However,
the masterplan is not available to account for the utilities routing. Most utilities connect to D3
Road utilities. Some, particularly Storm water and Foul Sewer are proposed in Schematic
Design to outfall in A3 Road tie-in. Electric power cables have to connect to the Primary
substation. In absence of frozen masterplan, these utilities connections will be done considering
the available road layout plans, assuming that the utilities corridors along the Road right of ways
may be utilised. Detailed discussion on impact on Legacy Mode is provided later in Section
10.7.

10.2.4 Authorities approval

The necessary authorities’ approvals are to be obtained by the contractor. An extract from
Scope of Works document (D2.1), Section 5 is provided below:

Technical Addendum No. 2, Appendix E mentions that all connection fees to the utilities are
obligation of Supreme Council. Tender Bulletin No. 18 further affirms this.

KEO is capable and has significant experience of undertaking this task.

10.3 Surveys and Investigation findings

10.3.1 Topographic Survey

Schematic Design Report, Section 4.19.2.2 notes that the existing ground levels vary from +9.0
QND in southwest to +3.0 QND in Northeast. The contour lines in the topographic survey
drawing (Document D4.1) indicates the ground level to rise from +5.0 QND to +7.2 across D3
Road. It is also to be noted that the sea side is on the east of the plot.

Document D2.4 includes Topographic Survey plot, which is extracted below:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 65
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Topographic Survey – Project Site

Appendix A-8 includes a copy of Topographic survey for the entire Precinct.

10.3.2 Ground Water Levels

Schematic Design Report, Section 4.19.2.8 notes that the present groundwater level is -6.0m
to -7.0m QND, potentially caused by dewatering from other nearby projects. It is expected to
rise to +5m QND in long term after urbanisation and irrigation recharging of the ground water.
The Design groundwater level has been proposed to +5.0m QND. It is to be noted, however,
Ashghal interim advice note mentions that ground water level is to be considered at ground
level. Extract Below from Document D2.4 shows the ground water levels found. Appendix A-8
includes a copy

Groundwater Survey – Project Site

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 66
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.4 Value Engineering Opportunities

In process of identifying Value Engineering Opportunities, all the available drawings were
studied carefully. The key drawings are included in Appendix A-8.

10.4.1 Utilities corridors

Upon considering the combined utilities drawing, it appears that reservations corridors for
individual utilities and how they can be run in a combined corridor so as to optimise the trench
work and space usage, may not have been properly considered. The diagram below shows a
concept of utilities reservation corridor.

Schematic Design Combined Utilities corridors

The sketch below shows a revised utilities corridor. The revision is aimed at reducing the trench
work and reflecting the VE exercise undertaken. Two tables in the following page are provided
which show the difference in excavation amounts. It appears there is likely to be around 24%
saving in excavation works. It is to be noted that based on the VE exercise outcome, the
Stormwater Attenuation tank and pipe connection to A3 road has been omitted. This is
discussed later. The table providing excavation volume for VE proposed, also differentiates for
the volume inside the project boundary and that for the outside in Precinct.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 67
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Combined Utilities corridors proposed under VE

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 68
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSED TRENCH EXCAVATION


Max Appx Depth Range Excavation
Utility Name Length (m) Width (m)
dia(mm) (m) Quantity(m3)
Foul Sewer 400 1000 2 4 8000

Stormwater Pipe 1100 2025 2 3 12150


Risingmain Outside 700 670 2 2.5 3350
Att.Tank 110 20 5 11000
Potable Water 450 430 1.5 3 1935
Valves 4x4 5 4 4 320
Irrigation TSE 100 430 1.5 3 1935
Valves 4x4 5 4 4 320
2 MV 1375 2 1.2 13200
Electrical 3 MV 1555 2.75 1.2 20526
1 MV 210 1 1.2 1008
Telecom 3271 3.5 1.2 13738.2
Road 380 8.3 0.75 2365.5
TOTAL 89847.7

VE PROPOSED TRENCH EXCAVATION


Inside/Outside
Appx Depth Excavation
Utility Name Length (m) Width (m) project
Range (m) Quantity(m3)
boundary?
Composite utilities
corridor surrounding 16270 2.5 40675
the stadium Inside project
Corridor connecting boundary
15 7 2.5 1050
to D3 Road
Road 380 8.3 0.75 2365.5
Foul sewer corridor
745 2 3 4470
crossing Precinct
Electrical to primary
1880 3.5 1.2 7896 Outside project
substation 3.5m wide boundary (Precinct)
Electrical to primary
substation 5m wide 493 5 1.2 11832
corridor
TOTAL 68288.5

10.4.2 Value Engineering Opportunities

In process of identifying Value Engineering Opportunities, following key information were


considered and actions undertaken:
 All the available drawings both for Stadium and the Precinct, relevant to the
infrastructure discipline were studied carefully. The key drawings are included in
Appendix A-8 for reference.
 The proposed design for utilities connections and infrastructures were considered based
on the drawings together with the Schematic Design Report (Document D2.2),
particularly its Section 4.19, and relevant code compliance and standards.
 QCS 2014 compliance, any FIFI requirements and Engineering experience and
knowledge
 Design coordination through the VE workshops held and design decisions made with
respect to the Stadium
 Consider information available from Lusail Real Estate Development Corporation
(LREDC).
 Coordination with Landscape design following decision to raise the stadium by 5m

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 69
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 Tender Addendum No. 2 which deals with Utilities connections scope

Table below lists the potential VE items utility-wise. The drawings mentioned can be referenced
in Appendix A-8. Only the items shaded were found to have VE opportunities.

Table xxx: VE Opportunity – Infrastructures

UTILITIES CONNECTION DETAILS REFERENCE DRAWING BRIEF DESCRIPTION VE ITEMS

MV Connections C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- 4 MV from Source A and 4 MV from No VE Item to note


1500 Source B

Connections to the Back-up No VE Item to note


Electrical Power C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- MV connections to Event Essential and
Generators
1500 Event Critical back-up power supply

Precinct Sub-stations and Mv C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- N/A


2 nos substations - Beyond scope
connections 1500
Potable Water connections C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- 450mm pipe supply connection to the No VE Item to note
into stadium 1501 stadium from D3 Road
Potable Water
Supply connections to Precinct C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- N/A
Beyond scope
area 1501
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Supply connection to the stadium from No VE Item to note
Connection to TSE supply
1502 D3 Road supply
Irrigation (TSE)
Supply connections to Precinct C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- N/A
Beyond scope
area 1502
No VE Item to note
1200mm twin pipe supply directly (Tender Addendum 2, Appx E
Coonection from District C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
District cooling from cooling plant connected to mentions the pipe connection upto
Cooling Plant to the stadium 1503
stadium at North and south locations ETS to be under "Others" scope)

Remove the Lifting pump station -


Pump station necessary to drive the stormwater to be held on site
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
Pump station stormwater to the outfall connection with "Wadi necklace" and the
1505
in A3 Road stadium proposed to be raised by
5m
Remove the Attenuation Tank -
100m x 12x x 2m tank constructed of stormwater to be held on site
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
Attenuation tank geocellular units with impermeable with "Wadi necklace" and the
1506
wrap. stadium proposed to be raised by
5m
Strom Water
Connection outfall to network in A3 Remove the connection pipe -
Road. Tender Addenda 2, Appx E stormwater to be held on site
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
Outfall connection pipe shows only one pipe instead 2 shown with "Wadi necklace" and the
1505
earlier stadium proposed to be raised by
5m
Stormwater pipe network in C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Network collector pipes No VE Item to note
stadium site 1505
Provisioned for the Precinct layout N/A
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
Trench soakaways in Precinct which is beyond the scope - Beyond
1505
scope
Network collector pipes No VE Item to note
Foul sewer connections from C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-
stadium to outfall in A3 Road 1506
Foul sewer Provisioned for the Precinct layout N/A
Foul sewer connections from C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- which is beyond the scope - Beyond
Precinct to outfall in A3 Road 1506 scope
Lighting and Lighting C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Proposed for Precinct layout - Beyond N/A
Lighting
connections 1007 scope
No VE Item to note. To be revised
Road Layout inside Stadium C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- by Landscaping following raising
Ramps access and Emirs Road access
site 3005 proposed for the stadium.
Road

C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- N/A
Road Layout in Precinct Beyond scope
3005
Telecom connections into C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Includes duct works for telecom No VE Item to note
stadium 1504
Telecom
Telecom connections for C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Beyond scope N/A
Precinct 1504
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- Proposed for Precinct layout - Beyond No VE Item to note
Fire Hydrant fire Hydrant connections
1509 scope
Potential to reduce amount of
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- Includes for excavation works for trench works necessary if the
Utilities corridors Combined utilities
1510 utilities utilities corridors could be
combined and refined.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 70
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.4.3 Storm Water

Only major VE could be found for Stromwater. Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1505 shows the proposed Storm Water
Design and the markings in red identifying the items removed under the VE exercise:

It is to be noted that this VE is based on provision of “Wadi necklace” proposed by the Landscape design which will contain the storm water.

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 71
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.4.4 Other utilities

Other utilities, as mentioned were not found to have potential VE opportunity. Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1506
shows the proposed Foul Sewer Design. Items circled in red are for the purpose of serving the precinct and have not been accounted in costing:

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 72
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1501 shows the proposed Potable Water Design. Items circled in red are for the
purpose of serving the precinct and have not been accounted in the costing:

Similarly other utilities drawings included in Appendix A8 may be referenced, which were used to define the quantities. Note is to be made that only
utilities supplying the stadium and the roadworks inside project site have been considered. Elements serving the Precinct usage have not been.

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 73
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.5 Summary of Quantities – Schematic Design and VE Proposed

Table below summarises the list of infrastructure elements, their quantities as per the tender Schematic Design and with quantities for the VE items:

QUANTITIES
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSED VE PROPOSED
UTILITIES CONNECTION DETAILSREFERENCE DRAWING VE ITEMS BRIEF DESCRIPTION REMARKS
Inside Project site Outside project site (Precinct area) Inside Project site Outside project site
MV Connections No VE Item to 4 MV from Source A and 4 MV All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA
note from Source B
Source A: Source A:
2 nos MV = 630m 4 nos MV = 765m
1 no. MV = 490m 4 spare ducts = 765m
(+100% spare ducts for all above)
Source B:
Source B: 4 nos. MV = 940m
Although power demand will be reduced, the MV
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 3 nos. MV = 210m 4 spare ducts = 940m
No change No change connections are not to be reduced compared to the SD.
AZ-1500 2 nos. MV = 240m
1 no. MV = 605m Surplus 150mm HDPE ducts:
(+100% spare ducts for all above) 4 ducts = 1705m
Electrical
Power Surplus 150mm HDPE ducts:
3 ducts = 210m
2 ducts = 870m
1 duct = 605m

Connections to the No VE Item to Backup generator


Back-up note MV connections to Event All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA Event Essential+Event Critical back-up generators are to
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
Generators Essential and Event Critical 2 runs of MV = 505m All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA No change No change be provisioned temporarily upto the Tournament stage.
AZ-1500
back-up power supply 1 run of MV = 460 4 runs of MV = 195m Connections unlikely to be altered.

No VE Item to
Precinct Sub- C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 2 nos substations - Beyond Scope limited to utilities connection to the stadium. The
note N/A N/A N/A N/A
stations AZ-1500 scope sub-stations are proposed for Precinct Layout needs.

No VE Item to 450mm pipe HDPE = 3900m 450mm pipe HDPE = 40m


Potable Potable Water C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
note Air valves = 1 Air valves = 1 No change No change Scope limited to utilities connection to the stadium
Water connections AZ-1501
Gate valves = 3
No VE Item to 100mm pipe HDPE = 1425m
note Gate valves = 4
Irrigation Connection to TSE C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
Air valves = 4 N/A - Beyond scope No change N/A Scope limited to utilities connection to the stadium
(TSE) supply AZ-1502
washouts = 2

No VE Item to
note
(Tender
Addendum 2, With reduced Chilled water
Coonection from Appx E demand, the connection The load is reduced to 60.0 MW cooling capacity x 2 Nos
District District Cooling C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- mentions the could be tied to the available N/A - connection cost not unto N/A - connection cost not unto ETS plant from MEP VE exercise. 1200mm dia, 715 m pipe
N/A N/A
cooling Plant to the AZ-1503 pipe supply in D3 Road for the contrator contrator length could be reduced to 750mm pipe dia 250m long by
stadium connection connection to the north of connecting to local supply connection.
upto ETS to be the stadium
under
"Others"
scope)

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 74
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Remove the With the raised stadium, the


Lifting pump attenuation tank could be Nil - Remove
"Wadi Necklace" to be proposed by landscpae for holding
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- station (with raised so that lifting pump altogether.
Pump station Pump chamber with three pumps - No change the entire stromwater for attenuation. It will also help
AZ-1505 three pumps station will not be necessary
with security design for the stadium.
of 230 l/s to drive the stormwater to A3
capacity) connection
Remove the
Attenuation
Tank -
Estimated storm rate = 1500 100m x 12x x 2m tank constructed of Nil - Remove "Wadi Necklace" to be proposed by landscpae for holding
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- stormwater to
Attenuation tank l/s geocellular units with impermeable - altogether. No change the entire stromwater for attenuation. It will also help
AZ-1506 be held on
Allowed outfall rate = 462 l/s wrap. with security design for the stadium.
site with
"Wadi
necklace"
Remove the Connection outfall to Nil 1100mm pipe HDPE = 650m
connection network in A3 Road. Tender
Strom Water pipe - Addenda 2, Appx E shows Nil - Remove
"Wadi Necklace" to be proposed by landscpae for holding
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- stormwater to only one pipe instead 2 altogether.
Outfall connection pipe No change the entire stromwater for attenuation. It will also help
AZ-1505 be held on shown earlier
with security design for the stadium.
site with
"Wadi
necklace"
No VE Item to Network collector pipes 1100mm pipe HDPE = 255m N/A - Beyond scope
note 1000mm pipe HDPE = 95m
900mm pipe HDPE = 115m
Stormwater pipe
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 800mm pipe HDPE = 140m
network in stadium No change
AZ-1505 600mm pipe HDPE = 170m
site
500mm pipe HDPE = 490m
400mm pipe HDPE = 500m
300mm pipe HDPE = 260m
No VE Item to Provisioned for the Precinct
Trench soakaways C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
note layout which is beyond the Nil N/A - beyond scope No change
in Precinct AZ-1505
scope
No VE Item to 500mm pipe = 80m
note 400mm pipe = 170m 500mm pipe = 500m
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 300mm pipe = 670m Only those connection accounted which is provisioned
Foul sewer Foul sewer connections No change
AZ-1506 200mmpipe = 150m for taking the sewer to outfall in A3 Road.
No. of manholes = 11
No. of manholes = 33
Lighting and No VE Item to No information on details of
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
Lighting Lighting note precinct lighting available - N/A N/A N/A
AZ-1007
connections beyond scope
No VE Item to Precinct Road beyond scope. Precinct roadworks beyond scope
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-
Road Road Layout note Only road within site to be No change N/A
AZ-3005
considered 7.3m carriageway = 380m N/A - Beyond scope
No VE Item to Includes duct works for Required Duct pipes sizes: Required Duct pipes sizes:
note telecom ICT & Telecom: ICT & Telecom:
110mm dia, 4 nos. - 156m each 110mm dia, 4 nos. - 2590m each
90mm dia, 2 nos - 156m each 90mm dia, 2 nos - 2590m each

Broadband: Broadband:
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
Telecom Telecom connections 150mm dia 12 nos. - 143m each 150mm dia 12 nos. - 66m each No change No change Precinct telecom works beyond scope
AZ-1504
600mm wide trays - 60m

Telephone mains: Telephone mains:


90mm , 8 nos. = 420m 90mm , 8 nos. = 468m
110mm, 12 nos. = 420m 110mm, 12 nos. = 468m
Fire hydrant C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- No VE Item to Fire Hydrant system uses 225mm dia DI pipe, L = 1975m
Fire Hydrant No change No change Precinct Fire Hydrant network works beyond scope
connections AZ-1509 note Stadium Fire fighting system 15 nos. Hydrant stations N/A- beyond scope
Utilities utilities corridor reservation
Utilities corridor to be drawing not available.
Trench excavation C01-FOS-D-STA-T-CI-AL-
reservation uniformised 89,848 m3 of trench excavation work 44091 m3 19398 m3 Approx. 30% less excavation works required
work AZ-1510
corridor i.e. trench
o length

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 75
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

10.6 VE Exercise Conclusion

Based on the VE exercise, the following items could be removed from the tender Schematic
Design proposal:
 100m x 12m x 2m Attenuation tank for storm water
 Storm water pump station including three pumps of 230l/s capacity
 650m of stormwater pipe of 1100mm dia pipe

Unifying the utilities reservation corridor has also potential for saving in excavation required for
utilities trench work, by approximately 30%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 76
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

11 VE of GSAS/ GORD Sustainability Compliance and Code Compliance

The VE considerations from a purely sustainability perspective (while still achieving a GSAS 4
Star rating) are:
 Materials Certification 1 - No ISO14001/BS8902 certification requirement for material
suppliers
 Materials Certification 2 - No LCA/EPD Certificates required from material suppliers
 Reduced Specifications of Water & Refrigerant Leak Detection Systems
 Minimum Energy metering and still providing water Sub-metering
 Remove 6,500m2 PV panels from the roof
 Remove bicycle, bicycle lanes and anything else that it is related to bicycles.

The current scheme GSAS scorecard, with a comparison to the original Arup scorecard is
shown below.

The major changes resulting from the above strategies are highlighted in red.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 77
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

12 VE of CFD Modeling of Isothermal, Thermal and Code Compliance

12.1 Topic

Text…..

12.1.1 Subtopic

Text…..

12.2 Topic

Text…..

12.2.1 Subtopic

Text…..

12.2.1.1 Subtopic

Text….
 Bullet

o Sub-bullet

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 78
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

13 VE of Players Pitch and Code Compliance

13.1 Hemiview/Turfgrass strategy/Pitch shading structure

13.1.1 Background

The VE concept includes an enlarged oculus opening which will potentially reduce internal
shading and therefore allow a greater amount of light to reach a greater proportion of the pitch
surface. In turn this increase in light levels may present the opportunity to alter the pitch
management strategy to a more conventional transitional method which could provide the
opportunity to remove the requirement for the pitch shading structure/s and therefore reduce
costs by approximately seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

At present the 100% SD turfgrass management strategy is based around the concept of
maintaining cool season turfgrass all year round due to low light levels caused by shade from
the 100% SD roof design.

The conventional way to manage high quality turf on a Middle East pitch is to have a dual warm
season/cool season turf strategy whereby warm season turf dominates between the months of
May to October (approx.) and cool season turf dominates from about November to April
(approx.). This strategy requires the pitch to be oversown with cool season turf seed in late
October/early November and involves a closure period of approx. 4-6 weeks to allow the cool
season turf to establish. In order to facilitate a cool season all year round approach the SD
concept incudes a pitch shading structure to mitigate high summer temperatures.

Figure 1. Pitch shade system

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 79
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The focus of our VE investigation has been to analyse the revised roof to assess whether a
conventional transitional turfgrass strategy would be possible given the redesigned oculus
opening. The VE oculus opening is only marginally larger than the SD opening across but
significantly the whole roof has been lowered which is particularly relevant. Figure 2 below
illustrates the impact of lowering the stadium roof in combination with the sun’s angle.

Previously the 100% Scheme Design for the roof had the level of the pitch at 42 m below the
base of the roof and 58 m below the top of the roof. The current VE configuration has the level
of the pitch some 35 m below the base of the roof and 55 m below the top of the roof.

Figure 2. Roof oculus opening illustrating sun track

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 80
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

13.1.2 Hemiview results

Hemiview analysis is carried out on a roof design to estimate the amount of photosynthetically
active radiation (PAR) reaching the pitch. The amount of PAR received at pitch level is a
combination of the latitude and elevation of the site combined with the orientation of the stadium,
the shape and height of the roof as well as the materials used for roof construction.

The following diagram illustrates each of the 35 images rendered from a 3D model of the
stadium roof oculus looking upwards from the pitch surface. These images are processed
resulting in average monthly light intervals for each position displayed as contour maps. The
gradient maps illustrated in Figures 4-7 show a comparison between pitch light levels predicted
from the SD roof opening and the VE roof.

Figure 3. Hemiview rendered positions

Guidelines given are 35 mol/m²/day of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for active
growth of warm season turf vs. 12 mol/m²/day for cool season turf.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 81
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The 100% SD Hemiview interpretation is as follows:


 In January, light levels over the whole pitch are predicted to range from 25 mol/m²/day
in the northern end of the pitch to values in the southern half of the pitch typically less
than 5 mol/m²/day. For most the pitch the predicted values are well below the 12
mol/m²/day minimum threshold normally recommended to maintain actively-growing
cool season grass under football wear. Cool season grass would be viable but only with
significant artificial lighting to help strengthen the turf around the southern end of the
pitch, particularly around the goalmouth and other high wear areas (see later).
 During February, the levels in the southern section of the pitch are predicted to increase
to between 5-15 mol/m²/day. Levels over the northern half of the pitch rise to between
20–30 mol/m²/day. Again supplementary lighting would be required to strengthen the
turf around the southern end of the pitch. A strategy using Warm season turf all year
round is not viable.
 In March, levels over the southern end of the pitch are still predicted to be low but with
a reduced footprint compared with January and February. Approximately two thirds of
the pitch have light levels above the cool season minimum threshold of 12 mol/m²/day.
Light levels over about half the pitch are at or above 25 mol/m²/day. Average daily
temperatures through March suggest that cool season grass would still dominate in the
stadium.
 In April, light levels more than 30 mol/m²/day are predicted to cover the central and
northern ends of the playing surface. However, levels below 20 mol/m²/day are still seen
along the southern end of the pitch. Daily temperatures can start to rise toward 35°C by
the end of the month which could cause severe stress to the cool season grass causing
it to die back. However, establishing warm season grass would be difficult, if not
impossible, at the southern end of the pitch.
 During the period from May to August inclusive, the light distribution pattern is broadly
similar, with light levels in the northern and southern extremes of the pitch remaining
suited to cool season grass but the central portion of the pitch better suited to warm
season grass (a recommended warm season grass threshold of 35 mol/m²/day is
required for robust growth). Currently, temperatures can rise toward 40°C which is likely
to kill off existing cool season grass unless the bowl could be artificially cooled and the
central portion of the pitch artificially shaded. If warm season grass was to be
established in May of each year from stolons, the playing surface would only be able to
be used for about a month before the quality of turf started to decline as light levels
declined and even then warm season turf would not establish successfully at the
northern and southern extremes of the pitch without some kind of lighting supplement.
 During September the light distribution is almost identical to April, with October,
November and December mirroring March, February and January respectively.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 82
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The VE Hemiview interpretation is as follows:


 In January, light levels over the whole pitch are predicted to range from 25 mol/m²/day
in the northern end of the pitch to values in the southern half of the pitch typically less
than 10 mol/m²/day. For most the pitch the predicted values are well below the 12
mol/m²/day minimum threshold normally recommended to maintain actively-growing
cool season grass under football wear. Cool season grass would be viable but only with
significant artificial lighting to help strengthen the turf around the southern end of the
pitch, particularly around the goalmouth and other high wear areas. Light levels are
comparable with the SD roof though there is marginally more light and the shade pattern
is more uniform making it slightly easier to manage
 Light levels are comparable with the SD roof though there is marginally more light and
the shade pattern is much more uniform making it slightly easier to manage. Over half
the pitch is above the 12 mol/m²/day threshold required in order to sustain cool season
turfgrass without the requirement for supplementary lighting though supplementary
lighting would be required to strengthen the turf in the southern end of the pitch.
 In March, light levels over the entire middle and northern areas of the pitch increase
considerably. The extent and uniformity of the improved area in comparison with the
SD roof is significant and this is reflected in the deployment schedule. It should be noted
that light levels in the southern end are so low that deployment is not possible with
'normal levels' of supplementary lighting rigs. Average daily temperatures through
March suggest that cool season grass would still dominate in the stadium.
 April is a key month as local temperatures increase toward 35°C by the end of the month
which signals the normal transition from cool to warm season turfgrass. Light levels are
still problematic but are significantly higher than the SD roof and could potentially be
managed during this phase.
 Warm season turfgrass would be in situ from May through to August. Light levels
suggest that this is manageable with the VE roof configuration. Supplementary lighting
would be required to strengthen the turf in the southern end of the pitch though levels
are markedly lower than the SD roof and the deployment areas are isolated to the
southern section.
 During September the light distribution is almost identical to April, with October,
November and December mirroring March, February and January respectively.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 83
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 4. January to March; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 84
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 5. April to June; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 85
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 6. July to September; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 86
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 7. October to December; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 87
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

13.1.3 Deployment schedule

Supplementary lighting deployment schedules for both the 100% SD and VE roof are included
below for comparison. There are significant improvements in terms of both light levels and
uniformity especially across the northern end of the pitch. It should also be noted that in some
months, notably the transition phase where light levels are marginal so that provision of
sufficient light for plant health is not achievable with 'normal levels' of supplementary lighting
rigs (see pink sections in Fig. 9 below).

The maximum deployment for ‘normal level’ supplementary lighting is 20-22 days per month
maximum set to allow for pitch logistics, match play and maintenance requirements.

Figure 8. VE roof deployment schedule

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 88
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 9. 100% SD roof deployment schedule

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 89
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

13.1.4 Discussion

It is evident from the gradient maps that the VE roof design allows a greater overall amount of
light reach the pitch surface. Not only that but the light reaching the surface is more uniform
and better distributed throughout most of the year.

When evaluating whether a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy would be
appropriate for the VE version of the Lusail Stadium pitch, it is necessary to set some ‘target’
(PAR) light levels to reflect the different types of grass that would be present during different
times of the year and to reflect natural light levels available. These target light levels are shown
in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2 - Proposed target light values for a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy
at Lusail

Month Theoretical dual turf management approach Target (mol/ day)

Jan Cool season whole pitch 15*

Feb Cool season whole pitch 20

Mar Mainly cool season – start of transition 25

Apr Transition month 35

May Warm season 35

Jun Warm season 35

Jul Warm season 35

Aug Warm season 35

Sep Warm season declining 30

Oct Transition month 20

Nov Cool season 20

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 90
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Dec Cool season 15*

* Note that a lower limit of 15 mol/day is set for the pitch during the months of January and
February but which still allows better survival of underlying semi-dormant warm season turf (for
a pure monostand of cool season grass, a value of 12 mol/day is used).

13.1.5 Discussion and conclusion

By interrogating the deployment schedule along with an assessment of local climatic conditions
we can better understand which type of turf management strategy is best suited to any situation.
The recommended strategy for 100% SD involved using cool season grass species all year
round primarily because of the shade problems caused by the roof structure. The concept
involved the use of supplementary technologies such as sub surface aeration and pitch specific
shade covers used in combination to mitigate the effects of the summer climate and enable
suitable conditions for cool season grasses survival.

As previously discussed the conventional method of managing high quality turf in the Middle
East pitch is to have a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy whereby warm season
turf dominates between the months of May to October (approx.) and cool season turf dominates
from about November to April (approx.). In order to employ this strategy, the stadium
architecture must enable sufficient light levels at the pitch surface to sustain each type of
turfgrass.

The Hemiview results indicate that the VE roof will provide sufficient light levels for a transitional
strategy, though there are some months, notably the transition phase, where light levels are
marginal and are above the threshold for normal deployment of supplementary lighting rigs.

It should also be highlighted that the proposed target light values used as the basis for
determining the turfgrass strategy are currently being examined by specific research in Doha
aimed at improving our understanding of optimal light levels for transitional turfgrass
management in the region.

13.2 Air Circulation System

13.2.1 Background

The pitch specific ventilation and air circulation system had been included within the 100% SD
scheme. This type of system can help to mitigate high humidity levels and the lack of natural
ventilation within the stadium bowl as well as providing a mechanism to mitigate peak water
levels and subsequent flooding after storm events.

The pitch ventilation/air circulation system is used to replenish oxygen in the rootzone, reduce
carbon dioxide, remove excess moisture and modify rootzone temperature, all of which will help
turf survive mid-day heat stress, high humidity levels and the lack of natural ventilation in the
stadium bowl.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 91
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Fig. 10. Carpet-type turf reinforcement system.

13.2.2 Discussion and conclusion

Given the overall stadium architecture remains essentially unchanged from the original 100%
SD concept, we would not anticipate a significant variation in the pitch microclimate and
therefore we would advocate retaining the pitch ventilation/air circulation system as a core
elements of the pitch management strategy. It should also be noted that the inclusion of a pitch
ventilation/air circulation within World Cup stadia is a FIFA preference mainly to reduce the risk
of match cancellation in the event of a significant storm event.

13.3 Turfgrass Reinforcement

13.3.1 Background

A carpet type reinforcing product was specified for the stadium pitch at 100% SD. This approach
proposed the use of intact fabrics or artificial turf carpet placed into or below the surface, filled
with rootzone material and in which natural turfgrass is grown (Fig. 11 below).

The selection of a carpet type reinforcing product is based mainly on the increased wear
tolerance and surface stability such products offer turfgrass. This type of carpet type reinforcing
product would also allow for the rapid replacement or re-turf of the pitch with limited risk whilst
providing the benefits of a full natural turf pitch.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 92
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Fig. 11. Carpet-type turf reinforcement system.

13.3.2 Discussion and conclusion

In terms of flexibility, installing a reinforcement product which permits a relatively quick pitch
replacement in the event of pitch failure reduces risk, especially around the World Cup
tournament itself.

The change from a cool season management strategy to a more conventional transitional
management strategy will not affect the primary rationale behind the inclusion of a carpet type
pitch reinforcement system, namely increased wear tolerance and surface stability. We would
therefore recommend that this element of the 100% SD concept is retained.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 93
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

14 VE of Security Strategy & Blast Analysis and Code Compliance

14.1 Overview

The original design documentation refers to ‘security’ in a number of instances throughout the
documentation produced by Arups however this review is primarily based upon the Security
Report and accompanying drawings which are listed below. Furthermore the work has been
completed with due consideration of the work producedby other members of the design team,
such as Structures, Façade Design and Landscape Archetects:
Reference Title
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-REP-SE00025 RevT0 Security Report
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-SE-XX-XX-1000 Stadium EACS + IDS + Intercoms deployment
(drawings for Levels B4, B3, B2, B1, 01, 02, 03,
04, P5)
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-SE-AL-AZ-XXXX Stadium security schematic drawings

However, there are a number of documents which we would expect to receive at this level of
design which were not provided. Examples include:
 CCTV layout drawings for the stadium
 CCTV schedules for the hardware within the stadium
 CCTV layout drawings for the precinct
 CCTV schedules for the hardware within the precinct
 Intruder detection system schedules for the stadium and precinct
 Access control system schedules for the stadium and precinct
 Vehicle dynamics assessment
 Hostile vehicle mitigation drawings and schedules for the stadium and precinct
 Lighting and CCTV coordination report
 Structural analysis of the structure and façade when subjected to blast

The review which we have undertaken is primarily based upon the mandatory guidance
documents which have been produced by the Supreme Committee, a list of the most relevant
documents is provided below (not withstanding standards and codes of practice which also play
a role in the decision process):
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRF-0620 Qatar 2022 Security Risk Profile (Summary)
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0393 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar Security Strategy
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0882 CPTED & Ancillary Security
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0883 Security Barriers
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0884 Access Control
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0885 Hostile Vehicle Mitigation
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0886 Search & Screening
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0887 Security Resilience Part B
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0889 Intruder Detection
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0890 Video Surveillance
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0891 Security Lighting
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0790 Security Design Guide
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0875 Security Resilience Strategy: Part B
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0930 Stadium/Precinct Integrated Control Rooms
Strategy
 Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRC-1249 Void Identification / Certification

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 94
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 Q22M-PMC-1378 Emiri Decree No 9


 FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations 5th Edition
 FIFA Safety and Security Regulations
 FIFA Safety Guidelines
 Q22M-C04-CAB-RAM-RED-EL-0447 Electronic Security and Control Room
 Q22M-APW-CMN-MEM-PMC-QSC-14-00002 Programme wide Standoff Distance
Technical Memo

The proceeding sections consider the Arup submission in more detail and provide commentary
on whether the work is considered compliant with the guidance documents and best practice.

14.2 Overview of Lusail Stadium Security Report

The main body of the report presents the basis of design utilised throughout and is backed up
with appendices which provide more detailed information on the design submission. However,
in our opinion the schematic design report lacks the level of detail we would come to expect for
a project of this type and a number of critical items have been overlooked at this stage of the
design process.

A key part of a submission of this type is a critical assets register which sets out all of the assets
which will require commensurate levels of protection depending on the critically of the asset to
Qatar 2022. The security requirements for the assets will change during the three phases of
the project (Base, Overlay, and Legacy) and each asset should be considered separately for
each stage. Furthermore, the critical assets within the Precinct, (which help to maintain the
functionality within the stadium) have also not been provided, we believe this is a critical
oversight.

14.3 Review of Threat and Vulnerability Risk Assessment

The threat and vulnerability assessment is presented in Appendix B and correctly considers all
principal threat types such as terrorism, crime and cyber. It also considers the three stages,
Base, Tournament and Legacy however crucially the threat assessment does not consider
critical assets individually, instead it would appear that the residual risk is equally shared across
all assets, this approach can lead to an uneconomical design.

Furthermore, the threat and vulnerability (T & V) assessment does not provide mitigation
measures within the assessment table, instead the mitigation measures (including items such
as electronic and physical security) are presented on a separate table but is not integrated within
the T&V assessment.

However, the mitigation measures are clearly laid out for various areas of the development and
the presentation does make it easy to check. A review of the mitigation measures, at Base, is
provided below:

The threats considered within the report are generally considered to be applicable however
there are a couple of areas which we believe require reconsideration. The ballistic threat is
specified as being 0.44” Magnum (BR/FB4) which is no longer a common ballistic round type
and we do not believe it is particularly applicable to Qatar 2022.

The blast threat does not appear to have been considered in any detail, instead a high level,
qualitative assessment has been carried out which considers the possible effects and response
of the structure as opposed to conducting analyses. It is also unclear whether the charge sizes
(TNT NEQ) have been provided to the design team for consideration. The work is based upon
the assumption that the HVM perimeter (specified within the SC guidance notes) is being
provided but there is little evidence to suggest that the standoff is actually achievable. We would

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 95
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

expect plans of the precinct to include the HVM boundary as a way of checking that the standoff
has been achieved, otherwise the load on the facades and structural frame could be
considerably greater than anticipated (which could lead to hardening of the structure).

14.4 Review of CCTV Provision

The CCTV provision (i.e. 10%R Detect, 25%R Observe, 50%R Recognise, 120%R Identify) is
in accordance with normal guidance. Emiri Decree No.9 utilises the Rotakin system which is
based upon PAL 576i CCTV cameras, however the cameras are expected to be Megapixel
which operate at a higher resolution. A study has been carried out in the original design which
usefully compares PAL576i with megapixel categories based upon minimum pixels per metre.

However, it is worth noting that Observe is not specified within Emiri Decree No.9, yet ‘Monitor’
at 5%R is.

The coverage levels are in accordance with Decree No.9 however we would recommend
revisiting the following areas:
 120% R is specified for the ‘Stadium Seating Bowl’. We would recommend 50% R
Recognise
 120% R is specified for the ‘Field of Play’. We would recommend 25% R Recognise
 120% R is specified for ‘Emergency Escape Lobbies’. We would recommend 50% R
Recognise

50% R recognise is specified for a large number of back of house areas.

It is unclear whether this only applies to the entrances as CCTV drawings have not been
specified. Generally we would recommend 50%R to the entrances and 10% to 25% coverage
of the area in question. In addition some areas, such as enclosed plant rooms may not require
any coverage, and it may not be practical to do so (due to fixed equipment obstructing the view
and restricting sight lines).

The above revisions to the CCTV strategy will result in considerable savings, in terms of both
CCTV hardware but also with respect to data storage.

The report recommends the provision of 120days on site storage (of CCTV footage) but no
indication as to what the overall storage requirements. In our experience the storage
requirements for 120days of footage, for a building of this type, will be extremely large
(especially when considering that the data should be backed up). Whilst it is important to
maintain 120 days storage (as specified within Decree No.9) we would recommend, in this
instance, only allowing for 31days of onsite storage and 90 days of offsite storage (perhaps in
the National Command Centre). A review of the storage requirements is provided below:

In order to be compliant with the MOI requirements the following needs to be provided within
the design:
 120 Day storage of all CCTV Cameras
 Continuous recording at 25fps
 Megapixel video footage

The following technical data is used to calculate storage requirement:


 Megapixel image quality is 1280 x 1024 pixels
 1 camera recording at 25fps, at 4CIF quality, compressed to MPEG4 equates to
2.5Mbps
 4CIF image quality is 704 x 480 pixels

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 96
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Therefore, when comparing Megapixel to 4CIF there is an increase in data of 3.9, on this basis:
 1 camera in HD transmits 2.5 x 3.9 = 9.75Mbps
 1Mbps = 10Gb per day for 120 days equates to 11.7Tb per camera

Using an online bandwidth / storage calculator with the same data the estimate is 46.7Tb per
camera.

In calculating the possible number of cameras likely to be required around the site the following
assumptions have been made:
 Areas which have an observation criteria of ‘Monitor’ will have cameras located at no
greater distance than 100m
 Areas which have an observation criteria of ‘Detect’ will have cameras located at no
greater distance than 50m.
 A 10% margin will be allowed to Base stage
 A 20% margin will be allowed to Overlay stage

A CCTV schedule has not been provided by Arups however we estimate that there will be
approximately 640 cameras at base in order to meet the SC’s and Emiri Decree no.9 coverage
requirement, plus an additional +1000 cameras to deal with precinct security and additional
coverage of the stadium during overlay. On this basis we estimate the following data storage
requirements:
On this basis the total data storage required to meet the MOI is:
 Base: 7,488 Tb Minimum 29,888 Tb Maximum
 Overlay: 19,013 Tb Minimum 75,888 Tb Maximum

However based upon our proposal that the data is stored for 31 days only and at 8fps record
rate.

8fps is 1/3 the data requirement of 25fps.

31 days storage is ¼ the data requirement of 120 days.

Therefore if the DC proposal is accepted the maximum data storage required would be:
 Base: 2,491 Tb Maximum
 Overlay: 6,324 Tb Maximum

Please note all these figures are based on a number of assumptions, and do not necessarily
represent the final requirements which would be established at detailed design stage, where
camera positions would need to be fully coordinated with Landscaping, M&E Services etc
however the above relates to a considerable cost saving with respect to data storage. Please
note that we believe there is a requirement for N+1 storage which mean data storage may
actually be twice the figure indicated above.

However, our detailed review of the CCTV provision could not be completed as the CCTV
drawings and schedules were not issued. Furthermore the CCTV provision across the Precinct
has also not been discussed/provided. The layout and coverage of the cameras in the Precinct
is important to the functionality of the stadium and should be considered in more detail. Although
this function will fall into the Overlay phase an allowance needs to be made at Base build.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 97
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

We would also expect receipt of a Lighting & CCTV coordination study which will consider the
Lux levels through the precinct and stadium. We could not find this study and recommend
considering this in more detail during the next design phase.

14.5 Review of Access Control Systems

Both electronic and mechanical access control systems are proposed throughout the stadium.
It is apparent (although this cannot be confirmed as we do not have door schedules) that
electronic access control will be used extensively across the stadium whereas we believe that
there is an opportunity to restrict the use of access control to key areas. For example it is feasible
to provide electronic access control to gain entry to back of house zones (i.e. the doorway from
unrestricted to restricted foyers) but we would recommend providing keyed entry to doors to
individual back of house rooms (e.g. plant rooms). The areas would still be covered by intruder
detection linked to the alarm systems (the zoning would be operated from the Security Control
Room, SCR) and a key management system would be operated from the SCR.

The above proposals also apply to the Hospitality boxes which have been provided with
electronic access control (EAC), however we do not believe this is practical in areas which are
semi-public and do not particularly benefit from EAC systems. In this area we would recommend
providing key suited system with access to keys strictly controlled from the SCR.

We estimate that approximately 50% of the EACS doors could be replaced with keyed entry
which offers a considerable cost saving to both the electronic access control hardware but also
the data management relating to access control. The introduction of a key suited system will
result in some financial expenditure however it is strongly believed that a considerable cost
saving can still be achieved.

14.6 Review of Physical Security

The physical security is based upon a layered approach which provides a sensible basis of
design, however the protection against climbing (as a means of gaining entry) has not been
considered and will only form part of the design at Detailed Design phase. The security ratings
within the report refer to the LPS 1175 standard (SR1 to SR8) which is widely recognised
standard in the United Kingdom and referenced within the Qatar 2022 documentation.

The majority of the door sets within the documentation are specified as SR2/SR3. Whilst this
level of protection may be applicable we believe there is an opportunity to lower some of the
SR3 doors to SR2. However, as door schedules were not provided we were unable to carry out
detailed checks to determine the number of doors that this may affect.

Furthermore, the report specifies the use of Maglocks in many restricted areas across the
development. Maglocks are inherently weak and not recommended for use in secure
environments. We would recommend restricting their use to only ‘public to public’ areas. Instead
we would recommend providing electro-mechanical locks to restricted areas in order to achieve
a level of protection commensurate to the doors. Also there was no evidence that the doors that
are proposed, whilst taking into consideration the access control requirements, are available in
Qatar.

The security levels to the walling are in keeping with the security provision to the doors,
however, the form of construction is not discussed in detail. We envisage the use of blockwork
construction in most areas, which can be upgraded to suit the specified level of physical security.

For example, walling requiring a base level of security, eg SR2 could be provided with 7N/mm2
blocks, half stretcher thick (215mm), however a medium level of protection could be achieved
using a dense concrete block (22.5N/mm2) 215mm thick, which can be further enhanced with

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 98
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

the provision of expanded metal lathing fixed to the back face (or both faces, depending on
where the attack is coming from). Alternatively reinforced concrete walls could also be
considered, a 150mm RC wall will achieve 17 minutes resistance to a sledgehammer or over
10mins using a petrol disc cutter. Alternative forms of construction are also available if required,
such as stud partition walls which incorporate metal lathing and timber sublayers.,

The level of security offered to the roof gantry was not considered by the Designers and careful
consideration should be offered to how access will controlled in the future. The roof offers
significant vantage points in the event of an attack and enables terrorist to target critical
structural members as indicated below.

14.7 Search and Screening

A search and screening capability is proposed at Base design. The need for this does not
appear to correlate with the threat and risk assessment which advises that the threat of a person
borne device, or concealed weapon is Low.

An extensive search and screening plaza will be provided in the Precinct during Tournament
mode and we do not believe that an additional facility is required within the stadium. Although
cable ways and power could be provided should the risks change.

However, we do recommend the provision of connectivity from the stadium perimeter (at
entrance points) to the SCR, in the form of a hardwired cabled link to the SCR, in the event that
the security threat level changes in the future. This can then be used if Mag and Bag screening
is required.

14.8 Review of Security Stakeholders Requirements

We anticipate that there is a list detailing the requirements of all security stakeholders with
respect to physical security, electronic security and architecture. It is unclear whether this has
been considered in detail by the design team however we recommend conducting a thorough
review of their requirements during the next phase of works.

14.9 Hostile Vehicle Mitigation

The resilience of the stadium to resist the effects of blast is primarily based upon the standoff
which can be achieved from a vehicle borne device. Furthermore it is important to ensure that
a vehicle borne device cannot gain entry down into the basement of the stadium. We would
expect drawings to be prepared showing how hostile vehicle mitigation measures will be
provided around the stadium and surrounding area, however there is little evidence within the
documentation describing how this will be achieved.

It is proposed that during base build a line of Hesco Bastion gabions, filled with spoil from the
site, will be provided around the facility, however we believe that during base build a more
permanent, and architecturally appealing solution could be developed using the natural
landscape and street furniture. Consideration will also be given to reviewing the vehicle
approach routes to see if the approach speed can be controlled such that the impact energy will
be lower and a more economical solution can be sought.

Furthermore a detailed design will be required to ensure that the access to the basement is
restricted. We recommend the use of IWA14 / PAS68 tested rising barriers to the basement
entrance. In order to reduce capital expenditure we would recommend the use of the Cedar
barrier which is a manually operated barrier which is cost effective yet robust.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 99
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

It is clear that a lot of work needs to be carried out to complete the HVM design and this will
form an important part of the next phase of works.

14.10 Review of Blast Requirements

The security designers for Lusail had not analysed the effects of blast onto the stadium structure
or façade, instead they had provided some commentary on the anticipated response and
discussed possible failure modes.

However, our review is based the programme wide standoff document reference Q22M-APw-
CMN-MEM-PMC-QSC-14-0002 which specifies standoff requirements for the stadium with
respect to vehicle borne devices.

The technical memo was issued in order to obtain agreement between Security Stakeholders
with regards to stand off distances from vehicle borne threats. It considered two threat sizes
which we are referring to as:
 Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device (VBIED)
 Large Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device (LVBIED)

Standoff Requirements

It is understood that the standoff requirements specified by the stakeholders are predominantly
only applicable to the Tournament mode however we have also considered their impact on the
Base and Legacy modes.

During the tournament there are two categories for Standoff which are to be achieved where
practicable. The first deals with Match Days and the second considers Non Match Days, the
standoff criteria for them both is provided below:
Match Day

Provide a standoff of 300m between all unscreened trucks, large commercial vehicles and
Tournament Critical Assets and Crowded Spaces – Considered to be a LVBIED.

Provide a standoff of 100m between all unscreened cars, SUV’s and

Tournament Critical Assets and Crowded Spaces – Considered to be a VBIED.


Non Match Day

Provide 100m standoff between all unscreened vehicles and Tournament Critical Assets and
Crowded Spaces
Vehicle Descriptions

In accordance with the standoff document two vehicles types have been considered, images of
the vehicles have been provided below:

Large Commercial Vehicles include, but are not limited to, the following examples:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 100
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Cars and Sports Utility Vehicles (SUV’s) include, but are not limited to the following examples:

The diagram overview shows an indicative 100m and 300m standoff from the stadium. It
requires further detail from the Landscape Architect, which will provide more detailed
information on the extent of the surrounding roads, structures and landscaping (some of which
we can incorporate into the HVM plan). More information to follow.

Vehicle Routes

The vehicles routes within and around the stadium vary depending on the phase of operation,
an overview is provided below (drawing required from Landscape architect):
Critical Assets

In accordance with the above requirements we have considered the following Critical Assets
and crowded spaces:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 101
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Base Mode
 Stadium
 VVIP Parking
 Substation
 District Cooling (energy centre)

Tournament
 Stadium
 VVIP Parking
 Substation
 District Cooling
 Search Screening
 Walkways

Legacy Mode
 Stadium
 VVIP Parking
 Substation
 District Cooling

Blast Parameters

Whilst the design document provides information on the standoff, no information was provided
on the size of the charges so it is not possible to be certain on the design pressures which
should be considered (charge weights are likely to be classified). However, based upon best
practice we have assumed some typical charge weights for a VBIED and a LVBIED and derived
blast design parameters for use in the analysis of the facades. The results from our analyses
are provided below.

14.11 Façade Response

The façade is described in more detail in Section 16, however the Figure below shows a cross
section through the stadium.

Based upon the design documentation it is our intention to provide protection to building
occupants in the event of an external detonation whilst also minimising the amount of debris
which will produced from the outside façade of the structure.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 102
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 103
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The following façade references apply to the external façade:


 EWS 501/502/503 GFRC cladding system
 EWS 102/106 is a capless curtain walling stick system.
 AM 501 Roof calligraphy fascia

The section below considers each façade individually.

EWS 501/502/503 – GFRC Cladding

The Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete Cladding was originally proposed, an image of the
EWS503 façade has been provided below:

Blast tests have been conducted on GFRC cladding systems and the results from the test
demonstrate that the system has blast resistant capabilities however the fibre strand length and
density is an important factor in ensuring a suitably resistant product.

However, the façade engineers have proposed alternative systems as a part of the VE exercise,
a number of proposals have been considered:
 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or
Powder coating.
 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with patterned aluminium painted PVDF or Powder
coating.
 The external skin (GFRC) to be omitted and the pattern of adjacent façade to be
replicated with ceramic frit on the glazing.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 104
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The above proposals offer suitable levels of blast resistance providing that the support
conditions are carefully designed to resist the ultimate load of the façade and so long as the
glazing is laminated (using a makeup suitable to meet the blast requirements).

However, we do not expect the façade to provide equivalent levels of attack resistance
compared to a GFRC panel. The façade design will need to consider the attack resistance to
ensure the design provides equivalent levels of physical security. For example the aluminium
mesh cladding will need robust fixings and may need to be installed in front of a block work wall
as part of the overall physical security strategy. Additionally the ceramic frit glazing will require
laminates to ensure blast and attack resistance. This may also include the use of polycarbonate
or SGP interlayers.

EWS 102/106 – Capless Curtain Walling

A glass façade mounted within a capless curtain walling system was originally proposed, an
image of the EWS102 façade has been provided below:

The façade will be used a weather seal and therefore will not be an insulated pane however we
will need to ensure that it provides a suitable level of blast resistance.

On this basis our recommendation is a laminated pane utilising pvb interlayers and according
to our assumed charge weights we recommend the following construction.

11.52 Laminate 5mm annealed // 1.52pvb //5mm annealed

This is based upon a square pane measuring 1000mm x 1000m, although it is understood that
the panes are likely to be triangular it was considered acceptable, at this stage, to consider a
simplified/more conventional shape.

Based upon the above makeup we expect the panes to crack but with very low hazard
fragmentation (please note that this information is subject to change in the event that the charge
weights are greater than originally anticipated) and the analysis assumes the use of annealed
panes which are more cost effective than heat strengthened or toughened panes of glass.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 105
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

We would expect the laminated panes to be framed using a minimum of 18/20mm rebate with
the internal rebate fixed using robust mechanical fixings. The anticipated deflection of the glass
panes is relatively small (less than 25mm) so the degree of shortening is limited and we would
recommend either a wet (silicone) or dry (rubber gaskets) glazed system.

AM 501 Calligraphy Fascia

The calligraphy fascia is located at the top of the vessel and it utilises a similar system as EWS
106 but the glazed pane has been omitted. This could be designed to offer sufficient blast
resistance however the calligraphy must be robustly fixed to ensure it remains attached to the
façade.

Roof Cladding

In addition to the vertical façade we have also considered the response of the roof cladding
which is referred to as RFS-301, 302 and 601.

RFS – 301/302 Aluminium Standing Seam System

No VE options have been proposed but we can confirm that generally standing seam roof
systems perform well under blast loading and are reasonable for use in the instance.

RFS – 601 Tensile PTFE Fabric Roof

The roof sheeting is specified as a PTFE fabric which we would expect to tear under blast
loading. This is advantageous as the ultimate resistance of the roof cladding will be relatively
low and will limit the maximum force into the roof structure. Furthermore we would not expect
the cladding to be life threatening if parts of it were to fall on to the spectators within the bowl.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 106
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The structural and façade engineers also recommend the use of a PVC membrane system as
an alternative to the PTFE roof as it offers a reasonable cost saving but with a reduced lifespan.
We understand that the yield strength of the PVC and PTFE membranes are relatively similar
and will respond in a similar manner. Therefore we would have no objection to changing the
PTFE roof to a PVC system.

We anticipate that the roof structure will received the following approximate blast parameters:

VBIED at 100m

Incident Pressure 5.5kPa


Impulse 68kPa.msec

LVBIED at 100m

Incident Pressure 10.9kPa


Impulse 196.4kPa

LVBIED at 300m

Incident Pressure 2.6kPa


Impulse 66kPa.msec

Based upon the above scenarios we would expect the roof cladding to resist a LVBIED at 300m
but we expect it to tear for the VBIED and LVBIED threats at 100m. The response of the roof
structure has been considered separately.

14.12 Structural Response to Blast

In addition to the façade analysis a qualitative review of the roof structure has been conducted.

The stand structure was originally conceived to be of cast in situ reinforced concrete, however
the VE exercise proposes the use of a steel frame above the level 01 concourse.

Whilst insitu reinforced concrete generally has a larger degree of structural redundancy, it is
reasonable to use a steel frame construction to resist blast loadings however precast concrete
floor slabs will require careful detailing to ensure suitable robustness (for example at web cleat
connections to the steelwork). The use of this form of construction is likely to lead to additional
structural voids, for example in the hollowcore floor slabs and steelwork, all of which will need

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 107
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

to be accounted for within the Void Register (required for all sealed voids in accordance with
SC guidance document for Void Detection), see below.

On the above basis we do not believe the main structure is particularly susceptible to blast
effects, providing that standoff is maintained (and structural connections are detailed carefully),
however the roof structure will require careful consideration.

We recommend carrying out a explicit finite element model of the roof structure in order to check
its response under blast, taking into account the ultimate resistance of the PTFE/PVC roof
cladding (as this will limit the maximum pressure which the roof structure will receive). An
analysis of the roof has not yet been completed at this stage (a detailed blast analysis of this
size will require reasonable computational effort) however the roof does not offer much
structural redundancy and is prone to collapse in the event of the loss of one or two key
elements. Therefore careful consideration must be given to the access strategy to ensure that
access to the roof structure cannot be easily obtained.

Void Register

The void register will be collated using the following guidance notes:
 Void Identification and Certification Strategy Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-1191
 Void Identification and Certification Procedure Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRC-1249

The guidance notes outline the strategy and procedures to be implemented in order to help
ensure the security integrity of venue structures and helping to ensure life safety in the event
that an explosive device of weapon is concealed within a void.

The void strategy document refers primarily to inaccessible voids and excludes accessible
voids.

The definition of an inaccessible void is:

A space that is permanently inaccessible once manufacturing, pre-fabrication or construction is


complete

Inaccessible voids are assigned one of the following three classifications:


Green – Low Risk

Detonation of a concealed device likely to cause minimal physical damage, injury, disruption
and reputational damage to Qatar and FIFA. Inspection and closure of low risk voids should be
witness by the contractor.
Amber – Moderate Risk

Detonation of a concealed explosive device or retrieval or weapons likely to involve danger to


people, property, commercial activity and reputational damage to Qatar and FIFA. Inspection
and closure of moderate risk voids should be witnessed by the Contractor and witnessed and
countersigned by the Construction Supervision Consultant.
Red – High Risk

Retrieval of weapons and/or detonation of a concealed explosive device with the potential to
cause severe structural damage to critical infrastructure resulting in disruption or cancellation
of events, as well as inflicting significant loss of life and serious reputational damage to Qatar
and FIFA. All high risk voids must be reported to the PMC security team prior to permanent

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 108
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

closure with the opportunity to witness given in good time. Inspection and closure of high risk
voids should be witnessed by the contractor and witnessed and countersigned by the
construction supervision consultant and security stakeholders or their representative. Security
stakeholders may supplement the inspection of critical voids through deployment of firearms /
explosives search dogs or other specialist search equipment.

Void Register

A void register will be provided once the Stadium Architect has detailed voids to an extent which
will enable a Void Register to be prepared. However a list of typical voids have been categorised
and listed below.
 Partition walls in critical areas such as VVIP and VIP lounge
 Structural cores
 Tubular steel roof structure which is a high risk element
 Risers throughout the stadium
 Column shrouds
 Tubular façade and roof steel
 Hollowcore floor slabs
 Ceiling voids
 Raised floors
 Ceiling Cavities
 Raised floors in PTA’s, STA’s, stadium control room, fire command centre, venue
operating centre.
 Lift shafts
 Zones above temporary accommodation structures
 Areas between the back of the blockwork walls and the underside of the terrace/plenum
at the edge of the floor plates
 Air plenums under seating.
 Diesel tanks
 OB draw pits
 Trenched services from the stadium to internal accommodation in the dunes

14.13 Review of Ballistic Threats

The ballistic threat is specified as being 0.44” Magnum (BR/FB4) which is no longer a common
ballistic round type and we do not believe it is particularly applicable to Qatar 2022.

Furthermore, we understand that the design specification refers to ballistic resistant facades
being required to the following areas:
 EWS – 101
 EWS – 102
 EWS – 103
 EWS – 104
 EWS – 105
 EWS – 106

Whilst it would be desirable, from a security perspective, to provide ballistic resistant glazing
across the external façade of the stadium we do not believe it is practicable. FB4 resistant
glazing is likely to be in the order of 30 to 45mm thick (for conventional glass laminates) and will
add considerable cost to both the façade and the supporting structure (previous analyses have
demonstrated that the façade will require an 11.5mm annealed laminate in order to resist the
blast loading).

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 109
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

We would not recommend providing ballistic resistant glazing to the whole external façade of
the structure. Instead we would limit it to only critical areas such as:
 Enclosed part of the VVIP area.
 Emir’s route from his car to the Royal Box
 VVIP Safe Haven(s).
 Venue Operations Centre (VOC)
 Security Control Room (SCR).
 In order to achieve the FB4 requirement (threat level yet to be confirmed) can be
achieved using conventional forms of construction, for example:
 Blockwork walls to be constructed from dense concrete blocks and a minimum of 100mm
thick
 Studwork walls to be lined with either 5mm thick mild steel plate (1No) or two sheets of
3mm thick. The steelwork can be subsequently lined with plasterboard in order to
achieve a finishing coat.

The above forms of construction, which utilise conventional forms of construction, are cost
effective and readily available in country. We would not recommend the use of armoured steel
or other proprietary ballistic resistant systems as they are more costly and less readily available.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 110
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15 VE of Electrical Engineering including ICT Analysis and Code Compliance

15.1 Purpose of the Report and Basis of Validation

The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of electrical systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention of validating that the
original design is in complete compliance with relevant international standards, regulations and
recommended design practices and as/or modified by local practice and code requirements of
Qatar and to meet the FIFA and Supreme Committee requirements of constructability,
modularity and performance.

15.1.1 Power Demand - Reduction of power demand

The system information is provided in the electrical engineering Report, Electrical Typical
Medium voltage switchboards schematic, Supreme Committee -Precinct + Stadium Electrical
Design Concept and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs, however, there is Insufficient
data provided for the basis of power demand load assumptions (lighting, power, CT, A/V, food
services, HVAC, FP, etc.).

In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand (MD) for the Stadium power
requirements at schematic design is approximately 21 MVA and the estimated standby
electrical maximum demand is approximately 12 MVA. The Stadium has four substations with
electrical power demand loads as follows:
Substation 1: Total MD = 5,693 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 2: Total MD = 5,256 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 3: Total MD = 5,031 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 4: Total MD = 5,112 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)

Substation 1 and 2 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 1350 KVA each, whereas
substation 3 and 4 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 650 KVA each.

The original design for power demand load assumption is based on the summary of electrical
load split table (The essential and non-essential load), The employer’s requirements,1.1
Annexure 1 –Status of Design comment ID: C01-MEP3-025

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) reduces the total power demand load of the project to 15.5 MVA
and standby power demand load to 10.8 MVA, which includes the life safety loads, IT, ELV and
cooling load. This leads to a potential saving in the number of the transformers, generators and
related electrical spatial criteria.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 111
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for VE

Total Total Total


No of No of
Legacy area power Demand power Demand
Transforme Generators
requirements Demand Factor Connected standby Load
rs (Life safety)
Load (KVA) Load (KVA) (KVA)

4 1 set
Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 836.73
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 772.50
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 739.43
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 751.34
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
TOTAL 15500.00 20357.08 3100.00

For power demand load and stand by load details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary
breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design
and for revised space planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required
plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design.

Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% for power demand load and
10% for standby power load due to reduction in built up area and cooling load. Hence the total
number of transformers reduced by 30% and the LV generator (life safety) size updates to
1000KVA for each substation.

15.1.2 Incoming Power Distribution Medium Voltage (MV) – Reduction of MV panels, MV


room areas and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the electrical engineering Report, Electrical Typical
Medium voltage switchboards schematic, Supreme Committee -Precinct + Stadium Electrical
Design Concept and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs. However, the 11 KV Cable sizes
and LV Cable lengths are not shown on the drawings.

In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements is approximately 21 MVA. The original design proposes the incoming MV power
distribution to the stadium. This includes connection from two networks via KAHRAMAA owned
switchgear arrangement. Each source (A or B) of 132KV have a capacity to individually support
the entire stadium load. Additionally, and for enhanced resilience, each source will also have
two supplies (A1/A2 and B1/B2) each capable of supplying 100% of the stadium.

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, discussion with KAHRAMAA for the system details will be undertaken. The
Medium voltage (MV) Scheme will have to be coordinated and agreed upon by KAHRAMAA as
per the revised power demand load for the Stadium.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 112
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% for power demand load and
10% for standby power load due to reduction in built area and cooling load. Hence each MV
panel size will be reduced by 26%

15.1.3 Energy management system (EMS) - Deletion

The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1
,2,3&4, Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1,2,3&4 and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs, however, KAHRAMAA meters/ energy meters’ schematic is not shown
on the drawings.

In the original design, the energy management system (EMS) meets the requirement of GSAS
for remote reading of power meters throughout the building. The EMS will comprise network
multifunctional energy and power quality metering for power, lighting and process loads
throughout the facility. The system will be IP based and fully integrated with other systems on
the network. The Low Voltage (LV) switchboards will be equipped with integral KAHRAMAA
meters.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, KAHRAMAA meters will be designed as per KAHRAMAA requirements.


The energy management system is not required to achieve GSAS 4 star Certification. Hence it
will be removed.

Conclusion – The cost for installing an energy management system (EMS) can be eliminated.

15.1.4 Transformers – Reduction of no of transformer, transformer room areas and


selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4.

In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements at schematic design is approximately 21 MVA. The Stadium has four substations
located as per the following:

Substations 1 &4 located at Basement floor B2 level

Substations 2&3 located at Basement floor B3 level.


 Substation 1: Total MD = 5,693 KVA, 3 Transformers (Tournament Non- Essential) +
3Transformers (Tournament Essential) + 3 Transformers (Tournament Essential back
up)
 Substation 2: Total MD = 5,256 KVA, 3 Transformers (Tournament Non- Essential) + 3
Transformers (Tournament Essential) +3Transformers (Tournament Essential back up)
 Substation 3: Total MD = 5,031 KVA, 3 Transformers (Tournament Non- Essential) +
3 Transformers (Tournament Essential) +3Transformers (Tournament Essential back
up)
 Substation 4: Total MD = 5,112 KVA, 3 Transformers (Tournament Non- Essential) +
3 Transformers (Tournament Essential) +3Transformers (Tournament Essential back
up)

Transformer equipment sizes are generally based on 1600KVA, with allowance of 20% spare
capacity.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 113
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA, international code, and FIFA requirements.
There are no specific supreme committee requirements.

In the VE proposal, the number of transformers is reduced by 30% based on the updated power
demand load due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) and further reduction in the substations electrical spatial criteria.

The four substations will be relocated to the pitch level 0 and the total power demand load and
number of transformers will be updated as follows:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for VE

Total Total
Total
power Demand No of
VE area Demand power No of
Demand standby Generators
requirements Factor Connected Transformers
Load Load (Life safety)
Load (KVA)
(KVA) (KVA)

Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 4 (1600KVA) 836.73 1 set (1000KVA)


Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 4 (1600KVA) 772.50 1 set (1000KVA)
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 4 (1600KVA) 739.43 1 set (1000KVA)
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 4 (1600KVA) 751.34 1 set (1000KVA)
15500.0
TOTAL 20357.08 3100.00
0

For no of transformers details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary breakdown of the electrical
load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design and for revised space
planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on
the original and VE Option design.

Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% due to reduction in built
area and cooling load. The total area for substation1, 2, 3&4 can be reduced by 10-15% due to
reduction in built up area and cooling load this will result in reduced 30% numbers of the
transformers.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.5 11 KV Generators (100% Redundancy) and LV Standby power (Life safety


generators). – Reduction of standby power demand load

The system information is provided in the 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs and Low
voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4. However, the MV generators sizes
are not shown on the drawings.

In the original design, the estimated standby electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements is approximately 12 MVA, in addition to the KAHRAMAA primary source, standby
comprising MV generator back up will be provided for the stadium site but located outside the
site boundary (in the overlay area).

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 114
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The summary of electrical load split table for basis of demand load assumption (The essential
and non-essential load) was designed based on The employer’s requirements ,1.1 Annexure 1
–Status of Design comment ID: C01-MEP3-025

In the original design, the standby power capacity will support event critical and life safety
systems during failure of the incoming arrangement. The temporary 11 KV generators provided
within the precinct overlay will provide supply failure backup to all the event essential and life
safety supplies. These generators will not run in parallel to the utility supply and will be stepped
down through dedicated transformers separately and connected into the system on the LV
boards’ side. Additionally, permanent LV diesel powered generators adjacent to the four
substations, will provide 3 hours of backup to all life safety loads should both the mains and MV
generators fail.

In the original design, The MV generators are sized for N+1 and interlinked with the adjacent
substations. Substation 1&2 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 1350 KVA each,
whereas substation 3 and 4 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 650 KVA each.

The original design complies with the KAHRAMAA, Qatar civil defence, international codes, and
FIFA requirements. There are no specific supreme committee requirements.

The original design for Life safety meets KAHRAMAA requirement, however, discussion with
KAHRAMAA & QCDD for the system details will be required to be undertaken.

In the VE proposal, the original design for LV generators and temporary 11 KV generators will
retained, however, the sizes of generators will be resized based on the updated standby power
demand load due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical). Further reduction in the generators electrical special criteria.

In the VE proposal, the temporary 11 KV generators will be supplied by others for temporary
installation to operate and supply the electrical loads for Event essential load, Event critical load
and Event non-essential. However, the LV generators will be supplied by the contractor for
permanent installation within the Stadium to operate and supply the electrical loads within 10
seconds for all Life safety equipment including but not limited to life safety mechanical
equipment, fire alarm and detection systems, IT loads, selected elevators and escalators for
firefighting.

The four substations will be relocated to the pitch level 0 and the total standby power demand
load and no of generators will be updated as per the follows:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for VE

Total Total
Total
power Demand No of
VE area Demand power No of
Demand standby Generators
requirements Factor Connected Transformers
Load Load (Life safety)
Load (KVA)
(KVA) (KVA)

Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 4 (1600KVA) 836.73 1 set (1000KVA)


Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 4 (1600KVA) 772.50 1 set (1000KVA)
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 4 (1600KVA) 739.43 1 set (1000KVA)
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 4 (1600KVA) 751.34 1 set (1000KVA)
15500.0
TOTAL 20357.08 3100.00
0

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 115
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

For standby power demand load details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary breakdown of the
electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.

Conclusion –

The MV generators will be resized based on 10.5 MVA.

The Substation 1, 2, 3&4 will have one LV generator (life safety) resized for 1000 KVA each.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.6 Low voltage (LV) power distribution – Reduction of LV power distribution , LV


room areas , selection of alternate material and additional of 2 hours fire rated
cables.

The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4.

In the original design, The LV distribution equipment serving the essential load and non-
essential load comprise of: main switchgear, sub main distribution, section boards, final
distribution boards and power isolators. The LV distribution equipment will be located inside the
stadium in a dedicated electrical /plant room. The cables supplying emergency loads will be 1
hour fire rated and routed in separate dedicated containment throughout the building.

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the Low voltage power distribution. However, the cables supplying the fire and life safety loads
will have 2 hours fire rated in lieu of 1 hour to comply with NFPA and Qatar civil defence
requirements.

For revised space planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant
spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design.

Conclusion –

The total cost of Low voltage power distribution system will be reduced by 20-30%.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

By using 2 hours fire rated in lieu of 1 hour, the cable cost will increase by 20-30%.

15.1.7 Power factor correction capacitors – Reduction of power factor correction sizes
and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4

In the original design, the power factor correction capacitors equipment is sized based on the
assumed power factor and load the equipment served, so as to correct the power factor to 0.95.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 116
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The power factor correction equipment will be located inside the stadium in a dedicated
electrical /plant rooms.

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the power factor correction capacitors based on the assumed power factor. A further reduction
will be achieved due to correct the power factor capacitors to 0.9 in lieu of 0.95.

Conclusion –

The total cost of the power factor correction capacitors system based on 0.9 in lieu of 0.95 will
be reduced by 20-30%

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.8 Rising Bus bar / Cables – Reduction of busbar/cables lengths and selection of
alternate material

The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4

In the original design, the rising main bus bars will be installed in the 8 nos electrical service
risers included within the Stadium. The rising bus bars will include vertical power for non-
essential and essential services thoughtout the Stadium at all levels. The voltage drop permitted
is 2.5% from the transformer secondary terminals to the furthest point in the installation.

In the original design, the generators will be connected to the life safety LV main switchboards
by multicore armoured cable/bus bar. The LV cables from the transformer secondary side will
be single core copper conductor /bus bar. The downstream cables from the main LV panel to
sub main distribution board will be multi core copper conductor, XLPE, steel wire armoured.

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.

Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the numbers and the sizes of the Bus bar /Cables will
be reduced by 20 to 30%.

Conclusion, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of the Bus bar /Cables will be reduced by 20 to
30%.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 117
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15.1.9 Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) – Reduction of batteries size and selection of
alternate material

The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs, however the uninterrupted power supply (UPS) schematic is not shown
on the drawings.

In the original design, The Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) will be included to serve the
stadium venue operations center, venue operations centers service, pitch sport lighting and
other systems (extra low voltage /IT) in the event of main supply failure. The UPS will supply all
the equipment in these control rooms for a period of 10 minutes or until the generator has taken
up the load and will be installed within electrical /plant rooms. The UPS systems will serve:
 Field of play lighting 4x210 KW for 10 minutes
 Emir suite-1x50KW for 10 minutes
 VOC-1x30KW for 10 minutes
 Main communication room(PTA) -2x150KW for 10 minutes

The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the UPS and the batteries which will be reduced. A further reduction in UPS batteries sizes for
a period of 5 minutes in lieu of 10 minutes, will help to reduce the size of the battery room space
and battery cost.

Conclusion –The total cost of the UPS and batteries equipments based on a period of 5 minutes
in lieu of 10 minutes will reduce by 30 to 40%

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.10 Grounding system – Reduction and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, Low voltage earthing
schematic zone 1, 2, 3&4 and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs.

In the original design, the main earthing system of the building will be a TNS system. The main
MV and LV earth bar will be included in each substation and will be wall mounted in an
accessible location. The clean and functional earthing system will be included for
commissioning of bonding selected equipment and systems for a clean network in each
communications room, incoming telecom room, plant rooms and where required for specific
items of equipments.

The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no substantial saving in the grounding system.

Conclusion –

By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-15%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 118
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15.1.11 Lightning Protection system - Reduction and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, lightning protection
plans and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs

In the original design, the lightning protection will include an ‘enhanced’ voltage protection level
applied to incoming telecommunications and power services to prevent damage to electrical
and electronic system within the stadium. The original design is considered the conventional
lightning protection system (Faraday Cage LPS) with lightning protection level (LPL1) in
accordance with the risk assessment completed to BS EN 62305-2.

In the original design, the LV switchboards will be equipped with integral voltage surge
suppression. The LV switchboards will have surge protection to zones1, 2 and 3 equipment and
the data /signal and telecommunication cables to protect the systems from external surges
caused by lightning strike or similar Interference.

The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, consider of the Non-Conventional lightning protection system (Early


streamer Emission System).

Conclusion –

Using Non-Conventional lightning protection system instead of the current conventional


lightning protection system will the total cost of the system by 30 to 40%.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.12 Cable carrying system (containment) - Reduction and selection of alternate


material

The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs

In the original design, the cable carrying systems (containment) incudes cable trays, cable
trunking and cable baskets in the ceiling voids. The cable tray size will be designed to
accommodate the cables to run with an addition of 25% spare capacity to enable future cables
to be installed along the same routes.

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international codes requirement. Neither
FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
cable carrying systems(containment).

Conclusion –

Due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling load (proposed
by mechanical) the total cost of cable carrying systems (containment) system will reduce by 15
to 20%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 119
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.13 Small Power- Reduction and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, Small power and
communications plans.

In the original design, the general power system includes the general purpose switched socket
outlets, socket outlets, fused connection units and power, isolators of ancillary systems.

In the original design, provide white plastic finishes and accessories for all areas unless
otherwise stated. Primmum area, reception, meeting rooms, lounges, boxes, restaurants and
VIP area will have a superior and stylish finish comprising a selection of bronze, polished brass,
stainless steel and polished stainless steel to suit the architecture requirements. Plant area,
areas requiring more robust accessories and external areas shall utilize metal clad or weather
proof accessories as required.

In the original design, the number of the power outlets, IT outlets, fused connection unit outlets
and power for ancillary systems is not shown on the drawings

The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements. Neither
FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.

In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of small power and wiring devices be
reduced by 20-25%.

Conclusion –due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of small power and wiring devices be reduced by
20-25%.

Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.

15.1.14 Renewable energy (Photovoltaic system) - Deletion

The system information is provided in the Supreme Committee - Renewable energy - schematic
design and Supreme Committee - Energy Strategy, however, the Photo Voltaic Panels
schematic is not shown on the drawings.

In the original design, the renewable generation proposes a total size of the PV array 1.2 MWp,
which generates around 1,650 MWh per year. Which is around 5% of the estimated annual load
(based on the GSAS assumed profile of 63 marches per year).

The original design for the PV array is 1.2 MWp, which splits the total array into 4 smaller arrays,
each with an average size around 300kWp.The selected preferred location for the proposed PV
Installation is on the main stadium roof with an approximate 6,450m2 roof area to be used.

The proposed design complies with GSAS criteria requirement. Achieving the Carbon Natural
2022 FIFA world cup is required to operate the facility in tournament mode.

On Site Renewable Energy Generation: To contribute the programme-wide GHG emissions


reduction strategy and support the carbon-natural 2022 FIFA world cup.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 120
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the VE proposal, the Photo Voltaic Panels are not required to achieve GSAS 4 star
Certification. Hence it will be removed in the new design.

Conclusion – The cost for providing and installing Photovoltaic system can be eliminated.

15.1.15 Alternative vendors- Reduction and selection of alternate material

The system information is provided in the100% schematic Design-Approved vendor list

In the original design, all electrical equipment and systems is specified based on USA / Japan/
UK brands.

The original vendor list complies with the international code requirements.

In the VE proposal, Consider using alternative products (Chinese, Indian, east European) which
have lower cost but of equal quality.

Conclusion –By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%.

15.2 Lighting System

15.2.1 External Feature lighting – Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.1. No


drawings provided.

Includes Vessel wash lighting, Roof graze lighting.

No specific FIFA and SC requirement.

Lighting of the Exterior Vessel

In the original design, Mashrabiya evenly washed by LED floodlights installed on two concentric
rings of lighting columns.

In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternatives products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%

Lighting of the Interior Vessel

In the original design, Back-lighted panels that are located behind the openings in the ceiling or
windows in the façade. Lighting the interior of the bowl to twice the light level of the exterior,
175 lux to 150 lux.

In the VE proposal, lighting of the interior of the vessel is not recommended. Only external
façade should be lit.

Conclusion – Remove lighting specified to illuminate the interior of the Vessel. It is extra cost
and Energy consumption. 100% saving in the cost of Lighting for the Interior Vessel.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 121
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Roof Graze Lighting

Lit by floodlight columns mounted in a ring near the inner edge of the roof.

In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternatives products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%

15.2.2 Interior Lighting - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.2 and


drawings provided.

In the original design, lighting levels mentioned. Lighting design strategy in all main areas
narrated in the report. Lighting cut sheet provided. Sufficient information provided on Interior
lighting design and no further comments.

No specific FIFA and SC requirement. CIBSE lux level complied.

In the VE proposal, lighting design will be reviewed and no of light fitting will be optimized
wherever possible. Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%

15.2.3 Field of Play Lighting – No reduction

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.3 and


drawings provided. Detailed narrative and design provided.

In the original design, lighting design is Very good. The design includes 100% of the playing
Field.

The proposed design complies with international code requirements, FIFA requirements and
the supreme committee requirement

In the VE proposal, FIFA Minimal requirement provided. No recommendation for VE on this


item.

Conclusion - No reduction

15.2.4 Pitch Grow Lighting – Deleting the system

In the original design, permanent pitch grow lighting solution is provided.

The proposed design complies with international codes requirement, FIFA requirements and
the supreme committee requirement

In the VE proposal, FIFA Minimal requirement provided. It can be hired on a temporary basis.

Conclusion – By hiring the pitch grow lighting the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 122
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15.2.5 House lighting - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.4 and


layouts provided.

In the original design, the house lighting will serve to complement and enhance the architectural
form of the Stadium, especially when the field of play lighting is not in use.

No specific FIFA and SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced by
20-30%

15.2.6 Lighting Control - Reduction in material cost and Dali controls

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.6 and


drawings provided.

In the original design, DALI control (via interface to DMX system) specified for Plaza lighting
(including roof and Mashrabiya) and Field of play lighting. DALI control specified for Front of
house, Back of house, Plaza. Dimmable luminaire is specified in all areas. Lighting Control
Design is comprehensive and no further comments.

FIFA, SC and GSAS requirement complied.

In the VE proposal,
(1) Specified system from GE USA, ABB Sweden, Lutron USA, Electronic Theatre
Controls (ETC) EU. Manufacturer from East Europe or Asia to be considered.
(2) Alteration of DALI lighting controls in some areas to universal dimming FOH, BOH.
(3) No change in field lighting controls.
(4) Optimize no of panels as per the distance and location. Cost will be reduced by 20-
25% due to reduction in built area.
(5) Review the requirement for dimming controls in all areas where dimming is specified.

Conclusion - By using alternate products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced by
20-30%. By optimizing the design by above mentioned measures will reduce the cost by 10-
15%.

15.2.7 Emergency Lighting - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.10 and


drawings provided. Narrative description in Report and Layout drawings available. No
calculations provided.

In the original design, Emergency luminaires are powered by Central battery system (CBS).
Emergency Lighting design will be reviewed and no of light fitting to be optimized wherever
possible.

QCDD and NFPA requirements complied.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 123
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the VE proposal, Specified LED Emergency luminaries Like CEAG. East Europe or Asian
products to be considered subject to QCDD approval.

Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%

15.2.8 Obstacle (Obstruction) lighting - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.12.9 and


drawings provided. Narrative description in Report. No drawings provided.

In the original design, Aeronautical obstacle lighting provided on the fixed roof of the Stadium

Civil Aviation authority requirements complied.

In the VE proposal, specified LED Obstacle luminaries from US/ UK, manufacturer from East
Europe or Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%.

15.3 Fire Detection, Alarms and Life Systems - Reduction in devices and material
cost

15.3.1 Fire Detection & Alarms Systems

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.11,


Drawings provided for FOH & BOH areas and FA schematic diagram C01-FOS-D-STA-T-EL-
AL-AZ-7201.

In the original design, Fire Alarm system designed for the complete project with total coverage
and as per QCDD requirements. In the schematic Report- 13 Nos Panels are mentioned. In
drawing and BOQ only 10 Nos FACP are indicated. These panels are networked and supervisor
PCs are located in 3 locations – Event control center (1), Event control center (2) & SWOCC.
Fire Alarm layout for FOH & BOH areas are provided. Fire Alarm layout for concourse area are
missing (Notification devices). 72 hours’ backup battery is specified. 24 hours required as per
QCDD. Battery size can be reduced from 72 hours’ backup to 24 hours’ backup.

System required is as per QCDD and Life safety code and the proposed system meets QCDD
requirements. All devices and equipment shall be QCDD approved. FIFA and SC referrers to
QCDD requirements for Fire Alarm and detection system.

In the VE proposal,
(1) Optimize number of panels as per the distance and location. Since there is reduction in
total built up area, the number of Fire Alarm devices will also be proportionately
reduced. Number of FACPs can be reduced to 8 Panels.
(2) Use alternate QCDD approved vendors other than specified brands (Notifier USA,
Siemon USA, Gent UK, Honeywell USA).
(3) 72 hours’ backup battery is specified. 24 hours backup required as per QCDD. Battery
size will be reduced from 72 hours’ backup to 24 hours’ backup

Conclusion - There can be 20% reduction in number of devices and installation cost due to
reduction in total built up area. Also cost reduction in material procurement to be 20-30% if

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 124
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

procured from alternate manufacturer. Reduction in battery cost by 66% when battery backup
is changed from 72 hours to 24 hours.

15.3.2 PAVA systems

PAVA system includes sport entertainment audio broadcast, public address broadcast,
Emergency Voice Alarm communication and concert support within stadium bowl.

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.12.


Description of each system is provided in sections below.

15.3.3 Emergency Voice Alarm communication- Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.12.2,


Drawings provided for FOH & BOH areas and Voice Alarm schematic diagram C01-FOS-D-
STA-T-EL-AL-AZ-7202. Information provided includes only Report, schematic diagram and
layout drawings.

In the original design, Emergency Voice Alarm communication provides mass notification
information to the public and staff and will complement the managed phased evacuation
proposed for the Stadium in event mode. The PA system will form part of the fire warning and
will be interfaced with the Fire Detection and Alarm System (FDAS). Voice alarm Layout
drawings provided for areas except concourse areas. There will be extensive amount of
speakers in stadium bowl area and are missing in the design. No Quantities available.

System required is as per QCDD and Life safety code the proposed system meets QCDD
requirements. FIFA and SC referrers to QCDD / Life safety code requirements for Voice
evacuation system.

In the VE proposal, Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered. All devices and
equipment shall be QCDD approved.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30%.

15.3.4 Public address / Sport entertainment- Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.12.2.


Only report is available. No other design information is provided.

The original design includes the supply and installation for High power, high quality loudspeaker
systems to deliver full frequency range music to audiences within the Stadium bowl. The system
will provide the Audio broadcast to the Stadium bowl. Only report is available. No other design
information is provided.

System provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, vendors and products that meet SC Requirements from East Europe / Asia
to be considered instead of current specified manufacturers from US and UK (Philips Bosh
Netherland/USA, TOA Japan, Ateis Switzerland/UK, BSS‐Harman Pro UK) which are
expensive.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30%.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 125
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15.3.5 Concert support – Remove the system

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.12.2.


Only report is available. No other design information is provided.

In the original design, the PA system within the Stadium bowl is designed to provide support to
an external concert audio production system temporarily installed on the field of play to facilitate
concert use in legacy. It provides dedicated secondary audio network configurable for concert
sound.

This System is not mandatory as per FIFA & SC.

In the VE proposal, Concert support for the stadium bowl can be deleted from main scope.
Concert PA system can be provided by the event organizers at each event. Only infrastructure
required for the system to be provided.

Conclusion – The cost for providing and installing a Concert support PA system can be
eliminated.

15.3.6 Emergency Stewards Telephone System - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.13. Only


report and basic schematic block diagram are available. No other design information is included.

In the original design, the Emergency Telephone (Intercom) system has been provided to
secure communication between the Venue Operations Centre and the key stewarding points
around the Stadium. The system include a secure communications channel for match day, used
as a back-up to the steward’s radios.

System provided is as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.3.7 Fire Telephone - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.14. Only


report and basic schematic block diagram are available. No other design information included.

In the original design, the Fire Telephone system is to be used for communication between the
Venue Operations Centre and each main landing of each exit stairway and the sprinkler pump
room. The system include for a secure communications channel for use as a back-up to the fire
service radios.

System is required as per QCDD and Life safety code

In the VE proposal,
(1) Each Fire Telephone housed in wall mounted steel enclosure. QCDD approved Electro
Galvanized sheet enclosure to be used.
(2) Use alternate QCDD approved vendors other than Notifier USA, Siemen USA, Gent
UK, Honeywell USA"

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 126
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion – By using Electro Galvanized sheet enclosure cost can be reduced by 50%. By
using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-30%.

15.3.8 Emergency Voice Communication System (Refuge) - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.15. Only


report is available. No other design information is included.

In the original design, Emergency communication intercom system will be used for a means of
communication between all the fire escape refuge points on each level of the building and a
central control position at the Venue Operations Centre.

System is required as per QCDD and Life safety code

In the VE proposal, Alternate QCDD approved vendors other than Notifier USA, Siemen USA,
Gent UK, Honeywell USA" to be considered.

Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 10-30%.

15.3.9 Disabled Persons Alarm system - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.16. Only


report and basic schematic block diagram are available. No other design information is included.

In the original design, System provides facility to call for assistance using wall mounted call
buttons/pull cord from disabled people’s facilities including disabled toilets, disabled shower
rooms and Hygiene Suites.

System is provided as per International Building code.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

Referee Call System - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.7.17. Only


report is available. No other design information is included.

In the original design, Referees call system is provided to indicate to the players and Royal
suites when the match is about to start.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.4 ICT SYSTEMS

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 127
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the original design, Information communication and technology system includes of SCS, LAN,
Central clock, MOI, Mobile cellular infrastructure, DAS, SEAC.

Systems are provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

Description of each system is provided in sections below.

15.4.1 Key Spaces – Reduction in space and equipment

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.

In the original design, ICT rooms have been provided within the Stadium to accommodate ICT,
AV and enable the delivery of IP related services. Spaces included for MOI communication,
Cellular equipment room, Telecommunication carrier room, Radio equipment room, External
mobile / Radio equipment spaces, Primary Technical areas and Secondary Technical areas.

Systems are provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, approx. 2300Sq.m of space is used for ICT. Since there is reduction in total
built up area, there will be a reduction of 26% in the key ICT spaces

Conclusion – Cost reduction in ICT spaces and equipment by 20-30% inclusive of racks, power,
HVAC requirements

15.4.2 Structured cabling system - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2 &


Drawings.

In the original design, SCS infrastructure consists of Backbone Cabling Distribution, Horizontal
Cabling Distribution, Floor standing equipment cabinets and Data outlets. Typical schematic
and outlet quantity per room is provided. Cat 6A cabling is specified.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal,

1) No. of RJ45 outlets to be optimized as per FIFA & SC requirement. There will be reduction
in no of outlets by 20-25% due to reduction in built-up area.

2) TE Connectivity USA, Panduit USA, Brand Rex UK, Belden UK/ Canada, Corning Cables,
Siemen USA, Systimax USA specified. Alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be
considered.

Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 30-50%. The cost of SCS will be reduced by 20-25 % due to reduction in built-up
area

15.4.3 Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2 &


Drawings.

In the original design, WLAN coverage is provided in all public and back of house areas. WiFi
infrastructure provision (cabling, trunking, power etc.) only is included in the scope. Only RJ45
Outlets are provided. Access points and system are not included in the contract. WLAN outlet

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 128
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Layout provided for areas except concourse areas. Outlet quantity for WLAN are indicated in
the drawings. Cat 6A cabling is specified.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, No of WLAN outlets to be optimized as per FIFA & SC requirement. There
will be reduction in no. of outlets by 20-25% due to reduction in built area.

Conclusion – The cost can be reduced by 20-25 % due to reduction in built-up area.

15.4.4 Building Data Network - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2 &


very basic schematic Drawings.

In the original design, the building LAN provide a common transportation platform for all
operational systems requiring the transmission of voice, video and data traffic over an IP
network. All passive IT Infrastructure including structured cabling, cable trays, conduiting,
Racks, etc is included in the scope. Active components are not in scope.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, Cisco UK/USA, HP UK/USA, Juniper UK/USA, Alcatel Lucent UK/USA,
Extreme Networks UK/USA specified. Alternate manufacturers from Asia to be considered.

Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 30-50%.

15.4.5 Building Network Central Clock System - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2 &


very basic schematic Drawings.

In the original design, a central clock system to synchronize network based devices to a
common time source is provided. The system will receive its reference time signals from GPS
satellites and will distribute the time signals to IP enabled devices connected to the building
data network via access switches.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.4.6 Public Mobile Cellular System – No Reduction

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2 &


very basic schematic Drawings.

In the original design, the project has provided space, containment and power supply provision
for mobile operator to design, supply and install their in-building and external coverage public
cellular mobile solution at the Lusail Stadium. DAS system is specified. Only report is available.
No other design information is provided.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 129
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

Conclusion – Only Infrastructure provision included. No reduction.

15.4.7 Venue Private Mobile Radio System

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2.

In the original design, Four PMR systems are identified: Venue Operator TETRA system,
Tournament PMR system, MOI TETRA system and MOI 4G LTE system.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

Description of each PMR system is provided in the section below.

15.4.8 Venue Operator TETRA system - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2.

In the original design, Venue Operator TETRA system will provide Venue operations and
management team with trunked radio system to manage the day-to-day operations of the
Stadium.

Typical schematic and report is provided. No further design details is included.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% than US / UK manufacturers.

15.4.9 Tournament PMR system

Not included in the scope

15.4.10 MOI TETRA system & MOI 4G LTE system - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2.


Typical schematic and report are provided. No further design details included.

In the original design, MOI will require two separate PMR systems comprising of MOI TETRA
and MOI 4G LTE within the Stadium for their staff and personnel.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 130
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

15.4.11 Spectator Electronic Access Control System (SEAC) - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2.


Typical schematic and report are provided. No further design details included like quantity,
location etc.

The original design includes system to control spectators’ access to a stadium. Valid tickets
enable entry via automated turnstiles. Turnstiles and passive infrastructure are included in the
scope.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.5 Audio Visual and Multimedia

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.2.2.

Description of each system is provided in sections below.

15.5.1 IPTV System - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3. Only


Report and Schematic diagram are available. No further design details are included.

In the original design, the IPTV system will allow for distribution of TV channels and locally
produced video content (ie stream from the Press Conference Centre). System is provided in
SKY Boxes, VIP boxes, Concourse areas, Lobby area, Office spaces & Meeting rooms.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, Toshiba Japan specified. Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40%.

15.5.2 Hospitality Box - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.2.


Report, Schematic and typical room layout are available.

Designed for Luxurious game experience within Hospitality Box is included in the original
design.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal,

1) Optimise no. of Hospitality Box.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 131
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

2) Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA, Yamaha Japan.
Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - Optimising no. of Hospitality boxes and by using alternate manufacturers from East
Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.

15.5.3 Offices - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.3.


Report, Schematic and typical room layout are available.

In the original design, larger office spaces to be used for small meetings hence will be equipped
with displays with integrated speakers. Users can watch the IPTV content and connect their
laptops to a USB camera for video conference calls. Office spaces to be equipped with 42” full
HD/UHD display with integrated speakers.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal,

1) Optimise no. of offices with AV capability.

2) Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA, Yamaha Japan.
Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - Optimising no. of AV equipped offices to be done in detail design stage. By using
alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.

15.5.4 Meeting Room - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.3.


Only Report and Schematic diagram are available. No Layout drawings are included.

In the original design, the AV system in the room will provides Presentation facilities, Audio and
video conferencing facilities and IPTV display. 5 Meeting spaces provided with AV system -
FIFA GC meeting room, Match coordination meeting room, FIFA protocol room, Stadium
Operation meeting room and Conference room.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea,
Sharp Japan, Sony Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA,
Yamaha Japan. Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40%.

15.5.5 Press Conference Area - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.4.


Only report is available. No other design information is included.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 132
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the original design, the main purpose of the press conference area is to provide facilities for
pre/post-match media events and also used for lectures, video projections and corporate
events. Press conference area include Press conference room, SI Booths and AV control room.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.5.6 Digital Signage - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.7.


Only Report is available. No other design information is available in the original Design
documents.

In the original design, Digital signage system is deployed to provide static images and video
content around the Stadium.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, CISCO specified. Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be


considered

Conclusion - The cost can be reduced by 30-50 % by using manufacturer from Asia. Location
of Digital signage to be optimized during detail design stage.

15.5.7 Room Booking system - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.3.8.


Only Report is available. No other design information is available in the original design
documents.

In the original design, Room booking system consist of centrally located servers to support
authorised users to search available spaces and make bookings by room number, building
location or business function.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.5.8 Giant Screen - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 4.14.5.


Report, Schematic diagram and Control room layout is available.

In the original design, two Giant screens with Control room and all equipment are provided.
Control room layout is available. Screen details are not available.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 133
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the VE proposal, Draper USA, Dalite USA, Stewart USA specified. Alternate manufacturers
that meet SC Requirements from Europe / Asia to be considered

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.

15.6 BMS - Reduction in material cost

The system information is provided in SC-C01-CAF-FOS-RED-AD-00014 Section 5.10.9. No


details included. Basic system is described in the report. HVAC controls are missing in the BMS
section.

In the original design, the Building Management System (BMS) provide automatic control and
monitoring of all HVAC plant and equipment and monitoring of public health systems equipment.
HVAC control is missing in the BMS section.

System is provided as per FIFA & SC requirements.

In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.

Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 15-20% than US / UK manufacturers. HVAC control to be added and are a cost plus.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 134
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16 VE of Facade Engineering - Inhabit Engineering

16.1 Introduction

This section of the report provides value engineering proposals for the façade of the original
Fosters and Partners scheme. Inhabits main focus for the value engineering of the façade has
been reducing the vessel area by shifting the vessel profile inwards and reducing the height of
the vessel and rationalising the vessel façade whilst providing value engineering solutions
considering but not limited to the following;
 Material Selection
 Installation
 Specification Requirements
 Buildability
 Sustainability
 Tournament and Legacy Modes

Lusail Stadium Render and Section

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 135
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.1.1 Façade Typologies

The indicative locations of the façade types which correspond to the project specification are
shown below:

System Ref System Description


Structurally sealed curtain wall system including automated sliding door. Located on
EWS-101
the bowl, pitch facing
EWS-102 Capless stick curtain wall. Located on the Vessel.
EWS-103 Capless stick curtain wall Located on the Bowl.
EWS-104 Capless stick curtain wall. Located on the Bowl
EWS-105 Capless stick curtain wall. Located on the Bowl
EWS-106 Metal panel cladding. Located at Vessel
Box sections cladded with aluminium anodized finish and double glass unit. Located
EWS-107
at Bowl
EWS-501 GFRC ribbed cladding Located at Vessel
GFRC ribbed cladding incorporating double glass cladding. Glazed façade with
EWS-502
aluminium thermally broken framing.
EWS-503 GFRC ribbed cladding on concrete wall. Located to Vessel
EWS-701 Aluminium Louvers including insect mesh Located at Roof
AM-501 Roof Calligraphy fascia. Located at top of Vessel
AM-601 Aluminium circular cladding to columns. Internal through concourse
Glass floor 2-Hour fire resistant steel structure painted polyester powder. Steel to be
FL-901
cladded with aluminium painted. Internal
RFS-301 Aluminium roofing system - Standing seam
Aluminium roofing system incorporating gutter - Standing seam. System includes
RFS-302
Mansafe balustrade.
RFS-601 Tensile PTFE fabric top skin
RFS-602 Tensile PTFE fabric bottom skin
RFS-604 Tensile PTFE fabric bottom skin acoustically transparent

Further clarification of the Façade locations is identified below;

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 136
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.2 Executive Summary

Within the following sections Inhabit have identified the VE opportunities that are most feasible
given all considerations for each façade system, Geometry and Performance.

16.2.1 Façade Systems

Within this section Inhabit shall identify all each façade system and the proposed key Value
Engineering opportunities available at this stage and the risks and considerations associated
with said VE. Notwithstanding much of the focus has been around significant VE of the Vessel
façade itself.

16.2.1.1 EWS-101 / EWS-103 / EWS-104 / EWS-105 / EWS-107

No Significant VE can be obtained at this stage, however main VE for this system is as follows;

Remove Low-iron glass with a less expensive ultra-clear alternative.

Changing the Anodized finish to Polyester Powder Coating would provide a cost saving.

The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample.

The above VE would provide a combined saving of approximately 10% for this system.

16.2.1.2 EWS-102

This system is to be treated as a weather seal line only, therefore removing the thermal
requirement of the system, thus leading to a drastic reduction in material cost as Single glazing
can be utilised removing the IGU requirement.

The considerations associated with the above VE would be that the unit facades, “internal walls
and glazing” are to be the thermal line therefore potentially increased cost associated with said

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 137
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

walls, notwithstanding this cost of the increased requirement of the internal walls is much less
that the saving associated with reduction in a more complicated façade which is the Vessel.

The cost saving associated with said VE would be approximately 60% for this system.

The proposal for how this system shall be assembled and installed is detailed below.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 138
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 Single laminated glazing to meeting security requirements.


 A solid gold frit to the edge of the glass. The frit on the glazing shall provide the
aesthetics of extended triangulation.
 Glazing shall be structurally bonded to cassette.
 The aluminium gutter shall be fixed to the steel members within the factory.
 The aluminium cassette system shall be pre-fabricated into triangles and installed
“toggled” onto the aluminium gutter on site.
 Pressure plate installed after, providing additional seal against glass dislodgment in case
of blast, and provides fixing for feature capping.
 Caps can be installed at a later date should programme require. Mechanical fixing of
caps can be confirmed once Access and maintenance strategy is further developed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 139
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Whilst this proposal increases the glass area, this removes unnecessary interface complications
and variation of materials.

This system could terminate below the calligraphy band leaving the calligraphy mashrabiya
open and the roof area behind open to the elements, should this be considered a prevision must
be made to ensure that sufficient drainage etc is allowed for in this new external zone.

The risk associated with the above VE would be the potential overheating of the roof zone.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 140
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.2.1.3 EWS-106

Integrate into EWS 102 system. Please refer to EWS-102 for description and detail.

This system is to be treated as a weather seal line only, therefore removing the thermal
requirement of the system, thus leading to a drastic reduction in material cost as n mineral wool
to be used behind cladding panel therefore only aesthetics to be achieved from this system .

16.2.1.4 EWS-501

The VE that could be obtained from this system is a change in the material selection, Please
the specified GFRC with an aluminium alternative.

The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample as the overall aesthetics may be altered.

Dependant on the chosen design a poetical saving of 25% could be obtained for this system.

16.2.1.5 EWS-502 / EWS-503

Similar VE opportunity to that of the EWS-501 system with an additional VE of non-insulated


façade.

Changing the Anodized finish to Polyester Powder Coating would provide a cost saving.

Replace the fire rated glazed façade to each staircase with a different material ie concrete
allowing operable vent inserts in order to comply with QCD-FS requirements.

The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample.

Additional consideration must be made to the Legacy mode especially with respect to the non-
insulated façade, additional requirements may be required during this mode should the internal
use differ from that of the tournament mode.

An additional saving of approximately 10% could be obtained for this system dependant on the
chosen solution.

16.2.1.6 EWS-701

No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.

16.2.1.7 AM-501

Given the intent of the Mashrabiya no significant VE can be obtained, notwithstanding


consideration to the finish could be given, removing the luxurious anodised finish with a
Polyester powder coating finish. However Inhabit would recommend that if possible this system
remain anodized.

16.2.1.8 AM-601

Given the significant VE gained from other systems inhabit would not recommend VE be taken
from this system as the potential saving would be minimal and extremely differ the intent.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 141
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.2.1.9 RFS-301

No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.

16.2.1.10 RFS-302

No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.

16.2.1.11 RFS-601

The main consideration for the roof cladding is whether the roof itself is to remain following the
tournament when the stadium enters legacy mode. Without this decision being made it is difficult
at this stage to provide a validated VE solution.

It is Inhabits understanding that a VE concept of making the roof flat has been proposed, the
risk associated with said proposal is that the current design intent is significantly altered and
given the stadium in question it may be difficult be gain approval.

16.2.1.12 RFS-602 / RFS-604

The main consideration for the roof cladding is whether the roof itself is to remain following the
tournament when the stadium enters legacy mode. Given the sheltered location of this system,
it could be removed all together.

The risk of the VE is client approval, as it may be considered that the internal viewing experience
is altered.

Given the sheltered condition of this system a PVC coated polyester fabric solution may be
proposed should this system remain.

The risk of the VE would be that the design life would be reduced.

16.2.2 General

16.2.2.1 Geometry

Significant VE to be obtained through the Geometry of the vessel.

It is important to note, the top and bottom lip are intrinsically linked due to mathematics, if the
methodology of geometry in the contract documents is followed. The below mark-up
demonstrates this

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 142
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 143
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Below is a rendering showing the surface as per the original contract documentation in red,
whilst a best guess of the proposed VE surface is shown in green, note the appearance of
curvature will be less pronounced for the VE option as can be seen.

The new surface can be made / fabricated and in terms of area,

According to the script, the original surface area is 45,981 m^2

And the VE surface would be approx. 36,315 m^2

Approximate potential saving in area of 20%.

Other curves / a modified curve strategy could be investigated further investigation required.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 144
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.2.2.2 Performance

The below marked up section identifies the understanding of the design team with respect to
how each key area of the façade is intende to perform as a value engineered solution.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 145
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.3 Design Intent Key information

Within this section Inhabit have identified the current design parameters which form basis of
much of the value engineering proposals.

16.3.1 Design Report D2.2.1 SD

The below are extracts from the above report that are to be considered when proposing VE.
The double curved surface of the vessel sets the geometric definition and panelisation of the
facade. The facade is composed of flat panels which are supported by 3D adjustable brackets
off the steel structure. The panels are triangular along the diagonal grids to follow the warp of
the surface. The facade grid follows the steel structure and emphasizes the diagrids on the
exterior with feature clad elements. These elements are a visual continuation of the internal
steel structure. Primary and secondary steel members are linear (not curved) and set out on a
triangular grid arrangement to follow the curved geometry of the vessel.

The General Admission level finishes are practical and durable, a minimal palette of exposed
concrete or plasterboard walls and epoxy concrete flooring allow the golden vessel facade to
take centre stage.

We assume Precinct Security will deal with the following;

 The FIFA Outer Security Perimeter will be outside the Stadium façade but not on the
‘edge of the Stadium as described but limited to turnstiles
 The FIFA Inner Security Perimeter will be represented by the Stadium turnstiles and
aligned with the building façade and includes mag and bag
 300m Security Perimeter; No Large Vehicles within this on match days
 100m Perimeter. No cars or other vehicles within this without security clearance
 Outer Security perimeter to be Edge of Stadium to be Mag and bag
 Inner security perimeter to be the Ticket check and turnstiles Adjacent Building Security
dealt with by others
 LRT (Light Rail Transit) security dealt with by others

Iconic architectural facade lighting will be employed to give Lusail Stadium a different look and
feel associated with its unique architectural character; and highlighting of entrances and aid in
orientation to be a primary consideration.

In order to gain GSAS credits for review of environmental impact, light spill calculations will be
provided.

Façade lighting will be sensitive to surrounding uses and inhabitants. Tungsten halogen lamps
will not be used and wherever possible, LED’s will be utilised for architectural lighting as the
light source of choice as appropriate for the Schematic Design Stage.

Fire access roads, hard-standing, and fire access openings at façade will be provided in
accordance with QCDFSS 4.1, where access to a floor is possible from the exterior

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 146
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.3.2 Design Report D2.2.3 SD

The below are extracts from the above report that are to be considered when proposing VE.
The structure forms the skeleton for the stadium, supporting the bowl, roof and facade. A rigid
concrete seating bowl is held by concrete cores and columns, housing all of the terracing and
accommodation areas of the stadium. The roof is supported by tubular steel columns, each
oriented to meet at the apex and base, forming circumferentially stiff ‘V’s. After extensive testing
this system emerged as the most efficient solution.

The concept of the outer steel vessel system is to create the impression of a ‘floating’ stadium,
separated from the ground, a discreet concrete plinth supporting the structure above. The
triangular steel structure provides a strong starting-point for the image of the stadium to be
shaped upon.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 147
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The exterior cladding of the stadium forms the main architectural design feature to be seen by
spectators. This golden vessel not only provides a unique visual identity, but also serves as a
major element in protecting users from the harsh climatic conditions.

The double curved surface of the vessel sets the geometric definition and panelisation of the
facade. The facade is composed of flat panels which are supported by 3D adjustable brackets
off the steel structure. The panels are triangular along the diagonal grids to follow the warp of
the surface. The adjacent panels was designed as triangular panels to minimise the overall
number of panels and joints. The facade grid follows the steel structure and emphasizes the
diagrids on the exterior with feature clad elements. These elements are a visual continuation of
the internal steel structure. The facade is cladded with GRC panels with glazing at the plaza
level to allow views onto the plaza and beyond. The area could be glazed where additional
daylight is desired.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 148
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 149
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 150
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 151
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The architectural image of the stadium as a true vessel-like shape is greatly achieved by its
perfect integration with the roof.

One of the key drivers of the roof’s geometry is its relation to the seating bowl. A continuous
clearance band over the top of the last tier and the roof achieves a seamless spatial integration
and assists in producing a floating roof appearance.

The roof has a clear span of over 320m over the entire footprint of the stadium arena and seating
bowl without intermediate supports. The roof structure will be the world’s largest tensile cable-
net roof in a stadium. It has the form of a hyperbolic paraboloid surface, which increases
structural efficiency compared to a flat surface. The roof structure comprises of 48 radial cable
grids connecting to a large diameter compression ring at the perimeter, and twin tension rings
at the oculus over the field of play. The compression ring is supported on 24 points where the
inclined V-columns are tied to the bowl.

The roof cladding system contributes significantly in achieving players’ and spectators’
environmental comfort, as well as reducing energy consumption. Two layers of PTFE coated
membranes cladding systems reduce the impact of solar heat transmittance significantly, and
at the same time provides a cavity which reduces the impact of the hot prevailing wind on
thermal comfort. The design of oculus combined with the calligraphy band responds the
requirements for the wind strategy.

All services such as lights, speakers and access gantries are fully integrated within the roof
cavity, resulting in a unified and smooth soffit.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 152
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Current Specification

The table identifies the specification and requirements for each system in accordance with the
original design intent.

System
Specification
Ref
As per specification 84423, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84423, Low-iron glass (but indicated as clear on other
Section)
As per specification 84423, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-101
pitch 0.7
As per specification 84423, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84423,Double Laminated glass, Inhabits current
understanding of this requirement is due to a Ballistics requirement.
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low-Iron Glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
EWS-102 As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass Inhabits current
understanding of this requirement is due to a Ballistics requirement.
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Sound Insulation Rw 34dB
As per specification 84400, Thermally broken system
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-103 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-104 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-105 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 153
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

As per specification 74313, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K Walls


As per specification 74313, G-Value 0.2
As per specification 74313, Finish colour anodized
EWS-106
As per specification 74313, Thermally broken system
As per specification 74313, Sound Insulation Rw 34dB
As per specification 74313, Sound absorption material required at inner face
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
pitch 0.7
EWS-107
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
Specification 34900
EWS-501
Material intent is GFRC
Specification 34900
Material intent is GFRC
EWS-502 Aluminium finish stated as anodized
DGU specified
Fire Rated staircase / fire containment.
Specification 34900
EWS-503 Insulated Façade
Material intent is GFRC
EWS-701 Double Skin Roof
Specification 74313
AM-501 Aluminium finish stated as anodized
U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
Specification 74313
Polyester powder coating
AM-601
Minimum 3mm aluminium solid sheet
purely for column cladding
Specification 84423
FL-901
Not within Inhabit Scope
Specification 74313
RFS-301
U-Value average 0.25 W/m2K
Specification 74313
RFS-302
U-Value average 0.25 W/m2K
Specification 107353
RFS-601
Material intent PTFE fabric
Specification 107353
RFS-602 Dual skin Roof
Material intent PTFE fabric
Specification 107353
RFS-604 Dual skin Roof
Material intent PTFE fabric

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 154
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.4 Current Conditions

The current condition of the main façade consists of the “vessel” which surrounds the seating
bowl. The geometry and height varies around the perimeter, with signage along the upper rim
being Arabic calligraphy. A lightweight roof covers the seating area to protect spectators from
sun, heat and sand. The following sections of the report analyse the current design, and
identifies areas for improvement.

The Vessel

The Integrated Roof

One consideration for the project is that it is expected that after World Cup 2022 the stadium
enters a “legacy” phase where alternative uses may be sought, which need to be considered
and may allow for design efficiencies considering the change in building usage.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 155
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.5 Analysis of Current Design

16.5.1 EWS-102/EWS-106 – Insulated Triangular Panels with Glazing

Specification requires thermally broken system, sketch shows


thermal bridging

Sketches do not provide


for any secondary
drainage past gasket

Sketches do not indicate


any system for fixing
glazing back to
intermediate members

Unclear how stainless steel rod fixes to


mild steel hollow section. Design will
need to consider galvanic corrosion risk

Fixings do not allow capping to


accommodate movements between
secondary frames

Colour anodized aluminium finish is


more expensive but has less colour
consistency than PVDF or
powdercoated aluminium finishes

Sketches do not provide


for any secondary
drainage past gasket

Unclear how stainless steel rod fixes to


mild steel hollow section. Design will
need to consider galvanic corrosion risk

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 156
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A double glass unit with double laminated glazing for both the outer and inner pane is
extremely expensive for the following reasons:

 Triangular double glass unit are generally not sealed in the automatic line due to their
shape. Assembly these glazing manually has an important impact on cost.
 When ordering triangular glass the buyer will generally have to pay the area of the
rectangle which include the shaped glass. While some optimization is possible, given
the amount of glazing, the wastage will still be quite significant.

Paid glass surface

Actual glass surface

 Laminated heat treated glass (e.g. H.S. of F.T.) are expensive as the glass need to
be cut and then laminated.
 A monolithic laminated glass would achieve the required sound insulation (i.e. Rw 34)

For the above reasons replacing the double glass unit with a monolithic laminated glass would
as a minimum half the glass price.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 157
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.5.2 AM-501 Calligraphy Banding

Sketches show calligraphy is made out of


aluminium boxes, however the tight
curves of the calligraphy letter and
varying widths does not appear possible
with an aluminium extrusion. This will
probably need to be revised to lasercut
solid aluminium sheets with stiffeners.

Specification and scheme design report


note that provisions need to be made for
sand trap louvers and birdmesh, yet
sketches do not show relationship of
these elements to the frame and
calligraphy which could lead to variation
claims

Colour anodized aluminium finish is


more expensive but has less colour
consistency than PVDF or
powdercoated aluminium finishes

Specification only notes a 50%


perforation size, with no mention of
hole size/shape/pitch. This will have
to be carefully selected by architects
for aesthetics, as well as to prevent
“humming” when wind passes
through

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 158
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.5.3 Soffit Panels

Report notes panels are to be


acoustically attenuated, yet sketches Colour anodized aluminium finish is
do not provide any direction to the more expensive but has less colour
contractor of the relationship consistency than PVDF or
between the acoustic insulation and powdercoated aluminium finishes
the cladding or frame

16.5.4 EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503 Ground GFRC Screen and Glazing Ground Floor
Details

SD report notes a 600mm width has been allowed


for maintenance access between glazing and GRC.
Architect to verify access as has been provided to
the space between glazing and GRC

SD report notes glazing adjacent to the staircase cores should


have 30-minute fire-rating, but specification lists curtain walls as
having 60-minute fire-rating. The correct fire-rating needs to be
verified.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 159
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

No typical modulation of GRC or


glazing provided in either SD report
or architectural drawings for
tenderers to price and/or could lead
to variation claims. At SD typical
modulations should have been
decided, but only a discussion of the
constraints on the manufacturing of
panel sizes is given. This should be
more clearly defined to allow for
accurate pricing.
Desired sizing of perforations is not
noted any documentation.

16.6 Preliminary Value Engineering options

16.6.1 Vessel

 Simplify the Vessel geometry to allow for large panel repetition (i.e. reduce number of
different cladding panel types.
 Tournament Mode will happen in winter so there is no requirement for thermal insulation
on the Vessel façade. Double glass unit may be replaced with single laminated glass as
Bomb Blast resistance is required. Insulation material (e.g. mineral wool or rigid board)
can be omitted. For Legacy mode the internal facades (smaller quantity) can provide
thermal insulation and water/air barrier [EWS-106].
 Replace expensive colored anodized finish of aluminium claddings with powder coat or
PVDF 1.1.3finish [EWS-106, AM-501].
 Eliminate glass floors which may have additional fire-rating requirements.
 Eliminate the fire-rated glass curtain wall in staircase cores, and replace with fire-rated
solid wall (e.g. pre-cast), or reduce glazing area from full curtain wall to punch fire-rated
windows within pre-cast walls.
 Eliminate the GRC screen Type A (Ground Floor Mesh) and replace with expanded
mesh or pattern on metal [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503].
 Eliminate the GRC screen Type B (GRC screen in front of wall) and replace with
expanded mesh or pattern on metal [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503].
 Eliminate the GRC screen Type C (GRC screen in front of glazing) and replace with
expanded mesh or use fritting on glass to mimic pattern [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-
503].
 Incorporate bowl mesh pattern within fritting pattern of IGU for clear locations.
 Consider removing CWCT requirements, as American standards can typically be
concluded in less time.

16.6.2 Bowl

 The external façade is blast resistant to protect from an external explosion. Why are the
bowl façades blast resistant as well? Specifications Section 084400 require blast

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 160
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

resistant glazing for facades facing the pitch [EWS-101, EWS-107]. Most of these
facades include doors which are not blast proof.

16.6.3 Roof

 Remove lower cladding of dual skin Roof, which as only aesthetic function [RFS-602,
RFS-604].
 Explore reduction in performance of Roof fabric from PTFE to PVC coated polyester
fabric for lower cladding (not exposed to UV and less exposed to rain) or for both skins
[RFS-601, RFS-602, RFS-604].

16.6.4 Thermal Performance

 We note that .35 has been requested for opaque areas and 2.2 for vision, it is difficult to
assess the efficiency of these statements with respect to the building envelope
performance in the absence of knowing the areas of each of these items. This does not
appear to be a considered assessment
 This report also suggests to be Double Glazed and seems to be specifying minimum
performance criteria to suit local regulations without considering consequence of
weighted areas and values, proper evaluation is recommend of a project of this scale
and could lead to a lack of efficiencies and over design if not considered.

16.7 Value Engineering Options

16.7.1 EWS-101 - Structurally sealed curtain wall system @ Bowl

Façade type EWS-101

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 161
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

VE1 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE2 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting. In addition
to the cost, color anodized finish, normally shows a large color inconsistency. If this
inconsistency is not reduced to the minimum (with additional cost) then the final
appearance may be of low quality.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

16.7.2 EWS-102 - Capless stick curtain wall @ Vessel

Façade type EWS-102

VE1 – Non-insulated envelope


 This façade extends along the entire Vessel. It comprises glazing (EWS-101) and
aluminum framing (connected to EWS-106) with triangular shape. The façade has
double glass unit and it is specified as a thermally broken system.
 We assume that the Concourses are neither cooled during the Tournament Mode nor
on the Legacy Mode where an internal façade will be required. With this assumption the
Vessel façade would not require to be insulated while it will still be air/water tight and
blast proof. This means that the double glass units, which are double laminated for blast
resistant, can be replaced with a monolithic laminated blast resistant glass and the
system does not need to be thermally broken.
 A double glass unit with double laminated glazing for both the outer and inner pane is
extremely expensive for the following reasons:
o Triangular double glass unit are generally not sealed in the automatic line due to
their shape. Assembly these glazing manually has an important impact on cost.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 162
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

o When ordering triangular glass the buyer will generally have to pay the area of
the rectangle which include the shaped glass. While some optimization is
possible, given the amount of glazing, the wastage will be anyway quite
significant.

o Laminated heat treated glass (e.g. H.S. of F.T.) are expensive as the glass need
to be cut and then laminated.
 For the above reasons replacing the double glass unit with a monolithic laminated glass
would as a minimum half the glass price.
 A monolithic laminated glass would achieve the required sound insulation (i.e. Rw 34)
 An additional saving is given by using a not thermally broken aluminum system.

VE2 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE3 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting. In addition
to the cost, color anodized finish, normally shows a large color inconsistency. If this
inconsistency is not reduced to the minimum (with additional cost) then the final
appearance may be of low quality.

Façade geometry
 While a new proposal for the entire geometry of the stadium is under
development/evaluation by the team a general consideration of the façade geometry
has to be mentioned.
 The façade is clearly faceted (i.e. profiles and glass are not curved), however different
levels of faceting can be realized. Each of these levels/options will have an impact with
regard to cost and visual appearance.

The image above shows different options for the faceted curtain wall

 Every single triangle is a plane;

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 163
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 Three triangles (i.e. panels) are grouped together to form a plane;


 Nine triangles are grouped together to form a plane.

It is clear that the larger is the plane the less expensive is the facade, but also that the larger is
the deviation from the original design intent.

This item will be explored and developed in the next Report Issue.
16.7.3 EWS-103 - Capless stick curtain wall

Façade type EWS-103

VE1 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE2 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

16.7.4 EWS-104 - Capless stick curtain wall @ Bowl


 This façade is located at the Bowl, however we could not find exact location on the
drawings provide. It is constituted by an aluminium frame color anodized and glazing.

VE1 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE2 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 164
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.5 EWS-105 - Capless stick curtain wall @ Bowl

This façade is located at the Bow at the Media Presentation Studios. It is constituted by an
aluminium frame color anodized and glazing.

VE1 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE2– Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

16.7.6 EWS-106 - Capless stick curtain wall @ Vessel

This façade is located at the Vessel. It is constituted by an aluminium frame color anodized and
glazing.

Façade type EWS-106

VE1 – Non-insulated envelope


 Assuming that Concourses are not cooled means that this façade does not need to be
insulated.
 This means that the proposed thermally broken system can be avoided. The insulation
inside the system as well can be either avoided or reduced to achieve the required sound
insulation (i.e. Rw 34).

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 165
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

VE2 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE3 – Color anodized finish

16.7.7 EWS-107 - Box sections cladded @ Vessel


This façade is located at the Vessel. It is constituted by a steel box section cladded with color
anodized solid aluminium.

Façade type EWS-107

VE1 – Low-iron glass


 Low-iron glass is specified on façade EWS-102. We propose to replace it with less
expensive clear glass.

VE2 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

VE3 – Standard section


 Remove cladding and leave steel exposed. (Use fabricated section in lieu of standard
section)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 166
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.8 EWS-501 – GFRC ribbed Cladding

This is the vertical cladding at the Ground Floor underneath the Vessel envelope. It is
constituted by a GFRC “Ribbed” cladding.

VE1A - Replace GFRC with Expanded Mesh


 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or
Powder coating.

VE1B – Replace GRC with patterned metal cladding


 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with patterned aluminium painted PVDF or Powder
coating.

16.7.9 EWS-502 – GFRC ribbed Cladding with Glazing Facade

This façade is similar to EWS-501 and equally located at Ground Floor, however it has a second
glazed skin behind the GFRC screen.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 167
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Façade type EWS-502

VE1 – Non-insulated envelope


 Assuming that the Concourses are neither cooled during the Tournament Mode nor on
the Legacy Mode this façade does not require to be insulated.
 The double glass unit would be then replaced with a monolithic laminated glass.

VE2A - Replace GFRC with Expanded Mesh

Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or Powder
coating.

VE2B – Remove GFRC and use frit on glass


 The external skin (GFRC) to be omitted and the pattern of adjacent façade to be
replicated with ceramic frit on the glazing.

VE3 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.

 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.

VE4 – Replace fire rated glazed façade at staircase

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 168
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 This is a glazed façade at each staircase and it is fire rated. It can be replaced with solid
precast or with precast with opening to accommodate a fire rated window.

16.7.10 EWS-503 – GFRC ribbed Cladding at Concrete Wall

This façade is similar to EWS-501 and equally located at Ground Floor, however is located in
front of a solid wall.

Façade type EWS-503

VE1 – Non-insulated envelope


 Assuming that the Concourses are neither cooled during the Tournament Mode nor on
the Legacy Mode this façade does not require to be insulated.
 The double glass unit would be then replaced with a monolithic laminated glass.

VE2A - Replace GFRC with Expanded Mesh


 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or
Powder coating.

VE2B – Replace GRC with patterned metal cladding


 Replace the actual GFRC cladding with patterned aluminium painted PVDF or Powder
coating

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 169
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.11 EWS-701 – Alumnium Louvers at Roof

This is an aluminium louver system which may be resolved with an off-the-shelf extrusion so
that we cannot see any possible cost reduction.

Façade type EWS-701

16.7.12 AM-501 – Roof Calligraphy fascia

This is the cladding fascia at the top of the Vessel. It is constituted by aluminium cladding panels
similar to the façade EWS-106 but without glazing as infill element. The central triangle is open.

Façade type AM-501

VE1 – Color anodized finish


 The aluminum frame and cladding is specified with an expensive color anodized
treatment. This process is more expensive than clear anodized and painting.
 We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 170
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.13 AM-601 - Aluminium circular cladding to columns

This façade is located at the internal area of the stadium, however we could not find exact
location on the drawings provided. It is constituted by minimum 3mm aluminium solid sheet with
paint system.

VE1 – Exposed column


 The only possible VE would be to remove the cladding and leave the column exposed.

16.7.14 FL-901 - Glass floor

Glass Flor type FL-901

This façade is located at the internal are of the stadium. It is constituted by 2-hour fire rated
glass floor panels.

VE -1 Replace Glass with Solid floor


 While floor system is not in Inhabit scope of work, however glass floor may be replaced
with opaque material (i.e. stone or ceramic floor tiles).

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 171
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.15 RFS-301 - Aluminium roofing system – (Standing seam)

Standing seam roof is a common and economical solution for the roofing system. At this stage
we don’t see any opportunity for potential VE options.

Façade type RFS-302

16.7.16 RFS-302 - Aluminium roofing system – (incorporating gutter)

Standing seam roof is a common and economical solution for the roofing system. At this stage
we don’t see any opportunity for potential VE options.

Façade type RFS-301

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 172
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.17 RFS-601 - Tensile PTFE fabric, top skin @ Roof

This façade constitutes the top skin of the Roof.

Façade type RFS-601

VE1 – Tensile PTFE fabric to PVC coated polyester fabric


 The material specified for the top skin of the top is PTFE fabric. We are unclear at this
stage whether the Roof will remain on the Legacy mode. If this is the case we believe
that the PTFE is a proper solution. If this is not the case, so that the fabric will have to
last for a few years then a more economic (yet inferior) solution with PVC coated
polyester fabric may be adopted.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 173
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.18 RFS-602 - Tensile PTFE fabric, bottom skin @ Roof

This façade constitutes the bottom skin of the Roof.

Façade type RFS-602

VE1 – Tensile PTFE fabric to PVC coated polyester fabric


 The material specified for the lower skin of the roof is Tensile PTFE fabric. Considering
that the lower skin is less exposed to the environmental conditions (e.g. UV, Rain…) a
PVC coated polyester fabric, may be proposed.

VE2 – Tensile PTFE fabric


 Unless the lower skin as a functional purpose (e.g. acoustic, containing air flow directed
to the pitch, then the lower skin may be totally removed. This would have certainly an
aesthetic impact as it would leave the steel structure and any mechanical equipment or
device totally exposed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 174
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.7.19 RFS-604 - Tensile PTFE fabric bottom skin @ Roof Acoustically Transparent

This façade occurs at the Roof bottom skin of the Roof.

Façade type RFS-604

VE1 – Tensile PTFE fabric to PVC coated polyester fabric


 The material specified for the lower skin of the roof is Tensile PTFE fabric. Considering
that the lower skin is less exposed to the environmental conditions (e.g. UV, Rain…) a
PVC coated polyester fabric, may be proposed.

VE2 – Tensile PTFE fabric


 Unless the lower skin as a functional purpose (e.g. acoustic, containing air flow directed
to the pitch, then the lower skin may be totally removed. This would have certainly an
aesthetic impact as it would leave the steel structure and any mechanical equipment or
device totally exposed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 175
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.8 Façade Optimisation

This section of the report presents some VE opportunities for the external envelope. Generally
two approaches are presented:
 Review of proposed facade and show possible VE options within (or very close to) the
design intent (Classified as Type A)
 Proposal of VE items that deviates considerably from the original design intent
(classified as Type B).

16.8.1 EWS-501/502/503

These façades are located at Level +6.600 (Lower Tier Entrance). They are composed by GRC
panels, undulated large panels at lower level and four types of horizontal “baguettes” at upper
level.

There are three variation where the external screen is the same, while the background is
different:
 EWS-501: GRC supported by steel structure.
 EWS-502: GRC in front of glazed facade.
 EWS-501: GRC in front of concrete wall.

Each panel appears to be 3 meters wide, which corresponds to the support spacing. The
supporting structure is composed by vertical hollow sections (primary) with 2, 3 or 4 rows of
horizontal secondary member depending on the location (façade height).

It should be noted that the lower panel, expected to weight more than 500 kg, in some locations
is operable (bi-fold type).

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 176
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Type 4

Primary
vertical

Type 3

Type 2
Secondary
horizontal
“Baguette” type
GRC

Type 1

Undulated pane

16.8.1.1 Remove horizontal secondary members (Type A)

By changing the connection detail of the GRC panels the at least 3 out of the 4 horizontal
members (secondary) can be omitted. All the “Baguettes” are in fact connected directly to the
vertical member.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 177
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Omit
horizontal
members

H
Varies along the facade

The vertical member can be optimized as the span varies along the façade. The vertical steel
can be grouped in 2-4 sections in order to minimize steel tonnage.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 178
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.8.1.2 Façade details for GRC solution (Type A)

Horizontal
member
omitted

Curved

Horizontal detail (EWS-501)

Horizontal
member
omitted

Vertical detail (EWS-501)

16.8.1.3 Replace the GRC panels with aluminium sheets and extrusions (Type B)

GRC panel could be replaced with aluminium. This works particularly well when the façade is
facetted rather than curved. The “baguettes” would be replaced by aluminium extrusions (4 dies)
while the large undulated panel with aluminum sheets.

The larger extrusion (“baguette” type 1) would have dimension 160x275mm, for which the die
is feasible.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 179
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The limitation however happens for the undulated panel. This is 3000mm wide and 2575mm
high. Aluminium sheet of such size are not available. This means that the lower panel should
be split into two adding a vertical joint in the middle.

Primary
vertical
3000mm c/c

Secondary
horizontal behind
aluminum profile

Tertiary vertical
behind cladding

It requires as well a vertical tertiary vertical member at the undulated sheet joint.

Primary vertical
3000mm c/c

Secondary horizontal

Tertiary vertical

It should be noted that while this additional joint appears to be a major deviation, this condition
occurs even in the Foster’s design at the door.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 180
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Modulation 3000mm

Modulation 1500mm

Extract from drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-AR-AL-AZ-5402

This bi-fold door is quite heavy with the GRC panel and will require a fully bespoke system while
by using aluminium sheet an off-the-shelf door may be adopted.

Since the façade is curved aluminium extrusions should be curved as well the undulated sheet.
The curved extrusion is expensive and the curved undulated sheet is not practical. For this
reason this option works in combination with the facetted proposal described in the following
Section.

16.8.1.4 Façade from curved to facetted (Type B)

This façade is not straight in plan and it is show in the image below. The layout is an alternation
of convex and concave shapes with mainly two radii (31.840m and 17.860m)

R=
17.860m

See next
image

R=
31.840m

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 181
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Façade layout with concave and convex curves

The image below shows a facetted façade based on a 3m wide panels (i.e. as per the design
intent). For the larger radius the curve is still quite smooth with angle between panels equal to
5 degrees. For the smaller radius the angle is 9 degrees.

Proposed facetted panels based on 3 meters wide panels.

Of course by reducing the panel width (e.g. 2 meters) the curve would be smoother but this
would increase the steel structure density and eventually the total tonnage which may be totally
or partially compensated by the removal of the horizontal members (refer to Section 16.8.1.1)

The areas shown in the image above should be investigated further as faceting does not seem
to be an option given the small radius.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 182
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.8.1.5 Façade details for Aluminium solution (Type B)

Facetted

Horizontal detail (EWS-501) at undulated sheet

Vertical detail (EWS-501) at undulated sheet

Facetted

Horizontal detail (EWS-501) at louvers

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 183
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Vertical detail (EWS-501) at louvers

16.8.2 EWS-102/106

These façades are located approximately between Level +21.950 (Lower Compression Ring)
and Level +62.49 (Upper Ring). They are composed of steel frames, aluminium extrusions,
aluminium cladding, insulation and glazing.

Vessel Facade

The cladding system is referenced as two system numbers but given the same title:
 EWS-102 – Metal Panel Vessel Cladding
 EWS-106 – Metal Panel Vessel Cladding

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 184
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

This section will describe potential VE options to explore for each element. Independent
engineering calculations will have to be performed on any final sizing of framing elements. Any
sizing shown here is comparative based on the information contained in the final scheme
design.

The vessel façade is built-up of numerous layers:


 Primary Support
 Secondary Support
 Panels

16.8.2.1 Primary Support

The primary frame is made up of a double skin diagrid steel frame. Two potential VE options
can be explored:

 Option P1 - Eliminate interior frame skin along raking steel columns


 Option P2 - Eliminate raking steel columns and replace with 1 vertical column

16.8.2.2 Option 1 (Type A)

The raking columns appear to mainly only support the façade self-weight. Since most of the
façade load is on the exterior, the dead load will mainly be carried by the external frame skin,
little load appears to be transferred to the interior frame skin. This option can be further
analysed to confirm the stresses and deflection on the exterior frame skin when the interior skin
is removed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 185
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Horizontal Wind
Interior frame skin Load Truss

External frame
skin

16.8.2.3 Option 2 (Type B)

The raking columns mainly support the dead load that is transferred from the façade to the
horizontal wind load truss. The incline makes these columns less efficient for transferring dead
loads, since some load causes bending. These raking columns could be eliminated with a
central column to support the dead loads on the horizontal trusses. This would be a more
efficient design. The external view of seeing triangular patterns would not change, with the new
columns only visible from the inside. The columns would also run behind several windows.
This aesthetic changes internally and externally would need to be evaluated architecturally for
approval.

Eliminate raking
steel columns
Vertical column
(green) to support
dead load of truss

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 186
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.8.2.4 Secondary Support

The secondary frame supports the triangular cladding panels. Typically 16 secondary triangular
frames fit within the primary triangular steelwork. The scheme design estimates a steel member
size of 350mmx250mm RHS sections. It should be noted as this is a frame, it means that there
are two adjacent 350mmx250mm members.

350mm x 250mm x 6
Steel RHS

There are two VE options to consider to reduce the steelwork.


 Option 1 – add intermediate restraints to reduce the stress and deflection on the frame.
 Option 2 – interlock the mullions of the secondary frames, using a deeper narrower
section and a shallower adjacent section to reduce steel material.

16.8.2.5 Option 1 (Type A)

Currently the secondary steel is supported at the three corner points, leave the steel members
unsupported across their length. Given the long spans, on the order of up to 12m, 2
intermediate supports could be added to fix the secondary frame back to the primary steelwork.
The additional restraints would allow for smaller member sizes.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 187
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Below shows the effect of the additional restraint on the member sizes. This summary estimates
a deflection limit of span/200 on the unsupported member length.

With no intermediate restraints, the secondary steel frame is a series of simply supported
beams, uniformly loaded. For comparative and conservative analysis, a uniformly distributed
wind load has been assumed.

The deflection formula for a simply supported beam under uniform load is:
5wL4
deflection = 384EI w = linear wind load
1
L = total length of the beam
E = Modulus of Elasticity
I1 = Moment of inertia of current beam size

By adding an additional supports the beam becomes a continuous beam.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 188
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The deflection formula for a continuous beam with 4 supports under uniform load is:
0.0069wL4
deflection = I2 = Moment of inertia of option S1
EI2

By equating the two equations, and assuming the deflection limit of the unsupported length of
the beam is span/200, I2 (VE option S1) = 0.132I1 (original member moment of inertia).

The 350x250x6mm RHS original members moment of inertia is approximately 1.27 x 10^8
mm^4.

The VE option I2 becomes = 0.132 x 1.27x10^8 = 16.8 x 10^6 mm^4.

This would mean the member size could reduce to 180x100x8.

This could potentially realize a reduction of 40% in the weight of the secondary steel.

It is noted this VE option for the secondary frame is not possible if P2 for the primary steel is
chosen.

16.8.2.6 Options 2 (Type B)

The current design has each secondary frame triangle act completely independently. This
means both frames are the same size. If the frames interlocked, a more efficient design could
be realized to save steel, if each system interlocked to share the load, one frame could be
deeper (a more efficient design against wind load, with the adjacent frame being smaller.

A simple comparison can be made to determine if a more efficient design can be made to save
weight.

Current frame = 2nos. of 350mm x 250mm x 6mm RHs

2 x moment of inertia = 2 x 12616 cm4 = 25232 cm4

2 x Area = 2 x 70.2 cm2 = 140.2 cm2

2 x weight/m = 2 x 55.1 kg/m = 110.2 kg/m

Potential alternative = 1nos. 450mm x 250mm x 8mm RHS + smaller adjacent frame interlocked

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 189
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Major steel member


(red)

Minor secondary
frame

1 x 450mm x 250mm x 8 RHS moment of inertia = 30082 cm4 (by inspection this frame will
resist all the wind loads)
Area = 109 cm2
Weight/m = 85.4 kg/m

A preliminary comparison shows this could result in up to a 20% reduction in weight of the
secondary steel work.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 190
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Minor secondary
frame

Interlocking Pin
restraint

450mm x 250mm x
8 Steel RHS
Secondary Frame

The final design of the minor design would need to be determined at the following stage. But
an overall narrower sight width is possible, with a 20% reduction in weight.

Having different steel depths adjacent to one another may affect the aesthetic look and therefore
an architectural decision would need to be made if it is acceptable.

16.8.2.7 Panels

The panels are currently designed as a buildup of various elements fixed to the secondary
steelwork: cladding bracket system, an aluminium casing, acoustic insulation, main panel frame,
DGU window, thermal insulation, and frame capping.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 191
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The build-up is quite complex leading to a lot of on-site labour costs.

There are two options that can be explored in further detail:


 Option T1 – Aluminium Frame System
 Option T2 – Replacing the aluminium system with GRP and glazing

16.8.2.8 Option T1 (Type A/B) – Aluminium Frame System Optimization

To Be Further Developed.

16.8.2.9 Option T2 (Type A/B) – GRP system

Glass reinforced plastic (GRP) or glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) is a composite material
where glass fibers are embedded in plastic polymers (e.g. epoxy or polyester resins). It offers
a good structural strength and it is lightweight. This would offers an advantage of reducing the
secondary steel structure. GRP elements are generally moulded and can be produced in
practically any shape. Resistance to fire has to be carefully evaluated as not all resins are
suitable to limit material combustibility. Generally fillers are added to the main resin to enhance
fire resistance. Bomb-blast resistance will need to be analysed further.

Because of the molding process for GRP, complex node shapes can produced with smooth
interfaces and no welding or joints. Below is an example of a GRP mould of a node joint
between triangular GRP extrusions

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 192
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Triangular extruded shapes can formed to incorporate both solid cladding and glazing.

GRP Frame, Pearl Dive Centre, Dubai

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 193
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The photos below shows and example of GRP extrusions being used for the Pearl Dive Centre,
Dubai.

Interior view, Pearl Dive Centre, Dubai

Exterior view, Pearl Dive Centre, Dubai

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 194
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Below is an example of a cross section of an FRP composite frame that incorporates glazing.
FRP has better thermal properties than aluminium which would reduce the amount of insulation
required on solid wall panels.

GRP can be finished with a metallic paint to achieve the desired appearance for the Lusail
stadium or else clad in a thin 0.8mm aluminium sheet with the desired finish bonded to the GRP
panel.

GRP is cost-effective when there is a repeated pattern than reduces the number of mold
required. (This will work well with the proposed simplified geometry, shown below.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 195
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Too large for


transportation

The size of each large triangle (‘mega-grid) do not allow transportation of a single GRP panel
so that the panel need to be made into smaller sections.

GRP Frame
Panelization

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 196
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The current design involves varying the glazed openings depending on the curve of the building
envelope. Different molds of GRP extrusions can be produced to vary the size of openings.
Below images show an example of a GRP façade with varying void openings on a double skin
façade.

Exterior view, Eastland Shopping Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Interior view – Eastland Shopping Centre, Melbourne, Australia

At this stage we cannot confirm that this option would be less expensive than the existing
proposed design, but it is a viable alternative which deserves a further investigation.

16.8.2.10 System Assembly

The below tables summarises the potential system assembly approaches for the vessel façade.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 197
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Project specific
Type Pros Cons
Remarks
Given the vessel
Site installation time
structure this system is
reduced
Fully Unitised Expensive not preferable,
unnecessary increase
Pre fabrication,
in cost.
Site installation time
Some site
reduced This would be the
Prefabricated Cassette workmanship in most
preferred approach.
cases.
Pre fabrication,
Limited capability Drainage limitations
Stick System Cheaper system given the geometry
On site workmanship. requirements.

16.8.2.11 Material Selection

The below tables summarizes the potential material selection.

Project specific
Material/ Finish Pros Cons
Remarks
Aluminium Anodised Luxury Finish Expensive Specified material
Preferable material
Aluminium PPC Cost Effective Reduced aesthetics
selection.
Potential GSAS issue
as the material is not
considered
environmentally
friendly.
If moulds can be Should more moulds
GFRP limited cost effective be required to achieve Given all project
solution geometry, expensive requirements, sufficient
saving may be
obtained through a
slight change from
specified material to
aluminium PPC

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 198
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

16.9 Specification Value Engineering

The below table identifies potential VE opportunities that could be obtained through a reduction
in specification, the table also identifies areas that may need clarification in order to determine
any potential VE.

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Clarification on how the
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification average has been calculated
reduce the thermal
84423, U-Value to be submitted to determine
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K whether any further VE could
the IGU.
be provided.
further clarification to be
As per specification
provided on the low iron
84423, Low-iron glass Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
(but indicated as clear place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
on other Section)
potential
Many new options are
EWS-101 available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84423, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
As per specification
84423,Double
Laminated glass, Remove Ballistics Further clarification required
Inhabits current requirement to all pitch facing to Ballistics specification at
understanding of this façades. pitch facing facades
requirement is due to a
Ballistics requirement.
Treat the concourse space as
sheltered external and
replace the insulated façade
Further clarification on the
(IGU) with a SGU (single
intended concourse space
As per specification glazed) without thermally
during both tournament and
84400, U-Value broken aluminium system,
legacy made to determine the
average 1.7 W/m2K therefore treating the inner
true value of this proposed
façade line (retail / bars and
VE
restaurants) as the main
façade line with respect to
thermal performance.
EWS-102
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low-Iron Glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
Further clarification required
to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 199
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
As per specification
84400, Double
Laminated glass Further clarification required
Inhabits current to Ballistics specification at
understanding of this pitch facing facades
requirement is due to a
Ballistics requirement.
Further clarification to this
As per specification
value has been obtained in
84400, Sound
order to asses whether any
Insulation Rw 34dB
VE could be obtained
Integrity and Insulation or
As per specification integrity? Clarification
84400, 1-hour fire required to determine
rated whether VE could be
obtained.

Increase Spandrel area to


As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
The framing system itself
along with the glass must
As per specification achieve this rating. VE
EWS-103
84400,For VVIP and potential in implication of this
Emir levels: Ballistic rating.
Rating Class FB 4 Clarification required to how
this rating has been
determined
Further clarification required
to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.
Many new options are
available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84400, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
Integrity and Insulation or
As per specification integrity? Clarification
EWS-104 84400, 1-hour fire required to determine
rated whether VE could be
obtained.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 200
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential

The framing system itself


As per specification
along with the glass must
84400,For VVIP and
achieve this rating. VE
Emir levels: Ballistic
potential in implication of this
Rating Class FB 4
rating.

Further clarification required


to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.
Many new options are
available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84400, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
Integrity and Insulation or
As per specification integrity? Clarification
84400, 1-hour fire required to determine
rated whether VE could be
obtained.

Increase Spandrel area to


As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.

further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
EWS-105 84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
The framing system itself
As per specification
along with the glass must
84400,For VVIP and
achieve this rating. VE
Emir levels: Ballistic
potential in implication of this
Rating Class FB 4
rating.
Further clarification required
to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 201
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Many new options are
available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84400, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
Further Understanding to
As per specification
whether this is integrated into
74313, U-Value
EWS-106 EWS102 or is located at a
average 1.7 W/m2K
different façade line? I.e.
Walls
mashrabiya
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential

The framing system itself


As per specification
along with the glass must
84400,For VVIP and
achieve this rating. VE
Emir levels: Ballistic
potential in implication of this
Rating Class FB 4
EWS-107 rating.

Further clarification required


to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.
Many new options are
available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84400, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
No Performance
requirements provided,
Specification 34900 further VE could be obtained
should this information be
EWS-501 specified.
Replace GFRC cladding with
Material intent is GFRC aluminium expanded mesh or
pattern on metal
No Performance
requirements provided,
EWS-502 Specification 34900 further VE could be obtained
should this information be
specified.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 202
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref

Replace GFRC with


expanded metal mesh,
Material intent is GFRC
replace with patterned metal
or with frit on glass

Many new options are


available on the market with
respect to colour and finish,
Aluminium finish stated
depending on the exact
as anodized
anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
Replace the insulated façade
(DGU) with a non-insulated
DGU specified facade (single glass) without
thermally broken aluminium
system

Replace fire rated glazed


Fire Rated staircase / staircase with precast solid
fire containment. wall or precast wall with
opening for windows.

No Performance
requirements provided,
Specification 34900 further VE could be obtained
should this information be
specified.

Replace the insulated façade


EWS-503 Insulated Façade with a non-thermally broken
system

Replace GFRC with


expanded metal mesh,
Material intent is GFRC
replace with patterned metal
or with frit on glass

Double skin roof could be


omitted, especially should the
Double Skin Roof - decision
EWS-701 Double Skin Roof roof not remain on completion
to be made.
on tournament mode and
beginning of Legacy Mode

Many new options are


available on the market with
respect to colour and finish,
Aluminium finish stated
AM-501 depending on the exact
as anodized
anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 203
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
U-Value average 1.7 No thermal performance
W/m2K required at this location.

purely for column Remove column cladding and


AM-601
cladding leave columns exposed

Clarification on how the


average has been calculated
RFS-301 Specification 74313 to be submitted to determine
whether any further VE could
be provided.

Clarification on how the


average has been calculated
RFS-302 Specification 74313 to be submitted to determine
whether any further VE could
be provided.

Material intent PTFE Use PVC coated polyester


RFS-601
fabric fabric

Remove dual skin roof, leave


Dual skin Roof
exposed
RFS-602
Material intent PTFE Use PVC coated polyester
fabric fabric

Remove dual skin roof, leave


Dual skin Roof
exposed
RFS-604
Material intent PTFE Use PVC coated polyester
fabric fabric

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 204
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

17 VE of Roof Structure and Steel - OPS Structural Engineering

17.1 Roof Structure

17.1.1 Introduction

The original design comprises of a large circular roof with a small central opening, an option for
a retractable roof for the central opening and an inner (ceiling) liner, all understood to be
required in order to provide the correct internal environmental conditions to the bowl for the
tournament taking place during the summer.

Changing the seating geometry from a circular to an orthogonal grid permits a more efficient
seating plan which in turn allows a significant reduction in bowl size. Along with the change in
tournament timing from summer to the winter, allows the outside dimensions of the roof to be
reduced in size and the central roof opening to be bigger.

The original design of roof surface form and structure was also quite complex and opportunities
exist to simplify the arrangement.

In line with legacy requirements, the design life of the roof cladding can be reduced which allows
the material specification to be re-considered if it is decided to remove the roof as part of the
legacy option.

Therefore, the key VE items identified for the roof include:


 Adoption of a simplified membrane roof form
 Change from a PTFE to PVC membrane
 Redesign of the cable net for the smaller roof area with a “simpler” roof structure.

17.1.2 Key Assumptions

17.1.2.1 Loading

In the assessment of the alternative roof option, the loadings specified in Roof loading is
explained within Part D2: The Employers requirements D2.2 Schematic Design-Reports and is
shown on drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ST-RF-AZ-1100 have generally been adopted along with
typical generic load combinations.

In addition, the wind load indicated on the Roof Loading drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ST-RF-
AZ-1100 based on the Wind Tunnel Study has been used in the redesign of the roof structure.
However, due to differences in the proposed geometry of the two structures, it is unlikely that
the original wind tunnel values will be the same. A further wind tunnel model will be required
which will provide more accurate values as well as giving further savings. In the absence of a
wind tunnel report based on our geometry, at least with this approach a reasonable comparison
can be obtained rather than adopting wind loading derived from the design standards, which
generally result in significantly higher wind loads.

The geometric profile of the roof surface has been modified and no longer exactly follows the
original design of “Pringle” form, although the outside eaves profile (which is what can be seen
from the outside of the stadium), does follow a similar line.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 205
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

17.1.3 Membrane Design

The original design of membrane surface was created by a series of domes that spanned
diagonally across the roof bay. The radial lengths of the arches decreased the closer they were
located towards the central oculus. The result was a phyllotaxis type pattern to the surface.

Figure 17-1: Arup/Foster Membrane Roof

This arrangement required both a relatively complex structural support system, (comprising of
flying struts and intersecting arch purlins) as well as complex fabric panels which varied
significantly in size.

In order to simplify the design and in the process reduce costs, OPS propose to:
 Remove the lower (ceiling) membrane panel
 Change the PTFE membrane to a PVC membrane
 Use a series of arches purlins set out on a radial grid of equal spacing to provide a
simple and efficient structural support to the roof membrane.

There are no structural implications that would prevent the removal of the lower membrane and
removing the lower membrane would assist with access and lighting.

The change from a PTFE membrane again has limited structural implications, in practice it
should be ensured that the stresses developed within the fabric are within permissible values
for the PVC. The lower translucency of the PVC also helps reduce the heat gain within the
bowl. It should be noted however that the PVC will have a lower service life than PTFE.

The arch purlins have a rise of 15% the span in order to ensure sufficient curvature is developed
in the membrane.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 206
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-2: Typical Membrane Panel

In addition to the self-weight and pre-stress load cases the following combinations have been
considered in the membrane analysis:

Uniform Sand/Imposed load 0.6 kN/m2

Wind Pressure +0.5 kN/m2

Wind Suction -0.5 to -1.98 kN/m2

60% Wind with full sand

Full wind with 50% sand

The resulting membrane stresses are close to the limit for a Type IV PVC/PE membrane under
the wind suction case and we consider that at this value, a single uplift cable would be required
in the first full bay closest to the compression ring.

17.1.4 Cable Net Structure

The original design of roof profile took the form of a “Pringle” (Saddle). As a consequence, the
roof to the E-W stands was higher to the rear of the bowl and the roof sloped towards the pitch.
In addition to the potential drainage issues it resulted in a roof profile which could result in
greater entrapment of the external air as it flows over the roof. In addition, it would appear that
due to this geometry under uplift conditions significant movement of the inner tension ring would
need to occur in order to mobilise the uplift resistance of the radial trusses.

In the tender design the external radius of the cable net roof was 147m and the internal opening
radius 50.8m giving an approximate roof area of 59,770 m2.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 207
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-3: Typical E-W Section through tender scheme roof

In the currently proposed optimised bowl design, the orthogonal seating grid adopted allows the
overall radius of the roof to be reduced to 134.68m while an enlarged opening radius of 61.2m
was adopted for the internal opening, resulting in a revised area of approximately 45,218 m 2,
giving a new cable net roof area of 76% of the original tender design.

Figure 17-4: Typical E-W Section through Optimised roof scheme.

In order to reduce costs, an alternative (simplified) roof structure has been developed which
adopts a different internal geometry (although a similar external eaves profile is created) and
avoids sloping the roof down towards the pitch and therefore resolves the potential drainage
issues the tender scheme creates.

The preliminary analysis of this geometry indicated a potential saving in steel weight of around
4,000 Tonnes on the original tender tonnage (taken from the schedules on the tender drawings),
primarily in the weight of the structural steelwork.

The main reduction in weight was obtained in the structural steel elements of the roof which
may be partially be explained by the initial analysis not including all “out of balance” load cases
and therefore it is possible that the compression ring may need to be strengthened to resist
these effects.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 208
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A similar proportional reduction in weight could not be achieved for cable elements. This is
partially due to the importance that the roof geometry plays in the generating forces within the
cable (tension) elements and to the extent that a number of iterations will be required to get an
optimised efficient structure.

This is illustrated in the two roof options currently developed.

Option 1 represents the initially roof geometry given to Environment consultant Hilson Moran in
order to allow them to undertake the internal CFD analysis of the bowl in advance of the form
finding to the roof structure. Consequently, to ensure the roof geometry remained similar to that
used in the CFD analysis it was established that additional cable bracing would be required in
the face of the tension ring as well as high pre-tensions in order to ensure the geometry
remained similar to the form issued.

Option 2 represents a roof structure in which its geometry is allowed to change in response to
the loading and pre-stress applied. As a result, the tension ring moves up 4.5m at the lower
point and down 2.0m at the higher point, and while the pre-stress forces are lower, the
deflections are similar.

We would therefore recommend that further iterations of the roof structure are undertaken and
the profile be modified to take more account of the form finding process. This should result in
the reduction of the high pre-stress loads ensure a more efficient structure overall which would
lead to reductions in cable sizes and overall steel tonnage

An implication of this is that the revised geometry will give a “flatter” tension ring (i.e. the tension
ring is allowed to move down over the E-W stands and up over the N-S stands).

The results of the preliminary analysis under uniform loading indicated the potential saving in
steel weight could be in the region of 40% (i.e., greater than the 25% reduction in area).

Cables Steelwork Total


(Tonnes) (Tonnes) (Tonnes)
Arup Scheme 1173 8309 9482

Optimised Option 1 1018 4450 5467

Optimised Option 2 926 4450 5375

The connections and castings will require further consideration in order to produce a more
accurate estimate.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 209
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

17.2 Stand and Terrace Structure

The Arup/Foster Tender proposals for the superstructure to the terrace stands and
accommodation areas were generally to comprise of reinforced concrete. The initial VE
proposal was for a steel-framed construction above Level 01 Concourse however in view of the
legacy scheme it may be more appropriate to adopt a steel frame structure only above level 6,
although areas of level 5 containing large open spans and cantilevers may also be better as
steel instead of concrete.

The advantages for a steel frame are considered to be:


 The steel frame should be relatively easily to dismantled in the legacy stage.
 A steel construction can be erected and dismantled, in relatively short programmes
(when compared to a reinforced concrete construction).
 The steel frame would be prefabricated offsite.
 Precast concrete floor slabs would allow for fast erection and future demolition /
recycling.
 Steel frame structures set to an orthogonal grid are easier to re-use on alternative sites.
 The steel frame elements will better facilitate the connections from the steel façade/roof
structure, compared to cast-in connections required in a concrete frame.
 The overall weight of the steel framed solution is expected to be less than concrete
framed and therefore reducing loads onto the substructure.

Provisional comparative tonnage calculations are summarised below, and include for floor
beams, terrace beams and supporting columns. Perimeter columns and perimeter transfer
trusses are excluded from this initial analysis and would be investigated at the next stage,
should this option be considered.

For an East / West stand frame, a provisional comparative tonnage has been calculated to be
120T per 7.5m bay.

For a North / South stand frame, a provisional comparative tonnage has been calculated to be
65T per 7.5m bay.

Additional steel is required between frames for lateral restraint, service openings, escalator
openings etc. All steelwork is generally assumed to be grade S355 and all structural steel
members will receive a paint protection system and fire protection system where deemed
necessary. This will be further detailed in the following stages.

17.2.1 Floor construction

Slabs are expected to be power floated with epoxy coating finish.

Floor beam arrangements are required to connect to the concrete cores for lateral restraint and
to form the diaphragm action. The connections will be formed from cast-in brackets, with web
cleat connections to a steel beam around each core.

Two steel framed options are proposed for the floor construction of Level 02 and above
(although a similar approach is just as valid for a steel frame at level 6 and/or above).

17.2.1.1 Precast hollow core slab with structural topping

A 200mm precast hollow core unit with structural screed topping of 75mm is suggested to span
the 7.5m typical spacing of the terrace grids.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 210
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Precast slabs are designed to be installed without temporary propping. The precast units may
be considered to restrain the top flanges of the beams during the construction phase, though
care must be taken to load each floor beam symmetrically, and the finished slab construction
acts as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to the vertical braced bays.

Figure 17-5: Precast slab with slotted ends and studded beams for shear connection.

17.2.1.2 Composite metal deck slab

A 150mm composite metal deck slab can be considered as an alternative option, spanning up
to 3.0m onto secondary steel floor beams. The secondary beams are typically designed for
composite action with the in-situ metal deck floors for maximum structural performance. Primary
beams are designed as non-composite.

The direction of span of the metal deck floor is typically parallel to the primary floor beams.

Metal decks are designed to be installed without temporary propping. The profiled metal decking
is to laterally restrain the top flanges of the beams during the construction phase and the
composite slab acts as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to the vertical braced bays.
Provision of shear studs to all beams should therefore be included.

17.2.2 Floor layout

It has been considered that the maximum span of any primary floor beam should not exceed
approx. 9.0m to achieve an efficient structural design. At this stage, an 8.6m typical spacing of
columns has been adopted to cover the internal area.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 211
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-6: Typical bay of floor beams

 No heavy partitions are assumed for the VE comparison, where additional support
beams would be expected to be added to support any heavy partition line loads.
 All partitions assumed to be of lightweight studwork construction and constructed to a
maximum height of 3.5m with a timber diaphragm lid over.
 Additional steel around concrete cores for floor connections not accounted for.
 Double structure at movement joints not accounted for.

17.2.3 Terrace layout

The beam layout follows a similar format to the precast floor option above, with precast terrace
units placed onto a raking steel beam.

Plan bracing will be required at regular intervals to transfer the lateral loads down to the floor
diaphragms.

Figure 17-7: Indicative West stand (left) and North stand (right) steel frames

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 212
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The support for the cantilever section is primarily governed by the crowd induced dynamic
criteria, where the client requires capacity for a scenario 4 event (i.e. a high energy concert with
periods of high intensity music with crowd behaviour classed as excited, mostly standing and
bobbing with some jumping). The resulting solution is to provide a fabricated plate section to
stiffen the cantilever section and meet the 6Hz natural frequency criteria required. The dynamic
response will be further confirmed in the next stages.

Simple connections are generally adequate, with approximately 25% of frame connections
required to be full moment connections to achieve the dynamic criteria.

It is noted that the acceptance criteria for crowd induced dynamics should be discussed at an
early stage to ascertain whether a lower scenario can be accepted. The structural frame, for
example, is less likely to be governed by the scenario 2 event criteria (i.e. classical concerts
and typically well attended sporting events with the audience seated with only a few exceptions
resulting with minor excitation).

Figure 17-8: Indicative detail of terrace cantilever

17.2.3.1 Grids

The framing of the terrace bowl and accommodation structure will follow the orthogonal grids
set out by the architects. This orthogonal grid system results in a regular arrangement of the
frame, with the framing of the lower tiers repeated for the full bowl.

The framing of the roof and façade structures follow a radial grid system which has been
proposed to provide symmetry in the elevations and to provide the most efficient roof geometry.

The original design has separate supporting structures for the roof and façade, and the bowl
structure. To incorporate the supporting structures for bowl, roof and façade, it is proposed that
the primary beams of the terraces and primary beams of the floor structure may be vertically

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 213
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

supported at the perimeter by 24 primary columns, which are similar in position to the original
design.

17.2.4 Column layout

The outward sloping geometry of the stadium bowl dictates that the supporting columns of the
lower tiers are short, whilst the supporting columns of the upper tiers are tall and placed close
to the stadium perimeter. It has been assumed that terrace support columns may be placed
between the circulation cores, but not beyond.

The short columns are effectively restrained by each floor slab, whilst the upper tier columns
are tall and not restrained at all levels. The solution will be to restrain the columns laterally with
additional beam sections, however adding additional steel to the overall scheme. A detailed
review in the next stages will determine which of the columns would require the additional
restraint – dependant on column loading.

It is considered that the concourse floor arrangements will be further developed at the next
stage, and therefore column positions may be reviewed at the next stage to fit to the internal
room layouts (where possible) and to highlight any spaces which may require column-free areas
and therefore the addition of transfer structures.

Figure 17-9: Indicative column layout on the orthogonal grid – West stand plan with critical column positions
(marked in red) and suggested column positions (marked in blue).

17.2.5 Level 5 transfer truss

48 roof support columns are positioned around the stadium perimeter, whilst only 24 columns
have been assumed to continue to ground level via plinths. A transfer truss is therefore required

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 214
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

to support the intermediate columns and transfer the loads to the columns directly supported on
the plinths.

The lateral component of the inclined column force will be resisted by connections at Level 03
to the floor system.

Figure 17-10: Elevation of primary column layout with additional intermediate columns for roof support,
transfer truss below Level 05 and perimeter transfer beams at all other levels.

17.2.6 Cantilever beam solution

The alignment and position of the primary perimeter columns, to provide an aesthetic similar to
the original design, dictates that part of the Upper Concourse levels are constructed beyond the
line of the primary support and therefore cantilever beyond.

For the larger East and West stands, where floors exist at Levels 07 and 08, it may be possible
for the primary floor beams to cantilever to support the floors, subject to a detailed review of the
floor dynamics.

For Level 06 of the East and West stands, and Level 05 generally, it will be necessary to provide
additional support to the cantilevering slab. This may be provided by a secondary truss on the
primary floor beam lines, or by introducing column hangers on the 7.5 degree grids to connect
at high level.

If the perimeter floor areas could be reduced, with a view to having say a 2m cantilever beyond
the cantilever at each floor level, this would provide a simplification to the structure and provide
a saving, but note that further design work is required by the architect in the future stages to
review the floor areas.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 215
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-11: Typical column layout – West stand section with critical column positions (marked in red) and
suggested column positions (marked in blue).

17.2.7 Terraces, vomitories and barriers

Precast terrace units, vomitory walls, balcony units and associated side panels and step blocks
are to be designed and detailed by the precast concrete sub-contractor. Below are typical details
which are applicable to the design.

17.2.7.1 Terraces

The grandstand terraces are to be formed from precast concrete terrace units spanning
between structural steel raker beams. The precast terraces units are supported on a steel stool
welded to the raking steel beam, and connected by locating a dowel within a pre-drilled pocket
in the terrace unit, and grouted with non-shrink grout.

The terrace units transfer vertical and horizontal loads to the steel raker beams. The precast
units are not assumed to provide restraint to the raker beams nor do they act as a diaphragm
or as ties.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 216
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Partition walls below


terrace to be separated
with a vertical
movement joint.

Figure 17-12: Typical precast terrace unit connection at raker beams

17.2.7.2 Vomitories

Lower level vomitory walls will be formed from precast concrete and sit directly on to the ground
beams with resin anchors post drilled into the ground beams corresponding with dowel holes in
the vomitory units. The anchors are to be grouted with non-shrink grout immediately after
installation of the vomitory walls.

Upper level vomitory walls will be formed from precast concrete and sit directly on to supporting
beams at floor level with steel dowels pre-welded to the supporting beam and corresponding to
dowel holes in the precast vomitory. The anchors are to be grouted with non-shrink grout
immediately after installation of the vomitory walls.

Figure 17-13: Typical vomitory wall connection to ground beams

Precast terrace units adjacent vomitory walls are supported on steel angle sections fixed to the
side of the vomitory walls.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 217
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-14: Vomitory wall support detail for terrace units

At the front of the cantilever terrace section a ‘U’ shaped precast unit forms the front of the
balcony including the front barrier.

Figure 17-15: Precast balcony units of cantilever.

Figure 17-16: Precast balcony unit at front of cantilever

The rear rows of lower sections of precast terrace units may provide support to the metal deck
floor slab behind. Steel angles may be fixed to the rear of the precast units to provide support
to the metal decking.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 218
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-17: Precast terrace unit support to metal deck slabs (or alternatively reinforced concrete slabs),
where necessary onto the rear of precast terrace units.

17.3 Façade Structure

17.3.1 Consideration of the original design

The existing design is one of the most complex and costly arrangements to fabricate.

The Vessel structure is formed of a double layer diagrid Vierendeel that is set out to a curved
geometry in two directions. The double layer diagrid is then stiffened by diagonal "ribs” that
follow the same spacing and reflect the alignment of the roof support columns behind. Lattice
truss steel floor structures extend out to the external vessel in a number of locations.

The vessel geometry creates a very large space between the back of the stands and the
external façade. This was considered to be an expensive arrangement that could be value
engineered without compromising the functionality of the stadium.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 219
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-18: Extract from original design drawing showing the Cladding support arrangement

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 220
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-19: Enlarged view of cladding support arrangement

The "rib is a fin-like structure 2.5m deep and 0.6m wide, fabricated from a number of plates cut
and curved and then welded together to form a section with a very high architectural content.

There are two methods typically used to form this shape as indicated below.

Figure 17-20: Sketch options for fabrication of the Arup ‘rib’

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 221
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

We have created such sections in the past and they have always proved to be very costly to
form, requiring many more fabrication hours to create a smooth section. Our proposal is to avoid
this approach and provide an open tubular steel arrangement instead, please see VE option
section shown in figure 17.24 below.

The dual layer diagrid structure creates very complex connections with between 6 and 9
intersecting members at a node. This can be avoided with a revised structural arrangement.

Figure 17-21: Extract from Arup Drawings showing Vessel Ribs

17.3.2 Fabrication & Transportation:

We anticipate that the structure will largely be fabricated off-site and transported large sections.
If the fabrication shop is in Qatar we would expect sections up to 25m long and 5m wide to be
transported by road. Subject to the Qatar highways limitations.

If the steel work is fabricated overseas, we find that the maximum length transported is reduced
to only 16-18m in length such that the pieces will fit into a standard shipping container.

Due to the rib lengths, we expect that there will be 3 site splices (1 at each end and 1 in the
middle). If there is sufficient layout space and programme time it is advantageous to site weld
the fin sections together.

This will reduce the fabrication shop hours (cutting and welding) as well as reducing the amount
of steelwork in the project.

Hidden bolted connections are shown on the original design drawings.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 222
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-22: Extract from Arup drawings showing the two typical splice details

These joints are indicated as flange plate connections with many plates and a high fabrication
content.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 223
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-23: Extract from Arup drawings showing enlarged splice detail between two sections of ‘rib’

We have found in the past that these are not the most structurally efficient. Our intention would
be to reduce the complexity of these connections using fishplate connections instead.

Figure 17-24: Fishplate connection option for ‘rib’ splice

For the typical CHS to CHS splice connection, a simplified exposed flange plate detail can be
adopted.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 224
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-25: Proposed CHS to CHS splice joint alternative

17.3.3 Potential savings to the original design Vessel arrangement

We have highlighted above that the Arup/Foster scheme is complex with a high percentage of
hidden steel connections which are costly to form. Given that the stadium is to have a short life,
we question the justification of this expense.

In London for the 2012 Olympic Games the short life buildings were designed to a reduced
specification for the minimum requirements, with the simplest and efficient connection details
and a reduced corrosion protection system.

Potential savings for the vessel are;

I. Greatly simplify the connections to the CHS sections with exposed "pipe- flange"
connections.

II. Simplify and expose the "rib" splice connections

III. Site weld as many connections as possible, but as a minimum the highly loaded
connections. Temporary bolted connections can be used to assist erection alignment,
prior to welding.

IV. Revise the bespoke "rib" sections to be either

a. A fabricated box with flat plates or

b. An open truss fabricated from tubes.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 225
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

17.3.4 Consideration of the potential savings for a reduction in facade dimensions

In this option we have based our statements on the assumption that the new arrangement is to
look exactly like the original design, and is therefore a "scaled-down" version of the original
design.

Figure 17-26: Sketch showing varying vessel radius profiles

17.3.4.1 VE Opportunity 1

As noted in the façade report, reducing the external diameter of the Vessel has reduced the
area of the facade by 9666 m2 that is an approximate 20% reduction in area.
This has given a number of benefits;
i. Reducing the length of each of the members in elevation and therefore proportionally
reducing the steel tonnage
ii. Reduced weight of cladding to be supported.
iii. Reduced structural spans, leading to lower bending moments and axial loads.

Scaling down the existing scheme does have a number of disadvantages;

The complexity in the geometry is exactly the same, with the same curvature and angle of
inclination.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 226
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

There are the same number of members to be cut, welded and connected as the original design.

The Structural Analysis of the scaled down original design has not been undertaken since it
would retain much of the complexity which adds coat and therefore may not have a significant
cost saving much above the 20% reduction in area.

17.3.4.2 VE Opportunity 2

In reducing the vessel area has brought the external façade closer to the floor structures, this
gives the opportunity for an alternative secondary support structure, as discussed below.

The primary advantages are;

Omission of one complete layer of the diagrid Vierendeel structure

Omission of the expensive fabricated ‘Rib’ section and associated splices

Omission of the spaceframe style floor support structures

The consequence of the above savings is that we have a strut and tie arrangement to transfer
the external tertiary diagrid forces to the nearest floor and columns.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 227
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

17.3.4.3 VE Opportunity 3

In the process of reducing the roof and the façade dimensions, it has been possible to move the
main support columns inwards towards the pitch. This has enabled the roof support columns to
be combined with the floor structure, as indicated below.

Figure 17-27: Showing inclined perimeter columns

We are proposing there be two column types, the Main Columns set out every 15° around the
bowl (7.5° off of the orthogonal N/S/E/W gridlines) with intermediate columns equally spaced
between them.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 228
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-28: 3D View of Radial Columns supporting roof and façade

The intermediate columns will be supported on a 2D truss situated beneath Level 05. This truss
will carry not only the façade load through the column, but also the roof loading and Level 05
floor slab load. These columns will be inclined in section, but straight in elevation.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 229
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-29: Showing Inclined perimeter columns and Level 05 truss

In order to reduce the complexity, we have considered a single layer diagrid system to support
the external façade cladding. We envisage this will be constructed from standard sized rolled
steel hollow sections.

The diagrid will be supported by a series of inclined columns which also support the roof.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 230
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-30: Façade framing

The external diagrid is connected to the main columns on each of the 7.5° roof columns. Vertical
load is transferred to these by a series of V-struts. The location of these forms a truss like
arrangement that spreads the wind load into the stand structures where they are available. This
arrangement can accommodate the ever changing heights, spans and floor arrangements
around the bowl whilst maintaining efficiency.

During the next stage of the design it should be possible to achieve further savings to the façade
by optimizing the geometry of external vessel with the intention of creating additional repetition
and standardisation to the panels and supporting structure.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 231
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-31: Section through façade support structure

The section above indicates the relative positioning of the vessel geometry, the stands, floor
plates and roof structure.

The revised structural arrangement has reduced the diagrid structure by one complete layer
without having to increase the remaining diagrid member sizes (508 diameters throughout).

The V-Strut transfer elements are also 500mm deep in the current model.

The main columns have been reduced from fabricated tubes up to 2000mm in diameter to
813mm CHS.

These are all advantages, the only disadvantage with this current arrangement is that the
intermediate roof column has to be supported by a long span truss between primary columns.
A further cost saving option would be to take the intermediate columns directly down to ground,
removing the need for a truss at Level 05.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 232
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Figure 17-32: External Elevation

Figure 17-33: Quarter Stadium secondary structure model

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 233
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A preliminary comparative study of the relative approximate steelwork weights for the Tender
Design and the VE proposals has been undertaken in order to assess the likely comparative
savings that might be generated by the VE proposals.

Tender Proposal VE Proposal Indicative %


reduction

Façade Structure 5,237 3,508 -33%

Wind Girders 1,099* 1,396 +27%

Primary Structure 7,873 2,738 -65%

14,209 Tonnes 7,642 Tonnes -47%

Although due to the differences in the basic form of the façade it is difficult to make a direct
comparison between elements of the structure it can be seen that a significant saving is
achieved in the Primary Structure, (i.e. the inclined V column), while a lesser saving is achieved
in the Façade Structure itself, which is probably more representative of the reduction in façade
area. The increase in weight of the elements describe as Wind Girders appears to be as a
result in the change of structural form of the façade supporting structure and as a tonnage
represents a relatively minor increase over the original design.

The result is an indicative saving in the region of 50% on the steel weight of the Tender Proposal
in addition to any efficiencies created in what could be in some areas a simpler design.

17.4 Roof Structure and Steelwork VE Summary:


 The Roof VE option offers cost savings over that than which results in the proportional
reduction in roof area and further optimisation in the next stage may yield additional
savings
 The steel terrace structure is a viable option which will allow easier removal for the
legacy mode.
 The steel stand structure may not offer significant cost savings over the concrete frame,
however where large clear spans are required, such as adjacent to the façade, the steel
option does provide a number on benefits.
 In addition to the reduction in area of the vessel surface, the Arup/Foster façade
supporting structure can be considerably simplified whilst maintaining the same (or very
similar) external appearance and as a result significant cost savings can potentially be
achieved.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 234
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18 VE of Crowd Modeling - Crowd Dynamics

18.1 Introduction

This section is an appraisal of the VE options from a crowd movement perspective. The aims
of the analysis undertaken were as follows:
 Prove that the architectural VE changes are suitable for crowd movement for both
internal and external areas of the stadium
 Improve the design to increase amenity of spectators travelling to/from the stadium
 Mitigate the identified shortcomings in the existing design
 Use case studies from FIFA compliant stadia to aid the design process
 Consider requirements for legacy use

Crowd Dynamics International have worked alongside the project team to analyse the VE
options and help to shape the design in a way that optimises spectator’s movement while
maintaining the core value engineering principles proposed.

The main change affecting crowd movement is that the stadium footprint has been reduced,
and raised out of the groundwater. The impact of this is shown at concourse level below:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 235
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

This allowed for large reduction in costs, but in turn, meant that there are a number of areas
related to crowd movement that needed to be addressed:
 Raising the stadium has meant more vertical circulation is required to move spectators
from precinct level to main concourse level
 Shrinking the stadium footprint means that more space is available, providing the
opportunity to optimise external crowd movement
 Internal spaces must remain compliant with the relevant codes, regarding evacuation,
internal circulation both horizontal and vertical

18.1.1 Methodology

Crowd movement has been assessed on the basis of the Stage 1 report assumptions, criteria
for design and design guidance. The revised VE options have been analysed as far as possible
using static and dynamic analysis as appropriate.

The external areas of the stadium have been designed to green guide standards, allowing
appropriate space for spectator’s movement, and optimising the placement of vertical
circulation. They have been analysed using static analysis to determine requisite design widths
for crowd flow, and have been tested using a newly constructed dynamic simulation model to
highlight the gained operational efficiency in comparison to the Foster’s design.

The internal areas have been designed to maintain the GFA of internal concourse space and
the same vertical circulation cores as the fosters design. The current VE proposal has not
specified stair widths and specific vomitory widths and so the analysis has shown that the design
is flexible enough to accommodate the 80,000 capacity.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 236
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.2 Internal Circulation

The distribution of gross spectator seating is shown below:

The net capacity of the stadium will be 80,000 spectators, excluding VIP/VVIP guest. VIP/VVIP
have segregated routes from the other spectators, which require only 2-3m of circulation width
in total, which will be provided and hence are discounted from further calculation.

The main vertical circulation for GA/hospitality spectators is via stair cores, provided in the same
number as the original Foster’s design. The stairs have not been sized due to the changing
nature of the VE exercise, but the footprints are flexible enough to accommodate the
requirements, with flexible internal circulation in the internal concourses.

The diagram below highlights the proposed VE design vertical circulation elements around the
stadium, highlighted in light blue around the perimeter of the stadium footprint.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 237
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The diagrams below show the distributed and flexible spectator movements through the various
stadium levels. They highlight the flexibility in design and options for spectator movement,
meaning that vertical circulation requirements can be accommodated within the proposal.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 238
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Level -1 Spectators Concourse

Level -2 Hospitality Spectators

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 239
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Level-3 Skyboxes Hospitality

Level-5 Upper Concourse Spectators

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 240
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Level-6 Upper Concourse Spectators

The design requires further development to fully specify adequate widths for each stair core,
although provision has been made to allow such stair width to be available under the FIFA 5th
Edition technical guidance. The same applies to concourse spaces and other provisions for
spectators within the VE design option.

Therefore, the provision and flexibility has been made in the design to allow for crowd movement
internally to the stadium. In future design, crowd modelling will be used to optimise the and fully
design the movement spaces.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 241
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3 External Crowd Movement

The original design has certain issues pertaining to crowd movement that were documented in
stage 1 of this VE exercise. The additional space afforded by reduction in stadium footprint has
meant some of these issues can be mitigated through the external design.

18.3.1 General Principles

The following general principles have been applied to the external design, considering the
requirements for crowd movement specified at stage 1:
 Maintain all previously proposed security and admission principles for Mag and Bag,
turnstiles and secure perimeter FIFA requirements.
 Utilise additional space provided by shrinking stadium footprint at concourse level
 Utilise additional space at precinct level if required
 Consider case studies of FIFA compliant stadia to further VE solutions for crowds
 Construct and analyse manageable options for crowds navigating new vertical height
difference of +5.0m between precinct and concourse level
 Use static and dynamic models as appropriate to test external concourse options

The following assumptions have been made to create a manageable space, which match or
exceed previous guidelines specified at stage 1. They have been chosen to enable efficient
crowd movement and will allow flexible crowd management options for normal and emergency
modes during ingress and egress.
 Approximate distribution of crowds across stadium stands assuming N/S/E/W stands
each split into two sections
 Fruin Level of service C on podium
 Fruin Level of service D on vertical circulation (VC)
 40% of GA spectators leave in 5 minutes
 72% of all spectators head east towards bus/car parking
 28% of all spectators head south towards metro/transport hub

18.3.2 Case Studies

The following case studies show FIFA compliant stadia with stairs, including Premier League
Stadia, National Stadia and venues from previous world cup tournaments.
The case studies demonstrate how changes in level external to the stadia have been designed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 242
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.1 Brasil 2014 – Estadia Nacional de Brasilia (72,788 capacity)

A combination of stairs and ramps is used to negotiate level changes up to the stadium external
concourse, as shown below.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 243
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.2 Brasil 2014 – Arena das Dunas (42,000 capacity)

Mainly stairs are used to negotiate to the pitch level concourse, with further stair external to the
stadium, allowing vertical circulation after turnstiles to a higher level.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 244
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.3 South Africa 2010 – Soccer City Stadium, Johannesburg (94,736 Capacity)

The main stadium for the 2010 world cup had a level change external to the stadium similar to
the proposed Lusail VE option, higher in some places. Multiple stairs around the stadium
allowed sufficient crowd circulation within FIFA’s parameters and when finished do not detract
from the external façade on approach.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 245
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.4 Friends Arena, Solna, Sweden, National Stadium (72,000 Capacity)

The Swedish National Stadium was designed and constructed with constraints similar to the
Lusail location, with two sides of the stadium inaccessible. A Solution using combined ramps
and stairs was found to enable access to the concourse entry level, as pictured below. The level
change was greater than the VE proposal for Lusail, but stairs and ramps were viable options.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 246
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.5 Emirates Stadium, London, UK, Arsenal FC (60,000 Capacity)

Home to Arsenal FC, the ground is accessed by wide stairs to one side and ramps to the other.
The use of head of stair barriers made from concrete, are in keeping with the surrounds, not
requiring the standard metal barriers. Such a technique could be applied with different materials
at lusail, if stairs are a viable option.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 247
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.2.6 Summary of Case Studies

The above case studies have served to show that level changes can be approached in a number
of different ways. The proposed VE option that lifts the stadium saves value, but similar
approaches to the above must be taken. It is worth noting that none of the above have solely
ramp options for such heights, where space is not available to create such ramps. Furthermore,
whilst ramps can provide access to wheelchairs, longer ramps are not ideal for the mobility
impaired and therefore, elevator access is still a requirement. Stairs often provide the shortest
route and allow a more dispersed ingress and egress for crowds, where ramps take a lot more
space and lengthen the journey.

18.3.3 External VE Options

Many iterations of options have been designed to satisfy the requirements for crowd movement,
with consideration to FIFA guidelines and SC guidelines, whilst providing the best value option
that allows some of the previous problems to be reduced or solved entirely. There are two main
options as follows:
 Option 1: Ramps and stairs
 Option 2: 1:50 precinct slope with shorter ramps to concourse level at 1:50

Option 2 is split into option 2a with 5 ramps to the south and east, and option 2b with 6 ramps
around the concourse level.

All options are shown in the figures below:

Option 1 – 2 ramps, N stairs (assumed here to be 8)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 248
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Option 2a – 5 ramps, 3 entrance points at concourse level

Option 2b – 6 ramps distributed entrance/exits for ingress/egress

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 249
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The following sections highlight the analysis undertaken and the advantages and disadvantages
of the components of each option and the designs as a whole.

18.3.4 Design of Vertical Circulation Elements

As highlighted in the stage 1 analysis, ramps approached with large U-turn movements are not
optimal, being used at uneven densities and are potentially unsafe unless sufficient turning
space is allowed for. Stairs positioned in the direction of flow or perpendicular to the concourse
mitigate this issue, but require design as per the Green Guide/FIFA 5th editions.

18.3.4.1 Ramp design

Where U-turn movements are likely to enter a ramp, the following design has been proposed,
assuming a 20m width. The circular approach to the top of the ramp allows more space for
crowds to turn more gradually onto the ramp, improving efficiency.

Ramps have been designed at a 1:21 slope to meet accessibility criteria, with consistent entry
and exit widths.

This option was tested using dynamic simulation to highlight the acceptable crowd movement.
It has been assumed that crowds are managed to use the spaces as evenly as possible. This
could take the form of stewarding, barriers, signage etc.

The diagram below shows the use of space in the model, especially highlighting that a split at
the bottom of the ramp for those spectators heading south and those heading east would be
acceptable at a level of service D

Spatial Utilisation in U-turn ramp design

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 250
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The mean density plot below highlights the generally evenly used space, showing the design
would work effectively with crowd management in place. It is noted that due to reliance on crowd
management to evenly distribute crowds, this is not ideal, and movements should approach at
least from both sides of a ramp or limiting turning movements to 90degrees where possible.

Cumulative Mean Density Plot for U-turn movements on proposed ramp design

18.3.4.2 Stair design

The stairs are to be designed to meet FIFA guidelines, with reference to the Green Guide. The
following designs are proposed for 9m wide and 12m wide stairs up a level difference +4.95m,
where any minor difference in level should be accommodated with a gentle ramp of slope less
than 1:40, rather than a smaller or larger step. Central handrails are required and head of stairs
barriers to deflect forward pressure on the stairs have been dimensioned as per guidance. As
noted form the case studies, these can be made in any material that can withstand the relevant
force, and can therefore become part of the landscape design.

Stair and head barrier design for 9m and 12m

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 251
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Stair section dimensions

18.3.5 Option 1 Analysis

The option combines both ramps and stairs, as seen in many of the case studies. This is seen
as the best value option from a construction perspective and also the most distributed crowd
movement. It allows allows full flexibility for further design stages in terms of crowd movement
as the stair positions can be moved, resized easily and even extended to different heights.
Because there are only 2 ramps, they can also be repositioned as required through more
detailed design stages. This is the preferred option from a crowd movement perspective, but
uses external stairs that do not exist in the original design.

Dynamic modelling was undertaken on this preferred option to show how the stairs work and
how ramps without the above design function with no U-Turn movement.

It has been assumed that the exit from the stadium is evenly distributed between the 24 possible
exit points. A relatively even distribution is likely in any final design given the symmetrical nature
of the VE internal layout, even if each stair core does not take precisely the same number of
people. All previously stated assumptions apply. The simulation was run for a period of 20
minutes, with the peak 10 minute flow exiting the stadium (80% of GA spectators in 10 mins) to
represent the peak period for crowd flow.

The diagram below shows snapshots from the model through the run, with a cumulative mean
density map, highlighting the acceptable density within the design, and acceptable use of
ramps.

All spectators in the simulation are coloured according to their exit point, which is either the
bottom of the different stairs, or the bottom of the two ramps.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 252
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Whole model snapshot at 2 minutes after egress starts

Whole model snapshot at 7 minutes after egress starts

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 253
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Whole model snapshot at 10 minutes after egress starts

Whole model snapshot at 12 minutes after egress starts

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 254
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Southern ramp crowds at peak model densities

Northern ramp crowds at peak model densities

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 255
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Stair and concourse movements at peak model densities

Cumulative mean density over the whole simulation

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 256
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Cumulative maximum density over whole simulation

The snapshots show a consistency in crowding through the model, with the cumulative mean
density showing many less issues than the original design. The requirements for crowd
management are less than the original, and are softer measures such as signage and
wayfinding and verbal instructions on direction.

The cumulative maximum density over the whole simulation shows that the maximum density
each space experienced is within acceptable and expected boundaries.

Overall, the design and individual VC elements have been shown to function well in Option 1
through dynamic simulation.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 257
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.6 Option 2

Both option 2a and 2b are assessed using static assessment, given that the dynamic simulation
has shown the proposed element design to function acceptably, providing acceptable crowd
management is in place for ramps.

Both options contain only ramps, which is not considered ideal. Option 2b is an optimisation of
2a from a crowd movement perspective.

18.3.6.1 2a

The diagram below shows option 2a, highlighting the ramps and locations where external widths
were calculated using static formula based on level of service. To reduce cross movements in
this option, it was assumed that all spectators must circulate at concourse level to separate
those heading south and those heading east so that a reduction in cross flow is obtained at
precinct level.

Locations where widths were calculated in static assessment of option 2a

The table below shows the relevant widths for each area, at a level of service C for concourse
level and level of service D for the ramps. This allows sufficient space for the necessary
circulation at concourse level.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 258
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

TOTAL NUMBER IN 5 ABSOLUTE


MINS MINIMUM
WIDTH
REQUIRED
A 3405 14m
B 1362 6m
C 7004 29m
D 2918 12m
E 3308 14m
F 6469 26m
U 5107 15m
V 2724 19m
W 9631 20m
X 3502 16m
Y 7004 16m
Table of minimum widths required in Option 2a

The minimum widths are provided in the design. It is noted that in any design optimisation, areas
C and F should be considered in more detail to provide additional space near to the ramp areas.
All ramps should be designed to the specification above because they do have large u-turn
movements.

The design meets the specified parameters, but will require active crowd management to
distribute crowds to the correct ramps, and careful monitoring of the external areas to prevent
and mitigate build-up of crowd densities.

Emergency provision to the North West would still be required as per the original proposals.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 259
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

18.3.6.2 2b

The diagram below shows option 2b, highlighting the ramps and locations where external widths
were calculated using static formula based on level of service. The distribution of crowds exiting
the concourse is of benefit to crowd management and natural crowd movement, meaning softer
crowd management would be required in this option than option 2a. The number of u-turn
movements is also reduced. Cross flow at precinct level is reduced from the original concept
and more distributed than option 2a assuming no management at concourse level.

Locations where widths were calculated in static assessment of option 2b

The table below shows the relevant widths for each area, at a level of service C for concourse
level and level of service D for the ramps. This allows sufficient space for the necessary
circulation at concourse level.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 260
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

TOTAL NUMBER IN 5 ABSOLUTE


MINS MINIMUM
WIDTH
REQUIRED
A 2432 10m
B 5740 23m
C 3405 14m
D 4183 17m
E 1702 7m
F 2772 11m
G 2432 10m
H 3648 15m
I 1216 5m
U 4426 13m
V 5545 17m
W 5253 16m
X 4864 15m
Y 3502 11m
Z 4378 13m
Table of minimum widths required in Option 2b

The ramp widths can be optimised, and it is recommended that they are kept consistent at the
maximum required. Consideration can also be given to removing the northern emergency
egress route, when widening the 6 ramps in this design.

Concourse widths are more than sufficient, allowing for landscaping options or further VE
reduction in future design by minimising widths, at a time when internal movement is better
developed.

18.4 Conclusions

The stadium has been assessed internally from a high level perspective to show that the design
has enough flexibility to cater for vertical circulation of spectators and required vomitory widths
for each GA, hospitality and VIP/VVIP spectators.

The external landscaping of the VE proposal has made use of the additional space and
mitigated the level change from precinct to concourse level within 3 options that have been
analysed. Stair and ramp designs have been proposed based on fifth edition guidance to be
used in the design. Option 1 with stairs and ramps, and options 2a and 2b with only ramps were
analysed dynamically and statically as appropriate to measure their applicability to guidelines.

Crowd management was considered at a high level through the modelling, analysis and design,
with emergency egress provision in-line with standards previously laid out in stage 1 and original
design documentation.

Further design iterations and crowd modelling would be required to match the internal exits with
sufficient vertical circulation externally and crowd management strategy being developed,
especially considering emergency provision.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 261
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19 Consideration of Legacy Approach related to VE Decisions

We have reviewed the Legacy mode requirements based on Document D2.5 in the RFP, our
feedback on the various disciplines are the following:

19.1 Architecture:

Based on Supreme committee requirements that “The memory of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
Qatar shall be retained”, therefore, the façade and roof structural shall be retained where
conversion for the Legacy Mode will be adopted internally.

All floors will be retained; partitions will be replaced with the new drywall partitions, meeting the
new design for the new multi-use community venue. The four facilities in this venue (Leasable
office area, Medical Clinic and Wellness Spa, residential accommodation, elementary school)
will occupy 6 floors (Plaza first level, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth levels.
Pitch level (level 0) will be converted to parking and MEP spaces. The new facilities will be
required certain number of parking spaces to comply with Municipality requirements, where the
MEP spaces shown in tournament mode will be used for Legacy mode. MEP part below will be
detailed covering all systems. The plant room and parking areas are excluded from the total
legacy areas (80,000m2).

The parking will be accessed thru the existing ramp per the tournament mode design. Additional
ramp might be required after TIS model is carried out for the legacy mode.
Please refer to floor plans below depicting the required zoning for each facility in each floor.
The cores 9stairs and elevator) in Tournament mode will be used in Legacy mode. Additional
stairs and elevators might be required to serve the new facility and comply with the Life safety
code and QCD. The Void between the vessel and internal floor slabs will be used as atrium
space, ventilated, where the various facilities can overlook this space. Internal garden can be
created indoors.

The tiers will be removed except for the lower tier that will be retained to access the pitch level.
External walls will be added to enclose the new spaces for the various facilities.

The pitch will remain open to sky, will be converted to surface parking, landscape and open
playground and park that will be used for the residential and school. The pitch level (converted
to surface parking and playground) will be access for car thru the parking floor. Fire truck shall
have access to the pitch area.

19.2 Structural:

For the tournament mode there are 8 levels of floor structure with 3 levels of tiers for the seating.
For the proposed legacy mode only up to level 6 will be retained. Therefore, it is proposed to
have the conventional cast in place Reinforced Concrete (RC) structure up to level 6 and steel
structure with either precast hollow core slab or steel decking composite slab will be adopted.

With the proposal of steel structure above level 7 it will be easily demountable during the legacy
stage. The fixing of the proposed steel columns above the RC columns will be by bolts. All the
steel to steel connections will also be by bolts so that it can be easily demountable and reusable
in the future.

The raking beam for supporting the precast seating structure in the tiers will also be proposed
as steel structure so that it can be removed in the future easily. Similarly, all the tier structures
are kept as precast structures which is also demountable.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 262
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The loadings such as the super imposed dead loads including the allowance of partition loads
and live loads will be allowed correctly keeping in consideration of the legacy use so that the
base structure can be retained after the tournament mode.

The roof structure is also proposed to retain during the legacy mode. Only concern for the roof
is to make sure the PVC roofing material proposed has to be maintained or replaced after its
life period which will be smaller compare to the normal design life period of 50 years.

a- HVAC:

b- Fire protection

c- Plumbing

d- Electrical:

e- Security

f- AV and Telecom

g- Infrastructure (access roads and utilities)

h- Landscape

i- GSAS and Sustainability

j- Kitchen and F&B

19.3 Plumbing System

19.3.1 Potable Cold Water System - Retain and Reuse with additional water meters

The existing tournament mode potable cold water system supplies water to wash basins,
ablution taps, sinks, showers, dishwashers, etc. in the building.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School with some required modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the
legacy mode plan layout requirement.

The new apartment and office buildings in the legacy mode will be requiring additonal water
meters in the potable water distribution lines feeding every unit of the apartment and offices as
illustrated below for water metering purposes.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 263
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.3.2 Non-Potable Cold Water System - Retain and Reuse with additional water meters

The existing tournament mode non-potable cold water system supplies water to water closets,
urinals, bib taps, etc. in the building.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School with some required modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the
legacy mode plan layout requirement.

The new apartment and office buildings in the legacy mode will be requiring additonal water
meters in the non-potable water distribution lines feeding every unit of the apartment and offices
as illustrated below for water metering purposes.

19.3.3 TSE Water Supply System – Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode TSE water supply system is used for WC and urinal flushing,
pitch irrigation, suitable wash down facilities (e.g. bib taps) and supply of irrigation water to
external landscaping (part of Infra scope of work).

It can be retained and reused if required for non-potable use and external landscaping in the
legacy mode.

19.3.4 Hot water System – Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode hot water system consists of local point - of - use direct electric
generation or local hot water storage calorifiers with associated local secondary return
circulation systems.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve Clinics and School with some required
modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.

In the apartment and offices buildings, dedicated or localized water heaters will be added in the
installations as indicatively shown below.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 264
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.3.5 Chilled Cold Water System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode chilled cold water system supplies water to selected end users
within the stadium. The provision of chilled water shall be through local generation of chilled
water via plate heat exchanger (PHX), chilled water storage vessel (semi-storage type) and
secondary return circulation pumping system.

It can be retained and reused only to serve the clinic building where chilled cold water system
is required per code. Some line distributions will be modified to suite the legacy mode plan
layout requirement for the clinic building.

19.3.6 Water Storage System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode water storage system consists of bulk potable & non-potable
water tanks and pitch irrigation water tank which are generally of concrete construction (See
illustration below). The exception to this being for the dedicated potable & non-potable tanks
serving the Emir suite, condensate collection tanks and roof cleaning tanks which are made of
sectional pre-insulated GRP panel construction.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 265
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

These storage tanks can be retained and reused for legacy mode complex to serve the
individual building offices, clinics, apartments and school with estimated potable and non-
potable demand as tabulated below.

ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND IN LEGACY MODE

Sewer
Number of Potable Water (Human/Primate
Item SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Waste)
Occupants Demand(L/P)
No. Area (m2)
per IBC
Daily Daily
Peak(LPM) Peak(LPM)
Flow(LPD) Flow(LPD)

1 WEST STAND, OFFICES 22,665 2,437 60 146,220 116,976

2 SOUTH STAND, CLINICS 17,248 862 250 215,500 172,400


EAST STAND,
3 APARTMENTS 18,920 946 210 198,660 158,928

4 NORTH STAND, SCHOOL 21,691 1,446 75 108,450 86,760

668,830 535,064

Total Domestic Water &


Sewage Demand 80,524 669 m3 535

Two(2) Days Storage per m3


Kharamaa Requirement 1,338

m3
POTABLE WATER(60%) 800

m3
NON-POTABLE WATER(40%) 538

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 266
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Potable and Non-Potable Water Storage Tanks

In case of different owners/renters for the legacy mode Office, School, Apartment and Clinics,
each building will be having a dedicated/separated water storage tank and booster pump sets
to supply water to the building.

19.3.7 Domestic Water Booster Pump System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode booster pump system consists of packaged multi-stage pump
type units, each to include multi-stage inverter controlled quiet running variable speed pumps
(minimum duty, support & standby), inlet & outlet manifold headers, integral control panel &
isolator, accumulator vessel(s) & associated isolation valves, outlet pressure controls, low level
cut-out switches, flexible connections/anti-vibration mounts all mounted on a common skid base
frame.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School.

In case of different owners/renters for the legacy mode Office, School, Apartment and Clinics,
each building will be having a dedicated/separated booster pump sets to supply water to the
building.

19.3.8 Pitch Irrigation System – Retain and Reuse for Future Landscaping

The existing tournament mode pitch irrigation water system is used for pitch irrigation water
system, supply of water to hose bibs for cleaning purposes and external landscaping

It can be retained and reused for future landscaping.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 267
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.3.9 Combined Building Drainage System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode for building drainage system can be retained and reused for
legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School with some
required modifications in the drainage layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement
as described below.
 Core main drainage risers 3 to 9 to receive discharges from the Apartment building.
 Core main drainage risers 10 to 13 to receive discharges from the Clinic building.
 Core main drainage risers 14 to 22 to receive discharges from the Offices building.
 Core main drainage risers 23 & 24 and 1 & 2 to receive discharges from the School
building.

19.3.10 Grey Water System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode grey water system can be retained and reused for legacy mode
for the supply of water to water closets, urinals, etc.in Offices, Apartments and School buildings
with some required modifications in the layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.

Clinics will be fed by potable water system from the existing potable water storage tank via
existing booster pumping units.

19.3.11 Condensate Recycling - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode condensate recycling system consists 10 sets of satellite
condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets, water treatment system and
pipe works. This recycled water is used for pitch irrigation and flushing of WCs and urinals.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode for the supply of water to water closets, urinals,
etc. in Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School buildings with some required modifications in the
layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.

19.3.12 Rain Water Drainage System - Retain

The existing tournament mode rain water drainage/collection system can be retained.

19.3.13 Roof Cleaning System - Retain

The existing tournament mode roof cleaning system consists of local break tanks and
associated pump sets which serve numbers of hose reel points within each quadrant at roof
level. These are supplied from the non-potable water system.

It can be retained and reused for legacy mode for the supply of water for non-potable use.

19.3.14 Leak Detection System - Retain

The existing tournament mode for the leak detection system will be retained and reused with
some modifications to be made in the layout to suite the legacy layout plan.

19.3.15 Metering and sub-metering system – Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode for the metering and sub-metering system will be retained with
some modifications to be made in distributions/locations to suite the legacy layout plan.

Apartment and office buildings will be requiring additional meters for the water supply line of
each apartment unit.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 268
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.3.16 Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System - Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode for the sanitary area shut off valve system will be retained with
some modifications to be made in distribution to suite the legacy layout plan.

19.3.17 Internal Pipework – Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode for internal pipework installations will be retained with some
modifications in the distribution to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.

19.3.18 Building Management System(BMS) – Retain and Reuse

The existing tournament mode for building management system will be retained with some
modifications in the system to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.

19.4 Fire Protection

19.4.1 Fire Suppression

The legacy mode buildings (school, offices, clinics and apartments) are classified according to
NFPA Code 101, 13 and 14, as light hazard.
 Sprinkler head coverage area: 12m2
 Sprinkler max. area of operation: 232m2
 Sprinkler sys. design density:
 Light Hazard: 0.1 U.S gpm/sq ft. (4.1 L/min/m2)
 Sprinkler sys. duration of operation is 60 minutes.
 Minimum residual pressure at the most remote sprinkler: 15 Psi (1 bar)
 Sprinkler system maximum area covered per control station: 4800m2 per floor.
 Residual pressure for landing valves and fire hydrants is 7bars ≤ P ≤ 12 bars
 Hydraulically designed Standpipes and Automatic sprinkler systems shall be designed
to provide the required minimum water flow and residual pressure at the most remote
area.

HAZARD CLASSIFICATION
School Light Hazard Occupancy
Offices Light Hazard Occupancy
Clinics Light Hazard Occupancy
Apartments Light Hazard Occupancy

Minimum fire water reserved for fire suppression systems:


 Sprinklers: 500 U.S gpm
 Wet risers (2 risers): 500U.S. gpm (maximum)
 External fire hydrant: Three fire hydrants each of 250 gpm

All fire suppression systems described below are subject to the approval by Civil Defense
Department or authorities having jurisdiction.

19.4.2 Fire pumps


Legacy mode:
 The complex (school, offices, clinics and apartments) will be equipped with two sets of
fire pumps at located at ground level, (each comprise of one electrical, and one diesel
fire pump according to NFPA 20 standards, operating as duty and stand-by), to feed all

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 269
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

the fire suppression systems, such as external fire hydrants, sprinkler and fire hose reel
/ wet riser.
 Fire pump set will contain jockey pump to maintain the pressure in the fire systems at
all times.
 Quadruple fire brigade breeching inlets shall be provided at the boundary walls of the
complex to allow the fire department fire truck to supplement the fire protection water
reserve supply.
 Pressure reducing stations shall be introduced where the pressure exceeds the
allowable limits.
 Alarm check valve with water gongs will be provided for each building (school, offices,
clinics and apartments)

VE mode:

In the VE design, it is recommended to be combined the sprinklers, standpipe, (class 3) and


external fire hydrants with one set of fire pumps. The capacity of fire pumps should be as per
hydraulic calculations and can be 1250gpm per NFPA-13 &14.
Conclusion:

The fire pumps for VE mode will be used for the legacy mode since the height of the building
do not change. But new alarm checks valves and water gongs will be required for each building.

If the four buildings are owned by different clients then 4 sets of fire pumps will be required, one
for each building (school, offices, clinics and apartments).

19.4.3 Fire water tanks


Legacy mode:

One-hour raw water demand for fire systems at ground level is required per NFPA and QCD
requirements.
VE mode:

In the VE design, it is recommended to design the storage fire water tank for 1 hour instead of
2 hours.
Conclusion:
 The fire water tanks for VE mode can be for used the legacy mode complex since the
height of the buildings do not change.
 If the four buildings (school, offices, clinics and apartments) are owned by different
clients then fire water tank will be required, one for each building.

19.4.4 Automatic sprinkler system


Legacy mode:
 The offices, school, clinics and apartments will be fully sprinkled according to NFPA-13
and QCD requirements.
 The sprinkler system will be fed from a separate wet riser system.
 Floor control assemblies and alarm check valves will be provided to control the offices,
school, clinics and apartments architectural fire zones.
 Quick response sprinklers will be provided to isolate the fire zones.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 270
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

VE mode:

Sprinklers have been provided in the VE mode for fire protection.


Conclusion:
 The sprinklers with fire pipes and fittings can be reused with modification, alteration and
addition as required for each building.
 Floor control assemblies and alarm check valves can be reused with modification,
alteration and addition as required for each building.

19.4.5 Wet riser system


Legacy mode:

Separate, wet risers installed in the stairwells will be required to serve the new sprinkler system
and 65mm landing valves for each building.
VE mode:

Wet risers have been designed for VE mode since the staircases are the same.
Conclusion:

The wet risers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for each
building.

19.4.6 Hose reel system and fire extinguishers


Legacy mode:

Indoor fire hose-reel stations shall be installed in the offices, school, clinics and apartments in
compliance with NFPA 14 code and QCD requirements. Each indoor fire hose reel station
should be equipped with:
 Red lacquered steel cabinet.
 25 mm, 30 mm long hose – reel
 6kg portable fire extinguisher- rating Class- C
 9 litter pressure water fire extinguisher- rating class- A

VE mode:

Hose reel system and fire extinguishers have been provided in the VE mode.
Conclusion:

Hose reel system and fire extinguishers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition
as required for each building.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 271
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.4.7 Portable fire extinguishers


Legacy mode:

Portable fire extinguishers will be provided for each building the complex.

LOCATION PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

Electrical Rooms Dry powder fire extinguisher rating


Class- C- Environmentally friendly
powder.

Telecom Rooms Dry powder fire extinguisher rating


Class- C- Environmentally friendly
powder.

Mechanical Rooms Dry Chemical

Kitchens Multi-Purpose Dry Chemical, liquid


agent fire extinguisher rating Class- K

VE mode:

Portable fire extinguishers have been provided in VE mode design.


Conclusion:

Fire extinguishers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for each
building.

19.4.8 Clean agent systems


Legacy mode:

Clean agent systems shall be provided to protect the communication, UPS, ELV and computer
server rooms located in all buildings (offices, school, clinics and apartments).
VE mode:
Clean agent system has been in VE mode design.
Conclusion:

Clean agent system can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for
each building.

19.4.9 External fire hydrant system


Legacy mode:

No change in the external fire hydrants for legacy design.


VE mode:

External fire hydrants system has been designed in VE mode.


Conclusion:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 272
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

No change

19.5 HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance for Legacy mode

19.5.1 Basis of Validation in Legacy mode

In Legacy mode, the football stadium will be transformed into a multi-use community venue.
(school, clinics, office & apartment) The project in base build mode will have built-in features
that do not add cost to the project that facilitate conversion to Legacy Use.

The cooling load capacity are calculated approximately, based on the new architectural
information for the new legacy facilities which include the following:
 North stand – School - 14903.0 M2
 South stand – Clinics - 17188.0 M2
 West stand – Offices - 25819.0 M2
 East stand – Apartments - 25912.0 M2

Total Area – Facilities – 80822.0 M2

19.5.2 Cooling Strategies for Legacy mode

The cooling load calculation as indicated on the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 50.0 MV, based on the summer condition for legacy mode operation. The considered
outside air condition is dry bulb temperature = 36.8 Degree C and Wet bulb temperature = 33.4
Degree C.

Refer to SC document no Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-REP-0863 for future climate design data for


2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar.

For the new legacy mode, the cooling load (20.5MW) are calculated based on the summer
condition as detailed below:

19.5.3 Legacy Mode North Stand – School


Cooling Load for North Stand School

The cooling load for the school is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(14903.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 4.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy school, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section)
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode North Stand – School

The legacy mode north stand school will be provided with 20 Nos. Air handling units, 200 Nos
fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.

All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 273
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to north
stand school zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the north stand school zone.

Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.

The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.

19.5.4 Legacy Mode South Stand – Clinics


Cooling Load for South Stand Clinics.

The cooling load for the clinics is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(17188.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 4.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy clinics, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section).
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode South Stand – Clinics

The legacy mode south stand clinics will be provided with 20 Nos. Air handling units, 200 Nos
fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.

All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.

The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to south
stand clinics zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the south stand clinics zone.

Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.

The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.

19.5.5 Legacy Mode West Stand – Office


Cooling Load for West Stand Office

The cooling load for the office is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(25819.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 6.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy office, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section).
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode West Stand – office

The legacy mode west stand office will be provided with 30 Nos. Air handling units, 300 Nos fan
coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.

All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.

The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to west
stand office zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the west stand office zone.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 274
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.

The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.

19.5.6 Legacy Mode East Stand – Apartment


Cooling Load for East Stand Apartment

The cooling load for the apartment is calculated based on the summer condition and also new
areas (25912.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 6.0 MW approximately for the
new legacy apartment, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling
load calculation data sheet is attached in the below section)
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode East Stand – Apartment

The legacy mode east stand apartment will be provided with 30 Nos. Air handling units, 300
Nos fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.

All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.

The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to east
stand apartment zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the east stand apartment
zone.

Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.

The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.

19.5.7 Total Cooling capacity in Legacy mode.

Based on the new legacy mode, the cooling load capacity are calculated approximately 20.5
MW, which is 60 % percentage lower than the original design. (50.0 MW)

19.5.8 The following HVAC equipment are available from the tournament mode:
Plate heat exchangers

The available PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment from the tournament mode is sized for
60.0 MW cooling capacity. (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent of 4 Nos. duty + 1 No.
standby).

Chilled Water Pumps

The available chilled water pump from the tournament mode is sized for 60.0 MW cooling
capacity. (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby).

Air Handling Units

Total 300 Nos. of air handling unit are available from the tournament mode as follows:
 AHU's for Field of Play (FOP) = 10 Nos.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 275
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 AHU's for Tier -01 = 100 Nos.


 AHU's for Mid-Tier (VVIP & Sky Box) = 40 Nos.
 AHU's for Mid Perimeter = 50 Nos
 AHU's for front of house / back of house = 100 Nos.

Fan coil units

More than 1500 Nos. fan coil units are available from the tournament mode.

19.5.9 HVAC equipment requirements for the new legacy facilities

Based on the new legacy facilities the following HVAC equipment will be re-used from the
tournament mode:

The PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment will be sized 20.5 MW cooling capacity, based on
the new legacy facilities. To achieve the cooling capacity of 20.5 MW, by deleting the additional
plates to suit the new flow rates and temperature difference of plate heat exchangers. (1 set of
20.0 MW, consistent of 3 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby)

Chilled water pumps will be sized 20.5 MW based on the new legacy facilities. To achieve the
cooling capacity of 20.5 MW, the inverter speed controller will be re-adjusted to suit the new
flow rates of chilled water pumps. (1 sets 20.5 MW, consistent of 3 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby).

Total 100 Nos. of air handling unit will be re-used from the tournament mode, the following
number are required based on the new legacy mode for different facilities:
 AHU's for north stand school is 20 Nos.
 AHU’s for south stand clinics is 20 Nos.
 AHU’s for west stand office is 30 Nos.
 AHU’s for east stand apartment is 30 Nos.

Total 100 Nos. of air handling unit will be re-used from the tournament mode, the following
number are required based on the new legacy mode for different facilities:
 FCU's for north stand school is 200 Nos.
 FCU’s for south stand clinics is 200 Nos.
 FCU’s for west stand office is 300 Nos.
 FCU’s for east stand apartment is 300 Nos.

A VE opportunity on all the HVAC duct and duct accessories, Pipe and Pipe accessories etc. to
retained, reused and additional for the new legacy mode facilities

Conclusion: Based on the proposed cooling load capacity 20.5MW for the new legacy mode
facilities, the tournament cooling system will be re-used for the new legacy mode. NO
ADDITIONAL COOLING NEEDED FOR THE NEW LEGACY MODE (Refer to the details
cooling load calculation data sheet in Appendix A-16)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 276
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.6 Electrical

19.6.1 Power Demand

In the legacy mode, the power demand requirements to each facility will be updated and
distributed from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode

Total
Total power Total power
Legacy area Demand Demand
Area VA/m2 Demand Connected
requirements Factor standby
Load (KVA) Load KVA)
Load (KVA)

West Stand. Offices


total area 22665 110 2493.15 0.8 3116.44 747.95
,(Substation1)

South Stand. Clinics


total area 17248 110 1897.28 0.75 2529.71 569.18
(Substation2)

East Stand.
Apartments total 18920 100 1892.00 0.7 2702.86 567.60
area (Substation3)
North Stand. School
total 21691 110 2386.01 0.8 2982.51 715.80
area(Substation4)
TOTAL 80524 8668.44 11331.51 2600.53

The electrical distribution system will be provided for the different categories of electrical
demands throughout the legacy mode.

The design of legacy mode infrastructure will provide services to individual facilities i.e Offices,
Clinics, Apartments and School. Each building will be served by a dedicated 11kV / 415 Volts
tournament mode substation.

In the VE design, the power demand requirements for tournament mode of the stadium will be
as per the following:
 The total power demand load is 15500 KVA
 The total power connected load is 20357.08 KVA.
 The total power demand standby Load is 3100 KVA.

Conclusion, the power demand load for Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential
far exceeds the requirements of the legacy mode requirements and hence it will be retained.

19.6.2 Incoming Power Distribution Medium Voltage (MV)

In the legacy mode, the estimated total power demand load is 8668.44 KVA and the estimated
total connected load is 11331.51 KVA.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 277
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

The Tournament mode four substations will be retained and reused for legacy mode facilities
i.e., Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School.

The Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential MV panels will be retained.
However, The Tournament Essential back up MV panels will be removed.

In the VE design, the power demand requirements for the stadium will be as per the following:
 The total power demand load is 15500 KVA
 The total power connected load is 20357.08 KVA.

Conclusion, MV panels for the Tournament Essential back up will be eliminated and the space
for these MV rooms can be reutilized for other purposes.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated medium voltage power
supply and installation approval.

19.6.3 Energy management system (EMS)

In the legacy mode, one main KAHRAMAA KWH meter will be provided at the low voltage side
in clinic and school buildings respectively.

Office building will have Electrical Tenant energy metering according to the number of tenants
on each floor in addition to landlord meters

Apartment building will have Electrical Tenant energy metering according to the number of
apartments in addition to landlord meters

Tenant energy metering will be accommodated within the electrical rooms.

In the VE design, The Low Voltage (LV) switchboards will be equipped with integral KAHRAMAA
meters for the Tournament mode.

Conclusion, Additional Tenant meters will be provided to suit the legacy mode and KAHRAMAA
requirements.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the additional Tenant meters approval.

19.6.4 Transformers

In the legacy mode, the power demand requirements to each facility will updated and distributed
from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 278
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode
Total
Legacy area power No of Total Demand
No of Generators
requirements Demand Transformers standby Load
Load

West Stand. Offices


total area 2493.15 2.00 ( 1600KVA) 747.95 1 set (1000KVA)
(Substation1)

South Stand. Clinics


total area 1897.28 2.00 ( 1600KVA) 569.18 1 set (750KVA)
(Substation4)

East Stand.
Apartments total 1892.00 2.00 ( 1600KVA) 567.60 1 set (750KVA)
area (Substation3)

North Stand. School


total 2386.01 2.00 ( 1600KVA) 715.80 1 set (1000KVA)
area(Substation2)
TOTAL 8668.44 2600.53

Transformer equipment sizes are generally based on 1600KVA, with allowance of 20% spare
capacity.

The transformers located in the tournament mode four substations will be retained and reused
for legacy mode.

In the VE design, number of transformers for the tournament mode in the four substations as
shown below:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for VE


Total Total
Total No of
power Demand
VE area Demand power No of Generator
Demand standby
requirements Factor Connected Transformers s (Life
Load Load
Load (KVA) safety)
(KVA) (KVA)
1 set
Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 4 (1600KVA) 836.73
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 4 (1600KVA) 772.50
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 4 (1600KVA) 739.43
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 4 (1600KVA) 751.34
(1000KVA)
15500.0
TOTAL 20357.08 3100.00
0

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 279
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion, in legacy mode each substation will have two transformers instead of four.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated transformer loads and
installation approval.

19.6.5 11 KV Generators (100% Redundancy) and LV Standby power (Life safety


generators)

In the legacy mode, the standby power demand requirements for each facility will be updated
and distributed from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode

Legacy area Total power No of Total Demand


No of Generators
requirements Demand Load Transformers standby Load

West Stand. Offices


2.00 (
total area 2493.15 747.95 1 set (1000KVA)
1600KVA)
(Substation1)

South Stand. Clinics


2.00 (
total area 1897.28 569.18 1 set (750KVA)
1600KVA)
(Substation2)

East Stand.
2.00 (
Apartments total 1892.00 567.60 1 set (750KVA)
1600KVA)
area (Substation3)

North Stand. School


2.00 (
total 2386.01 715.80 1 set (1000KVA)
1600KVA)
area(Substation4)
TOTAL 8668.44 2600.53

Each building will reuse the LV generators located in the tournament mode generator rooms.

Emergency standby generator will supply the following loads for each building in case of loss of
normal power supply.
 Life support system – smoke extract fans, stair pressurization fans & etc.
 Pumps – fire, water, sump & sewage lift
 Selected elevators and fire lift
 Emergency / egress lighting, Exit illumination, exit signs, step lights
 Fire Alarm System
 Selected lighting for the building, essential plant areas, BMS & Security Room and
telecommunications equipment rooms.
 Selected PC’s
 Data equipment of the Telecommunication system

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 280
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

 IT Room air conditioning


 Security, CCTV & Access control System, Control Systems, Building Management
System

In the VE design, there are LV generators (life safety) for the tournament mode in four
substations distributed as shown below:

Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for VE

Total Total
power Total power Demand No of
VE area Demand No of
Demand Connected standby Generators
requirements Factor Transformers
Load Load (KVA) Load (Life safety)
(KVA) (KVA)

1 set
Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 4 (1600KVA) 836.73
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 4 (1600KVA) 772.50
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 4 (1600KVA) 739.43
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 4 (1600KVA) 751.34
(1000KVA)
TOTAL 15500.00 20357.08 3100.00

Conclusion- The tournament mode LV generators (life safety) serve the tournament Non-
Essential and Tournament – Essential. These generators will be retained and readjusted to
suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.6.6 Low voltage (LV) power distribution

In the legacy mode, each building will reuse the Main/Sub Main Distribution Board (MDB/SMDB
- 415/240V), located in the tournament main low voltage room.

Each building floor will reuse the electrical room to accommodate Bus Duct/ cables riser, floor
Distribution Board (DB) and distribution boards for landlord services.

Additional new DB’s serving the apartments/offices loads will be located within each
apartments/offices for tenant uses. The Power to these DB's will be distributed from the floor
MDB's, via cables.

In the VE design, the low voltage distribution for the Tournament Non- Essential, Tournament
Essential and the Tournament Essential back up is serving the four tournament mode
substations.

Conclusion, in legacy mode each substation will have two number of Low voltage panels instead
of four.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated low voltage panels loads
and installation approval.

19.6.7 Power factor correction capacitor

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 281
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In the legacy mode, each building will reuse the Power factor correction located in the
tournament mode four substations.

In the VE design, the power factor correction equipment Tournament Non- Essential,
Tournament Essential and the Tournament Essential back up is serving the four tournament
mode substations.

Conclusion, The Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential power factor correction
equipment will be retained. However, the Tournament Essential back up power factor correction
equipment will be removed.

In legacy mode each substation will have two number of power factor correction capacitor banks
instead of four.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated power factor correction
and installation approval.

19.6.8 Rising Bus bar / Cables

In the legacy mode, the four tournament mode substations will be retained and reused to serve
the individual Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School building.

Each building will reuse the busbars /cables equipment located in the tournament mode main
low voltage rooms and the 8 electrical services risers will be retained.

The tournament mode multicore armoured cables / busbars will be retained and readjusted to
suite legacy mode, which will be served from the LV panels located in the four tournament mode
substations and connected to MDBs located in each building (selection according to voltage
drop calculations).

The tournament mode wiring will be reused. However, any additional wiring will be concealed
within ceiling voids or cast-in conduits within walls, in all areas except closets and mechanical
spaces where they can be run exposed.

In the VE design, the stadium has 8 electrical service risers severing all electrical systems

Conclusion, the service risers within the tournament mode will be reused to serve the legacy
mode loads with adjustment to suit.

Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated busbars /cables and
installation approval.

19.6.9 Uninterrupted power supply (UPS)

In the legacy mode, the Uninterruptible Power Supplies provided in tournament mode will be
reused and will be used to supply power to the following systems:

Selected equipment of the Telecommunication system.

Building Management System.

Clinical Equipment and any other critical equipments.

Security, CCTV & Access control System as per MOI requirements.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 282
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Battery backup time of UPS for item 1 to 3 above will be 5 minutes as used in tournament mode
since all the UPS will be fed from generator supply. 60 minutes’ backup time will be provided
for Security, CCTV & Access control System as per MOI requirements same as in tournament
mode.

In the VE design, the tournament mode Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) is provided for Field
of play lighting, Emir Suite, VOC and Main communication room (PTA).

Conclusion- UPS for Field of play lighting, Emir Suite, VOC will not be required in Legacy mode.
These UPS and batteries will be reconfigured and reused as per Legacy mode requirements.

19.6.10 Grounding system

In the legacy mode, the grounding system serving the stadium will be retained and reused.

The tournament mode earthing system located at each substation will be retained.

The tournament mode clean and functional earthing system located in each communications
room, incoming telecom room, ELV rooms will be retained.

The tournament mode earth pits will be retained.

In the VE design, main MV and LV earth bars will be included in each substation and will be
wall mounted in an accessible location. The clean and functional earthing system will be
included for bonding selected equipment and systems to a clean network in each
communications room, incoming telecom room, plant rooms and where required.

Conclusion, The tournament mode grounding system serving the stadium will be retained for
legacy mode.

19.6.11 Lightning Protection

In the legacy mode, the lightning protection system serving the stadium will be retained.

The tournament mode lightning protection pits will be retained.

In the VE design, using Non-Conventional lightning protection system instead of the current
conventional lightning protection system is proposed.

Conclusion, the tournament mode lightning protection system serving the stadium will be
retained and reused for legacy mode.

19.6.12 Cable carrying system (containment)

In the legacy mode, the cable carrying systems serving the stadium will be retained and reused
for legacy mode. However, additional cable carrying system will be added to suite the new
requirements for each building

The tournament mode Containment system, HDGI cable ladders / cable trays will be reused
where required to suite the new requirements for each building

In the VE design, the cable carrying systems (containment) include cable trays, cable trunking
and cable baskets in the ceiling voids. The cable tray size will be designed to accommodate the
cables run in them.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 283
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion, the tournament mode Containment system will be retained and reused where
required to suite the new requirements for each building.

19.6.13 Small Power

In the legacy mode, the small power and wiring devices serving the stadium will be retained and
reused. However, additional small power and wiring devices will be added to suite the new
requirements for each building.

All apartment, offices, school, clinic and public areas will utilize small power and wiring
accessory plates to suite architecture / interior design requirements.

In the VE design, the general power system include the general purpose switched socket
outlets, socket outlets, fused connection units and power, isolators of ancillary systems
optimized to suit arch. / Interior design requirements.

Conclusion, the tournament mode small power and wiring devices serving the stadium will be
retained and reused for legacy mode. However, additional small power and wiring devices will
be added to suite the new requirements for each building.

19.7 Lighting System

19.7.1 External Feature lighting

In legacy mode design, external feature lighting will be required since exterior façade will be
retained.

The lighting of the exterior and interior of the vessel for the Tournament mode will be retained
as it is. The upper tier will be removed in legacy mode and hence Roof graze lighting will be
removed.

Conclusion - Lighting of the exterior and interior of the vessel will be reused.

19.7.2 Interior Lighting

In legacy mode design, interior lighting will be required as per Legacy layout and space
planning.

The interior lighting for the Tournament mode will be retained as far a possible if it suits the
Legacy space requirement.

Conclusion - The lighting will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.7.3 Field of Play Lighting

The Field of play lighting and stadium lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.

19.7.4 Pitch Grow Lighting

Pitch grow lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.7.5 House lighting

Legacy mode the house lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 284
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.7.6 Lighting Control

In Legacy design mode, Separate lighting control system will be required for each development.

The Lighting control system for the Tournament mode will be reused.

Conclusion - The lighting control system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Lighting control system will be removed for Field of play area and for areas that are removed in
legacy mode.

19.7.7 Emergency Lighting

In Legacy design mode, independent Emergency Lighting system will be required for each
development.

The Emergency Lighting system for the Tournament mode will be reused. System design as 4
risers in tournament mode and can be reused for legacy mode development.

Conclusion - The Emergency Lighting system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan
layout.

19.7.8 Obstacle (Obstruction) lighting

In Legacy design mode, obstacle lighting is required.

The system designed for Tournament mode will be reused.

Conclusion - Since the façade will be retained, the Obstacle lighting will be retained as it is.

19.8 Fire Detection, Alarms and Life Systems


19.8.1 Fire Alarm & Detection System

In legacy mode design, 8 FACPs will be required. Each development (School, apartment, clinic
and office) will be provided with 2 FACPs. All 8 FACPs will be networked and will be served by
common Fire Command center.

Tournament mode has 8 FACPs and all the Fire Alarm & Detection System for the Tournament
mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.

Conclusion - FA Devices will be reused and readjusted as per new layouts.

19.8.2 PAVA SYSTEMS

19.8.2.1 Emergency Voice Alarm communication

In legacy mode design, each development (School, apartment, clinic and office) will be provided
with an independent EVAC system.

Tournament mode has 4 separate risers for Emergency Voice Alarm communication.
Tournament mode EVAC system will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Voice Alarm in Spectator areas will be removed.

Conclusion - EVAC devices will be reused and readjusted as per new layouts.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 285
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

19.8.2.2 Public address / Sport entertainment

Public address / Sport entertainment system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.

19.8.2.3 Concert support

Concert support system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.8.2.4 Emergency Stewards Telephone System

The Emergency Telephone (Intercom) system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.

19.8.2.5 Fire Telephone

In legacy mode design, 4 no Fire telephone risers will be required.

Tournament mode has 4 separate risers for Fire telephone. This Fire Telephone system in
tournament mode will be retained.

Conclusion - No major modification required.

19.8.2.6 Emergency Voice Communication System (Refuge)

This system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.8.2.7 Disabled Persons Alarm system

System will be required in Legacy mode especially in Clinic areas.

The Disabled Persons Alarm system will be retained and reused / readjusted as per new
layouts.

Conclusion - No major modification required.

19.8.2.8 Referee Call System

The Referee Call System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.9 ICT SYSTEMS

19.9.1 Key Spaces

In legacy mode design, 2 ICT rooms per floor will be required in each development (School,
apartment, clinic and office).

ICT system will be retained from tournament mode. 2 ICT rooms per floor in each zone are
available in tournament mode. Rooms will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout if
required. ICT areas related to MOI, External Mobile/Radio Equipment Spaces, and Central
Apparatus Room for Broadcast will be removed.

Conclusion - Tournament Mode Rack and active equipment could be reused.

19.9.2 Structured cabling system

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 286
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

In legacy mode design, Structured Cabling System will be required.

Structured Cabling System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy
mode plan layout. There will be addition of data outlets as per Legacy mode requirement.

Conclusion - The SCS system need to be added as per Legacy mode layouts and tournament
mode outlets will be reused and readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.9.3 Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN)

In legacy mode design, 4 Nos WLAN system will be required.

WLAN System for the Tournament mode has 4 nos WLAN risers and will be retained and reused
to suite legacy mode plan layout.

Conclusion - The WLAN system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.9.4 Building Data Network

In legacy mode design, 4 Nos Building data networks will be required.

Data Network System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy
mode plan layout.

Conclusion - The data network system in the tournament mode will be reconfigured into 4
networks and readjusted to suite legacy mode.

19.9.5 Building Network Central Clock System

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.9.6 Public Mobile Cellular System

In legacy mode design, this system will be required.

System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.

Conclusion - No major modification required.

19.9.7 Venue Private Mobile Radio System

19.9.7.1 Venue Operator TETRA system

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.9.7.2 MOI TETRA system & MOI 4G LTE system

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
19.9.8 Spectator Electronic Access Control System (SEAC)

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.10 Audio Visual and Multimedia

19.10.1 IPTV System

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 287
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

Moziac system will be required for Residential areas. New risers will be provided as per
Residential unit layouts.

19.10.2 Hospitality Box

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.10.3 Offices

In legacy mode design, Offices will require AV system.

This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.

Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.10.4 Meeting Room

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.10.5 Press Conference Area

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.10.6 Digital Signage

Legacy mode design will require a Digital Signage system.

This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.

Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.10.7 Room Booking system

Legacy mode design will require a Room booking system.

This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.

Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.

19.10.8 Giant Screen

This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.

19.11 BMS

BMS system will be required for each development in Legacy mode.

The System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 288
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Conclusion - Necessary modification to be done to system configuration to split into 4 BMS


systems – 1 for each development. All 4 systems will be networked and monitored at a central
location.

19.12 CCTV

In legacy mode design, each facility (School, Office, Clinic and Residential) will be required with
CCTV coverages and each facility have different requirements. 4 nos CCTV System risers and
network equipment’s with a common monitoring facility will be required.

In tournament mode, the CCTV provision (i.e. 10%R Detect, 25%R Observe, 50%R Recognise,
120%R Identify) is provided as per Emiri Decree No.9. There is extensive CCTV coverage of
the facility in tournament mode.

Conclusion - CCTV System for the Tournament mode will be sufficient for Legacy mode
requirements. CCTV installation in stadium bowl will not be required and can be reused in other
areas. System needs to be reconfigured and reused to suite legacy mode requirement. The
CCTV locations will need to be modified to suite the legacy mode plan layouts. Central
monitoring location in Tournament mode can be reused.

19.13 Access Control Systems

In legacy mode design, each facility (School, Office, Clinic and Residential) will be required with
access control system and each facility have specific requirement. 4 nos ACS System network
and equipment’s will be required.

In tournament mode, electronic and mechanical access control systems are provided.

Conclusion - ACS System for the Tournament mode will be sufficient for Legacy mode
requirements. System needs to be reconfigured and reused to suite legacy mode requirement.
The ACS locations will need to be modified to suite the legacy mode plan layouts.

19.14 Infrastructure
Document D2.1, Section 2, mentions of Legacy mode requirements:

The proposed infrastructure plans do not impact D3 Road, except for running a 5m utilities
corridor along it right of way. Permanency of D3 Road is not impacted in terms of design or
construction. Permanency of LRT rail alignment is also not impacted by the Infrastructures.
Below is extract from TIS Report showing the alignment. There might be some utilities crossing
the LRT route, however, will not impact upon their design or construction.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 289
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

LRT Alignment in the Stadium area

Following issues have been considered in Infrastructures VE exercise in complying with the
Legacy mode requirements:

19.14.1 Utilities within the precinct - connections

Two particular utilities cross into precinct – Foul Sewer and Electrical. All other utilities either tie
into utilities supply from D3 Road or are self-contained within the project site. The extract below
on the left shows the existing road and proposed road as part of D3 Road (note the bell mouths
along the road suggesting road through the Precinct).

As can be compared with the utilities corridor drawing on the right, both the Foul sewer and the
electrical routing consider the future roads that branch from D3 Road.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 290
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Road Layout Utilities corridors proposed

The Foul Sewer outfall is in A3 Road and


it connects road bell mouths of D3 Road
and A3 Road. This is consistent with
Schematic Design. It also matches the tie-
in points provided by LREDC (Refer to
Drawing Extract below). LREDC data is
taken from Tender Addendum No. 2,
Appendix E. note should be made of tie-in
connection no. 5. On this basis, it can be
assumed that the Foul Sewer connection
is unlikely going to impact the Legacy
mode adversely.

Data extract from LREDC – Foul Sewer


tie-in points

Electrical connections follow Road right of


way, along the provided road layout and
so are unlikely to impact the Legacy Mode
adversely.

19.14.2 Utilities demand/outflows

The utilities connections made to the stadium will cater for the demand or outflows identified in
the stadium, both for tournament stage and Legacy stage.

The pipe sizes and cable capacities will account during detailed design for any additional
capacities required during Legacy mode.

At this stage, the Electric power supply has been provided with twice the number of ducts (100%
for redundancy and additional 100% surplus capacity for future) i.e. where 4 nos. MV cables

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 291
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

are proposed, additional 8 nos. ducts are provided. This is likely going to suffice for Legacy
Mode.

For foul sewer line crossing the precinct, the size may have to be re-evaluated based on
information from LREDC whether any future lines are going to outfall into this pipe. However,
current 500mm provision seems to be reasonable based on engineering judgement.

Stormwater provision and Roads layout in the Precinct are proposed to be temporary and so
have no impact on the Legacy mode.

19.14.3 Impact to Theatre District

The proposed infrastructure plans or the utilities connections, do not cross the proposed Theatre
District based on the VE proposed. In Schematic Design an 1100mm pipe was crossing the
district. However, under the VE design, all the stormwater is proposed to be contained by a
“Wadi necklace” in the Stadium project area. The stormwater design plans and road layouts in
the area are beyond the D&B scope. However, they are proposed to be temporary and so have
no impact under Legacy Mode.

Based on the above discussions, it can be inferred that the infrastructure plans proposed will
have no impact on to the Legacy mode requirements.

The Foul Sewer outfall is in A3 Road and it connects road bell mouths of D3 Road and A3 Road.
This is consistent with Schematic Design.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 292
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20 VE of Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to FIFA Compliance

20.1 Introduction

Tricon has been requested by Graham Simpson of KEO to provide commentary on the design
proposals for a modified scheme design for Lusail stadium which would form the basis of AFL’s
submission as part of a part D&B tender team under a contractor based in Asia. The notes
below summarise our input to date, as given is a tele-conference with Graham Simpson on 28
July 2016.

Tricon was a part of the original design team on the scheme with Foster + Partners. Significant
changes since that scheme are:
 A reduction in capacity.
 No requirement for Legacy. The stadium will be designed to meet Tournament only.
 The stadium is to be just FIFA compliant. There is some ambiguity over the extent of SC
compliance that may be sought, on which we have commented.

20.2 SC Standards

The designs were developed originally to comply with SC-APW-SOC-AAA-STD-00002 inter alia
but were then progressed in the light of value engineering, responses to RFI’s and the
November 2015 issuing of SC-ACV-CAFQSC-STD-00005 affecting the planning of concessions
in particular.

20.2.1 SC-APW-SOC-AAA-STD-00002

Two notable impacts of this are:


 Permanent BOH connectivity required between the main kitchen and all finishing/
hospitality kitchens (the SC accepted that where the VIP Lounge had two finishing
kitchens this would be applied to the north only in the interests of VE).
 Concessions required to support the expected ‘normal’ attendance in Legacy were to be
capable of full cooking, including frying, and to have storage for chilled and frozen goods.
This would no longer apply if there is no Legacy but the requirements of McDonald’s as
a major sponsor require consideration.

20.2.2 SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005

The impacts of SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005 in relation to food & beverage and their


application to the original scheme for Lusail were:
REFERENCE REQUIREMENT COMMENTS
4.64 POS repair office of 20m2 Applied
4.68 Fixed POS in concessions as 1/250 The 1/250 is FIFA. The 1.5m exceeds
and 1.5m per POS FIFA but was applied to both Lusail and
4th Precinct. For the 5th Precinct, the SC
agreed to 1.2m which is marginally
below FIFA by some 0.05m but was in
the interests of VE.
4.69 Hawkers hubs of 18m2 minimum In reality, several of this size are needed.
4.70 Concessionaire office of 16m2 for 4 On the basis of it being 4-person, it had to
be larger.
4.71 Concessionaire cash office of 16m2 Applied

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 293
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

REFERENCE REQUIREMENT COMMENTS


4.72 Concession staff changing of 200m2 Applied
with 1,000 lockers

20.3 Concessions

The provision of concessions and mobile POS had been determined from an amalgam of three
slightly conflicting sources:
 FIFA 5
 SC standards under SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005
 SC crowd modelling standards under SC-C06-CAB-TRN-TQP-POP-16-00017

The requirements under each are stated as:


FIFA SC-ACV-CAF- SC MINIMUM
QSCSTD-00005 REQUIREMENT
FOR THE STADIUM
Fixed POS Number 1/250 1/250 1/250
Concession
Counter length/ 1.25-1.67m 1.5m 1.2m
POS
Mobile POS POS Number 1/1,000 Not stated but assumed to be FIFA
Hawkers Number 1/600 compliant

The planning of the concessions had been based on 1 fixed POS per 250 GA’s and 1.5m per
POS, thus it was FIFA and SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005 compliant. The more recent issue
of Crowd Movement Standards, document SC-C06-CAB-TRN-TQP-POP-16-00017, sets also
a target for 40% of the GA’s to be served at halftime.

This was met by increasing the provision of mobile POS and hawkers.

20.4 Main Kitchen

20.4.1 Permanent or Temporary

The Main Kitchen exists primarily to support the hospitality requirements of the stadium as the
food sold in the concessions will be prepared largely from part-prepared product bought-in
ready-to-cook and serve or some simply to serve. The Main Kitchen prepares the hospitality
requirements from raw ingredients and sends the finished or part-finished dishes to the finishing
kitchens local to the hospitality areas. Dishes may be prepared in advance and held chilled.
However, such part-prepared or fully-prepared dishes could be provided also by an external
commissary kitchen located in the Precinct.

The Main Kitchen was originally planned as a permanent element on account of the Legacy
proposals. The stadium being designed only to meet the requirements of Tournament means
now that it will be used some eight times and there is no Legacy driving an ongoing requirement.
This could allow the Main Kitchen to be offsite by locating it in the adjacent Precinct and using
a temporary kitchen structure such as those provided by the likes of PKL for the Olympics.

The greatest benefit is derived if the Main kitchen is in the Precinct with direct connection to the
stadium either via a grade level link or by underground tunnel. Such connection allows trolleys
to be moved into the stadium without vehicular loading/ unloading and it allows all raw goods

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 294
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

entering the Main Kitchen and stores to be security checked without a need for a further check
on movement into the stadium. The impact on areas would be:
MAIN AREA SUB-AREA ONSITE MAIN SUPPLY VIA AN
KITCHEN OFFSITE
COMMISSARY
Level B1 Loading Dock  
Bulk Beverage Stores  Removed offsite
Dry Goods and Disposable Stores   (reduced)
Staff Changing  Removed offsite
Preparation areas in Main Kitchen  Deleted
Hot and Cold Kitchens  Deleted
Portioning Area  Removed subject
to distance
Holding of prepared dishes  
Dishwashing  
Utensil Washing  Deleted
Offices  Removed offsite
All Levels Finishing Kitchens  

20.4.2 Areas

The following table shows the extent of areas required in the stadium if the kitchen were reduced
or removed to a remote location, both with a connection or without.
DESCRIPTION EXISTING REDUCED CONNECTED UNCONNECTED
(M2) (M2) REMOTE REMOTE
(M2) (M2)
Food Storage 115 80 0 0
Beverage Storage 45 45 45 45
Preparation, Hot Kitchen, 565 500 0 0
Cold Kitchen and Portioning
Cold Holding 145 125 30 125
Dish Wash, Trolley Wash, 210 180 0 0
Trolley Park and Ice
Production
Equipment Store 35 0 0 0
Pots Wash 70 60 0 0
TOTAL 1,185 990 75 170

20.5 Hospitality Finishing Kitchens

The original design of the stadium had already been designed utilizing the smallest support
areas possible on each of the hospitality areas and was supported with direct connection to the
basement support to minimize holding and allowing replenishment throughout an event. The
design also had a central ware wash (unless specifically requested otherwise) to allow for a
delayed wash up process that could continue once the event had finished.

We have recalculated the support facilities required in addition to the Main Kitchen and Stores
Areas.

Below is a table showing the existing proposed calculation for BOH areas broken down into
each of the different hospitality areas. We have then calculated the revised BOH support areas
to reflect the reduced and identified this in the table that follows. We have assumed the strategy
previously set out would continue for the new design. This leads to a reduction in area from
1,025m² to 760m².

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 295
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20.6 Existing Proposed Provision

20.6.1 VIP Provision


AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT
AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

VIP Lounge Plaza 1,977 1,318 988 Northern 117 Regen and remote wash up

Southern 117 Regen and remote wash up

VIP Lounge VIP 844 562 422 Northern 58 Regen and remote wash up

Southern 58 Regen and remote wash up

TOTAL 1,880 1,410 350

20.6.2 VVIP Lounge

AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT


AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Lounge L01 1,000 300 Northern 58 Regen and remote wash up

Southern 58 Regen and remote wash up

TOTAL 300 116

20.6.3 Emiri Provision

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 296
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN NOTE


AREA
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Emiri Lounge EMIRI 750 70 119 Full cooking and wash up

20.6.4 Skybox Provision

AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT


AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Skyboxes L02 N/A 2,075 Northeast 40 Regen and remote wash up

Northwest 40 Regen and remote wash up

Southeast 40 Regen and remote wash up

Southwest 40 Regen and remote wash up

TOTAL 160

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 297
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20.6.5 Hospitality Provision


AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT
AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)
Northeast Club L01 N/A 1,631 Northeast 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Lounge

Northwest L01 N/A 1,087 Northwest 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge

Southeast L01 N/A 1,631 Southeast 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge

Southwest L01 N/A 1,087 Southwest 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge

TOTAL 5,436 280

20.7 Revised Proposed Provision

20.7.1 VIP Provision

AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT


AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

VIP Lounge L02 1,939 1,350 Northern 100 Regen and remote wash up

Southern 100 Regen and remote wash up

TOTAL 1,350 200

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 298
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20.7.2 VVIP Lounge


AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT
AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Lounge L03 769 150 120 Full cooking and wash up

TOTAL 150 120

20.7.3 Skybox Provision

AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT


AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Skyboxes L03 4,029 2,136 Northeast 40 Regen and remote wash up

Northwest 40 Regen and remote wash up

Southeast 40 Regen and remote wash up

Southwest 40 Regen and remote wash up

TOTAL 160

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 299
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20.7.4 Hospitality Provision


AREA LEVEL DINING CAPACITY KITCHEN/BOH SUPPORT
AREA NOTE
BUFFET OR SEATED LOCATION AREA (M2) FACILITIES
(M2)

Hospitality L02 N/A 5,000 Northeast 70 Glass wash and storage only

Northwest 70 Glass wash and storage only

Southeast 70 Glass wash and storage only

Southwest 70 Glass wash and storage only

TOTAL 160

Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 300
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

20.8 CONCESSIONS

Based on the latest numbers for GA’s, we estimate the required numbers of POS for
concessions, mobiles and hawkers to meet FIFA to be:
LEVEL Capacity FIFA
Concession Mobile Stands Hawker Total
Base Build POS based on Temporary Additional Total of both
1/250 POS based on hawker
1/1000 based on
1/600
POS POS POS POS

Plaza 24,480 98 25 41 164

0 0 0 0 0

Level 05 27,307 110 28 46 184

Level 06 15,047 61 16 26 103

Level 07 13,375 54 14 23 91

TOTAL 80,209 323 83 136 542

From our experience the uplift to meet crowd modelling standards may be around 10% to the
mobiles/hawkers.

We suggest that:
 All of the concessions with food might be re-heat only so that ducted kitchen extract is
not required apart from the number required to satisfy the requirement of McDonald’s.
However, if the latter went into the Precinct, similar to the restaurant at London 2012,
even that might be avoided.
 At least 1/3rd of concessions might be beverage only as such a ratio has been accepted
by the SC on other stadia.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 301
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

21 VE of Miscellaneous Opportunities, including minor commodity items

21.1 Topic

Text…..

21.1.1 Subtopic

Text…..

21.2 Topic

Text…..

21.2.1 Subtopic

Text…..

21.2.1.1 Subtopic

Text….
 Bullet

o Sub-bullet

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 302
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

22 Appendices

Appendix A Supporting Information: Calculations, Reports, Cost Estimates and


Sketches

A-1 VE of Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance

00-00-DR-A-20101 Level 0 Pitch

00-01-DR-A-20101 Level 1 Concourse

00-02-DR-A-20101 Level 2 Hospitality / ViP

00-03-DR-A-20101 Level 3 Sky Box / VViP

00-04-DR-A-20101 Level 4 Plant

00-05-DR-A-20101 Level 5 Upper concourse 1

00-06-DR-A-20101 Level 6 Upper concourse 2

00-07-DR-A-20101 Level 7 Upper concourse 3

00-08-DR-A-20101 Level 8 Plant

00-09-DR-A-20101 Level 9 Overall Bowl

00-05-DR-A-72101 Stadium Seating Lower

00-09-DR-A-72101 Stadium Seating Upper

00-10-DR-A-20101 – Roof Plan

00-XX-DR-A-20301 Sections

XX-XX-SK-A-06000 Level 00 Players Legacy Areas (Shall be part of Stage 5)

XX-XX-SK-A-06001 Level 01 Lower Concourse Legacy Areas (Shall be part of Stage 5)

XX-XX-SK-A-06002 Level 02 Hospitality Legacy Areas (Shall be part of Stage 5)

XX-XX-SK-A-06003 Level 03 SkyBox / VViP Legacy Areas (Shall be part of Stage 5)

XX-XX-SK-A-06004 Level 05 Upper Concourse Legacy Areas (Shall be part of Stage 5)

SOA-FIFA WCF Schedule of Areas

00-XX-DR-A-20601 - Stadium Bowl, 3d views

00-ZZ-DR-A-72101 - Stadium Bowl - 190m line comparison

00-ZZ-DR-A-72102 - Obstructed views due to advertising hoarding

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 303
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Broadcast areas
Ceremonies
FIFA/LOC offices
Media_Ancillary
Media_FIFA New Media Areas
Media_Mixed Zone
Media_Press Conference Room
Medical facilities/Doping control_Ancillary
Medical facilities/Doping control_Players'
Medical Room
Parking Facilities
Plant
Playing area/Dressing room_Ancillary
Playing area/Dressing room_Indoor warm up
area & Dressing room & Showers and toilets
facilities
Security Services_Ancillary
Security Services_Stewards' Holding Area
Service compounds
Service road/Service tunnel
Stadium signage and decor_Ancillary
Stadium signage and decor_Signage Storage
Vertical Circulation
VVIP/VIP

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-0, Pitch
GIA: 37658 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-00-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Hospitality_Lounges
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation
VVIP/VIP

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-1, Concourse

GIA: 15171 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-01-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Hospitality_Ancillary
Hospitality_Lounges
Plant
Vertical Circulation
VIP_Ancillary
VIP_Lounge

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-2, Hospitality
GIA :14608 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-02-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Hospitality_Ancillary
Hospitality_Skyboxes & Suites
Media
Plant
Security Services
Vertical Circulation
VVIP_Ancillary
VVIP_Lounges

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-3, Skyboxes VVIP

GIA:11698 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-03-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Floor
Plant
Vertical Circulation

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-4, Plant
GIA: 5912 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-04-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Media
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-5, Upper Concourse 1
GIA: 17581 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-05-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SEATING SCHEDULE
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
Type AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
LOWER TIER original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
GA - CONCOURSE LOWER TIER
26768
HOSPITALITY ITEM ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
5118 Gross Seating Capacity 91,271 N/A
SKY BOXES Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to team N/A 0
2212 benches/seating areas
VIP Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to N/A 1118
advertising board
1350
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the camera location N/A 102
VVIP
154 Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the media stand N/A 6182

35602 VIP / VVIP N/A 1500


Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the ceremonies N/A 0
platform
UPPER TIER
Seat kills due to the view obstruction that spectators in these seats N/A Presentation
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 5 would cause to the TV presentation studios/VOC (i.e. affected views studios: 260,
32508 from the TV studios and Venue Operations Centre) VOC:260
Total: 520
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 6
Seat kills due to the construction of temporary access paths that have N/A Unknown until
14752 to be established to allow for an additional spectator flow into certain detail design
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 7 regions of the seating area.

8004 Seat kills / seats with a view obstruction on any stand due to handrails, N/A Unknown until
sector segregation fences, structural elements, etc. detail design
55264
Any other seat kills due to the facilities or constructions obstructing the N/A 1849
Grand total: 90866 view.
+ 405 disabled TOTAL NUMBER OF REDUCTIONS 11,271

Gross seating capacity total: 91,271 GROSS SEATING CAPACITY MINUS TOTAL OF SEATS REMOVED 80,000

P 2 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 1 19.07.16 MR 1ST ISSUE

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

Stadium Seating, Lower Tier

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT


161519 1 : 500 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev

STAGE 4 P2
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-05-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-6, Upper Concourse 2

GIA: 6951 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-06-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-7, Upper Concourse 3
GIA: 4216 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-07-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

By Department Legend
Plant
Vertical Circulation

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-8, Plant

GIA :4216 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-08-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 05.08.16 MK 3rd Issue of draft plans
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

General Arrangement,
Level-9, Overall Bowl

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked MR


161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-09-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
SEATING SCHEDULE AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

Type AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
LOWER TIER
GA - CONCOURSE LOWER TIER
26768
HOSPITALITY ITEM ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS

5118 Gross Seating Capacity 91,271 N/A


SKY BOXES Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to team N/A 0
2212 benches/seating areas

VIP Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to N/A 1118
advertising board
1350 Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the camera location N/A 102
VVIP
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the media stand N/A 6182
154
35602 VIP / VVIP N/A 1500
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the ceremonies N/A 0
platform
UPPER TIER Seat kills due to the view obstruction that spectators in these seats N/A Presentation
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 5 would cause to the TV presentation studios/VOC (i.e. affected views studios: 260,
from the TV studios and Venue Operations Centre) VOC:260
32508 Total: 520
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 6 Seat kills due to the construction of temporary access paths that have N/A Unknown until
14752 to be established to allow for an additional spectator flow into certain detail design
regions of the seating area.
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 7
Seat kills / seats with a view obstruction on any stand due to handrails, N/A Unknown until
8004 sector segregation fences, structural elements, etc. detail design
55264
Any other seat kills due to the facilities or constructions obstructing the N/A 1849
Grand total: 90866 view.
+ 405 disabled TOTAL NUMBER OF REDUCTIONS 11,271

Gross seating capacity total: 91,271 GROSS SEATING CAPACITY MINUS TOTAL OF SEATS REMOVED 80,000

P 2 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 1 19.07.16 MR 1ST ISSUE

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

Stadium Seating, Upper Tier

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT


161519 1 : 500 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev

STAGE 4 P2
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-09-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
R48 R01 R02
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

R47 Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work
R03 commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only
R46 R04
This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written
permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

R45 R05 DISCLAIMER


When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
R44 R06 AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

R43 R07

R42 R08

R41 R09

R40 R10

R39 R11

R38 R12

P 1 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


R-A rev rev
R37 R13 no. date rev by
description

project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
R36 R14 Employer

R35 R15
client

KEO International Consultants

R34 R16
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

R33 R17 t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

R32 R18

R31 R19

drawing title

R30 R20 Roof Plan

R29 R21
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
R28 R22 dwg purpose status rev

STAGE 4 P1
R27 R23 bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

R26 R24 161519-AFL- 00-10-DR-A-20101


R25
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

Stadium Bowl - 3d View From Lower Tier Stadium Bowl - 3d View from the Upper Tier
1 2

P 1 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

Stadium Bowl, 3d views

Stadium Bowl - 3d View from VVIP Stadium Bowl - 3d View from the Pitch
3 4
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT
161519 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev

P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-XX-DR-A-20601
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

Key:
Line denotes boundary of the
190 metres 'reccommended
view range' line

P 1 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue

rev rev
description
00

no. date rev by

00
00

project

00
19

Lusail Stadium

19
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK

Tender Scheme Proposed VE Scheme M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
Percentage of seats Percentage of seats e: mail@afl-uk.com

beyond the 190m line: 12% beyond the 190m line: 5% twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

Stadium Bowl - 190m line


comparaison

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT


161519 1 : 1000 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev

Information P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-ZZ-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

OBSTRUCTED VIEWS - ADVERTISING


Type

GA - CONCOURSE LOWER TIER


1118
Grand total: 1118

P 1 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

client

KEO International Consultants

AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ

t: +44(0)161 236 6263


f: +44(0)161 236 6484

w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com

twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

drawing title

Obstructed views due to


advertising hoarding

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT


161519 1 : 500 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev

Information P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-ZZ-DR-A-72102
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]

NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site

Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work


commences

This drawing shall not be scaled to ascertain any dimensions, work to


figured dimensions only

This drawing shall not be reproduced without express written


permission from AFL Architects Ltd.

DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.

SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.

AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.

Departments Key:

Ceremonies
Players dressing rooms
Hospitality
Lounges

62.319 m Media
Back of Bowl_S-N Services
Spectators concourse
Spectators ancillary
VVIP
49.121 m
Back of Bowl_E-W
44.121 m
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3
39.121 m
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
34.122 m
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
29.121 m
Level 4 - PLANT
24.121 m
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP
19.121 m
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY

13.121 m
Level 1 - CONCOURSE LOWER

6.000 m
Level 0 - Pitch

N-S Section P 5 12.08.16 TZ Stage 4 Issue


P 4 10.08.16 MK 4th Issue of draft plans
P 3 01.08.16 MK Levels amended to reflect site levels
P 2 25.07.16 MK 2nd Issue of draft plans
P 1 20.07.16 MK 1st Issue of draft plans

rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project

Lusail Stadium
location

Qatar, Doha
Employer

62.319 m
Back of Bowl_S-N

client
49.121 m
Back of Bowl_E-W
KEO International Consultants
44.121 m
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3
39.121 m
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
34.122 m
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
29.121 m
Level 4 - PLANT AFL Architects
24.121 m 1st Floor
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP St Georges House
56 Peter Street
19.121 m Manchester UK
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY M2 3NQ

13.121 m t: +44(0)161 236 6263


Level 1 - CONCOURSE LOWER f: +44(0)161 236 6484

6.000 m w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
Level 0 - Pitch
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan

E-W Section

drawing title

Sections

AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn HT checked MR


161519 As rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose indicated status rev

STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.

161519-AFL- 00-XX-DR-A-20301
(S) Stadium 2021 2022 2023
(P) Precint Base build Tournament Legacy
Stadium Precinct
Nº Space Notes
Temporary / Permanent
Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Area Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Min. Area m2 Required Min. Area m2 SC Requirement Area m2 Scheme
when SC uplift m2 Scheme Area m2
Area m2

1.00 Stadium

1.01 Access Control P/S


Total 0 0 0 1052 0 113
1.02 Spectator Areas S
Total 75637 0 91563 4250 0 300
1.03 Playing Area S
Total 10923 0 11083 0 0 0
1.04 Dressing Room (Changing Rooms) S
Total 785 0 1788 0 0 0
1.05 Medical Facilities S
Total 69 0 332 0 0 0
1.06 Doping Control S
Total 38 0 61 0 0 0
1.07 FIFA Offices P/S
Total 914 0 947 0 0 1808
1.08 LOC Offices S
Total 593 0 970 25 0 80
1.09 Ceremonies P/S
Total 131 0 569 2296 0 1821
1.10 Merchandise Shops P
Total 0 0 0 628 0 1500
1.11 Service Compounds S
Total 1554 0 6566 2500 0 36860
1.12 Stadium Signage P/S
Total 147 0 0 150 0 150
1.13 Hospitality Areas – Stadium S
Total 17892 0 29951 0 0 0
Hospitality Areas – Stadium S
Total 4693 0 12339 0 0 0
1.14 Hospitality Areas – Stadium Precinct P
Total 0 0 0 85000 0 101662
1.15 Media Interview Areas S
Total 1415 0 1259 0 0 0
1.16 Press Conference Room S
Total 525 0 512 0 0 0
1.17 Media Areas–Tribune S
Total 3158 0 2145 0 0 0
1.18 Stadium Media Centre P
Total 0 0 1047 7000 0 743
1.19 FIFA New Media Areas P/S
Total 504 0 0 55 0 20
1.20 Broadcast Compounds P
Total 0 0 0 6300 0 7440
1.21 Broadcast Areas S
Total 145 0 561 0 0 0
1.22 Camera Positions S
Total 313 0 180 0 0 0
1.23 International Broadcast Centre (IBC) P
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.24 IT Technical Areas P
Total 0 0 81 1120 0 0
1.25 Acreditation Centre P
Total 0 0 0 1200 0 0
1.26 Stadium Ticketing Centre (STC) P
Total 0 0 0 492 0 702
1.27 Volunteer Centre P
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1397
1.28 Flagpoles P/S
Total 0 0 46 0 0 20
1.29 Transport Areas (drop off) P
(S) Stadium 2021 2022 2023
(P) Precint Base build Tournament Legacy
Stadium Precinct
Nº Space Notes
Temporary / Permanent
Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Area Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Min. Area m2 Required Min. Area m2 SC Requirement Area m2 Scheme
when SC uplift m2 Scheme Area m2
Area m2

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.30 Parking Facilities P
Total 3490 0 0 149765 0 22955
1.31 Security Services P/S
Total 3691 0 25148 9120 0 32
Auxiliary venues
Non FIFA Department Rooms S
Total 58434 0 125255 0 0 0

Total 185052 0 312403 270953 0 177603

Overlay (additional areas)

32.01 FIFA Fan Fests P


32.02 Public viewing areas P
32.03 Public Cooled and shaded walkways P
32.40 Main ticketing centre P
32.50 Venue ticketing centres P
32.60 LOC central logistics warehouse P

Total
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

1 Access Control Points

1.01 Vehicle search areas TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th P P TBD 8.1.3 Must allow for efficient security clearance during arrival times.

Precinct (Media, GA's South and


1.02 Mag and bag areas TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th IP IP TBD 8.1.7
West, Hospitality and VIP)

Mag and bag areas 41 8.1.7 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0148

1.03 Turnstiles–General Spectators 146 N/A 3m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP IP P 438 All spectators to pass through security/turnstiles.

1.03 Turnstiles–Hospitality Spectators 146 N/A 4m2 FIFA 5th / BP IP P 583

1.03 Turnstiles–Suite/VIP/VVIP Spectators 4 N/A 6m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP IP P 23 All spectators to pass through security/turnstiles. 1 turnstile per 400 guests. Separate entrances/turnstiles should be provided for each tier.
Spectator Plaza, close to Inner
1.04 Ticket clearing points 2 2 4 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th IP P 8 72 5.4.2 not specified Important to note that these are ticketing clearing points (help desks) as opposed to a ticketing office. Adjacent to main stadium entrance.
Perimeter (Precinct)
1.05 Staff entry points TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th IP P TBD not specified Adjacent to spectator turnstiles and mag & bags

Total 0 0 1052 113

2 Spectator Areas

2.01 Commercial display–commercial affiliates, FIFA and host city 15-20 TBD 4000-5500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th IP 4000 Located on main spectator access routes from security screening area to stadium entrances.

2.02 ATM (public) 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th IP TBD not specified not specified

ATM (SMC) Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

2.03 Total_F&B Concession Stands 4708


1.2mx6m plus 3x6 store/beer
Food & beverage concessions Lower Concourse 98 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 01 706 see detailed One point of sale per 250 spectators (1m to 1.5m linear counter space).
cellar per unit
1.2mx6m plus 3x6 store/beer
Food & beverage concessions Upper Concoure 1 130 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 05 936 see detailed One point of sale per 250 spectators (1m to 1.5m linear counter space).
cellar per unit
1.2mx6m plus 3x6 store/beer
Food & beverage concessions Upper Concoure 2 58 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 06 418 see detailed One point of sale per 250 spectators (1m to 1.5m linear counter space).
cellar per unit
1.2mx6m plus 3x6 store/beer
Food & beverage concessions Upper Concoure 3 36 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 07 259 see detailed One point of sale per 250 spectators (1m to 1.5m linear counter space).
cellar per unit
800x500 space factor aprox 1.8
2.04 Spectator Seating 80212 Minimum seat spacing of 500mm for general spectators.
seats per/m2
800x500 space factor aprox 1.8
Spectator Seating Lower Tier 24480 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB LT 13600 16003 see detailed
seats per/m2
800x500 space factor aprox 1.8
Spectator Seating Upper Tier front (full ring) 32325 SB UT 17958 28206
seats per/m2
800x500 space factor aprox 1.8
Spectator Seating Upper Tier middle (E&W) 14490 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB UT 8050 inc. see detailed
seats per/m2
800x500 space factor aprox 1.8
Spectator Seating Upper Tier rear (E&W) 8917 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB UT 4954 inc. see detailed
seats per/m2
Seating positions at all levels of seating and in all categories. Each position to have an adjacent companion seat. In Tournament Mode the Stadium is required to have 0.5% of
Wheelchair Accessible Seating Positions
the total number of seats available as wheelchair positions
0.5% GA capacity (80% this tier)
Wheelchair Accessible Seating Lower Tier 322 5mx1.4m plus a further 0.9m to FIFA 5th FIFA SB LT 1110 see detailed
rear
0.5% GA capacity (20% this tier)
Wheelchair Accessible Seating Upper Tier front 80 5mx1.4m plus a further 0.9m to FIFA 5th FIFA SB UT 55 see detailed
rear
Wheelchair Companions FIFA 0.5% min. of total seating capacity, seating positions at all levels of seating and in all categories.

Wheelchair Companions Lower Tier 322 included in above area FIFA 5th FIFA SB LT inc. above see detailed

Wheelchair Companions Upper Tier front 80 included in above area FIFA 5th FIFA SB UT inc. above see detailed

2.05 Spectator Medical Centre 250 300

Spectator Medical Centre Lower Concourse TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP SB/IP 01 60 67 see detailed

Spectator Medical Centre Upper Concourse 1 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP SB/IP 05 60 67 see detailed

Information Kiosk 4 - 15 FIFA 5th BP S 01 60 not specified not specified

Concourse 27079

50% of GA occupancy 0.5m2


Lower Concourse 24480 FIFA 5th GG SB 01 6120 see detailed
per person
50% of GA occupancy 0.5m2
Upper Concourse 1 32325 FIFA 5th GG SB 05 8081 see detailed
per person
50% of GA occupancy 0.5m2
Upper Concourse 2 14490 FIFA 5th GG SB 06 3623 see detailed
per person
50% of GA occupancy 0.5m2
Upper Concourse 3 8917 FIFA 5th GG SB 07 2229 see detailed
per person
WC's-Male Spectators 3535

85% of 120% of GA capacity 15


WC’s–Male Spectators Lower Concourse 24970 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

375 Urinals/1000 men FIFA 5th S 01 494 see detailed

150 6 sinks/1000 men FIFA 5th S 01 231 see detailed

75 3 Cubicles/1000 men FIFA 5th S 01 193 see detailed


85% of 120% of GA capacity 15
WC’s–Male Spectators Upper Concourse 1 32971 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

495 Urinals/1000 men FIFA 5th S 05 653 see detailed

198 6 sinks/1000 men FIFA 5th S 05 305 see detailed

99 3 Cubicles/1000 men FIFA 5th S 05 254 see detailed

85% of 120% of GA capacity 15


WC’s–Male Spectators Upper Concourse 2 14780 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

222 Urinals/1000 men FIFA 5th S 06 293 see detailed

89 6 sinks/1000 men FIFA 5th S 06 137 see detailed

44 3 Cubicles/1000 men FIFA 5th S 06 114 see detailed


85% of 120% of GA capacity 15
WC’s–Male Spectators Upper Concourse 3 9095 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

136 Urinals/1000 men FIFA 5th S 07 180 see detailed

55 6 sinks/1000 men FIFA 5th S 07 84 see detailed

27 3 Cubicles/1000 men FIFA 5th S 07 70 see detailed

WC's-Female Spectators 3395

WC’s–Female spectators Lower Concourse 10282 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

144 14 sinks/1000 women FIFA 5th S 01 222 see detailed


FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

288 28 cubicles/1000 women FIFA 5th S 01 740 see detailed

WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 1 13576 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

190 14 sinks/1000 women FIFA 5th S 05 293 see detailed

380 28 cubicles/1000 women FIFA 5th S 05 977 see detailed

WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 2 6086 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

85 14 sinks/1000 women FIFA 5th S 06 131 see detailed

170 28 cubicles/1000 women FIFA 5th S 06 438 see detailed

WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 3 3745 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th

52 14 sinks/1000 women FIFA 5th S 07 81 see detailed

105 28 cubicles/1000 women FIFA 5th S 07 270 see detailed

Temporary toilets (outside of the external perimeter) OP 9.204

WC’s–Wheelchair Accessible 164

1/10 GA wheelchair spaces


WC’s–Wheelchair Accessible Lower Concourse 36 FIFA 5th BP S 01 119
1.5m x 2.2m
1/10 GA wheelchair spaces
WC’s–Wheelchair Accessible Upper Concourse 4 FIFA 5th BP S 05 13
1.5m x 2.2m
Spectator Prayer Rooms-Male 886

Spectator Prayer Rooms–Male Lower Concourse 163 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 01 163 see detailed

Spectator Prayer Rooms–Male Upper Concourse 372 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 05 372 see detailed

Spectator Prayer Rooms-Female 542

Spectator Prayer Rooms–Female Lower Concourse 163 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 01 163 see detailed

Spectator Prayer Rooms–Female Upper Concourse 372 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 05 372 see detailed

Ablution Area n/a n/a 677 see detailed

”Lost Persons” report room n/a n/a 48 9.3 see detailed

Lost Persons Room n/a n/a 140 see detailed

Spectator Circulation n/a n/a 6046 see detailed

Total 75637 91563 4250 300

3 Playing Area

3.01 Pitch 1 25 125X85 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 10625 10429 1.1.1 SB-001 This is the area where the match is played, includes area behind the goals and touchlines.

3.02 Players’ tunnel 1 90 4-6m width min 15m length FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 60 26 1.1.2 SB-002 An extendable tunnel protector is required from the mouth of the players’ tunnel beyond the first row of spectator seats – width to accommodate six people abreast.

3.03 Substitutes's bench 2 23 23 seats x 1m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 46 0 see detailed These are seats for the substitutes in designated positions next to the pitch adjacent to the main stand.

Medical staff benches n/a n/a FOP 0 see detailed

Team benches n/a n/a FOP not specified 1.1.3 not specified

3.04 Fourth official’s bench 1 4 4 seats x 1m FIFA 5t FIFA 5th FOP FOP 4 0 see detailed Same design as substitute benches. Provides seating for one match official and three event coordinators.

3.05 Players’ outdoor warm-up areas 2 14 3x30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 180 180 see detailed This is the area where the substitute players warm-up during the match.

This is the location from which stadium infomation operations are controlled and requires power and data points. Incorporate noise reduction elements in the design.
3.06 Infotainment desk 1 4 8x1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 8 not specified not specified
Alternative location could be in the main stand within the CCR located adjacent to rhe Stadium Operations Centre.

3.07 Photographers’ positions 4 150-250 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Include media chairs behind goals. Domestic power to be supplied according to FIFA requirements. Internet access required.

3.08 Pitch to spectator seat – goal side TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Min. 10m. In addition refer to 3.10

3.09 Pitch to spectator seat – touchlines TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Min 8.5m. In addition refer to 3.10

3.10 Pitch protection TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Can be in the form of pitch protection barriers and / or security personnel.

3.11 Advertising boards – pitch perimeter TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th &SC FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Requires access to dedicated power supply with synchronised back-up supply for LED advertising boards. LED advertising boards measure between 0.90m-1.00m in height.

3.12 Advertising boards – blind side TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Can be attached to fencing or stadium bowl pitch perimeter. Blind side boards on main touchline measure 14 units of 4m wide by 0.7m in height.

3.13 Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access 2 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD 448 see detailed Four tunnels in the stadium corners are ideal to support pitch ventilation. Tunnel height to accommmodate service vehicles (min 5m).

3.14 Video screens / boards 2 - TBD FIFA 5th /SC FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified FIFA Competitions provides guidelines with respect to what content is captured on video boards. Video boards to incorporate both a scoreboard and clock.

May include FIFA, fair play, confederations, national, United Nations and IOC flags. Flag dimensions must be proportional with the stadium bowl. Positioning the flags must take
3.15 Interior stadium bowl flags TBD - TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified
into consideration the stadium floodlights in order for the flags to be visible from all areas (pitch/VVIP/VIP).

The floodlights are for the illumination of the field of play, with yielding of shadowless environment and in accordance with requirements by FIFA TV. Uninterrupted power
3.16 Floodlights TBD - TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified
supporting continual lighting lux to be supplied.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

3.17 Contingency pitch TBD - Min. 105m x 68m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th off site FOP TBD not specified not specified Contingency pitch for the stadium if required. To include necessary equipment and manpower to install pitch when required.

Total 10923 11083

4 Dressing Room (Changing Rooms)

4.01 Dressing room - Team A 1 23 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 81 1.2.1.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0064

Dressing room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 81 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0070

4.02 Showers and toilet facilities - Team A 1 11 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 44 1.2.1.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0067

Disable Toilet - Team A (Additional) BP BP S 4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0250

Disable Toilet - Team A (Additional) BP BP S 4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0251

Disable Toilet - Team A (Additional) BP BP S 4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0252

Disable Toilet - Team A (Additional) BP BP S 4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0253

4.03 Massage room - Team A 1 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 47 1.2.1.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0065

Massage room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 46 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0071

4.04 Kit manager’s room - Team A 1 3 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 25 1.2.1.6 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0063

Kit manager’s room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 26 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0069

4.05 Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A 1 4 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 31 1.2.1.4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0066

Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 31 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0072

Technical Office - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 23 1.2.1.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0086

Technical Office - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 23 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0088

4.06 Refreshment / utility area - Team A 1 TBD 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 15 1.2.1.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0133

Refreshment / utility area - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 15 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0134

Indoor warm-up areas are a benefit for stadiums hosting doubleheader matches as part of their legacy operations and provide an alternative warm-up area during inclement
4.07 Players’ Indoor Warm-up area - Team A 1 23 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 107 1.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0068
weather.
Used for players and team officials working close to the pitch. Stretcher access from the medical room to parking area for ambulances required. Refer to section 30, “Parking
Players’ Prayer Room - Team A n/a n/a S 57 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0087
facilities”.

4.08 Dressing room - Team B 1 23 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 82 1.2.3.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0052 This is the main dressing room for Team B and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.

Dressing room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 82 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0059

4.09 Showers & toilet facilities - Team B 1 11 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 43 1.2.3.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0055

Showers & toilet facilities - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 43 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0062 Minimum eleven shower heads. Towel hooks to be placed in an area next to showers for players to dry off. To include toilets, urinals and sinks with mirrors.

4.10 Massage room - Team B 1 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 47 1.2.3.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0053

Massage room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 47 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0060 The space would include 3 massage tables, utility table and ice machine.

4.11 Kit manager’s room - Team B 1 3 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 25 1.2.3.6 not specified

This is a small office for the kit manager to store and distribute kit for players. A table, two chairs and a lockable cupboard are required. Access/egress to this area must be
Kit manager’s room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 not specified
accessible for large equipment.

4.12 Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team B 1 4 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 31 1.2.3.4 not specified Provide four lockers, chairs, table, one toilet and one shower.

Technical Office - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 1.2.3.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0089

Technical Office - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0090

4.13 Refreshment / utility area - Team B 1 TBD 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 15 1.2.3.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0135

Space should be made available for a refrigerator and tables so that beverages, food or other items can be laid out for easy access by players and staff. The space could be in
Refreshment / utility area - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 15 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0136
the open hallway area within team area or in dressing room itself.

Indoor warm-up areas are a benefit for stadiums hosting doubleheader matches as part of their legacy operations and provide an alternative warm-up area during inclement
4.14 Players’ Indoor Warm-up area - Team B 1 23 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 106 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0056
weather.

4.15 Referees’ 1–Dressing Room 1 5-7 24-35 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 24 44 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0079 Provide seven lockers, massage table, desk and chairs.

4.16 Referees’ 2–Dressing Room 1 2 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 inc. in dressing room FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0079 Provide two lockers, massage table, desk and chairs.
inc. in dressing
4.17 Referees’ Showers 1 1 3 3X1,5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 5 inc. in dressing room Provide three showers (with towel hooks) and one toilet. Could also be used to accommodate female referees.
room
inc. in dressing
4.18 Referees’ Showers 2 1 2 2X1,5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 3 374 inc. in dressing room Provide one shower (with towel hooks) and one toilet. Could also be used to accommodate female referees.
room
Players’ Prayer Room - Team B n/a n/a S 56 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0057
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Dressing Room Circulation Area n/a n/a S 393 409 see detailed

Total net room area 748

Circulation 00 37

Total 785 1788

5 Medical Facilities

5.01 Stretcher-bearers’ and medical team area 2 3-4 8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 nonexixtent nonexixtent This is the position for medical personnel on the field, 5-8m from the touchline.

5.02 Players’ medical room 1 4 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 60 8.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0082

5.03 Medical officer’s room 1 2 inc. in 5.02 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S inc. in 5.02 nonexistent nonexistent

Other medical facilities n/a n/a 272

Total net room area 66

Circulation 00 3

Total 69 332

6 Doping Control

This is the area where players wait to be tested. The doping control room is connected to the waiting room and medical office. Must contain refrigerator with unopened drinks
6.01 Total_Waiting room 1 8 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 55 see detailed
in plastic bottles, TV and waste bin.

Must be well ventilated, brightly lit with easily washable and non-slippery floors. Must contain two desks with four chairs, one lockable cabinet, two waste bins, wash basin and
6.02 Medical office 1 4 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 nonexistent nonexistent
a mirror.

Toilets must be linked to the medical office and large enough for for two people. Must be well ventilated, brightly lit with easily washable and non-slippery floors. Must
6.03 Toilet 1 2 4 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 4 6 8.2.1.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0138
conatina toilet, wash basin, mirror, shower and waste bin.

Total 36

Circulation 00 2

Total 38 61

7 FIFA Offices

7.01 General coordinator’s (GC) office 1 2-3 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 42 5.1.19 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0095 This is the office for the FIFA representatives managing match day operations.

7.02 GC meeting room (crisis management) 1 10 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 51 5.1.20 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 not specified

7.03 GC storage room 1 n/a 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 21 5.1.21 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0096 Lockable and secure location required.

Match coordination room required for match day minus one meeting team representatives. Ideally, the room should have a pleasant ambience for meeting team
7.04 Match coordination meeting room 1 40 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 100 5.1.22 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0037
representatives.

7.05 Match commissioner office 1 1 60 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 60 nonexistent nonexistent May include areas listed in 7.6-7.10.

7.06 Head of delegation’s office 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent

7.07 Technical Study Group office 1 2-3 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent

7.08 Referees Committee member’s office 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent

7.09 Referees’ assessor 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent

7.10 Referees’ video specialist office 1 2 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent

7.11 Security office 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 22 5.1.27 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0076 Ideally located near or with LOC security office.

Room ideally adjacent to the stadium bowl but within the perimeter of the stadium for players' escorts, flag-bearers and ball kids. Should be an open area for meals and
7.12 Youth programme room 1 100 300 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 300 nonexistent 7.1.3 nonexistent
recreation and ideally have an outdoor playing area. Changing rooms and toilets for both boys and girls are essential.

7.13 Ball kids holding room and toilets 1 TBD 30-40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 33 5.1.14 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0246 Required area with toilet for ball kids during the half-time break only. Does not need to be in the stadium technical zone but must have easy access to and from the pitch.

7.14 Mascot dressing room 1 3-4 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 10 21 5.1.10 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0075 Access to toilets

7.15 Marketing office 1 4-5 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 45 5.1.25 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 Typically used on match days and / or when the general coordinator will be working from the stadium. Lockable cabinet required.

7.16 Rights protection programme (RPP) office 1 1-2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 nonexistent nonexistent The RPP office in the stadium is generally used on match days.

7.17 RPP meeting room 1 8-10 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 nonexistent nonexistent Can be a shared space and used for other meetings when not required. The RPP manager will use this room to meet with authorities on match days.

7.18 RPP storage room 1 n/a 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 nonexistent nonexistent Storage for counterfeit and illegal products seized at the stadium.

7.19 Coca-Cola logistics office 1 2 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent This office is for the Coca-Cola staff to manage deliveries and quantities of VIK and product for concessions. May be located within the back-of-house compound.

7.20 Cash-handling office 1 2 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 30 25 5.1.4 Logistics Compound (Precicnt) not specified Area required for a safe where merchandise and F&B outlets can deposit excess cash. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.

7.21 Storage for credit card payment devices 1 2 3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 3 not specified 5.1.5 not specified Used for general storage and repair of credit card payment devices used at F&B and merchandise Concessions.

7.22 LED advertising boards operator position 1 2 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 15 nonexistent nonexistent Required for the operation of the advertising boards. Must be airconditioned dur to computer equipment used int his room. Also used for meetings.

7.23 Merchandise concessionaire office 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 20 20 5.1.7 Logistics Compound (Precicnt) not specified Office location for merchandise concessionaire, for general operations. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.

7.24 F&B concessionaire office 1 3-4 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 40 not specified Office location for F&B concessionaire, for general operations. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.

F&B Staff room P P 200 7.3.3 Logistics Compound (Precinct)

F&B Staff room P P 540 7.3.3 Logistics Compound (Precinct)

In the event LED boards or rational boards are installed at the stadium, a location for two containers is required in proximity to the stadium in addition to a storage location
7.25 Signage / advertising boards storage 1 n/a 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 nonexistent nonexistent
near the pitch. Access to power required. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.

7.26 Media hot desk 1 1 Est. FIFA 5th S 00 10 nonexistent nonexistent

7.27 Hospitality office 1 2-4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 25 5.1.11 FFL Plaza PL PL-0233

7.28 Hospitality rights holder office 1 2-4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 26 5.1.26 FFL Hospitality Club 01-0074 Adjacent to hospitality areas.

7.29 Protocol office 1 4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 41 5.1.1 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0033 Ideally located near or with LOC protocol office.

7.30 IT stadium infrastructure support 1 5 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 nonexistent nonexistent Within the stadium bowl but outside the competition areas and VIP/VVIP facilities.

7.31 Central results system 1 TBD 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 nonexistent nonexistent

7.32 IT command centre (ITCC) 1 60 650 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 650 nonexistent nonexistent Located within the IBC for the FWC and FIFA HQ or broadcast areas during the FCC.

7.33 IT liaison 1 1 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 10 13 5.1.13 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0028
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Total_Other FIFA Offices 507 1023 see detailed

Total net room area 870

Circulation 00 44
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Total 914 947 1808

8 LOC Offices

8.01 Venue manager office 1 1 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 43 5.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0091

8.02 Venue manager assistant 1 1-2 incl. 8.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 8.01 incl. 8.01

8.03 Site manager 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent This is an area where the site manager coordinates the installation ans maintenace of temporary structures along with the service providers. See section 11.

8.04 Working rooms / hot desk 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent Assigned to staff not permanently allocated to specific stadium or staff not previously accounted for.

8.05 IT office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 15 not specified Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.

8.06 Signage office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 150 not specified Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.

8.07 Infotainment office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.08 Logistics office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.09 Transport office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent 5.2.6 nonexistent

8.10 Marketing office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 50 5.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0025

8.11 Medical office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.12 Drivers’ room 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 50 5.2.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0025

8.13 Security office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent 5.2.8 nonexistent

8.14 Hospitality office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.15 Protocol office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 44 5.2.9 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0034

8.16 Catering (F&B) office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.17 Volunteer office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P p 25 80 5.2.7 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.

8.18 General office TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 159 5.2.4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0029

8.19 Media hot desk 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent

8.20 Ceremonies office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent Office opening match, final and third-place match venues only.

8.21 Stadium management offices TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 24 B3-0004 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.

8.22 Stadium facilities management offices TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 24 5.2.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0004 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.

8.23 Stadum grounds keeper facilities TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 351 B3-0001 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.

8.24 Other TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 60 see detailed

Toal net room area 565

Circulation 00 28

Total 593 970 25 80

9 Ceremonies

Opening & closing ceremonies


9.01 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 1000 1021
changing rooms (green room)

Opening / closing ceremonies


9.02 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P TBD TBD 1.3.3 Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) Away from public routes and close to player / service tunnels.
prop store

Opening / closing ceremonies Area required for opening / closing ceremony rehearsals F&B requirements, holding areas, toilets and sanitary facilities and transport requirements etc. Size of the location
9.03 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 496 1296 800 see detailed
additional facilities_Total dependent on the ceremonies programme. In the Tender Scheme these areas include the production team office, the set up area and the storage space.

Award ceremonies hostesses’


Required for the third-place and final matches only. Changing rooms to include spaces for the award ceremony hostesses. Restricted access to the players’ tunnel and dressing
9.04 changing room – final & 1 16-20 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 73 1.3.7 Basement level_TBC B3 B3-0187
rooms.
third-place matches
Awards ceremonies staging
Holding area to cater for VVIPs, hostesses, protocol and security staff, with access to awards podium and the main stand. Located in route from the VVIP lounge to the awards
9.05 area – final & third-place TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP/SB FOP not specified not specified
podium.
match
Awards ceremonies podium –
9.06 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP/SB FOP not specified 1.3.8 not specified Podium to be situated in the main stand for the final and on the field of play for the third-place match. Access to and from the field of play and the VVIP holding areas required.
final & third-place match
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee
Awards ceremonies medal
9.07 preparation & holding room – TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 Required for third-place and final matches only.
final & third-place matches
Total net room area 125

Circulation 00 6

Total 131 569 2296 1821

10 Merchandise Shops

Temporary kiosks may be required, depending on stadium capacity and existing structures situated at the stadium. Minimum of 8-25 kiosks required of various sizes. Power to
10.01 Official merchandise shops / kiosks_Total 8-25 TBD 16-250 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 128 0
be supplied by the stadium to all outlets and surrounding area, must be well lit.
Ideally secure space inside the stadium of minimum 500m² is available. If space or limited space is not available within the stadium, a space for 6 -12 sea containers (dependent
10.02 Merchandise storage_Total TBD TBD 500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 500 1500
on stadium capacity) is required.

Total 0 0 628 1500

11 Service Compounds

The location of the compound is to support various operations and the storage of goods, i.e. F&B, IT&T, merchandise, logistics, site management, waste management etc. The
layout of the compound(s) should include demacration of areas with security fencing (2 metres high), dry and cold storage containers and dedicated access gates with sufficient
11.01 Back-of-house compound TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 1480 6566 see detailed area for simulateous large delivery vehicles and forklifts. Area should be clear of internal spectator traffic and venue dressing applied to fence lines to conceal the operation.
The compound must have proper ground preparation, drainage, lighting and services. As this area will be erected prior to/during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence
is required pre-, post- and during operations. Power distribution may be required for refrigerated containers.

Ideally, 150% of stadium capacity inventory to be stored in existing facilities. The remaining inventory will be stored in containers within the stadium perimeter (back of house).
11.02 F&B dry/cold storage TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed
It is important that this compound is as close to the stadium as possible. Power to be supplied by stadium.

This is a space in the stadium precinct for temporary storage, where sufficient storage is not available in the stadium. Can be used for merchandise storage. Minimum height
11.03 Merchandise compound TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 not specified
clearance of 4.8m to be considered.

11.04 Waste removal / recycling TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed

11.05 Logistics compound / office TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S/P incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 33860 see detailed

11.06 Site management compound TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed

11.07 Back-up generators TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP P 2500 3000 B2-0008 Located in Precint in Tender Scheme.

Central Production Kitchen BP BP S incl. 11.01

Total net room area 1480

Circulation 00 74

Total 1554 6566 2500 36860

12 Stadium Signage and Décor

12.01 Stadium signage and decor office 2 TBD 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 not specified not specified
Stadium signage and decor storage / workroom
12.02 1 TBD 150 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 150 150 7.1.7 Logistics compound (Precinct) not specified Requires power and must be suitable for working conditions. Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.

12.03 Signage storage 1 TBD 100-150 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 not specified not specified Area separate from advertising boards signage.

Total net room area 140

Circulation 00 7

Total 147 0 150 150

13 Hospitality Areas – Stadium

Unless otherwise agreed by FIFA in writing, for the FIFA World Cup™, each stadium
13.01 Total Skyboxes/Suites & Hospitality Lounges 7120 8% of Stadium Gross Capacity FIFA 5th FIFA % requirement S should have the following: eight per cent (8%) of total number of seats (i.e. all seats including the seat kills, media tribune and VIP tribune) for opening match, semi finals and
final.

30% of hospitality provision


Skyboxes must represent a minimum of 30% of the hospitality programme.Final number of suites and skyboxes to be confirmed by designer, all to have unobstructed view of FOP.
Skyboxes & Suites TBD 2136 (FIFA)/ BP & SC S 03 4272 4272 4029 see detailed
The Tender Scheme includes 2803 seats in the Skyboxes.
2m2/person (BP)

600mm seat width x 900mm


Best practice 900mm deep rows.
Skybox seating area row depth. Seat factor 1.4 FIFA 5th BP SB MT 1526 1643 2197 see detailed
SC states 1000mm rows.
seats/m2

70% of hospitality provision These do not require a view of the FOP.


Hospitality lounges 4984 (FIFA)/ FIFA 5th BP S 02 4984 7974 3434 see detailed The Tender Scheme includes 5436 Hospitality seats.
1m2/person SC requires 1.6m2/person

550mm seat width x 800mm


Hospitality seating Area FIFA 5th BP & SC SB LT 2932 2932 3383 see detailed
seat depth
1% of Hospitality Capacity
Hospitality Wheelchair seating Area 71 1.5mx1.4m plus a further 0.9m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB LT 246 0 see detailed
to rear

Hospitality Entrance Lobbies FIFA 5th BP 01 500 14851 see detailed

13.02 Skybox satelite kitchens 1 TBD 10% total Skybox space FIFA 5th BP S 03 427 6.1.8 see detailed

Lounge kitchens 1 TBD 30% lounge space FIFA 5th BP S 02 1495 6.1.8 see detailed
50% of capacity
Hospitality Skyboxes Toilets Male 3560 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 464 see detailed

71 1 Urinal/50 men FIFA 5th S 03 94

45 1 sink/80 men FIFA 5th S 03 69

30 1 Cubicle/120 men FIFA 5th S 03 76

50% of capacity
Hospitality Skyboxes Toilets Female 3560 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 450 see detailed

45 1 sink/50 women FIFA 5th S 03 69

30 1 cubicle/35 women FIFA 5th S 03 76

1/10 GA wheelchair spaces


Hospitality Sky Boxes Toilets Accesible 1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 3 88 see detailed
1.5m x 2.2m
50% of capacity
Hospitality Lounges Toilets Male 2492 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 26 see detailed

50 1 Urinal/50 men FIFA 5th S 02 66

31 1 sink/80 men FIFA 5th S 02 48


FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

21 1 Cubicle/120 men FIFA 5th S 02 53

50% of capacity
Hospitality Lounges Toilets Female 2492 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 23 see detailed

31 1 sink/50 women FIFA 5th S 02 48

21 1 cubicle/35 women FIFA 5th S 02 53

1/10 GA wheelchair spaces


Hospitality Lounges Toilets Accesible 1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 3 4 see detailed
1.5m x 2.2m
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Total_Other Areas n/a n/a 1002 see detailed

Total net room area 17040

Circulation 852

01 37

02 482

03 333

Total 17892 29951

13 Hospitality VIP/VVIP Areas – Stadium

13.03 VIP lounge - opening and final 1 1350 1350 x 1 FIFA FIFA 5th S 02 1350 1939 4.2.4 FFL VIP Lounge VP PL-0027

13.04 VIP lounge - semi-final n/a 1940 FFL Plaza PL PL-0027

13.05 VIP lounge - quarter-final n/a 875 FFL VIP Lounge VP VP-0002

13.07 VVIP lounge - opening and final 1 150 150 x 1.8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 270 769 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0001 Dedicated walkways, entrances, lifts and stairwells required for VVIPs and VIPs.

Provide high-quality sofas and armchairs, clean broadcast feed


13.11 FIFA President’s lounge 1 6 6X2.5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 15 21 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0027
required by IT and unobstructed view of the pitch preferred. Adjacent to VVIP lounge.

LOC President’s (Chairman’s) Provide high-quality sofas and armchairs, clean broadcast feed
13.12 1 6 6X2.5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 15 21 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0028
lounge required by IT and unobstructed view of the pitch preferred. Adjacent to FIFA President’s lounge.

13.13 Bodyguards / security personnel - opening match and final 1 100 100x1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 100 41 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0148 Clean broadcast feed required by IT. To be taken in consideration with 8.15. As close to VIP areas.

13.15 VVIP/VIP interview position 2 4 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 24 5 2.1.10 FFL Lower Plaza West PL PL-0028 Might be included in the VIP lounge.

13.16 VVIP/VIP medical room(s) 1 to 2 4 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 20 44 not specified

13.17 VIP Kitchen(s) 1 TBD 30% Lounge FIFA 5th BP S 02 405 646 not specified

13.17 VVIP Kitchen 1 TBD 30% Lounge FIFA 5th BP S 03 90 102 not specified

13.18 VIP welcome desk - opening match and final 1 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 42 FFL Plaza PL PL-0230 Fixed position throughout the tournament with access to power. Electronic access control system utilised in this area to validate tickets.

13.21 VVIP welcome desk 1 10 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 22 FFL Plaza PL PL-0229 Fixed position throughout the tournament with access to power. Electronic access control system utilised in this area to validate tickets.

600mm seat width x 800mm


13.22 VIP Tribune 1 1350 FIFA 5th BP SB LT 1460 1562 not specified The Tender Scheme includes 1700 seats + 2 wheelchair spaces + 6 easy access seats. See 13.03-13.06.
seat depth
650mm seat width x 900mm
13.23 VVIP Tribune 1 150 FIFA 5th BP SB MT 630 633 not specified The Tender Scheme includes 300 seats + 2 wheelchair spaces + 2 easy access seat. See 13.03-13.06.
seat depth
50% of capacity
VVIP Toilets Male 75 FIFA 5th BP S 03 58 see detailed

2 1 Urinal/50 men FIFA 5th BP S 03 2

1 1 sink/80 men FIFA 5th BP S 03 2 13

1 1 Cubicle/120 men FIFA 5th BP S 03 2

50% of capacity
VVIP Toilets Female 75 FIFA 5th BP S 03 60 see detailed

1 1 sink/50 women FIFA 5th BP S 03 2

1 1 cubicle/35 women FIFA 5th BP S 03 2

1/10 GA wheelchair spaces @


VVIP Toilets Accesible 1 FIFA 5th BP S 03 3
1.5m x 2.2m
50% of capacity
VIP Toilets Male 675 FIFA 5th BP S 02 129 see detailed

14 1 Urinal/50 men FIFA 5th BP S 02 18

8 1 sink/80 men FIFA 5th BP S 02 13

6 1 Cubicle/120 men FIFA 5th BP S 02 15

50% of capacity
VIP Toilets Female 675 FIFA 5th BP S 02 87 see detailed

8 1 sink/50 women FIFA 5th BP S 02 13

6 1 cubicle/35 women FIFA 5th BP S 02 15

1/10 GA wheelchair spaces @


VIP Toilets Accesible 1 FIFA 5th BP S 02 3 58 see detailed
1.5m x 2.2m

VVIP Circulation & other spaces n/a n/a S 03 2515 see detailed

VIP Circulation & other spaces n/a n/a S 02 770 see detailed

Total net room area 4470

Circulation 223

02 154

03 70

Total 4693 12339

14 Hospitality Areas – Stadium Precinct

150m-300m from centre of stadium. Requires a hard, flat well-drained surface to accommodate heavy vehicles and equipment. Use of existing halls or marquees. Provision of
bulk services to all marquees, i.e. lighting, power, water and drainage of waste/water. Security fences installed, and venue dressing applied when public areas are adjacent.
14.01 Commercial Affiliate Village - final 1 5000-7000 5-5.6m² per occupancy FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 35000 40313 6.2.1 Precinct Communications network to the areas/marquees: TV (all channels), phone and IT&T. Access to the site required a minimum of three months prior to the exclusive use period.
Pedestrian pathways from guest drop-off/parking locations to village marquee entrance to stadium and back ideally concrete, asphalt or appropriate pathways to create a level
and stable route for all guests.

150m-300m from centre of stadium. Requires a hard, flat well-drained surface to accommodate heavy vehicles and equipment. Use of existing halls or marquees. Provision of
bulk services to all marquees, i.e. lighting, power, water and drainage of waste/water. Security fences installed, and venue dressing applied when public areas are adjacent.
14.05 Commercial Hospitality - final 1 N/A 4.6m² per occupancy FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 50000 60549 Precinct Communications network to the areas/marquees: TV (all channels), phone and IT&T. Access to the site required a minimum of three months prior to the exclusive use period.
Pedestrian pathways from guest drop-off/parking locations to village marquee entrance to stadium and back ideally concrete, asphalt or appropriate pathways to create a level
and stable route for all guests.

Other Hospitality Spaces n/a n/a 800

Total 85000 101662

15 Media Interview Areas

15.01 Multilateral flash interview 2 4 6 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 12 2.1.4 Location near tunnel entrance to be identified at all venues and cable pathways to be identified. Technical and domestic power provided in this area.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

15.02 Unilateral flash interview 6 4 6 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 36 36 2.1.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0078 Cable pathways to be identified. Technical and domestic power provided in this area.

15.0315.05 Presentation studios 8 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB 03 320 307 see detailed

15.06 TV/ Interview Studios 4 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 160 199 see detailed

15.07 Pre-Mixed zone 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 40 37 not specified

15.08 Mixed zone 1 250-300 600 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 600 645 3.1.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0084 Location between dressing rooms and players’ coaches to be identified. Size and layout to be jointly determined with Media and TV.

15.09 Coach on Arrival Interview Position 2 TBD 90 FIFA 5th BP S 00 180 35 not specified

Total net room area 1348

Circulation 00 67

Total 1415 1259

16 Press Conference Room

Close proximity to players' dressing rooms and mixed zone. Seating & standing requirements per venue to be determined (150 - 200 seats). Opening match and final venues to
16.01 Press conference room 1 150-200 500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 500 512 3.1.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0041
cater for higher attendance.

16.02 Head table 1 6 incl. 16.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01

16.03 Interpreting booths 3-4 6-8 incl. 16.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01 FIFA official languages are Spanish, French, English and German. Provide services for two teams.

16.04 Camera platform 1 TBD 2 x 10-20m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01 Location within press conference room. Platform construction may be split levels within same area, audio split of PA.
Control room / space for A/V, live streaming and remote interpretation
n/a n/a 3.1.1.2 see detailed
services
Total net room area 500

Circulation 00 25

Total 525 512

17 Media Areas–Tribune

Total area of media tribune: UT 3138

The media tribune must make provision to increase and reduce its capacity (i.e. desk positions replaced for spectator seating and vice for larger and smaller matches. The
17.01 Press positions, with desks 1000 1000 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 1276 3.1.5 SB-024 media tribune consists of positions for written press with and without desks. Desk positions include seats with desks, power, cabled internet access (all seats) and a television
monitor (one monitor per three desk seats).

Minimal technical services or power required, if any. For the FWC the following is required: group match 300; quarter-finals 400, semi-finals and third-place match 800, opening
17.02 Press positions, without desks 1000 1000 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 524 3.1.6 SB-025
match and final 1,000.

17.03 Refreshment area TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 05 20 nonexistent nonexistent

17.04 Tribune photographers 100 100 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 100 see detailed

17.05 Observer seats 375 375 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 245 see detailed

Seat allocations, by constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium. Construction of desks, seats, cable pathways and
technical power to be identified. One commentary position (which houses three people) typically takes up the space of a minimum of six (6) seats, typically seven (7) to nine (9)
seats (two sequential rows of three). Typically the design of the commentary positions is venue-specific. Group stage, round of 16 and third-place match require 110. For the
17.06 Commentary positions 160 160 1.80 x 0.60 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above inc. above
remaining matches, 120 for quarte-finals; 130 for semi-finals; 160 for opening match and final. Dimensions are 1.8m wide x 1.6m separated by Perspex. Also required are
domestic and technical power, data cables, telecoms cables, two monitors. Twenty per cent (20%) of the broadcast commentary positions at the rear of the tribune may
accommodate a commentary camera.

17.07 Cableways TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S/P TBD nonexistent nonexistent

Pitch photographers’ positions n/a n/a not dpecified 3.1.3 not dpecified

Total 3158 2145

18 Stadium Media Centre

Opening match and final to be the larger number. Area to include bulk servixes, i.e. sufficient lighting, drainage and access to power supply etc. As this area will be erected
IAAF & FIFA
18.01 Total Area of Stadium Media Centre (SMC) 1 800-2000 4000-7000 FIFA 5th OP P 7000 during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post and during operations. Pedestrian pathways to include level, drainage surface from point of
5th
transport drop-off, pick-up and parking.

18.02 Rate card service desk 1 4-8 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Space to be coordinated with LOC rate card planning.

18.03 IT office (rate card) 1 3 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Similar to the MATCH IT office.

18.04 IT storage (rate card) 1 n/a 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Storage for rate card-related assets.

18.05 Offices – SMC 1 8-12 32-48 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Final venue requires the larger amount (48).

18.06 Copy area TBD incl. 18.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.05 25 3.2.16 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

18.07 Meeting room 1-2 20-30 80-120 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 0 incl. 18.01 see detailed

18.08 Camera repair service 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 50 see detailed

18.09 Information desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 100 see detailed

Catering area for journalists for purchase of hot food. Space to include a buffet, counters, fridges, tables & chairs. Ideally, food preparation area i.e. grills, fryers, would also be
18.10 Cafeteria and lounge (catering area) 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.31 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
available.

18.11 Pigeon holes 1 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.23 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

18.12 Welcome desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01

18.13 Ticket distribution desk Media Tribune 2 2 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 50 see detailed

18.14 Host city information desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 10 3.2.24 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

18.15 Medical room 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01

18.16 Media work desks 1 500-1000 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.12 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) Final match requires the larger amount (1,000).

18.17 Total_Photographers' work desks 1 100-150 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 260 incl. 18.01 419 see detailed Final match requires the larger amount (150).

18.18 Lockers (with padlocks) 1 200-300 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.22 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) Size of lockers (trolleys for photographers). Final match requires the larger amount (300).

18.19 Press agency offices TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Press agency offices is roughly 1,000m² located within the SMC or IBC.

18.20 Vending machines TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01

18.21 Transportation desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 10 3.2.26 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

18.22 Media storage room TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 25 3.2.15 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

18.23 Office for Telecom Partner 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 25 3.2.27 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

18.24 Offices – Editors 1 5 400 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 400m² offices for the editors.

18.25 Office – FIFA media officers 1 2-4 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01

18.26 Interpreting centre 1 6-8 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Space to include eight (8) sound-proof interpreting booths, a control room and a lounge.

18.27 ATM 1 TBD FIFA 5th OP TBD Official event bank may install an ATM in each SMC.

SMC Other Areas n/a n/a OP 29

Media Concourse n/a n/a SB 787

Total net room area 0 7000 714

Circulation 0

Total 0 1047 7000 743

19 FIFA New Media Areas

19.01 FIFA.com office – opening match/final 1 120 TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 480

19.03 FIFA Media Channel 1 6-7 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 30 10 3.2.33 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

19.04 Content Management Services 1 5 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 25 10 3.2.34 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

Total net room area 480 0

Circulation 00 24

Total 504 0 55 20

20 Broadcast Compound

Provision of space, fence/gates, cable pathways into stadium, temporary buildings, storage space and technical power. Office/technical/production space within each broadcast
compound provided by the LOC. Area for mobile units and fly away units for both the host broadcaster and media rights licensees with technical requirements to broadcast the
event from the stadium.l For the opening match/semi-final/final venues, 6000m2 is required. For all remaining stadiums, 4000m2 is required. Area to include bulk services, i.e.
20.01 Broadcast compound 1 TBD 6000m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 6000 6820
sufficient lighting, drainage and access to power supply etc. As this area will be erected during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post- and during
operations, and 24-hour safety and security to be in place. Pedestrian pathways to include level, drained surface from point of vehivle drop-off, pick-up and parking. Area to be
available prior to the exclusive use period.

20.02 Satellite farm 1 TBD incl. 20.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 20.01 Ideally located in the broadcast compound but should an exception be required, this may be situated adjacent to the broadcast compound. Unobstructed view of the sky.

20.03 Host broadcaster offices / graphics house / storage 1 TBD 300-400m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 300 300 - 400m² of office and production space within or adjacent to the compound.

Broadcast Compound Other Spaces n/a n/a 620

Total 0 0 6300 7440

21 Broadcast Areas

21.01 Commentary control room (CCR) 1 20 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 88 2.1.12 FFL Lower Plaza West 3 03-0150 Location includes installation and construction, cable pathways, HVAC and both technical and domestic power to be identified.

21.02 Commentary control room – storage 1 n/a 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 28 2.1.13 FFL Lower Plaza West 3 03-0166

21.03 Announcer’s platform 4 4 8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 8 nonexistent 2.1.6 nonexistent Location requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

21.04 Rate card technical areas 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 nonexistent nonexistent Similar to secondary technical areas (STA) requirements.

21.05 Rate card support 2 2 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 nonexistent nonexistent Two seats in the media tribune.

Consists of easy-to-rig pathways for cabling for all mulitlateral and unilateral facilities, i.e. camera platforms, TV studios, presentation studios, announcer platforms. Special
21.06 Cable pathways TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 nonexistent nonexistent
cable paths in commentary are required. Detailed specifications by hot broadcaster.

The cable protection of all routes should have either temporary or permanent cable bridges or ducts installed from the broadcast compound to the various camera positions,
21.07 Cable bridges and ducts (Central Broadcast Apparatus Room) TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 72 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0005
the commentary positions, mixed zone, SMC, CCR and firld of play.

Broadcast Areas' Toilets & Circulation n/a n/a S 373

Total net room area 138

Circulation 00 7

Total 145 561

22 Camera Positions

22.01 Camera 1 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.02 Camera 2 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.03 Camera 3&4 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.04 Camera 5&6 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.05 Camera 7&8 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.06 Camera 9 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.07 Camera 10 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.08 Camera 11 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.09 Camera 12&13 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.10 Camera 14 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.11 Camera 15 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.12 Camera 16&17 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.13 Camera 18 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.14 Camera 19&20 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

22.15 Camera 21 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.16 Camera 22 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.17 Camera 23&24 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.18 Camera 25 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.19 Unilateral camera position – centre left 1 1 2.5 x 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 25 not specified Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.20 Unilateral camera position – centre right 1 1 2.5 x 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 25 not specified Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.

22.21 Unilateral camera position – goal left 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified

22.22 Unilateral camera position – goal right 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified

22.23 Unilateral camera position – field left 1 1 1 2.5 x 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 30 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.

22.24 Unilateral camera position – field left 2 1 1 2.5 x 9 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 23 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
Unilateral camera position - field right 1
22.25 1 1 2.5 x 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 30 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
Unilateral camera position - field right 2
22.26 1 1 2.5 x 9 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 23 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.

22.27 Unilateral camera position – reverse left 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified

22.28 Unilateral camera position – reverse right 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified

22.29 Spider-cam & control desk TBD 1 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB TBD not specified Placement of anchors should minimise seat kills.

22.30 3D cameras TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB TBD not specified Located alongside the main camera and on the field of play.

Other Camera Positions Spaces n/a n/a 180

Total 313 180

23 International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

Not included in the stadium n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Located outside Stadium Precinct–Not included in this brief.

Total 0 0

24 IT Technical Areas

The technology compound is the ideal approach for the delivery of the space required for stadium IT. If there is no possibility to deliver these locations in one area, then the
24.01 Technology compound 1 114 1100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 1100
locations will need to be distributed throughout the venue. Access to this area will be required in advance of the exclusive use period (6-8 weeks in advance).

Central technical areas within the stadium that will house the core technology components. Space for minimum 8 x 19" racks - 24m2; Easy access to the equipmene; Axxess to
24.02 Primary technical area (PTA) 1 1 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 wiring racks from all sides; Space for back-up power supply and sufficient climate control and protection against external elements. Area must be lockable, dust-free with a
raised floor.

Central technical areas within the stadium that will house the core technology components. Space for minimum 8 x 19" racks - 24m2; Easy access to the equipmene; Axxess to
24.03 Primary technical area (PTA) 2 1 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 wiring racks from all sides; Space for back-up power supply and sufficient climate control and protection against external elements. Area must be lockable, dust-free with a
raised floor.

This space will be used by the management team with representatives from MATCH IT, LOC IT, Telecommunications support staff (FIFA IT solution and rate card), local
24.04 IT management office 1 20 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01
operations teams (LOC).

24.05 IT meeting room 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01

This space will be used by the management team with representatives from MATCH IT, LOC IT, Telecommunications support staff (FIFA IT solution and rate card), local
24.06 IT support office 1 30 140 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01
operations teams (LOC) and the companies supporting areas of power and event radios.

24.07 IT reception and support desk 1 8 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 LOC IT and radios (including 15m² for storage).

24.08 MATCH IT storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01

24.09 LOC IT storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01

24.10 Telecommunications provider storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Inventory for FIFA IT solution and rate card.

24.11 Technical services storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Inventory for event radios and power.

24.12 Break area 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01

24.13 Generators area 1 8 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Dedicated for the provision of power in the technology compound.

24.14 Secondary technical areas (STA) TBD TBD 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 15 These are decentralised technical areas within the stadium that will house the distribution components.

24.15 Local technical areas (LTA) TBD TBD 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 5 Local space at area where IT is deployed to house local cabling and hardware (switches).

IT Technical Areas Circulation 5% of net useable BP 0

Other IT Technical Areas n/a n/a 81

Total 0 81 1120 0

25 Accreditation Centre

25.01 Accreditation centre 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 1200

25.02 Security desk 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.1 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.03 Queuing area 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.2 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.04 Welcome desk 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.3 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.05 Image capture desks 4-8 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.4 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.06 Print station 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.5 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.07 Accreditation office 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.6 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Office allocated to accreditation manager / coordinator.

25.08 General offices 3 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.7 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Offices used for accreditation staff and meeting rooms.

25.09 Lounge and refreshments 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.8 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)

25.10 IT office 1 TBD 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.9 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Office space for support and storage.

Total 0 0 1200 0

26 Stadium Ticketing Centre (STC)


FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Stadium Ticket Centre (STC) P 432 702 5.4.1 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)

26.01 Front office 1 40 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 100 5.4.1.1 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 50m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 70m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 100m2.

26.02 Queuing area 1 150 200 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 200 5.4.1.2 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 120m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 150m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 200m2.

26.03 Trouble-shooting area 1 10 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 12 5.4.1.3 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Five people at counter, five solving issues.

26.04 Back office 1 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 40 5.4.1.4 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 25m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 40m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 40m2.

26.05 Ticketing manager office 1 2 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 30 5.4.1.5 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)

26.06 Meeting rooms 2 10 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 60 5.4.1.6 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)

26.07 Secure storage 1 N/A 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 20 see detailed The area of 20m² is subdivided in two rooms. The first room is for ticket stock (4m²) the second for hardware (16m²).

26.08 Rest Area 1 10 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 30 20 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) One vending machine per STC to be located in the rest area.
Spectator Plaza, close to Inner
Ticket clearing points (see 1.04) n/a n/a IP 72 5.4.2
Perimeter (Precinct)
Total 0 0 492 702

27 Volunteer Centre

27.01 Reception Desk TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP P TBD 1397

Volunteer Centre - Welcome Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.1 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

27.02 Offices TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th inc. 27.01 P inc. 27.01 inc. 27.01 5.5.2 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

Socializing Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.3 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

Animation / Entertainment Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.4 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

Storage n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.6 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

27.03 Volunteers’ Rest Area TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th inc. 27.01 P inc. 27.01 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

Cafeteria/Kitchen area n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.5 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified

Total 0 0 0 1397

28 Flagpoles

28.01 Exterior stadium flags TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th & SC FIFA 5th & SC P TBD 20 Logistics Compound (Precinct) Exterior flags to be proposed by designer.

Protocol flags n/a n/a 46 10.5.1 FFL Lower Plaza B2 B2-0063

Total 0 46 0 20

29 Transport Areas (drop off)

29.01 Rail Stations TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent

29.02 Park and Ride TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent Facilities must cater for mobility-impaired spectators.

29.03 Spectator parking (park and wait) TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent Facilities must cater for mobility-impaired spectators.

Total 0 0 0 0

30 Parking Facilities

Drop-off and pick-up ideally underneath the main stand. If exposed to spectator missile, then overhang or canopy covering the buses should be minimum 4.8m height. Canopy
30.01 Team bus drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 2 buses 90 FIFA 5th BP S 00 180 1.2.101 not specified should extend from the buses to players' entrance into the stadium, and back to the buses from the mixed zone exit, if different location. Additional parking for police escort
vehicles to be considered in the overall parking allocation.

30.02 Team car parking 12 12 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 540 not specified Car parking for six cars per team. Additional LOC support and police escort vehicles to be considered in overall allocation.

30.03 Team equipment van 2 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 180 1.2.103 not specified

30.04 Team guests' parking 12 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 300 0 Six cars and one bus per team, situated with direct access to the relevant seating allocation within the stadium bow.

2 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S

Drop-off and pick-up ideally underneath the main stand. If exposed to spectator missile, then overhang or canopy covering vehicles should extend the match officials' entry/exit
30.05 Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 1 minibus 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 90
point of stadium. Parking located near the entrance. Additional parking for police escort vehicles to be considered in the overall allocation.

1 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25

30.06 Ambulance parking 4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 100 8.2.4 Vehicle space for four ambulances, each with a defibrillator for care of players, team officials, VVIPs / VIPs and FIFA delegation.

30.07 Doping control collection vehicle 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 8.2.5

30.08 VIP drop-off 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 not specified Dedicated walkways, entrances, lifts and stairwells required for VVIPs and VIPs.

At main entrance. Dedicated drop-off with direct access route to VVIP lounge by dedicated lift/ stairs. 80 VVIPs will be dropped off at this point and parking must be available
30.09 VVIP drop-off 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 not specified
within close proximity. Additional parking for police escort vehicles to be considered in the overall parking allocation.

30.10 VVIP cars - opening match and final 80 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 2000 not specified Next to VVIP entrance.

30.13 VIP cars - opening match and final 200 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 5000

30.15 VIP buses - opening match and final 45 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P P 4050 not specified Within 100m of VIP entrance. 30-40 seater buses preferred.

VVIP Load zone, bays (cars) n/a n/a 153 4.1.101 Emir and VVIP drop off (Precinct)

VVIP parking (cars) n/a n/a 6155 4.1.102 Precinct (Within outer perimeter)
Precinct (South of the Emir/VVIP drop
Emir's motorcade parking n/a n/a 259
off)
VIP shuttle services Load zone (bays) and parking area (buses) n/a n/a 4.2.101

VIP shuttle services Load zone (bays) and parking area (cars) n/a n/a 4.2.102

VIP parking (cars) n/a n/a 12388 4.2.103 Precinct (outside inner perimeter)

VIP parking (buses) n/a n/a 4.2.104

FIFA VIP Transport Desk n/a n/a 4.2.105

FIFA VIP Load Zone Base n/a n/a 4.2.106

30.17 Commercial affiliate hospitality - host 100 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 2500 Marketing will work on a ration of tickets to parking passes based on the total availability of parking spaces at the various venues.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

80 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 7200

30.19 Commercial hospitality - opening match and final 200 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 5000

200 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 18000

30.21 Commercial hospitality - host 800 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 20000

15 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 1350

30.23 Commercial hospitality - opening match and final 1000 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 25000

20 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 1800

30.24 Total_Commercial affiliate non-hospitality FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P 0 Larger amount for the opening match, quarter finals, semi-finals and final.

200 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 5000

300 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 27000

30.25 Commercial display 100 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 4000 Quantity of passes requested depends on activation of commercial display by the commercial affiliates.

10 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 2500

30.28 Marketing operations - host nation, group 50 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP

30.30 Marketing operations - opening match and final 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 0

Marketing/Youth programme parking (cars) n/a n/a P p 7.1.103

Marketing/Youth programme parking (buses) n/a n/a P p 7.1.104

30.31 FIFA / LOC staff parking 100 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 4500

30.32 FIFA/ LOC staff shuttle drop-off 1 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P P 90 Within stadium close to the main entrance

30.33 TV broadcast parking - opening match, semi-final and final 250 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 6250 Standard car parking spaces. Separate from broadcast compound.

30.35 Media parking 250 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 11250 Final stadium is allocated the larger amount.

Media shuttle Load zone, bays (buses) n/a n/a

Media own vehicle parking, (cars) n/a n/a

Media own vehicle parking, (buses) n/a n/a

Host Broadcasters own vehicle Load zone, bays (bus) n/a n/a 2.1.101

Host Broadcasters own vehicle parking (cars) n/a n/a 2.1.102

Host Broadcasters own vehicle parking (bus) n/a n/a 2.1.103

Media Rights Licensee’s (MRL) own vehicle parking (cars) n/a n/a 2.1.104

FIFA TV ENG Crew vehicle parking (cars) n/a n/a 2.1.105

30.36 Media drop-off 1 cars 25 FIFA 5th P p 25 Closest to media tribune or SMC entrance. Media drop-off may include shuttle services.

30.37 Volunteer centre (cars) 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.5.101

30.38 Accreditation centre parking 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.3.101

30.39 Stadium ticketing centre (STC) 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.4.101

Breakdown of parking allocation as follows: 20 parking spaces for MATCH IT & LOC IT staff, 15 parking spaces for rate card staff and 50 parking spaces for IT command centre
30.40 IT&T parking 85 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 2125 10.1.101
staff.

Cellular / Tetra mobile station parking (cars) n/a n/a 10.1.102

General Public/Spectators Parking (cars) n/a n/a 9.101

General Public/Spectators Parking (buses) n/a n/a 9.102

Accessible car parking for disabled people n/a n/a 9.103

Park and ride n/a n/a 9.104

Transport Mall(s) for General Public/Spectators Buses n/a n/a 9.105

Staging Area(s) for General Public/Spectators Buses n/a n/a 9.106

Total 3490 0 149765 22955

31 Security Services

31.01 Security Perimreters TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th P TBD

Outer Stadium Perimeter

Inner Stadium Perimeter Spectator Plaza

31.02 Stadium Operations Center (SOC) 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 03 130 276

31.03 Stadium operations meeting room 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 03 30 28 FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 02-0155 Meeting room required for daily briefings, de-briefings and emergency meetings for stadium-related matters.

31.04 Sound control room 1 3 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 15 Full view of the pitch, stadium and replay screen

31.05 Secure Storage TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 20 275

31.06 Break area / toilets TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 40 170

31.07 Security posts TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 TBD 9290

31.08 Working area / holding area TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 20

To include the following: vehicle queue, vehicle screening area, oversized vehicle screening area, by-pass lane, observation platform, security area (work & break area for
31.09 Remote search park / vehicle screening TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP TBD 32
screening personnel), material transfer area, toilets, lighting, vehicle permit check.

31.10 Spectator egress gates TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP Gates next to entry points for spectator egress.

31.11 Emergency Vehicles TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP 120 Security Compound (Precinct) Ambulance, fire engine and police parking within the stadium precinct.

31.12 Casualty clearing station TBD TBD FIFA 5th SC IP 9000 Governmental and host city plans will determine the requirements of this point.

31.13 Stewards’ holding area TBD TBD FIFA 5th SC S 00 3260 3261 Rest area required for stewards working at the stadium. Area to include lockers, toilets and sanitary facilities, F&B facilities, etc.

31.14 Helipad 1-2 TBD FIFA 5th IP TBD Large open area for helicopter landing / staging of VVIPs and emergency services.

Other Security Services n/a n/a 2653

Multi-casualty staging area n/a n/a 9195 8.1.11 FFL Lower Plaza B2

Total 3515
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location

. (FIFA 5th) Technical


(S) Stadium
Recomnedations 5th ed.
(SB) Seating Bowl
Design . (GG) Guide to Safety at Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium Lusail Stadium
Nº Spaces/ Required (m) Dimensions (IP) Inner Perimeter (OP) Proposed Required Min. Area Required Area Required Min. SC Requirement Tender Scheme Tender
Nº Space Requirement Sports Grounds Tender Scheme Area Tender Scheme Tender Scheme Location Tender Scheme Notes
Units Occupancy (m2) Areas Outer Perimeter (P) level m2 when SC uplift m2 Area m2 Area m2 Reference Scheme Level
Origin . (BP) Best Practice m2 Area m2 room Number
Precint
. (SC) Supreme
(HV) Hospitality Village
Committee

Circulation 176

00 167

03 9

Total 3691 25148 9120 32


Levels Minimum Requirements per floor (rooms & vertical circulation)_FIFA 5th (m2) & Best Practice*
00 - Players / FOP 37658
01 - Lower Concourse 15171
02 - Hospitality & VIP 14608
03 - Skybox & VVIP 11698
04 - Plant TBD & cores 5912
05 - Upper Concourse 1 17581
06 - Upper Concourse 2 6951
07 - Upper Concourse 3 4423
08 - Plant TBD 4216
TOTAL NIA Base Build 118218

FOP - Field of Play 10863


SB - Stadium Bowl Gen 313
LT - Lower Tier 19347
MT - Middle Tier (Skybox) 2156
UT - Upper Tier 34156
TOTAL FOP & Seating 66834

TOTAL all areas within stadium 185052

Legacy area requirments Area

West Stand. Offices total area 22665


South Stand. Clinics total area 17248
East Stand. Apartments total area 18920
North Stand. School total area 21691
TOTAL 80524
Difference Base to Legacy 37694
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

2 Spectator Areas

2.03 Total_F&B Concession Stands 4708

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 71 7.3.1 03-0066

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 49 03-0301

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 32 03-0302

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 100 03-0095

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0002

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 61 04-0014

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0018

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 61 04-0021

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0028

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0033

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 53 03-0003

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 106 03-0004

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 53 03-0005

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 106 03-0006

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 106 03-0008

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 53 03-0010

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 53 03-0012

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 117 03-0033

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 117 03-0035

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 80 03-0039

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 78 03-0041

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 78 03-0043

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 100 03-0044

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 100 03-0046

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 100 03-0048

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 71 03-0064

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 71 03-0066

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 49 03-0301

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 32 03-0302

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 3 100 03-0095


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0002

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 61 04-0014

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0018

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 61 04-0021

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0028

F&B stands S FFL Upper Tier 4 101 04-0033

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 42 7.3.1 PL-0061

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 32 PL-0062

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 54 PL-0063

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 88 PL-0073

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 71 PL-0081

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 77 PL-0086

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 71 PL-0091

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 87 PL-0101

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 88 PL-0108

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 94 PL-0118

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 89 PL-0127

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 80 PL-0134

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 89 PL-0141

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 94 PL-0148

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 88 PL-0155

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 87 PL-0165

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 71 PL-0174

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 77 PL-0181

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 71 PL-0185

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 87 PL-0193

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 54 PL-0198

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 32 PL-0199

Concession S FFL Plaza PL 42 PL-0206

Concession Storage S FFL Plaza PL 58 7.3.2 PL-0272

Concession Storage S FFL Plaza PL 58 7.3.2 PL-0273

2.04 Total_Spectator Seating 92000 Minimum seat spacing of 500mm for general spectators.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Spectator seats 9.1

Spectator seats

Easy access/standard seats (General spectators) 9.2.2

Easy access/amenity seats (General spectators)

Easy access/extra-width seats (General spectators)

2.05 Total_Spectator Medical Centre 134 300

Medical Centre SB/IP 16 03-0088

Medical Centre SB/IP 23 03-0321

Medical Centre SB/IP 22 03-0332

Medical Centre SB/IP 19 PL-0104

Medical Centre SB/IP 19 PL-0164

Medical Centre SB/IP 19 PL-0194


not
Medical Centre SB/IP 16 300
specified

Total_Concourse 27079

Concourse - GA Box Level - South east SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 587 02-0124

Concourse - GA Box Level - North east SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 586 02-0126

Concourse - GA Box Level - North west SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 529 02-0008

Concourse - GA South East SB FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 01-0066

Concourse - GA South West SB FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 01-0067

Concourse - GA North West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 01-0153

Concourse - GA North East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 9.4 01-0045

Concourse - GA Box Level -South west SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 529 02-0015

Concourse - GA Lower tier - North SB FFL Upper Tier 3 2904 9.4 03-0356

Concourse - GA Upper tier - East SB FFL Upper Tier 3 3291 03-0361

Concourse - GA Upper tier - East SB FFL Upper Tier 4 1777 03-0339

Concourse - GA Upper tier - South SB FFL Upper Tier 3 2904 03-0347

Concourse - GA Upper tier - West SB FFL Upper Tier 3 2655 03-0014

Concourse - GA Upper tier - West SB FFL Upper Tier 4 1752 03-0338

Concourse - GA Lower tier - East SB FFL Plaza PL 2239 PL-0227

Concourse - GA Lower tier - North SB FFL Plaza PL 1508 PL-0043

Concourse - GA Lower tier - South SB FFL Plaza PL 1514 PL-0046


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Concourse GA Box Level North SB FFL Hospitality Club 1 268 01-0044

Concourse GA Box Level South SB FFL Hospitality Club 1 268 01-0048

Concourse - GA Lower tier - North West SB FFL Plaza PL 582 PL-0045

Concourse - GA Lower tier - South West SB FFL Plaza PL 582 PL-0044

Total_WC's-Male Spectators 3535

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 9.201 01-0063

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0100

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0103

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0118

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0120

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0082

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0099

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0100

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 34 01-0154

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 34 01-0157

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 36 03-0020

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0021

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0028

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 76 03-0032

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 122 03-0034

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 124 03-0036

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 121 03-0038

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 124 03-0042

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 99 03-0047

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 41 03-0051

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 36 03-0053

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 52 03-0055

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 36 03-0056

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0060

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0061

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0063

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 98 03-0084


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 98 03-0089

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 120 03-0093

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 120 03-0174

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 62 03-0345

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 61 03-0346

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 62 03-0349

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 62 03-0352

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 76 03-0353

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 76 03-0354

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 76 03-0355

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 50 04-0005

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 129 04-0007

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 50 04-0020

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 61 04-0030

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 129 04-0032

Toilets (male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 50 04-0035

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 41 PL-0059

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 63 PL-0078

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0083

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0088

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 36 PL-0092

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 63 PL-0096

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 84 PL-0113

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 91 PL-0122

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 92 PL-0129

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 90 PL-0136

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 91 PL-0150

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 63 PL-0170

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 36 PL-0175

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0183

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 63 PL-0188

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 66 PL-0196


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (male) S FFL Plaza PL 41

Total_WC's-Female Spectators 3395 9.202

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0066

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 65 PL-0068

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0082

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0087

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0093

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 91 PL-0121

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 92 PL-0128

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 90 PL-0135

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 91 PL-0142

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 92 PL-0143

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 90 PL-0149

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 84 PL-0156

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0173

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0178

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0179

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0184

Toilets (female) S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0201

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0027

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 9 01-0062

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 9 01-0064

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 9 01-0065

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0101

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0102

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 9 01-0081

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 42 01-0155

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 42 01-0156

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0165

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 132 03-0002

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 41 03-0007

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0009


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0011

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 130 03-0013

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 132 03-0015

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 130 03-0016

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 130 03-0018

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 134 03-0022

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 132 03-0023

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 130 03-0024

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 39 03-0026

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 68 03-0027

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 39 03-0029

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 39 03-0052

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 39 03-0054

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 31 03-0057

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 36 03-0058

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0059

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 68 03-0062

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 98 03-0083

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 68 03-0350

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 69 03-0351

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 45 04-0006

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 110 04-0008

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 45 04-0019

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 56 04-0029

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 110 04-0031

Toilets (female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 44 04-0034

Total_WC’s–Wheelchair Accessible 164

Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and


S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 9.203 03-0025
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0030
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0090
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0091
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0092
disabled people)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and


S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0148
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0156
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0157
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0158
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0159
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0160
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0161
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 9.2.203 PL-0065
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0067
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0079
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0080
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0084
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0085
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0089
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0090
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0094
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0095
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0114
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0119
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0123
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0126
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0130
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0137
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0140
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0144
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0146
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0151
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0153
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0171
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0172
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0176
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0177
disabled people)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and


S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0180
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0182
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0186
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0187
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0197
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0202
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0217
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0218
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0219
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0220
disabled people)

Total_Spectator Prayer Rooms-Male 886

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 29 PL-0058

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 33 PL-0075

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0097

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 44 PL-0109

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 46 PL-0160

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 33 PL-0167

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 36 PL-0190

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0205

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 13 01-0158

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 13 01-0159

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0166

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0167

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0168

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0169

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 69 03-0049

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 88 03-0070

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 73 03-0071

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 107 03-0073

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 69 03-0081

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 3 54 03-0094

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Upper Tier 4 85 04-0001


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Total_Spectator Prayer Rooms-Female 542

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 13 01-0162

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 13 01-0163

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0170

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0175

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0178

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 51 03-0045

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 68 03-0072

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Upper Tier 3 68 03-0086

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 52 03-0319

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Upper Tier 4 55 03-0334

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 21 PL-0064

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 21 PL-0074

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 20 PL-0098

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0110

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 38 PL-0157

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 20 PL-0166

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 21 PL-0189

Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 22 PL-0200

Total_Ablution Area 677

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0149

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 4 88 04-0037

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 33 03-0109

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 5 PL-0053

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 14 PL-0076

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 8 PL-0077

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 8 PL-0099

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 14 PL-0100

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 12 PL-0111

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 9 PL-0112

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 9 PL-0158


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 11 PL-0159

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 14 PL-0168

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 8 PL-0169

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 8 PL-0191

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 14 PL-0192

Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 5 PL-0204

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 2 01-0164

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 2 01-0165

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 2 01-0167

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 2 01-0168

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0171

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0172

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0173

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0174

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0176

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0177

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0180

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 4 02-0181

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0096

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 31 03-0097

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 33 03-0098

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 33 03-0109

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 21 03-0117

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 21 03-0120

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 21 03-0183

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 21 03-0184

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0185

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0186

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 4 38 03-0323

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 4 46 03-0325

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 4 46 03-0330

Ablution Area S FFL Upper Tier 4 38 03-0335


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Total_”Lost Persons” report room 48 9.3

”Lost Persons” report room S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0343

”Lost Persons” report room S FFL Upper Tier 4 16 03-0331

”Lost Persons” report room S FFL Upper Tier 4 16 03-0337

Total_Lost Persons Room 140

Lost Persons Room S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0076

Lost Persons Room S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0087

Lost Persons Room S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0069

Lost Persons Room S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0105

Lost Persons Room S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0163

Lost Persons Room S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0195

Total_Spectator Circulation 6046

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 48 PL-0277

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0257

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0258

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0259

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0260

Corridor S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0047

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 6 PL-0278

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 91 PL-0283

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 13 PL-0290

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 18 PL-0293

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 15 PL-0298

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 15 PL-0299

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 15 PL-0300

Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 15 PL-0301

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0276

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 57 03-0280

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 74 03-0282

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0285

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0286


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 21 04-0206

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 74 04-0207

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 6 04-0198

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 29 04-0210

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 27 03-0289

Corridor S FFL Upper Tier 4 26 04-0199

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0297

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 29 03-0298

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 29 03-0299

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0300

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0301

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 29 03-0302

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 29 03-0303

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0304

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 17 04-0212

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0218

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0213

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0214

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 17 04-0215

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 17 04-0216

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0217

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 17 04-0219

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 25 04-0209

Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 7 03-0333

Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 7 03-0336

Lobby - GA Lower tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 381 PL-0241

Lobby - GA Upper tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 382 PL-0241

Lobby - GA Upper tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 458 PL-0035

Lobby - GA Lower tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 251 PL-0049

Lobby - GA Lower tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 251 PL-0050

Lobby - GA Lower tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 268 PL-0048

Lobby - GA Lower tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 268 PL-0055


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Lobby - GA Lower tier - North West S FFL Plaza PL 248 PL-0054

Lobby - GA Lower tier - South S FFL Plaza PL 220 PL-0038

Lobby - GA Lower tier - South S FFL Plaza PL 219 PL-0039

Lobby - GA Lower tier - South S FFL Plaza PL 268 PL-0051

Lobby - GA Lower tier - South S FFL Plaza PL 246 PL-0228

Lobby - GA Lower tier - South West S FFL Plaza PL 248 PL-0052

Lobby - GA Upper tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 220 PL-0037

Lobby - GA Upper tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 247 PL-0235

Lobby - GA Upper tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 220 PL-0288

Lobby - GA Upper tier - West S FFL Plaza PL 124 PL-0056

Lobby - GA Upper tier - West S FFL Plaza PL 155 PL-0287

Lobby - GA Upper tier - West S FFL Plaza PL 155 PL-0287

Lobby - GA Upper tier - North S FFL Plaza PL 155 PL-0286

3 Playing Area

3.03 Total_Substitutes's bench 0 These are seats for the substitutes in designated positions next to the pitch adjacent to the main stand.
not
Substitutes's bench FOP 1.1.3 SB-003
specified
not
Substitutes's bench FOP SB-004
specified

Total_Medical staff benches 0

Medical staff benches FOP 1.1.5 SB-007

Medical staff benches FOP SB-008

3.04 Total_Fourth official’s bench 0 Same design as substitute benches. Provides seating for one match official and three event coordinators.

not
Fourth official’s bench FOP 1.1.4 SB-005
specified
not
Fourth official’s bench FOP SB-006
specified

3.05 Total_Players’ outdoor warm-up areas 180 This is the area where the substitute players warm-up during the match.

Players’ outdoor warm-up areas FOP 90 1.1.6 SB-009

Players’ outdoor warm-up areas FOP 90 SB-010

Four tunnels in the stadium corners are ideal to support pitch ventilation. Tunnel height to accommmodate service vehicles (min
3.13 Total_Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access 448
5m).

Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access SB 57 1.1.7 SB-011


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access SB 57 SB-012

Service tunnel S FFL Basement B4 167 B4-0005

Service tunnel S FFL Basement B4 167 B4-0006

4 Dressing Room (Changing Rooms)

4.01 Total_Team A - dressing room 81 This is the main dressing room for Team A and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.

Minimum eleven shower heads. Towel hooks to be placed in an area next to showers for players to dry off. To include toilets,
4.02 Total_Showers & toilet facilities - Team A 60
urinals and sinks with mirrors.

4.03 Total_Massage room - Team A 93 The space would include 3 massage tables, utility table and ice machine.

This is a small office for the kit manager to store and distribute kit for players. A table, two chairs and a lockable cupboard are
4.04 Total_Kit manager’s room - Team A 51
required. Access/egress to this area must be accessible for large equipment.

4.05 Total_Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A 108 Provide four lockers, chairs, table, one toilet and one shower.

Space should be made available for a refrigerator and tables so that beverages, food or other items can be laid out for easy access
4.06 Total_Refreshment / utility area - Team A 30
by players and staff. The space could be in the open hallway area within team area or in dressing room itself.

4.08 Total_Team B - dressing room 164 This is the main dressing room for Team B and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.

4.09 Total_Showers & toilet facilities - Team B 86

4.10 Total_Massage room - Team B 94

4.11 Total_Kit manager’s room - Team A 50

4.12 Total_Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team B 81

4.13 Total_Refreshment / utility area - Team A 30

Total_Dressing Room Circulation Area 409

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 49 B3-0143

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 57 B3-0144

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 49 B3-0145

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 50 B3-0146

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 57 B3-0147

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 50 B3-0148

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 49 B3-0190


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 48 B3-0191

5 Medical Facilities

Total_Other medical facilities 272

First Aid Room S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0070

First Aid Room S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0104

First Aid Room S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0164

First Aid Room S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0194

First Aid Room S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0077

First Aid Room S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0088

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 8.2.6 03-0088

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Upper Tier 4 23 03-0321

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Upper Tier 4 22 03-0332

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0104

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0164

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0194

Spectator medical facilities S Spectator Plaza (Precinct) 30

Spectator medical facilities S FFL Upper Tier 3 16 03-0077

6 Doping Control

This is the area where players wait to be tested. The doping control room is connected to the waiting room and medical office.
6.01 Total_Waiting room 55
Must contain refrigerator with unopened drinks in plastic bottles, TV and waste bin.

Waiting room - Doping Control facilities S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 8.2.1.2 B3-0081

Doping Control facilities - Doping Control room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 8.2.1.1 B3-0083

7 FIFA Offices

Total_Other FIFA Offices 507 1023

Protocol meeting room S FFL Hospitality Club 1 25 5.1.2 01-0035


not not
Infotainment operator position N/R 5.1.3
specified specified
Brand protection office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 30 5.1.6 B3-0027
Goal line technology Operator Room (Camera- not not
N/R 5.1.8
based) specified specified
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Goal line technology storage room (Frequency- not not


N/R 5.1.9
based) specified specified
IT Stadium infrastructure support 1 (close to TCR1) S FFL Lower Plaza B2 29 5.1.12.1 B2-0032

IT Stadium infrastructure support 2 (close to TCR2) S FFL Lower Plaza B2 18 5.1.12.2 B2-0048

Technical services storage (Stadium) S FFL Lower Plaza B2 24 5.1.12.3 B2-0049

Field of play IT equipment storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 23 5.1.12.4 B3-0247
not
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) logistics office P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 70 5.1.15.1
specified
not
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) logistics office P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 25 5.1.15.2
specified
not
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 90 5.1.16.1
specified
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 14 5.1.16.1 B3-0115
not
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 90 5.1.16.2
specified
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 18 5.1.16.2 B3-0137

FIFA Match Delegates´ Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 5.1.24 B3-0093

FIFA General Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 52 5.1.25 B3-0026

Transport Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 20 5.1.25 B3-0168

Male Toilets S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 13 B3-0130

Female Toilets S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0131


not
FIFA/LOC Restaurant P Workforce compound (Precinct) 120
specified
not
Third Part Restaurant P Workforce compound (Precinct) 230
specified
not
VIK Program P Workforce compound (Precinct) 185
specified
Stadium Facilities Management S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 30 30 B3-0165

Stadium Management Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 31 31 B3-0166

Protocol Hostess Changing Room S FFL Plaza PL 34 34 PL-0232

FIFA Hospitality Office S FFL Plaza PL 25 25 PL-0233

Protocol Storage Room S FFL Plaza PL 20 20 PL-0234

Staff access S FFL Plaza PL 41 41 PL-0250

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0271

8 LOC Offices

8.24 Other_Total 60

Protocol Storage Room S FFL Plaza PL 20 PL-0234

Stadium Authority´s office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 40 B3-0092


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

9 Ceremonies

Total_Opening & closing ceremonies Ceremonies requirements will be decided when the ceremony concept is confirmed. Away from public routes and close to player /
9.01 1021
changing rooms (green room) service tunnels.
Opening & closing ceremonies not
P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 620 1.3.1
changing rooms (green room) - male specified
Opening & closing ceremonies not
P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 401 1.3.2
changing rooms (green room) - female specified

Area required for opening / closing ceremony rehearsals F&B requirements, holding areas, toilets and sanitary facilities and
Opening / closing ceremonies
9.03 496 800 transport requirements etc. Size of the location dependent on the ceremonies programme. In the Tender Scheme these areas
additional facilities_Total
include the production team office, the set up area and the storage space.

Opening/closing ceremonies - Production Team not


P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 400 1.3.4 Production Team Office (Tender Scheme brief)
Office specified
not
Ceremony Set-up and Storage space P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 400 1.3.5 Ceremony Set up and Storage space (Tender Scheme brief)
specified
Official Music Artists´ Dressing Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 1.3.11 B2-0077 Official Music Artists' Dressing Room (Tender Scheme brief)

Official Music Artists´ Dressing Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 346 1.3.11 B2-0053 Official Music Artists' Dressing Room (Tender Scheme brief)

Official Music Artists´ Production Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 104 1.3.12 B3-0249 Official Music Artists' Production Room (Tender Scheme brief)
not not
Ceremony Outdoor line up and holding area 1.3.6
specified specified

10 Merchandise Shops

Temporary kiosks may be required, depending on stadium capacity and existing structures situated at the stadium. Minimum of 8-
10.01 Official merchandise shops / kiosks_Total 0
25 kiosks required of various sizes. Power to be supplied by the stadium to all outlets and surrounding area, must be well lit.

Merchandise concession shops/kiosks 7.3.4

Merchandising Concession Compound P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 7.3.6

Ideally secure space inside the stadium of minimum 500m² is available. If space or limited space is not available within the
10.02 Merchandise storage_Total 1500
stadium, a space for 6 -12 sea containers (dependent on stadium capacity) is required.

Super store P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 300 7.3.7

Storage for commercial display P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 1200

Merchandising Concession internal Storage 7.3.5

11 Service Compounds

The location of the compound is to support various operations and the storage of goods, i.e. F&B, IT&T, merchandise, logistics, site
management, waste management etc. The layout of the compound(s) should include demacration of areas with security fencing
(2 metres high), dry and cold storage containers and dedicated access gates with sufficient area for simulateous large delivery
11.01 Total_Back-of-house compound 379 vehicles and forklifts. Area should be clear of internal spectator traffic and venue dressing applied to fence lines to conceal the
operation. The compound must have proper ground preparation, drainage, lighting and services. As this area will be erected prior
to/during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post- and during operations. Power distribution may be
required for refrigerated containers.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

after
Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 53 01-0086
7.1.106
Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 11 01-0087

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0089

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0090

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 62 01-0092

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0134

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0185

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0188

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 15 01-0125

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 15 01-0133

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 15 01-0183

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 15 01-0184

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 11 01-0118

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 11 01-0122

Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 11 01-0126

Ideally, 150% of stadium capacity inventory to be stored in existing facilities. The remaining inventory will be stored in containers
11.02 Total_F&B storage 155 within the stadium perimeter (back of house). It is important that this compound is as close to the stadium as possible. Power to
be supplied by stadium.

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 7.3.2 04-0033

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0085

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0094

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0096

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0127

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0129

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0131

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0179

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0180

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0181

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 04-0033

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0085

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0094

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0096

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0127


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0129

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0131

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0179

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0180

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0181

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0182

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0183

F&B storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0189

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0305

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0306

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0085

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0079

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 5 04-0023

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 5 04-0025

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 5 04-0041

F&B storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 5 04-0042

11.04 Total_Waste removal / recycling 1378

Bin Storage S FFL Plaza PL 51 PL-0072

Bin Storage S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0245

Bin Storage S FFL Plaza PL 51 PL-0246

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0014

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0020

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0037

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 9 02-0038

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0104

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 9 02-0105

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0109

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 9 02-0110

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0114

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0135

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0136

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0190


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21 01-0189

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 15 01-0190

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21 01-0191

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21 01-0192

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0123

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0125

Bin Storage S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 10 02-0128

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 28 03-0017

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 20 03-0100

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 32 03-0173

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 34 03-0171

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 33 03-0172

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 33 03-0031

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0175

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0176

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0177

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0178

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0179

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0180

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0181

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 14 03-0182

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0017

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0024

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 7 04-0026

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 6 04-0027

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0036

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0049

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0052

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0050

Bin Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 4 04-0051

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0115

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0296


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0108

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0120

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0124

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0125

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0131

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0133

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0138

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0139

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0145

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0147

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0152

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0154

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0221

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0226

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 1 PL-0289

Cleaning Storage S FFL Plaza PL 1 PL-0290

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 1 03-0105

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0106

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0107

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0108

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0110

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 5 03-0111

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0112

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 4 03-0113

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0115

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 2 03-0116

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0118

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 2 03-0119

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0121

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 2 03-0122

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0123

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 2 03-0124


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 11 03-0125

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 11 03-0126

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 11 03-0127

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 11 03-0128

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0138

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0139

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0140

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0141

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0142

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 7 03-0143

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0144

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0145

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0151

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0152

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0153

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 3 03-0154

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0155

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 8 03-0162

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 8 03-0163

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 8 03-0164

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 8 03-0165

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0167

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0168

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 3 6 03-0362

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 3 04-0043

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 3 04-0044

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 3 04-0045

Cleaning Storage S FFL Upper Tier 4 3 04-0046

Changing Place S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0261

Changing Place S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0262

Changing Place S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0263

Changing Place S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0264


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Waste Room S 42 PL-0026

Waste Room S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0076

Waste Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 257 B3-0024

Waste Room 16 PL-0008

11.05 Total_Logistics compound / office 4654 33860


Next to Remote Search Park/VSA
LOG Point - Logistic Entry Point P 9100 10.2.1
(Precinct)
LOG Point Office P Incl. in 10.2.1 (Precinct) 15

Truck holding zone P Incl. in 10.2.1 (Precinct) 600

Truck queuing area (10 trucks) P Incl. in 10.2.1 (Precinct) 600


Remote search park / vehicle screening / LOG
P Incl. in 10.2.1 (Precinct) 4000
Point
LOG Compound - Logistics compound

LOG Compound - Logistics compound P Logistics Compound (Precicnt) 12232

LOG Compound Office P Logistics Compound (Precicnt) 15

General storage area / open space

General storage area / lockable

Material storage inside Stadium for functional

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 74 B2-0061

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 91 B2-0067

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 124 PL-0161

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 39 PL-0162

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0222

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0223

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 51 PL-0224

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 50 PL-0225

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 39 PL-0240

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 42 PL-0284

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 42 PL-0285

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 115 B3-0171

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 73 B3-0187

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 162 B2-0031

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 80 B2-0050

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 87 B2-0051


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 38 B2-0058

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 81 B2-0059

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0060

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 38 B2-0066

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 48 B2-0131

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 50 B2-0132

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 124 PL-0107

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 124 PL-0161

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 39 PL-0162

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 39 PL-0240

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 75 B3-0139

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 74 B2-0061

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 162 B2-0031

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 80 B2-0050

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 87 B2-0051

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 38 B2-0058

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 81 B2-0059

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0060

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 38 B2-0066

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 48 B2-0131

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 50 B2-0132

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 75 B3-0139

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 115 B3-0171

Stadium Storage S FFL Plaza PL 124 PL-0107

Stadium Storage S FFL Lower Plaza B2 91 B2-0067

Material storage inside Stadium close to field S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 84 B3-0022

Material Storage close to FoP S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 39 B3-0085

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 64 B3-0212

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 81 B3-0219

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 111 B3-0220

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 111 B3-0221

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 64 B3-0222


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 50 B3-0224

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 92 B3-0225

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0226

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 92 B3-0227

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0228

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 46 B3-0229

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 81 B3-0230

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 64 B3-0231

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 64 B3-0232

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 81 B3-0233

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 46 B3-0234

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 92 B3-0235

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 92 B3-0236

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 50 B3-0237

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 64 B1-0009

Logistics S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 64 B1-0012

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Club 1 16 01-0179

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0186

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Club 1 16 01-0189

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Club 1 16 01-0190

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Club 1 15 01-0200

Logistics S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 17 02-0211

Logistics S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0296

Goods in staging and marshalling P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 120

Goods receipt offices P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 15

FM and distribution vehicles P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 500

Sponsor buggies P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 300

PRM buggies P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 300

Briefing/ meeting rooms P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 120

FM offices P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 150

Staff Toilets, Showers, Prayer facilities, restroom P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 300

FM workshops, including landscaping P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 400


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

General storage P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 40

FM materials storage P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 300


Cleaning consumables storage (including HAZMAT
P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 500
and PPE)
Staff Catering Compound
Staff catering compound P 3000
(Precinct)
Central Waste Storage Room P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 375

Interim waste area (staff catering compound) P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 59

Volunteer Centre Interim Waste Room P Volunteer Centre (Precinct) 16

Accreditation Centre interim waste room P Accreditation Centre (Precinct) 16


Stadium Ticketing Centre
Stadium Ticketing Centre interim waste room P 16
(Precinct)
Accreditation centre interim waste room P Accreditation Centre (Precinct) 15

F&B stand Interim waste storage P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 534

Mechandise shops/kiosks interim waste room P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 38

Commercial display interim waste room P Marketing/Concessions (Precinct) 54

Broadcast compound interim waste room Broadcast Compound (Precinct) 28

Media Centre interim waste room P Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 28

IT&T interim waste room P IT&T Compound (Precinct) 16

Ceremonies interim waste room P Ceremonies compound (Precinct) 58

12 Stadium Signage and décor

13 Hospitality Areas – Stadium

Skyboxes must represent a minimum of 30% of the hospitality programme.Final number of suites and skyboxes to be confirmed by
Skyboxes & Suites S 4029 designer, all to have unobstructed view of FOP.
The Tender Scheme includes 2803 seats in the Skyboxes.

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0001

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0002

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0003

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0004

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0005

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 207 6.1.4.2 02-0006

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0012
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 208 6.1.4.2 02-0013

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 93 6.1.4.2 02-0017

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0020

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0021

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0028

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0029

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 47 6.1.4.2 02-0030

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 48 6.1.4.2 02-0031

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0044

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0045

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0046

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0047

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0048

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0070

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0071

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0072

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0073

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0074

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 207 6.1.4.2 02-0075

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 208 6.1.4.2 02-0076

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 109 6.1.4.2 02-0077

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0078

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0079

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0080

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0081

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0082

Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 93 6.1.4.2 02-0085

Best practice 900mm deep rows.


Sky box seating area SB 2197
SC states 1000mm rows.
Hospitality Boxes (Seats) S 6.1.4.1

Wheelchair user places (in skyboxes) S 6.1.5

Easy access/standard seats S 6.1.6.1

Easy access/amenity seats S 6.1.6.2


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Easy access/extra-width seats S 6.1.6.3

These do not require a view of the FOP.


Total_Hospitality lounges S 3434
The Tender Scheme includes 5436 Hospitality seats.
Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 489 6.1.4.2 02-0093

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 488 6.1.4.2 02-0097

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 100 6.1.7 02-0034

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 843 6.1.7 02-0094

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 98 6.1.7 02-0095

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 839 6.1.7 02-0096

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 293 6.1.7 01-0061

Hospitality Lounges S FFL Hospitality Club 1 284 6.1.7 01-0036

Total_Hospitality seating Area SB 3383

Easy access/standard seats SB 6.1.3.1

Easy access/amenity seats SB 6.1.3.2

Easy access/extra-width seats 6.1.3.3

Total_Hospitality Wheelchair seating area SB 0


Seats for disabled guests with wheelchairs (in
SB 6.1.2
Hospitality area)
Wheelchair user places (in hospitality zone) SB 6.1.2

Total_Hospitality Entrance Lobbies 14851

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 293 6.1.7 01-0006

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1054 01-0039

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 2 1105 6.1.8 01-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1226 01-0007

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1383 01-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0014

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0092

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 1382 6.1.8 01-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 285 6.1.7 01-0008

Lobby - Hospitality - West North S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0010
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Lobby - Hospitality - West South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0018

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Plaza PL 234 6.1.7 PL-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Plaza PL 285 6.1.7 PL-0242

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Plaza PL 284 6.1.7 PL-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Plaza PL 273 6.1.7 PL-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 6.1.7 01-0153

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Plaza PL 273 6.1.7 PL-0042

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1625 6.1.7 PL-0043

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1226 6.1.7 01-0007

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0068

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0075

Total_Hospitality Entrance Lobbies 14851

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 293 6.1.7 01-0006

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1054 01-0039

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 2 1105 6.1.8 01-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1226 01-0007

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1383 01-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0014

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0092

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 1382 6.1.8 01-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 285 6.1.7 01-0008

Lobby - Hospitality - West North S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0010

Lobby - Hospitality - West South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0018

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Plaza PL 234 6.1.7 PL-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Plaza PL 285 6.1.7 PL-0242

Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Plaza PL 284 6.1.7 PL-0041

Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Plaza PL 273 6.1.7 PL-0040

Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 6.1.7 01-0153

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Plaza PL 273 6.1.7 PL-0042

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1625 6.1.7 PL-0043

Lobby - Hospitality - East S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1226 6.1.7 01-0007

Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0068
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0075

Total_Hospitality Toilets Male 464

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 16 6.1.201 02-0182

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 16 02-0186

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 18 01-0069

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 26 01-0170

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 26 01-0172

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 26 01-0173

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 26 01-0175

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 43 01-0025

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 24 01-0072

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 29 02-0099

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 29 02-0107

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 29 02-0113

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 29 02-0117

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 18 01-0079

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 43 01-0110

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 18 01-0114

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 19 01-0143

Toilets (male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 16 02-0140

Toilets (male) S FFL 02 Plant P2 13 P2-0032

Total_Hospitality Toilets Female 450

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 13 6.1.202 02-0185

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0169

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0171

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0174

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0176

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 28 01-0024

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 19 01-0071

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 27 01-0073

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 33


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 33 02-0106

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 33 02-0112

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 33 02-0116

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 13 02-0119

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 20 01-0080

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 28 01-0109

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 20 01-0113

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 19 01-0127

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 18 01-0142

Toilets (female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 11 02-0139

Toilets (female) S FFL 02 Plant P2 10 P2-0033

Total_Hospitality Toilets Accesible S 88


Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 6.1.203 01-0178
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0026
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0111
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0112
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0141
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0144
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0145
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0145
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0146
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0147
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0148
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0149
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0150
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0151
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5 02-0152
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0146
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0147
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0160
disabled people)
Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0161
disabled people)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and


S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0177
disabled people)

Other areas 1002

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 9 02-0160

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 7 02-0161

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 7 02-0162

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0163

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 8 01-0149

Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 8 01-0150

Pray Room S FFL Hospitality Club 1 11 01-0151

Pray Room S FFL Hospitality Club 1 13 01-0152

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0011

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 32 01-0053

Pray Room (Female) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0035

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 29 02-0016

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 25 02-0019

Pray Room (Male) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 34 01-0091

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0007

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0039

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0040

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0041

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0042

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0043

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0049

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0050

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0051

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0052

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0053

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 19 02-0054

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 19 02-0055

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0057

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0058

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0059


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0060

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0061

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0062

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0063

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0064

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0065

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0066

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0067

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 19 02-0068

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 19 02-0069

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0083

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0084

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0086

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0087

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 13 02-0088

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0089

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0090

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0091

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 25 01-0015

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 32 01-0016

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 17 01-0049

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 47 01-0055

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 47 01-0056

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 37 01-0060

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 17 01-0115

Hospitality Bar S FFL Hospitality Club 01 17 01-0119

13 Hospitality VIP/VVIP Areas – Stadium

13.16 Total_VVIP/VIP medical room(s) 44

Dependent on size, a second VIP medical room may be required. VVIP medical room required if the VVIP tribune is on a separate
VVIP/VIP medical room(s) S FFL Plaza PL 23 8.2.3 PL-0021 level to the VIP tribune and to be in close proximity to their seating and lifts. Unrestricted access for stretcher-bearers. Minimum
size – 20m². Dedicated doctor to be made available.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

VVIP/VIP medical room(s) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 21 01-0037

13.17 Total_VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) 646

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 102 01-0005

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S FFL Hospitality Club 1 110 01-0017

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S FFL Emir EM 141 EM-0024

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S FFL Emir EM 15 EM-0005

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S FFL Emir EM 15 EM-0007

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S PL-0018 111 PL-0018

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S VP-0014 66 VP-0014

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S VP-0003 64 VP-0003

VVIP/VIP Kitchen(s) S PL-0231 22 PL-0231

Total_VVIP Toilets Male 58

VVIP Toilets Male S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 13 02-0193

VVIP Toilets Male S FFL Hospitality Club 1 16 01-0077

VVIP Toilets Male S FFL Hospitality Club 1 16 01-0128

VVIP Toilets Male S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 13 02-0192

Total_VVIP Toilets Accesible 60

VVIP Toilets Accesible FFL Hospitality Club 1 3 01-0021

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Hospitality Club 1 4 01-0078

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Emir EM 6 EM-0001

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0046

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Emir EM 6 EM-0002

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Emir EM 6 EM-0003

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Hospitality Club 1 5 01-0140

VVIP Toilets Accesible S FFL Emir EM 6 EM-0004

S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19 B3-0169

Total_VIP Toilets Male 129

VIP Toilets Male S FFL Plaza PL 22 PL-0016

VIP Toilets Male S FFL Plaza PL 31 PL-0029

VIP Toilets Male S FFL VIP Lounge VP 38 VP-0008


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

VIP Toilets Male S FFL VIP Lounge VP 38 VP-0013

Total_VIP Toilets Female 87

VIP Toilets Female S FFL Plaza PL 26 PL-0002

VIP Toilets Female S FFL Plaza PL 27 PL-0023

VIP Toilets Female S FFL VIP Lounge VP 34 VP-0007

VIP Toilets Accesible 58

S FFL VIP Lounge VP 34 VP-0012

S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0015

S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0024

S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0267

S FFL Plaza PL 3 PL-0268

S FFL VIP Lounge VP 3 VP-0004

S FFL VIP Lounge VP 3 VP-0006

S FFL VIP Lounge VP 3 VP-0009

S FFL VIP Lounge VP 3 VP-0010

Total_VVIP Circulation & other spaces 2515

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 49 PL-0007

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 49 PL-0010

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Club 1 30 01-0018

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Club 1 41 01-0029

Corridor S FFL Emir EM 127 EM-0025

Corridor S FFL Emir EM 68 EM-0021

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Club 1 116 01-0054

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Club 1 30 01-0058

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Club 1 85 01-0129

Emir Access S FFL Emir EM 219 EM-0026

Emir Room S FFL Emir EM 87 EM-0022

Emir Lift S FFL Plaza PL 7 PL-0216

Emir/VVIP Entrance S FFL Plaza PL 439 PL-0001


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Loading Area S FFL Emir 35 EM-0019

Loading Area S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 21 01-0059

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0191

Servery S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 14 02-0067

Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0089

Plant S FFL Emir EM 8 EM-0027

Plant S FFL Emir EM 8 EM-0027

VVIP Helipad S Precinct (Adjacent to VVIP Parking) 1600

Protocol Office S FFL Emir (EM) EM 9 EM-0017

Protocol Office S FFL Hospitality Club (01) 1 8 01-0030

Protocol Office S FFL Hospitality Club (01) 1 8 01-0031

Protocol Office S FFL Emir (EM) EM EM-0016

VVIP wardrobe S FFL Plaza PL 5 PL-0281

VVIP Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 413 01-0011

Lobby S FFL Emir EM 13 EM-0006

Media Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 107 PL-0057

Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 21 PL-0031

Lobby S FFL Emir EM 15 EM-0012

Lobby S FFL Emir EM 15 EM-0013

Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0032

Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0130

Lobby S FFL Hospitality Box 2 27 02-0091

Lobby S FFL Emir EM 13 EM-0008

VVIP Ablution Area S FFL Emir EM 17 EM-0014

VVIP Ablution Area S FFL Emir EM 17 EM-0015

VVIP Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0138

VVIP Ablution Area S FFL Hospitality Club 1 10 01-0139

VVIP Pray Room Male N/R 19 01-0023

VVIP Pray Room Male N/R 14 EM-0010

VVIP Pray Room Female N/R 13 EM-0011


not
RF President's Lounge N/R TBD
specified
Royal Box S FFL Emir EM 87 EM-0023
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0028

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0070

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0077

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0061

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0078

Royal Box S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0062

Total_VIP Circulation & other spaces 770

VIP wardrobe area S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0231

VIP wardrobe S FFL Plaza PL 22 PL-0231

VIP Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0032

VIP Ablution Area S FFL Plaza PL 22 PL-0033

VIP Pray Room Male S FFL Plaza PL 22

VIP Pray Room Male S FFL Plaza PL 23 01-0023

VIP Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 16 PL-0019

VIP Pray Room Female S FFL Plaza PL 29 PL-0022

VIP Entrance S FFL Plaza PL 251 PL-0003

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 35 PL-0282

Loading Area S FFL Plaza PL 19 PL-0004

Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 23 PL-0014

Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 37 PL-0025

Pantry S FFL Plaza PL 12 PL-0011

Corridor S FFL VIP Lounge VP 19 VP-0015

Corridor S FFL VIP Lounge VP 19 VP-0016

Corridor S FFL VIP Lounge VP 80 VP-0011

Corridor S FFL VIP Lounge VP 67 VP-0005

Loading Area S FFL VIP Lounge VP 20 VP-0001

14 Hospitality Areas – Stadium Precinct

Total_Other Hospitality Spaces 800


Commercial Affiliate Village
Goods receipt office (Commercial affiliate village) 20
(Precinct)
Loading bay area, incl. manoeuvring and Commercial Affiliate Village
750
offloading space (Commercial affiliate village) (Precinct)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Commercial Affiliate Village


Transport Office (Commercial Affiliate Village) 20
(Precinct)
Waste Collection Compound (Hospitality Village) 6.2.3
Commercial Affiliate Village
Technical room in Commercial Hospitality Village 10
(Precinct)
Toilets (male) OP Hospitality Villages (Precinct) TBC 6.2.201

Toilets (female) OP Hospitality Villages (Precinct) TBC 6.2.202


Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
OP Hospitality Villages (Precinct) TBC 6.2.203
disabled people)

15 Media Interview Areas

Unobstructed view of pitch. Provided via a temporary construction within the stands or hospitality suite if availabl. Approximately
15.0315.05Total_Presentation studios 307
5m x 5m x 4m with cable pathways, technical power, HVAC, angled window with view of pitch.

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 38 2.1.5 02-0022

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 38 02-0023

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 38 02-0024

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 39 02-0025

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 39 02-0026

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 38 02-0032

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 40 02-0033

Presentation studios S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 37 02-0121

15.06 Total_TV/ Interview Studios 199

Close to player's dressing rooms. Location includes installation and construction, cable pathways, HVAC and both technical and
TV/ Interview Studios S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 53 2.1.8 B3-0042
domestic power to be identified.

TV/Interview Studios S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 51 B3-0043

TV/Interview Studios S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 48 B3-0044

TV/Interview Studios S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 47 B3-0045

15.07 Total_Pre-Mixed zone 37

Pre-Mixed zone S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 3.1.2.1 B3-0033

Pre-Mixed zone S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19 B3-0035

15.09 Total_Coach on Arrival Interview Position 35

Located in route from the player's drop-off to the dressing rooms. Position required for an interview with the team coach on
Coach on Arrival Interview Position S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 2.1.9 B3-0034
arrival at the stadium.

Coach on Arrival Interview Position S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 17 B3-0036


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

16 Press Conference Room

17 Media Areas–Tribune

Seat allocations, by constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium. The
17.04 Total_Tribune photographers 100
larger quantity required for the opening match, semi-finals and final (100).

Tribune photographers S 20 3.1.7 SB-026

Tribune photographers S 20 SB-027

Tribune photographers S 20 SB-028

Tribune photographers S 20 SB-029

Tribune photographers S 20 SB-030

Observer seats are without desks and in the proximity of the media tribune’s seats that are without desks. Seat allocations, by
17.05 Total_Observer seats 245
constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium.

Observer seats S 231 3.1.8 SB-031

Observer seats S 7 SB-032

Observer seats S 7 SB-033

18 Stadium Media Centre

18.07 Total_Meeting room 0

Meeting room OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 3.2.10

Meeting room OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 3.2.11

18.08 Total_Camera repair service 50

Camera repair service – Partner 1 OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.28

Camera repair service – Partner 2 OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25

18.09 Total_Information desk 100

Tourism board Information desk OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.25

SMC Information desk OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.17

IT Helpdesk OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 50 3.2.20

18.13 Total_Ticket distribution desk Media Tribune 50

Ticket distribution desk Media Tribune OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.18 One for press, one for photographers.

Ticket distribution desk Photographers OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.19


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

18.17 Total_Photographers' work desks 260 419

Photographers' working room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 260 3.1.4 B3-0030 Final match requires the larger amount (150).

Photographers’ working area OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 419 3.2.13 160 for opening match and final. Dimensions are 1.8m wide x 1.6m

Total_SMC Other Areas 29

FIFA/LOC Media Office Reception Desk

FIFA Venue Media Officers (FVMO) OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

FIFA Media Officers (visiting) OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

FIFA Digital Office OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

LOC Venue Press Officers (VPO) OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

LOC Deputy Press Officer (VDPO) OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

FIFA/LOC Communications OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

Volunteers area OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25

Internet corner OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)

Postal service desk

Toilets OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)


Toilets (accessible for wheelchair users and
OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 4
disabled people)

Total_Media Concourse 787

Media Concourse S FFL Upper Tier 3 159 03-0137

Media Concourse S FFL Upper Tier 3 163 03-0102

Media Concourse S FFL Upper Tier 3 155 03-0103

Media Concourse S FFL Upper Tier 3 155 03-0104

Media Concourse S FFL Upper Tier 3 155 03-0103

19 FIFA New Media Areas

20 Broadcast Compound

Total_Broadcast Compound Other Spaces 620

Broadcast Compound/HB-Building OP Broadcast Compound (Precinct) 500 2.2.1

Equipment Room Container (TER) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Camera Shading Room (CSR) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Main control room (MCR) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Audio control room (ACR) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Multi feeds room Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

SloMo Control Room Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Unilateral Control Room Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Telecom Interface Room (TIR) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Technical Operations Centre (TOC) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Cable Interconnection Room (CIR) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Infotainment Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Production Office Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Meeting Room Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Broadcast Venue Management Office Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Broadcast Information Office (BIO) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

MRL Office Containers Broadcast Compound (Precinct) incl.

Catering Facility Broadcast Compound (Precinct) TBD


Power Generator Area (Broadcast Technical Power
Broadcast Compound (Precinct) TBD
Supply)
Remote Interpretation Centre Broadcast Compound (Precinct) 120

Toilets (male) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) TBD

Toilets (female) Broadcast Compound (Precinct) TBD

21 Broadcast Areas

Total_Broadcast Areas' Toilets & Circulation 373

Toilets (male) S BRD-Male Toilet 2 10 2.2.201 02-0142

Toilets (female) S BRD-Female Toilet 2 10 02-0143

Broadcast lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 305 02-0164

Broadcast lobby S FFL Plaza PL 34 PL-0251

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 14 PL-0297

22 Camera Positions

Total_Other Camera Positions Spaces 180

Camera platforms 2.1.1


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Cameras MC (3 x on 1 platform) 57 SB-013

Camera GHiL (Tactical camera)

Camera GHiR

Camera 16HiL 6 SB-014

Camera 16HiL 6 SB-016

Camera 16HiR 6 SB-015

Camera 16HiR 6 SB-017

Camera Crane L

Camera Crane R

Camera StL (Steadicam)

Camera StR (Steadicam)

Camera FGL

Camera UML

Camera FGR

Camera UMR

Camera TCL (Team Camera) 7 SB-018

Camera TCR (Team Camera) 7 SB-019

Playercam (PCL)

Playercam (PCR)

CentreLine Pitch Level (PiC)

Camera ReCL (SSM)

Camera ReCR (SSM)

6m left (6mL)

6m right (6mR)

Camera RePiC (Reverse Centre Pitch Level)

Camera MReC (Reverse Centre High)

Camera BxL (Box Cam left)

Camera BxR (Box Cam right)

Main unilateral camera platform (C)*

Main unilateral camera platform 37 SB-020

Main unilateral camera platform 37 SB-021


Unilateral High behind goal left camera platform
(GA)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Unilateral High behind goal right platfroms (GB)

Main reverse unilateral camera ( R ) 11 SB-022

Unilateral camera position – FA1

Unilateral camera position – FA2

Unilateral camera position – FB1

Unilateral camera position – FB2


Camera platforms for special productions
,e.g. 4k/8K etc.
RF Link for wireless cameras

Speciality Camera Positions

Microphone Positions

23 International Broadcast Centre (IBC)

24 IT Technical Areas

Total_IT Technical Areas Circulation 0

Passenger Lifts

Cargo Lifts

Escalators

Total_Other IT Technical Areas 81

Trunked radio systems / Office space 10.3.1

Waste Collection Compound (general)

Giant Video Screens control room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0137

Giant Video Screens S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0137

PA System / Control room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0137

CATV control room

Pitch Management Equipment - storage facility

Back-up generators (Domestic Power Supply)

Cable pathways

Cable bridge

Cable interface room

25 Accreditation Centre
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

26 Stadium Ticketing Centre (STC)

26.07 Total_Secure storage 20 The area of 20m² is subdivided in two rooms. The first room is for ticket stock (4m²) the second for hardware (16m²).

Secure storage - Ticket Stock P Ticketing Centre (Precinct) 4 5.4.1.7.1

Secure storage - hardware P Ticketing Centre (Precinct) 16 5.4.1.7.2

27 Volunteer Centre

28 Flagpoles

29 Transport Areas (drop off)

30 Parking Facilities

30.04 Total_Team guests' parking s 0 Six cars and one bus per team, situated with direct access to the relevant seating allocation within the stadium bow.

Team guests' parking 1.2.104

Team guests' parking 1.2.105


Drop-off and pick-up ideally underneath the main stand. If exposed to spectator missile, then overhang or canopy covering
30.05 Total_Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking S vehicles should extend the match officials' entry/exit point of stadium. Parking located near the entrance. Additional parking for
police escort vehicles to be considered in the overall allocation.
Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 1.2.106

Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 1.2.107

Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 1.2.108

30.24 Total_Commercial affiliate non-hospitality 0 Larger amount for the opening match, quarter finals, semi-finals and final.

Commercial affiliate non-hospitality (cars) P 7.1.105

Commercial affiliate non-hospitality (buses) P 7.1.106

30.25 Total_Commercial display 4000 Quantity of passes requested depends on activation of commercial display by the commercial affiliates.
Generic Commercial Clients Shuttle Load zone,
P 6.2.101
bays (buses)
Commercial FIFA affiliate hospitality own vehicle Hospitality Parking (Precinct-
P 4000 6.2.102
parking (cars) priority 2)
Commercial FIFA affiliate hospitality own vehicle
P 6.2.102
parking (cars)
Commercial affiliate hospitality own vehicle
P 6.2.103
parking (buses)
Commercial hospitality - (indoor)
Skyboxes/Business seats own vehicle parking S 6.1.101
(buses)
Commercial hospitality - (indoor)
Skyboxes/Business seats own vehicle parking S 6.1.102
(cars)
Commercial hospitality (outdoor) own vehicles
P 6.2.104
parking (cars)
Commercial hospitality (outdoor) own vehicles
P 6.2.105
parking (buses)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Total_Marketing operations - opening match and


30.30 0
final
Marketing operations - opening match and final P 7.1.101

Marketing operations - opening match and final P 7.1.102

31 Security Services

31.02 Total_Stadium Operations Center (SOC) 276

This is the hub of the operations in the stadium. Security and disaster management will be handled from the SOC. Uninterrupted
Stadium Control Room (Venue Operation Centre) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 128 02-0134 view of the pitch and stadium bowl, supplemented by CCTV images of stadium spectators entry and egress pointsw, including the
transport hubs.

Stadium/Event Operations S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 148 02-0135

CCTV control room

31.05 Total_Secure Storage 275

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 15 8.1.8 PL-0207

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 15 PL-0208

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 20 PL-0209

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 19 PL-0210

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 20 PL-0211

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 15 PL-0212

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 14 PL-0213

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 16 PL-0236

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 9 PL-0252

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 9 PL-0253

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 7 PL-0254

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 7 PL-0255

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 7 PL-0256

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 16 PL-0266

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 7 PL-0274

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 9 PL-0275

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 9 PL-0276

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0292

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0293

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0294


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0295

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0296

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 5 PL-0297

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0298

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0299

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 3 PL-0300

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0301

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0302

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0303

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0304

Storage for confiscated items S FFL PLAZA PL 4 PL-0305

31.06 Total_Break area / toilets 170

Toilets S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 6 B3-0138

Toilet S FFL Plaza PL 9 PL-0047

Female Cloakroom S FFL 02 Plant 2 6 P2-0037

Lobby S FFL 02 Plant 2 12 P2-0038

Lobby S FFL 02 Plant 2 12 P2-0041

Male Cloakroom S FFL 02 Plant P2 11 P2-0036

Toilets S FFL Hospitality Club 1 6 01-0047

VOC Canteen S FFL 02 Plant P2 43 P2-0042

VOC Canteen Store Room S FFL 02 Plant P2 5 P2-0039

VOC Circulation Stairwell S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 23 02-0158

VOC Circulation Stairwell S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 P2-0040

Disabled Toilets S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 6 02-0136

Disabled Toilets S FFL 02 Plant P2 4 P2-0035

Disabled Toilets S FFL 02 Plant P2 4 P2-0044

31.07 Total_Security posts 9290


Pitch protection (barriers and/or security
personnel)
Entrance points

Spectators checkpoints near every entry point


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Police detention cells S FFL Lower Plaza B2 346 B2-0009

Police detention cells S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0064

Police detention cells S FFL Lower Plaza B2 258 B2-0075

Security Post

Police Station
Security services Transport services Load Zone,
bays (buses)
Security services Transport services parking (cars)

Security services Transport services parking (cars)


Security services Transport services parking
(buses)
SWAT Room S FFL Hospitality Club 1 101 01-0038

SWAT Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 91 P5-0003

EOD Room P Security Compound (Overlay) 45

Riot Squad Rooms P Security Compound (Overlay) 400

Riot squad Parlking (SUV) P Security Compound (Overlay) 1250

Riot Squad Parlking (50 pax. coaches) P Security Compound (Overlay) 5000

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 42 B3-0039

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 42 B3-0242

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza B2 320 B2-0003

EOD S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 25 B3-0050

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza B2 298 B2-0001

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza B2 351 B2-0002

Riot Squad S FFL Lower Plaza B2 321 B2-0045

Emir Security Escorts Welfare Room S FFL Plaza PL 90 PL-0017

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0239

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0249

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0277

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0278

Fire Control Center S FFL Plaza PL 93 PL-0106

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 24 PL-0277

FF access S FFL Plaza PL 24 PL-0278

Fire Tank S FFL Plaza Plant P1 23 P1-0010


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

To include the following: vehicle queue, vehicle screening area, oversized vehicle screening area, by-pass lane, observation
31.09 Total_Remote search park / vehicle screening P 32
platform, security area (work & break area for screening personnel), material transfer area, toilets, lighting, vehicle permit check.

Precinct Control Room P Security Compound (Overlay) 32

Vehicle search/screening area (VSA) P

Ambulance parking P

31.13 Total_Stewards’ holding area 3261 Rest area required for stewards working at the stadium. Area to include lockers, toilets and sanitary facilities, F&B facilities, etc.

Next to Ceremonies Compound


Stewards’ Changing Facility P 800
(Precinct)
Next to Ceremonies Compound
Stewards’ Changing Facility P 1200
(Precinct)
Stewards Staff Office S FFL Lower Plaza B2 346 B2-0053

Stewards Changing Area S FFL Lower Plaza B2 107 B2-0062

Stewards Staff Office S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0077

Stewards Staff Office S FFL Lower Plaza B2 257 B2-0078

Stewards Changing Area S FFL Lower Plaza B2 505 B2-0129

Total_Other Security Services 2653

Kitchen S FFL Lower Plaza PL 8 PL-0270

Kitchen S FFL Lower Plaza PL 7 PL-0012

Security Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza PL 41 PL-0071

Kitchen S FFL Lower Plaza PL 8 PL-0270

Emir Safe Room S FFL Plaza Plant P1 59 PL-0020

Commander Office S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 30 02-0141

Emiri Guard Room S FFL Emir EM 52 EM-0020

Ablution Area S FFL 02 Plant P2 10 P2-0047

Ablution Area S FFL 02 Plant P2 10 P2-0048

Pantry S FFL 02 Plant P2 6 P2-0026

Pray Room Female S FFL 02 Plant P2 13 P2-0025

Pray Room Male S FFL 02 Plant P2 12 P2-0034

Secure Stage and Print Room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 18 02-0154

Small Breakfast Room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 28 02-0156

Medical Room S FFL Emir (EM) EM 30 EM-0018

VOC S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 86 02-0009


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

VOC S FFL 02 Plant P2 83 P2-0012

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 23 B1-0007

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 33 B1-0008

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 23 B1-0010

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0112

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0113

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0116

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 23 B2-0117

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 21 B2-0118

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0124

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 23 B2-0121

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 23 B3-0211

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 26 B3-0214

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 23 B3-0218

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 23 PL-0281

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 21 PL-0282

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 23 PL-0284

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 17 PL-0285

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 17 PL-0288

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 23 PL-0289

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0292

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 23 PL-0294

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL VIP Lounge VP 25 VP-0018

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL VIP Lounge VP 23 VP-0027

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL VIP Lounge VP 23 VP-0028

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Emir (EM) EM 25 EM-0027

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 17 P1-0004

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 23 P1-0005

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 23 P1-0006

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 17 P1-0007

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 17 P1-0008

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 23 P1-0009


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Plaza Plant P1 17 P1-0011

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0181

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0182

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21 01-0183

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0187

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0193

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 25 01-0196

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0197

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0198

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0201

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 01-0202

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 17 02-0189

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 15 02-0190

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 21 02-0191

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 24 02-0196

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 17 02-0197

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 17 02-0200

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 24 02-0201

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 25 02-0204

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 24 02-0206

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 17 02-0207

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 17 P2-0046

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 P2-0047

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 21 P2-0048

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 P2-0049

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 17 P2-0050

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 17 P2-0051

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 P2-0052

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 25 P2-0053

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 P2-0055

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 17 P2-0056

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0277


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 23 03-0278

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 21 03-0279

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 23 03-0283

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0284

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0287

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 23 03-0288

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 25 03-0292

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 23 03-0293

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 3 17 03-0294

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 8 P3-0015

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 23 P3-0016

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 23 P3-0017

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 8 P3-0018

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 8 P3-0019

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 23 P3-0020

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 23 P3-0021

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 8 P3-0022

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 23 P4-0023

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 21 P4-0024

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 25 P4-0027

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 23 P4-0028

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 23 04-0196

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 21 04-0197

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 23 04-0204

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 23 04-0205

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 25 04-0209

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 23 04-0211

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 7 03-0326

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 7 03-0327

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 11 P5-0042

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 11 P5-0043

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 11 P5-0044


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Fire Fighter Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 11 P5-0045

Air-Lock Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 25 02-0153

Air-Lock Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 74 02-0157

Air-Lock Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 12 02-0159

Air-Lock Lobby S FFL 02 Plant P2 13 P2-0030

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 10 B3-0215

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 8 02-0194

Corridor S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 7 02-0205

Spectators checkpoints near every entry point P Security Compound (Precinct) 8.1.10

Conference Room S FFL 02 Plant P2 26 P2-0028

Doping Control Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 8.2.1.1 B3-0083

Doping Control Waiting Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 8.2.1.2 B3-0081

Non FIFA Department Rooms (included in the


proposed design)

Total_Corridor 3233

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 81 B3-0141

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0142

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 35 B3-0149

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 65 B3-0150

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 62 B3-0151

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 63 B3-0152

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 64 B3-0153

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 7 B3-0156

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 7 B3-0157

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 57 B3-0159

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 55 B3-0160

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 168 B3-0162

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0188

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 B3-0189

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 118 B3-0192


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 67 B3-0193

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 58 B3-0194

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 15 B3-0195

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 79 B3-0196

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 78 B3-0197

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 17 B3-0198

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 16 B3-0200

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 97 B3-0201

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 16 B3-0202

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 17 B3-0203

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 16 B3-0204

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 99 B3-0205

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 16 B3-0206

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 B3-0208

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza West B3 31 B3-0244

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 87 B2-0084

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 24 B2-0085

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 12 B2-0086

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 167 B2-0087

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 45 B2-0088

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0089

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 7 B2-0090

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 8 B2-0091

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 22 B2-0092

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 53 B2-0093

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 7 B2-0094

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 44 B2-0095

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 8 B2-0096

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 12 B2-0097

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 169 B2-0098


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 87 B2-0099

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 26 B2-0101

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 28 B2-0102

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 198 B2-0103

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 25 B2-0104

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 26 B2-0105

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 32 B2-0106

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 198 B2-0107

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 31 B2-0108

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 26 B2-0109

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 31 B2-0110

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 33 B2-0111

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza B2 31 B2-0126

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 47 B1-0003

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 16 B1-0004

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 16 B1-0005

Corridor FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 47 B1-0006

Players' tunnel FFL Lower Plaza West B3 138 B3-0158

Total_Plant Areas 42599

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Plaza PL 17

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Plaza PL 16

Primary technical area (PTA) 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 214 10.1.1.1 B2-0029

Primary technical area (PTA) 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2

Telcommunications Carrier Room (TCR)

Telcommunications Carrier Room (TCR) 29 P2-0005


Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 29 P2-0007
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 29 P2-0010
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 14 01-0010
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 P2-0017
shared with Stadium Operator
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /


S FFL 02 Plant P2 14 01-0012
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 P2-0019
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 23 01-0013
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23 01-0019
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21 01-0043
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14 01-0104
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14 01-0105
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL Hospitality Club 1 17 P2-0020
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 17 P2-0022
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 29 P2-0045
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 02 Plant P2 20 P3-0001
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 20 P3-0002
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 20 P3-0003
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 20 P3-0004
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 21 P4-0001
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 21 P4-0002
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 21 P4-0003
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 21 P4-0004
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 18 P5-0005
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 04 Plant P5 18 P5-0014
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 04 Plant P5 18 P5-0021
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 04 Plant P5 18 P5-0027
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S FFL 04 Plant P5
shared with Stadium Operator
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Stadium /
S 27 02-0137
dedicated to FIFA IT
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Broadcast
S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 5
Compound
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Broadcast
OP Broadcast Compound (Precinct) 24
Compound
Secondary technical areas (STA) in SMC OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 10
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Accreditation
P Accreditation Centre (Precinct) 10
Centre
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Ticketing
P Ticketing Centre (Precinct) 5
Centre
Secondary technical areas (STA) in Technology
IT&T Compound (Precinct)
compound
Secondary technical areas (STA) in IT Command
Centre
Secondary technical areas (STA) on the pitch
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Secondary technical areas (STA) in Media Tribunes

Secondary technical areas (STA) on the catwalk

Secondary technical areas (STA) - Legacy 5

Local technical areas (LTA) in the Volunteer Centre P Volunteer Centre (Precinct)

IT Command Centre

IT Command Centre 1547

IT technology compound IT&T Compound (Precinct) 65

IT management office IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

IT meeting room / break room IT&T Compound (Precinct) 75

IT support office IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

IT reception and support desk IT&T Compound (Precinct) 12

Radios office IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

Regulation Telecommunications offices IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

FIFA IT solution storage IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

LOC IT storage IT&T Compound (Precinct) 25

Telecommunications provider 1 storage IT&T Compound (Precinct) 12

Telecommunications provider 2 storage IT&T Compound (Precinct)

CATV Support

CATV storage

Technical services storage

Power Generator Area

Radios 10

Technical room in Hospitality villages Hospitality Villages (Precinct) 9

Streetbox Broadcast compound OP/P Broadcast Compound (Precinct) 2

Streetbox commercial display Spectator Plaza (Precinct)

Cellular mobile stations

Cellular mobile stations

Telcommunications Carrier Room 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 74

Telcommunications Carrier Room 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 91

STA/PAVA S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 39

STA/PAVA S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 40

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 22

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 29

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 29

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 29

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 17

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14

STA S FFL 02 Plant (P2) P2 17

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 23

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 21

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14

STA S FFL Hospitality Club 1 14

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 17

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 17

STA S FFL 02 Plant P2 29

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17

MoI/ Emir STA S FFL Plaza PL 22

MoI/ Emir STA S FFL Plaza PL 31

STA S FFL Plaza PL 25

STA S FFL Plaza PL 26

Pressurisation Fan Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19

Support Kitchen S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 65 02-0036

Support Kitchen S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 65 02-0056

Support Kitchen S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 65 02-0108

Support Kitchen S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 65 02-0111

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 23 P5-0031

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 41 P5-0033

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 41 P5-0034

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 41 P5-0036

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 41 P5-0037

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 23 P5-0045


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 21 P5-0048

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 21 P5-0051

Corridor S FFL 04 Plant P5 21 P5-0054

Electrical Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 22 P3-0005

Electrical Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 22 P3-0006

Electrical Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 22 P3-0007

Electrical Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 22 P3-0008

Emergency Lighting Battery Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0006

Emergency Lighting Battery Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0015

Emergency Lighting Battery Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0022

Emergency Lighting Battery Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0028

EMES/ERES S FFL 04 Plant P5 32 P5-0038

EMES/ERES S FFL 04 Plant P5 32 P5-0039

EMES/ERES S FFL 04 Plant P5 32 P5-0040

EMES/ERES S FFL 04 Plant P5 13 P5-0041

FoP Flood Light S FFL 04 Plant P5 53 P5-0007

FoP Flood Light S FFL 04 Plant P5 53 P5-0016

FoP Flood Light S FFL 04 Plant P5 53 P5-0023

FoP Flood Light S FFL 04 Plant P5 530 P5-0029

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0042

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0043

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 1 P5-0044

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0046

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0047

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0049

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0050

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0052

Lobby S FFL 04 Plant P5 3 P5-0053

Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 10 B3-0216

Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 54 B1-0011

Lobby S FFL VIP Lounge VP 28 VP-0019

Lobby S FFL Emir EM 28 EM-0028


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0218

Fire Control Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 30 04-0214

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 56 P4-0005

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 56 P4-0006

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 56 P4-0007

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 56 P4-0008

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0004

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0013

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0020

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 17 P5-0026

PAVA Plant Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 45 P5-0008

PAVA Plant Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 45 P5-0017

PAVA Plant Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 45 P5-0024

PAVA Plant Room S FFL 04 Plant P5 45 P5-0030

Stewards Changing Area Plant S FFL Lower Plaza B2 106 B2-0079

S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 988 B1-0002

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 83 03-0131

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 115 03-0132

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 83 03-0133

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 83 03-0134

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 83 03-0135

Plant S FFL Upper Tier 3 115 03-0136

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 2148 P3-0017

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 240 P3-0013

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 240 P3-0014

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 240 P3-0015

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 2148 P3-0018

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 1 P3 240 P3-0016

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 997 P4-0009

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 999 P4-0010

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 107 P5-0001

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 876 P5-0002


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 876 P5-0009

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 107 P5-0010

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 201 P5-0011

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 201 P5-0012

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 201 P5-0018

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 101 P5-0019

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 101 P5-0025

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 201 P5-0032

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 101 P5-0035

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 109 P5-0055

Plant S FFL 04 Plant P5 109 P5-0056

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza B2 137 B2-0044

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza B2 138 B2-0076

Plant S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 997 P4-0009

Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 54 B3-0213

Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 6 B2-0114

Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 6 B2-0115

Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 6 B2-0122

Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 6 B2-0123

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 586 02-0187

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 48 02-0192

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 74 02-0195

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 587 02-0198

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 55 02-0202

Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 28 02-0203

Lift Lobby S FFL Upper Tier 4 67 04-0202

Lift Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 23 P4-0026

Lift Lobby S FFL 03 Plant 2 P4 23 P4-0025

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 7 B3-0217

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Lower Plaza B2 60 B2-0120

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Plaza PL 25 PL-0291

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL VIP Lounge VP 54 VP-0017


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 7 01-0180

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 57 01-0184

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 7 01-0188

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 74 01-0191

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 7 01-0192

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 54 01-0194

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 18 01-0195

Serviced Lift Lobby S FFL Hospitality Club 1 7 01-0199

Emergency Lighting S FFL Basement B4 24 B4-0001

Emergency Lighting S FFL Basement B4 24 B4-0002

Emergency Lighting S FFL Basement B4 30 B4-0003

Emergency Lighting S FFL Basement B4 30 B4-0004

Lower Tier and Pitch AHUs S FFL Basement B4 1344 B4-0009

Lower Tier and Pitch AHUs S FFL Basement B4 906 B4-0008

Lower Tier and Pitch AHUs S FFL Basement B4 906 B4-0007

Lower Tier and Pitch AHUs S FFL Basement B4 1346 B4-0010

Lower Tier and Pitch AHUs S FFL Basement B4 1802 B4-0011

Catering Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 13 B3-0110

Cellular Equipment Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 159 B3-0003

Chef Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 4 B3-0119

Cleaning Storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 8 B3-0109

Cold Holding S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 88 B3-0128

Cold Kitchen S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 38 B3-0117

Concession Cash Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 6 B3-0129

Concessions Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 B3-0108

Dairy Chiller S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 26 B3-0099

Decant & Holding Area S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 60 B3-0074

Dish Wash S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 66 B3-0124

Dish Wash S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 39 B3-0140

Dry Store S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 32 B3-0047

Equipment & Disposable Store S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 12 B3-0111

Equipment Store S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 35 B3-0100


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 100 B3-0017

Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 75 B3-0020

Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 99 B3-0182

Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 75 B3-0185

Essential MV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 45 B3-0008

Essential MV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 45 B3-0173

Fish Prep S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 26 B3-0120

Fruit & Veg Prep S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 39 B3-0123

Generator S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 87 B3-0186

Hot Kitchen S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 143 B3-0116

Life Safety LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 69 B3-0011

Life Safety LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 69 B3-0176

Loading Area S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 20 B3-0038

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 37 B3-0023

Meat Prep S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 41 B3-0122

MoI Communication Network Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 142 B3-0002

Non Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 115 B3-0016

Non Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 115 B3-0181

Non Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 47 B3-0007

Non Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 47 B3-0172

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 46 B3-0049

Portioning S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 22 B3-0118

POS Store & Repair S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 10 B3-0112

Pot Wash S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 69 B3-0101

Poultry Prep S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 40 B3-0121

Prayer Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 7 B3-0103

Prayer Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 6 B3-0170

Receiving Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 8 B3-0107

Staff Changing S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 48 B3-0104

Staff Resting S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 B3-0102

Standby Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 74 B3-0019

Standby Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 74 B3-0184


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Standby Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 52 B3-0018

Standby Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 52 B3-0183

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 B3-0009

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 21 B3-0014

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19 B3-0015

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 B3-0174

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 21 B3-0179

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19 B3-0180

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 33 B3-0010

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 33 B3-0012

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 32 B3-0013

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 33 B3-0175

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 33 B3-0177

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 32 B3-0178

Trolley Wash & Park S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 44 B3-0125

VIP Cold Holding S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 21 B3-0126

VIP Finishing S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 26 B3-0127

Chilled Water S FFL Lower Plaza B2 51 B2-0056

Emergency Lighting S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0038

Emergency Lighting S FFL Lower Plaza B2 17 B2-0081

Essential LV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 85 B2-0024

Essential LV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 50 B2-0025

Essential LV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 85 B2-0072

Essential LV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 50 B2-0073

Essential MV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0022

Essential MV Switch Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 29 B2-0071

Generator S FFL Lower Plaza B2 62 B2-0028

Generator S FFL Lower Plaza B2 62 B2-0042

Life Safety LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 65 B2-0023

Life Safety LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 65 B2-0040

Non Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 142 B2-0014

Non Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 141 B2-0033


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Non Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 72 B2-0015

Non Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 72 B2-0034

Radio Equipment Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 101 B2-0013

Standby Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0027

Standby Essential LV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0074

Standby Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 55 B2-0026

Standby Essential MV Switchroom S FFL Lower Plaza B2 55 B2-0041

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 34 B2-0016

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 29 B2-0017

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0018

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 34 B2-0035

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0068

Transformers 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 49 B2-0069

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 45 B2-0019

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 45 B2-0020

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 56 B2-0021

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 46 B2-0036

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 56 B2-0037

Transformers 2 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 45 B2-0070

Beverage Store S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 61 B3-0098

Concessions Store 1 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 B3-0113

Concessions Store 2 S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 32 B3-0114

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 B3-0155

Corridor S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 5 B3-0161

Freezer S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 4 B3-0048

Freezer S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 20 B3-0105

Generator S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 87 B3-0021

Groundskeeper Facilities S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 351 B3-0001

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 37 B3-0032

MOI Engineer Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 50 B3-0163

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza Mezzanine B1 859 B1-0001

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 190 B3-0046


Regquired Location Stadium Precinct

Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 25 B3-0132

Plant S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 487 B3-0164

Pressurisation Fan Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 19 B3-0031

Raw Wash S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 10 B3-0106

Energy Transfer Station S FFL Lower Plaza B2 1574 B2-0030

Energy Transfer Station S FFL Lower Plaza B2 1571 B2-0047

Fire Pump S FFL Lower Plaza B2 232 B2-0128

Fire Tank S FFL Lower Plaza B2 366 B2-0005

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 37 B2-0046

LV Sub-Distribution Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 37 B2-0083

Maintenance Workshop S FFL Lower Plaza B2 37 B2-0043

Maintenance Workshop S FFL Lower Plaza B2 37 B2-0065

Potable/Non-Potable Tank Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 1111 B2-0004

Potable/Non-Potable Tank Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 455 B2-0054

Pressurisation Fan Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 19 B2-0011

Pressurisation Fan Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 19 B2-0080

Sprinkler Tank Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 1022 B2-0006

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 19 B2-0125

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 22 B2-0127

STA S FFL Lower Plaza B2 19 B2-0130

Concourse - GA Lower tier - East S FFL Plaza PL 20 PL-0244

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 15 PL-0214

Corridor S FFL Plaza PL 10 PL-0215

Disabled Toilets S FFL Plaza PL 4 PL-0132


Mobile operators telecommunications Next to Broadcast Compound
S 1600
tower compound (Precinct)
Within Security Compound
MOI telecommunication tower compound S 1600
(Precinct)
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-2 VE of Structural Engineering and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 304
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-3 VE of Plumbing and Code Compliance

A-3.1 Plumbing System Required Plant Spaces and Floor Plans

A-3.2 Preliminary Water and Sewage Demand Estimate

A-3.3 Precinct Mains Potable Water Demands Table

A-3.4 Plumbing Schematics and Floor Plans (Mark Ups)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 305
 

A3 – VE OF PLUMBING (REQUIRED PLANT


SPACES & FLOOR PLANS)
PROJECT NUMBER : 5044 

PROJECT TITLE : LUSAIL STADIUM PROJECT

SUBJECT: PLUMBING SYSTEM (  REQUIRED PLANT SPACES )  BASED ON CURRENT & VE OPTION DESIGNS  

BASED ON CURRENT DESIGN BASED ON VE OPTION DESIGN

ITEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION TAG REF. LPS/HEAD M3 TYPE AREA SERVED LOCATION POWER  POWER 


TOTAL  TOTAL 
LEVEL (L x W) AREA(M2) QTY REQUREMENT( LEVEL (L x W) AREA(M2) QTY REQUREMENT( REMARKS
AREA(M2) AREA(M2)
KW) KW)

 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER 
1 SATELLITE CONDENSATE WATER TANK WT 6 GRP
SUPPLY
PLANT RING
Due to HVAC load reduction as 
B1/B2/B4 6m x 4m 24 20 480 15 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 5m x 3m 15 10 150 10
part of VE.
 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER 
2 CONDENSATE RECYCLING BOOSTER PUMP SETS CDPS N/A
SUPPLY
PLANT RING

3 FOUL WATER SUMP PUMP SETS FWPS N/A FOUL SEWERAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2 8m x 7m 56 10 560 25 6m x 5m 30 10 300 20


LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH)

4 PITCH SURFACE WATER PUMPING STATION SWPS N/A PLANT RING B2 9m x 8m 72 1 72 21 8m x7m 56 1 56 21

MAIN KITCHEN AREA/DRESSING 
5 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
ROOMS,ETC.
PLANT ROOM PLANTS(P1) 8m x 6m 48 2 96 600 7m x 5m 35 2 70 540
LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH)

6 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A FIELD OF PLAY(CHANGING AREA) PLANT ROOM B1/B3 8m x 4m 32 4 128 100 6m x 4m 24 2 48 80

7 N/A

8 POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK WT‐B2‐01 1800 CONCRETE DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PLANT ROOM


Potable water storage tank 
capacity still to be confirmed due 
9 POTABLE WATER BOOSTER PUMP SETS WBS‐01 N/A DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PLANT ROOM B2 55m x 20m 1100 1 1100 65 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 55m x 20m 1100 1 1100 50 to new occupancy requirement. 
Refer to Stage ‐ Design Analysis 
Table. 
POTABLE WATER STORAGE 
10 WATER TREATMENT PLANT WTP N/A
TANK
PLANT ROOM

DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY AND 
11 NON ‐ POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK WT‐02 1200 CONCRETE
PITCH IRRIGATION
PLANT ROOM
Non‐potable water storage tank 
capacity still to be confirmed due 
12 NON  ‐POTABLE WATER BOOSTER PUMP SETS WBS‐02 N/A DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PLANT ROOM B2 35m X 20m 700 1 700 114 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 35m x 20m 700 1 700 100 to new occupancy requirement. 
Refer to Stage ‐ Design Analysis 
Table. 
NON ‐ POTABLE WATER 
13 WATER TREATMENT PLANT WTP N/A
STORAGE TANK
PLANT ROOM

 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER 
14 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER STORAGE TANK WT‐03 324 CONCRETE
SUPPLY
PLANT ROOM

 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER  B2 20m X 20m 400 1 400 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 20m X 20m 400 1 400 22


15 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER BOOSTER PUMP SETS(2 NOS.) WBS‐03 N/A
SUPPLY
PLANT ROOM 30

 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER 
16 WATER TREATMENT PLANT WTP N/A
SUPPLY
PLANT ROOM

ZONE ALLOCATED AS FUTURE PLANT ALLOWANCE TO ACCOMMODATE PLANT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE 
17 ALTERNATIVE RECYCLED WATER SOURCES IN LINE WITH CLIENT WATER STRATEGY.
FUTURE PROVISION PLANT ROOM B2 20m x 20m 400 1 400 110 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 20m x 20m 400 1 400 110

18 N/A

19 BACK OF WALL DRAINAGE SUMP BWDS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2 8m x 7m 56 4 224 20 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 8m x 7m 56 4 224 20

20 DRAINAGE SUMP PUMP DS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2/B4 5m x 4m 20 12 240 30 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 5m x 4m 20 6 120 25

21 LIFT SUMP PUMP LSP N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM LIFT AREA  B2 6 6 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 6 4

22 FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUMP PUMP LPS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2 8m x 7m 56 6 336 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 8m x 7m 56 6 336 Part of FP

Potable Water Distribution 
23 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM B3/B1 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30

4800 3952

Potable Water Distribution  EMIR  LEVEL ‐ 1 ( 


24 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM
PLANTROOM
8m x 4m 32 2 64 35
CONCOURSE/PLAZA)
6m x 4m 24 2 48 30

Potable Water Distribution  EMIR  LEVEL ‐ 1 ( 


25 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM
PLANTROOM
8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE/PLAZA)
6m x 6m 42 4 168 65
256 216

LEVEL ‐ 
Potable Water Distribution 
26 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P1) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 2(HOSPITALITY/VVIP/VI 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
P)

LEVEL ‐ 
Potable Water Distribution 
27 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P1) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 2(HOSPITALITY/VVIP/VI 6m x 4m 24 4 96 65
P)

256 144

LEVEL ‐ 3(SKY 
Potable Water Distribution 
28 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 BOXES/HOSPITALITY/V 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
VIP/VIP)

LEVEL ‐ 3(SKY 
Potable Water Distribution 
29 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 BOXES/HOSPITALITY/V 6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
VIP/VIP)

256 192

Potable Water Distribution 
30 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 LEVEL ‐ 4(PLANT) 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30

Potable Water Distribution 
31 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 LEVEL ‐ 4(PLANT) 6m x 6m 36 4 144 65

256 192

Potable Water Distribution  LEVEL ‐ 5 (UPPER 
32 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 1)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65

Potable Water Distribution  LEVEL ‐ 6 (UPPER 
33 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 2)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65

Potable Water Distribution  LEVEL ‐ 7 (UPPER 
34 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 3)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65

ROOF AREA(CLEANING 
35 ROOF CLEANING TANK AND PUMP ROOM N/A
PURPOSES)
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P5) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 30 LEVEL ‐ 8 (PLANT) 6m x 6m 36 4 144 25

Note: These reductions in area for 
spaces and power requirements 
under VE option design are 
6592 1866 5272 1632 approximately based on the 20% 
reduced area made for VE 
design(173,147 m2) against 
current design(212,328 m2). 
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-0, Pitch

22 3 3
20 Electrical Spaces
19
ELV Spaces

STA
STA
HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces
ns
tio
ica PTA 1
un r
m rie
lc om Car om
Te Ro 1
Fire Fighting
1/2 3 1/2 23 1/2 20 1/2 spaces

3
Vertical Circulation
1/2 1/2
20 5 SECURITY
CONTROL
Service Tunnel
ROOM

Tank STA
Fire
fighting
Pump Emergency
room Tank
1/2 1/2 Lighting

STA

Emergency
Lighting

Plumbing

19 / Fire
fighting
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
1/2 1/2
3 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 (3x)
Plumbing Plumbing Radio
/ Fire / Fire Equipment

22 fighting fighting Room

22 22
3
19
1/2 1/2
4
Emergency
Lighting
STA

STA
Emergency
Lighting
1/2 1/2
22
6 22
20 5 FIRE
COMMAND
CENTER

CAR Room

1/2 1/2

Te
lco
1/2 24 1/2 23 1/2 1/2
20 m
m
Ca un
Ro rrie icat
o r ion
2 m s
PTA
2

Cellular
Equipment
Room
CNR
(MoI) STA
STA

20
22 19

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-1, Concourse

Electrical Spaces
STA
STA
Electrical Electrical

ELV Spaces

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

24 25 25 24
Electrical Electrical STA
STA

STA STA
Electrical Electrical

25 25

Elect
rical rical
Elect

STA STA

GIA: 14970 m2

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-2, Hospitality

Electrical Spaces

Electrical Electrical
ELV Spaces

VENUE
OPERATION
CENTER HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

Vertical Circulation

Service Tunnel

27
Electrical
STA 27 Electrical STA

26

26

STA
27 STA

27
Electrical Electrical

Elect
rical rical
Elect

GIA :14250 m2

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-3, Skyboxes VVIP

Electrical Spaces
STA
STA
Electrical Electrical

ELV Spaces

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

28 29

Electrical Electrical

29

29
Electrical Electrical

28 29

Elect
rical rical
Elect

STA STA

GIA:11284 m2

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-4, Plant

Electrical Spaces

Electrical
VOC
Electrical ELV Spaces
SUPPORT
FACILITY

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

Electrical Electrical

Emergency
Lighting
31 31 Emergency
Lighting

30 30

Emergency
Lighting
31 31 Emergency
Lighting

Electrical Electrical

Elect
rical rical
Elect

GIA: 4888 m2

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-5, Upper Concourse 1

Electrical Electrical
Electrical Spaces

ELV Spaces

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

Electrical Electrical STA


STA

32 32

32 32
STA STA
Electrical Electrical

Elect
rical rical
Elect

GIA: 16702 m2

0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-6, upper Concourse 2

Electrical Spaces

ELV Spaces

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

Vertical Circulation

Service Tunnel

33 33
STA STA

Electrical Electrical

Electrical
Electrical

STA STA

33 33

GIA: 6593 m2
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-7, Upper Concourse 3

Electrical Spaces

By Department
ELV Spaces Legend
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

Vertical Circulation

Service Tunnel

STA STA

Electrical Electrical

34 34

34 34

Electrical
Electrical

STA STA

GIA: 4065 m2
Sketch #

MEP Space Planning


Level-8, Plant

Electrical Spaces

ELV Spaces

HVAC Spaces

Plumbing Spaces

Fire Fighting
spaces

35 35
Radio Radio

Electrical Electrical

Lighting Lighting
Control Control
Room Room

Sketch Space
MEP
Level-0,
# Pitch
Planning

Electrical
ELV
HVAC Spaces
Spaces
Spaces

Plumbing
Fire
spaces
Fighting
Spaces

Vertical Tunnel
Service Circulation

Lighting Lighting
Control Control
Room Room

Electrical
Electrical

Radio Radio

35 35
PROJECT LUSAIL STADIUM Sheet No 3 Rev 1

ROOF STORMWATER PIPE SIZE & RUNOFF CALCULATIONS-


ITEM C4710(Vertical drain based on 50 years return period)-VE By Date 5-Jan-16
DESIGN

Qatar Office RFS 5044 Checked By Date

1. The roof drain and vertical pipe sizing is in accordance with IPC 2006, table 1106.2 and primary storm drain considered in the calculation.
 in accordance with IDF curves at Doha International Airport for 50 years @ 15 minutes duration.
2. The runoff calculations for roof is in accordance with ASPE handbook  using the formula below :
Q = CIA/(1000 x 3600)
Where:
Q = Runoff in m³/s A = Total Roof Area ,m²
C = Runoff coefficient=0.95 for roof 1000 = Conversion factor, mm to meters
I = Rainfall intensity, mm/hr from IDF Curve 3600 = Conversion factor, hours to seconds
PIPE SIZE AND RUNOFF CALCULATION TABLE BASED ON 100 YEARS RETURN PERIOD

Vertical Pipe & Projected Area Capacities (IPC, Table 1106.2)
Runoff, m³/s

(A) Roof Projected  (1) Numbers of Roof Drain 
Location (I) Rainfall intensity,  Duration,  Remarks
Area, m² Used(Primary ) (3)Area Capacity  (B)Total Area Capacity  Velocity of 
(2) Dia, mm mm/hr from IDF  minutes from  Total Flow(Q) Flow per VL
per VL, m² of VL Used,  m² = (1) x(3) pipe/VL     (m/s)
curve IDF curve

Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐1 design. 

Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐2 design. 
Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐3 design. 
PROJECT
LUSAIL STADIUM
DOCUMENT ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND(BASED ON VE DESIGN) 2016-06-30
Qatar Office

5044
RFS 30-Jun-16

OPTION 2 : WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND ESTIMATION(BASED ON GROSS FLOOR AREA )

Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Program Number of Occupants
Level SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
Group per IBC

Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM) Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM)

0 37,658 3,423 60 205,380 164,304


PLAYERS/FOP
1 15,171 1,379 60 82,740 66,192
LOWER CONCOURSE
2 14,608 1,328 60 79,680 63,744
HOSPITALITY & VIP
3 11,698 1,063 60 63,780 51,024
SKYBOX & VVIP
4 5,912 200 60 12,000 9,600
PLANT TBD & CORES
5 17,581 1,598 60 95,880 76,704
UPPER CONCOURSE 1
6 6,951 632 15 9,480 7,584
UPPER CONCOURSE 2
7 4,423 402 60 24,120 19,296
UPPER CONCOURSE 3
8 4,216 50 60 3,000 2,400
PLANT TBD

118,218 10,075 576,060 460,848

Total Fresh Domestic Water 576 m3 461 1 DAY

2 DAYS(60% Potable &


1,152
40% Non-potable)

Irrigation N/A m3 Condensate Recovery

HVAC Make Up(Central Plant # 1) N/A m3 District Cooling

Fire Water Reserve N/A m3 Refer to FP design

Note: Tank size per VE of 1,152 m3 as estimated above is lesser by 30% than the
current design of 1,720 m3.
Initials Division

Design
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - VE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev

ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Potable cold water supply) By Date

Qatar Office RFS 5044 Checked By KT Date

A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.

PROBABLE WATER FLOW RATES(POTABLE WATER SUPPLY)


Cold Water Supply Feed System
Quantity per floor Table E 103.3 (2) Load Values for Fixture Unit Total Fixture Units / Appliances
Total Fixture Table E Gravity Booster
Units 103.3 (2)
Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal, Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Total Table E Total Table E
Conversion
Item No. Description AREA(M2) Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Flush Valve Sink Closet, 2 basin sink Spray or Machine Sink Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Sink
to Design
Fixture 103.3 (2) Fixture 103.3 (2) Remarks
Bidet for Flush Bidet Bidet Units Design Units Design
Flow Rate,
Tank, 5 for Flow Rate, Flow Rate,
L/s
Flush Valve L/s L/s

1 PLAYERS/FOP 37658 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 22.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 105.00 2.80 - - 105.00 2.80 Flush Valves

LOWER
2 15171 0 20 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 130.00 3.30 - - 130.00 3.30 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE

HOSPITALITY &
3 14608 0 20 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 170.00 3.70 - - 170.00 3.70 Flush Valves
VIP

4 SKYBOX & VVIP 11698 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 67.00 2.40 - - 67.00 2.40 Flush Valves

5 PLANT & CORES 5912 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 61.50 2.00 - - 61.50 2.00 Flush Valves

UPPER
6 17581 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 70.00 2.20 - - 70.00 2.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 1

UPPER
7 6951 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 65.00 2.30 - - 65.00 2.30 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 2

UPPER
8 4423 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 64.00 2.20 - - 64.00 2.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 3

9 PLANT 4216 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 21.00 1.30 - - 21.00 1.30 Flush Valves

118218 Total for item 1 to 8 753.50 0.00 22.20

Sub-total 22.20
Add 10% Allowance 24.42

Total 24.42 L/S

Comments

Initials Division Office


JA D&P Doha
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - VE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev

ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Non-potable cold water supply) By Date

Qatar Office RFS 5044 Checked By KT Date

A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.

PROBABLE WATER FLOW RATES(NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLY)


Cold Water Supply Feed System
Quantity per floor Table E 103.3 (2) Load Values for Fixture Unit Total Fixture Units / Appliances
Total Fixture Table E Gravity Booster
Units 103.3 (2)
Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal, Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Total Table E Total Table E
Conversion
Item No. Description AREA(M2) Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Flush Valve Sink Closet, 2 basin sink Spray or Machine Sink Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Sink
to Design
Fixture 103.3 (2) Fixture 103.3 (2) Remarks
Bidet for Flush Bidet Bidet Units Design Units Design
Flow Rate,
Tank, 5 for Flow Rate, Flow Rate,
L/s
Flush Valve L/s L/s

1 PLAYERS/FOP 37658 100 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.50 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 650.00 9.40 - - 650.00 9.40 Flush Valves

LOWER
2 15171 50 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 337.00 5.50 - - 337.00 5.50 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE

HOSPITALITY &
3 14608 30 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 240.00 4.60 - - 240.00 4.60 Flush Valves
VIP

4 SKYBOX & VVIP 11698 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 190.00 4.20 - - 190.00 4.20 Flush Valves

5 PLANT & CORES 5912 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 92.50 2.40 - - 92.50 2.40 Flush Valves

UPPER
6 17581 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 190.00 4.20 - - 190.00 4.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 1

UPPER
7 6951 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 125.00 3.40 - - 125.00 3.40 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 2

UPPER
8 4423 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 112.00 3.20 - - 112.00 3.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 3

9 PLANT 4216 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 33.00 1.40 - - 33.00 1.40 Flush Valves

245

118218 Total for item 1 to 8 1969.50 0.00 38.30

Sub-total 38.30
Add 10% Allowance 42.13

Total 42.13 L/S

Comments

Initials Division Office


JA D&P Doha
PROJECT
LUSAIL STADIUM
DOCUMENT ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND(BASED ON VE DESIGN) 2016-06-30
Qatar Office

5044
RFS 30-Jun-16

OPTION 2 : WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND ESTIMATION(BASED ON GROSS FLOOR AREA )

Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Program Number of Occupants
Level SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
Group per IBC

Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM) Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM)

0 37,658 3,423 60 205,380 164,304


PLAYERS/FOP
1 15,171 1,379 60 82,740 66,192
LOWER CONCOURSE
2 14,608 1,328 60 79,680 63,744
HOSPITALITY & VIP
3 11,698 1,063 60 63,780 51,024
SKYBOX & VVIP
4 5,912 200 60 12,000 9,600
PLANT TBD & CORES
5 17,581 1,598 60 95,880 76,704
UPPER CONCOURSE 1
6 6,951 632 15 9,480 7,584
UPPER CONCOURSE 2
7 4,423 402 60 24,120 19,296
UPPER CONCOURSE 3
8 4,216 50 60 3,000 2,400
PLANT TBD

118,218 10,075 576,060 460,848

Total Fresh Domestic Water 576 m3 461 1 DAY

2 DAYS(60% Potable &


1,152
40% Non-potable)

Irrigation N/A m3 Condensate Recovery

HVAC Make Up(Central Plant # 1) N/A m3 District Cooling

Fire Water Reserve N/A m3 Refer to FP design

Note: Tank size per VE of 1,152 m3 as estimated above is lesser by 30% than the
current design of 1,720 m3.
Initials Division

Design
PROJECT LUSAIL STADIUM Sheet No 3 Rev 1

ROOF STORMWATER PIPE SIZE & RUNOFF CALCULATIONS-


ITEM C4710(Vertical drain based on 50 years return period)-VE By Date 5-Jan-16
DESIGN

Qatar Office RFS 5044 Checked By Date

1. The roof drain and vertical pipe sizing is in accordance with IPC 2006, table 1106.2 and primary storm drain considered in the calculation.
 in accordance with IDF curves at Doha International Airport for 50 years @ 15 minutes duration.
2. The runoff calculations for roof is in accordance with ASPE handbook  using the formula below :
Q = CIA/(1000 x 3600)
Where:
Q = Runoff in m³/s A = Total Roof Area ,m²
C = Runoff coefficient=0.95 for roof 1000 = Conversion factor, mm to meters
I = Rainfall intensity, mm/hr from IDF Curve 3600 = Conversion factor, hours to seconds
PIPE SIZE AND RUNOFF CALCULATION TABLE BASED ON 100 YEARS RETURN PERIOD

Vertical Pipe & Projected Area Capacities (IPC, Table 1106.2)
Runoff, m³/s

(A) Roof Projected  (1) Numbers of Roof Drain 
Location (I) Rainfall intensity,  Duration,  Remarks
Area, m² Used(Primary ) (3)Area Capacity  (B)Total Area Capacity  Velocity of 
(2) Dia, mm mm/hr from IDF  minutes from  Total Flow(Q) Flow per VL
per VL, m² of VL Used,  m² = (1) x(3) pipe/VL     (m/s)
curve IDF curve

Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐1 design. 

Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐2 design. 
Stadium(North  11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE 
Stand)‐NRWP‐3 design. 
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-4 VE of Fire Protection and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 306
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

A-5.1 Air Flow Rate Calculation for BOW

A-5.2 Outside & Extract air Calculation

A-5.3 Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
and Psychometric charts (7 Pages)

A-5.4 HVAC Plant Location Sections

A-5.5 HVAC System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design (5
Pages)

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 307
Appendix ‐ A
A‐5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance
A‐5.1, Air Flow Rate Calculation for BOWL 

Proposed New Bowl Area Based on CDF Model Proposed New Bowl Area Based on CDF Model ‐ VE Option ‐ 01 Proposed New Bowl Area Based on CDF Model ‐ VE Option ‐ 02

Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person  Total (L/s) Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person  Total (L/s) Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person  Total (L/s)
(L/s) (L/s) (L/s)

Pitch Cooling' 90000 Pitch Cooling' 90000 Pitch Cooling' 90000

Lower ‐  Tier ‐01 Lower ‐  Tier ‐01 Lower ‐  Tier ‐01


GA 13600 24480 20 489600 GA 13600 24480 10 244800 GA 13600 24480 10 244800
VIP 1230 1353 20 27060 VIP 1230 1353 10 13530 VIP 1230 1353 10 13530
Hosp 2950 5015 20 100300 Hosp 2950 5015 10 50150 Hosp 2950 5015 10 50150
Total 30848 616960 Total 30848 308480 Total 30848 308480

Mid ‐ Tier ‐02 Mid ‐ Tier ‐02 Mid ‐ Tier ‐02


VVIP 300 150 20 3000 VVIP 300 150 20 3000 VVIP 300 150 20 3000
Skyboxes 1650 2145 20 42900 Skyboxes 1650 2145 20 42900 Skyboxes 1650 2145 20 42900
Total 2295 45900 Total 2295 45900 Total 2295 45900

Uppe‐ Tier ‐03 Uppe‐ Tier ‐03 Uppe‐ Tier ‐03


GA 28579 55730 20 1114600 GA 28579 55730 10 557300 GA 28579 55730 0 0
Total 55730 1114600 Total 55730 557300 Total 55730 0

Perimeter Cooling 338800 Perimeter Cooling 338800 Perimeter Cooling 338800

Total People & Air Flow 88873 2206260 Total People & Air Flow 88873 1340480 Total People & Air Flow 88873 783180

The original design is based on summer condition 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in some area due to over design conditions. The 
design checks indicate based on winter condition, we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas the CFD model will be based on 
the 10 L/s per person for lower tier, 20 L/s per person for mid‐tier and no cooling for upper tier.
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.

Appendix - A A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance Job ref.

Calculation Title A-5.2, Outside & Extract air Calculation 0


Calc. by Date Checked By Date Calc.Sheet no./ Rev
MS 29/5/2016 KJ 29/5/2016 Rev-0 M-601 / Rev 0

Outside Air Requirements As per ASHRAE 62.1 2007

Air
Occupants Total Air flow based on Air Rate based Total Total Pantry / Battery Repair Total
Occupancy change Make up General Toilet Total Make up
Sr. Area based on Proposed no. of People on Area Outside Air Proposed Kitchen Room Room Proposed Remarks
Space per 100 m2 per hr air Extract Air Extract Extract Air Outside air
No Arch. Dwg's Occupants Outside Air Extract Air Extract Air Extract Air Extract
Rp Ra Ra+Rp
m² No. No. l/s/p l/s l/s/m2 l/s ACH l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s

1 Floors
00 - Players / FOP 33589.8 30.0 1119.7 3.8 4254.7 0.3 10076.9 14331.6 14331.6

01 - Lower Concourse 14970.0 30.0 499.0 3.8 1896.2 0.6 8982.0 10878.2 10878.2

02 - Hospitality & VIP 14250.5 30.0 475.0 3.8 1805.1 0.6 8550.3 10355.4 10355.4

03 - Skybox & VVIP 11284.3 40.0 282.1 3.8 1072.0 0.6 6770.6 7842.6 7842.6

04 - Plant TBD & cores 4888.0 0.3 1466.4 1466.4 1466.4

05 - Upper Concourse 1 16702.3 30.0 556.7 3.8 2115.6 0.6 10021.4 12137.0 12137.0

06 - Upper Concourse 2 6592.5 30.0 219.8 3.8 835.1 0.6 3955.5 4790.6 4790.6

07 - Upper Concourse 3 4065.0 30.0 135.5 3.8 514.9 0.6 2439.0 2953.9 2953.9

08 - Plant TBD 0.0

TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.4

FOP - Field of Play 10863.0

SB - Stadium Bowl Gen 313.0 0.0

LT - Lower Tier 19145.4 0.0

MT - Middle Tier (Skybox) 2155.7 0.0

UT - Upper Tier 34327.2 0.0

TOTAL FOP & Seating 66804.4 0.0

Total 346293.5 3287.8 64755.6 0.0

Tier - 1
1 Assumed Spectator People 30000.0 3.0 90000.0 90000.0 90000.0

Tier - 2
1 Assumed Spectator People 10000.0 3.0 30000.0 30000.0 30000.0

Tier - 3
1 Assumed Spectator People 50000.0 3.0 150000.0 150000.0 150000.0

Total 90000.0 270000.0


Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.

Appendix - A A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for
Appendix - A
Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for
Calculation Title 16-5044 Calculation Title Preliminary A/C Load 16-5044
Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
Calc. by Date Check by Date Calc sheet no. rev
Calc. by Date Check by Date Calc sheet no. rev
Mani 30/7/2016 KT 30/7/2016 M - 201/R00 MS 30/7/2016 KT 30/7/2016 M - 201

Total A/c Cooling Total A/c Cooling Total Total


Area Qty Total Cooling References/Results Area Qty
Sl. No. Building Reference Area Load Sl. No. Building Reference Area Load Cooling Cooling
M2 Nos. M2 W/m2 kW M2 Nos. M2 W/m2 Kw Kw Deg  T
Total A/c Load Summary
1 Floors
1 Total A/c Load for Building 173147 98 16922.07
(Back and Front of House)
00 - Players / FOP 33589.76 1 33589.8 120.0 4030.8

2 Outside Air Cooling Coil Calculation 3790.67 01 - Lower Concourse 14969.96 1 14970.0 100.0 1497.0
(Back and Front of House)
02 - Hospitality & VIP 14250.48 1 14250.5 120.0 1710.1
3 Play Areas 4742.02
03 - Skybox & VVIP 11284.35 1 11284.3 120.0 1354.1
4 Lower Tier Spactator Cooling 12137.40
04 - Plant TBD & Cores 4888
5 Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP Cooling 1632.33
05 - Upper Concourse 1 16702.33 1 16702.3 100.0 1670.2

7 Upper Tier Perimeter Cooling 12820.10


06 - Upper Concourse 2 6592.506 1 6592.5 100.0 659.3

8 Total Cooling Load 52044.59 07 - Upper Concourse 3 4064.988 1 4065.0 100.0 406.5

08 - Plant TBD 0
9 Total Cooling Load with 5% contingency 54,646.82 Kw

TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.4 11327.93


15537.91 Tons
FOP - Field of Play 10863

Say 60000.00 Kw SB - Stadium Bowl Gen 313 1 313.0 100.0 31.3

LT - Lower Tier 19145.44 1 19145.4 100.0 1914.5


Total Cooling Load for the Buidling say 17000.00 Tons
MT - Middle Tier (Skybox) 2155.714 1 2155.7 100.0 215.6

UT - Upper Tier 34327.23 1 34327.2 100.0 3432.7

TOTAL FOP & Seating 66804.39 5594.139

TOTAL all areas within stadium 173146.77 16922.069

Total Cooling A/c Load 173146.8 16922.1

4811.5 Tons

1 Play areas cooling


Solar Load (150 w/m2 + Open Roof Area) 1100.0
Lighting Load
12 W / m2 x 12000 144.0
People
50 x 250 ( 90 Sen + 160 Lat) 12.5

1256.5

Say 2000.0 Kw

Rev 1 BPG121_F01(Excel)
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. 300.03 3.537 2.566 0.016160 83.33 Enthalpy at ON Coil condition
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load 285.66 1.449 1.415 0.008807 35.36 Enthalpy at OFF Coil condition
Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB 287.45 1.628 1.445 0.008998 39.95
& 27.0WB
Calculation Title Back & Front Of House OA AHU Sizing
Calc. ref. Calc sheet no. rev The calculations have been undertaken to estimate the change in chiled water flow given different efficiencies for the
Calc. by Date Checked by Date heat recovery wheels. The formulas used on the sheet are taken directly from ASHRAE Guide S44.
MS 30/7/2016 30/7/2016 The attached psychometric chart indicates the relative difference in efficiency and also identifies the location for some of
Back & Front Of House OA AHU Sizing the readings that have to be completed on these excel calculation sheets.
UNIT REFERENCE :
LOCATION : The electric reheat coil duty is calculated on the basis of no other reheat device such as a wrap-around heat pipe. The
required temperature of the outdoor air is typically set at 17°C/75% to ensure the outdoor air is dehumidified when it is
injected into the occupied space.
Required Supply Air Condition
Volume 65.000 Cu.m.
Temperature 13.00 Deg.C DB. WBT 12.50 Deg.C WB.
Specific Enthalpy 35.36 kJ/kg. Density 1.22 kg/Cu.m.
Outside Air Intake Condition
Outside air Volume 72.500 Cu.m.
DBT 46.0 Deg.C DB. WBT 30.0 Deg.C WB.
Specific Enthalpy 98.95 kJ/kg. Density 1.08 kg/Cu.m.

Exhaust Air Condition


Volume 48.750 Cu.m.
Inlet DBT 26.0 Deg.C DB. Inlet WBT 19.5 Deg.C WB.
Specific Enthalpy 55.59 kJ/kg. Density 1.16 kg/Cu.m.

HEAT RECOVERY WHEEL SIZING CALCULATION


Theoretical maximum heat transfer 2457.9 kW
DBT at intersection of sensible and latent heat transfer 46.0 Deg.C DB
WBT at intersection of sensible and latent heat transfer 30.0 Deg.C WB
Specific Enthalpy at intersection of sensible and latent heat transfer 68.890 kJ/kg

Sensible heat transfer 753.9 kW


Latent heat transfer 1704.0 kW
% of Total efficiency of heat recovery wheel 50.0 %
% of Sensible efficiency of heat recovery wheel 50.0 %
Effective heat transfer 1229.0 kW
Effective Sensible heat transfer 377.0 kW
Effective latent heat transfer 852.0 kW

Supply air Condition after heat recovery wheel


DBT after heat recovery wheel 41.26 Deg.C DB
Specific Enthalpy after heat recovery wheel 83.19 kJ/kg
Relative Humidity from pschrometric chart (attached) 32.60 %
WBT from pschrometric chart (attached) 26.87 Deg.C WB

CHILLED WATER COIL SIZING CALCULATION


Dry Bulb Wet Bulb Enthalpy
On Coil Condn 41.26 Deg.C DB 26.9 Deg.C WB 83.19 kJ/kg
Off Coil Condn 13.0 Deg.C DB 12.5 Deg.C WB 35.36 kJ/kg
Required Temperature of OA 17.0 Deg.C DB 14.3 Deg.C WB 39.95 kJ/kg
CHW Temp. Rise 9.0 Deg.C

Sensible Coil Load 2284.9 kW Sensible Coil Reheat 323.4 kW


Total Coil Load 3790.67 kW Electrical Coil duty 324.0 kW
CHW flow 100.76 l/s
Coil load when HRW fail 5,040.30 kW
CHW flow when HRW fail 133.98 l/s

Enthalpy Calculation
wbK Ps Pv g H
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load
Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB &
27.0WB 27.0WB
Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation
Field Of Play Calc sheet no. rev Lower Tier - Spactator areas Calc sheet no. rev
Calc. by Date Checked by Date Calc. by Date Checked by Date
MS 30/7/2016 MS 30/7/2016

Field Of Play Lower Tier - Spactator areas


Tier -01 450 L/s x 200 Nos. Jet Diffusers. 90 Cu.m/s Tier -01 30848 People x 10 L/s / Person 308.48 Cu.m/s

ROOM LOAD SUMMARY ROOM LOAD SUMMARY

CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY

Sensible 996.30 kW Sensible 996.30 kW Sensible 3,414.87 kW Sensible 3,414.87 kW


Total 1,000.00 kW Total 1,000.00 kW Total 4,000.00 kW Total 4,000.00 kW
Peak Air Flow 90.00 cu.m/s RSHR 0.996 Peak Air Flow 308.48 cu.m/s RSHR 0.854

OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATION OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATION

Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C
Outside Air / Person 90.0 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C Outside Air / Person 308.5 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C
Total Outside Air 90.000 cu.m/s Total Outside Air 154.24 cu.m/s

SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION

S. A. To Room Temp. Diff. 9 deg.C S. A. To Room Temp. Diff. 9 deg.C


Supply Air Flow 90.00 cu.m/s Supply Air Flow 308.48 cu.m/s
Outside Air 100 % Outside Air 50 %

MIXED CONDITION MIXED CONDITION

Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw
Room Temperature (wet bulb) 22.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0 Room Temperature (wet bulb) 22.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0
Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00 Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00
R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 % R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 %
Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00 Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00
Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg.C Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 28.5 deg.C
Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 24.5
Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C

COOLING COIL DATA COOLING COIL DATA


DRY BULB WET BULB ENTHALPY DRY BULB WET BULB ENTHALPY
On Coil Condition 30.4 deg.C D.B. 27.0 deg. C W.B. 85 kJ/kg On Coil Condition 28.5 deg.C D.B. 24.5 deg. C W.B. 74 kJ/kg
Off Coil Condition 16.0 deg.C D.B. 15.0 deg. C W.B. 42.00 kJ/kg Off Coil Condition 16.0 deg.C D.B. 15.0 deg. C W.B. 42.00 kJ/kg
Coil Load - Sensible 1594 kW Coil Load - Sensible 4724 kW
Coil Load - Total 4742 kW 1348.3 TR Coil Load - Total 12137 kW 3451.1 TR
Supply Air Flow 90.00 cum/s Supply Air Flow 308.48 cum/s
CHW Temp. Rise 9.0 deg.C CHW Flow 126.05 l/s CHW Temp. Rise 9.0 deg.C CHW Flow 322.63 l/s
Area Area

Enthalphy Calculation Enthalphy Calculation


wbK Ps Pv g H wbK Ps Pv g H
27.000 300.16 3.564 3.335 0.021166 84.84 24.500 297.66 3.073 2.807 0.017720 73.99
15.000 288.16 1.704 1.637 0.010212 42.00 15.000 288.16 1.704 1.637 0.010212 42.00
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load
Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB &
27.0WB 27.0WB
Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation
Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP Calc sheet no. rev Upper Tier - Perimeter Cooling Calc sheet no. rev
Calc. by Date Checked by Date Calc. by Date Checked by Date
MS 30/7/2016 MS 30/7/2016

Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP Upper Tier - Perimeter Cooling
Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP 2295 People x 20 L/s / Person 45.9 Cu.m/s Tier -01 400 L/s x 847 m = 338.8 Cu.m/s

ROOM LOAD SUMMARY ROOM LOAD SUMMARY

CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY

Sensible 508.11 kW Sensible 508.11 kW Sensible 3,750.50 kW Sensible 3,750.50 kW


Total 600.00 kW Total 600.00 kW Total 4,500.00 kW Total 4,500.00 kW
Peak Air Flow 45.90 cu.m/s RSHR 0.847 Peak Air Flow 338.80 cu.m/s RSHR 0.833

OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATION OUTSIDE AIR CALCULATION

Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C Occupancy persons O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C
Outside Air / Person 23.0 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C Outside Air / Person 338.8 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C
Total Outside Air 22.95 cu.m/s Total Outside Air 338.800 cu.m/s

SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION

S. A. To Room Temp. Diff. 9 deg.C S. A. To Room Temp. Diff. 9 deg.C


Supply Air Flow 45.90 cu.m/s Supply Air Flow 338.80 cu.m/s
Outside Air 50 % Outside Air 100 %

MIXED CONDITION MIXED CONDITION

Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw Room Temperature (dry bulb) 30.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw
Room Temperature (wet bulb) 20.5 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0 Room Temperature (wet bulb) 24.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0
Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00 Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00
R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 % R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 %
Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00 Recirculating Temp. 30.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00
Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 28.5 deg.C Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg.C
Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 23.8 Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0
Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C

COOLING COIL DATA COOLING COIL DATA


DRY BULB WET BULB ENTHALPY DRY BULB WET BULB ENTHALPY
On Coil Condition 28.5 deg.C D.B. 23.8 deg. C W.B. 71 kJ/kg On Coil Condition 30.4 deg.C D.B. 27.0 deg. C W.B. 85 kJ/kg
Off Coil Condition 16.0 deg.C D.B. 15.0 deg. C W.B. 42.00 kJ/kg Off Coil Condition 20.0 deg.C D.B. 19.0 deg. C W.B. 54.07 kJ/kg
Coil Load - Sensible 703 kW Coil Load - Sensible 4334 kW
Coil Load - Total 1632 kW 464.1 TR Coil Load - Total 12820 kW 3645.2 TR
Supply Air Flow 45.90 cum/s Supply Air Flow 338.80 cum/s
CHW Temp. Rise 9.0 deg.C CHW Flow 43.39 l/s CHW Temp. Rise 9.0 deg.C CHW Flow 340.78 l/s
Area m2 Area
W/m2
Enthalphy Calculation Enthalphy Calculation
wbK Ps Pv g H wbK Ps Pv g H
23.750 296.91 2.938 2.621 0.016515 70.91 27.000 300.16 3.564 3.335 0.021166 84.84
15.000 288.16 1.704 1.637 0.010212 42.00 19.000 292.16 2.196 2.129 0.013347 54.07
FLOOR MOUNTED AIR HANDLING UNITS
LOCATED AT 8TH LEVEL ROOF AREAS TO
SERVE PERIMETER ZONE
TOTAL AIR FLOW = 338.8 M3/s
TOTAL AHUS = 50 NOS.

Back of Bowl_S-N
62319

Back of Bowl_E-W
49121
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3 Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's

44121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
39121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
34122
Level 4 - PLANT NO COOLING WILL BE
29121 PROVIDED FOR VOID
SPACE. (BETWEEN Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP CONCOURSE AND
24121 FACADE)
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY
19121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 1 - CONCOURSE LOWER
13121
Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 0 - Pitch
6000

CEILING MOUNTED AIR HANDLING UNITS FLOOR MOUNTED AIR HANDLING UNITS
LOCATED AT LEVEL- 02 AREAS TO SERVE VVIP / LOCATED AT LEVEL- 00 AREAS TO SERVE PITCH /
SKY ZONES. CONCOURSE ZONES.
TOTAL AIR FLOW = 45.9M3/s PITCH - TOTAL AIR FLOW = 90.0 M3/s
TOTAL AHUS = 40 NOS. PITCH - TOTAL AHUS = 10 NOS.
CONCOURSE - TOTAL AIR FLOW = 308.48 M3/s

E-W SECTION
CONCOURSE - TOTAL AHUS = 100 NOS.

1 1 : 600
A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance
A-5.4, HVAC - Plant Location (SECTION)
PROJECT NUMBER : 5044

PROJECT TITLE : LUSAIL STADIUM PROJECT

A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

A-5.5 HVAC SYSTEM ( REQUIRED PLANT SPACES ) BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN & VE OPTION DESIGNS

BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN BASED ON VE OPTION DESIGN


CURRENT / REVISED CURRENT REVISED LPS/HE
ITEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION TAG REF. M3 TYPE AREA SERVED LOCATION
LEVEL NAMES LEVELS LEVELS AD POWER POWER
TOTAL TOTAL
(L x W) Full Areas QTY REQUREM (L x W) Full Areas QTY REQUREM REMARKS
AREA(M2) AREA(M2)
ENT(KW) ENT(KW)

Basement (B4) (excl slab Pitch / Concourse


LEVEL - B4 AHU Plant AHU Plant Room 10437 7100
under FOP) Cooling

Lower Plaza West (B3) LEVEL - B3 Nil 20875 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

Lower Plaza (B2) LEVEL - B2 ETS Room All Areas ETS Plant Room 21370 3800

Lower Plaza Mezzanine


LEVEL - B1 AHU Plant Concourse Cooling AHU Plant Room 3265 3265
(B1)

AHU Plant Space - Pitch & Pitch Cooling &


Player / FOP LEVEL - 0 AHU AHU Plant Room 33590 4142
Spectator Concourse Areas

South Zone (Perimeter of the


Player / FOP LEVEL - 0 ETS Plant Room - 01 ETS All Areas ETS Plant Room 640
building)

Player / FOP LEVEL - 0 ETS Plant Room - 02 ETS All Areas ETS Plant Room 640 North Zone (Perimeter of the building)

AHU Plant Space - Front of Front of house & Back


Player / FOP LEVEL - 0 AHU AHU Plant Room 14970 1000 Back side of the Kitchen
house & Back of house of house

Plaza LEVEL - PL 31269 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

Premium Mezzanine/VIP
LEVEL - B1 9920 0 No Plant Room for HVAC
Lounge

Emir Level/Royal suites LEVEL - PL AHU Plant Concourse Cooling AHU Plant Room 14504 12000

Hospitality Club level LEVEL - 01 24255 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Lower Concourse LEVEL - 1 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse Cooling Ceiling Void 14250
provided inside the ceiling void

Hospitality Sky Boxes LEVEL - 02 21566 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

Plant (P2) LEVEL - P2 AHU Plant 13239 10500

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Hospitality & VVIP LEVEL - 2 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse Cooling Ceiling Void 11284
provided inside the ceiling void

Upper Tier 03 LEVEL - 03 27531 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

Plant 1 (P3) LEVEL - P3 AHU Plant 8086 8086

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Sky Box & VVIP LEVEL - 3 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse Cooling Ceiling Void 4888
provided inside the ceiling void

Plant 2 (P4) LEVEL - P4 4348 0 No Plant Room for HVAC

Upper tier (04) LEVEL - 04 AHU Plant Upper Tier cooling AHU Plant Room 8016 8016

Providing Fresh air for all areas in


Concourse Cooling (Outside air -
Plant TBD & Cores LEVEL - 4 AHU Concourse all areas AHU Plant Room 16702 800 concourse 2 Nos. Air Handling units
air handling units)
in each wing ( 4 Wings)

Perimeter cooling for


Plant (P05) LEVEL - 05 AHU Plant AHU Plant Room 5213 5213
upper tier

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Upper Concourse - 01 LEVEL - 5 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse cooling Ceiling Void 6593
provided inside the ceiling void

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Upper Concourse - 02 LEVEL - 6 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse cooling Ceiling Void 4065
provided inside the ceiling void

Page 1 of 2
PROJECT NUMBER : 5044

PROJECT TITLE : LUSAIL STADIUM PROJECT

A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance

A-5.5 HVAC SYSTEM ( REQUIRED PLANT SPACES ) BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN & VE OPTION DESIGNS

BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN BASED ON VE OPTION DESIGN


CURRENT / REVISED CURRENT REVISED LPS/HE
ITEM EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION TAG REF. M3 TYPE AREA SERVED LOCATION
LEVEL NAMES LEVELS LEVELS AD POWER POWER
TOTAL TOTAL
(L x W) Full Areas QTY REQUREM (L x W) Full Areas QTY REQUREM REMARKS
AREA(M2) AREA(M2)
ENT(KW) ENT(KW)

All the HVAC equipment's will be


Upper Concourse - 03 LEVEL - 7 Concourse cooling AHU Concourse cooling Ceiling Void
provided inside the ceiling void

Mounted at each at each level of the


ALL Levels
Smoke Extract Fans SEF All Areas Roof Level Concourse level within the ceiling
(Except L0)
void

All the stairwell & Smoke stop lobbies


pressurization fans will be located at
LEVEL - 8 ROOF Stairwell & Smoke stop lobbies Top of the core
Plant TBD SPF 24 Core the top of the core.( Where necessary
LEVEL pressurization fans Levels
will be duct via ceiling void to
perimeter)

Perimeter Cooling for


LEVEL - 8 ROOF
Plant TBD Perimeter Air handling units AHU upper tier (Spectator AHU Plant Room 0 3600 Roof Level (Space required 3600 M2)
LEVEL
areas)

Field of Play + Stadium


Bowl + Lower Tier + Mid 66804
Tier + Upper Tier

223894 57980 173146 10822 47158

Note : The Blue marked is the original design and Green marked is revised design.

Page 2 of 2
ETS ROOM

AHU'S ROOM AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM AHU'S ROOM

ETS ROOM
AHU'S ROOM AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM AHU'S ROOM

AHU'S ROOM
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-6 VE of Mechanical/Equipment Engineering and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 308
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-7 VE of Landscape and External Works and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 309
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-8 VE of Civil Infrastructure, Roads and Utilities and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 310
DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 50 000 100 000

1 : 1000

No

Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date


Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL STADIUM
Drawing Title

COMPOSITE UTILITY CORRIDOR


Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Designed Drawn Checked

Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

Drawing No
A3
227200 227400 227600 227800 228000 228200 228400 228600

25/01/2016 11:46:02
°
! Legend

Site Boundary
Precinct Boundary
3.000
00
3.5

Indicative location of Former Woqod


0
00
3.

Fuel Tanks*
408200

0
50
2.
AD
OAD

3.500
RO
R
ALT
AS PH
00
HALL 3.0
REST

RO
R AD
OAD 3.0
ALT 00
AS PH 00 3.0

3.000
K
AC
3.000
TR

3.5
00

3.500
3.500
3.50
0

0
3.50

0
50

3.5

00
3.

3.
00
2.500
K 3.0
AC
0
00
TR
00
4. 3.500 3.
50
0

4.000
3.500

00
408000

3.0

4.500
3.0
00
4.0
00 4.000

4.0
0
4.00

00
4.000

3.5
AD
OAD
0
RO
R

4.50
ALT
AS PH
4.0

00
4.0
00 3.500

00
00
00
4.000
4.000

4.0
5.0
AS
PH
A LT
RO
4.500
0
4.000
4.00
AD

00
4.00
0

4.5
00

4.000
00 4.500
6.0 5.5 STR UC
TI ON
C ON

4.
UN DER
AR EA

00
00

0
5.5
6.500 3.50

4.000
0

4.000
0 6.000
00

00
7.

4.0
00
4.500
4.500

5.0
00 4.5
5.000
7.0 00

0
4.50
0
50

4.000
6.

4.000
GALFAR CAMP

0
4.500
00

3.50
00
4.0

00
3.5
3.000

3.000

3.5
7.50

3.
00
0

50
407800

5.5

0
00

4.500

4.000
7.5

4.000
00
6.0

3.5
00
3.500
00

00 4.500
7.0

4.5

Notes:
5.000

4.000
00

*Location of fuel tanks estimated from Google Earth


4.
3.5 00
6.5

00 0
00
4.5
00 3.500

4.000
image dated 27-10-2016
3.5

00
4.0

3.5
MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE 00

00
4.0
0
50

4.0 0
TRA C
K 50 0
5.

00 4. 4.00
00
6.0

3.500

P0 2016-01-25 SB CB CB
4.5 4.0 4.5
00 00 00
00
5.0

MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE 5.0 4.000


00 4.50
0

3.500
4.500 4.000
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
0
3.500
00

0
00 50
50 4.500
5.5 4.
4. K
4.5

4.00
TRA C
0
50 0
4.
00
4.5 5.000 5.5 00 5.0

0
00 4.5

00
00 0 5.0
0
4.50

5.
50 00 5.000 00 4.500
5. 4.5
5.000 5.000
6.000 Metres
407600

5.
50
0 65 130 260
4.500

5.0 0
00 00
6.0

0
4.00
0

6.
5.00

50
6.0
00

0
6.500
0
50
5.
0
AS PHA

5.00

00
MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE 00
5.

7. 6.500

5.0
00
LT R

0
7.00
0

5.500
ROA
OAD

5.000

4.500
5.500
D

0
00
7.50 0

6.
0 5.50

7.000
5.500 6.00
0
0
00

3.500
5. 6.500
5.500

00
7.5
0
50
5.500

5.0
6.

00

4.000
00
00

5.0
5.5 6.5
TRAC

0
6.00

00
00

7.50
0 00
5.

6.

00
7.000

7.0
K

00 4.5
50

5.0
0
0
00

MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE

Central Square, Forth Street


6.0
5.500

00

0
6.0
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3PL

50

00
5.

3.5
0
6.
50
4.50
0 Tel +44 (0) 191 261 6080 Fax +44 (0) 191 261 7879
00 www.arup.com
6.5

7.00 4.0
6.000
00

0 7.500
00
6.000
5.0
4.500
7.5

Client
407400

00
00

4.0

3.500
AD

00
RO
R OAD
7.000 0 ALT
5.00

Supreme Committee
AS PH
00

7.0
6.0 00

00
6.000 5.5 0

6.5
00

4.500
4.
7.0

5.000
0
5.500
6.50
00

7.0

6.5
5.000
00

00
0
00
6.5

6.
00

0
50
0
5.00
7.000

5.
7.000
7.5

0
3.50
00

4.000

Job Title
00
6.500

7.0
0
50
7.

Lusail Stadium

00
5.000

4.5
7.00
7.0

00

Scheme Stage Geo-Environmental Report

0
6.5

00
00

00
00

4.
0 HBK C AMP
7.50
6.0

5.5
0

00
0

0
50
00

00
6.5
7.
7.
7.

0
00
5.
7.500

4.500
00
6.0
407200

00

5.500
7.5

0
00 7.0
8. 00
00

Site Layout
6.0 RO
R AD
OAD
00

ALT
AS PH
00
AS PHA

6.5
00

7.0
7.5
LT R
ROA
OAD

7.50
D

7.500 0
0
8.50

00
8.0

8.000 00
8.0

Scale at A3
1:5,000
8.500 9.0
00
00
00

8.5

RO
R AD
OAD
ALT
8.5

AS PH
8.5

Job No Drawing Status


00

9.000

240601 Information
00
8.0

9.000
00

Figure No Issue
8.5
407000

2 I1
0
50

9.000
8.

MXD Location © Arup


A3
227200 227400 227600 227800 228000 228200 228400 228600

25/01/2016 10:57:35
°
! Legend

Site Boundary
Precinct Boundary
Indicative location of Former Woqod Fuel
Tanks*
408200

Groundwater Levels mQNHD**


<-10
-8.9 - -8.0
-7.9 - -7.0
BH-4030
-5.35

-6.9 - -6.0
BH-4002
-5.25
-5.9 - -5.0
BH-4031
-5.46
-4.9 - -4.00
408000

BH-4041
BH-4021
-4.98 -5.96

BH-4019
-5.43

BH-4006 BH-4047
BH-4023 -6.24 -6.46
-5.53

BH-4032
-6.62
Notes:
407800

BH-4024 *Location of fuel tanks estimated from Google Earth


-5.81
image dated 27-10-2016
BH-4025
-5.28
BH-2011
**Average of groundwater level monitoring data as
-6.13 BH-4037 presented in Groundwater Level Monitoring
-6.34 Report (21-09-2015)

P0 2016-01-25 SB CB DP

BH-4051
BH-2010 -7.16
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
-6.38

BH-4043 Metres
BH-2007 -6.85
407600

-6.04 0 65 130 260


BH-4033
-6.24

BH-2006 BH-2002
-5.95 -6.07

BH-4050 Central Square, Forth Street


-7.64 Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3PL
Tel +44 (0) 191 261 6080 Fax +44 (0) 191 261 7879
www.arup.com

Client
407400

BH-4035

Supreme Committee
BH-2012 -7.16
-6.66

Job Title
BH-4010 BH-4029
-8.06 -9.36
Lusail Stadium
Scheme Stage Geo-Environmental Report

BH-4018
-7.52
407200

BH-4026
-7.81

Average Groundwater Levels


BH-4008
-6.42
BH-4013
-5.87

Scale at A3

1:5,000
Job No Drawing Status

240601 Information
Figure No Issue
407000

6 I1

MXD Location © Arup


(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Power Utilities Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1500
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued for Tender SB AJ 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Potable Water Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1501
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB AJ 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Irrigation Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1502
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed District Cooling Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1503
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Telecommunications Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1504
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Storm Drainage Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1505
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Foul Drainage Utility Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1506
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Legend

Lusail Precinct Boundary

Lusail Stadium and Plaza Boundary

Access route by KahraMaa to substations in stadium

4.0 Proposed road / basement level

Proposed location of stadium substations

VSA Vehicle Search Area

Entry / exit point to site

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


0 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Access Routes to Stadium Transformer Rooms

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
The area shown hatched in grey is excluded from the 1 : 2000
scope of these works and should not be considered. Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1507
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Issued For Tender SB AJ 03/04/16


Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Proposed Fire Hydrant Layout Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1509
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 50 000 100 000

1 : 1000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Utility Works Beyond Stadium and Plaza Boundary
(Blue Line)
Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup CH DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1511

pspace
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000

1 : 2000

General Notes

1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.

No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Project Manager (logo)

Design Consultant (logo)

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


Drawing Title

Civils
Street Lighting Plan

Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup CB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1007
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)

21.00

Verge / Pavement Road Median Road Verge / Pavement


Varies 7.30 3.70 7.30 Varies
Gravel Strip Shoulder Road Edge Road Edge Shoulder Gravel Strip
0.50 0.35 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.50

Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.

DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING.

TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2

Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100
10
12
50
25
5
21000
6 500
000
500
250
000
500
000 100
200
10
12
50
20
25
51000
2000
000
000
500
000

111::2000
1000
:125
500
200
250
100
50
10
20

General Notes
Typical Road Section A - A 1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other

Bus Drop-off Roads schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.

2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.

3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.

4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.

Varies (Typical 15.15m) 5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
Footway/Verge Footway/Verge
Varies Varies
(3.075m Typical) Road 3.075m Typical)
7.30
Gravel Strip Shoulder Shoulder Gravel Strip
0.50 0.35 0.35 0.50

PLOT BOUNDARY

PLOT BOUNDARY
Typical Road Section B - B
Two Way, Two Lane Road

Varies (Typical 15.15m)


Footway/Verge Footway/Verge
Varies Varies
(3.075m Typical) Road 3.075m Typical)
7.30
Gravel Strip Shoulder Shoulder Gravel Strip
0.50 0.35 0.35 0.50

PLOT BOUNDARY

PLOT BOUNDARY

1.0 Potable Water

3.0 Foul Water


1.0 Comms
1.8 Power
Plan

2.0 TSE
Scale 1:2500 Typical Road Section D - D
No Description
Two Way, Two Lane Road SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.

T0 Revised - Issued For Tender SB DC 03/04/16


1 100% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 28/02/16
0 50% Schematic Design Submission SB DC 08/12/15
Rev Description Apvr Chk'd Date
Client

Varies
Project Manager (logo)

Shoulder Road Edge 19.85 Road Edge Shoulder


0.35 0.50 0.50 0.35
56.5 Verge/Footway Cycleway Verge/Footway Road Median Future LRT Median Road Verge/Footway Cycleway Verge/Footway
Varies 1.50 3.00 2 x 3.65 7.15 6.00 6.70 2 x 3.65 3.00 1.50 Varies
Design Consultant (logo)
PLOT BOUNDARY

PLOT BOUNDARY
STADIUM BOUNDARY

Project Title

LUSAIL PRECINCT OVERLAY, DOHA, QATAR


1.0 Potable Water

5.0 Surface Water

Drawing Title
3.0 Foul Water

Civils

3.0 Comms

1.0 Potable
0.6 Power

0.6 Power
2.4 Power

Utility's shown are not typical of general arraignment but of Typical Cross Sections Sheet 1
2.0 TSE

2.0 TSE

4.0 DC

narrowest point between stadium basement and D3 road.


Purpose of Issue Seal Date

Issued For Tender 03/04/16


Typical Road Section C - C Designed Drawn Checked
reated using CADplot http://www.oasys-software.com/cadplot/

Arup IB DC
Road D3 Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No

1 : 10
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-3005
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-9 VE of GSAS/ GORD Sustainability Compliance and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 311
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-10 VE of CFD Modeling of Isothermal, Thermal and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 312
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-11 VE of Players Pitch and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 313
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-12 VE of Security Strategy & Blast Analysis and Code Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 314
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-13 VE of Electrical Engineering including ICT Analysis and Code Compliance

A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on
the VE Option design.

A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design

A-13.3 ICT/ ELV System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 315
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment
Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Lusail  Stadium ‐ Doha Qatar

2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical  Domestic  Sewage 
Supply  Fire Fighting  Water Supply 
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen  Water Heater  Lift Pumps and  Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]

1.  Lighting and power systems 

1.1 Level 
00 ‐ Players / FOP
BROADCAST AREAS 176 8 30 1.408 5.28
CEREMONIES 130 8 20 1.04 2.6
FIFA/LOC offices 1524 8 40 12.192 60.96
MEDIA 1092 8 20 8.736 21.84
MEDICAL FACILITIES 99 8 10 0.792 0.99
PLANT 4077 5 10 20.385 40.77
PLAYING AREA 985 8 10 7.88 9.85
SECURITY SERVICE 3507 8 30 28.056 105.21
SERVICE COMPOUNDS 16202 5 20 81.01 324.04
SERVICE ROAD/TUNNEL 7229 5 5 36.145 36.145
STADIUM SIGN AGE AND DECOR 145 8 5 1.16 0.725
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 3222 8 5 25.776 16.11
VVIP/VIP 60 8 10 0.48 0.6

01 ‐ Lower Concourse
HOSPITAL_ENTRANCE LOBBIES 502 8 10 4.016 5.02
SPECTATOR AREA 7123 8 10 56.984 71.23
SPECTATOR AREA_ANCILLIARY 4955 8 10 39.64 49.55
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 4079 8 10 32.632 40.79

02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP
HOSPITALITY_LOUNGE 5056 8 10 40.448 50.56
HOSPITALLY_ANCILLIARY 4440 8 10 35.52 44.4
VIP_ANCILAY 966 8 10 7.728 9.66
VIP_LOUNGE 1338 8 10 10.704 13.38
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 2920 5 5 14.6 14.6

03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP
HOSPITALLY_SKYBOX & SUITES 12189 8 10 97.512 121.89

04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores
PLANT 6586 5 5 32.93 32.93
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 2920 5 5 14.6 14.6

05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1
MEDIA 22 8 20 0.176 0.44
SPECTATOR AREA 14571 8 5 116.568 72.855
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1659 8 10 13.272 16.59
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 388 8 10 3.104 3.88
VERTICAL CIRCULATION 2269 5 5 11.345 11.345

06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1528 8 10 12.224 15.28
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 5684 8 10 45.472 56.84

07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1528 8 10 12.224 15.28
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 5684 8 10 45.472 56.84

08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 8 5 0 0

1.2  EVENT LIGHTING
Façade Lighting loads 30
Extrenal Lighting loads  462

3. Vertical Transportation
Passenger Elevator‐01 (1S) 240
Passenger Elevator‐02 (2S) 360
Passenger Elevator‐03 (3S) 120

4. Electrical Kitchen  (based on the current deign)
Main Kitchen  633.9
VIP lounge (North) 103
VIP lounge (South) 97
VIP lounge(North) 103
VIP lounge(South) 103
Emir Level  140
VVIP lounge (North) 109

Load Estimation ‐ Page: 1
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment
Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Lusail  Stadium ‐ Doha Qatar

2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical  Domestic  Sewage 
Supply  Fire Fighting  Water Supply 
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen  Water Heater  Lift Pumps and  Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]

VVIP lounge (South) 97
Sky support Pantries  296

5. Fire Protection system 
Fire Pumps 300
Jockey Pump 60
Circulation  Pump: 3

6. Plumbing
 PUMP SETS 410
 WATER SUMP PUMP SETS 71
DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS 1270

7.  HVAC
Chilled Water Pumps 1120
Press. Units  20
Exhaust Fans 150
Air Handling Units 1400
Jet Fans 120
Smoke Fans 800 800
VRF‐DX units  300

8. Miscellaneous
Special Lighting Loads‐By UPS (5 Min.) 850
ELV Equipment ‐ICT / Security‐By Generator 1010.4
ELV Equipment ‐AV ‐By Generator 568.8
ELV Equipment (Emir Suite ‐VOC) ‐ By UPS (5 Min.) 80
ELV Equipment (telecommunication) ‐ By UPS (5 Min.) 300
ELV Equipment ‐ By UPS (60 Min.) 100

Load Category Totals
TCL ‐ Normal (kW) 1364 1343 2820 0 940 950 1682 1270 720 363 410 71 2909
TCL ‐ Essential (kW) 1091 537 987 940 841 432 246 43 2909
Demand Factors ‐ Summer 1 0.75 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.7 1 0.8 0 0.6 0.6 1
MDL ‐ Normal (kW) 1364 1007 2820 0 752 760 1177 1270 576 0 246 43 2909

Formula inside the cell Green

Input required Yellow White

Load Estimation ‐ Page: 2
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment
Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Lusail  Stadium ‐ Doha Qatar

2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical  Domestic  Sewage 
Supply  Fire Fighting  Water Supply 
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen  Water Heater  Lift Pumps and  Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]

Transformer Selection contingency % (load growth & design) 
TCL ‐ Normal (kW) 14842 20 17811 DF
MDL ‐ Normal (kW) 12925 20 15510 0.871

Built Up Area (m²) 124855

Power Density on actual TCL (W/m2) 119
Power Density on contingency TCL (W/m2) 143
Power Density on actual MDL (W/m2) 104
Power Density on contingency MDL (W/m2) 124
Loading % Power Factor
Transformer capacity required (kVA) 19007 80 0.85
Minimum transformer capacity (kVA) 22808 20 % contingency

Actual quantity required without contingency 11.879
Actual quantity required with contingency 14.255
Roundup quantity  with contingency 15
Tx Rating (kVA) 1600
Substation required within the project YES

Generator Selection
TCL ‐ Essential (kW) 8026
Power Density on actual TCL (W/m2) 64

% to Normal TCL 54%
Sizing Power Factor
Generator Capacity Required (kVA) 12541 1.25 0.8
Minimum Generator Capacity (kVA) 13795 10 % contingency

Load Estimation ‐ Page: 3
A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) based on original and VE design option
Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on the current and VE Option design As per VE Design
As per Original Design
As Per Tender Revised
TOTAL 
New Area Sq.m Electrical Rooms  L (m) W(m) QTY
Floor Level AREA(Sq.m)
Basement (B4) (excl slab under FOP) 00 ‐ Players / FOP 33589.7625 Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 4 5 4 80
Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 4.9 4.85 2 47.53 Electrical  room  4 5 4 80
Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 6.25 4.85 2 60.625 Substation 1
Lower Plaza West (B3) Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Electrical  room  6 6 2 72 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Substation 1 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.8 7.6 1 59.28 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 13.7 7.9 1 108.23 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential 
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.1 4.9 1 44.59 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.6 7.5 1 57 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.3 7.5 1 92.25 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Essential 
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 4.9 1 98.98 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Generator room 13.3 6.2 1 82.46 Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.5 7.5 1 56.25 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.6 1 94.24 Life safety  (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.5 4.9 1 46.55 Substation 4
LV room 9.2 5.9 1 54.28 Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Life safety  (LV room ) 13.2 4.9 1 64.68 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Substation 4 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.7 7.4 1 56.98 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 13.6 7.5 1 102 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential 
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 13.6 6.7 1 91.12 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.6 7.4 1 56.24 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.4 1 91.76 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Essential 
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20 5 1 100 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Generator room 13.3 5.9 1 78.47 Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.4 7.4 1 54.76 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.6 7.4 1 93.24 Life safety  (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5 1 50 Substation 2
LV room 9.2 5.9 1 54.28 Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Life safety  (LV room ) 13.6 5 1 68 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Lower Plaza (B2) Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Electrical  room  6 6 2 72 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Substation 2 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential 
Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  8.4 7.4 1 62.16 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 16.3 7.4 1 120.62 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 21.6 7.6 1 164.16 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  9.1 7.2 1 65.52 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
6.4 7.2 1 46.08 Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 4.9 7.2 1 35.28 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Essential 
6.9 7.8 1 53.82 Life safety  (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 19.5 4.3 1 83.85 Substation 3
Generator room 14.2 4.4 1 62.48 Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  9.1 7.2 1 65.52 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.2 1 89.28 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
LV room 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential 
Life safety  (LV room ) 9.5 5.1 1 48.45 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Substation 3 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Non –Essential  Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  8.5 7.4 1 62.9 Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 16.3 7.4 1 120.62 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 21.6 7.5 1 162 Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  9.1 7.1 1 64.61 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
6.4 7.2 1 46.08 Life safety  (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Transformer room (TX room ) 4.9 7.2 1 35.28 01 ‐ Lower Concourse 14969.95631 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Essential 
6.9 9.4 1 64.86 02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP 14250.48261 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 14.5 5.1 1 73.95 03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP 11284.34934 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Generator room 13.9 4.5 1 62.55 04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores 4888
Medium Voltage room ( MV room)  7.3 7.2 1 52.56 05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1 16702.3306 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.2 1 89.28 06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2 6592.50623 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Essential –backup  Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 19.5 4.3 1 83.85 07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3 4064.988449 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 8 128
LV room 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 Electrical  room ‐1 4 4 4 64
Life safety  (LV room ) 9.8 5.5 1 53.9 Electrical  room ‐2 (MCC) 10 5 4 200
Plaza Electrical  room ‐1 4.5 4 2 36 Electrical  room ‐3 (Lighting control) 10 5 4 200
Electrical  room ‐2 6.6 3 1 19.8 4267
Electrical  room ‐3 6.6 4 3 79.2 TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.376
Electrical  room ‐4 6 3 2 36
Premium Mezzanine/VIP Lounge NIL
Emir Level/Royal suites(RS) NIL
Hospitality Club level (01) Electrical  room ‐1 4.4 3.3 4 58.08
Electrical  room ‐2 5.4 3.2 2 34.56
Electrical  room ‐3 5.4 4 2 43.2
Hospitality Sky Boxes (02) NIL
Plant (P2) Electrical  room ‐1 4.6 3 4 55.2
Electrical  room ‐2 6.3 4 4 100.8
Upper Tier 03 NIL
Plant 1 (P3) Electrical  room ‐1 4.9 4.5 4 88.2
Plant 2 (P4) Electrical  room ‐1 15.7 5.4 4 339.12
Upper tier (04) NIL
Plant (P05) Electrical  room ‐1 6.2 2.6 4 64.48
4950.775

‐14% Reduction
A-13.3 ICT/ ELV System (Required plant spaces) based on the original design and VE design
ICT/ ELV System  (Required plant spaces) Based on the current and VE Option design
VE design Original design
Revised As Per Tender
New Area Sq.m ICT Rooms Floor Level
00 ‐ Players / FOP 33589.76 MOI Communication Network Room 137 TBD Lower Plaza West (B3) MOI Communication Network Room  137
Cellular Equipment Room 159 TBD Cellular Equipment Room   159
Central Apparatus Room - Broadcast 200 TBD Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   200
Telecoms Equipment Room 1 92 TBD Sub‐Comms Room   110
Telecoms Equipment Room 2 92 TBD Central Apparatus Room ‐ Broadcast   200
Main Comms Room 1 210 TBD Lower Plaza (B2) Telecoms Equipment Room 1   92
Main Comms Room 2 210 TBD Telecoms Equipment Room 2   92
Radio Equipment Room 103 TBD Main Comms Room 1   210
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Main Comms Room 2   210
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Radio Equipment Room   103
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   14
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   17
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   17
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 25 5 Plaza Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   26
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 25 5 Sub‐Comms Room   28
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   28
01 ‐ Lower Concourse 14969.96 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   25
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   26
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   31
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   22
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   26
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Premium Mezzanine/VIP Lounge Sub‐Comms Room   14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Emir Level/Royal suites Sub‐Comms Room   20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Hospitality Club level Sub‐Comms Room   20
02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP 14250.48 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Hospitality Sky Boxes Sub‐Comms Room   14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   18
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   21
03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP 11284.35 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Plant (P2) Sub‐Comms Room   17
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   29
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room   29
04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores 4888 Sub‐Comms Room   17
05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1 16702.33 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   17
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   29
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   29
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack)   17
06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2 6592.506 Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Upper Tier 03
Sub-Comms Room 14 3
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Plant 1 (P3) Sub‐Comms Room   20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   20
07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3 4064.988 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room   21
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Plant 2 (P4) Sub‐Comms Room   21
08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Sub‐Comms Room   21
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Sub‐Comms Room   21
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Upper tier (04)
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Plant (P05) Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 15
Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
Sub‐Comms Room   18
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 15
TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.4 1935 2622
26% Reduction
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-14 VE of Facade Engineering - Inhabit Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 316
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-15 VE of Roof Structure and Steel - OPS Structural Engineering

16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-120

16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-121

16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-122

16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-123

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 317
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-16 VE of Crowd Modeling - Crowd Dynamics

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 318
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-17 Consideration of Legacy Approach related to VE Decisions

HVAC Cooling Load and Outside Air Ventilation Calculation

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 319
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 320
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 321
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 322
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 323
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 324
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 325
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 326
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 327
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 328
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 329
PROJECT
LUSAIL STADIUM
DOCUMENT ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND(BASED ON LEGACY MODE) 2016-06-30
Qatar Office

5044
RFS 30-Jun-16

ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND

Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Number of Occupants
Item No. SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
per IBC

Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM) Daily Flow(LPD) Peak(LPM)

1 22,665 2,300 60 138,000 110,400


WEST STAND, OFFICES

2 17,248 850 230 195,500 156,400


SOUTH STAND, CLINICS

3 18,920 350 210 73,500 58,800


EAST STAND, APARTMENTS

4 21,691 1,350 75 101,250 81,000


NORTH STAND, SCHOOL

508,250 406,600

Total Domestic Water & Sewage Demand 80,524 508 m3 407 1 DAY

2 DAYS(60% Potable &


Two(2) Days Storage per Kharamaa Requirement 1,016
40% Non-potable)

Irrigation N/A m3 Condensate Recovery

HVAC Make Up(Central Plant # 1) N/A m3 District Cooling

Fire Water Reserve N/A m3 Refer to FP design

1,017,008

Note: Tank size per Legacy mode of 1,017 m3 as estimated above is almost equal
to the VE design of 1,152 m3.
Initials Division

Design
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - LEGACY MODE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev

ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Potable cold water supply) By Date

Qatar Office RFS 5046 Checked By KT Date

A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.

PROBABLE WATER FLOW RATES(POTABLE WATER SUPPLY)


Cold Water Supply Feed System
Quantity per floor Table E 103.3 (2) Load Values for Fixture Unit Total Fixture Units / Appliances
Total Fixture Table E Gravity Booster
Units 103.3 (2)
Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal, Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Total Table E Total Table E
Conversion
Item No. Description AREA(M2) Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Flush Valve Sink Closet, 2 basin sink Spray or Machine Sink Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Sink
to Design
Fixture 103.3 (2) Fixture 103.3 (2) Remarks
Bidet for Flush Bidet Bidet Units Design Units Design
Flow Rate,
Tank, 5 for Flow Rate, Flow Rate,
L/s
Flush Valve L/s L/s

1 OFFICES 22665 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 102.50 2.70 - - 102.50 2.70 Flush Valves

2 CLINICS 17248 0 35 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 17.50 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 137.50 3.40 - - 137.50 3.40 Flush Valves

3 APARTMENTS 18920 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 60 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 50.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 270.00 5.00 - - 270.00 5.00 Flush Valves

4 SCHOOL 21691 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.00 121.00 3.00 - - 121.00 3.00 Flush Valves

80524

Total for item 1 to 8 631.00 0.00 14.10

Sub-total 14.10
Add 10% Allowance 15.51

Total 15.51 L/S

Comments

Initials Division Office


JA D&P Doha
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - LEGACY MODE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev

ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Non potable cold water supply) By Date

Qatar Office RFS 5046 Checked By KT Date

A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.

PROBABLE WATER FLOW RATES(NON-POTABLE WATER SUPPLY)


Cold Water Supply Feed System
Quantity per floor Table E 103.3 (2) Load Values for Fixture Unit Total Fixture Units / Appliances
Total Fixture Table E Gravity Booster
Units 103.3 (2)
Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal, Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Water Wash-hand Bath Tub Shower Kitchen Hygiene Washing Urinal Service Hose Bibb Total Table E Total Table E
Conversion
Item No. Description AREA(M2) Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Flush Valve Sink Closet, 2 basin sink Spray or Machine Sink Closet basin sink Spray or Machine Sink
to Design
Fixture 103.3 (2) Fixture 103.3 (2) Remarks
Bidet for Flush Bidet Bidet Units Design Units Design
Flow Rate,
Tank, 5 for Flow Rate, Flow Rate,
L/s
Flush Valve L/s L/s

1 OFFICES 22665 42 0 0 0 0 48 0 20 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 210.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 60.00 442.00 6.70 - - 442.00 6.70 Flush Valves

2 CLINICS 17248 70 0 0 0 0 86 0 30 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 60.00 689.00 10.00 - - 689.00 10.00 Flush Valves

3 APARTMENTS 18920 30 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 60 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 321.00 5.80 - - 321.00 5.80 Flush Valves

4 SCHOOL 21691 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 48 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 96.00 1246.00 14.00 - 1246.00 14.00 Flush Valves

80524 242

Total for item 1 to 8 2698.00 0.00 36.50

Sub-total 36.50
Add 10% Allowance 40.15

Total 40.15 L/S

Comments

Initials Division Office


JA D&P Doha
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-18 VE of Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to FIFA Compliance

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 330
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

A-19 VE of Miscellaneous Opportunities, including minor commodity items

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 331
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Appendix B Conforming Tender (Pricing Schedule + Tender Adjustment Schedule)

To be provided separately.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 332
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering

Appendix C Alternative Tender (Pricing Schedule + Tender Adjustment Schedule –


VE Items)

To be provided separately.

Milestone 4

Validate Value Engineering Options


Page 333

You might also like