Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VALUE ENGNEERING
MILESTONE 4
Validate
Value Engineering
Options
Rev 0
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
1 Executive Summary
1.1 Introduction
This report has been prepared in response to Lusail Stadium Value Engineering Scope of
Service and is submitted to the Design and Build Contractor (HBK-CRCC JV) for their review
and approval. It is the Stage 4 deliverable in a six-stage process to produce an alternative to
the ‘base-bid’ Norman Foster FIFA World Cup design for the stadium. In the report, the team is
tasked with following a structured evaluation process to select those ideas that offer the potential
for VE improvement while delivering the project’s goals and considering performance
requirements and resource limits. Following review of the Stage 4 deliverables by the client,
KEO will take on board comments received from the JV and provide iterations to the VE items
and incorporate into the Stage 5 – Final Value Engineering Report.
The main conclusions and points of note follow in the Executive Summary.
1.2 Sustainability
The VE considerations from a purely sustainability perspective (while still achieving a GSAS 4
Star rating) are:
Materials Certification 1 - No ISO14001/BS8902 certification requirement for material
suppliers
Materials Certification 2 - No LCA/EPD Certificates required from material suppliers
Reduced Specifications of Water & Refrigerant Leak Detection Systems
Minimum Energy metering and still providing water Sub-metering
Remove 6,500m2 PV panels from the roof
Remove bicycle, bicycle lanes and anything else that it is related to bicycles.
Milestone 4
In addition to the reduction in area of the vessel surface, the Arup/Foster façade
supporting structure can be considerably simplified whilst maintaining the same (or very
similar) external appearance and as a result significant cost savings can potentially be
achieved.
The stadium has been assessed internally from a high level perspective to show that the
design has enough flexibility to cater for vertical circulation of spectators and required
vomitory widths for each GA, hospitality and VIP/VVIP spectators.
The external landscaping of the VE proposal has made use of the additional space and
mitigated the level change from precinct to concourse level within 3 options that have
been analysed. Stair and ramp designs have been proposed based on fifth edition
guidance to be used in the design. Option 1 with stairs and ramps, and options 2a and
2b with only ramps were analysed dynamically and statically as appropriate to measure
their applicability to guidelines.
Crowd management was considered at a high level through the modelling, analysis and
design, with emergency egress provision in-line with standards previously laid out in
stage 1 and original design documentation.
Further design iterations and crowd modelling would be required to match the internal
exits with sufficient vertical circulation externally and crowd management strategy being
developed, especially considering emergency provision.
Milestone 4
2 Introduction
This report has been prepared in response to Lusail Stadium Value Engineering Scope of
Service and is submitted to the Design and Build Contractor (HBK-CRCC JV) for their review
and approval. It is a deliverable in a six-stage process to produce an alternative to the ‘base-
bid’ Norman Foster FIFA World Cup design for the stadium; the target being to reduce the
construction cost from approximately QR5 billion to approximately QR2.8 billion, with the
minimum possible impact on Code Compliance and design intent. The core process involves
assessing the existing design, identifying potential value engineering and cost reduction
opportunities, evaluating the impact of these opportunities on the design intent and compliance
with codes, and preparing a pricing schedule for costing of the alternative design by the HBK-
CRCC JV. Ultimately, a submittal and presentation to The Supreme Committee for Delivery &
Legacy of the alternative design is expected to follow.
A team of discipline specialists, led by KEO International, was established and the following
specialist sub-consultants commissioned to contribute:
No. Consultant Scope
1. AFL (Neil Tootil) Architecture and Code & FIFA Compliance and
Food and Beverage gross areas as it relates to
FIFA Compliance
2. Hilson Moran (Matt Kitson) CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal and
Code Compliance
3. STRI (Lee Collier) Players Pitch and Code Compliance
4. J. D. Goode(Mark Coates) Security Strategy and Blast Analysis and Code
Compliance
5. Inhabit Engineering (Giuseppe Facade Engineering
Floriani)
6. OPS Structural Engineering (Mike Roof Structure and Steel
Stephens)
7. Crowd Dynamics (Paul Townsend) Crowd Modelling
In this Stage 4 Report, the team is tasked with following a structured evaluation process to
select those ideas that offer the potential for VE improvement while delivering the project’s goals
and considering performance requirements and resource limits. The team will develop the
selected ideas into alternatives (or proposals) with a sufficient level of documentation to allow
the Client to determine if the alternative should be implemented. The new options will be
sketched out and calculations/simulations will be carried out to thoroughly assess the impact of
Milestone 4
each VE option and validate that the solution can be implemented later in the detailed design
process.
Following review of the Stage 4 deliverables by the client, KEO will take on board comments
received from the JV and provide iterations to the VE items and incorporate into the Stage 5 –
Final Value Engineering Report.
Milestone 4
3.1.1 The main topics that contributes to Value engineering in the Stadium are the
following:
Milestone 4
Rationalize the façade profile to be constant all around that varies only at the top, achieving the
pringle effect as per the original design. It is worth mentioning that in the original design, façade
profile at the north/south and east/west are different.
Milestone 4
Conclusion: reduce the number of modular types in the façade and thus reduction in cost.
Increase Oculus opening by 22m in diameter that resulted in reduced roof area.
Pitch dimensions were optimized, change curved seating rows to rectangular.
Raise the pitch level to +5.0 for structural benefits as detailed in structure part below.
Remove the ceiling skin at the roof that resulted in exposed structure for which fire
protection will be required.
Optimize the seating and tiers arrangement to comply with FIFA minimum required for
the C value. This is detailed in item 3.2.2 for FIFA minimum requirements.
3.1.2 The secondary items that contribute to the Value Engineering can be summarized
as follows:
Straighten the façade profile at the plaza soffit level. Conclusion: easier construction
with minimum support framing.
Air tight all partitions facing the open area facing the vessel, thus, treating the façade as
shading element where the open internal space will be mechanically ventilated only.
Elevators to be all converted to Machine-room less with standard manufacturer finishes
for passengers and Service/firemen elevators.
Substantial glass areas were proposed in the original design for core cladding and other
areas. Suggest to convert 60 to 70& of these areas to dry wall lining or partition.
Fire curtains were proposed for escalator and concession areas. KEO propose to omit
60% of these curtains and replace with sprinklers or drop smoke curtain for around
600mm. fire curtain at concession area will be omitted as this is not considered as fire
zone. This will be further validated with the final fire strategy report.
Convert Emir circular elevator to square or rectangular glazing elevator.
Apart from Sky box or VIP areas, internal stone cladding can be changed to render paint
to match stone. Alternative products selection is covered in JV report.
Façade proposed materials are covered in the façade report below.
Rubber flooring can be changed to vinyl tiles. Alternative products selection is covered
in JV report.
Change the stainless steel railing with low iron glass to power coated aluminium and
standard temper or laminated annealed glass.
Bespoke metal or curved ceiling can be converted to manufacturer metal ceiling, GRG
or Gypsum.
Excluding Emir and VVIP areas, bespoke furniture can be changed to off-the-shelf
product. Alternative products selection is covered in JV report.
The stadium bowl design of the tendered Foster scheme is in itself a FIFA compliant bowl. All
minimum and maximised dimensions required by FIFA are met. However, there are
improvements to the design and layout of the bowl which can be incorporated, these are
represented on the design and detail drawings by AFL Architects contained within the Appendix.
These changes bring Value Engineering in terms of standardisation and construction of the
bowl, whilst improving the number of seat kills due to restricted views. The terrace layout of the
tendered scheme is based on a radial grid not only in the corners but also along the goal line
and touchlines. This type of design means the front row of the East / West & North / South
stands are somewhat further away from the pitch than the minimum FIFA dimensions and this
also presents a significant number of seat kills due to the pitch perimeter advertising hoarding.
Whilst the grid is radial it also means the terrace units in each structural bay are not of equal
Milestone 4
lengths, therefore leading to increase costs in the production of the pre cast concrete units and
splayed connection details for the main steelwork. Our value engineered scheme shows the
terracing of East / West & North / South being parallel to the pitch meaning the grid will be
perpendicular to terrace and pitch. This brings standardisation of pre cast concrete terrace units
along with simpler main steel connection details. Corner terracing is still required to be radial
matching the tendered scheme.
The current tendered scheme represents a large section of the terrace seating giving a C Value
of C60. This is a minimum standard required by FIFA but isn’t good practice as a low C Value
will encourage spectators to stand, which is against requirements. C60 is acceptable to an upper
tier terrace due to the angle of view to the pitch compared to the obstruction of the person sat
in front. The presented value engineered scheme gives C Values to the lower tier of C90 – C100
too East / West and C100 – C110 too North / South. Upper tier C Values are C60 too East /
West and C70 too North / South.
FIFA recommend a maximum viewing distance from the terrace seating to the diagonally
opposite corner flag of 190m, the tendered scheme has approximately 12% of the seating
outside this radius dimension. Our revised Value Engineered scheme reduces this figure to 5%.
This has been achieved by changing the footprint shape of the terracing too circular. This
revised shape has brought significant structural efficiencies and savings to overall areas to the
façade and roof design as noted within the section covered by OPS Structures.
3.2.4 Capacity
The tendered scheme and FIFA requires a net capacity of 80,000 spectators not including VIP,
VVIP’s and Media for the World Cup Final. The tendered scheme gives a gross capacity of
92,272.
The tendered scheme suffers greatly from seat kills due to obstructions from the pitch perimeter
advertising hoarding. These figures range from 3800 up to a maximum of 7500 seats depending
upon the location and slope of the pitch perimeter run off area. These figures are unacceptable
and may be discounted from the net figure depending upon the severity. Our Value engineered
terrace layout gives a Gross capacity of 91,355. Due to the redesigned terrace layout being
parallel and closer to the touch and goal lines this has reduced the number of seat kills from the
advertising hoarding to a maximum of 1118. When comparing this number with the tendered
scheme this suggests we can further reduce the gross capacity, this needs to be carried out in
the detail design stage.
FIFA requires minimum of 2 video screens of at least 70m2 and a format of 16:9 which are able
to be viewed by all spectators. The tendered scheme shows a structural complicated cut out
section to the front of the upper tiers of the north and south stands where a screen is housed to
each. Our VE scheme has removed these cut outs and replaced with terracing. The video
screens are now located under the main roof of the wall to the rear of the terrace. Due to the
roof structure and necessity for all spectators to view the screens we require a total of 4 screens,
one for each corner diagonally opposite each other.
Milestone 4
Access to Vip / VViP lounges are from west stand level 0 access road via a private stair and lift
core with access also available at podium level 1. Lounges are located to the rear of the lower
tier at level 2 with seating directly available from their lounge for ViP guests. VViP lounge is at
Level 3 with again direct terrace access to their seating section. Tender scheme occupancy
numbers for VViP was 300 and for ViP 1700, this is in excess of the requirements of the FIFA
5th Edition. This documentation this has requirement for 150 VViP and 1350 VViP therefore we
have included this within our design.
The tendered scheme basis the lounge areas on a floor space factor of 1.8m2 per person for
all lounges. Minimum FIFA area requirements are for 1m2 per person therefore the revised VE
scheme acknowledges these criteria and the lounges are designed to 1m2 per person. We have
acknowledged the level of importance of the VViP lounge and have used the same area per
person as the tendered scheme to this lounge, 1.8m2/pers. The VViP lounge is located centrally
to the Sky Box level. Terrace seating direct from the lounge into their own segregated section.
Hospitality and Sky Box occupancies are required by FIFA as a percentage of the gross
capacity, 8%. This figure is then used to determine the amount of Sky Box occupants, which is
30% of the figure. Our value engineered scheme is based on these figures.
The tender design shows Hospitality seats to the rear section of the lower tier and within the
Value Engineered scheme this principle is followed. In the tender design the hospitality
spectators are offered pitch views around the stadium, this is not a FIFA requirement and as
such we have limited the amount of pitch side glazing.
Hospitality Lounges within the tendered scheme are based on 1.8m2/person, our value
engineered follows the requirements of the FIFA 5th Edition documentation requiring
1m2/person.
Sky Boxes occupy a ring at level 3 in the middle of upper and lower tiers. Seating is direct from
the Sky Box.
We have undertaken a detailed review of the tender scheme’s area schedule and compared
this to the FIFA 5th edition minimum requirements (or used international best practice where
silent). This has been organised into a schedule referenced SOA-FIFA WCF (Rev P5).
The schedule is organised vertically by FIFA World Cup requirements in Category order.
Milestone 4
Then to clarify where these parameters for the required room & sizes come from there are two
columns.
Design Requirement Origin: simply states whether FIFA or the SC requires the existence
of the room. For example, we have retained key spaces such as prayer rooms from the
SC requirements. Toilets will also be required in all spaces even if not explicitly stated
by the FIFA 5th edition.
Guidance Document used for Area: in the following preferential order. When the
previous guidance document is silent the next one will be used and so on.
Here we go back to basics with the FIFA 5th edition and broad location that each space is
required:
(S) Stadium
(SB) Seating Bowl
(IP) Inner Perimeter
(OP) Outer Perimeter
(P) Precinct
(HV) Hospitality Village
We then use a combination of the FIFA 5th edition and Best Practice to locate the spaces on
the best level within the proposed VE scheme.
This includes references for the Room Code, location and level for the original tender scheme.
Milestone 4
FIFA 5th edition specifies whether the space can be temporary or permanent and which phase
of the construction that the space is required. This is particularly useful if the client is wishing to
have some sections of the venue demountable in legacy or adding some facilities as Event
Overlay.
The schedule fully demonstrates the space reductions possible if the VE scheme is built to the
FIFA 5th edition minimums with the exception of certain essential SC requirements such as
prayer rooms and pitch perimeter setting out. The key area savings are as follows:
General Spectator Areas – a saving of up to 15,000m2. This is predominantly due to
reduced seat kills and an overall reduction of gross seating numbers generating less
concourse. We have also reduced the requirement for large ventilated entrance lobby
areas for the General Spectators (a result of the tournament being held in the winter
months).
Players Areas – a saving of up to 1,000m2. This is primarily due to the omission of the
additional 2 dressing rooms which are only a recommendation for legacy multipurpose
stadia.
Ceremonies – a saving of up to 500m2. The tender scheme included a large space inside
the stadium for the ceremonies, we recommend that the majority of this space is built
outside the stadium as event overlay.
Back of house compound – a saving of up to 5,000m2. Using Best practice for a venue
this size and assuming all further FIFA event logistics is Event Overlay in the Precinct.
Hospitality Areas – a saving of up to 12,000m2. There are large areas of additional
circulation including plaza level ventilated entrance lobbies and support areas that are
simply not required. The lounges are also larger than the FIFA 5th edition, primarily
because the SC has placed large space factors on the design. We have retained
entrance lobbies and support but at a much more sensible level and designed to the
minimum space factors.
VIP & VVIP Areas - a saving of up to 7,000m2. As with hospitality there are large areas
of additional circulation including plaza level ventilated entrance lobbies and support
areas that are simply not required. The lounges are also larger than the FIFA 5th edition,
primarily because the SC has placed large space factors on the design. We have
retained entrance lobbies and support but at a much more sensible level and designed
to the minimum space factors. The VVIP Lounge is the Emir Suite and as per FIFA 5 th
Edition there is no requirement to double up.
Security Service - a saving of up to 21,000m2. We have located the essential FIFA
requirements into the Stadium. It is assumed that any event specific requirements are
all part of the Event Overlay in the Precinct.
General Circulation in non-departmental areas - a saving of up to 17,000m2. General
reduction due to building size and level reduction.
Plant Areas – a saving of up to 49,000m2. The detail of the saving will be covered
separately in sections 5, 7 & 8 of this report, but essentially it is achieved by re-modelling
the thermal environment in the winter months and the resultant omission of large areas
of non-required cooling plant.
Total Stadium – when the whole schedule is taken into account, including the savings
above, there is an overall saving of up to 127,400m2. These potential area reductions in
the VE Scheme would need to be fully tested and developed in much more detail going
forward but nonetheless offer significant savings to the Tendered Scheme.
Milestone 4
4.1.1 Introduction
The original design proposed to have the pitch level at -0.3 QND, with stepped basements
around the pitch up to the plaza level of +8.55 QND. The actual ground water level recorded in
geotechnical investigation report is -6 to -7 QND level in 2015. Earlier ground water level
recorded in geotechnical investigation report was +1 QND level in 2005.
Because of continuous dewatering in and around Lusail, the groundwater level lowered
considerably. Once all dewatering stopped, it is expected that the ground water level may raise
up to +3.5 QND level. Urban recharge associated with development of surrounding area, in the
form of widespread irrigation of green areas and infrastructure leakage, may lead to further
increases in groundwater level.
Therefore, Arup assumed to keep the design ground water level as +5.0 QND level. Further
geotechnical investigation is required at later stage to verify above assumption. Considering
this high design ground water level, it would be ideal to propose all possible structural elements
above the ground water level to avoid the uplift.
Hence there is a Value Engineering opportunity to raise the pitch level so that the uplift can be
avoided.
Therefore, the key VE items identified for the concrete sub structure include:
Raising the pitch level above the design ground water level
Avoid tension piles under the pitch
Avoid raft and pile caps under the pitch.
Reduce the number of basement floor and limit it to one floor at the pitch level.
As mentioned above we propose to raise the pitch level to +5.0 QND or at the design ground
water level. Exact pitch level can be fixed at next stage based on the design ground water level.
For the time being, it is assumed to propose the pitch level as +5.0 QND.
By raising the pitch level to +5.0 QND or at the design ground water level, we have avoided
considerable number of tension piles under the pitch. In addition, we have also avoided raft
under the pitch including number of pile caps. Moreover, by avoiding the uplift and tension, we
have overcome the dewatering requirement in general.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Figure 4-2: Arup proposed pile caps and raft shown under pitch.
Milestone 4
By raising the pitch level, we have also avoided stepped basement around the pitch and
proposed uniform one level of basement at +5.0 QND level. With this proposal, the plaza level
or the ground floor will be at +12.1 QND level. Because of the raise in the pitch level and
removal of the stepped basement, some tension piles under these basements were also
omitted.
Figure 4-3: Arup proposed section showing stepped basement areas which are rationalized.
Similarly, pile caps for these piles and thicker raft proposed for these areas were also omitted
and reduced. The retaining walls proposed for the stepped basement around the stadium were
also considerably reduced and simplified. Since there is no uplift and no design ground water
level to be considered, retaining wall design is optimized and accordingly thickness and
reinforcement ratio were reduced.
Milestone 4
Figure 4-4: Arup proposed basement areas are omitted because of reduction in bowl size.
Similarly, raft thicknesses for the basement is also optimized because of no uplift and tension
forces. Therefore, its thickness and reinforcement ratio were also reduced. Finally, pile caps
under the columns were also value engineered because of raised level and hence its steel
reinforcement were also optimized.
4.1.3 Grids
The framing of the bowl and associated structure will follow the orthogonal grids set out by the
architects as part of this Value Engineering (VE) exercise. This orthogonal grid system results
in a regular arrangement of the frame, with the framing of the lower tiers repeated for the full
bowl.
Milestone 4
The original design plaza level was at +8.55 QND. In our value engineering proposal because
of raise in pitch level, the plaza level (which is level 1) is proposed at +12.1 QND. In Arup/Foster
plans it was radial grids and the spans were not typical and we proposed to change to
orthogonal grids in general, so that on average internal columns are spaced at 7.5m centres
approximately.
All internal columns are proposed as circular columns with typical 1000mm diameter. The
proposed framing plan is similar to Arup scheme with beams in one direction of size 900mm
wide x 750mm deep. Typically slab thickness is proposed as 275mm thick.
The original design for the superstructure to form the terrace stands and accommodation areas
of this stadium was designed in reinforced concrete. Changing the seating geometry from a
radial to an orthogonal grid permits a more efficient seating plan which in turn allows a significant
reduction in bowl size. Because of reduction in bowl size, the volume of concrete and amount
of steel reinforcement will be reduced on a prorata basis.
In addition to the reduction in the bowl size the number of levels are also rationalized because
of lesser requirements of plant space due to switching the tournament to winter. All the floors
from level 1 to level 6 are proposed as cast in place Reinforced Concrete (RC) structure.
Alternatively Post Tensioned (PT) option is also studied which will have the following
advantages:
For this span and grid system, PT slab will reduce the required slab thickness to around
220mm as compare to conventional cast in place RC structure
In terms of weight it will be light construction compared with other concrete systems
Due to reduction in slab thickness with PT option, foundation load will also reduce and
there will be some cost reduction
In addition, due to lesser self-weight the seismic load will also reduce as it is
proportionate to the mass of the building.
Span limitation – It is structurally very efficient for long span
Even though it has lot of advantages as mentioned above, it has the following disadvantages
as well:
This system will limit any future slab penetration and drilling work in the slab, due to
possible damages to PT tendons.
All services openings, penetrations, etc. has to be predefined well in advance and has
less flexibility for the future penetration and making it less compatible with the Legacy
use of the structure.
In case of basements, stressing of the tendons will require special attention and design
consideration due to basement walls all around.
Less volume of typical floors may increase the cost of mobilisation and construction.
Mainly because of the legacy option in mind which requires lot of future penetration PT system
was not selected.
Similarly, another alternative option of steel composite decking slab was also studied which will
have the following advantages:
Milestone 4
For this span and grid system, 80 mm concrete on 80 mm steel deck on 533mm steel
beams will work
In terms of time, it can be quickly erected
In terms of weight, it will be lighter in construction compared with concrete systems.
Lighter construction will also reduce the cost of foundation.
Regarding span limitation, it is structurally efficient for very long spans.
This is also well suited for super-structure transfer columns (if any) as columns can be
transferred through steel beams.
Even though it has lot of advantages as mentioned above it have the following disadvantages
as well:
Difficulties in providing MEP openings in metal deck slab as compare to concrete slabs
In terms of fire rating it will be difficult to achieve the required fire rating fireproofing is
required which lead to extra construction cost
Regarding maintenance, it is susceptible to corrosion and would require periodic
maintenance
In terms of cost, it is comparatively high in cost with other options
It would be difficult to achieve the frequency level of 6Hz required.
Mainly because of cost and achieving the frequency requirement this system is not selected.
Considering the above options, we have decided to continue with the conventional cast in place
RC structure.
Figure 4-5: Proposed reinforced concrete framing plan for concourse levels.
Milestone 4
Part of the Level 5 and 6 slab which is projecting beyond the building line below is proposed to
have a steel framing. We are utilizing the external steel columns supporting the roof and façade
to support this extended portion. In addition, the complete Levels 7 and 8 are also proposed as
steel structure.
Figure 4-6: Proposed section showing the concrete and steel framing plan for concourse levels.
Milestone 4
For the legacy mode it is planned to retain floors up to level 6. Therefore, it will be ideal to have
concrete structure up to level 6 and steel structure above level 6, which can be easily removed
for the legacy mode. Similar to the plaza level the framing plans up to level 6 is proposed as
one way RC slab of 275mm thick typically. The beams are spanning in one direction of size
900mm wide x 750mm deep in general. It is proposed to have a circular internal column of size
1000mm diameter typically.
The proposed 24 number of cores will be retained as it is as per the original design which will
be used for the lateral restraint of the stadium. The height of the cores is almost similar to the
original design and therefore the wall thicknesses and the steel reinforcement will remain the
same at this stage.
As per original design there will be 8 numbers of expansion joints dividing the building into 8
different buildings with double columns between the expansion joint.
As explained above the VE proposal is for a steel-framed construction for part of Level 5 and 6
for the extended portion of building line from below and complete floor of Level 7 and above
because it is easily demountable for the legacy stage.
Milestone 4
The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of Plumbing systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the original
design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and recommended
design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and that it meets
the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and performance.
5.2 Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of
alternate material
The potable cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-
DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design
report for the project.
In the original design, the potable cold water system is being fed from the potable water storage
tank. It supplies water to wash basins, ablution taps, sinks, showers, dishwashers, etc. Drinking
fountains shall be using bottled dispenser.
FIFA and SC Technical Recommendations and Requirements suggest the sustainable water
supply system and strategy on achieving an overall reduction in total water demand through the
specification of water efficient fittings & fixtures as summarized on the Stage – 1 Design Analysis
table as part of the report.
Although the original design appears to be generally in accordance with the code and FIFA &
SC requirements, options and methodologies shall be employed to reduce overall water
consumption in complete compliance with GSAS requirements.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for potable cold water system:
Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, low flow fixtures, low flush
urinals/grey water treatment, water savings valves, automatic shut off valves, sensors,
etc.
A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the potable water
demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described in
the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.
5.3 Non-Potable Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection
of alternate material
The non-potable cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design
report for the project.
In the original design, the non-potable cold water system is being fed from the non-potable
storage tank. It supplies water to water closets, urinals, bib taps, etc. The original design
appears to be in accordance with the code.
FIFA Technical Recommendations and Requirements suggest the sustainable water supply
system and strategy on achieving an overall reduction in total water demand through the
Milestone 4
specification of water efficient fittings & fixtures as summarized on the Stage – 1 Design Analysis
table as part of the report.
SC requires the use of recycled waste water such as treated grey water and captured A/C
condensates as part of the GSAS sustainability requirement.
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for non-potable cold water
system:
Options and methodologies to be employed to reduce overall water consumption in
complete compliance with GSAS requirements. This is to specify in detail the required
water efficient appliances, low flow fixtures, low flush urinals/grey water treatment, water
savings valves, automatic shut off valves, sensors, etc.
A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the non-potable
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.
The TSE water supply system is described under section 5.11 of Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.
In the original design, the TSE water supply system is being fed from ASHGHAL.
SC requires the use of TSE for external landscaping (Infrastructure scope of work).
Conclusion - Based on the above recommendation, a 50% reduction in the overall water
consumption in the building can be achieved.
5.5 Hot water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of alternate
material
The hot water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-DR-RF-AL-
7205 and described under section 5.11 of the Public Health schematic design report for the
project.
In the original design, the hot water system is being fed from potable storage tank. The hot
water system consists of local point - of - use direct electric generation or local hot water storage
calorifiers with associated local secondary return circulation systems. It is generally proposed
to provide hot water to EMIR, VVIP & VIP areas, dressing areas, hospitality box serveries,
kitchen areas, showers (where required) and any other areas deemed to require hot water. The
original design water heating load requirement is 530 kw.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for hot water system:
Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, water savings valves, automatic
shut off valves, sensors, etc.
A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the chilled cold
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
The new water heating load requirement is approximately 400 kw.
Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
Conclusion – The above opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.
5.6 Chilled Cold Water System - Reduction of plant room areas and selection of
alternate material
The chilled cold water system is indicated on the Public Health drawing DR-AL-01 – 7200 and
described under section 5.11 of the Public Health schematic design report for the project.
In the original design, chilled cold water system supplies water to selected end users within the
stadium. The provision of chilled water shall be through local generation of chilled water via
plate heat exchanger (PHX), chilled water storage vessel (semi-storage type) and secondary
return circulation pumping system. This will serve Emir, VVIP & VIP areas, dressing areas for
players/teams & pitch officials, music artist dressing, kitchen areas and other area deemed to
require chilled cold water supply requirement. The cold feed supply to the chilled cold water
system is fed from the potable water supply system. The load in district cooling system is 988
Kw.
Milestone 4
SC requires the use of low water demand process cooling equipment (Closed circuit cooling
system).
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for chilled cold water system:
Specify in detail the required water efficient appliances, water savings valves, automatic
shut off valves, sensors, etc.
A reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) reduces the chilled cold
water demand load in the plumbing system and spatial criteria in the project as described
in the design analysis & VE reports and drawings (Area Comparison between Original
design & VE Option proposal) as appended under Appendix A3 of this validation report.
The new cooling load will be 790 Kw.
Material type for all plumbing equipment and pipe works involved to be reviewed if
possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
Conclusion – The above VE opportunities will lead for a 20-30 % area reduction in plant room
spaces, 30% reduction in the overall water consumption in the building and 20 - 30% material
cost reduction if procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers.
The water storage system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-DR-
RF-AL-7200 and described under section 5.11 (Public Health) of the Schematic design report
for the project.
In the original design, the water storage system will consist of bulk potable & non-potable water
tanks and pitch irrigation water tank which will be generally of concrete construction. The
exception to this being for the dedicated potable & non-potable tanks serving the Emir suite,
condensate collection tanks and roof cleaning tanks which will be of sectional pre-insulated
GRP panel construction.
Milestone 4
Bulk potable and non-potable water tanks will be fed from KHARAMAA main water network.
and will supply water to the stadium. The pitch irrigation water tank will receive source of water
from the non-potable water tank which is also designed to receive collected condensate water
from HVAC equipment in the building. The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and
international codes requirement.
Based on the supplied information relating to precinct potable water demand per Qatar 2022
Supreme Committee report (Table 5), the total potable water indicated is 918 m3/day (1836 m3/
2 days). It is based on a population of 35,792 only with 60% potable and 40% non-potable.
Latest data received from the designer indicates an occupancy of 88,873 persons which is more
than double of the original design occupancy (35,792 persons). This big discrepancy between
the old and new occupancy requirement will impact the design for the water storage in the
project which will require 2,000 m3/day (4,000 m3/2 days). Refer to attached
tabulation/estimation (Table 5 -Precinct Mains Potable Water Demands) under Appendix A3 of
this validation report.
The domestic water booster pumping system is described under specification section
220000/20 and on design drawings for the project.
In the original design, booster pumps are being specified as packaged multi-stage pump type
units, each to include multi-stage inverter controlled quiet running variable speed pumps
Milestone 4
(minimum duty, support & standby), inlet & outlet manifold headers, integral control panel &
isolator, accumulator vessel(s) & associated isolation valves, outlet pressure controls, low level
cut-out switches, flexible connections/anti-vibration mounts all to be mounted on a common skid
base frame. The power load requirement for the domestic water pumping system is 180 Kw.
SC requires water and power savings thru building operation of this equipment.
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed for water supply system:
Material type of booster pumps and pipe works involved to be reviewed if possible for
replacement with cheaper but approvable products.
Capacities of booster pumps will definitely reduce due to a reduction in total built up area
from 212,328 to 118,218 m2 and removal of basement floors. The new power load
requirement will be 150 Kw
Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for 20% water/energy savings and contribute
for a material cost savings of 20 - 30% to the project if procured from cheaper alternate approved
manufacturer.
In the original design, the pitch irrigation system is being fed from pitch irrigation bulk storage
tank.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, it is recommended for the rain water to be captured and used for pitch irrigation
system, supply of water hose bibs for cleaning purposes and for external irrigation.
Conclusion - The above VE opportunities will lead for a 10% water savings and contribute
towards meeting GSAS requirement.
5.10 Combined Building Drainage System – Change of Design to Twin System for
Grey Water Application
The combined drainage system is described under specification section 220000/35, design
report 5.11.1.4 and on design drawings for the project.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities and design changes are proposed for drainage
system:
The original design for drainage system will be revised with a single pipe system (Foul
+ waste) to be changed to twin pipe system in order to collect/separate all discharges
from wash basins, showers, floor drains and use as influent waste for grey water
treatment system for treatment and the product water (effluent) will be re-used for supply
of water to water closets, urinals, etc.
To change gravity drains from metal/clay to UPVC.
Performance capacities of sump pumps (approximately 20 sets) will reduce based on
the received stadium area reduction from 212,328 to 118,218 m2 and removal of
basement floors.
Conclusion - This will lead for a 40 % water savings and contribute towards GSAS sustainability
requirements. It will also contribute for a material cost savings of 20 - 30% to the project if
materials are to be procured from cheaper alternate approved manufacturers. But, this will add
cost for having a twin pipe system and grey water treatment plant which may offset savings for
cheaper materials as proposed above for drainage system.
Milestone 4
The grey water system is described under section 5.11 of the Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.
Based on the schematic design report, under original design, further consideration has been
given for the use of grey water system in the project. But, design drawings have not shown this
system in the layout and schematics.
SC requires grey water capture from basins, showers, appliances for treatment and recycle for
non-potable water use.
In the VE design, Grey Water Treatment system will be considered as part of GSAS requirement
to treat waste water and the product to be re-used for supply of water to water closets, urinals,
etc.
Conclusion - The above requirement will lead for a 40% water savings and contribute towards
GSAS sustainability requirements. But, this will add cost for having a grey water treatment plant
which may offset savings for water consumptions and cheaper materials as proposed above for
drainage system.
The condensate recycling system is described under specification section 220000/22 and on
design drawings for the project.
In the original design, condensate discharge from mechanical AHUs and FCUs will be captured
into satellite condensate storage tanks, then brought to the non-potable water tank, pass thru
treatment system for recycling and used for pitch irrigation and flushing of WCs and urinals.
There are 20 sets of satellite condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets.
The total power requirement for this system is 15 kw.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, satellite condensate water storage tanks and booster pumps will reduce in
quantities and capacities due to estimated HVAC cooling load reduction of 50% from the original
design and reduction in built up area as proposed by Architectural. There will be 20 sets of
satellite condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets. The total power
requirement for this system will be approximately 10 kw.
Conclusion - The above requirement will lead for a material cost savings of approximately 40%
to the project and plant space savings.
The rain water drainage system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-
DR-RF-AL-72001 and described under section 5.11 of the Public Health of the Schematic
design report for the project.
In the original design, the roof is divided to North & South stands. Each stand has 3 nos. of 900
diameter vertical pipe. Rain water outlets(RWO) are tapered and connected to 600 diameter
individual downspout which will be discharged to external drainage network.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, the following VE opportunities are proposed and considered for rain water
drainage system:
Rain water to be captured, filtered and reused for irrigation and flushing of WCs & urinals
as per SC requirement and schematic diagram below.
Sizes of roof drains (6 nos. - North & South stands) and downpipes (6 nos.- North &
South stands) will reduce from 600 to 500 mm, diameter based on the VE proposed
reduced roof area for the stadium of approximately 10%.
Milestone 4
Conclusion - Based on the above recommendations, 20 - 30% material cost reduction can be
achieved due to reduced stadium roof area and if materials are to be procured from cheaper
alternate approved manufacturers.
The roof cleaning system is described under project specification section 220000/21 – 1.4.4.
In the original design, a provision has been included for roof cleaning/wash down purposes in
the form of dedicated local break tanks and associated pump sets which will serve numbers of
hose reel points within each quadrant at roof level. These will be supplied from the non-potable
water system.
In the VE design, sizes of tanks and pump sets will reduce based on the VE proposed reduced
roof area for the stadium which will lead for a 20-30 % material cost reduction and if materials
are to be procured from alternate manufacturers.
Conclusion - Based on the above recommendations, 20 - 30% material cost reduction can be
achieved due to reduced stadium roof area and if materials are to be procured from cheaper
alternate approved manufacturers.
The leak detection system is described under section 5.10.9 (Public Health) of the Schematic
design report for the project.
In the original design, the leak detection system is generally described to be provided for
incoming water line, tanks and wet areas.
In the VE design, leak extensive detection system will be employed to quickly locate and
efficiently identify water leakage points per GSAS requirement.
Milestone 4
Conclusion - Unnecessary water leakages can be avoided which will lead for a reduced water
consumption of 30% and energy savings of 20%. But, extensive leak detection system design
for storage tanks, pipe line distributions, etc. as required per GSAS will add cost to the project.
Metering and sub-metering system is indicated on the Public Health drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-DR-RF-AL-7200 and described under specification section 220000 (Public Health General
Requirements), 1.4.21.
In the original design, provision of meters and sub-meters are required in the water services
installations:
Incoming potable water mains to measure overall consumption within the building
Inlet supplies to each of the main tanks to measure overall potable/non-potable/irrigation
consumption to each tank
Boosted supplies on the potable and non-potable distribution system serving the building
to measure overall consumption by each of these two (2) systems
Condensate return lines to measure how much water collected from recycled
condensate
Main risers to identify usage around the building
Chilled cold water of the cold feed supplies to each local chilled water storage vessel
and heat exchange station
Hot water of the cold feed supplies to each local hot water calorifier station
Main Kitchen all main water services supplies
Milestone 4
SC requires the provision of water metering system as one of the GSAS criteria address aspects
related to Water.
Conclusion - Based on the above requirements, this will lead for a reduced water consumption
in the building and help to achieve GSAS 4star rating requirement. This item will have no cost
impact implication.
5.17 Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System – Water and Energy Savings
The sanitary area shut off valve system is described under specification section 220000/29 for
the project.
In the original design, automatic shut off valves shall be provided on all water supplies to
spectator toilet areas - linked to passive infrared type presence detection as part of leak
detection system.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, it is recommended to review the material type of all plumbing materials and
equipment involved in the project if possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable
products.
Conclusion - This will contribute for a material cost savings of 20-30 %, reduced water
consumption of 30% and energy savings of 20%.
Internal pipework installations are described under specification section 220000/26, 1.4.11 for
the project
The above installations are required to comply with QCS and Kahramaa standards.
In the VE design, material types for pipework installations have to be reviewed if possible for
replacement with cheaper but approvable types.
Conclusion - By using another type of pipe line material and alternate manufacturers, the cost
can be reduced by 20-30%.
Building Management System is described under section 5.10.9 (Public Health) of the
Schematic design report for the project.
In the original design, BMS will provide automatic control and monitoring of public health
systems equipment. It will be capable of interfacing with systems/equipment utilising industry
standard protocols including BACnet, CANbus, DALI, KNX and other industry related standards.
Milestone 4
In the VE design, material required for automatic control and monitoring systems of all public
health equipment have to be reviewed if possible for replacement with cheaper but approvable
types to contribute for a project cost savings.
GSAS compliance requirements are described under specification section 220000/15, 1.2 for
the project.
In the original design, the following systems are not considered or shown in the schematic
design drawings which are points to achieve GSAS 4star rating for the project.
Grey Water Collection and Treatment System.
Rain water capturing for pitch irrigation system.
TSE supply to pitch irrigation and irrigation to external landscaping.
In the VE design, the following systems are proposed to be part of design per GSAS
sustainability requirement for the project.
Rain Water Capture for pitch irrigation
TSE supply to pitch and external irrigation (Infra scope)
Potable/Non-Potable Water System with water efficient fixtures and appliances
Water Use sub-metering
In the original design, there is an Issued Tender Approved Vendors’ list for the project.
Milestone 4
The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of fire protection systems
as described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the
original design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and
recommended design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and
NFPA that it meets the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and
performance.
In original design, the proposed of Fire water pumps designed exceed the NFPA and QCD
requirements. Capacity shown as following:
Per original design, two sets of fire pumps: one for sprinklers and second for standpipe are
provided in the fire pump room, which is not required by NFPA and QCD.
The original design is exceeding the NFPA and QCD requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme
committee have recommended the design exceed QCD requirements.
Per original design, the proposed of concrete fire water storage tank is designed for 2 hours’
duration.
The original design is exceeding the NFPA and QCD requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme
committee have recommended the design exceed QCD requirements.
Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to design the storage fire water tank for 1
hour instead of 2 hours.
6.4 Generator and fuel tank room– Replace Foam (deluge) with extra hazard
sprinkler system
Per original design, the proposed of generator and fuel tank rooms are designed for Foam
system for areas with flammable liquid.
Milestone 4
Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to use alternative fire protection system for
the generator and fuel tank rooms by standard response sprinklers with density 0.4 gpm/ft² over
2000 ft² (Extra hazard- Group-2) with the separate zone control valve instead of deluge system.
The proposed design is code compliant (NFPA and QCD).
Since there is no Foam (deluge) system used in the generator and fuel tank rooms (with total
numbers 4 rooms.) the cost can be reduced by 60-70%.
6.5 Fire water distribution system for branch fire pipes materials– Replace with
alternative material
In the original design, automatic wet pipe distribution system is designed by using steel pipes
with groove ends.
Conclusion, in the VE design, it is recommended to use alternative type of fire protection pipes
except MAIN RISERS pipes, ASTM A52 galvanized steel ERW for branch pipes. The proposed
design is code compliant (NFPA and QCD).
Using ASTM A52 galvanized steel ERW for the branches fire pipes the cost can be reduced
by 25-30%.
It is proposed to use USA / Japan/ UK brands specified - Alternate manufacturers from Europe
/ Asia to be considered.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-30%.
Milestone 4
The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of HVAC systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention to validate that the original
design is in complete compliance with relevant standards, regulations and recommended
design practices modified by local practice and code requirements of Qatar and that it meets
the FIFA and SC requirements of constructability, modularity and performance.
The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 130 MW based on the CFD modelling which is based on outside air condition dry bulb
temperature of 36.8 Degree C and Wet bulb temperature of 33.4 Degree C.
Based on the proposed new CFD analysis the cooling load will be further reduced to followings:
VE option -01: The cooling load capacity will be 72.0 MW which includes cooling of all
tiers (CFD result).
VE option -02: The cooling load capacity will be 60.0 MW which doesn’t include cooling
of upper tiers (CFD result).
Conclusion: VE option -02 will be considered based on the CFD model results shown in the
section 11 VE of CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance and Appendix – A
section A-10. The cooling load capacity are calculated based on winter condition outside air
temperature 30.4 Degree C DB and 27.0 Degree C WB. A details calculation sheet is attached
in the appendix – A, section A – 5.
The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows the flow rate of 25 L/s for each spectator seat.
With reference to SC comments, Bowl Cooling: under seat air distribution is sized for 25 l/s per
seat: sidewall adjustable air grills mounted in the seating riser are typically limited to 9.5 l/s
each. These criteria are based on:
consideration of how close the under seat diffusers are to people
trying to avoid drafts on people's legs
the limited availability of diffusers that are specifically designed for under seat
applications
The original design is based on summer condition. 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in
some area due to over design conditions. The design checks indicate based on winter condition,
we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas. The CFD model will be based on the
10 L/s per person for lower tier, 20 L/s per person for mid-tier and no cooling for upper tier.
Milestone 4
Conclusion: The original design air flow rates is 2297.125 M3/s for the tiers (Lower, Mid &
Upper). The CFD modelling verification of the original design (Summer conditions) confirm that
the stadium is over designed and over cooled. Based on the winter condition, a VE opportunity
to reduce the air flow rates 354.380 M3/s, which is 84 % reduction on air flow rates fir tiers. Due
to the reduction in air flow rates, the air handling unit’s will also reduce in quantity. (Refer the
section 10 CFD Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance for the complete CFD
report). The detailed air flow rates calculation data sheet is attached in the appendix – A, section
A – 5.
The proposed area for the new concourse (173000 M2) will be lesser then original design
(222000 M2) and also floor levels have been reduced. This will reduce the smoke management
zones on the original design by 16 Nos.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete 16 Nos. smoke extract fans for the concourse levels.
7.3.2 Fire within the roof void – Smoke Extract Fan Deletion
The smoke extract fans provided on the roof void are not required. 50 % opening in the roof
void should be adequate for smoke removal as per QCDD requirements.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete all smoke extract fans for the roof void.
The energy transfer station (ETS) equipment are selected for 180 MW capacity (2 sets 90 MW,
each sets consisting of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) shown on the ARUP report Document no
TDO-16-TTC-0018 in the mechanical specification section, no 220000 / 29.
The cooling will reduce drastically for this project based on winter conditions. The PHEX
equipment's will be sized based on the 60.0MW cooling capacity.
Conclusion: The PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment will be sized based on the proposed
new CFD analyses. The revised plate heat exchanger will be sized for 60 MW (2 sets 30.0 MW,
Milestone 4
each sets consistent of 4 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby). A details calculation sheet is attached in
the appendix – A, section A – 5.
The chilled water pumps are selected for 180 MW capacity (2 sets 90 MW, each sets consisting
of 16 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) shown on the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018.
in the mechanical specification section, no 220000 / 29.
The cooling will reduce drastically for this project based on winter conditions. The chilled water
pumps will be sized based on the 60.0MW cooling capacity.
Conclusion: The chilled water pumps will be sized based on the proposed new CFD analyses.
The revised chilled water pumps will be sized for 60 MW (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent
of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby) A details calculation sheet is attached in the appendix – A,
section A – 5.
The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 130 MW. Bowl air handling unit quantities (553 Nos.) shown on the mechanical
schematic drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7126 are selected based on the CFD
modelling which is based on outside air condition dry bulb temperature of 36.8 Degree C and
Wet bulb temperature of 33.4 Degree C.
The new cooling load capacity for the bowl will be 35.0 MW only. (Refer the section 10 CFD
Modelling of Isothermal, Thermal & Code Compliance for the complete CFD report)
Based on the revised cooling load capacity from the CFD results. The number of AHU's will be
reduced to approximately 200 Nos. for tier cooling as follows:
Conclusion: A VE opportunity to reduce the air handling units to 353 Nos. The 65 % percentage
of cooling reduction in the revised CFD model result. A details calculation sheet is attached in
the appendix – A, section A – 07.
Cross plate heat exchanger on the air handling units is shown in the mechanical drawing no
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7132.
Milestone 4
Cross plate heat exchanger will be replaced with Thermal Heat Recovery wheel to save the
space and cost. Using thermal heat recovery wheel will have better thermal heat performance
due to latent and sensible heat recovery.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to save AHU cost and space by replacing the cross plate heat
exchanges to thermal recovery wheel on the air handling units.
Having sound attenuator on the AHU section will add more cost to the air handling units.
Conclusion: Sound attenuator section in the AHUs should be deleted. This will reduce cost and
also plant space for the air handling units. The sound attenuators will be in provided in the
supply and return air ducts
7.4.6 Fan Coil Units - Air Conditioning for Toilet areas - Deletion
Cooling the toilets via fan coil units are shown in the mechanical drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-
T-ME-PL-04-7153
Fan coil units are not required for the toilets. The exhaust ventilation air make-up will be supplied
from the adjacent space / treated fresh air to provide required comfort.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete the fan coil units provided for toilet areas.
Two sets of stairwell pressurization fans (1 duty + 1 standby x 2 Nos) are provided in each stair
well on the mechanical drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203.
2 sets of stairwell pressurization fans are not required per NFPA / QCDD requirements.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to have only 1 no. (duty only) for staircase pressurization fans
for each stair well.
Standby fans / motors for the stairwell pressurization system shown on the mechanical drawings
no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 are not required as per QCDD.
The staircase pressurization fans will be provided 1 no duty with standby power back.
Sound attenuators provided for the smoke management system shown on the mechanical
drawings no C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 are not required.
Conclusion A VE opportunity is to delete the sound attenuators from the smoke management
system.
Milestone 4
Smoke stop lobbies require only pressurization system shown on the mechanical drawings no
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ME-AL-AZ-7203 and not the exhaust system.
The smoke stop lobbies will be provided with pressurization fan only as per QCDD
requirements.
Conclusion: A VE opportunity is to delete the exhaust fans on the smoke stop lobbies.
All mechanical plant spaces are indicated on the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
and also on the all mechanical drawings.
Based on the VE option - 2 CFD model report. The Cooling load for this project will be based
on winter conditions. The cooling load capacity was drastically reduced from 180.0 MW to 60.0
MW.
Conclusion: All the mechanical plant space (ETS room, AHU room etc.) will be reduced based
on winter condition for 60.0 MW cooling capacity. A detailed HVAC system plant spaces (Based
on original and VE option design) data sheet is attached on the appendix – A, section A – 05.
7.5.2 Seat Air Distribution for Spectator areas – Air Plenum and Air Outlet Reduction
The cooling load calculation as indicated in the ARUP report Document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows the flow rate is 25 L/s for each spectator seat.
With reference to SC commends, Bowl Cooling: under seat air distribution is sized for 25 l/s per
seat: sidewall adjustable air grills mounted in the seating riser are typically limited to 9.5 l/s each
these criteria is based on:
consideration of how close the under seat diffusers are to people
trying to avoid drafts on people's legs
the limited availability of diffusers that are specifically designed for under seat
applications
The original design is based on summer condition. 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in
some area due to over design conditions. The design checks indicate based on winter condition,
we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas. The CFD model will be based on the
10 L/s per person for lower tier, mid-tier 20 L/s per person and no cooling for upper tier. A
detailed HVAC system plant spaces (Based on original and VE option design) data sheet is
attached on the appendix – A, section A – 05.
Conclusion: Based on the CFD modelling verification. The displacement air plenum and grilles
is no more required for the upper tier, for the lower (10 L/s) and mid (20 L/s) tiers displacement
plenum and air grilles will be re-reduced to suit the new CFD model results.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
9.1 Introduction
The primary input by KEO landscape architects during Stage 4 defining the impacts of the
architectural and structural modifications to the vessel on the landscape proposals. The
principle modification that impacted the landscape included the architectural levels, consequent
impacts on access to and around the ‘Vessel’, and changes to surface water proposals.
The general principles behind the VE approach to the landscape and externa works has sought
to achieve the following:
Optimum value engineering opportunities
Compliance with ‘FIFA Football Stadiums, Technical-recommendation and-
requirements; 5th-Edition’
Compliance with Supreme Committee Crowd Movement Standards, Doc Ref. Q22M-
APW-CMN-PMC-STD-0660
Optimum horizontal integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay: tying in with
proposed uses, functions and characters
Optimum vertical integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay: tying in with existing
levels, whilst ensuring a tolerance for some degree of variance of proposed levels along
the site boundary
Legacy opportunities are optimised
9.2 Methodology
KEO landscape architects have coordinated with crowd movement specialists, security
specialists, infrastructure engineers and architects to ensure that the VE options relating to their
specialisms have been reviewed against the landscape proposals, and further VE opportunities
identified and explored. For example:
Surface water drainage
Vehicular security measures
Levels and grading opportunities
Additional VE options were investigation to look at reductions in extents of paving and lighting.
Materials were also reviewed to reduce cost without compromising performance or character.
The crowd modelling undertaken for the current design is based on obstacle-free landscape
(i.e. no structures or planting) and indicates potential pinch-points at the top and bottom of the
sloped access routes that would be at the higher range of the ideal level of service, LoS D
(1person/m²).
KEO have developed architectural solutions, as part of the value engineering process, to reduce
or negate the cost of the penetrating the ground water level. This has resulted in the whole
structure to be raised, increasing the concourse level 4m from +8m QND to 12m. This has had
a significant impact on the access and circulation, requiring alternative design solutions as
detailed in Section 18 ‘VE of Crowd Modelling’. Two options were tested to find the most cost
effective compliant VE option.
Milestone 4
The option for stairs with sloped access routes takes account of the increased concourse level
of +12m and derived from an approach that prioritises the following:
Construction cost
Improved pedestrian circulation and peak flows (refer to Section 18.3.5, ‘Option 1
analysis’)
Integration with the Tournament Precinct Overlay
Tolerance within the design for future changes in proposed grade levels and concourse
levels, i.e. vertical integration with Tournament Precinct Overlay
Optimising Legacy opportunities
The recommended is the preferred option because of the reduced construction cost compared
to numerous sloped access routes, and because of the improved pedestrian circulation.
Milestone 4
The reduced mass, or footprint of the stairs allows for better circulation and, therefore integration
with the overlay. Another significant benefit, as detailed in Section 18.3.4.2 and 18.3.5, is that
the steps allow for greater flexibility in terms of level variance between concourse and precinct
level: the flight may be increased or decreased as required with minimal impact on the of fill
material. The premise of this approach, therefore, is to allow for a design that is not dependent
on, or necessitate works, at, along or beyond the site boundary circulation.
Figure 9-3: Alternative location for wadi necklace indicating opportunity for accepting Legacy stage spoil
for precinct-wide development
Consideration has been given to the stairs during Base Build and Tournament phases. In this
scenario, the stairs would be dismantled, the engineered depressions or rawdat/wadi (refer to
Section 9.5) would be retained, and the void beneath the stairs would be infilled with spoil arising
from Legacy-stage precinct-wide development to create a vegetated sloped park around the
former stadium, with winding and ascending network of pathways that connect the grade level
to the upper plaza.
Milestone 4
This option is an extension of the current design, but is adjusted to account of the increased
height of the concourse level. As detailed in Section 19.3.6, this option requires additiondesign
input to improve at-grade circulation and minimise mean density on the concourse/ plaza.
One of main disadvantages of this option is that it is dependent on raising the levels at certain
points along the north east and southern boundaries: with a fixed level of +12m, and slope
gradient of 1:21 (with landings), the sloped routes become excessively and prohibitively long if
the rise exceed more than 4m approx.
Milestone 4
Level or sloped access is not possible in original design because the level difference between
the existing levels and the current design level at this point is 2.15m approx. It is assumed that
the current design is dependent on significant grading works beyond project boundary.
Milestone 4
The recommended vertical access solution mitigates the requirement for the grading on or
beyond the site boundary. The alternative solution, comprising sloped access only, is dependent
on significant infill and grading to raise the existing levels. However, this is based on maximum
gradient of 1:50.
It may be feasible to review the design at a later date to increase the gradient of endfalls to a
maximum of 1:21 (with landings) in order to reduce the required infill volumes. However, it
should be noted that such opportunities will be limited to areas where there is no cross-flow of
pedestrian traffic: 1:21 applies to endfalls only, whereas applies to 1:50 crossfalls.
Coordination with Infrastructure engineers has raised the opportunity of omitting sub-surface
attenuation tanks for stadium surface water run-off. As the precedent image below indicates,
the appreciation of the advantages of engineered depressions for flood water attenuation is
well-established. These formalised wadi, or rawdat, appear like sunken gardens during dry
periods, but becomes sacrificial attenuation or infiltrations basins during rain events.
Milestone 4
Initial calulations indicate that the open space around the stadium can easily accommodate the
SW volumes.
9.6 Hardscape
The masterplan, and report generally, does not convey the development of the open space
hierarchy, from primary peak-flow pedestrian routes to quiet/ornamental spaces. i.e. zoning
analysis of the open space, the purpose of each space, how it functions, should be included to
convey the efficiency of the design in terms of wayfinding, pedestrian movement. There appear
to be references on the landscape masterplan to secondary pedestrian routes to, from and
between the garden areas. These paving areas could be reduced to reduce cost and improve
site legibility.
'Gardens', or planting areas, are meant to be located away from the main routes. This may need
to be reviewed in coordination with the crowd modelling analysis to ensure pedestrian flows are
not obstructed but are still shaded.
Landscape Components
9.6.1 Lighting
No evidence of lighting analysis being carried out to ascertain the visual effect of low-level
bollards and uplighters. It may be that the above will be lost in the light spillage from the stadium
and therefore ineffectual / redundant.
Milestone 4
Original design shows site-wide resin-bound gravel on a rigid paving system with some small
coverage of crystal white granite, again over a rigid sub-base. Although the sub-base is not
specified, a rigid sub-base of 150mm depth reinforced concrete is a typical approach to a high-
end finish. The extent of coverage, material and sub-base specs has been reviewed and the
following recommendations are provided:
Omit resin-bound surface
Omit granite pavers
Retain concrete sub-base and propose to this as surface course exposed aggregate:
exposed aggregates, e.g. seashells, locally sourced snail shells to convey the local
traditions relating to snail dye manufacture
Figure 9-10: Seashell exposed aggregate concrete expressing the tradition for small snail shells as
Milestone 4
Figure 9-11: Natural formation of sea snail shells found in Purple Island, Qatar, could be used as precedent
for a hand-cast or sown top-dressing for an in-situ concrete surface.
Sprinkler and sub- surface systems are specified. Sprinkler irrigation system is a FIFA
requirement. Subsurface irrigation in not a mandatory FIFA requirement but an SC requirement.
Specifying an artificial turf will eliminate the need to have dual system for irrigation. Actually,
there would not be a need for irrigation systems. Quick coupling valves for cooling and cleaning
purposes will be required. 24.820 m3 of irrigation water will be saved yearly. Construction cost
will be relatively higher.
The softscape strategy has provided an efficient design in terms of irrigation loading,
procurement and aesthetic quality. However, it is recommended that further review of
hydrozoning is undertaken; of native species and how they are grouped to attain optimum
efficiency regarding irrigation.
Cost reduction measures in this case must be largely associated with considerations to an
overall reduction in quantity, fabrication methods and materials. These cost saving measures
come at risk of decreased opportunities for users to reinforce their site orientation and decisions
points, item lifespan reduction and durability.
Milestone 4
10.1 Introduction
This section of the report presents the outcome of the Value Engineering (VE) Exercise of the
Infrastructures sections following the activities in order noted below:
Design Analysis of the Schematic Design Proposal
Identifying VE opportunities
Considering them during VE workshops and coordination with other design disciplines
Undertaking their validation.
Besides reporting the VE Exercise, this report also touches upon review Traffic Impact Study
(TIS) and further work required during D&B. A section on Environmental and Waste
Management compliances during D&B is also provided.
Legacy Mode implications have been discussed at the end. It is to be noted that the Legacy
Mode requirements were kept in mind in defining potential VE opportunity and validating them.
A confusion arose at the onset of the VE exercise in understanding the scope of works coverage
for Infrastructures in the Precinct (outside the project site), which is discussed below. The
discussed are intended to present extracts from the RFS with intention to ensure that scope is
covered as desired by Supreme Committee (SC) through its Tender Documents.
In Tender Document D2.1, Annexure 5, Scope Demarcation is provided in Drawing Ref.
– C01-FOS-D-STA-T-MP-AL-AZ-4003. An extract from the drawing is shown below:
Please note the “Stadium area” clearly defined as “The Site”, which implies the construction site
to be limited largely within the stadium construction area. This implies that the construction of
Precinct layout is to be under a separate contract package.
The project site is identified in Document D2.1, Section 4.1, in a diagram which is
extracted below. The blue boundary is mentioned as project site.
Milestone 4
Section 2 of Document D2.1, mentions that the Precinct Overlay functionality (outside
the stadium) is the planning of the precinct to accommodate the event overlay only,
which will be temporary arrangement. It also mentions that the Overlay construction will
begin in December 2019 at which time, the contractor will have limited availability of the
Precinct. This implies that the works in Precinct will be by others.
Considering the above notes from the RFS, the VE exercise considers, works in the precinct
development for event overlay to be beyond the scope for the D&B. However, note should be
taken of Section 1.6 of Technical Brief Document D2.5. The extract is provided below. It clarifies
that the scope for D&B contractor does stand for utilities connections outside the Project
Boundary:
Milestone 4
VE for all infrastructure elements inside the Project Boundary (Stadium area)
VE for utilities connections only outside the project boundary (Precinct area)
Following documents have been mainly consulted for information to carry out the VE exercise:
Section 4.19 of Schematic Design Report (Document D2.2). This serves the key source
of information for Civil Engineering Design.
The following available drawing sets:
Infrastructures design elements will start 1.5m away from stadium building line i.e. the
connection points, demands and discharge volumes will be provided by MEP designers for the
stadium and the infrastructure design elements will tie-in at those connection points. The MEP
inputs will have considered the relevant FIFA code compliance inside the stadium. As far as VE
for Infrastructure design is concerned, compliance with QCS 2014 has been considered, as
appropriate.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Extracts from Drawing ref C01-FOS-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- 3005 for the road connections:
Milestone 4
Road works inside the Project boundary is considered; the Precinct is considered beyond the
D&B scope. TIS report provided as part of Tender package (Document D4.12) has been studied
by Traffic Planners and agree with the findings and consider the layout provided to be well
designed.
The utilities connections through the Precinct area have to account for Legacy Mode. However,
the masterplan is not available to account for the utilities routing. Most utilities connect to D3
Road utilities. Some, particularly Storm water and Foul Sewer are proposed in Schematic
Design to outfall in A3 Road tie-in. Electric power cables have to connect to the Primary
substation. In absence of frozen masterplan, these utilities connections will be done considering
the available road layout plans, assuming that the utilities corridors along the Road right of ways
may be utilised. Detailed discussion on impact on Legacy Mode is provided later in Section
10.7.
The necessary authorities’ approvals are to be obtained by the contractor. An extract from
Scope of Works document (D2.1), Section 5 is provided below:
Technical Addendum No. 2, Appendix E mentions that all connection fees to the utilities are
obligation of Supreme Council. Tender Bulletin No. 18 further affirms this.
Schematic Design Report, Section 4.19.2.2 notes that the existing ground levels vary from +9.0
QND in southwest to +3.0 QND in Northeast. The contour lines in the topographic survey
drawing (Document D4.1) indicates the ground level to rise from +5.0 QND to +7.2 across D3
Road. It is also to be noted that the sea side is on the east of the plot.
Milestone 4
Appendix A-8 includes a copy of Topographic survey for the entire Precinct.
Schematic Design Report, Section 4.19.2.8 notes that the present groundwater level is -6.0m
to -7.0m QND, potentially caused by dewatering from other nearby projects. It is expected to
rise to +5m QND in long term after urbanisation and irrigation recharging of the ground water.
The Design groundwater level has been proposed to +5.0m QND. It is to be noted, however,
Ashghal interim advice note mentions that ground water level is to be considered at ground
level. Extract Below from Document D2.4 shows the ground water levels found. Appendix A-8
includes a copy
Milestone 4
In process of identifying Value Engineering Opportunities, all the available drawings were
studied carefully. The key drawings are included in Appendix A-8.
Upon considering the combined utilities drawing, it appears that reservations corridors for
individual utilities and how they can be run in a combined corridor so as to optimise the trench
work and space usage, may not have been properly considered. The diagram below shows a
concept of utilities reservation corridor.
The sketch below shows a revised utilities corridor. The revision is aimed at reducing the trench
work and reflecting the VE exercise undertaken. Two tables in the following page are provided
which show the difference in excavation amounts. It appears there is likely to be around 24%
saving in excavation works. It is to be noted that based on the VE exercise outcome, the
Stormwater Attenuation tank and pipe connection to A3 road has been omitted. This is
discussed later. The table providing excavation volume for VE proposed, also differentiates for
the volume inside the project boundary and that for the outside in Precinct.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Table below lists the potential VE items utility-wise. The drawings mentioned can be referenced
in Appendix A-8. Only the items shaded were found to have VE opportunities.
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- N/A
Road Layout in Precinct Beyond scope
3005
Telecom connections into C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Includes duct works for telecom No VE Item to note
stadium 1504
Telecom
Telecom connections for C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ- Beyond scope N/A
Precinct 1504
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- Proposed for Precinct layout - Beyond No VE Item to note
Fire Hydrant fire Hydrant connections
1509 scope
Potential to reduce amount of
C01-F0S-D-STA-T-CI-AL-AZ- Includes for excavation works for trench works necessary if the
Utilities corridors Combined utilities
1510 utilities utilities corridors could be
combined and refined.
Milestone 4
Only major VE could be found for Stromwater. Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1505 shows the proposed Storm Water
Design and the markings in red identifying the items removed under the VE exercise:
It is to be noted that this VE is based on provision of “Wadi necklace” proposed by the Landscape design which will contain the storm water.
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 71
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Other utilities, as mentioned were not found to have potential VE opportunity. Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1506
shows the proposed Foul Sewer Design. Items circled in red are for the purpose of serving the precinct and have not been accounted in costing:
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 72
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Extract below from Drawing No. C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1501 shows the proposed Potable Water Design. Items circled in red are for the
purpose of serving the precinct and have not been accounted in the costing:
Similarly other utilities drawings included in Appendix A8 may be referenced, which were used to define the quantities. Note is to be made that only
utilities supplying the stadium and the roadworks inside project site have been considered. Elements serving the Precinct usage have not been.
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 73
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Table below summarises the list of infrastructure elements, their quantities as per the tender Schematic Design and with quantities for the VE items:
QUANTITIES
SCHEMATIC DESIGN PROPOSED VE PROPOSED
UTILITIES CONNECTION DETAILSREFERENCE DRAWING VE ITEMS BRIEF DESCRIPTION REMARKS
Inside Project site Outside project site (Precinct area) Inside Project site Outside project site
MV Connections No VE Item to 4 MV from Source A and 4 MV All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA All MV cables: 3 core 300mm SWA
note from Source B
Source A: Source A:
2 nos MV = 630m 4 nos MV = 765m
1 no. MV = 490m 4 spare ducts = 765m
(+100% spare ducts for all above)
Source B:
Source B: 4 nos. MV = 940m
Although power demand will be reduced, the MV
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 3 nos. MV = 210m 4 spare ducts = 940m
No change No change connections are not to be reduced compared to the SD.
AZ-1500 2 nos. MV = 240m
1 no. MV = 605m Surplus 150mm HDPE ducts:
(+100% spare ducts for all above) 4 ducts = 1705m
Electrical
Power Surplus 150mm HDPE ducts:
3 ducts = 210m
2 ducts = 870m
1 duct = 605m
No VE Item to
Precinct Sub- C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- 2 nos substations - Beyond Scope limited to utilities connection to the stadium. The
note N/A N/A N/A N/A
stations AZ-1500 scope sub-stations are proposed for Precinct Layout needs.
No VE Item to
note
(Tender
Addendum 2, With reduced Chilled water
Coonection from Appx E demand, the connection The load is reduced to 60.0 MW cooling capacity x 2 Nos
District District Cooling C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL- mentions the could be tied to the available N/A - connection cost not unto N/A - connection cost not unto ETS plant from MEP VE exercise. 1200mm dia, 715 m pipe
N/A N/A
cooling Plant to the AZ-1503 pipe supply in D3 Road for the contrator contrator length could be reduced to 750mm pipe dia 250m long by
stadium connection connection to the north of connecting to local supply connection.
upto ETS to be the stadium
under
"Others"
scope)
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 74
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Broadband: Broadband:
C01-F0S-D-CAI-T-CI-AL-
Telecom Telecom connections 150mm dia 12 nos. - 143m each 150mm dia 12 nos. - 66m each No change No change Precinct telecom works beyond scope
AZ-1504
600mm wide trays - 60m
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 75
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Based on the VE exercise, the following items could be removed from the tender Schematic
Design proposal:
100m x 12m x 2m Attenuation tank for storm water
Storm water pump station including three pumps of 230l/s capacity
650m of stormwater pipe of 1100mm dia pipe
Unifying the utilities reservation corridor has also potential for saving in excavation required for
utilities trench work, by approximately 30%.
Milestone 4
The VE considerations from a purely sustainability perspective (while still achieving a GSAS 4
Star rating) are:
Materials Certification 1 - No ISO14001/BS8902 certification requirement for material
suppliers
Materials Certification 2 - No LCA/EPD Certificates required from material suppliers
Reduced Specifications of Water & Refrigerant Leak Detection Systems
Minimum Energy metering and still providing water Sub-metering
Remove 6,500m2 PV panels from the roof
Remove bicycle, bicycle lanes and anything else that it is related to bicycles.
The current scheme GSAS scorecard, with a comparison to the original Arup scorecard is
shown below.
The major changes resulting from the above strategies are highlighted in red.
Milestone 4
12.1 Topic
Text…..
12.1.1 Subtopic
Text…..
12.2 Topic
Text…..
12.2.1 Subtopic
Text…..
12.2.1.1 Subtopic
Text….
Bullet
o Sub-bullet
Milestone 4
13.1.1 Background
The VE concept includes an enlarged oculus opening which will potentially reduce internal
shading and therefore allow a greater amount of light to reach a greater proportion of the pitch
surface. In turn this increase in light levels may present the opportunity to alter the pitch
management strategy to a more conventional transitional method which could provide the
opportunity to remove the requirement for the pitch shading structure/s and therefore reduce
costs by approximately seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
At present the 100% SD turfgrass management strategy is based around the concept of
maintaining cool season turfgrass all year round due to low light levels caused by shade from
the 100% SD roof design.
The conventional way to manage high quality turf on a Middle East pitch is to have a dual warm
season/cool season turf strategy whereby warm season turf dominates between the months of
May to October (approx.) and cool season turf dominates from about November to April
(approx.). This strategy requires the pitch to be oversown with cool season turf seed in late
October/early November and involves a closure period of approx. 4-6 weeks to allow the cool
season turf to establish. In order to facilitate a cool season all year round approach the SD
concept incudes a pitch shading structure to mitigate high summer temperatures.
Milestone 4
The focus of our VE investigation has been to analyse the revised roof to assess whether a
conventional transitional turfgrass strategy would be possible given the redesigned oculus
opening. The VE oculus opening is only marginally larger than the SD opening across but
significantly the whole roof has been lowered which is particularly relevant. Figure 2 below
illustrates the impact of lowering the stadium roof in combination with the sun’s angle.
Previously the 100% Scheme Design for the roof had the level of the pitch at 42 m below the
base of the roof and 58 m below the top of the roof. The current VE configuration has the level
of the pitch some 35 m below the base of the roof and 55 m below the top of the roof.
Milestone 4
Hemiview analysis is carried out on a roof design to estimate the amount of photosynthetically
active radiation (PAR) reaching the pitch. The amount of PAR received at pitch level is a
combination of the latitude and elevation of the site combined with the orientation of the stadium,
the shape and height of the roof as well as the materials used for roof construction.
The following diagram illustrates each of the 35 images rendered from a 3D model of the
stadium roof oculus looking upwards from the pitch surface. These images are processed
resulting in average monthly light intervals for each position displayed as contour maps. The
gradient maps illustrated in Figures 4-7 show a comparison between pitch light levels predicted
from the SD roof opening and the VE roof.
Guidelines given are 35 mol/m²/day of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for active
growth of warm season turf vs. 12 mol/m²/day for cool season turf.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Figure 4. January to March; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.
Milestone 4
Figure 5. April to June; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.
Milestone 4
Figure 6. July to September; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.
Milestone 4
Figure 7. October to December; VE roof to the left, 100% SD roof to the right.
Milestone 4
Supplementary lighting deployment schedules for both the 100% SD and VE roof are included
below for comparison. There are significant improvements in terms of both light levels and
uniformity especially across the northern end of the pitch. It should also be noted that in some
months, notably the transition phase where light levels are marginal so that provision of
sufficient light for plant health is not achievable with 'normal levels' of supplementary lighting
rigs (see pink sections in Fig. 9 below).
The maximum deployment for ‘normal level’ supplementary lighting is 20-22 days per month
maximum set to allow for pitch logistics, match play and maintenance requirements.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
13.1.4 Discussion
It is evident from the gradient maps that the VE roof design allows a greater overall amount of
light reach the pitch surface. Not only that but the light reaching the surface is more uniform
and better distributed throughout most of the year.
When evaluating whether a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy would be
appropriate for the VE version of the Lusail Stadium pitch, it is necessary to set some ‘target’
(PAR) light levels to reflect the different types of grass that would be present during different
times of the year and to reflect natural light levels available. These target light levels are shown
in Table 2 below.
TABLE 2 - Proposed target light values for a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy
at Lusail
Milestone 4
* Note that a lower limit of 15 mol/day is set for the pitch during the months of January and
February but which still allows better survival of underlying semi-dormant warm season turf (for
a pure monostand of cool season grass, a value of 12 mol/day is used).
By interrogating the deployment schedule along with an assessment of local climatic conditions
we can better understand which type of turf management strategy is best suited to any situation.
The recommended strategy for 100% SD involved using cool season grass species all year
round primarily because of the shade problems caused by the roof structure. The concept
involved the use of supplementary technologies such as sub surface aeration and pitch specific
shade covers used in combination to mitigate the effects of the summer climate and enable
suitable conditions for cool season grasses survival.
As previously discussed the conventional method of managing high quality turf in the Middle
East pitch is to have a transitional warm season/cool season turf strategy whereby warm season
turf dominates between the months of May to October (approx.) and cool season turf dominates
from about November to April (approx.). In order to employ this strategy, the stadium
architecture must enable sufficient light levels at the pitch surface to sustain each type of
turfgrass.
The Hemiview results indicate that the VE roof will provide sufficient light levels for a transitional
strategy, though there are some months, notably the transition phase, where light levels are
marginal and are above the threshold for normal deployment of supplementary lighting rigs.
It should also be highlighted that the proposed target light values used as the basis for
determining the turfgrass strategy are currently being examined by specific research in Doha
aimed at improving our understanding of optimal light levels for transitional turfgrass
management in the region.
13.2.1 Background
The pitch specific ventilation and air circulation system had been included within the 100% SD
scheme. This type of system can help to mitigate high humidity levels and the lack of natural
ventilation within the stadium bowl as well as providing a mechanism to mitigate peak water
levels and subsequent flooding after storm events.
The pitch ventilation/air circulation system is used to replenish oxygen in the rootzone, reduce
carbon dioxide, remove excess moisture and modify rootzone temperature, all of which will help
turf survive mid-day heat stress, high humidity levels and the lack of natural ventilation in the
stadium bowl.
Milestone 4
Given the overall stadium architecture remains essentially unchanged from the original 100%
SD concept, we would not anticipate a significant variation in the pitch microclimate and
therefore we would advocate retaining the pitch ventilation/air circulation system as a core
elements of the pitch management strategy. It should also be noted that the inclusion of a pitch
ventilation/air circulation within World Cup stadia is a FIFA preference mainly to reduce the risk
of match cancellation in the event of a significant storm event.
13.3.1 Background
A carpet type reinforcing product was specified for the stadium pitch at 100% SD. This approach
proposed the use of intact fabrics or artificial turf carpet placed into or below the surface, filled
with rootzone material and in which natural turfgrass is grown (Fig. 11 below).
The selection of a carpet type reinforcing product is based mainly on the increased wear
tolerance and surface stability such products offer turfgrass. This type of carpet type reinforcing
product would also allow for the rapid replacement or re-turf of the pitch with limited risk whilst
providing the benefits of a full natural turf pitch.
Milestone 4
In terms of flexibility, installing a reinforcement product which permits a relatively quick pitch
replacement in the event of pitch failure reduces risk, especially around the World Cup
tournament itself.
The change from a cool season management strategy to a more conventional transitional
management strategy will not affect the primary rationale behind the inclusion of a carpet type
pitch reinforcement system, namely increased wear tolerance and surface stability. We would
therefore recommend that this element of the 100% SD concept is retained.
Milestone 4
14.1 Overview
The original design documentation refers to ‘security’ in a number of instances throughout the
documentation produced by Arups however this review is primarily based upon the Security
Report and accompanying drawings which are listed below. Furthermore the work has been
completed with due consideration of the work producedby other members of the design team,
such as Structures, Façade Design and Landscape Archetects:
Reference Title
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-REP-SE00025 RevT0 Security Report
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-SE-XX-XX-1000 Stadium EACS + IDS + Intercoms deployment
(drawings for Levels B4, B3, B2, B1, 01, 02, 03,
04, P5)
C01-FOS-D-STA-T-SE-AL-AZ-XXXX Stadium security schematic drawings
However, there are a number of documents which we would expect to receive at this level of
design which were not provided. Examples include:
CCTV layout drawings for the stadium
CCTV schedules for the hardware within the stadium
CCTV layout drawings for the precinct
CCTV schedules for the hardware within the precinct
Intruder detection system schedules for the stadium and precinct
Access control system schedules for the stadium and precinct
Vehicle dynamics assessment
Hostile vehicle mitigation drawings and schedules for the stadium and precinct
Lighting and CCTV coordination report
Structural analysis of the structure and façade when subjected to blast
The review which we have undertaken is primarily based upon the mandatory guidance
documents which have been produced by the Supreme Committee, a list of the most relevant
documents is provided below (not withstanding standards and codes of practice which also play
a role in the decision process):
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRF-0620 Qatar 2022 Security Risk Profile (Summary)
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0393 2022 FIFA World Cup Qatar Security Strategy
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0882 CPTED & Ancillary Security
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0883 Security Barriers
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0884 Access Control
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0885 Hostile Vehicle Mitigation
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0886 Search & Screening
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0887 Security Resilience Part B
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0889 Intruder Detection
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0890 Video Surveillance
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-DGS-0891 Security Lighting
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0790 Security Design Guide
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0875 Security Resilience Strategy: Part B
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-0930 Stadium/Precinct Integrated Control Rooms
Strategy
Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRC-1249 Void Identification / Certification
Milestone 4
The proceeding sections consider the Arup submission in more detail and provide commentary
on whether the work is considered compliant with the guidance documents and best practice.
The main body of the report presents the basis of design utilised throughout and is backed up
with appendices which provide more detailed information on the design submission. However,
in our opinion the schematic design report lacks the level of detail we would come to expect for
a project of this type and a number of critical items have been overlooked at this stage of the
design process.
A key part of a submission of this type is a critical assets register which sets out all of the assets
which will require commensurate levels of protection depending on the critically of the asset to
Qatar 2022. The security requirements for the assets will change during the three phases of
the project (Base, Overlay, and Legacy) and each asset should be considered separately for
each stage. Furthermore, the critical assets within the Precinct, (which help to maintain the
functionality within the stadium) have also not been provided, we believe this is a critical
oversight.
The threat and vulnerability assessment is presented in Appendix B and correctly considers all
principal threat types such as terrorism, crime and cyber. It also considers the three stages,
Base, Tournament and Legacy however crucially the threat assessment does not consider
critical assets individually, instead it would appear that the residual risk is equally shared across
all assets, this approach can lead to an uneconomical design.
Furthermore, the threat and vulnerability (T & V) assessment does not provide mitigation
measures within the assessment table, instead the mitigation measures (including items such
as electronic and physical security) are presented on a separate table but is not integrated within
the T&V assessment.
However, the mitigation measures are clearly laid out for various areas of the development and
the presentation does make it easy to check. A review of the mitigation measures, at Base, is
provided below:
The threats considered within the report are generally considered to be applicable however
there are a couple of areas which we believe require reconsideration. The ballistic threat is
specified as being 0.44” Magnum (BR/FB4) which is no longer a common ballistic round type
and we do not believe it is particularly applicable to Qatar 2022.
The blast threat does not appear to have been considered in any detail, instead a high level,
qualitative assessment has been carried out which considers the possible effects and response
of the structure as opposed to conducting analyses. It is also unclear whether the charge sizes
(TNT NEQ) have been provided to the design team for consideration. The work is based upon
the assumption that the HVM perimeter (specified within the SC guidance notes) is being
provided but there is little evidence to suggest that the standoff is actually achievable. We would
Milestone 4
expect plans of the precinct to include the HVM boundary as a way of checking that the standoff
has been achieved, otherwise the load on the facades and structural frame could be
considerably greater than anticipated (which could lead to hardening of the structure).
The CCTV provision (i.e. 10%R Detect, 25%R Observe, 50%R Recognise, 120%R Identify) is
in accordance with normal guidance. Emiri Decree No.9 utilises the Rotakin system which is
based upon PAL 576i CCTV cameras, however the cameras are expected to be Megapixel
which operate at a higher resolution. A study has been carried out in the original design which
usefully compares PAL576i with megapixel categories based upon minimum pixels per metre.
However, it is worth noting that Observe is not specified within Emiri Decree No.9, yet ‘Monitor’
at 5%R is.
The coverage levels are in accordance with Decree No.9 however we would recommend
revisiting the following areas:
120% R is specified for the ‘Stadium Seating Bowl’. We would recommend 50% R
Recognise
120% R is specified for the ‘Field of Play’. We would recommend 25% R Recognise
120% R is specified for ‘Emergency Escape Lobbies’. We would recommend 50% R
Recognise
It is unclear whether this only applies to the entrances as CCTV drawings have not been
specified. Generally we would recommend 50%R to the entrances and 10% to 25% coverage
of the area in question. In addition some areas, such as enclosed plant rooms may not require
any coverage, and it may not be practical to do so (due to fixed equipment obstructing the view
and restricting sight lines).
The above revisions to the CCTV strategy will result in considerable savings, in terms of both
CCTV hardware but also with respect to data storage.
The report recommends the provision of 120days on site storage (of CCTV footage) but no
indication as to what the overall storage requirements. In our experience the storage
requirements for 120days of footage, for a building of this type, will be extremely large
(especially when considering that the data should be backed up). Whilst it is important to
maintain 120 days storage (as specified within Decree No.9) we would recommend, in this
instance, only allowing for 31days of onsite storage and 90 days of offsite storage (perhaps in
the National Command Centre). A review of the storage requirements is provided below:
In order to be compliant with the MOI requirements the following needs to be provided within
the design:
120 Day storage of all CCTV Cameras
Continuous recording at 25fps
Megapixel video footage
Milestone 4
Therefore, when comparing Megapixel to 4CIF there is an increase in data of 3.9, on this basis:
1 camera in HD transmits 2.5 x 3.9 = 9.75Mbps
1Mbps = 10Gb per day for 120 days equates to 11.7Tb per camera
Using an online bandwidth / storage calculator with the same data the estimate is 46.7Tb per
camera.
In calculating the possible number of cameras likely to be required around the site the following
assumptions have been made:
Areas which have an observation criteria of ‘Monitor’ will have cameras located at no
greater distance than 100m
Areas which have an observation criteria of ‘Detect’ will have cameras located at no
greater distance than 50m.
A 10% margin will be allowed to Base stage
A 20% margin will be allowed to Overlay stage
A CCTV schedule has not been provided by Arups however we estimate that there will be
approximately 640 cameras at base in order to meet the SC’s and Emiri Decree no.9 coverage
requirement, plus an additional +1000 cameras to deal with precinct security and additional
coverage of the stadium during overlay. On this basis we estimate the following data storage
requirements:
On this basis the total data storage required to meet the MOI is:
Base: 7,488 Tb Minimum 29,888 Tb Maximum
Overlay: 19,013 Tb Minimum 75,888 Tb Maximum
However based upon our proposal that the data is stored for 31 days only and at 8fps record
rate.
Therefore if the DC proposal is accepted the maximum data storage required would be:
Base: 2,491 Tb Maximum
Overlay: 6,324 Tb Maximum
Please note all these figures are based on a number of assumptions, and do not necessarily
represent the final requirements which would be established at detailed design stage, where
camera positions would need to be fully coordinated with Landscaping, M&E Services etc
however the above relates to a considerable cost saving with respect to data storage. Please
note that we believe there is a requirement for N+1 storage which mean data storage may
actually be twice the figure indicated above.
However, our detailed review of the CCTV provision could not be completed as the CCTV
drawings and schedules were not issued. Furthermore the CCTV provision across the Precinct
has also not been discussed/provided. The layout and coverage of the cameras in the Precinct
is important to the functionality of the stadium and should be considered in more detail. Although
this function will fall into the Overlay phase an allowance needs to be made at Base build.
Milestone 4
We would also expect receipt of a Lighting & CCTV coordination study which will consider the
Lux levels through the precinct and stadium. We could not find this study and recommend
considering this in more detail during the next design phase.
Both electronic and mechanical access control systems are proposed throughout the stadium.
It is apparent (although this cannot be confirmed as we do not have door schedules) that
electronic access control will be used extensively across the stadium whereas we believe that
there is an opportunity to restrict the use of access control to key areas. For example it is feasible
to provide electronic access control to gain entry to back of house zones (i.e. the doorway from
unrestricted to restricted foyers) but we would recommend providing keyed entry to doors to
individual back of house rooms (e.g. plant rooms). The areas would still be covered by intruder
detection linked to the alarm systems (the zoning would be operated from the Security Control
Room, SCR) and a key management system would be operated from the SCR.
The above proposals also apply to the Hospitality boxes which have been provided with
electronic access control (EAC), however we do not believe this is practical in areas which are
semi-public and do not particularly benefit from EAC systems. In this area we would recommend
providing key suited system with access to keys strictly controlled from the SCR.
We estimate that approximately 50% of the EACS doors could be replaced with keyed entry
which offers a considerable cost saving to both the electronic access control hardware but also
the data management relating to access control. The introduction of a key suited system will
result in some financial expenditure however it is strongly believed that a considerable cost
saving can still be achieved.
The physical security is based upon a layered approach which provides a sensible basis of
design, however the protection against climbing (as a means of gaining entry) has not been
considered and will only form part of the design at Detailed Design phase. The security ratings
within the report refer to the LPS 1175 standard (SR1 to SR8) which is widely recognised
standard in the United Kingdom and referenced within the Qatar 2022 documentation.
The majority of the door sets within the documentation are specified as SR2/SR3. Whilst this
level of protection may be applicable we believe there is an opportunity to lower some of the
SR3 doors to SR2. However, as door schedules were not provided we were unable to carry out
detailed checks to determine the number of doors that this may affect.
Furthermore, the report specifies the use of Maglocks in many restricted areas across the
development. Maglocks are inherently weak and not recommended for use in secure
environments. We would recommend restricting their use to only ‘public to public’ areas. Instead
we would recommend providing electro-mechanical locks to restricted areas in order to achieve
a level of protection commensurate to the doors. Also there was no evidence that the doors that
are proposed, whilst taking into consideration the access control requirements, are available in
Qatar.
The security levels to the walling are in keeping with the security provision to the doors,
however, the form of construction is not discussed in detail. We envisage the use of blockwork
construction in most areas, which can be upgraded to suit the specified level of physical security.
For example, walling requiring a base level of security, eg SR2 could be provided with 7N/mm2
blocks, half stretcher thick (215mm), however a medium level of protection could be achieved
using a dense concrete block (22.5N/mm2) 215mm thick, which can be further enhanced with
Milestone 4
the provision of expanded metal lathing fixed to the back face (or both faces, depending on
where the attack is coming from). Alternatively reinforced concrete walls could also be
considered, a 150mm RC wall will achieve 17 minutes resistance to a sledgehammer or over
10mins using a petrol disc cutter. Alternative forms of construction are also available if required,
such as stud partition walls which incorporate metal lathing and timber sublayers.,
The level of security offered to the roof gantry was not considered by the Designers and careful
consideration should be offered to how access will controlled in the future. The roof offers
significant vantage points in the event of an attack and enables terrorist to target critical
structural members as indicated below.
A search and screening capability is proposed at Base design. The need for this does not
appear to correlate with the threat and risk assessment which advises that the threat of a person
borne device, or concealed weapon is Low.
An extensive search and screening plaza will be provided in the Precinct during Tournament
mode and we do not believe that an additional facility is required within the stadium. Although
cable ways and power could be provided should the risks change.
However, we do recommend the provision of connectivity from the stadium perimeter (at
entrance points) to the SCR, in the form of a hardwired cabled link to the SCR, in the event that
the security threat level changes in the future. This can then be used if Mag and Bag screening
is required.
We anticipate that there is a list detailing the requirements of all security stakeholders with
respect to physical security, electronic security and architecture. It is unclear whether this has
been considered in detail by the design team however we recommend conducting a thorough
review of their requirements during the next phase of works.
The resilience of the stadium to resist the effects of blast is primarily based upon the standoff
which can be achieved from a vehicle borne device. Furthermore it is important to ensure that
a vehicle borne device cannot gain entry down into the basement of the stadium. We would
expect drawings to be prepared showing how hostile vehicle mitigation measures will be
provided around the stadium and surrounding area, however there is little evidence within the
documentation describing how this will be achieved.
It is proposed that during base build a line of Hesco Bastion gabions, filled with spoil from the
site, will be provided around the facility, however we believe that during base build a more
permanent, and architecturally appealing solution could be developed using the natural
landscape and street furniture. Consideration will also be given to reviewing the vehicle
approach routes to see if the approach speed can be controlled such that the impact energy will
be lower and a more economical solution can be sought.
Furthermore a detailed design will be required to ensure that the access to the basement is
restricted. We recommend the use of IWA14 / PAS68 tested rising barriers to the basement
entrance. In order to reduce capital expenditure we would recommend the use of the Cedar
barrier which is a manually operated barrier which is cost effective yet robust.
Milestone 4
It is clear that a lot of work needs to be carried out to complete the HVM design and this will
form an important part of the next phase of works.
The security designers for Lusail had not analysed the effects of blast onto the stadium structure
or façade, instead they had provided some commentary on the anticipated response and
discussed possible failure modes.
However, our review is based the programme wide standoff document reference Q22M-APw-
CMN-MEM-PMC-QSC-14-0002 which specifies standoff requirements for the stadium with
respect to vehicle borne devices.
The technical memo was issued in order to obtain agreement between Security Stakeholders
with regards to stand off distances from vehicle borne threats. It considered two threat sizes
which we are referring to as:
Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device (VBIED)
Large Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device (LVBIED)
Standoff Requirements
It is understood that the standoff requirements specified by the stakeholders are predominantly
only applicable to the Tournament mode however we have also considered their impact on the
Base and Legacy modes.
During the tournament there are two categories for Standoff which are to be achieved where
practicable. The first deals with Match Days and the second considers Non Match Days, the
standoff criteria for them both is provided below:
Match Day
Provide a standoff of 300m between all unscreened trucks, large commercial vehicles and
Tournament Critical Assets and Crowded Spaces – Considered to be a LVBIED.
Provide 100m standoff between all unscreened vehicles and Tournament Critical Assets and
Crowded Spaces
Vehicle Descriptions
In accordance with the standoff document two vehicles types have been considered, images of
the vehicles have been provided below:
Large Commercial Vehicles include, but are not limited to, the following examples:
Milestone 4
Cars and Sports Utility Vehicles (SUV’s) include, but are not limited to the following examples:
The diagram overview shows an indicative 100m and 300m standoff from the stadium. It
requires further detail from the Landscape Architect, which will provide more detailed
information on the extent of the surrounding roads, structures and landscaping (some of which
we can incorporate into the HVM plan). More information to follow.
Vehicle Routes
The vehicles routes within and around the stadium vary depending on the phase of operation,
an overview is provided below (drawing required from Landscape architect):
Critical Assets
In accordance with the above requirements we have considered the following Critical Assets
and crowded spaces:
Milestone 4
Base Mode
Stadium
VVIP Parking
Substation
District Cooling (energy centre)
Tournament
Stadium
VVIP Parking
Substation
District Cooling
Search Screening
Walkways
Legacy Mode
Stadium
VVIP Parking
Substation
District Cooling
Blast Parameters
Whilst the design document provides information on the standoff, no information was provided
on the size of the charges so it is not possible to be certain on the design pressures which
should be considered (charge weights are likely to be classified). However, based upon best
practice we have assumed some typical charge weights for a VBIED and a LVBIED and derived
blast design parameters for use in the analysis of the facades. The results from our analyses
are provided below.
The façade is described in more detail in Section 16, however the Figure below shows a cross
section through the stadium.
Based upon the design documentation it is our intention to provide protection to building
occupants in the event of an external detonation whilst also minimising the amount of debris
which will produced from the outside façade of the structure.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete Cladding was originally proposed, an image of the
EWS503 façade has been provided below:
Blast tests have been conducted on GFRC cladding systems and the results from the test
demonstrate that the system has blast resistant capabilities however the fibre strand length and
density is an important factor in ensuring a suitably resistant product.
However, the façade engineers have proposed alternative systems as a part of the VE exercise,
a number of proposals have been considered:
Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or
Powder coating.
Replace the actual GFRC cladding with patterned aluminium painted PVDF or Powder
coating.
The external skin (GFRC) to be omitted and the pattern of adjacent façade to be
replicated with ceramic frit on the glazing.
Milestone 4
The above proposals offer suitable levels of blast resistance providing that the support
conditions are carefully designed to resist the ultimate load of the façade and so long as the
glazing is laminated (using a makeup suitable to meet the blast requirements).
However, we do not expect the façade to provide equivalent levels of attack resistance
compared to a GFRC panel. The façade design will need to consider the attack resistance to
ensure the design provides equivalent levels of physical security. For example the aluminium
mesh cladding will need robust fixings and may need to be installed in front of a block work wall
as part of the overall physical security strategy. Additionally the ceramic frit glazing will require
laminates to ensure blast and attack resistance. This may also include the use of polycarbonate
or SGP interlayers.
A glass façade mounted within a capless curtain walling system was originally proposed, an
image of the EWS102 façade has been provided below:
The façade will be used a weather seal and therefore will not be an insulated pane however we
will need to ensure that it provides a suitable level of blast resistance.
On this basis our recommendation is a laminated pane utilising pvb interlayers and according
to our assumed charge weights we recommend the following construction.
This is based upon a square pane measuring 1000mm x 1000m, although it is understood that
the panes are likely to be triangular it was considered acceptable, at this stage, to consider a
simplified/more conventional shape.
Based upon the above makeup we expect the panes to crack but with very low hazard
fragmentation (please note that this information is subject to change in the event that the charge
weights are greater than originally anticipated) and the analysis assumes the use of annealed
panes which are more cost effective than heat strengthened or toughened panes of glass.
Milestone 4
We would expect the laminated panes to be framed using a minimum of 18/20mm rebate with
the internal rebate fixed using robust mechanical fixings. The anticipated deflection of the glass
panes is relatively small (less than 25mm) so the degree of shortening is limited and we would
recommend either a wet (silicone) or dry (rubber gaskets) glazed system.
The calligraphy fascia is located at the top of the vessel and it utilises a similar system as EWS
106 but the glazed pane has been omitted. This could be designed to offer sufficient blast
resistance however the calligraphy must be robustly fixed to ensure it remains attached to the
façade.
Roof Cladding
In addition to the vertical façade we have also considered the response of the roof cladding
which is referred to as RFS-301, 302 and 601.
No VE options have been proposed but we can confirm that generally standing seam roof
systems perform well under blast loading and are reasonable for use in the instance.
The roof sheeting is specified as a PTFE fabric which we would expect to tear under blast
loading. This is advantageous as the ultimate resistance of the roof cladding will be relatively
low and will limit the maximum force into the roof structure. Furthermore we would not expect
the cladding to be life threatening if parts of it were to fall on to the spectators within the bowl.
Milestone 4
The structural and façade engineers also recommend the use of a PVC membrane system as
an alternative to the PTFE roof as it offers a reasonable cost saving but with a reduced lifespan.
We understand that the yield strength of the PVC and PTFE membranes are relatively similar
and will respond in a similar manner. Therefore we would have no objection to changing the
PTFE roof to a PVC system.
We anticipate that the roof structure will received the following approximate blast parameters:
VBIED at 100m
LVBIED at 100m
LVBIED at 300m
Based upon the above scenarios we would expect the roof cladding to resist a LVBIED at 300m
but we expect it to tear for the VBIED and LVBIED threats at 100m. The response of the roof
structure has been considered separately.
In addition to the façade analysis a qualitative review of the roof structure has been conducted.
The stand structure was originally conceived to be of cast in situ reinforced concrete, however
the VE exercise proposes the use of a steel frame above the level 01 concourse.
Whilst insitu reinforced concrete generally has a larger degree of structural redundancy, it is
reasonable to use a steel frame construction to resist blast loadings however precast concrete
floor slabs will require careful detailing to ensure suitable robustness (for example at web cleat
connections to the steelwork). The use of this form of construction is likely to lead to additional
structural voids, for example in the hollowcore floor slabs and steelwork, all of which will need
Milestone 4
to be accounted for within the Void Register (required for all sealed voids in accordance with
SC guidance document for Void Detection), see below.
On the above basis we do not believe the main structure is particularly susceptible to blast
effects, providing that standoff is maintained (and structural connections are detailed carefully),
however the roof structure will require careful consideration.
We recommend carrying out a explicit finite element model of the roof structure in order to check
its response under blast, taking into account the ultimate resistance of the PTFE/PVC roof
cladding (as this will limit the maximum pressure which the roof structure will receive). An
analysis of the roof has not yet been completed at this stage (a detailed blast analysis of this
size will require reasonable computational effort) however the roof does not offer much
structural redundancy and is prone to collapse in the event of the loss of one or two key
elements. Therefore careful consideration must be given to the access strategy to ensure that
access to the roof structure cannot be easily obtained.
Void Register
The void register will be collated using the following guidance notes:
Void Identification and Certification Strategy Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-STR-1191
Void Identification and Certification Procedure Q22M-APW-CMN-PMC-PRC-1249
The guidance notes outline the strategy and procedures to be implemented in order to help
ensure the security integrity of venue structures and helping to ensure life safety in the event
that an explosive device of weapon is concealed within a void.
The void strategy document refers primarily to inaccessible voids and excludes accessible
voids.
Detonation of a concealed device likely to cause minimal physical damage, injury, disruption
and reputational damage to Qatar and FIFA. Inspection and closure of low risk voids should be
witness by the contractor.
Amber – Moderate Risk
Retrieval of weapons and/or detonation of a concealed explosive device with the potential to
cause severe structural damage to critical infrastructure resulting in disruption or cancellation
of events, as well as inflicting significant loss of life and serious reputational damage to Qatar
and FIFA. All high risk voids must be reported to the PMC security team prior to permanent
Milestone 4
closure with the opportunity to witness given in good time. Inspection and closure of high risk
voids should be witnessed by the contractor and witnessed and countersigned by the
construction supervision consultant and security stakeholders or their representative. Security
stakeholders may supplement the inspection of critical voids through deployment of firearms /
explosives search dogs or other specialist search equipment.
Void Register
A void register will be provided once the Stadium Architect has detailed voids to an extent which
will enable a Void Register to be prepared. However a list of typical voids have been categorised
and listed below.
Partition walls in critical areas such as VVIP and VIP lounge
Structural cores
Tubular steel roof structure which is a high risk element
Risers throughout the stadium
Column shrouds
Tubular façade and roof steel
Hollowcore floor slabs
Ceiling voids
Raised floors
Ceiling Cavities
Raised floors in PTA’s, STA’s, stadium control room, fire command centre, venue
operating centre.
Lift shafts
Zones above temporary accommodation structures
Areas between the back of the blockwork walls and the underside of the terrace/plenum
at the edge of the floor plates
Air plenums under seating.
Diesel tanks
OB draw pits
Trenched services from the stadium to internal accommodation in the dunes
The ballistic threat is specified as being 0.44” Magnum (BR/FB4) which is no longer a common
ballistic round type and we do not believe it is particularly applicable to Qatar 2022.
Furthermore, we understand that the design specification refers to ballistic resistant facades
being required to the following areas:
EWS – 101
EWS – 102
EWS – 103
EWS – 104
EWS – 105
EWS – 106
Whilst it would be desirable, from a security perspective, to provide ballistic resistant glazing
across the external façade of the stadium we do not believe it is practicable. FB4 resistant
glazing is likely to be in the order of 30 to 45mm thick (for conventional glass laminates) and will
add considerable cost to both the façade and the supporting structure (previous analyses have
demonstrated that the façade will require an 11.5mm annealed laminate in order to resist the
blast loading).
Milestone 4
We would not recommend providing ballistic resistant glazing to the whole external façade of
the structure. Instead we would limit it to only critical areas such as:
Enclosed part of the VVIP area.
Emir’s route from his car to the Royal Box
VVIP Safe Haven(s).
Venue Operations Centre (VOC)
Security Control Room (SCR).
In order to achieve the FB4 requirement (threat level yet to be confirmed) can be
achieved using conventional forms of construction, for example:
Blockwork walls to be constructed from dense concrete blocks and a minimum of 100mm
thick
Studwork walls to be lined with either 5mm thick mild steel plate (1No) or two sheets of
3mm thick. The steelwork can be subsequently lined with plasterboard in order to
achieve a finishing coat.
The above forms of construction, which utilise conventional forms of construction, are cost
effective and readily available in country. We would not recommend the use of armoured steel
or other proprietary ballistic resistant systems as they are more costly and less readily available.
Milestone 4
The purpose of this report is to outline the VE options for the design of electrical systems as
described below for the Lusail Stadium project. It is also the intention of validating that the
original design is in complete compliance with relevant international standards, regulations and
recommended design practices and as/or modified by local practice and code requirements of
Qatar and to meet the FIFA and Supreme Committee requirements of constructability,
modularity and performance.
The system information is provided in the electrical engineering Report, Electrical Typical
Medium voltage switchboards schematic, Supreme Committee -Precinct + Stadium Electrical
Design Concept and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs, however, there is Insufficient
data provided for the basis of power demand load assumptions (lighting, power, CT, A/V, food
services, HVAC, FP, etc.).
In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand (MD) for the Stadium power
requirements at schematic design is approximately 21 MVA and the estimated standby
electrical maximum demand is approximately 12 MVA. The Stadium has four substations with
electrical power demand loads as follows:
Substation 1: Total MD = 5,693 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 2: Total MD = 5,256 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 3: Total MD = 5,031 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 4: Total MD = 5,112 KVA (Tournament Non- Essential + Essential)
Substation 1 and 2 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 1350 KVA each, whereas
substation 3 and 4 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 650 KVA each.
The original design for power demand load assumption is based on the summary of electrical
load split table (The essential and non-essential load), The employer’s requirements,1.1
Annexure 1 –Status of Design comment ID: C01-MEP3-025
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) reduces the total power demand load of the project to 15.5 MVA
and standby power demand load to 10.8 MVA, which includes the life safety loads, IT, ELV and
cooling load. This leads to a potential saving in the number of the transformers, generators and
related electrical spatial criteria.
Milestone 4
4 1 set
Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 836.73
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 772.50
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 739.43
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
4 1 set
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 751.34
(1600KVA) (1000KVA)
TOTAL 15500.00 20357.08 3100.00
For power demand load and stand by load details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary
breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design
and for revised space planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required
plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design.
Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% for power demand load and
10% for standby power load due to reduction in built up area and cooling load. Hence the total
number of transformers reduced by 30% and the LV generator (life safety) size updates to
1000KVA for each substation.
The system information is provided in the electrical engineering Report, Electrical Typical
Medium voltage switchboards schematic, Supreme Committee -Precinct + Stadium Electrical
Design Concept and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs. However, the 11 KV Cable sizes
and LV Cable lengths are not shown on the drawings.
In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements is approximately 21 MVA. The original design proposes the incoming MV power
distribution to the stadium. This includes connection from two networks via KAHRAMAA owned
switchgear arrangement. Each source (A or B) of 132KV have a capacity to individually support
the entire stadium load. Additionally, and for enhanced resilience, each source will also have
two supplies (A1/A2 and B1/B2) each capable of supplying 100% of the stadium.
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, discussion with KAHRAMAA for the system details will be undertaken. The
Medium voltage (MV) Scheme will have to be coordinated and agreed upon by KAHRAMAA as
per the revised power demand load for the Stadium.
Milestone 4
Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% for power demand load and
10% for standby power load due to reduction in built area and cooling load. Hence each MV
panel size will be reduced by 26%
The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1
,2,3&4, Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1,2,3&4 and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs, however, KAHRAMAA meters/ energy meters’ schematic is not shown
on the drawings.
In the original design, the energy management system (EMS) meets the requirement of GSAS
for remote reading of power meters throughout the building. The EMS will comprise network
multifunctional energy and power quality metering for power, lighting and process loads
throughout the facility. The system will be IP based and fully integrated with other systems on
the network. The Low Voltage (LV) switchboards will be equipped with integral KAHRAMAA
meters.
Conclusion – The cost for installing an energy management system (EMS) can be eliminated.
The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4.
In the original design, the estimated electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements at schematic design is approximately 21 MVA. The Stadium has four substations
located as per the following:
Transformer equipment sizes are generally based on 1600KVA, with allowance of 20% spare
capacity.
Milestone 4
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA, international code, and FIFA requirements.
There are no specific supreme committee requirements.
In the VE proposal, the number of transformers is reduced by 30% based on the updated power
demand load due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) and further reduction in the substations electrical spatial criteria.
The four substations will be relocated to the pitch level 0 and the total power demand load and
number of transformers will be updated as follows:
Total Total
Total
power Demand No of
VE area Demand power No of
Demand standby Generators
requirements Factor Connected Transformers
Load Load (Life safety)
Load (KVA)
(KVA) (KVA)
For no of transformers details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary breakdown of the electrical
load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design and for revised space
planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on
the original and VE Option design.
Conclusion – The total power demand load can be reduced by 26% due to reduction in built
area and cooling load. The total area for substation1, 2, 3&4 can be reduced by 10-15% due to
reduction in built up area and cooling load this will result in reduced 30% numbers of the
transformers.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs and Low
voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4. However, the MV generators sizes
are not shown on the drawings.
In the original design, the estimated standby electrical maximum demand for the Stadium power
requirements is approximately 12 MVA, in addition to the KAHRAMAA primary source, standby
comprising MV generator back up will be provided for the stadium site but located outside the
site boundary (in the overlay area).
Milestone 4
The summary of electrical load split table for basis of demand load assumption (The essential
and non-essential load) was designed based on The employer’s requirements ,1.1 Annexure 1
–Status of Design comment ID: C01-MEP3-025
In the original design, the standby power capacity will support event critical and life safety
systems during failure of the incoming arrangement. The temporary 11 KV generators provided
within the precinct overlay will provide supply failure backup to all the event essential and life
safety supplies. These generators will not run in parallel to the utility supply and will be stepped
down through dedicated transformers separately and connected into the system on the LV
boards’ side. Additionally, permanent LV diesel powered generators adjacent to the four
substations, will provide 3 hours of backup to all life safety loads should both the mains and MV
generators fail.
In the original design, The MV generators are sized for N+1 and interlinked with the adjacent
substations. Substation 1&2 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 1350 KVA each,
whereas substation 3 and 4 will have one LV generator (life safety) sized for 650 KVA each.
The original design complies with the KAHRAMAA, Qatar civil defence, international codes, and
FIFA requirements. There are no specific supreme committee requirements.
The original design for Life safety meets KAHRAMAA requirement, however, discussion with
KAHRAMAA & QCDD for the system details will be required to be undertaken.
In the VE proposal, the original design for LV generators and temporary 11 KV generators will
retained, however, the sizes of generators will be resized based on the updated standby power
demand load due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical). Further reduction in the generators electrical special criteria.
In the VE proposal, the temporary 11 KV generators will be supplied by others for temporary
installation to operate and supply the electrical loads for Event essential load, Event critical load
and Event non-essential. However, the LV generators will be supplied by the contractor for
permanent installation within the Stadium to operate and supply the electrical loads within 10
seconds for all Life safety equipment including but not limited to life safety mechanical
equipment, fire alarm and detection systems, IT loads, selected elevators and escalators for
firefighting.
The four substations will be relocated to the pitch level 0 and the total standby power demand
load and no of generators will be updated as per the follows:
Total Total
Total
power Demand No of
VE area Demand power No of
Demand standby Generators
requirements Factor Connected Transformers
Load Load (Life safety)
Load (KVA)
(KVA) (KVA)
Milestone 4
For standby power demand load details, refer to appendix A13.1, Preliminary breakdown of the
electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Conclusion –
The Substation 1, 2, 3&4 will have one LV generator (life safety) resized for 1000 KVA each.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4.
In the original design, The LV distribution equipment serving the essential load and non-
essential load comprise of: main switchgear, sub main distribution, section boards, final
distribution boards and power isolators. The LV distribution equipment will be located inside the
stadium in a dedicated electrical /plant room. The cables supplying emergency loads will be 1
hour fire rated and routed in separate dedicated containment throughout the building.
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the Low voltage power distribution. However, the cables supplying the fire and life safety loads
will have 2 hours fire rated in lieu of 1 hour to comply with NFPA and Qatar civil defence
requirements.
For revised space planning details, refer to appendix A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant
spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design.
Conclusion –
The total cost of Low voltage power distribution system will be reduced by 20-30%.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
By using 2 hours fire rated in lieu of 1 hour, the cable cost will increase by 20-30%.
15.1.7 Power factor correction capacitors – Reduction of power factor correction sizes
and selection of alternate material
The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4
In the original design, the power factor correction capacitors equipment is sized based on the
assumed power factor and load the equipment served, so as to correct the power factor to 0.95.
Milestone 4
The power factor correction equipment will be located inside the stadium in a dedicated
electrical /plant rooms.
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the power factor correction capacitors based on the assumed power factor. A further reduction
will be achieved due to correct the power factor capacitors to 0.9 in lieu of 0.95.
Conclusion –
The total cost of the power factor correction capacitors system based on 0.9 in lieu of 0.95 will
be reduced by 20-30%
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
15.1.8 Rising Bus bar / Cables – Reduction of busbar/cables lengths and selection of
alternate material
The system information is provided in the Low voltage non-essential schematic substation 1, 2,
3&4 and Low voltage essential /life safety schematic substation1, 2, 3&4
In the original design, the rising main bus bars will be installed in the 8 nos electrical service
risers included within the Stadium. The rising bus bars will include vertical power for non-
essential and essential services thoughtout the Stadium at all levels. The voltage drop permitted
is 2.5% from the transformer secondary terminals to the furthest point in the installation.
In the original design, the generators will be connected to the life safety LV main switchboards
by multicore armoured cable/bus bar. The LV cables from the transformer secondary side will
be single core copper conductor /bus bar. The downstream cables from the main LV panel to
sub main distribution board will be multi core copper conductor, XLPE, steel wire armoured.
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the numbers and the sizes of the Bus bar /Cables will
be reduced by 20 to 30%.
Conclusion, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of the Bus bar /Cables will be reduced by 20 to
30%.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
Milestone 4
15.1.9 Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) – Reduction of batteries size and selection of
alternate material
The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs, however the uninterrupted power supply (UPS) schematic is not shown
on the drawings.
In the original design, The Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) will be included to serve the
stadium venue operations center, venue operations centers service, pitch sport lighting and
other systems (extra low voltage /IT) in the event of main supply failure. The UPS will supply all
the equipment in these control rooms for a period of 10 minutes or until the generator has taken
up the load and will be installed within electrical /plant rooms. The UPS systems will serve:
Field of play lighting 4x210 KW for 10 minutes
Emir suite-1x50KW for 10 minutes
VOC-1x30KW for 10 minutes
Main communication room(PTA) -2x150KW for 10 minutes
The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
the UPS and the batteries which will be reduced. A further reduction in UPS batteries sizes for
a period of 5 minutes in lieu of 10 minutes, will help to reduce the size of the battery room space
and battery cost.
Conclusion –The total cost of the UPS and batteries equipments based on a period of 5 minutes
in lieu of 10 minutes will reduce by 30 to 40%
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, Low voltage earthing
schematic zone 1, 2, 3&4 and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs.
In the original design, the main earthing system of the building will be a TNS system. The main
MV and LV earth bar will be included in each substation and will be wall mounted in an
accessible location. The clean and functional earthing system will be included for
commissioning of bonding selected equipment and systems for a clean network in each
communications room, incoming telecom room, plant rooms and where required for specific
items of equipments.
The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.
Conclusion –
By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-15%.
Milestone 4
The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, lightning protection
plans and 100% schematic Design-Electrical specs
In the original design, the lightning protection will include an ‘enhanced’ voltage protection level
applied to incoming telecommunications and power services to prevent damage to electrical
and electronic system within the stadium. The original design is considered the conventional
lightning protection system (Faraday Cage LPS) with lightning protection level (LPL1) in
accordance with the risk assessment completed to BS EN 62305-2.
In the original design, the LV switchboards will be equipped with integral voltage surge
suppression. The LV switchboards will have surge protection to zones1, 2 and 3 equipment and
the data /signal and telecommunication cables to protect the systems from external surges
caused by lightning strike or similar Interference.
The original design complies with the QCS specifications, KAHRAMAA and international code
requirements. Neither FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.
Conclusion –
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report and 100% schematic
Design-Electrical specs
In the original design, the cable carrying systems (containment) incudes cable trays, cable
trunking and cable baskets in the ceiling voids. The cable tray size will be designed to
accommodate the cables to run with an addition of 25% spare capacity to enable future cables
to be installed along the same routes.
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international codes requirement. Neither
FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the cost saving will be on the numbers and the sizes of
cable carrying systems(containment).
Conclusion –
Due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling load (proposed
by mechanical) the total cost of cable carrying systems (containment) system will reduce by 15
to 20%.
Milestone 4
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the Electrical Engineering Report, Small power and
communications plans.
In the original design, the general power system includes the general purpose switched socket
outlets, socket outlets, fused connection units and power, isolators of ancillary systems.
In the original design, provide white plastic finishes and accessories for all areas unless
otherwise stated. Primmum area, reception, meeting rooms, lounges, boxes, restaurants and
VIP area will have a superior and stylish finish comprising a selection of bronze, polished brass,
stainless steel and polished stainless steel to suit the architecture requirements. Plant area,
areas requiring more robust accessories and external areas shall utilize metal clad or weather
proof accessories as required.
In the original design, the number of the power outlets, IT outlets, fused connection unit outlets
and power for ancillary systems is not shown on the drawings
The original design complies with KAHRAMAA and international code requirements. Neither
FIFA nor supreme committee have any specific requirements.
In the VE proposal, due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and
cooling load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of small power and wiring devices be
reduced by 20-25%.
Conclusion –due to the reduction in total built up area (proposed by architectural) and cooling
load (proposed by mechanical) the total cost of small power and wiring devices be reduced by
20-25%.
Using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be further reduced by 20-
30%.
The system information is provided in the Supreme Committee - Renewable energy - schematic
design and Supreme Committee - Energy Strategy, however, the Photo Voltaic Panels
schematic is not shown on the drawings.
In the original design, the renewable generation proposes a total size of the PV array 1.2 MWp,
which generates around 1,650 MWh per year. Which is around 5% of the estimated annual load
(based on the GSAS assumed profile of 63 marches per year).
The original design for the PV array is 1.2 MWp, which splits the total array into 4 smaller arrays,
each with an average size around 300kWp.The selected preferred location for the proposed PV
Installation is on the main stadium roof with an approximate 6,450m2 roof area to be used.
The proposed design complies with GSAS criteria requirement. Achieving the Carbon Natural
2022 FIFA world cup is required to operate the facility in tournament mode.
Milestone 4
In the VE proposal, the Photo Voltaic Panels are not required to achieve GSAS 4 star
Certification. Hence it will be removed in the new design.
Conclusion – The cost for providing and installing Photovoltaic system can be eliminated.
In the original design, all electrical equipment and systems is specified based on USA / Japan/
UK brands.
The original vendor list complies with the international code requirements.
In the VE proposal, Consider using alternative products (Chinese, Indian, east European) which
have lower cost but of equal quality.
Conclusion –By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%.
In the original design, Mashrabiya evenly washed by LED floodlights installed on two concentric
rings of lighting columns.
In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternatives products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%
In the original design, Back-lighted panels that are located behind the openings in the ceiling or
windows in the façade. Lighting the interior of the bowl to twice the light level of the exterior,
175 lux to 150 lux.
In the VE proposal, lighting of the interior of the vessel is not recommended. Only external
façade should be lit.
Conclusion – Remove lighting specified to illuminate the interior of the Vessel. It is extra cost
and Energy consumption. 100% saving in the cost of Lighting for the Interior Vessel.
Milestone 4
Lit by floodlight columns mounted in a ring near the inner edge of the roof.
In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternatives products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%
In the original design, lighting levels mentioned. Lighting design strategy in all main areas
narrated in the report. Lighting cut sheet provided. Sufficient information provided on Interior
lighting design and no further comments.
In the VE proposal, lighting design will be reviewed and no of light fitting will be optimized
wherever possible. Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%
In the original design, lighting design is Very good. The design includes 100% of the playing
Field.
The proposed design complies with international code requirements, FIFA requirements and
the supreme committee requirement
Conclusion - No reduction
The proposed design complies with international codes requirement, FIFA requirements and
the supreme committee requirement
In the VE proposal, FIFA Minimal requirement provided. It can be hired on a temporary basis.
Conclusion – By hiring the pitch grow lighting the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.
Milestone 4
In the original design, the house lighting will serve to complement and enhance the architectural
form of the Stadium, especially when the field of play lighting is not in use.
In the VE proposal, Specified LED luminaries like Zumtobel, Erco, iGuzzini, Deltalight and
LedLinear. East Europe or Asian products to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced by
20-30%
In the original design, DALI control (via interface to DMX system) specified for Plaza lighting
(including roof and Mashrabiya) and Field of play lighting. DALI control specified for Front of
house, Back of house, Plaza. Dimmable luminaire is specified in all areas. Lighting Control
Design is comprehensive and no further comments.
In the VE proposal,
(1) Specified system from GE USA, ABB Sweden, Lutron USA, Electronic Theatre
Controls (ETC) EU. Manufacturer from East Europe or Asia to be considered.
(2) Alteration of DALI lighting controls in some areas to universal dimming FOH, BOH.
(3) No change in field lighting controls.
(4) Optimize no of panels as per the distance and location. Cost will be reduced by 20-
25% due to reduction in built area.
(5) Review the requirement for dimming controls in all areas where dimming is specified.
Conclusion - By using alternate products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced by
20-30%. By optimizing the design by above mentioned measures will reduce the cost by 10-
15%.
In the original design, Emergency luminaires are powered by Central battery system (CBS).
Emergency Lighting design will be reviewed and no of light fitting to be optimized wherever
possible.
Milestone 4
In the VE proposal, Specified LED Emergency luminaries Like CEAG. East Europe or Asian
products to be considered subject to QCDD approval.
Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%
In the original design, Aeronautical obstacle lighting provided on the fixed roof of the Stadium
In the VE proposal, specified LED Obstacle luminaries from US/ UK, manufacturer from East
Europe or Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternative products from East Europe or Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 20-30%.
15.3 Fire Detection, Alarms and Life Systems - Reduction in devices and material
cost
In the original design, Fire Alarm system designed for the complete project with total coverage
and as per QCDD requirements. In the schematic Report- 13 Nos Panels are mentioned. In
drawing and BOQ only 10 Nos FACP are indicated. These panels are networked and supervisor
PCs are located in 3 locations – Event control center (1), Event control center (2) & SWOCC.
Fire Alarm layout for FOH & BOH areas are provided. Fire Alarm layout for concourse area are
missing (Notification devices). 72 hours’ backup battery is specified. 24 hours required as per
QCDD. Battery size can be reduced from 72 hours’ backup to 24 hours’ backup.
System required is as per QCDD and Life safety code and the proposed system meets QCDD
requirements. All devices and equipment shall be QCDD approved. FIFA and SC referrers to
QCDD requirements for Fire Alarm and detection system.
In the VE proposal,
(1) Optimize number of panels as per the distance and location. Since there is reduction in
total built up area, the number of Fire Alarm devices will also be proportionately
reduced. Number of FACPs can be reduced to 8 Panels.
(2) Use alternate QCDD approved vendors other than specified brands (Notifier USA,
Siemon USA, Gent UK, Honeywell USA).
(3) 72 hours’ backup battery is specified. 24 hours backup required as per QCDD. Battery
size will be reduced from 72 hours’ backup to 24 hours’ backup
Conclusion - There can be 20% reduction in number of devices and installation cost due to
reduction in total built up area. Also cost reduction in material procurement to be 20-30% if
Milestone 4
procured from alternate manufacturer. Reduction in battery cost by 66% when battery backup
is changed from 72 hours to 24 hours.
PAVA system includes sport entertainment audio broadcast, public address broadcast,
Emergency Voice Alarm communication and concert support within stadium bowl.
In the original design, Emergency Voice Alarm communication provides mass notification
information to the public and staff and will complement the managed phased evacuation
proposed for the Stadium in event mode. The PA system will form part of the fire warning and
will be interfaced with the Fire Detection and Alarm System (FDAS). Voice alarm Layout
drawings provided for areas except concourse areas. There will be extensive amount of
speakers in stadium bowl area and are missing in the design. No Quantities available.
System required is as per QCDD and Life safety code the proposed system meets QCDD
requirements. FIFA and SC referrers to QCDD / Life safety code requirements for Voice
evacuation system.
In the VE proposal, Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered. All devices and
equipment shall be QCDD approved.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30%.
The original design includes the supply and installation for High power, high quality loudspeaker
systems to deliver full frequency range music to audiences within the Stadium bowl. The system
will provide the Audio broadcast to the Stadium bowl. Only report is available. No other design
information is provided.
In the VE proposal, vendors and products that meet SC Requirements from East Europe / Asia
to be considered instead of current specified manufacturers from US and UK (Philips Bosh
Netherland/USA, TOA Japan, Ateis Switzerland/UK, BSS‐Harman Pro UK) which are
expensive.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30%.
Milestone 4
In the original design, the PA system within the Stadium bowl is designed to provide support to
an external concert audio production system temporarily installed on the field of play to facilitate
concert use in legacy. It provides dedicated secondary audio network configurable for concert
sound.
In the VE proposal, Concert support for the stadium bowl can be deleted from main scope.
Concert PA system can be provided by the event organizers at each event. Only infrastructure
required for the system to be provided.
Conclusion – The cost for providing and installing a Concert support PA system can be
eliminated.
In the original design, the Emergency Telephone (Intercom) system has been provided to
secure communication between the Venue Operations Centre and the key stewarding points
around the Stadium. The system include a secure communications channel for match day, used
as a back-up to the steward’s radios.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, the Fire Telephone system is to be used for communication between the
Venue Operations Centre and each main landing of each exit stairway and the sprinkler pump
room. The system include for a secure communications channel for use as a back-up to the fire
service radios.
In the VE proposal,
(1) Each Fire Telephone housed in wall mounted steel enclosure. QCDD approved Electro
Galvanized sheet enclosure to be used.
(2) Use alternate QCDD approved vendors other than Notifier USA, Siemen USA, Gent
UK, Honeywell USA"
Milestone 4
Conclusion – By using Electro Galvanized sheet enclosure cost can be reduced by 50%. By
using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 10-30%.
In the original design, Emergency communication intercom system will be used for a means of
communication between all the fire escape refuge points on each level of the building and a
central control position at the Venue Operations Centre.
In the VE proposal, Alternate QCDD approved vendors other than Notifier USA, Siemen USA,
Gent UK, Honeywell USA" to be considered.
Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 10-30%.
In the original design, System provides facility to call for assistance using wall mounted call
buttons/pull cord from disabled people’s facilities including disabled toilets, disabled shower
rooms and Hygiene Suites.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, Referees call system is provided to indicate to the players and Royal
suites when the match is about to start.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-30% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
Milestone 4
In the original design, Information communication and technology system includes of SCS, LAN,
Central clock, MOI, Mobile cellular infrastructure, DAS, SEAC.
In the original design, ICT rooms have been provided within the Stadium to accommodate ICT,
AV and enable the delivery of IP related services. Spaces included for MOI communication,
Cellular equipment room, Telecommunication carrier room, Radio equipment room, External
mobile / Radio equipment spaces, Primary Technical areas and Secondary Technical areas.
In the VE proposal, approx. 2300Sq.m of space is used for ICT. Since there is reduction in total
built up area, there will be a reduction of 26% in the key ICT spaces
Conclusion – Cost reduction in ICT spaces and equipment by 20-30% inclusive of racks, power,
HVAC requirements
In the original design, SCS infrastructure consists of Backbone Cabling Distribution, Horizontal
Cabling Distribution, Floor standing equipment cabinets and Data outlets. Typical schematic
and outlet quantity per room is provided. Cat 6A cabling is specified.
In the VE proposal,
1) No. of RJ45 outlets to be optimized as per FIFA & SC requirement. There will be reduction
in no of outlets by 20-25% due to reduction in built-up area.
2) TE Connectivity USA, Panduit USA, Brand Rex UK, Belden UK/ Canada, Corning Cables,
Siemen USA, Systimax USA specified. Alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be
considered.
Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 30-50%. The cost of SCS will be reduced by 20-25 % due to reduction in built-up
area
In the original design, WLAN coverage is provided in all public and back of house areas. WiFi
infrastructure provision (cabling, trunking, power etc.) only is included in the scope. Only RJ45
Outlets are provided. Access points and system are not included in the contract. WLAN outlet
Milestone 4
Layout provided for areas except concourse areas. Outlet quantity for WLAN are indicated in
the drawings. Cat 6A cabling is specified.
In the VE proposal, No of WLAN outlets to be optimized as per FIFA & SC requirement. There
will be reduction in no. of outlets by 20-25% due to reduction in built area.
Conclusion – The cost can be reduced by 20-25 % due to reduction in built-up area.
In the original design, the building LAN provide a common transportation platform for all
operational systems requiring the transmission of voice, video and data traffic over an IP
network. All passive IT Infrastructure including structured cabling, cable trays, conduiting,
Racks, etc is included in the scope. Active components are not in scope.
In the VE proposal, Cisco UK/USA, HP UK/USA, Juniper UK/USA, Alcatel Lucent UK/USA,
Extreme Networks UK/USA specified. Alternate manufacturers from Asia to be considered.
Conclusion – By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be
reduced by 30-50%.
In the original design, a central clock system to synchronize network based devices to a
common time source is provided. The system will receive its reference time signals from GPS
satellites and will distribute the time signals to IP enabled devices connected to the building
data network via access switches.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, the project has provided space, containment and power supply provision
for mobile operator to design, supply and install their in-building and external coverage public
cellular mobile solution at the Lusail Stadium. DAS system is specified. Only report is available.
No other design information is provided.
Milestone 4
In the original design, Four PMR systems are identified: Venue Operator TETRA system,
Tournament PMR system, MOI TETRA system and MOI 4G LTE system.
In the original design, Venue Operator TETRA system will provide Venue operations and
management team with trunked radio system to manage the day-to-day operations of the
Stadium.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturer from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% than US / UK manufacturers.
15.4.10 MOI TETRA system & MOI 4G LTE system - Reduction in material cost
In the original design, MOI will require two separate PMR systems comprising of MOI TETRA
and MOI 4G LTE within the Stadium for their staff and personnel.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 10-15% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
Milestone 4
15.4.11 Spectator Electronic Access Control System (SEAC) - Reduction in material cost
The original design includes system to control spectators’ access to a stadium. Valid tickets
enable entry via automated turnstiles. Turnstiles and passive infrastructure are included in the
scope.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturers are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, the IPTV system will allow for distribution of TV channels and locally
produced video content (ie stream from the Press Conference Centre). System is provided in
SKY Boxes, VIP boxes, Concourse areas, Lobby area, Office spaces & Meeting rooms.
In the VE proposal, Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, Toshiba Japan specified. Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40%.
Designed for Luxurious game experience within Hospitality Box is included in the original
design.
In the VE proposal,
Milestone 4
2) Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA, Yamaha Japan.
Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - Optimising no. of Hospitality boxes and by using alternate manufacturers from East
Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.
In the original design, larger office spaces to be used for small meetings hence will be equipped
with displays with integrated speakers. Users can watch the IPTV content and connect their
laptops to a USB camera for video conference calls. Office spaces to be equipped with 42” full
HD/UHD display with integrated speakers.
In the VE proposal,
2) Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea, Sharp Japan, Sony
Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA, Yamaha Japan.
Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - Optimising no. of AV equipped offices to be done in detail design stage. By using
alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced by 30-40%.
In the original design, the AV system in the room will provides Presentation facilities, Audio and
video conferencing facilities and IPTV display. 5 Meeting spaces provided with AV system -
FIFA GC meeting room, Match coordination meeting room, FIFA protocol room, Stadium
Operation meeting room and Conference room.
In the VE proposal, Screen specified- Panasonic Japan, Philips Netherland, Samsung Korea,
Sharp Japan, Sony Japan, and Toshiba Japan. Speakers specified - Bose USA, JBL UK/USA,
Yamaha Japan. Alternate manufacturers from Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40%.
Milestone 4
In the original design, the main purpose of the press conference area is to provide facilities for
pre/post-match media events and also used for lectures, video projections and corporate
events. Press conference area include Press conference room, SI Booths and AV control room.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, Digital signage system is deployed to provide static images and video
content around the Stadium.
Conclusion - The cost can be reduced by 30-50 % by using manufacturer from Asia. Location
of Digital signage to be optimized during detail design stage.
In the original design, Room booking system consist of centrally located servers to support
authorised users to search available spaces and make bookings by room number, building
location or business function.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, two Giant screens with Control room and all equipment are provided.
Control room layout is available. Screen details are not available.
Milestone 4
In the VE proposal, Draper USA, Dalite USA, Stewart USA specified. Alternate manufacturers
that meet SC Requirements from Europe / Asia to be considered
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 30-40% compared to US / UK manufacturers.
In the original design, the Building Management System (BMS) provide automatic control and
monitoring of all HVAC plant and equipment and monitoring of public health systems equipment.
HVAC control is missing in the BMS section.
In the VE proposal, there is no reduction in system. Manufacturer are not specified in the
document. Manufacturers from East Europe / Asia to be considered.
Conclusion - By using alternate manufacturers from East Europe / Asia, the cost can be reduced
by 15-20% than US / UK manufacturers. HVAC control to be added and are a cost plus.
Milestone 4
16.1 Introduction
This section of the report provides value engineering proposals for the façade of the original
Fosters and Partners scheme. Inhabits main focus for the value engineering of the façade has
been reducing the vessel area by shifting the vessel profile inwards and reducing the height of
the vessel and rationalising the vessel façade whilst providing value engineering solutions
considering but not limited to the following;
Material Selection
Installation
Specification Requirements
Buildability
Sustainability
Tournament and Legacy Modes
Milestone 4
The indicative locations of the façade types which correspond to the project specification are
shown below:
Milestone 4
Within the following sections Inhabit have identified the VE opportunities that are most feasible
given all considerations for each façade system, Geometry and Performance.
Within this section Inhabit shall identify all each façade system and the proposed key Value
Engineering opportunities available at this stage and the risks and considerations associated
with said VE. Notwithstanding much of the focus has been around significant VE of the Vessel
façade itself.
No Significant VE can be obtained at this stage, however main VE for this system is as follows;
Changing the Anodized finish to Polyester Powder Coating would provide a cost saving.
The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample.
The above VE would provide a combined saving of approximately 10% for this system.
16.2.1.2 EWS-102
This system is to be treated as a weather seal line only, therefore removing the thermal
requirement of the system, thus leading to a drastic reduction in material cost as Single glazing
can be utilised removing the IGU requirement.
The considerations associated with the above VE would be that the unit facades, “internal walls
and glazing” are to be the thermal line therefore potentially increased cost associated with said
Milestone 4
walls, notwithstanding this cost of the increased requirement of the internal walls is much less
that the saving associated with reduction in a more complicated façade which is the Vessel.
The cost saving associated with said VE would be approximately 60% for this system.
The proposal for how this system shall be assembled and installed is detailed below.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Whilst this proposal increases the glass area, this removes unnecessary interface complications
and variation of materials.
This system could terminate below the calligraphy band leaving the calligraphy mashrabiya
open and the roof area behind open to the elements, should this be considered a prevision must
be made to ensure that sufficient drainage etc is allowed for in this new external zone.
The risk associated with the above VE would be the potential overheating of the roof zone.
Milestone 4
16.2.1.3 EWS-106
Integrate into EWS 102 system. Please refer to EWS-102 for description and detail.
This system is to be treated as a weather seal line only, therefore removing the thermal
requirement of the system, thus leading to a drastic reduction in material cost as n mineral wool
to be used behind cladding panel therefore only aesthetics to be achieved from this system .
16.2.1.4 EWS-501
The VE that could be obtained from this system is a change in the material selection, Please
the specified GFRC with an aluminium alternative.
The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample as the overall aesthetics may be altered.
Dependant on the chosen design a poetical saving of 25% could be obtained for this system.
Changing the Anodized finish to Polyester Powder Coating would provide a cost saving.
Replace the fire rated glazed façade to each staircase with a different material ie concrete
allowing operable vent inserts in order to comply with QCD-FS requirements.
The associated risk with said VE would be client approval, these changes would be subject to
an approved sample.
Additional consideration must be made to the Legacy mode especially with respect to the non-
insulated façade, additional requirements may be required during this mode should the internal
use differ from that of the tournament mode.
An additional saving of approximately 10% could be obtained for this system dependant on the
chosen solution.
16.2.1.6 EWS-701
No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.
16.2.1.7 AM-501
16.2.1.8 AM-601
Given the significant VE gained from other systems inhabit would not recommend VE be taken
from this system as the potential saving would be minimal and extremely differ the intent.
Milestone 4
16.2.1.9 RFS-301
No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.
16.2.1.10 RFS-302
No significant VE at this stage, the system should where possible remain a proprietary system
in order to maintain minimal cost.
16.2.1.11 RFS-601
The main consideration for the roof cladding is whether the roof itself is to remain following the
tournament when the stadium enters legacy mode. Without this decision being made it is difficult
at this stage to provide a validated VE solution.
It is Inhabits understanding that a VE concept of making the roof flat has been proposed, the
risk associated with said proposal is that the current design intent is significantly altered and
given the stadium in question it may be difficult be gain approval.
The main consideration for the roof cladding is whether the roof itself is to remain following the
tournament when the stadium enters legacy mode. Given the sheltered location of this system,
it could be removed all together.
The risk of the VE is client approval, as it may be considered that the internal viewing experience
is altered.
Given the sheltered condition of this system a PVC coated polyester fabric solution may be
proposed should this system remain.
The risk of the VE would be that the design life would be reduced.
16.2.2 General
16.2.2.1 Geometry
It is important to note, the top and bottom lip are intrinsically linked due to mathematics, if the
methodology of geometry in the contract documents is followed. The below mark-up
demonstrates this
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Below is a rendering showing the surface as per the original contract documentation in red,
whilst a best guess of the proposed VE surface is shown in green, note the appearance of
curvature will be less pronounced for the VE option as can be seen.
Other curves / a modified curve strategy could be investigated further investigation required.
Milestone 4
16.2.2.2 Performance
The below marked up section identifies the understanding of the design team with respect to
how each key area of the façade is intende to perform as a value engineered solution.
Milestone 4
Within this section Inhabit have identified the current design parameters which form basis of
much of the value engineering proposals.
The below are extracts from the above report that are to be considered when proposing VE.
The double curved surface of the vessel sets the geometric definition and panelisation of the
facade. The facade is composed of flat panels which are supported by 3D adjustable brackets
off the steel structure. The panels are triangular along the diagonal grids to follow the warp of
the surface. The facade grid follows the steel structure and emphasizes the diagrids on the
exterior with feature clad elements. These elements are a visual continuation of the internal
steel structure. Primary and secondary steel members are linear (not curved) and set out on a
triangular grid arrangement to follow the curved geometry of the vessel.
The General Admission level finishes are practical and durable, a minimal palette of exposed
concrete or plasterboard walls and epoxy concrete flooring allow the golden vessel facade to
take centre stage.
The FIFA Outer Security Perimeter will be outside the Stadium façade but not on the
‘edge of the Stadium as described but limited to turnstiles
The FIFA Inner Security Perimeter will be represented by the Stadium turnstiles and
aligned with the building façade and includes mag and bag
300m Security Perimeter; No Large Vehicles within this on match days
100m Perimeter. No cars or other vehicles within this without security clearance
Outer Security perimeter to be Edge of Stadium to be Mag and bag
Inner security perimeter to be the Ticket check and turnstiles Adjacent Building Security
dealt with by others
LRT (Light Rail Transit) security dealt with by others
Iconic architectural facade lighting will be employed to give Lusail Stadium a different look and
feel associated with its unique architectural character; and highlighting of entrances and aid in
orientation to be a primary consideration.
In order to gain GSAS credits for review of environmental impact, light spill calculations will be
provided.
Façade lighting will be sensitive to surrounding uses and inhabitants. Tungsten halogen lamps
will not be used and wherever possible, LED’s will be utilised for architectural lighting as the
light source of choice as appropriate for the Schematic Design Stage.
Fire access roads, hard-standing, and fire access openings at façade will be provided in
accordance with QCDFSS 4.1, where access to a floor is possible from the exterior
Milestone 4
The below are extracts from the above report that are to be considered when proposing VE.
The structure forms the skeleton for the stadium, supporting the bowl, roof and facade. A rigid
concrete seating bowl is held by concrete cores and columns, housing all of the terracing and
accommodation areas of the stadium. The roof is supported by tubular steel columns, each
oriented to meet at the apex and base, forming circumferentially stiff ‘V’s. After extensive testing
this system emerged as the most efficient solution.
The concept of the outer steel vessel system is to create the impression of a ‘floating’ stadium,
separated from the ground, a discreet concrete plinth supporting the structure above. The
triangular steel structure provides a strong starting-point for the image of the stadium to be
shaped upon.
Milestone 4
The exterior cladding of the stadium forms the main architectural design feature to be seen by
spectators. This golden vessel not only provides a unique visual identity, but also serves as a
major element in protecting users from the harsh climatic conditions.
The double curved surface of the vessel sets the geometric definition and panelisation of the
facade. The facade is composed of flat panels which are supported by 3D adjustable brackets
off the steel structure. The panels are triangular along the diagonal grids to follow the warp of
the surface. The adjacent panels was designed as triangular panels to minimise the overall
number of panels and joints. The facade grid follows the steel structure and emphasizes the
diagrids on the exterior with feature clad elements. These elements are a visual continuation of
the internal steel structure. The facade is cladded with GRC panels with glazing at the plaza
level to allow views onto the plaza and beyond. The area could be glazed where additional
daylight is desired.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The architectural image of the stadium as a true vessel-like shape is greatly achieved by its
perfect integration with the roof.
One of the key drivers of the roof’s geometry is its relation to the seating bowl. A continuous
clearance band over the top of the last tier and the roof achieves a seamless spatial integration
and assists in producing a floating roof appearance.
The roof has a clear span of over 320m over the entire footprint of the stadium arena and seating
bowl without intermediate supports. The roof structure will be the world’s largest tensile cable-
net roof in a stadium. It has the form of a hyperbolic paraboloid surface, which increases
structural efficiency compared to a flat surface. The roof structure comprises of 48 radial cable
grids connecting to a large diameter compression ring at the perimeter, and twin tension rings
at the oculus over the field of play. The compression ring is supported on 24 points where the
inclined V-columns are tied to the bowl.
The roof cladding system contributes significantly in achieving players’ and spectators’
environmental comfort, as well as reducing energy consumption. Two layers of PTFE coated
membranes cladding systems reduce the impact of solar heat transmittance significantly, and
at the same time provides a cavity which reduces the impact of the hot prevailing wind on
thermal comfort. The design of oculus combined with the calligraphy band responds the
requirements for the wind strategy.
All services such as lights, speakers and access gantries are fully integrated within the roof
cavity, resulting in a unified and smooth soffit.
Milestone 4
Current Specification
The table identifies the specification and requirements for each system in accordance with the
original design intent.
System
Specification
Ref
As per specification 84423, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84423, Low-iron glass (but indicated as clear on other
Section)
As per specification 84423, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-101
pitch 0.7
As per specification 84423, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84423,Double Laminated glass, Inhabits current
understanding of this requirement is due to a Ballistics requirement.
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low-Iron Glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
EWS-102 As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass Inhabits current
understanding of this requirement is due to a Ballistics requirement.
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Sound Insulation Rw 34dB
As per specification 84400, Thermally broken system
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-103 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-104 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
As per specification 84400, 1-hour fire rated
As per specification 84400, U-Value average 1.7 W/m2K
As per specification 84400, Low Iron glass
As per specification 84400, G-Value on ground floor glazing 0.2, glazing facing
EWS-105 pitch 0.7
As per specification 84400,For VVIP and Emir levels: Ballistic Rating Class FB 4
As per specification 84400, Blast Resistant
As per specification 84400, Finish colour anodized
As per specification 84400, Double Laminated glass
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The current condition of the main façade consists of the “vessel” which surrounds the seating
bowl. The geometry and height varies around the perimeter, with signage along the upper rim
being Arabic calligraphy. A lightweight roof covers the seating area to protect spectators from
sun, heat and sand. The following sections of the report analyse the current design, and
identifies areas for improvement.
The Vessel
One consideration for the project is that it is expected that after World Cup 2022 the stadium
enters a “legacy” phase where alternative uses may be sought, which need to be considered
and may allow for design efficiencies considering the change in building usage.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
A double glass unit with double laminated glazing for both the outer and inner pane is
extremely expensive for the following reasons:
Triangular double glass unit are generally not sealed in the automatic line due to their
shape. Assembly these glazing manually has an important impact on cost.
When ordering triangular glass the buyer will generally have to pay the area of the
rectangle which include the shaped glass. While some optimization is possible, given
the amount of glazing, the wastage will still be quite significant.
Laminated heat treated glass (e.g. H.S. of F.T.) are expensive as the glass need to
be cut and then laminated.
A monolithic laminated glass would achieve the required sound insulation (i.e. Rw 34)
For the above reasons replacing the double glass unit with a monolithic laminated glass would
as a minimum half the glass price.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
16.5.4 EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503 Ground GFRC Screen and Glazing Ground Floor
Details
Milestone 4
16.6.1 Vessel
Simplify the Vessel geometry to allow for large panel repetition (i.e. reduce number of
different cladding panel types.
Tournament Mode will happen in winter so there is no requirement for thermal insulation
on the Vessel façade. Double glass unit may be replaced with single laminated glass as
Bomb Blast resistance is required. Insulation material (e.g. mineral wool or rigid board)
can be omitted. For Legacy mode the internal facades (smaller quantity) can provide
thermal insulation and water/air barrier [EWS-106].
Replace expensive colored anodized finish of aluminium claddings with powder coat or
PVDF 1.1.3finish [EWS-106, AM-501].
Eliminate glass floors which may have additional fire-rating requirements.
Eliminate the fire-rated glass curtain wall in staircase cores, and replace with fire-rated
solid wall (e.g. pre-cast), or reduce glazing area from full curtain wall to punch fire-rated
windows within pre-cast walls.
Eliminate the GRC screen Type A (Ground Floor Mesh) and replace with expanded
mesh or pattern on metal [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503].
Eliminate the GRC screen Type B (GRC screen in front of wall) and replace with
expanded mesh or pattern on metal [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-503].
Eliminate the GRC screen Type C (GRC screen in front of glazing) and replace with
expanded mesh or use fritting on glass to mimic pattern [EWS-501, EWS-502, EWS-
503].
Incorporate bowl mesh pattern within fritting pattern of IGU for clear locations.
Consider removing CWCT requirements, as American standards can typically be
concluded in less time.
16.6.2 Bowl
The external façade is blast resistant to protect from an external explosion. Why are the
bowl façades blast resistant as well? Specifications Section 084400 require blast
Milestone 4
resistant glazing for facades facing the pitch [EWS-101, EWS-107]. Most of these
facades include doors which are not blast proof.
16.6.3 Roof
Remove lower cladding of dual skin Roof, which as only aesthetic function [RFS-602,
RFS-604].
Explore reduction in performance of Roof fabric from PTFE to PVC coated polyester
fabric for lower cladding (not exposed to UV and less exposed to rain) or for both skins
[RFS-601, RFS-602, RFS-604].
We note that .35 has been requested for opaque areas and 2.2 for vision, it is difficult to
assess the efficiency of these statements with respect to the building envelope
performance in the absence of knowing the areas of each of these items. This does not
appear to be a considered assessment
This report also suggests to be Double Glazed and seems to be specifying minimum
performance criteria to suit local regulations without considering consequence of
weighted areas and values, proper evaluation is recommend of a project of this scale
and could lead to a lack of efficiencies and over design if not considered.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
o When ordering triangular glass the buyer will generally have to pay the area of
the rectangle which include the shaped glass. While some optimization is
possible, given the amount of glazing, the wastage will be anyway quite
significant.
o Laminated heat treated glass (e.g. H.S. of F.T.) are expensive as the glass need
to be cut and then laminated.
For the above reasons replacing the double glass unit with a monolithic laminated glass
would as a minimum half the glass price.
A monolithic laminated glass would achieve the required sound insulation (i.e. Rw 34)
An additional saving is given by using a not thermally broken aluminum system.
Façade geometry
While a new proposal for the entire geometry of the stadium is under
development/evaluation by the team a general consideration of the façade geometry
has to be mentioned.
The façade is clearly faceted (i.e. profiles and glass are not curved), however different
levels of faceting can be realized. Each of these levels/options will have an impact with
regard to cost and visual appearance.
The image above shows different options for the faceted curtain wall
Milestone 4
It is clear that the larger is the plane the less expensive is the facade, but also that the larger is
the deviation from the original design intent.
This item will be explored and developed in the next Report Issue.
16.7.3 EWS-103 - Capless stick curtain wall
Milestone 4
This façade is located at the Bow at the Media Presentation Studios. It is constituted by an
aluminium frame color anodized and glazing.
This façade is located at the Vessel. It is constituted by an aluminium frame color anodized and
glazing.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
This is the vertical cladding at the Ground Floor underneath the Vessel envelope. It is
constituted by a GFRC “Ribbed” cladding.
This façade is similar to EWS-501 and equally located at Ground Floor, however it has a second
glazed skin behind the GFRC screen.
Milestone 4
Replace the actual GFRC cladding with Aluminium Expanded mesh painted PVDF or Powder
coating.
We propose either PVDF or powder coating to AAMA 2605 for exterior and AAMA 2604
for interior.
Milestone 4
This is a glazed façade at each staircase and it is fire rated. It can be replaced with solid
precast or with precast with opening to accommodate a fire rated window.
This façade is similar to EWS-501 and equally located at Ground Floor, however is located in
front of a solid wall.
Milestone 4
This is an aluminium louver system which may be resolved with an off-the-shelf extrusion so
that we cannot see any possible cost reduction.
This is the cladding fascia at the top of the Vessel. It is constituted by aluminium cladding panels
similar to the façade EWS-106 but without glazing as infill element. The central triangle is open.
Milestone 4
This façade is located at the internal area of the stadium, however we could not find exact
location on the drawings provided. It is constituted by minimum 3mm aluminium solid sheet with
paint system.
This façade is located at the internal are of the stadium. It is constituted by 2-hour fire rated
glass floor panels.
Milestone 4
Standing seam roof is a common and economical solution for the roofing system. At this stage
we don’t see any opportunity for potential VE options.
Standing seam roof is a common and economical solution for the roofing system. At this stage
we don’t see any opportunity for potential VE options.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
16.7.19 RFS-604 - Tensile PTFE fabric bottom skin @ Roof Acoustically Transparent
Milestone 4
This section of the report presents some VE opportunities for the external envelope. Generally
two approaches are presented:
Review of proposed facade and show possible VE options within (or very close to) the
design intent (Classified as Type A)
Proposal of VE items that deviates considerably from the original design intent
(classified as Type B).
16.8.1 EWS-501/502/503
These façades are located at Level +6.600 (Lower Tier Entrance). They are composed by GRC
panels, undulated large panels at lower level and four types of horizontal “baguettes” at upper
level.
There are three variation where the external screen is the same, while the background is
different:
EWS-501: GRC supported by steel structure.
EWS-502: GRC in front of glazed facade.
EWS-501: GRC in front of concrete wall.
Each panel appears to be 3 meters wide, which corresponds to the support spacing. The
supporting structure is composed by vertical hollow sections (primary) with 2, 3 or 4 rows of
horizontal secondary member depending on the location (façade height).
It should be noted that the lower panel, expected to weight more than 500 kg, in some locations
is operable (bi-fold type).
Milestone 4
Type 4
Primary
vertical
Type 3
Type 2
Secondary
horizontal
“Baguette” type
GRC
Type 1
Undulated pane
By changing the connection detail of the GRC panels the at least 3 out of the 4 horizontal
members (secondary) can be omitted. All the “Baguettes” are in fact connected directly to the
vertical member.
Milestone 4
Omit
horizontal
members
H
Varies along the facade
The vertical member can be optimized as the span varies along the façade. The vertical steel
can be grouped in 2-4 sections in order to minimize steel tonnage.
Milestone 4
Horizontal
member
omitted
Curved
Horizontal
member
omitted
16.8.1.3 Replace the GRC panels with aluminium sheets and extrusions (Type B)
GRC panel could be replaced with aluminium. This works particularly well when the façade is
facetted rather than curved. The “baguettes” would be replaced by aluminium extrusions (4 dies)
while the large undulated panel with aluminum sheets.
The larger extrusion (“baguette” type 1) would have dimension 160x275mm, for which the die
is feasible.
Milestone 4
The limitation however happens for the undulated panel. This is 3000mm wide and 2575mm
high. Aluminium sheet of such size are not available. This means that the lower panel should
be split into two adding a vertical joint in the middle.
Primary
vertical
3000mm c/c
Secondary
horizontal behind
aluminum profile
Tertiary vertical
behind cladding
It requires as well a vertical tertiary vertical member at the undulated sheet joint.
Primary vertical
3000mm c/c
Secondary horizontal
Tertiary vertical
It should be noted that while this additional joint appears to be a major deviation, this condition
occurs even in the Foster’s design at the door.
Milestone 4
Modulation 3000mm
Modulation 1500mm
This bi-fold door is quite heavy with the GRC panel and will require a fully bespoke system while
by using aluminium sheet an off-the-shelf door may be adopted.
Since the façade is curved aluminium extrusions should be curved as well the undulated sheet.
The curved extrusion is expensive and the curved undulated sheet is not practical. For this
reason this option works in combination with the facetted proposal described in the following
Section.
This façade is not straight in plan and it is show in the image below. The layout is an alternation
of convex and concave shapes with mainly two radii (31.840m and 17.860m)
R=
17.860m
See next
image
R=
31.840m
Milestone 4
The image below shows a facetted façade based on a 3m wide panels (i.e. as per the design
intent). For the larger radius the curve is still quite smooth with angle between panels equal to
5 degrees. For the smaller radius the angle is 9 degrees.
Of course by reducing the panel width (e.g. 2 meters) the curve would be smoother but this
would increase the steel structure density and eventually the total tonnage which may be totally
or partially compensated by the removal of the horizontal members (refer to Section 16.8.1.1)
The areas shown in the image above should be investigated further as faceting does not seem
to be an option given the small radius.
Milestone 4
Facetted
Facetted
Milestone 4
16.8.2 EWS-102/106
These façades are located approximately between Level +21.950 (Lower Compression Ring)
and Level +62.49 (Upper Ring). They are composed of steel frames, aluminium extrusions,
aluminium cladding, insulation and glazing.
Vessel Facade
The cladding system is referenced as two system numbers but given the same title:
EWS-102 – Metal Panel Vessel Cladding
EWS-106 – Metal Panel Vessel Cladding
Milestone 4
This section will describe potential VE options to explore for each element. Independent
engineering calculations will have to be performed on any final sizing of framing elements. Any
sizing shown here is comparative based on the information contained in the final scheme
design.
The primary frame is made up of a double skin diagrid steel frame. Two potential VE options
can be explored:
The raking columns appear to mainly only support the façade self-weight. Since most of the
façade load is on the exterior, the dead load will mainly be carried by the external frame skin,
little load appears to be transferred to the interior frame skin. This option can be further
analysed to confirm the stresses and deflection on the exterior frame skin when the interior skin
is removed.
Milestone 4
Horizontal Wind
Interior frame skin Load Truss
External frame
skin
The raking columns mainly support the dead load that is transferred from the façade to the
horizontal wind load truss. The incline makes these columns less efficient for transferring dead
loads, since some load causes bending. These raking columns could be eliminated with a
central column to support the dead loads on the horizontal trusses. This would be a more
efficient design. The external view of seeing triangular patterns would not change, with the new
columns only visible from the inside. The columns would also run behind several windows.
This aesthetic changes internally and externally would need to be evaluated architecturally for
approval.
Eliminate raking
steel columns
Vertical column
(green) to support
dead load of truss
Milestone 4
The secondary frame supports the triangular cladding panels. Typically 16 secondary triangular
frames fit within the primary triangular steelwork. The scheme design estimates a steel member
size of 350mmx250mm RHS sections. It should be noted as this is a frame, it means that there
are two adjacent 350mmx250mm members.
350mm x 250mm x 6
Steel RHS
Currently the secondary steel is supported at the three corner points, leave the steel members
unsupported across their length. Given the long spans, on the order of up to 12m, 2
intermediate supports could be added to fix the secondary frame back to the primary steelwork.
The additional restraints would allow for smaller member sizes.
Milestone 4
Below shows the effect of the additional restraint on the member sizes. This summary estimates
a deflection limit of span/200 on the unsupported member length.
With no intermediate restraints, the secondary steel frame is a series of simply supported
beams, uniformly loaded. For comparative and conservative analysis, a uniformly distributed
wind load has been assumed.
The deflection formula for a simply supported beam under uniform load is:
5wL4
deflection = 384EI w = linear wind load
1
L = total length of the beam
E = Modulus of Elasticity
I1 = Moment of inertia of current beam size
Milestone 4
The deflection formula for a continuous beam with 4 supports under uniform load is:
0.0069wL4
deflection = I2 = Moment of inertia of option S1
EI2
By equating the two equations, and assuming the deflection limit of the unsupported length of
the beam is span/200, I2 (VE option S1) = 0.132I1 (original member moment of inertia).
The 350x250x6mm RHS original members moment of inertia is approximately 1.27 x 10^8
mm^4.
This could potentially realize a reduction of 40% in the weight of the secondary steel.
It is noted this VE option for the secondary frame is not possible if P2 for the primary steel is
chosen.
The current design has each secondary frame triangle act completely independently. This
means both frames are the same size. If the frames interlocked, a more efficient design could
be realized to save steel, if each system interlocked to share the load, one frame could be
deeper (a more efficient design against wind load, with the adjacent frame being smaller.
A simple comparison can be made to determine if a more efficient design can be made to save
weight.
Potential alternative = 1nos. 450mm x 250mm x 8mm RHS + smaller adjacent frame interlocked
Milestone 4
Minor secondary
frame
1 x 450mm x 250mm x 8 RHS moment of inertia = 30082 cm4 (by inspection this frame will
resist all the wind loads)
Area = 109 cm2
Weight/m = 85.4 kg/m
A preliminary comparison shows this could result in up to a 20% reduction in weight of the
secondary steel work.
Milestone 4
Minor secondary
frame
Interlocking Pin
restraint
450mm x 250mm x
8 Steel RHS
Secondary Frame
The final design of the minor design would need to be determined at the following stage. But
an overall narrower sight width is possible, with a 20% reduction in weight.
Having different steel depths adjacent to one another may affect the aesthetic look and therefore
an architectural decision would need to be made if it is acceptable.
16.8.2.7 Panels
The panels are currently designed as a buildup of various elements fixed to the secondary
steelwork: cladding bracket system, an aluminium casing, acoustic insulation, main panel frame,
DGU window, thermal insulation, and frame capping.
Milestone 4
To Be Further Developed.
Glass reinforced plastic (GRP) or glass fiber reinforced plastic (GFRP) is a composite material
where glass fibers are embedded in plastic polymers (e.g. epoxy or polyester resins). It offers
a good structural strength and it is lightweight. This would offers an advantage of reducing the
secondary steel structure. GRP elements are generally moulded and can be produced in
practically any shape. Resistance to fire has to be carefully evaluated as not all resins are
suitable to limit material combustibility. Generally fillers are added to the main resin to enhance
fire resistance. Bomb-blast resistance will need to be analysed further.
Because of the molding process for GRP, complex node shapes can produced with smooth
interfaces and no welding or joints. Below is an example of a GRP mould of a node joint
between triangular GRP extrusions
Milestone 4
Triangular extruded shapes can formed to incorporate both solid cladding and glazing.
Milestone 4
The photos below shows and example of GRP extrusions being used for the Pearl Dive Centre,
Dubai.
Milestone 4
Below is an example of a cross section of an FRP composite frame that incorporates glazing.
FRP has better thermal properties than aluminium which would reduce the amount of insulation
required on solid wall panels.
GRP can be finished with a metallic paint to achieve the desired appearance for the Lusail
stadium or else clad in a thin 0.8mm aluminium sheet with the desired finish bonded to the GRP
panel.
GRP is cost-effective when there is a repeated pattern than reduces the number of mold
required. (This will work well with the proposed simplified geometry, shown below.
Milestone 4
The size of each large triangle (‘mega-grid) do not allow transportation of a single GRP panel
so that the panel need to be made into smaller sections.
GRP Frame
Panelization
Milestone 4
The current design involves varying the glazed openings depending on the curve of the building
envelope. Different molds of GRP extrusions can be produced to vary the size of openings.
Below images show an example of a GRP façade with varying void openings on a double skin
façade.
At this stage we cannot confirm that this option would be less expensive than the existing
proposed design, but it is a viable alternative which deserves a further investigation.
The below tables summarises the potential system assembly approaches for the vessel façade.
Milestone 4
Project specific
Type Pros Cons
Remarks
Given the vessel
Site installation time
structure this system is
reduced
Fully Unitised Expensive not preferable,
unnecessary increase
Pre fabrication,
in cost.
Site installation time
Some site
reduced This would be the
Prefabricated Cassette workmanship in most
preferred approach.
cases.
Pre fabrication,
Limited capability Drainage limitations
Stick System Cheaper system given the geometry
On site workmanship. requirements.
Project specific
Material/ Finish Pros Cons
Remarks
Aluminium Anodised Luxury Finish Expensive Specified material
Preferable material
Aluminium PPC Cost Effective Reduced aesthetics
selection.
Potential GSAS issue
as the material is not
considered
environmentally
friendly.
If moulds can be Should more moulds
GFRP limited cost effective be required to achieve Given all project
solution geometry, expensive requirements, sufficient
saving may be
obtained through a
slight change from
specified material to
aluminium PPC
Milestone 4
The below table identifies potential VE opportunities that could be obtained through a reduction
in specification, the table also identifies areas that may need clarification in order to determine
any potential VE.
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Clarification on how the
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification average has been calculated
reduce the thermal
84423, U-Value to be submitted to determine
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K whether any further VE could
the IGU.
be provided.
further clarification to be
As per specification
provided on the low iron
84423, Low-iron glass Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
(but indicated as clear place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
on other Section)
potential
Many new options are
EWS-101 available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84423, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
As per specification
84423,Double
Laminated glass, Remove Ballistics Further clarification required
Inhabits current requirement to all pitch facing to Ballistics specification at
understanding of this façades. pitch facing facades
requirement is due to a
Ballistics requirement.
Treat the concourse space as
sheltered external and
replace the insulated façade
Further clarification on the
(IGU) with a SGU (single
intended concourse space
As per specification glazed) without thermally
during both tournament and
84400, U-Value broken aluminium system,
legacy made to determine the
average 1.7 W/m2K therefore treating the inner
true value of this proposed
façade line (retail / bars and
VE
restaurants) as the main
façade line with respect to
thermal performance.
EWS-102
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low-Iron Glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
Further clarification required
to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.
Milestone 4
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
As per specification
84400, Double
Laminated glass Further clarification required
Inhabits current to Ballistics specification at
understanding of this pitch facing facades
requirement is due to a
Ballistics requirement.
Further clarification to this
As per specification
value has been obtained in
84400, Sound
order to asses whether any
Insulation Rw 34dB
VE could be obtained
Integrity and Insulation or
As per specification integrity? Clarification
84400, 1-hour fire required to determine
rated whether VE could be
obtained.
Milestone 4
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
EWS-105 84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
The framing system itself
As per specification
along with the glass must
84400,For VVIP and
achieve this rating. VE
Emir levels: Ballistic
potential in implication of this
Rating Class FB 4
rating.
Further clarification required
to Ballistics specification and
As per specification how the security strategy has
84400, Blast Resistant been reached. To fully
understand the potential of
any VE at this stage.
Milestone 4
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
Many new options are
available on the market with
As per specification respect to colour and finish,
84400, Finish colour depending on the exact
anodized anodising colour PPC
alternatives could be utilised
i.e. Tiger.
Further Understanding to
As per specification
whether this is integrated into
74313, U-Value
EWS-106 EWS102 or is located at a
average 1.7 W/m2K
different façade line? I.e.
Walls
mashrabiya
Increase Spandrel area to
As per specification
reduce the thermal
84400, U-Value
performance requirements of
average 1.7 W/m2K
the IGU.
further clarification to be
provided on the low iron
As per specification Use clear / ultra clear glass in
content requirement in order
84400, Low Iron glass place of Low Iron Glass
to fully understand the VE
potential
Milestone 4
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
No Performance
requirements provided,
Specification 34900 further VE could be obtained
should this information be
specified.
Milestone 4
System
Specification Proposed VE Description Remarks
Ref
U-Value average 1.7 No thermal performance
W/m2K required at this location.
Milestone 4
17.1.1 Introduction
The original design comprises of a large circular roof with a small central opening, an option for
a retractable roof for the central opening and an inner (ceiling) liner, all understood to be
required in order to provide the correct internal environmental conditions to the bowl for the
tournament taking place during the summer.
Changing the seating geometry from a circular to an orthogonal grid permits a more efficient
seating plan which in turn allows a significant reduction in bowl size. Along with the change in
tournament timing from summer to the winter, allows the outside dimensions of the roof to be
reduced in size and the central roof opening to be bigger.
The original design of roof surface form and structure was also quite complex and opportunities
exist to simplify the arrangement.
In line with legacy requirements, the design life of the roof cladding can be reduced which allows
the material specification to be re-considered if it is decided to remove the roof as part of the
legacy option.
17.1.2.1 Loading
In the assessment of the alternative roof option, the loadings specified in Roof loading is
explained within Part D2: The Employers requirements D2.2 Schematic Design-Reports and is
shown on drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ST-RF-AZ-1100 have generally been adopted along with
typical generic load combinations.
In addition, the wind load indicated on the Roof Loading drawing C01-FOS-D-STA-T-ST-RF-
AZ-1100 based on the Wind Tunnel Study has been used in the redesign of the roof structure.
However, due to differences in the proposed geometry of the two structures, it is unlikely that
the original wind tunnel values will be the same. A further wind tunnel model will be required
which will provide more accurate values as well as giving further savings. In the absence of a
wind tunnel report based on our geometry, at least with this approach a reasonable comparison
can be obtained rather than adopting wind loading derived from the design standards, which
generally result in significantly higher wind loads.
The geometric profile of the roof surface has been modified and no longer exactly follows the
original design of “Pringle” form, although the outside eaves profile (which is what can be seen
from the outside of the stadium), does follow a similar line.
Milestone 4
The original design of membrane surface was created by a series of domes that spanned
diagonally across the roof bay. The radial lengths of the arches decreased the closer they were
located towards the central oculus. The result was a phyllotaxis type pattern to the surface.
This arrangement required both a relatively complex structural support system, (comprising of
flying struts and intersecting arch purlins) as well as complex fabric panels which varied
significantly in size.
In order to simplify the design and in the process reduce costs, OPS propose to:
Remove the lower (ceiling) membrane panel
Change the PTFE membrane to a PVC membrane
Use a series of arches purlins set out on a radial grid of equal spacing to provide a
simple and efficient structural support to the roof membrane.
There are no structural implications that would prevent the removal of the lower membrane and
removing the lower membrane would assist with access and lighting.
The change from a PTFE membrane again has limited structural implications, in practice it
should be ensured that the stresses developed within the fabric are within permissible values
for the PVC. The lower translucency of the PVC also helps reduce the heat gain within the
bowl. It should be noted however that the PVC will have a lower service life than PTFE.
The arch purlins have a rise of 15% the span in order to ensure sufficient curvature is developed
in the membrane.
Milestone 4
In addition to the self-weight and pre-stress load cases the following combinations have been
considered in the membrane analysis:
The resulting membrane stresses are close to the limit for a Type IV PVC/PE membrane under
the wind suction case and we consider that at this value, a single uplift cable would be required
in the first full bay closest to the compression ring.
The original design of roof profile took the form of a “Pringle” (Saddle). As a consequence, the
roof to the E-W stands was higher to the rear of the bowl and the roof sloped towards the pitch.
In addition to the potential drainage issues it resulted in a roof profile which could result in
greater entrapment of the external air as it flows over the roof. In addition, it would appear that
due to this geometry under uplift conditions significant movement of the inner tension ring would
need to occur in order to mobilise the uplift resistance of the radial trusses.
In the tender design the external radius of the cable net roof was 147m and the internal opening
radius 50.8m giving an approximate roof area of 59,770 m2.
Milestone 4
In the currently proposed optimised bowl design, the orthogonal seating grid adopted allows the
overall radius of the roof to be reduced to 134.68m while an enlarged opening radius of 61.2m
was adopted for the internal opening, resulting in a revised area of approximately 45,218 m 2,
giving a new cable net roof area of 76% of the original tender design.
In order to reduce costs, an alternative (simplified) roof structure has been developed which
adopts a different internal geometry (although a similar external eaves profile is created) and
avoids sloping the roof down towards the pitch and therefore resolves the potential drainage
issues the tender scheme creates.
The preliminary analysis of this geometry indicated a potential saving in steel weight of around
4,000 Tonnes on the original tender tonnage (taken from the schedules on the tender drawings),
primarily in the weight of the structural steelwork.
The main reduction in weight was obtained in the structural steel elements of the roof which
may be partially be explained by the initial analysis not including all “out of balance” load cases
and therefore it is possible that the compression ring may need to be strengthened to resist
these effects.
Milestone 4
A similar proportional reduction in weight could not be achieved for cable elements. This is
partially due to the importance that the roof geometry plays in the generating forces within the
cable (tension) elements and to the extent that a number of iterations will be required to get an
optimised efficient structure.
Option 1 represents the initially roof geometry given to Environment consultant Hilson Moran in
order to allow them to undertake the internal CFD analysis of the bowl in advance of the form
finding to the roof structure. Consequently, to ensure the roof geometry remained similar to that
used in the CFD analysis it was established that additional cable bracing would be required in
the face of the tension ring as well as high pre-tensions in order to ensure the geometry
remained similar to the form issued.
Option 2 represents a roof structure in which its geometry is allowed to change in response to
the loading and pre-stress applied. As a result, the tension ring moves up 4.5m at the lower
point and down 2.0m at the higher point, and while the pre-stress forces are lower, the
deflections are similar.
We would therefore recommend that further iterations of the roof structure are undertaken and
the profile be modified to take more account of the form finding process. This should result in
the reduction of the high pre-stress loads ensure a more efficient structure overall which would
lead to reductions in cable sizes and overall steel tonnage
An implication of this is that the revised geometry will give a “flatter” tension ring (i.e. the tension
ring is allowed to move down over the E-W stands and up over the N-S stands).
The results of the preliminary analysis under uniform loading indicated the potential saving in
steel weight could be in the region of 40% (i.e., greater than the 25% reduction in area).
The connections and castings will require further consideration in order to produce a more
accurate estimate.
Milestone 4
The Arup/Foster Tender proposals for the superstructure to the terrace stands and
accommodation areas were generally to comprise of reinforced concrete. The initial VE
proposal was for a steel-framed construction above Level 01 Concourse however in view of the
legacy scheme it may be more appropriate to adopt a steel frame structure only above level 6,
although areas of level 5 containing large open spans and cantilevers may also be better as
steel instead of concrete.
Provisional comparative tonnage calculations are summarised below, and include for floor
beams, terrace beams and supporting columns. Perimeter columns and perimeter transfer
trusses are excluded from this initial analysis and would be investigated at the next stage,
should this option be considered.
For an East / West stand frame, a provisional comparative tonnage has been calculated to be
120T per 7.5m bay.
For a North / South stand frame, a provisional comparative tonnage has been calculated to be
65T per 7.5m bay.
Additional steel is required between frames for lateral restraint, service openings, escalator
openings etc. All steelwork is generally assumed to be grade S355 and all structural steel
members will receive a paint protection system and fire protection system where deemed
necessary. This will be further detailed in the following stages.
Floor beam arrangements are required to connect to the concrete cores for lateral restraint and
to form the diaphragm action. The connections will be formed from cast-in brackets, with web
cleat connections to a steel beam around each core.
Two steel framed options are proposed for the floor construction of Level 02 and above
(although a similar approach is just as valid for a steel frame at level 6 and/or above).
A 200mm precast hollow core unit with structural screed topping of 75mm is suggested to span
the 7.5m typical spacing of the terrace grids.
Milestone 4
Precast slabs are designed to be installed without temporary propping. The precast units may
be considered to restrain the top flanges of the beams during the construction phase, though
care must be taken to load each floor beam symmetrically, and the finished slab construction
acts as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to the vertical braced bays.
Figure 17-5: Precast slab with slotted ends and studded beams for shear connection.
A 150mm composite metal deck slab can be considered as an alternative option, spanning up
to 3.0m onto secondary steel floor beams. The secondary beams are typically designed for
composite action with the in-situ metal deck floors for maximum structural performance. Primary
beams are designed as non-composite.
The direction of span of the metal deck floor is typically parallel to the primary floor beams.
Metal decks are designed to be installed without temporary propping. The profiled metal decking
is to laterally restrain the top flanges of the beams during the construction phase and the
composite slab acts as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to the vertical braced bays.
Provision of shear studs to all beams should therefore be included.
It has been considered that the maximum span of any primary floor beam should not exceed
approx. 9.0m to achieve an efficient structural design. At this stage, an 8.6m typical spacing of
columns has been adopted to cover the internal area.
Milestone 4
No heavy partitions are assumed for the VE comparison, where additional support
beams would be expected to be added to support any heavy partition line loads.
All partitions assumed to be of lightweight studwork construction and constructed to a
maximum height of 3.5m with a timber diaphragm lid over.
Additional steel around concrete cores for floor connections not accounted for.
Double structure at movement joints not accounted for.
The beam layout follows a similar format to the precast floor option above, with precast terrace
units placed onto a raking steel beam.
Plan bracing will be required at regular intervals to transfer the lateral loads down to the floor
diaphragms.
Figure 17-7: Indicative West stand (left) and North stand (right) steel frames
Milestone 4
The support for the cantilever section is primarily governed by the crowd induced dynamic
criteria, where the client requires capacity for a scenario 4 event (i.e. a high energy concert with
periods of high intensity music with crowd behaviour classed as excited, mostly standing and
bobbing with some jumping). The resulting solution is to provide a fabricated plate section to
stiffen the cantilever section and meet the 6Hz natural frequency criteria required. The dynamic
response will be further confirmed in the next stages.
Simple connections are generally adequate, with approximately 25% of frame connections
required to be full moment connections to achieve the dynamic criteria.
It is noted that the acceptance criteria for crowd induced dynamics should be discussed at an
early stage to ascertain whether a lower scenario can be accepted. The structural frame, for
example, is less likely to be governed by the scenario 2 event criteria (i.e. classical concerts
and typically well attended sporting events with the audience seated with only a few exceptions
resulting with minor excitation).
17.2.3.1 Grids
The framing of the terrace bowl and accommodation structure will follow the orthogonal grids
set out by the architects. This orthogonal grid system results in a regular arrangement of the
frame, with the framing of the lower tiers repeated for the full bowl.
The framing of the roof and façade structures follow a radial grid system which has been
proposed to provide symmetry in the elevations and to provide the most efficient roof geometry.
The original design has separate supporting structures for the roof and façade, and the bowl
structure. To incorporate the supporting structures for bowl, roof and façade, it is proposed that
the primary beams of the terraces and primary beams of the floor structure may be vertically
Milestone 4
supported at the perimeter by 24 primary columns, which are similar in position to the original
design.
The outward sloping geometry of the stadium bowl dictates that the supporting columns of the
lower tiers are short, whilst the supporting columns of the upper tiers are tall and placed close
to the stadium perimeter. It has been assumed that terrace support columns may be placed
between the circulation cores, but not beyond.
The short columns are effectively restrained by each floor slab, whilst the upper tier columns
are tall and not restrained at all levels. The solution will be to restrain the columns laterally with
additional beam sections, however adding additional steel to the overall scheme. A detailed
review in the next stages will determine which of the columns would require the additional
restraint – dependant on column loading.
It is considered that the concourse floor arrangements will be further developed at the next
stage, and therefore column positions may be reviewed at the next stage to fit to the internal
room layouts (where possible) and to highlight any spaces which may require column-free areas
and therefore the addition of transfer structures.
Figure 17-9: Indicative column layout on the orthogonal grid – West stand plan with critical column positions
(marked in red) and suggested column positions (marked in blue).
48 roof support columns are positioned around the stadium perimeter, whilst only 24 columns
have been assumed to continue to ground level via plinths. A transfer truss is therefore required
Milestone 4
to support the intermediate columns and transfer the loads to the columns directly supported on
the plinths.
The lateral component of the inclined column force will be resisted by connections at Level 03
to the floor system.
Figure 17-10: Elevation of primary column layout with additional intermediate columns for roof support,
transfer truss below Level 05 and perimeter transfer beams at all other levels.
The alignment and position of the primary perimeter columns, to provide an aesthetic similar to
the original design, dictates that part of the Upper Concourse levels are constructed beyond the
line of the primary support and therefore cantilever beyond.
For the larger East and West stands, where floors exist at Levels 07 and 08, it may be possible
for the primary floor beams to cantilever to support the floors, subject to a detailed review of the
floor dynamics.
For Level 06 of the East and West stands, and Level 05 generally, it will be necessary to provide
additional support to the cantilevering slab. This may be provided by a secondary truss on the
primary floor beam lines, or by introducing column hangers on the 7.5 degree grids to connect
at high level.
If the perimeter floor areas could be reduced, with a view to having say a 2m cantilever beyond
the cantilever at each floor level, this would provide a simplification to the structure and provide
a saving, but note that further design work is required by the architect in the future stages to
review the floor areas.
Milestone 4
Figure 17-11: Typical column layout – West stand section with critical column positions (marked in red) and
suggested column positions (marked in blue).
Precast terrace units, vomitory walls, balcony units and associated side panels and step blocks
are to be designed and detailed by the precast concrete sub-contractor. Below are typical details
which are applicable to the design.
17.2.7.1 Terraces
The grandstand terraces are to be formed from precast concrete terrace units spanning
between structural steel raker beams. The precast terraces units are supported on a steel stool
welded to the raking steel beam, and connected by locating a dowel within a pre-drilled pocket
in the terrace unit, and grouted with non-shrink grout.
The terrace units transfer vertical and horizontal loads to the steel raker beams. The precast
units are not assumed to provide restraint to the raker beams nor do they act as a diaphragm
or as ties.
Milestone 4
17.2.7.2 Vomitories
Lower level vomitory walls will be formed from precast concrete and sit directly on to the ground
beams with resin anchors post drilled into the ground beams corresponding with dowel holes in
the vomitory units. The anchors are to be grouted with non-shrink grout immediately after
installation of the vomitory walls.
Upper level vomitory walls will be formed from precast concrete and sit directly on to supporting
beams at floor level with steel dowels pre-welded to the supporting beam and corresponding to
dowel holes in the precast vomitory. The anchors are to be grouted with non-shrink grout
immediately after installation of the vomitory walls.
Precast terrace units adjacent vomitory walls are supported on steel angle sections fixed to the
side of the vomitory walls.
Milestone 4
At the front of the cantilever terrace section a ‘U’ shaped precast unit forms the front of the
balcony including the front barrier.
The rear rows of lower sections of precast terrace units may provide support to the metal deck
floor slab behind. Steel angles may be fixed to the rear of the precast units to provide support
to the metal decking.
Milestone 4
Figure 17-17: Precast terrace unit support to metal deck slabs (or alternatively reinforced concrete slabs),
where necessary onto the rear of precast terrace units.
The existing design is one of the most complex and costly arrangements to fabricate.
The Vessel structure is formed of a double layer diagrid Vierendeel that is set out to a curved
geometry in two directions. The double layer diagrid is then stiffened by diagonal "ribs” that
follow the same spacing and reflect the alignment of the roof support columns behind. Lattice
truss steel floor structures extend out to the external vessel in a number of locations.
The vessel geometry creates a very large space between the back of the stands and the
external façade. This was considered to be an expensive arrangement that could be value
engineered without compromising the functionality of the stadium.
Milestone 4
Figure 17-18: Extract from original design drawing showing the Cladding support arrangement
Milestone 4
The "rib is a fin-like structure 2.5m deep and 0.6m wide, fabricated from a number of plates cut
and curved and then welded together to form a section with a very high architectural content.
There are two methods typically used to form this shape as indicated below.
Milestone 4
We have created such sections in the past and they have always proved to be very costly to
form, requiring many more fabrication hours to create a smooth section. Our proposal is to avoid
this approach and provide an open tubular steel arrangement instead, please see VE option
section shown in figure 17.24 below.
The dual layer diagrid structure creates very complex connections with between 6 and 9
intersecting members at a node. This can be avoided with a revised structural arrangement.
We anticipate that the structure will largely be fabricated off-site and transported large sections.
If the fabrication shop is in Qatar we would expect sections up to 25m long and 5m wide to be
transported by road. Subject to the Qatar highways limitations.
If the steel work is fabricated overseas, we find that the maximum length transported is reduced
to only 16-18m in length such that the pieces will fit into a standard shipping container.
Due to the rib lengths, we expect that there will be 3 site splices (1 at each end and 1 in the
middle). If there is sufficient layout space and programme time it is advantageous to site weld
the fin sections together.
This will reduce the fabrication shop hours (cutting and welding) as well as reducing the amount
of steelwork in the project.
Milestone 4
Figure 17-22: Extract from Arup drawings showing the two typical splice details
These joints are indicated as flange plate connections with many plates and a high fabrication
content.
Milestone 4
Figure 17-23: Extract from Arup drawings showing enlarged splice detail between two sections of ‘rib’
We have found in the past that these are not the most structurally efficient. Our intention would
be to reduce the complexity of these connections using fishplate connections instead.
For the typical CHS to CHS splice connection, a simplified exposed flange plate detail can be
adopted.
Milestone 4
We have highlighted above that the Arup/Foster scheme is complex with a high percentage of
hidden steel connections which are costly to form. Given that the stadium is to have a short life,
we question the justification of this expense.
In London for the 2012 Olympic Games the short life buildings were designed to a reduced
specification for the minimum requirements, with the simplest and efficient connection details
and a reduced corrosion protection system.
I. Greatly simplify the connections to the CHS sections with exposed "pipe- flange"
connections.
III. Site weld as many connections as possible, but as a minimum the highly loaded
connections. Temporary bolted connections can be used to assist erection alignment,
prior to welding.
Milestone 4
In this option we have based our statements on the assumption that the new arrangement is to
look exactly like the original design, and is therefore a "scaled-down" version of the original
design.
17.3.4.1 VE Opportunity 1
As noted in the façade report, reducing the external diameter of the Vessel has reduced the
area of the facade by 9666 m2 that is an approximate 20% reduction in area.
This has given a number of benefits;
i. Reducing the length of each of the members in elevation and therefore proportionally
reducing the steel tonnage
ii. Reduced weight of cladding to be supported.
iii. Reduced structural spans, leading to lower bending moments and axial loads.
The complexity in the geometry is exactly the same, with the same curvature and angle of
inclination.
Milestone 4
There are the same number of members to be cut, welded and connected as the original design.
The Structural Analysis of the scaled down original design has not been undertaken since it
would retain much of the complexity which adds coat and therefore may not have a significant
cost saving much above the 20% reduction in area.
17.3.4.2 VE Opportunity 2
In reducing the vessel area has brought the external façade closer to the floor structures, this
gives the opportunity for an alternative secondary support structure, as discussed below.
The consequence of the above savings is that we have a strut and tie arrangement to transfer
the external tertiary diagrid forces to the nearest floor and columns.
Milestone 4
17.3.4.3 VE Opportunity 3
In the process of reducing the roof and the façade dimensions, it has been possible to move the
main support columns inwards towards the pitch. This has enabled the roof support columns to
be combined with the floor structure, as indicated below.
We are proposing there be two column types, the Main Columns set out every 15° around the
bowl (7.5° off of the orthogonal N/S/E/W gridlines) with intermediate columns equally spaced
between them.
Milestone 4
The intermediate columns will be supported on a 2D truss situated beneath Level 05. This truss
will carry not only the façade load through the column, but also the roof loading and Level 05
floor slab load. These columns will be inclined in section, but straight in elevation.
Milestone 4
In order to reduce the complexity, we have considered a single layer diagrid system to support
the external façade cladding. We envisage this will be constructed from standard sized rolled
steel hollow sections.
The diagrid will be supported by a series of inclined columns which also support the roof.
Milestone 4
The external diagrid is connected to the main columns on each of the 7.5° roof columns. Vertical
load is transferred to these by a series of V-struts. The location of these forms a truss like
arrangement that spreads the wind load into the stand structures where they are available. This
arrangement can accommodate the ever changing heights, spans and floor arrangements
around the bowl whilst maintaining efficiency.
During the next stage of the design it should be possible to achieve further savings to the façade
by optimizing the geometry of external vessel with the intention of creating additional repetition
and standardisation to the panels and supporting structure.
Milestone 4
The section above indicates the relative positioning of the vessel geometry, the stands, floor
plates and roof structure.
The revised structural arrangement has reduced the diagrid structure by one complete layer
without having to increase the remaining diagrid member sizes (508 diameters throughout).
The V-Strut transfer elements are also 500mm deep in the current model.
The main columns have been reduced from fabricated tubes up to 2000mm in diameter to
813mm CHS.
These are all advantages, the only disadvantage with this current arrangement is that the
intermediate roof column has to be supported by a long span truss between primary columns.
A further cost saving option would be to take the intermediate columns directly down to ground,
removing the need for a truss at Level 05.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
A preliminary comparative study of the relative approximate steelwork weights for the Tender
Design and the VE proposals has been undertaken in order to assess the likely comparative
savings that might be generated by the VE proposals.
Although due to the differences in the basic form of the façade it is difficult to make a direct
comparison between elements of the structure it can be seen that a significant saving is
achieved in the Primary Structure, (i.e. the inclined V column), while a lesser saving is achieved
in the Façade Structure itself, which is probably more representative of the reduction in façade
area. The increase in weight of the elements describe as Wind Girders appears to be as a
result in the change of structural form of the façade supporting structure and as a tonnage
represents a relatively minor increase over the original design.
The result is an indicative saving in the region of 50% on the steel weight of the Tender Proposal
in addition to any efficiencies created in what could be in some areas a simpler design.
Milestone 4
18.1 Introduction
This section is an appraisal of the VE options from a crowd movement perspective. The aims
of the analysis undertaken were as follows:
Prove that the architectural VE changes are suitable for crowd movement for both
internal and external areas of the stadium
Improve the design to increase amenity of spectators travelling to/from the stadium
Mitigate the identified shortcomings in the existing design
Use case studies from FIFA compliant stadia to aid the design process
Consider requirements for legacy use
Crowd Dynamics International have worked alongside the project team to analyse the VE
options and help to shape the design in a way that optimises spectator’s movement while
maintaining the core value engineering principles proposed.
The main change affecting crowd movement is that the stadium footprint has been reduced,
and raised out of the groundwater. The impact of this is shown at concourse level below:
Milestone 4
This allowed for large reduction in costs, but in turn, meant that there are a number of areas
related to crowd movement that needed to be addressed:
Raising the stadium has meant more vertical circulation is required to move spectators
from precinct level to main concourse level
Shrinking the stadium footprint means that more space is available, providing the
opportunity to optimise external crowd movement
Internal spaces must remain compliant with the relevant codes, regarding evacuation,
internal circulation both horizontal and vertical
18.1.1 Methodology
Crowd movement has been assessed on the basis of the Stage 1 report assumptions, criteria
for design and design guidance. The revised VE options have been analysed as far as possible
using static and dynamic analysis as appropriate.
The external areas of the stadium have been designed to green guide standards, allowing
appropriate space for spectator’s movement, and optimising the placement of vertical
circulation. They have been analysed using static analysis to determine requisite design widths
for crowd flow, and have been tested using a newly constructed dynamic simulation model to
highlight the gained operational efficiency in comparison to the Foster’s design.
The internal areas have been designed to maintain the GFA of internal concourse space and
the same vertical circulation cores as the fosters design. The current VE proposal has not
specified stair widths and specific vomitory widths and so the analysis has shown that the design
is flexible enough to accommodate the 80,000 capacity.
Milestone 4
The net capacity of the stadium will be 80,000 spectators, excluding VIP/VVIP guest. VIP/VVIP
have segregated routes from the other spectators, which require only 2-3m of circulation width
in total, which will be provided and hence are discounted from further calculation.
The main vertical circulation for GA/hospitality spectators is via stair cores, provided in the same
number as the original Foster’s design. The stairs have not been sized due to the changing
nature of the VE exercise, but the footprints are flexible enough to accommodate the
requirements, with flexible internal circulation in the internal concourses.
The diagram below highlights the proposed VE design vertical circulation elements around the
stadium, highlighted in light blue around the perimeter of the stadium footprint.
Milestone 4
The diagrams below show the distributed and flexible spectator movements through the various
stadium levels. They highlight the flexibility in design and options for spectator movement,
meaning that vertical circulation requirements can be accommodated within the proposal.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The design requires further development to fully specify adequate widths for each stair core,
although provision has been made to allow such stair width to be available under the FIFA 5th
Edition technical guidance. The same applies to concourse spaces and other provisions for
spectators within the VE design option.
Therefore, the provision and flexibility has been made in the design to allow for crowd movement
internally to the stadium. In future design, crowd modelling will be used to optimise the and fully
design the movement spaces.
Milestone 4
The original design has certain issues pertaining to crowd movement that were documented in
stage 1 of this VE exercise. The additional space afforded by reduction in stadium footprint has
meant some of these issues can be mitigated through the external design.
The following general principles have been applied to the external design, considering the
requirements for crowd movement specified at stage 1:
Maintain all previously proposed security and admission principles for Mag and Bag,
turnstiles and secure perimeter FIFA requirements.
Utilise additional space provided by shrinking stadium footprint at concourse level
Utilise additional space at precinct level if required
Consider case studies of FIFA compliant stadia to further VE solutions for crowds
Construct and analyse manageable options for crowds navigating new vertical height
difference of +5.0m between precinct and concourse level
Use static and dynamic models as appropriate to test external concourse options
The following assumptions have been made to create a manageable space, which match or
exceed previous guidelines specified at stage 1. They have been chosen to enable efficient
crowd movement and will allow flexible crowd management options for normal and emergency
modes during ingress and egress.
Approximate distribution of crowds across stadium stands assuming N/S/E/W stands
each split into two sections
Fruin Level of service C on podium
Fruin Level of service D on vertical circulation (VC)
40% of GA spectators leave in 5 minutes
72% of all spectators head east towards bus/car parking
28% of all spectators head south towards metro/transport hub
The following case studies show FIFA compliant stadia with stairs, including Premier League
Stadia, National Stadia and venues from previous world cup tournaments.
The case studies demonstrate how changes in level external to the stadia have been designed.
Milestone 4
A combination of stairs and ramps is used to negotiate level changes up to the stadium external
concourse, as shown below.
Milestone 4
Mainly stairs are used to negotiate to the pitch level concourse, with further stair external to the
stadium, allowing vertical circulation after turnstiles to a higher level.
Milestone 4
18.3.2.3 South Africa 2010 – Soccer City Stadium, Johannesburg (94,736 Capacity)
The main stadium for the 2010 world cup had a level change external to the stadium similar to
the proposed Lusail VE option, higher in some places. Multiple stairs around the stadium
allowed sufficient crowd circulation within FIFA’s parameters and when finished do not detract
from the external façade on approach.
Milestone 4
The Swedish National Stadium was designed and constructed with constraints similar to the
Lusail location, with two sides of the stadium inaccessible. A Solution using combined ramps
and stairs was found to enable access to the concourse entry level, as pictured below. The level
change was greater than the VE proposal for Lusail, but stairs and ramps were viable options.
Milestone 4
Home to Arsenal FC, the ground is accessed by wide stairs to one side and ramps to the other.
The use of head of stair barriers made from concrete, are in keeping with the surrounds, not
requiring the standard metal barriers. Such a technique could be applied with different materials
at lusail, if stairs are a viable option.
Milestone 4
The above case studies have served to show that level changes can be approached in a number
of different ways. The proposed VE option that lifts the stadium saves value, but similar
approaches to the above must be taken. It is worth noting that none of the above have solely
ramp options for such heights, where space is not available to create such ramps. Furthermore,
whilst ramps can provide access to wheelchairs, longer ramps are not ideal for the mobility
impaired and therefore, elevator access is still a requirement. Stairs often provide the shortest
route and allow a more dispersed ingress and egress for crowds, where ramps take a lot more
space and lengthen the journey.
Many iterations of options have been designed to satisfy the requirements for crowd movement,
with consideration to FIFA guidelines and SC guidelines, whilst providing the best value option
that allows some of the previous problems to be reduced or solved entirely. There are two main
options as follows:
Option 1: Ramps and stairs
Option 2: 1:50 precinct slope with shorter ramps to concourse level at 1:50
Option 2 is split into option 2a with 5 ramps to the south and east, and option 2b with 6 ramps
around the concourse level.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The following sections highlight the analysis undertaken and the advantages and disadvantages
of the components of each option and the designs as a whole.
As highlighted in the stage 1 analysis, ramps approached with large U-turn movements are not
optimal, being used at uneven densities and are potentially unsafe unless sufficient turning
space is allowed for. Stairs positioned in the direction of flow or perpendicular to the concourse
mitigate this issue, but require design as per the Green Guide/FIFA 5th editions.
Where U-turn movements are likely to enter a ramp, the following design has been proposed,
assuming a 20m width. The circular approach to the top of the ramp allows more space for
crowds to turn more gradually onto the ramp, improving efficiency.
Ramps have been designed at a 1:21 slope to meet accessibility criteria, with consistent entry
and exit widths.
This option was tested using dynamic simulation to highlight the acceptable crowd movement.
It has been assumed that crowds are managed to use the spaces as evenly as possible. This
could take the form of stewarding, barriers, signage etc.
The diagram below shows the use of space in the model, especially highlighting that a split at
the bottom of the ramp for those spectators heading south and those heading east would be
acceptable at a level of service D
Milestone 4
The mean density plot below highlights the generally evenly used space, showing the design
would work effectively with crowd management in place. It is noted that due to reliance on crowd
management to evenly distribute crowds, this is not ideal, and movements should approach at
least from both sides of a ramp or limiting turning movements to 90degrees where possible.
Cumulative Mean Density Plot for U-turn movements on proposed ramp design
The stairs are to be designed to meet FIFA guidelines, with reference to the Green Guide. The
following designs are proposed for 9m wide and 12m wide stairs up a level difference +4.95m,
where any minor difference in level should be accommodated with a gentle ramp of slope less
than 1:40, rather than a smaller or larger step. Central handrails are required and head of stairs
barriers to deflect forward pressure on the stairs have been dimensioned as per guidance. As
noted form the case studies, these can be made in any material that can withstand the relevant
force, and can therefore become part of the landscape design.
Milestone 4
The option combines both ramps and stairs, as seen in many of the case studies. This is seen
as the best value option from a construction perspective and also the most distributed crowd
movement. It allows allows full flexibility for further design stages in terms of crowd movement
as the stair positions can be moved, resized easily and even extended to different heights.
Because there are only 2 ramps, they can also be repositioned as required through more
detailed design stages. This is the preferred option from a crowd movement perspective, but
uses external stairs that do not exist in the original design.
Dynamic modelling was undertaken on this preferred option to show how the stairs work and
how ramps without the above design function with no U-Turn movement.
It has been assumed that the exit from the stadium is evenly distributed between the 24 possible
exit points. A relatively even distribution is likely in any final design given the symmetrical nature
of the VE internal layout, even if each stair core does not take precisely the same number of
people. All previously stated assumptions apply. The simulation was run for a period of 20
minutes, with the peak 10 minute flow exiting the stadium (80% of GA spectators in 10 mins) to
represent the peak period for crowd flow.
The diagram below shows snapshots from the model through the run, with a cumulative mean
density map, highlighting the acceptable density within the design, and acceptable use of
ramps.
All spectators in the simulation are coloured according to their exit point, which is either the
bottom of the different stairs, or the bottom of the two ramps.
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
The snapshots show a consistency in crowding through the model, with the cumulative mean
density showing many less issues than the original design. The requirements for crowd
management are less than the original, and are softer measures such as signage and
wayfinding and verbal instructions on direction.
The cumulative maximum density over the whole simulation shows that the maximum density
each space experienced is within acceptable and expected boundaries.
Overall, the design and individual VC elements have been shown to function well in Option 1
through dynamic simulation.
Milestone 4
18.3.6 Option 2
Both option 2a and 2b are assessed using static assessment, given that the dynamic simulation
has shown the proposed element design to function acceptably, providing acceptable crowd
management is in place for ramps.
Both options contain only ramps, which is not considered ideal. Option 2b is an optimisation of
2a from a crowd movement perspective.
18.3.6.1 2a
The diagram below shows option 2a, highlighting the ramps and locations where external widths
were calculated using static formula based on level of service. To reduce cross movements in
this option, it was assumed that all spectators must circulate at concourse level to separate
those heading south and those heading east so that a reduction in cross flow is obtained at
precinct level.
The table below shows the relevant widths for each area, at a level of service C for concourse
level and level of service D for the ramps. This allows sufficient space for the necessary
circulation at concourse level.
Milestone 4
The minimum widths are provided in the design. It is noted that in any design optimisation, areas
C and F should be considered in more detail to provide additional space near to the ramp areas.
All ramps should be designed to the specification above because they do have large u-turn
movements.
The design meets the specified parameters, but will require active crowd management to
distribute crowds to the correct ramps, and careful monitoring of the external areas to prevent
and mitigate build-up of crowd densities.
Emergency provision to the North West would still be required as per the original proposals.
Milestone 4
18.3.6.2 2b
The diagram below shows option 2b, highlighting the ramps and locations where external widths
were calculated using static formula based on level of service. The distribution of crowds exiting
the concourse is of benefit to crowd management and natural crowd movement, meaning softer
crowd management would be required in this option than option 2a. The number of u-turn
movements is also reduced. Cross flow at precinct level is reduced from the original concept
and more distributed than option 2a assuming no management at concourse level.
The table below shows the relevant widths for each area, at a level of service C for concourse
level and level of service D for the ramps. This allows sufficient space for the necessary
circulation at concourse level.
Milestone 4
The ramp widths can be optimised, and it is recommended that they are kept consistent at the
maximum required. Consideration can also be given to removing the northern emergency
egress route, when widening the 6 ramps in this design.
Concourse widths are more than sufficient, allowing for landscaping options or further VE
reduction in future design by minimising widths, at a time when internal movement is better
developed.
18.4 Conclusions
The stadium has been assessed internally from a high level perspective to show that the design
has enough flexibility to cater for vertical circulation of spectators and required vomitory widths
for each GA, hospitality and VIP/VVIP spectators.
The external landscaping of the VE proposal has made use of the additional space and
mitigated the level change from precinct to concourse level within 3 options that have been
analysed. Stair and ramp designs have been proposed based on fifth edition guidance to be
used in the design. Option 1 with stairs and ramps, and options 2a and 2b with only ramps were
analysed dynamically and statically as appropriate to measure their applicability to guidelines.
Crowd management was considered at a high level through the modelling, analysis and design,
with emergency egress provision in-line with standards previously laid out in stage 1 and original
design documentation.
Further design iterations and crowd modelling would be required to match the internal exits with
sufficient vertical circulation externally and crowd management strategy being developed,
especially considering emergency provision.
Milestone 4
We have reviewed the Legacy mode requirements based on Document D2.5 in the RFP, our
feedback on the various disciplines are the following:
19.1 Architecture:
Based on Supreme committee requirements that “The memory of the 2022 FIFA World Cup
Qatar shall be retained”, therefore, the façade and roof structural shall be retained where
conversion for the Legacy Mode will be adopted internally.
All floors will be retained; partitions will be replaced with the new drywall partitions, meeting the
new design for the new multi-use community venue. The four facilities in this venue (Leasable
office area, Medical Clinic and Wellness Spa, residential accommodation, elementary school)
will occupy 6 floors (Plaza first level, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth levels.
Pitch level (level 0) will be converted to parking and MEP spaces. The new facilities will be
required certain number of parking spaces to comply with Municipality requirements, where the
MEP spaces shown in tournament mode will be used for Legacy mode. MEP part below will be
detailed covering all systems. The plant room and parking areas are excluded from the total
legacy areas (80,000m2).
The parking will be accessed thru the existing ramp per the tournament mode design. Additional
ramp might be required after TIS model is carried out for the legacy mode.
Please refer to floor plans below depicting the required zoning for each facility in each floor.
The cores 9stairs and elevator) in Tournament mode will be used in Legacy mode. Additional
stairs and elevators might be required to serve the new facility and comply with the Life safety
code and QCD. The Void between the vessel and internal floor slabs will be used as atrium
space, ventilated, where the various facilities can overlook this space. Internal garden can be
created indoors.
The tiers will be removed except for the lower tier that will be retained to access the pitch level.
External walls will be added to enclose the new spaces for the various facilities.
The pitch will remain open to sky, will be converted to surface parking, landscape and open
playground and park that will be used for the residential and school. The pitch level (converted
to surface parking and playground) will be access for car thru the parking floor. Fire truck shall
have access to the pitch area.
19.2 Structural:
For the tournament mode there are 8 levels of floor structure with 3 levels of tiers for the seating.
For the proposed legacy mode only up to level 6 will be retained. Therefore, it is proposed to
have the conventional cast in place Reinforced Concrete (RC) structure up to level 6 and steel
structure with either precast hollow core slab or steel decking composite slab will be adopted.
With the proposal of steel structure above level 7 it will be easily demountable during the legacy
stage. The fixing of the proposed steel columns above the RC columns will be by bolts. All the
steel to steel connections will also be by bolts so that it can be easily demountable and reusable
in the future.
The raking beam for supporting the precast seating structure in the tiers will also be proposed
as steel structure so that it can be removed in the future easily. Similarly, all the tier structures
are kept as precast structures which is also demountable.
Milestone 4
The loadings such as the super imposed dead loads including the allowance of partition loads
and live loads will be allowed correctly keeping in consideration of the legacy use so that the
base structure can be retained after the tournament mode.
The roof structure is also proposed to retain during the legacy mode. Only concern for the roof
is to make sure the PVC roofing material proposed has to be maintained or replaced after its
life period which will be smaller compare to the normal design life period of 50 years.
a- HVAC:
b- Fire protection
c- Plumbing
d- Electrical:
e- Security
f- AV and Telecom
h- Landscape
19.3.1 Potable Cold Water System - Retain and Reuse with additional water meters
The existing tournament mode potable cold water system supplies water to wash basins,
ablution taps, sinks, showers, dishwashers, etc. in the building.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School with some required modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the
legacy mode plan layout requirement.
The new apartment and office buildings in the legacy mode will be requiring additonal water
meters in the potable water distribution lines feeding every unit of the apartment and offices as
illustrated below for water metering purposes.
Milestone 4
19.3.2 Non-Potable Cold Water System - Retain and Reuse with additional water meters
The existing tournament mode non-potable cold water system supplies water to water closets,
urinals, bib taps, etc. in the building.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School with some required modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the
legacy mode plan layout requirement.
The new apartment and office buildings in the legacy mode will be requiring additonal water
meters in the non-potable water distribution lines feeding every unit of the apartment and offices
as illustrated below for water metering purposes.
The existing tournament mode TSE water supply system is used for WC and urinal flushing,
pitch irrigation, suitable wash down facilities (e.g. bib taps) and supply of irrigation water to
external landscaping (part of Infra scope of work).
It can be retained and reused if required for non-potable use and external landscaping in the
legacy mode.
The existing tournament mode hot water system consists of local point - of - use direct electric
generation or local hot water storage calorifiers with associated local secondary return
circulation systems.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve Clinics and School with some required
modifications in the pipe line distribution to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.
In the apartment and offices buildings, dedicated or localized water heaters will be added in the
installations as indicatively shown below.
Milestone 4
The existing tournament mode chilled cold water system supplies water to selected end users
within the stadium. The provision of chilled water shall be through local generation of chilled
water via plate heat exchanger (PHX), chilled water storage vessel (semi-storage type) and
secondary return circulation pumping system.
It can be retained and reused only to serve the clinic building where chilled cold water system
is required per code. Some line distributions will be modified to suite the legacy mode plan
layout requirement for the clinic building.
The existing tournament mode water storage system consists of bulk potable & non-potable
water tanks and pitch irrigation water tank which are generally of concrete construction (See
illustration below). The exception to this being for the dedicated potable & non-potable tanks
serving the Emir suite, condensate collection tanks and roof cleaning tanks which are made of
sectional pre-insulated GRP panel construction.
Milestone 4
These storage tanks can be retained and reused for legacy mode complex to serve the
individual building offices, clinics, apartments and school with estimated potable and non-
potable demand as tabulated below.
Sewer
Number of Potable Water (Human/Primate
Item SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Waste)
Occupants Demand(L/P)
No. Area (m2)
per IBC
Daily Daily
Peak(LPM) Peak(LPM)
Flow(LPD) Flow(LPD)
668,830 535,064
m3
POTABLE WATER(60%) 800
m3
NON-POTABLE WATER(40%) 538
Milestone 4
In case of different owners/renters for the legacy mode Office, School, Apartment and Clinics,
each building will be having a dedicated/separated water storage tank and booster pump sets
to supply water to the building.
The existing tournament mode booster pump system consists of packaged multi-stage pump
type units, each to include multi-stage inverter controlled quiet running variable speed pumps
(minimum duty, support & standby), inlet & outlet manifold headers, integral control panel &
isolator, accumulator vessel(s) & associated isolation valves, outlet pressure controls, low level
cut-out switches, flexible connections/anti-vibration mounts all mounted on a common skid base
frame.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics,
Apartments and School.
In case of different owners/renters for the legacy mode Office, School, Apartment and Clinics,
each building will be having a dedicated/separated booster pump sets to supply water to the
building.
19.3.8 Pitch Irrigation System – Retain and Reuse for Future Landscaping
The existing tournament mode pitch irrigation water system is used for pitch irrigation water
system, supply of water to hose bibs for cleaning purposes and external landscaping
Milestone 4
The existing tournament mode for building drainage system can be retained and reused for
legacy mode to serve the individual building Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School with some
required modifications in the drainage layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement
as described below.
Core main drainage risers 3 to 9 to receive discharges from the Apartment building.
Core main drainage risers 10 to 13 to receive discharges from the Clinic building.
Core main drainage risers 14 to 22 to receive discharges from the Offices building.
Core main drainage risers 23 & 24 and 1 & 2 to receive discharges from the School
building.
The existing tournament mode grey water system can be retained and reused for legacy mode
for the supply of water to water closets, urinals, etc.in Offices, Apartments and School buildings
with some required modifications in the layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.
Clinics will be fed by potable water system from the existing potable water storage tank via
existing booster pumping units.
The existing tournament mode condensate recycling system consists 10 sets of satellite
condensate tanks (6 m3 each) with dedicated booster pump sets, water treatment system and
pipe works. This recycled water is used for pitch irrigation and flushing of WCs and urinals.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode for the supply of water to water closets, urinals,
etc. in Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School buildings with some required modifications in the
layout to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.
The existing tournament mode rain water drainage/collection system can be retained.
The existing tournament mode roof cleaning system consists of local break tanks and
associated pump sets which serve numbers of hose reel points within each quadrant at roof
level. These are supplied from the non-potable water system.
It can be retained and reused for legacy mode for the supply of water for non-potable use.
The existing tournament mode for the leak detection system will be retained and reused with
some modifications to be made in the layout to suite the legacy layout plan.
The existing tournament mode for the metering and sub-metering system will be retained with
some modifications to be made in distributions/locations to suite the legacy layout plan.
Apartment and office buildings will be requiring additional meters for the water supply line of
each apartment unit.
Milestone 4
19.3.16 Sanitary Area Shut Off Valve System - Retain and Reuse
The existing tournament mode for the sanitary area shut off valve system will be retained with
some modifications to be made in distribution to suite the legacy layout plan.
The existing tournament mode for internal pipework installations will be retained with some
modifications in the distribution to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.
The existing tournament mode for building management system will be retained with some
modifications in the system to suite the legacy mode plan layout requirement.
The legacy mode buildings (school, offices, clinics and apartments) are classified according to
NFPA Code 101, 13 and 14, as light hazard.
Sprinkler head coverage area: 12m2
Sprinkler max. area of operation: 232m2
Sprinkler sys. design density:
Light Hazard: 0.1 U.S gpm/sq ft. (4.1 L/min/m2)
Sprinkler sys. duration of operation is 60 minutes.
Minimum residual pressure at the most remote sprinkler: 15 Psi (1 bar)
Sprinkler system maximum area covered per control station: 4800m2 per floor.
Residual pressure for landing valves and fire hydrants is 7bars ≤ P ≤ 12 bars
Hydraulically designed Standpipes and Automatic sprinkler systems shall be designed
to provide the required minimum water flow and residual pressure at the most remote
area.
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION
School Light Hazard Occupancy
Offices Light Hazard Occupancy
Clinics Light Hazard Occupancy
Apartments Light Hazard Occupancy
All fire suppression systems described below are subject to the approval by Civil Defense
Department or authorities having jurisdiction.
Milestone 4
the fire suppression systems, such as external fire hydrants, sprinkler and fire hose reel
/ wet riser.
Fire pump set will contain jockey pump to maintain the pressure in the fire systems at
all times.
Quadruple fire brigade breeching inlets shall be provided at the boundary walls of the
complex to allow the fire department fire truck to supplement the fire protection water
reserve supply.
Pressure reducing stations shall be introduced where the pressure exceeds the
allowable limits.
Alarm check valve with water gongs will be provided for each building (school, offices,
clinics and apartments)
VE mode:
The fire pumps for VE mode will be used for the legacy mode since the height of the building
do not change. But new alarm checks valves and water gongs will be required for each building.
If the four buildings are owned by different clients then 4 sets of fire pumps will be required, one
for each building (school, offices, clinics and apartments).
One-hour raw water demand for fire systems at ground level is required per NFPA and QCD
requirements.
VE mode:
In the VE design, it is recommended to design the storage fire water tank for 1 hour instead of
2 hours.
Conclusion:
The fire water tanks for VE mode can be for used the legacy mode complex since the
height of the buildings do not change.
If the four buildings (school, offices, clinics and apartments) are owned by different
clients then fire water tank will be required, one for each building.
Milestone 4
VE mode:
Separate, wet risers installed in the stairwells will be required to serve the new sprinkler system
and 65mm landing valves for each building.
VE mode:
Wet risers have been designed for VE mode since the staircases are the same.
Conclusion:
The wet risers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for each
building.
Indoor fire hose-reel stations shall be installed in the offices, school, clinics and apartments in
compliance with NFPA 14 code and QCD requirements. Each indoor fire hose reel station
should be equipped with:
Red lacquered steel cabinet.
25 mm, 30 mm long hose – reel
6kg portable fire extinguisher- rating Class- C
9 litter pressure water fire extinguisher- rating class- A
VE mode:
Hose reel system and fire extinguishers have been provided in the VE mode.
Conclusion:
Hose reel system and fire extinguishers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition
as required for each building.
Milestone 4
Portable fire extinguishers will be provided for each building the complex.
VE mode:
Fire extinguishers can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for each
building.
Clean agent systems shall be provided to protect the communication, UPS, ELV and computer
server rooms located in all buildings (offices, school, clinics and apartments).
VE mode:
Clean agent system has been in VE mode design.
Conclusion:
Clean agent system can be reused with modification, alteration and addition as required for
each building.
Milestone 4
No change
In Legacy mode, the football stadium will be transformed into a multi-use community venue.
(school, clinics, office & apartment) The project in base build mode will have built-in features
that do not add cost to the project that facilitate conversion to Legacy Use.
The cooling load capacity are calculated approximately, based on the new architectural
information for the new legacy facilities which include the following:
North stand – School - 14903.0 M2
South stand – Clinics - 17188.0 M2
West stand – Offices - 25819.0 M2
East stand – Apartments - 25912.0 M2
The cooling load calculation as indicated on the ARUP report document no TDO-16-TTC-0018
shows 50.0 MV, based on the summer condition for legacy mode operation. The considered
outside air condition is dry bulb temperature = 36.8 Degree C and Wet bulb temperature = 33.4
Degree C.
For the new legacy mode, the cooling load (20.5MW) are calculated based on the summer
condition as detailed below:
The cooling load for the school is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(14903.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 4.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy school, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section)
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode North Stand – School
The legacy mode north stand school will be provided with 20 Nos. Air handling units, 200 Nos
fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.
All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.
Milestone 4
The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to north
stand school zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the north stand school zone.
Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.
The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.
The cooling load for the clinics is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(17188.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 4.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy clinics, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section).
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode South Stand – Clinics
The legacy mode south stand clinics will be provided with 20 Nos. Air handling units, 200 Nos
fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.
All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.
The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to south
stand clinics zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the south stand clinics zone.
Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.
The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.
The cooling load for the office is calculated based on the summer condition and also new areas
(25819.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 6.0 MW approximately for the new
legacy office, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling load
calculation data sheet is attached in the below section).
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode West Stand – office
The legacy mode west stand office will be provided with 30 Nos. Air handling units, 300 Nos fan
coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.
All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.
The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to west
stand office zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the west stand office zone.
Milestone 4
Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.
The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.
The cooling load for the apartment is calculated based on the summer condition and also new
areas (25912.0 M2). The total cooling load capacity is calculated 6.0 MW approximately for the
new legacy apartment, which includes the fresh air cooling load etc. (Refer to the details cooling
load calculation data sheet is attached in the below section)
HVAC Equipment Requirements for Legacy Mode East Stand – Apartment
The legacy mode east stand apartment will be provided with 30 Nos. Air handling units, 300
Nos fan coil units and 4 Nos. treated fresh air handling units.
All the fan coil units and air handling will be re-used from the different zones of tournament
mode.
The four numbers treated outside air handling units will be re-located from the level 4 to east
stand apartment zone to provide treated outside air ventilation for the east stand apartment
zone.
Chilled water branching piping will be re-routed along with controls vales etc. to suit the new fan
coils units and air handling located within the facilities.
The stairwell and smoke stop lobbies pressurization fan units for the core areas will remain to
facilitate the new legacy mode operation.
Based on the new legacy mode, the cooling load capacity are calculated approximately 20.5
MW, which is 60 % percentage lower than the original design. (50.0 MW)
19.5.8 The following HVAC equipment are available from the tournament mode:
Plate heat exchangers
The available PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment from the tournament mode is sized for
60.0 MW cooling capacity. (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent of 4 Nos. duty + 1 No.
standby).
The available chilled water pump from the tournament mode is sized for 60.0 MW cooling
capacity. (2 sets 30.0 MW, each sets consistent of 8 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby).
Total 300 Nos. of air handling unit are available from the tournament mode as follows:
AHU's for Field of Play (FOP) = 10 Nos.
Milestone 4
More than 1500 Nos. fan coil units are available from the tournament mode.
Based on the new legacy facilities the following HVAC equipment will be re-used from the
tournament mode:
The PHEX (Plate heat exchanger) equipment will be sized 20.5 MW cooling capacity, based on
the new legacy facilities. To achieve the cooling capacity of 20.5 MW, by deleting the additional
plates to suit the new flow rates and temperature difference of plate heat exchangers. (1 set of
20.0 MW, consistent of 3 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby)
Chilled water pumps will be sized 20.5 MW based on the new legacy facilities. To achieve the
cooling capacity of 20.5 MW, the inverter speed controller will be re-adjusted to suit the new
flow rates of chilled water pumps. (1 sets 20.5 MW, consistent of 3 Nos. duty + 1 No. standby).
Total 100 Nos. of air handling unit will be re-used from the tournament mode, the following
number are required based on the new legacy mode for different facilities:
AHU's for north stand school is 20 Nos.
AHU’s for south stand clinics is 20 Nos.
AHU’s for west stand office is 30 Nos.
AHU’s for east stand apartment is 30 Nos.
Total 100 Nos. of air handling unit will be re-used from the tournament mode, the following
number are required based on the new legacy mode for different facilities:
FCU's for north stand school is 200 Nos.
FCU’s for south stand clinics is 200 Nos.
FCU’s for west stand office is 300 Nos.
FCU’s for east stand apartment is 300 Nos.
A VE opportunity on all the HVAC duct and duct accessories, Pipe and Pipe accessories etc. to
retained, reused and additional for the new legacy mode facilities
Conclusion: Based on the proposed cooling load capacity 20.5MW for the new legacy mode
facilities, the tournament cooling system will be re-used for the new legacy mode. NO
ADDITIONAL COOLING NEEDED FOR THE NEW LEGACY MODE (Refer to the details
cooling load calculation data sheet in Appendix A-16)
Milestone 4
19.6 Electrical
In the legacy mode, the power demand requirements to each facility will be updated and
distributed from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:
Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode
Total
Total power Total power
Legacy area Demand Demand
Area VA/m2 Demand Connected
requirements Factor standby
Load (KVA) Load KVA)
Load (KVA)
East Stand.
Apartments total 18920 100 1892.00 0.7 2702.86 567.60
area (Substation3)
North Stand. School
total 21691 110 2386.01 0.8 2982.51 715.80
area(Substation4)
TOTAL 80524 8668.44 11331.51 2600.53
The electrical distribution system will be provided for the different categories of electrical
demands throughout the legacy mode.
The design of legacy mode infrastructure will provide services to individual facilities i.e Offices,
Clinics, Apartments and School. Each building will be served by a dedicated 11kV / 415 Volts
tournament mode substation.
In the VE design, the power demand requirements for tournament mode of the stadium will be
as per the following:
The total power demand load is 15500 KVA
The total power connected load is 20357.08 KVA.
The total power demand standby Load is 3100 KVA.
Conclusion, the power demand load for Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential
far exceeds the requirements of the legacy mode requirements and hence it will be retained.
In the legacy mode, the estimated total power demand load is 8668.44 KVA and the estimated
total connected load is 11331.51 KVA.
Milestone 4
The Tournament mode four substations will be retained and reused for legacy mode facilities
i.e., Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School.
The Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential MV panels will be retained.
However, The Tournament Essential back up MV panels will be removed.
In the VE design, the power demand requirements for the stadium will be as per the following:
The total power demand load is 15500 KVA
The total power connected load is 20357.08 KVA.
Conclusion, MV panels for the Tournament Essential back up will be eliminated and the space
for these MV rooms can be reutilized for other purposes.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated medium voltage power
supply and installation approval.
In the legacy mode, one main KAHRAMAA KWH meter will be provided at the low voltage side
in clinic and school buildings respectively.
Office building will have Electrical Tenant energy metering according to the number of tenants
on each floor in addition to landlord meters
Apartment building will have Electrical Tenant energy metering according to the number of
apartments in addition to landlord meters
In the VE design, The Low Voltage (LV) switchboards will be equipped with integral KAHRAMAA
meters for the Tournament mode.
Conclusion, Additional Tenant meters will be provided to suit the legacy mode and KAHRAMAA
requirements.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the additional Tenant meters approval.
19.6.4 Transformers
In the legacy mode, the power demand requirements to each facility will updated and distributed
from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:
Milestone 4
Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode
Total
Legacy area power No of Total Demand
No of Generators
requirements Demand Transformers standby Load
Load
East Stand.
Apartments total 1892.00 2.00 ( 1600KVA) 567.60 1 set (750KVA)
area (Substation3)
Transformer equipment sizes are generally based on 1600KVA, with allowance of 20% spare
capacity.
The transformers located in the tournament mode four substations will be retained and reused
for legacy mode.
In the VE design, number of transformers for the tournament mode in the four substations as
shown below:
Milestone 4
Conclusion, in legacy mode each substation will have two transformers instead of four.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated transformer loads and
installation approval.
In the legacy mode, the standby power demand requirements for each facility will be updated
and distributed from the four tournament mode substations as shown below:
Preliminary breakdown for the electrical load assessment for Legacy Mode
East Stand.
2.00 (
Apartments total 1892.00 567.60 1 set (750KVA)
1600KVA)
area (Substation3)
Each building will reuse the LV generators located in the tournament mode generator rooms.
Emergency standby generator will supply the following loads for each building in case of loss of
normal power supply.
Life support system – smoke extract fans, stair pressurization fans & etc.
Pumps – fire, water, sump & sewage lift
Selected elevators and fire lift
Emergency / egress lighting, Exit illumination, exit signs, step lights
Fire Alarm System
Selected lighting for the building, essential plant areas, BMS & Security Room and
telecommunications equipment rooms.
Selected PC’s
Data equipment of the Telecommunication system
Milestone 4
In the VE design, there are LV generators (life safety) for the tournament mode in four
substations distributed as shown below:
Total Total
power Total power Demand No of
VE area Demand No of
Demand Connected standby Generators
requirements Factor Transformers
Load Load (KVA) Load (Life safety)
(KVA) (KVA)
1 set
Substation1 4183.648 0.8 5229.56 4 (1600KVA) 836.73
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation2 3862.507 0.75 5150.01 4 (1600KVA) 772.50
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation3 3697.16 0.7 5281.66 4 (1600KVA) 739.43
(1000KVA)
1 set
Substation4 3756.685 0.8 4695.86 4 (1600KVA) 751.34
(1000KVA)
TOTAL 15500.00 20357.08 3100.00
Conclusion- The tournament mode LV generators (life safety) serve the tournament Non-
Essential and Tournament – Essential. These generators will be retained and readjusted to
suite legacy mode plan layout.
In the legacy mode, each building will reuse the Main/Sub Main Distribution Board (MDB/SMDB
- 415/240V), located in the tournament main low voltage room.
Each building floor will reuse the electrical room to accommodate Bus Duct/ cables riser, floor
Distribution Board (DB) and distribution boards for landlord services.
Additional new DB’s serving the apartments/offices loads will be located within each
apartments/offices for tenant uses. The Power to these DB's will be distributed from the floor
MDB's, via cables.
In the VE design, the low voltage distribution for the Tournament Non- Essential, Tournament
Essential and the Tournament Essential back up is serving the four tournament mode
substations.
Conclusion, in legacy mode each substation will have two number of Low voltage panels instead
of four.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated low voltage panels loads
and installation approval.
Milestone 4
In the legacy mode, each building will reuse the Power factor correction located in the
tournament mode four substations.
In the VE design, the power factor correction equipment Tournament Non- Essential,
Tournament Essential and the Tournament Essential back up is serving the four tournament
mode substations.
Conclusion, The Tournament Non- Essential and Tournament Essential power factor correction
equipment will be retained. However, the Tournament Essential back up power factor correction
equipment will be removed.
In legacy mode each substation will have two number of power factor correction capacitor banks
instead of four.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated power factor correction
and installation approval.
In the legacy mode, the four tournament mode substations will be retained and reused to serve
the individual Offices, Clinics, Apartments and School building.
Each building will reuse the busbars /cables equipment located in the tournament mode main
low voltage rooms and the 8 electrical services risers will be retained.
The tournament mode multicore armoured cables / busbars will be retained and readjusted to
suite legacy mode, which will be served from the LV panels located in the four tournament mode
substations and connected to MDBs located in each building (selection according to voltage
drop calculations).
The tournament mode wiring will be reused. However, any additional wiring will be concealed
within ceiling voids or cast-in conduits within walls, in all areas except closets and mechanical
spaces where they can be run exposed.
In the VE design, the stadium has 8 electrical service risers severing all electrical systems
Conclusion, the service risers within the tournament mode will be reused to serve the legacy
mode loads with adjustment to suit.
Local electricity authority (Kahramaa) will be revisited for the updated busbars /cables and
installation approval.
In the legacy mode, the Uninterruptible Power Supplies provided in tournament mode will be
reused and will be used to supply power to the following systems:
Milestone 4
Battery backup time of UPS for item 1 to 3 above will be 5 minutes as used in tournament mode
since all the UPS will be fed from generator supply. 60 minutes’ backup time will be provided
for Security, CCTV & Access control System as per MOI requirements same as in tournament
mode.
In the VE design, the tournament mode Uninterrupted power supply (UPS) is provided for Field
of play lighting, Emir Suite, VOC and Main communication room (PTA).
Conclusion- UPS for Field of play lighting, Emir Suite, VOC will not be required in Legacy mode.
These UPS and batteries will be reconfigured and reused as per Legacy mode requirements.
In the legacy mode, the grounding system serving the stadium will be retained and reused.
The tournament mode earthing system located at each substation will be retained.
The tournament mode clean and functional earthing system located in each communications
room, incoming telecom room, ELV rooms will be retained.
In the VE design, main MV and LV earth bars will be included in each substation and will be
wall mounted in an accessible location. The clean and functional earthing system will be
included for bonding selected equipment and systems to a clean network in each
communications room, incoming telecom room, plant rooms and where required.
Conclusion, The tournament mode grounding system serving the stadium will be retained for
legacy mode.
In the legacy mode, the lightning protection system serving the stadium will be retained.
In the VE design, using Non-Conventional lightning protection system instead of the current
conventional lightning protection system is proposed.
Conclusion, the tournament mode lightning protection system serving the stadium will be
retained and reused for legacy mode.
In the legacy mode, the cable carrying systems serving the stadium will be retained and reused
for legacy mode. However, additional cable carrying system will be added to suite the new
requirements for each building
The tournament mode Containment system, HDGI cable ladders / cable trays will be reused
where required to suite the new requirements for each building
In the VE design, the cable carrying systems (containment) include cable trays, cable trunking
and cable baskets in the ceiling voids. The cable tray size will be designed to accommodate the
cables run in them.
Milestone 4
Conclusion, the tournament mode Containment system will be retained and reused where
required to suite the new requirements for each building.
In the legacy mode, the small power and wiring devices serving the stadium will be retained and
reused. However, additional small power and wiring devices will be added to suite the new
requirements for each building.
All apartment, offices, school, clinic and public areas will utilize small power and wiring
accessory plates to suite architecture / interior design requirements.
In the VE design, the general power system include the general purpose switched socket
outlets, socket outlets, fused connection units and power, isolators of ancillary systems
optimized to suit arch. / Interior design requirements.
Conclusion, the tournament mode small power and wiring devices serving the stadium will be
retained and reused for legacy mode. However, additional small power and wiring devices will
be added to suite the new requirements for each building.
In legacy mode design, external feature lighting will be required since exterior façade will be
retained.
The lighting of the exterior and interior of the vessel for the Tournament mode will be retained
as it is. The upper tier will be removed in legacy mode and hence Roof graze lighting will be
removed.
Conclusion - Lighting of the exterior and interior of the vessel will be reused.
In legacy mode design, interior lighting will be required as per Legacy layout and space
planning.
The interior lighting for the Tournament mode will be retained as far a possible if it suits the
Legacy space requirement.
Conclusion - The lighting will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
The Field of play lighting and stadium lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.
Pitch grow lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
Legacy mode the house lighting will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
Milestone 4
In Legacy design mode, Separate lighting control system will be required for each development.
The Lighting control system for the Tournament mode will be reused.
Conclusion - The lighting control system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Lighting control system will be removed for Field of play area and for areas that are removed in
legacy mode.
In Legacy design mode, independent Emergency Lighting system will be required for each
development.
The Emergency Lighting system for the Tournament mode will be reused. System design as 4
risers in tournament mode and can be reused for legacy mode development.
Conclusion - The Emergency Lighting system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan
layout.
Conclusion - Since the façade will be retained, the Obstacle lighting will be retained as it is.
In legacy mode design, 8 FACPs will be required. Each development (School, apartment, clinic
and office) will be provided with 2 FACPs. All 8 FACPs will be networked and will be served by
common Fire Command center.
Tournament mode has 8 FACPs and all the Fire Alarm & Detection System for the Tournament
mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.
In legacy mode design, each development (School, apartment, clinic and office) will be provided
with an independent EVAC system.
Tournament mode has 4 separate risers for Emergency Voice Alarm communication.
Tournament mode EVAC system will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Voice Alarm in Spectator areas will be removed.
Conclusion - EVAC devices will be reused and readjusted as per new layouts.
Milestone 4
Public address / Sport entertainment system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.
Concert support system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
The Emergency Telephone (Intercom) system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be
removed.
Tournament mode has 4 separate risers for Fire telephone. This Fire Telephone system in
tournament mode will be retained.
This system will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
The Disabled Persons Alarm system will be retained and reused / readjusted as per new
layouts.
The Referee Call System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
In legacy mode design, 2 ICT rooms per floor will be required in each development (School,
apartment, clinic and office).
ICT system will be retained from tournament mode. 2 ICT rooms per floor in each zone are
available in tournament mode. Rooms will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout if
required. ICT areas related to MOI, External Mobile/Radio Equipment Spaces, and Central
Apparatus Room for Broadcast will be removed.
Milestone 4
Structured Cabling System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy
mode plan layout. There will be addition of data outlets as per Legacy mode requirement.
Conclusion - The SCS system need to be added as per Legacy mode layouts and tournament
mode outlets will be reused and readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
WLAN System for the Tournament mode has 4 nos WLAN risers and will be retained and reused
to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Conclusion - The WLAN system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
Data Network System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy
mode plan layout.
Conclusion - The data network system in the tournament mode will be reconfigured into 4
networks and readjusted to suite legacy mode.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode plan layout.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
19.9.8 Spectator Electronic Access Control System (SEAC)
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
Milestone 4
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
Moziac system will be required for Residential areas. New risers will be provided as per
Residential unit layouts.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
19.10.3 Offices
This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.
Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.
Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
This System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.
Conclusion - The system will be readjusted to suite legacy mode plan layout.
This System will not be required in Legacy mode and will be removed.
19.11 BMS
The System for the Tournament mode will be retained and reused to suite legacy mode
requirements.
Milestone 4
19.12 CCTV
In legacy mode design, each facility (School, Office, Clinic and Residential) will be required with
CCTV coverages and each facility have different requirements. 4 nos CCTV System risers and
network equipment’s with a common monitoring facility will be required.
In tournament mode, the CCTV provision (i.e. 10%R Detect, 25%R Observe, 50%R Recognise,
120%R Identify) is provided as per Emiri Decree No.9. There is extensive CCTV coverage of
the facility in tournament mode.
Conclusion - CCTV System for the Tournament mode will be sufficient for Legacy mode
requirements. CCTV installation in stadium bowl will not be required and can be reused in other
areas. System needs to be reconfigured and reused to suite legacy mode requirement. The
CCTV locations will need to be modified to suite the legacy mode plan layouts. Central
monitoring location in Tournament mode can be reused.
In legacy mode design, each facility (School, Office, Clinic and Residential) will be required with
access control system and each facility have specific requirement. 4 nos ACS System network
and equipment’s will be required.
In tournament mode, electronic and mechanical access control systems are provided.
Conclusion - ACS System for the Tournament mode will be sufficient for Legacy mode
requirements. System needs to be reconfigured and reused to suite legacy mode requirement.
The ACS locations will need to be modified to suite the legacy mode plan layouts.
19.14 Infrastructure
Document D2.1, Section 2, mentions of Legacy mode requirements:
The proposed infrastructure plans do not impact D3 Road, except for running a 5m utilities
corridor along it right of way. Permanency of D3 Road is not impacted in terms of design or
construction. Permanency of LRT rail alignment is also not impacted by the Infrastructures.
Below is extract from TIS Report showing the alignment. There might be some utilities crossing
the LRT route, however, will not impact upon their design or construction.
Milestone 4
Following issues have been considered in Infrastructures VE exercise in complying with the
Legacy mode requirements:
Two particular utilities cross into precinct – Foul Sewer and Electrical. All other utilities either tie
into utilities supply from D3 Road or are self-contained within the project site. The extract below
on the left shows the existing road and proposed road as part of D3 Road (note the bell mouths
along the road suggesting road through the Precinct).
As can be compared with the utilities corridor drawing on the right, both the Foul sewer and the
electrical routing consider the future roads that branch from D3 Road.
Milestone 4
The utilities connections made to the stadium will cater for the demand or outflows identified in
the stadium, both for tournament stage and Legacy stage.
The pipe sizes and cable capacities will account during detailed design for any additional
capacities required during Legacy mode.
At this stage, the Electric power supply has been provided with twice the number of ducts (100%
for redundancy and additional 100% surplus capacity for future) i.e. where 4 nos. MV cables
Milestone 4
are proposed, additional 8 nos. ducts are provided. This is likely going to suffice for Legacy
Mode.
For foul sewer line crossing the precinct, the size may have to be re-evaluated based on
information from LREDC whether any future lines are going to outfall into this pipe. However,
current 500mm provision seems to be reasonable based on engineering judgement.
Stormwater provision and Roads layout in the Precinct are proposed to be temporary and so
have no impact on the Legacy mode.
The proposed infrastructure plans or the utilities connections, do not cross the proposed Theatre
District based on the VE proposed. In Schematic Design an 1100mm pipe was crossing the
district. However, under the VE design, all the stormwater is proposed to be contained by a
“Wadi necklace” in the Stadium project area. The stormwater design plans and road layouts in
the area are beyond the D&B scope. However, they are proposed to be temporary and so have
no impact under Legacy Mode.
Based on the above discussions, it can be inferred that the infrastructure plans proposed will
have no impact on to the Legacy mode requirements.
The Foul Sewer outfall is in A3 Road and it connects road bell mouths of D3 Road and A3 Road.
This is consistent with Schematic Design.
Milestone 4
20.1 Introduction
Tricon has been requested by Graham Simpson of KEO to provide commentary on the design
proposals for a modified scheme design for Lusail stadium which would form the basis of AFL’s
submission as part of a part D&B tender team under a contractor based in Asia. The notes
below summarise our input to date, as given is a tele-conference with Graham Simpson on 28
July 2016.
Tricon was a part of the original design team on the scheme with Foster + Partners. Significant
changes since that scheme are:
A reduction in capacity.
No requirement for Legacy. The stadium will be designed to meet Tournament only.
The stadium is to be just FIFA compliant. There is some ambiguity over the extent of SC
compliance that may be sought, on which we have commented.
20.2 SC Standards
The designs were developed originally to comply with SC-APW-SOC-AAA-STD-00002 inter alia
but were then progressed in the light of value engineering, responses to RFI’s and the
November 2015 issuing of SC-ACV-CAFQSC-STD-00005 affecting the planning of concessions
in particular.
20.2.1 SC-APW-SOC-AAA-STD-00002
20.2.2 SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005
Milestone 4
20.3 Concessions
The provision of concessions and mobile POS had been determined from an amalgam of three
slightly conflicting sources:
FIFA 5
SC standards under SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005
SC crowd modelling standards under SC-C06-CAB-TRN-TQP-POP-16-00017
The planning of the concessions had been based on 1 fixed POS per 250 GA’s and 1.5m per
POS, thus it was FIFA and SC-ACV-CAF-QSC-STD-00005 compliant. The more recent issue
of Crowd Movement Standards, document SC-C06-CAB-TRN-TQP-POP-16-00017, sets also
a target for 40% of the GA’s to be served at halftime.
This was met by increasing the provision of mobile POS and hawkers.
The Main Kitchen exists primarily to support the hospitality requirements of the stadium as the
food sold in the concessions will be prepared largely from part-prepared product bought-in
ready-to-cook and serve or some simply to serve. The Main Kitchen prepares the hospitality
requirements from raw ingredients and sends the finished or part-finished dishes to the finishing
kitchens local to the hospitality areas. Dishes may be prepared in advance and held chilled.
However, such part-prepared or fully-prepared dishes could be provided also by an external
commissary kitchen located in the Precinct.
The Main Kitchen was originally planned as a permanent element on account of the Legacy
proposals. The stadium being designed only to meet the requirements of Tournament means
now that it will be used some eight times and there is no Legacy driving an ongoing requirement.
This could allow the Main Kitchen to be offsite by locating it in the adjacent Precinct and using
a temporary kitchen structure such as those provided by the likes of PKL for the Olympics.
The greatest benefit is derived if the Main kitchen is in the Precinct with direct connection to the
stadium either via a grade level link or by underground tunnel. Such connection allows trolleys
to be moved into the stadium without vehicular loading/ unloading and it allows all raw goods
Milestone 4
entering the Main Kitchen and stores to be security checked without a need for a further check
on movement into the stadium. The impact on areas would be:
MAIN AREA SUB-AREA ONSITE MAIN SUPPLY VIA AN
KITCHEN OFFSITE
COMMISSARY
Level B1 Loading Dock
Bulk Beverage Stores Removed offsite
Dry Goods and Disposable Stores (reduced)
Staff Changing Removed offsite
Preparation areas in Main Kitchen Deleted
Hot and Cold Kitchens Deleted
Portioning Area Removed subject
to distance
Holding of prepared dishes
Dishwashing
Utensil Washing Deleted
Offices Removed offsite
All Levels Finishing Kitchens
20.4.2 Areas
The following table shows the extent of areas required in the stadium if the kitchen were reduced
or removed to a remote location, both with a connection or without.
DESCRIPTION EXISTING REDUCED CONNECTED UNCONNECTED
(M2) (M2) REMOTE REMOTE
(M2) (M2)
Food Storage 115 80 0 0
Beverage Storage 45 45 45 45
Preparation, Hot Kitchen, 565 500 0 0
Cold Kitchen and Portioning
Cold Holding 145 125 30 125
Dish Wash, Trolley Wash, 210 180 0 0
Trolley Park and Ice
Production
Equipment Store 35 0 0 0
Pots Wash 70 60 0 0
TOTAL 1,185 990 75 170
The original design of the stadium had already been designed utilizing the smallest support
areas possible on each of the hospitality areas and was supported with direct connection to the
basement support to minimize holding and allowing replenishment throughout an event. The
design also had a central ware wash (unless specifically requested otherwise) to allow for a
delayed wash up process that could continue once the event had finished.
We have recalculated the support facilities required in addition to the Main Kitchen and Stores
Areas.
Below is a table showing the existing proposed calculation for BOH areas broken down into
each of the different hospitality areas. We have then calculated the revised BOH support areas
to reflect the reduced and identified this in the table that follows. We have assumed the strategy
previously set out would continue for the new design. This leads to a reduction in area from
1,025m² to 760m².
Milestone 4
VIP Lounge Plaza 1,977 1,318 988 Northern 117 Regen and remote wash up
VIP Lounge VIP 844 562 422 Northern 58 Regen and remote wash up
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 296
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
TOTAL 160
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 297
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Northwest L01 N/A 1,087 Northwest 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge
Southeast L01 N/A 1,631 Southeast 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge
Southwest L01 N/A 1,087 Southwest 70 Glass wash and Storage only
Club Lounge
VIP Lounge L02 1,939 1,350 Northern 100 Regen and remote wash up
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 298
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
TOTAL 160
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 299
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Hospitality L02 N/A 5,000 Northeast 70 Glass wash and storage only
TOTAL 160
Milestone 4
Validate Value Engineering Options
Page 300
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
20.8 CONCESSIONS
Based on the latest numbers for GA’s, we estimate the required numbers of POS for
concessions, mobiles and hawkers to meet FIFA to be:
LEVEL Capacity FIFA
Concession Mobile Stands Hawker Total
Base Build POS based on Temporary Additional Total of both
1/250 POS based on hawker
1/1000 based on
1/600
POS POS POS POS
0 0 0 0 0
Level 07 13,375 54 14 23 91
From our experience the uplift to meet crowd modelling standards may be around 10% to the
mobiles/hawkers.
We suggest that:
All of the concessions with food might be re-heat only so that ducted kitchen extract is
not required apart from the number required to satisfy the requirement of McDonald’s.
However, if the latter went into the Precinct, similar to the restaurant at London 2012,
even that might be avoided.
At least 1/3rd of concessions might be beverage only as such a ratio has been accepted
by the SC on other stadia.
Milestone 4
21.1 Topic
Text…..
21.1.1 Subtopic
Text…..
21.2 Topic
Text…..
21.2.1 Subtopic
Text…..
21.2.1.1 Subtopic
Text….
Bullet
o Sub-bullet
Milestone 4
22 Appendices
00-XX-DR-A-20301 Sections
Milestone 4
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Broadcast areas
Ceremonies
FIFA/LOC offices
Media_Ancillary
Media_FIFA New Media Areas
Media_Mixed Zone
Media_Press Conference Room
Medical facilities/Doping control_Ancillary
Medical facilities/Doping control_Players'
Medical Room
Parking Facilities
Plant
Playing area/Dressing room_Ancillary
Playing area/Dressing room_Indoor warm up
area & Dressing room & Showers and toilets
facilities
Security Services_Ancillary
Security Services_Stewards' Holding Area
Service compounds
Service road/Service tunnel
Stadium signage and decor_Ancillary
Stadium signage and decor_Signage Storage
Vertical Circulation
VVIP/VIP
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-0, Pitch
GIA: 37658 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-00-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Hospitality_Lounges
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation
VVIP/VIP
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-1, Concourse
GIA: 15171 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-01-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Hospitality_Ancillary
Hospitality_Lounges
Plant
Vertical Circulation
VIP_Ancillary
VIP_Lounge
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-2, Hospitality
GIA :14608 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-02-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Hospitality_Ancillary
Hospitality_Skyboxes & Suites
Media
Plant
Security Services
Vertical Circulation
VVIP_Ancillary
VVIP_Lounges
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-3, Skyboxes VVIP
GIA:11698 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn AS checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-03-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Floor
Plant
Vertical Circulation
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-4, Plant
GIA: 5912 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-04-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Media
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-5, Upper Concourse 1
GIA: 17581 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-05-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SEATING SCHEDULE
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
Type AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
LOWER TIER original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
GA - CONCOURSE LOWER TIER
26768
HOSPITALITY ITEM ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
5118 Gross Seating Capacity 91,271 N/A
SKY BOXES Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to team N/A 0
2212 benches/seating areas
VIP Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to N/A 1118
advertising board
1350
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the camera location N/A 102
VVIP
154 Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the media stand N/A 6182
8004 Seat kills / seats with a view obstruction on any stand due to handrails, N/A Unknown until
sector segregation fences, structural elements, etc. detail design
55264
Any other seat kills due to the facilities or constructions obstructing the N/A 1849
Grand total: 90866 view.
+ 405 disabled TOTAL NUMBER OF REDUCTIONS 11,271
Gross seating capacity total: 91,271 GROSS SEATING CAPACITY MINUS TOTAL OF SEATS REMOVED 80,000
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
STAGE 4 P2
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-05-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-6, Upper Concourse 2
GIA: 6951 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-06-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Plant
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
Vertical Circulation
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-7, Upper Concourse 3
GIA: 4216 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MK checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-07-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
By Department Legend
Plant
Vertical Circulation
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-8, Plant
GIA :4216 m2
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn MR checked MR
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
0 10 m 50m 100m STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-08-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
General Arrangement,
Level-9, Overall Bowl
161519-AFL- 00-09-DR-A-20101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
SEATING SCHEDULE AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
Type AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
LOWER TIER
GA - CONCOURSE LOWER TIER
26768
HOSPITALITY ITEM ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
VIP Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction in the lower tier due to N/A 1118
advertising board
1350 Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the camera location N/A 102
VVIP
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the media stand N/A 6182
154
35602 VIP / VVIP N/A 1500
Seat kills - seats with a view obstruction due to the ceremonies N/A 0
platform
UPPER TIER Seat kills due to the view obstruction that spectators in these seats N/A Presentation
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 5 would cause to the TV presentation studios/VOC (i.e. affected views studios: 260,
from the TV studios and Venue Operations Centre) VOC:260
32508 Total: 520
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 6 Seat kills due to the construction of temporary access paths that have N/A Unknown until
14752 to be established to allow for an additional spectator flow into certain detail design
regions of the seating area.
GA - CONCOURSE LEVEL 7
Seat kills / seats with a view obstruction on any stand due to handrails, N/A Unknown until
8004 sector segregation fences, structural elements, etc. detail design
55264
Any other seat kills due to the facilities or constructions obstructing the N/A 1849
Grand total: 90866 view.
+ 405 disabled TOTAL NUMBER OF REDUCTIONS 11,271
Gross seating capacity total: 91,271 GROSS SEATING CAPACITY MINUS TOTAL OF SEATS REMOVED 80,000
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
STAGE 4 P2
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-09-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
R48 R01 R02
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
R47 Any descrepancies are to be reported to the Architect before any work
R03 commences
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
R44 R06 AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
R43 R07
R42 R08
R41 R09
R40 R10
R39 R11
R38 R12
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
R36 R14 Employer
R35 R15
client
R34 R16
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
R32 R18
R31 R19
drawing title
R29 R21
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT
161519 1 : 600 rev date 12.08.16
R28 R22 dwg purpose status rev
STAGE 4 P1
R27 R23 bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
Stadium Bowl - 3d View From Lower Tier Stadium Bowl - 3d View from the Upper Tier
1 2
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
Stadium Bowl - 3d View from VVIP Stadium Bowl - 3d View from the Pitch
3 4
AFL job number scale @ A1 drawn TZ checked NT
161519 rev date 12.08.16
dwg purpose status rev
P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-XX-DR-A-20601
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
Key:
Line denotes boundary of the
190 metres 'reccommended
view range' line
rev rev
description
00
00
00
project
00
19
Lusail Stadium
19
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
w: www.afl-architects.com
Percentage of seats Percentage of seats e: mail@afl-uk.com
beyond the 190m line: 12% beyond the 190m line: 5% twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
Information P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-ZZ-DR-A-72101
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
client
AFL Architects
1st Floor
St Georges House
56 Peter Street
Manchester UK
M2 3NQ
w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
drawing title
Information P1
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-ZZ-DR-A-72102
© 2015 AFL ARCHITECTS [v1.6]
NOTES
All dimensions and levels to be checked on site
DISCLAIMER
When this drawing is issued in CAD, it is an uncontrolled version issued
for information only, to enable the recipient to prepare their own
documents/drawings for which they are solely responsible.
SOFTWARE INTEROPERABILITY
AFL prepared this drawing using Autodesk REVIT Architecture.
AFL does not accept liability for any loss or degradation of any
information held in the drawing resulting from the translation from the
original file format to any other file format or from the recipients reading
of it in any other programme.
Departments Key:
Ceremonies
Players dressing rooms
Hospitality
Lounges
62.319 m Media
Back of Bowl_S-N Services
Spectators concourse
Spectators ancillary
VVIP
49.121 m
Back of Bowl_E-W
44.121 m
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3
39.121 m
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
34.122 m
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
29.121 m
Level 4 - PLANT
24.121 m
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP
19.121 m
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY
13.121 m
Level 1 - CONCOURSE LOWER
6.000 m
Level 0 - Pitch
rev rev
description
no. date rev by
project
Lusail Stadium
location
Qatar, Doha
Employer
62.319 m
Back of Bowl_S-N
client
49.121 m
Back of Bowl_E-W
KEO International Consultants
44.121 m
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3
39.121 m
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
34.122 m
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
29.121 m
Level 4 - PLANT AFL Architects
24.121 m 1st Floor
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP St Georges House
56 Peter Street
19.121 m Manchester UK
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY M2 3NQ
6.000 m w: www.afl-architects.com
e: mail@afl-uk.com
Level 0 - Pitch
twitter.com/AFLArchitects
key plan
E-W Section
drawing title
Sections
STAGE 4 P5
bim project origin zone level type role 5-digit no.
161519-AFL- 00-XX-DR-A-20301
(S) Stadium 2021 2022 2023
(P) Precint Base build Tournament Legacy
Stadium Precinct
Nº Space Notes
Temporary / Permanent
Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Area Lusail Stadium Tender
Required Min. Area m2 Required Min. Area m2 SC Requirement Area m2 Scheme
when SC uplift m2 Scheme Area m2
Area m2
1.00 Stadium
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
1.30 Parking Facilities P
Total 3490 0 0 149765 0 22955
1.31 Security Services P/S
Total 3691 0 25148 9120 0 32
Auxiliary venues
Non FIFA Department Rooms S
Total 58434 0 125255 0 0 0
Total
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
1.01 Vehicle search areas TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th P P TBD 8.1.3 Must allow for efficient security clearance during arrival times.
1.03 Turnstiles–General Spectators 146 N/A 3m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP IP P 438 All spectators to pass through security/turnstiles.
1.03 Turnstiles–Suite/VIP/VVIP Spectators 4 N/A 6m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP IP P 23 All spectators to pass through security/turnstiles. 1 turnstile per 400 guests. Separate entrances/turnstiles should be provided for each tier.
Spectator Plaza, close to Inner
1.04 Ticket clearing points 2 2 4 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th IP P 8 72 5.4.2 not specified Important to note that these are ticketing clearing points (help desks) as opposed to a ticketing office. Adjacent to main stadium entrance.
Perimeter (Precinct)
1.05 Staff entry points TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th IP P TBD not specified Adjacent to spectator turnstiles and mag & bags
2 Spectator Areas
2.01 Commercial display–commercial affiliates, FIFA and host city 15-20 TBD 4000-5500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th IP 4000 Located on main spectator access routes from security screening area to stadium entrances.
2.02 ATM (public) 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th IP TBD not specified not specified
Wheelchair Companions Lower Tier 322 included in above area FIFA 5th FIFA SB LT inc. above see detailed
Wheelchair Companions Upper Tier front 80 included in above area FIFA 5th FIFA SB UT inc. above see detailed
Spectator Medical Centre Lower Concourse TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP SB/IP 01 60 67 see detailed
Spectator Medical Centre Upper Concourse 1 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP SB/IP 05 60 67 see detailed
Concourse 27079
WC’s–Female spectators Lower Concourse 10282 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th
WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 1 13576 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th
WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 2 6086 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th
WC’s–Female spectators Upper Concourse 3 3745 35% of 120% of GA capacity FIFA 5th FIFA 5th
Spectator Prayer Rooms–Male Lower Concourse 163 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 01 163 see detailed
Spectator Prayer Rooms–Male Upper Concourse 372 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 05 372 see detailed
Spectator Prayer Rooms–Female Lower Concourse 163 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 01 163 see detailed
Spectator Prayer Rooms–Female Upper Concourse 372 1m2/75 GA Spectator SC SC S 05 372 see detailed
3 Playing Area
3.01 Pitch 1 25 125X85 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 10625 10429 1.1.1 SB-001 This is the area where the match is played, includes area behind the goals and touchlines.
3.02 Players’ tunnel 1 90 4-6m width min 15m length FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 60 26 1.1.2 SB-002 An extendable tunnel protector is required from the mouth of the players’ tunnel beyond the first row of spectator seats – width to accommodate six people abreast.
3.03 Substitutes's bench 2 23 23 seats x 1m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 46 0 see detailed These are seats for the substitutes in designated positions next to the pitch adjacent to the main stand.
Team benches n/a n/a FOP not specified 1.1.3 not specified
3.04 Fourth official’s bench 1 4 4 seats x 1m FIFA 5t FIFA 5th FOP FOP 4 0 see detailed Same design as substitute benches. Provides seating for one match official and three event coordinators.
3.05 Players’ outdoor warm-up areas 2 14 3x30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 180 180 see detailed This is the area where the substitute players warm-up during the match.
This is the location from which stadium infomation operations are controlled and requires power and data points. Incorporate noise reduction elements in the design.
3.06 Infotainment desk 1 4 8x1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP 8 not specified not specified
Alternative location could be in the main stand within the CCR located adjacent to rhe Stadium Operations Centre.
3.07 Photographers’ positions 4 150-250 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Include media chairs behind goals. Domestic power to be supplied according to FIFA requirements. Internet access required.
3.08 Pitch to spectator seat – goal side TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Min. 10m. In addition refer to 3.10
3.09 Pitch to spectator seat – touchlines TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Min 8.5m. In addition refer to 3.10
3.10 Pitch protection TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Can be in the form of pitch protection barriers and / or security personnel.
3.11 Advertising boards – pitch perimeter TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th &SC FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Requires access to dedicated power supply with synchronised back-up supply for LED advertising boards. LED advertising boards measure between 0.90m-1.00m in height.
3.12 Advertising boards – blind side TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th FOP FOP TBD not specified not specified Can be attached to fencing or stadium bowl pitch perimeter. Blind side boards on main touchline measure 14 units of 4m wide by 0.7m in height.
3.13 Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access 2 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD 448 see detailed Four tunnels in the stadium corners are ideal to support pitch ventilation. Tunnel height to accommmodate service vehicles (min 5m).
3.14 Video screens / boards 2 - TBD FIFA 5th /SC FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified FIFA Competitions provides guidelines with respect to what content is captured on video boards. Video boards to incorporate both a scoreboard and clock.
May include FIFA, fair play, confederations, national, United Nations and IOC flags. Flag dimensions must be proportional with the stadium bowl. Positioning the flags must take
3.15 Interior stadium bowl flags TBD - TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified
into consideration the stadium floodlights in order for the flags to be visible from all areas (pitch/VVIP/VIP).
The floodlights are for the illumination of the field of play, with yielding of shadowless environment and in accordance with requirements by FIFA TV. Uninterrupted power
3.16 Floodlights TBD - TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB FOP TBD not specified not specified
supporting continual lighting lux to be supplied.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
3.17 Contingency pitch TBD - Min. 105m x 68m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th off site FOP TBD not specified not specified Contingency pitch for the stadium if required. To include necessary equipment and manpower to install pitch when required.
4.01 Dressing room - Team A 1 23 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 81 1.2.1.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0064
Dressing room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 81 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0070
4.02 Showers and toilet facilities - Team A 1 11 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 44 1.2.1.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0067
4.03 Massage room - Team A 1 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 47 1.2.1.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0065
Massage room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 46 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0071
4.04 Kit manager’s room - Team A 1 3 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 25 1.2.1.6 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0063
Kit manager’s room - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 26 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0069
4.05 Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A 1 4 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 31 1.2.1.4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0066
Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 31 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0072
Technical Office - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 23 1.2.1.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0086
Technical Office - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 23 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0088
4.06 Refreshment / utility area - Team A 1 TBD 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 15 1.2.1.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0133
Refreshment / utility area - Team A (Additional) n/a n/a S 15 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0134
Indoor warm-up areas are a benefit for stadiums hosting doubleheader matches as part of their legacy operations and provide an alternative warm-up area during inclement
4.07 Players’ Indoor Warm-up area - Team A 1 23 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 107 1.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0068
weather.
Used for players and team officials working close to the pitch. Stretcher access from the medical room to parking area for ambulances required. Refer to section 30, “Parking
Players’ Prayer Room - Team A n/a n/a S 57 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0087
facilities”.
4.08 Dressing room - Team B 1 23 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 82 1.2.3.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0052 This is the main dressing room for Team B and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.
Dressing room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 82 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0059
4.09 Showers & toilet facilities - Team B 1 11 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 43 1.2.3.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0055
Showers & toilet facilities - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 43 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0062 Minimum eleven shower heads. Towel hooks to be placed in an area next to showers for players to dry off. To include toilets, urinals and sinks with mirrors.
4.10 Massage room - Team B 1 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 47 1.2.3.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0053
Massage room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 47 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0060 The space would include 3 massage tables, utility table and ice machine.
4.11 Kit manager’s room - Team B 1 3 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 25 1.2.3.6 not specified
This is a small office for the kit manager to store and distribute kit for players. A table, two chairs and a lockable cupboard are required. Access/egress to this area must be
Kit manager’s room - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 not specified
accessible for large equipment.
4.12 Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team B 1 4 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 31 1.2.3.4 not specified Provide four lockers, chairs, table, one toilet and one shower.
Technical Office - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 1.2.3.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0089
Technical Office - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 25 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0090
4.13 Refreshment / utility area - Team B 1 TBD 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 15 1.2.3.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0135
Space should be made available for a refrigerator and tables so that beverages, food or other items can be laid out for easy access by players and staff. The space could be in
Refreshment / utility area - Team B (Additional) n/a n/a S 15 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0136
the open hallway area within team area or in dressing room itself.
Indoor warm-up areas are a benefit for stadiums hosting doubleheader matches as part of their legacy operations and provide an alternative warm-up area during inclement
4.14 Players’ Indoor Warm-up area - Team B 1 23 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 106 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0056
weather.
4.15 Referees’ 1–Dressing Room 1 5-7 24-35 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 24 44 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0079 Provide seven lockers, massage table, desk and chairs.
4.16 Referees’ 2–Dressing Room 1 2 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 inc. in dressing room FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0079 Provide two lockers, massage table, desk and chairs.
inc. in dressing
4.17 Referees’ Showers 1 1 3 3X1,5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 5 inc. in dressing room Provide three showers (with towel hooks) and one toilet. Could also be used to accommodate female referees.
room
inc. in dressing
4.18 Referees’ Showers 2 1 2 2X1,5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 3 374 inc. in dressing room Provide one shower (with towel hooks) and one toilet. Could also be used to accommodate female referees.
room
Players’ Prayer Room - Team B n/a n/a S 56 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0057
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
Dressing Room Circulation Area n/a n/a S 393 409 see detailed
Circulation 00 37
5 Medical Facilities
5.01 Stretcher-bearers’ and medical team area 2 3-4 8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 nonexixtent nonexixtent This is the position for medical personnel on the field, 5-8m from the touchline.
5.02 Players’ medical room 1 4 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 60 8.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0082
5.03 Medical officer’s room 1 2 inc. in 5.02 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S inc. in 5.02 nonexistent nonexistent
Circulation 00 3
Total 69 332
6 Doping Control
This is the area where players wait to be tested. The doping control room is connected to the waiting room and medical office. Must contain refrigerator with unopened drinks
6.01 Total_Waiting room 1 8 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 55 see detailed
in plastic bottles, TV and waste bin.
Must be well ventilated, brightly lit with easily washable and non-slippery floors. Must contain two desks with four chairs, one lockable cabinet, two waste bins, wash basin and
6.02 Medical office 1 4 16 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 16 nonexistent nonexistent
a mirror.
Toilets must be linked to the medical office and large enough for for two people. Must be well ventilated, brightly lit with easily washable and non-slippery floors. Must
6.03 Toilet 1 2 4 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 4 6 8.2.1.3 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0138
conatina toilet, wash basin, mirror, shower and waste bin.
Total 36
Circulation 00 2
Total 38 61
7 FIFA Offices
7.01 General coordinator’s (GC) office 1 2-3 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 42 5.1.19 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0095 This is the office for the FIFA representatives managing match day operations.
7.02 GC meeting room (crisis management) 1 10 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 51 5.1.20 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 not specified
7.03 GC storage room 1 n/a 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 21 5.1.21 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0096 Lockable and secure location required.
Match coordination room required for match day minus one meeting team representatives. Ideally, the room should have a pleasant ambience for meeting team
7.04 Match coordination meeting room 1 40 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 100 5.1.22 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0037
representatives.
7.05 Match commissioner office 1 1 60 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 60 nonexistent nonexistent May include areas listed in 7.6-7.10.
7.06 Head of delegation’s office 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent
7.07 Technical Study Group office 1 2-3 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent
7.08 Referees Committee member’s office 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent
7.09 Referees’ assessor 1 1 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent
7.10 Referees’ video specialist office 1 2 incl. 7.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th s 00 incl. 7.05 nonexistent nonexistent
7.11 Security office 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 22 5.1.27 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0076 Ideally located near or with LOC security office.
Room ideally adjacent to the stadium bowl but within the perimeter of the stadium for players' escorts, flag-bearers and ball kids. Should be an open area for meals and
7.12 Youth programme room 1 100 300 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 300 nonexistent 7.1.3 nonexistent
recreation and ideally have an outdoor playing area. Changing rooms and toilets for both boys and girls are essential.
7.13 Ball kids holding room and toilets 1 TBD 30-40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 33 5.1.14 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0246 Required area with toilet for ball kids during the half-time break only. Does not need to be in the stadium technical zone but must have easy access to and from the pitch.
7.14 Mascot dressing room 1 3-4 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 10 21 5.1.10 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0075 Access to toilets
7.15 Marketing office 1 4-5 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 45 5.1.25 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 Typically used on match days and / or when the general coordinator will be working from the stadium. Lockable cabinet required.
7.16 Rights protection programme (RPP) office 1 1-2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 nonexistent nonexistent The RPP office in the stadium is generally used on match days.
7.17 RPP meeting room 1 8-10 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 nonexistent nonexistent Can be a shared space and used for other meetings when not required. The RPP manager will use this room to meet with authorities on match days.
7.18 RPP storage room 1 n/a 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 50 nonexistent nonexistent Storage for counterfeit and illegal products seized at the stadium.
7.19 Coca-Cola logistics office 1 2 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent This office is for the Coca-Cola staff to manage deliveries and quantities of VIK and product for concessions. May be located within the back-of-house compound.
7.20 Cash-handling office 1 2 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 30 25 5.1.4 Logistics Compound (Precicnt) not specified Area required for a safe where merchandise and F&B outlets can deposit excess cash. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.
7.21 Storage for credit card payment devices 1 2 3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 3 not specified 5.1.5 not specified Used for general storage and repair of credit card payment devices used at F&B and merchandise Concessions.
7.22 LED advertising boards operator position 1 2 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 15 nonexistent nonexistent Required for the operation of the advertising boards. Must be airconditioned dur to computer equipment used int his room. Also used for meetings.
7.23 Merchandise concessionaire office 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 20 20 5.1.7 Logistics Compound (Precicnt) not specified Office location for merchandise concessionaire, for general operations. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.
7.24 F&B concessionaire office 1 3-4 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 40 not specified Office location for F&B concessionaire, for general operations. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.
In the event LED boards or rational boards are installed at the stadium, a location for two containers is required in proximity to the stadium in addition to a storage location
7.25 Signage / advertising boards storage 1 n/a 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 nonexistent nonexistent
near the pitch. Access to power required. Located in precint in Tender Scheme.
7.27 Hospitality office 1 2-4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 25 5.1.11 FFL Plaza PL PL-0233
7.28 Hospitality rights holder office 1 2-4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 26 5.1.26 FFL Hospitality Club 01-0074 Adjacent to hospitality areas.
7.29 Protocol office 1 4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 41 5.1.1 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0033 Ideally located near or with LOC protocol office.
7.30 IT stadium infrastructure support 1 5 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 nonexistent nonexistent Within the stadium bowl but outside the competition areas and VIP/VVIP facilities.
7.31 Central results system 1 TBD 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 nonexistent nonexistent
7.32 IT command centre (ITCC) 1 60 650 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 650 nonexistent nonexistent Located within the IBC for the FWC and FIFA HQ or broadcast areas during the FCC.
7.33 IT liaison 1 1 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 10 13 5.1.13 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0028
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
Circulation 00 44
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
8 LOC Offices
8.01 Venue manager office 1 1 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 43 5.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0091
8.02 Venue manager assistant 1 1-2 incl. 8.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 8.01 incl. 8.01
8.03 Site manager 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent This is an area where the site manager coordinates the installation ans maintenace of temporary structures along with the service providers. See section 11.
8.04 Working rooms / hot desk 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent Assigned to staff not permanently allocated to specific stadium or staff not previously accounted for.
8.05 IT office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 15 not specified Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.
8.06 Signage office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 150 not specified Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.
8.07 Infotainment office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.08 Logistics office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.09 Transport office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent 5.2.6 nonexistent
8.10 Marketing office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 50 5.2.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0025
8.11 Medical office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.12 Drivers’ room 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 50 5.2.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0025
8.13 Security office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent 5.2.8 nonexistent
8.14 Hospitality office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.15 Protocol office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 44 5.2.9 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0034
8.16 Catering (F&B) office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.17 Volunteer office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P p 25 80 5.2.7 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.
8.18 General office TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 159 5.2.4 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0029
8.19 Media hot desk 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent
8.20 Ceremonies office 1 TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 nonexistent nonexistent Office opening match, final and third-place match venues only.
8.21 Stadium management offices TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 24 B3-0004 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.
8.22 Stadium facilities management offices TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 24 5.2.5 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0004 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.
8.23 Stadum grounds keeper facilities TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 351 B3-0001 To support the stadium operations during the FWC and in legacy mode.
8.24 Other TBD TBD Est. FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 25 60 see detailed
Circulation 00 28
9 Ceremonies
Opening / closing ceremonies Area required for opening / closing ceremony rehearsals F&B requirements, holding areas, toilets and sanitary facilities and transport requirements etc. Size of the location
9.03 TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 496 1296 800 see detailed
additional facilities_Total dependent on the ceremonies programme. In the Tender Scheme these areas include the production team office, the set up area and the storage space.
Circulation 00 6
10 Merchandise Shops
Temporary kiosks may be required, depending on stadium capacity and existing structures situated at the stadium. Minimum of 8-25 kiosks required of various sizes. Power to
10.01 Official merchandise shops / kiosks_Total 8-25 TBD 16-250 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 128 0
be supplied by the stadium to all outlets and surrounding area, must be well lit.
Ideally secure space inside the stadium of minimum 500m² is available. If space or limited space is not available within the stadium, a space for 6 -12 sea containers (dependent
10.02 Merchandise storage_Total TBD TBD 500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 500 1500
on stadium capacity) is required.
11 Service Compounds
The location of the compound is to support various operations and the storage of goods, i.e. F&B, IT&T, merchandise, logistics, site management, waste management etc. The
layout of the compound(s) should include demacration of areas with security fencing (2 metres high), dry and cold storage containers and dedicated access gates with sufficient
11.01 Back-of-house compound TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 1480 6566 see detailed area for simulateous large delivery vehicles and forklifts. Area should be clear of internal spectator traffic and venue dressing applied to fence lines to conceal the operation.
The compound must have proper ground preparation, drainage, lighting and services. As this area will be erected prior to/during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence
is required pre-, post- and during operations. Power distribution may be required for refrigerated containers.
Ideally, 150% of stadium capacity inventory to be stored in existing facilities. The remaining inventory will be stored in containers within the stadium perimeter (back of house).
11.02 F&B dry/cold storage TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed
It is important that this compound is as close to the stadium as possible. Power to be supplied by stadium.
This is a space in the stadium precinct for temporary storage, where sufficient storage is not available in the stadium. Can be used for merchandise storage. Minimum height
11.03 Merchandise compound TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 not specified
clearance of 4.8m to be considered.
11.04 Waste removal / recycling TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed
11.05 Logistics compound / office TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th BP S/P incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 33860 see detailed
11.06 Site management compound TBD TBD incl. 11.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 11.01 incl. in 11.01 see detailed
11.07 Back-up generators TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP P 2500 3000 B2-0008 Located in Precint in Tender Scheme.
Circulation 00 74
12.01 Stadium signage and decor office 2 TBD 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 not specified not specified
Stadium signage and decor storage / workroom
12.02 1 TBD 150 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P P 150 150 7.1.7 Logistics compound (Precinct) not specified Requires power and must be suitable for working conditions. Located in precint in the Tender Scheme.
12.03 Signage storage 1 TBD 100-150 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 100 not specified not specified Area separate from advertising boards signage.
Circulation 00 7
Unless otherwise agreed by FIFA in writing, for the FIFA World Cup™, each stadium
13.01 Total Skyboxes/Suites & Hospitality Lounges 7120 8% of Stadium Gross Capacity FIFA 5th FIFA % requirement S should have the following: eight per cent (8%) of total number of seats (i.e. all seats including the seat kills, media tribune and VIP tribune) for opening match, semi finals and
final.
13.02 Skybox satelite kitchens 1 TBD 10% total Skybox space FIFA 5th BP S 03 427 6.1.8 see detailed
Lounge kitchens 1 TBD 30% lounge space FIFA 5th BP S 02 1495 6.1.8 see detailed
50% of capacity
Hospitality Skyboxes Toilets Male 3560 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 464 see detailed
50% of capacity
Hospitality Skyboxes Toilets Female 3560 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 450 see detailed
50% of capacity
Hospitality Lounges Toilets Female 2492 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 23 see detailed
Circulation 852
01 37
02 482
03 333
13.03 VIP lounge - opening and final 1 1350 1350 x 1 FIFA FIFA 5th S 02 1350 1939 4.2.4 FFL VIP Lounge VP PL-0027
13.05 VIP lounge - quarter-final n/a 875 FFL VIP Lounge VP VP-0002
13.07 VVIP lounge - opening and final 1 150 150 x 1.8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 270 769 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0001 Dedicated walkways, entrances, lifts and stairwells required for VVIPs and VIPs.
LOC President’s (Chairman’s) Provide high-quality sofas and armchairs, clean broadcast feed
13.12 1 6 6X2.5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 15 21 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0028
lounge required by IT and unobstructed view of the pitch preferred. Adjacent to FIFA President’s lounge.
13.13 Bodyguards / security personnel - opening match and final 1 100 100x1 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 100 41 FFL Hospitality Club 1 01-0148 Clean broadcast feed required by IT. To be taken in consideration with 8.15. As close to VIP areas.
13.15 VVIP/VIP interview position 2 4 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 24 5 2.1.10 FFL Lower Plaza West PL PL-0028 Might be included in the VIP lounge.
13.16 VVIP/VIP medical room(s) 1 to 2 4 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 02 20 44 not specified
13.17 VIP Kitchen(s) 1 TBD 30% Lounge FIFA 5th BP S 02 405 646 not specified
13.17 VVIP Kitchen 1 TBD 30% Lounge FIFA 5th BP S 03 90 102 not specified
13.18 VIP welcome desk - opening match and final 1 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 40 42 FFL Plaza PL PL-0230 Fixed position throughout the tournament with access to power. Electronic access control system utilised in this area to validate tickets.
13.21 VVIP welcome desk 1 10 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 22 FFL Plaza PL PL-0229 Fixed position throughout the tournament with access to power. Electronic access control system utilised in this area to validate tickets.
50% of capacity
VVIP Toilets Female 75 FIFA 5th BP S 03 60 see detailed
50% of capacity
VIP Toilets Female 675 FIFA 5th BP S 02 87 see detailed
VVIP Circulation & other spaces n/a n/a S 03 2515 see detailed
VIP Circulation & other spaces n/a n/a S 02 770 see detailed
Circulation 223
02 154
03 70
150m-300m from centre of stadium. Requires a hard, flat well-drained surface to accommodate heavy vehicles and equipment. Use of existing halls or marquees. Provision of
bulk services to all marquees, i.e. lighting, power, water and drainage of waste/water. Security fences installed, and venue dressing applied when public areas are adjacent.
14.01 Commercial Affiliate Village - final 1 5000-7000 5-5.6m² per occupancy FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 35000 40313 6.2.1 Precinct Communications network to the areas/marquees: TV (all channels), phone and IT&T. Access to the site required a minimum of three months prior to the exclusive use period.
Pedestrian pathways from guest drop-off/parking locations to village marquee entrance to stadium and back ideally concrete, asphalt or appropriate pathways to create a level
and stable route for all guests.
150m-300m from centre of stadium. Requires a hard, flat well-drained surface to accommodate heavy vehicles and equipment. Use of existing halls or marquees. Provision of
bulk services to all marquees, i.e. lighting, power, water and drainage of waste/water. Security fences installed, and venue dressing applied when public areas are adjacent.
14.05 Commercial Hospitality - final 1 N/A 4.6m² per occupancy FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 50000 60549 Precinct Communications network to the areas/marquees: TV (all channels), phone and IT&T. Access to the site required a minimum of three months prior to the exclusive use period.
Pedestrian pathways from guest drop-off/parking locations to village marquee entrance to stadium and back ideally concrete, asphalt or appropriate pathways to create a level
and stable route for all guests.
15.01 Multilateral flash interview 2 4 6 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 12 2.1.4 Location near tunnel entrance to be identified at all venues and cable pathways to be identified. Technical and domestic power provided in this area.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
15.02 Unilateral flash interview 6 4 6 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 36 36 2.1.7 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0078 Cable pathways to be identified. Technical and domestic power provided in this area.
15.0315.05 Presentation studios 8 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB 03 320 307 see detailed
15.06 TV/ Interview Studios 4 8 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 160 199 see detailed
15.08 Mixed zone 1 250-300 600 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 600 645 3.1.2 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0084 Location between dressing rooms and players’ coaches to be identified. Size and layout to be jointly determined with Media and TV.
15.09 Coach on Arrival Interview Position 2 TBD 90 FIFA 5th BP S 00 180 35 not specified
Circulation 00 67
Close proximity to players' dressing rooms and mixed zone. Seating & standing requirements per venue to be determined (150 - 200 seats). Opening match and final venues to
16.01 Press conference room 1 150-200 500 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 500 512 3.1.1 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0041
cater for higher attendance.
16.02 Head table 1 6 incl. 16.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01
16.03 Interpreting booths 3-4 6-8 incl. 16.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01 FIFA official languages are Spanish, French, English and German. Provide services for two teams.
16.04 Camera platform 1 TBD 2 x 10-20m FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S incl. 16.01 incl. 16.01 Location within press conference room. Platform construction may be split levels within same area, audio split of PA.
Control room / space for A/V, live streaming and remote interpretation
n/a n/a 3.1.1.2 see detailed
services
Total net room area 500
Circulation 00 25
17 Media Areas–Tribune
The media tribune must make provision to increase and reduce its capacity (i.e. desk positions replaced for spectator seating and vice for larger and smaller matches. The
17.01 Press positions, with desks 1000 1000 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 1276 3.1.5 SB-024 media tribune consists of positions for written press with and without desks. Desk positions include seats with desks, power, cabled internet access (all seats) and a television
monitor (one monitor per three desk seats).
Minimal technical services or power required, if any. For the FWC the following is required: group match 300; quarter-finals 400, semi-finals and third-place match 800, opening
17.02 Press positions, without desks 1000 1000 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 524 3.1.6 SB-025
match and final 1,000.
17.03 Refreshment area TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 05 20 nonexistent nonexistent
17.04 Tribune photographers 100 100 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 100 see detailed
17.05 Observer seats 375 375 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above 245 see detailed
Seat allocations, by constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium. Construction of desks, seats, cable pathways and
technical power to be identified. One commentary position (which houses three people) typically takes up the space of a minimum of six (6) seats, typically seven (7) to nine (9)
seats (two sequential rows of three). Typically the design of the commentary positions is venue-specific. Group stage, round of 16 and third-place match require 110. For the
17.06 Commentary positions 160 160 1.80 x 0.60 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB inc. above inc. above
remaining matches, 120 for quarte-finals; 130 for semi-finals; 160 for opening match and final. Dimensions are 1.8m wide x 1.6m separated by Perspex. Also required are
domestic and technical power, data cables, telecoms cables, two monitors. Twenty per cent (20%) of the broadcast commentary positions at the rear of the tribune may
accommodate a commentary camera.
17.07 Cableways TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S/P TBD nonexistent nonexistent
Pitch photographers’ positions n/a n/a not dpecified 3.1.3 not dpecified
Opening match and final to be the larger number. Area to include bulk servixes, i.e. sufficient lighting, drainage and access to power supply etc. As this area will be erected
IAAF & FIFA
18.01 Total Area of Stadium Media Centre (SMC) 1 800-2000 4000-7000 FIFA 5th OP P 7000 during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post and during operations. Pedestrian pathways to include level, drainage surface from point of
5th
transport drop-off, pick-up and parking.
18.02 Rate card service desk 1 4-8 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Space to be coordinated with LOC rate card planning.
18.03 IT office (rate card) 1 3 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Similar to the MATCH IT office.
18.04 IT storage (rate card) 1 n/a 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Storage for rate card-related assets.
18.05 Offices – SMC 1 8-12 32-48 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Final venue requires the larger amount (48).
18.06 Copy area TBD incl. 18.05 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.05 25 3.2.16 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
18.07 Meeting room 1-2 20-30 80-120 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 0 incl. 18.01 see detailed
18.08 Camera repair service 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 50 see detailed
18.09 Information desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 100 see detailed
Catering area for journalists for purchase of hot food. Space to include a buffet, counters, fridges, tables & chairs. Ideally, food preparation area i.e. grills, fryers, would also be
18.10 Cafeteria and lounge (catering area) 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.31 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
available.
18.11 Pigeon holes 1 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.23 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
18.12 Welcome desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01
18.13 Ticket distribution desk Media Tribune 2 2 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 50 see detailed
18.14 Host city information desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 10 3.2.24 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
18.15 Medical room 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01
18.16 Media work desks 1 500-1000 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.12 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) Final match requires the larger amount (1,000).
18.17 Total_Photographers' work desks 1 100-150 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 260 incl. 18.01 419 see detailed Final match requires the larger amount (150).
18.18 Lockers (with padlocks) 1 200-300 incl. 18.01 FFIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 3.2.22 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) Size of lockers (trolleys for photographers). Final match requires the larger amount (300).
18.19 Press agency offices TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Press agency offices is roughly 1,000m² located within the SMC or IBC.
18.20 Vending machines TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01
18.21 Transportation desk 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 10 3.2.26 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
18.22 Media storage room TBD TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 25 3.2.15 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
18.23 Office for Telecom Partner 1 TBD incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 25 3.2.27 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
18.24 Offices – Editors 1 5 400 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 400m² offices for the editors.
18.25 Office – FIFA media officers 1 2-4 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01
18.26 Interpreting centre 1 6-8 incl. 18.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP incl. 18.01 Space to include eight (8) sound-proof interpreting booths, a control room and a lounge.
18.27 ATM 1 TBD FIFA 5th OP TBD Official event bank may install an ATM in each SMC.
Circulation 0
19.01 FIFA.com office – opening match/final 1 120 TBD FIFA 5th BP S 00 480
19.03 FIFA Media Channel 1 6-7 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 30 10 3.2.33 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
19.04 Content Management Services 1 5 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 25 10 3.2.34 Stadium Media Centre (Precinct)
Circulation 00 24
Total 504 0 55 20
20 Broadcast Compound
Provision of space, fence/gates, cable pathways into stadium, temporary buildings, storage space and technical power. Office/technical/production space within each broadcast
compound provided by the LOC. Area for mobile units and fly away units for both the host broadcaster and media rights licensees with technical requirements to broadcast the
event from the stadium.l For the opening match/semi-final/final venues, 6000m2 is required. For all remaining stadiums, 4000m2 is required. Area to include bulk services, i.e.
20.01 Broadcast compound 1 TBD 6000m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th OP 6000 6820
sufficient lighting, drainage and access to power supply etc. As this area will be erected during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post- and during
operations, and 24-hour safety and security to be in place. Pedestrian pathways to include level, drained surface from point of vehivle drop-off, pick-up and parking. Area to be
available prior to the exclusive use period.
20.02 Satellite farm 1 TBD incl. 20.01 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 20.01 Ideally located in the broadcast compound but should an exception be required, this may be situated adjacent to the broadcast compound. Unobstructed view of the sky.
20.03 Host broadcaster offices / graphics house / storage 1 TBD 300-400m2 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 300 300 - 400m² of office and production space within or adjacent to the compound.
21 Broadcast Areas
21.01 Commentary control room (CCR) 1 20 80 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 80 88 2.1.12 FFL Lower Plaza West 3 03-0150 Location includes installation and construction, cable pathways, HVAC and both technical and domestic power to be identified.
21.02 Commentary control room – storage 1 n/a 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 30 28 2.1.13 FFL Lower Plaza West 3 03-0166
21.03 Announcer’s platform 4 4 8 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 8 nonexistent 2.1.6 nonexistent Location requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
21.04 Rate card technical areas 1 2 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 20 nonexistent nonexistent Similar to secondary technical areas (STA) requirements.
21.05 Rate card support 2 2 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 nonexistent nonexistent Two seats in the media tribune.
Consists of easy-to-rig pathways for cabling for all mulitlateral and unilateral facilities, i.e. camera platforms, TV studios, presentation studios, announcer platforms. Special
21.06 Cable pathways TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 nonexistent nonexistent
cable paths in commentary are required. Detailed specifications by hot broadcaster.
The cable protection of all routes should have either temporary or permanent cable bridges or ducts installed from the broadcast compound to the various camera positions,
21.07 Cable bridges and ducts (Central Broadcast Apparatus Room) TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 00 72 FFL Lower Plaza West B3 B3-0005
the commentary positions, mixed zone, SMC, CCR and firld of play.
Circulation 00 7
22 Camera Positions
22.01 Camera 1 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.02 Camera 2 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.03 Camera 3&4 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.04 Camera 5&6 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.05 Camera 7&8 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.06 Camera 9 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.07 Camera 10 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.08 Camera 11 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.09 Camera 12&13 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.10 Camera 14 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.11 Camera 15 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.12 Camera 16&17 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.13 Camera 18 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.14 Camera 19&20 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
22.15 Camera 21 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.16 Camera 22 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.17 Camera 23&24 2 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.18 Camera 25 1 1 2x3 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 6 not specified Venue-specific camera plans to be developed in accordance with the agreed production plan. Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.19 Unilateral camera position – centre left 1 1 2.5 x 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 25 not specified Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.20 Unilateral camera position – centre right 1 1 2.5 x 10 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 25 not specified Requires platform construction, cable pathways and power.
22.21 Unilateral camera position – goal left 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified
22.22 Unilateral camera position – goal right 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified
22.23 Unilateral camera position – field left 1 1 1 2.5 x 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 30 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
22.24 Unilateral camera position – field left 2 1 1 2.5 x 9 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 23 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
Unilateral camera position - field right 1
22.25 1 1 2.5 x 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 30 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
Unilateral camera position - field right 2
22.26 1 1 2.5 x 9 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 23 not specified Requires cable pathways and power. Platform requirements to be added to camera drawings.
22.27 Unilateral camera position – reverse left 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified
22.28 Unilateral camera position – reverse right 1 1 2.5 x 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB 13 not specified
22.29 Spider-cam & control desk TBD 1 TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB TBD not specified Placement of anchors should minimise seat kills.
22.30 3D cameras TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th SB SB TBD not specified Located alongside the main camera and on the field of play.
Not included in the stadium n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Located outside Stadium Precinct–Not included in this brief.
Total 0 0
24 IT Technical Areas
The technology compound is the ideal approach for the delivery of the space required for stadium IT. If there is no possibility to deliver these locations in one area, then the
24.01 Technology compound 1 114 1100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 1100
locations will need to be distributed throughout the venue. Access to this area will be required in advance of the exclusive use period (6-8 weeks in advance).
Central technical areas within the stadium that will house the core technology components. Space for minimum 8 x 19" racks - 24m2; Easy access to the equipmene; Axxess to
24.02 Primary technical area (PTA) 1 1 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 wiring racks from all sides; Space for back-up power supply and sufficient climate control and protection against external elements. Area must be lockable, dust-free with a
raised floor.
Central technical areas within the stadium that will house the core technology components. Space for minimum 8 x 19" racks - 24m2; Easy access to the equipmene; Axxess to
24.03 Primary technical area (PTA) 2 1 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 wiring racks from all sides; Space for back-up power supply and sufficient climate control and protection against external elements. Area must be lockable, dust-free with a
raised floor.
This space will be used by the management team with representatives from MATCH IT, LOC IT, Telecommunications support staff (FIFA IT solution and rate card), local
24.04 IT management office 1 20 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01
operations teams (LOC).
This space will be used by the management team with representatives from MATCH IT, LOC IT, Telecommunications support staff (FIFA IT solution and rate card), local
24.06 IT support office 1 30 140 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01
operations teams (LOC) and the companies supporting areas of power and event radios.
24.07 IT reception and support desk 1 8 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 LOC IT and radios (including 15m² for storage).
24.10 Telecommunications provider storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Inventory for FIFA IT solution and rate card.
24.11 Technical services storage 1 8 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Inventory for event radios and power.
24.13 Generators area 1 8 50 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 24.01 Dedicated for the provision of power in the technology compound.
24.14 Secondary technical areas (STA) TBD TBD 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 15 These are decentralised technical areas within the stadium that will house the distribution components.
24.15 Local technical areas (LTA) TBD TBD 5 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 5 Local space at area where IT is deployed to house local cabling and hardware (switches).
Total 0 81 1120 0
25 Accreditation Centre
25.01 Accreditation centre 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 1200
25.02 Security desk 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.1 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.03 Queuing area 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.2 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.04 Welcome desk 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.3 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.05 Image capture desks 4-8 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.4 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.06 Print station 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.5 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.07 Accreditation office 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.6 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Office allocated to accreditation manager / coordinator.
25.08 General offices 3 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.7 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Offices used for accreditation staff and meeting rooms.
25.09 Lounge and refreshments 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.8 Accreditation Centre (Precinct)
25.10 IT office 1 TBD 15 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P incl. 25.01 5.3.9 Accreditation Centre (Precinct) Office space for support and storage.
Total 0 0 1200 0
Stadium Ticket Centre (STC) P 432 702 5.4.1 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)
26.01 Front office 1 40 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 100 5.4.1.1 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 50m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 70m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 100m2.
26.02 Queuing area 1 150 200 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 200 5.4.1.2 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 120m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 150m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 200m2.
26.03 Trouble-shooting area 1 10 12 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 12 5.4.1.3 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Five people at counter, five solving issues.
26.04 Back office 1 10 40 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 40 5.4.1.4 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) Group-stage and round-16 matches to cater for 25m2, Quarter-finals and semi-finals for 40m2 and opening match and final matches cater for 40m2.
26.05 Ticketing manager office 1 2 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 30 5.4.1.5 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)
26.06 Meeting rooms 2 10 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 60 5.4.1.6 Ticketing Centre (Precinct)
26.07 Secure storage 1 N/A 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 20 see detailed The area of 20m² is subdivided in two rooms. The first room is for ticket stock (4m²) the second for hardware (16m²).
26.08 Rest Area 1 10 30 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th P 30 20 Ticketing Centre (Precinct) One vending machine per STC to be located in the rest area.
Spectator Plaza, close to Inner
Ticket clearing points (see 1.04) n/a n/a IP 72 5.4.2
Perimeter (Precinct)
Total 0 0 492 702
27 Volunteer Centre
27.01 Reception Desk TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP P TBD 1397
Volunteer Centre - Welcome Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.1 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
27.02 Offices TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th inc. 27.01 P inc. 27.01 inc. 27.01 5.5.2 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
Socializing Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.3 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
Animation / Entertainment Zone n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.4 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
Storage n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.6 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
27.03 Volunteers’ Rest Area TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th inc. 27.01 P inc. 27.01 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
Cafeteria/Kitchen area n/a n/a P inc. 27.01 5.5.5 Volunteer Centre (Precinct) not specified
Total 0 0 0 1397
28 Flagpoles
28.01 Exterior stadium flags TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th & SC FIFA 5th & SC P TBD 20 Logistics Compound (Precinct) Exterior flags to be proposed by designer.
Total 0 46 0 20
29.01 Rail Stations TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent
29.02 Park and Ride TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent Facilities must cater for mobility-impaired spectators.
29.03 Spectator parking (park and wait) TBD TBD TBD FIFA 5th FIFA 5th n/a nonexistent nonexistent Facilities must cater for mobility-impaired spectators.
Total 0 0 0 0
30 Parking Facilities
Drop-off and pick-up ideally underneath the main stand. If exposed to spectator missile, then overhang or canopy covering the buses should be minimum 4.8m height. Canopy
30.01 Team bus drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 2 buses 90 FIFA 5th BP S 00 180 1.2.101 not specified should extend from the buses to players' entrance into the stadium, and back to the buses from the mixed zone exit, if different location. Additional parking for police escort
vehicles to be considered in the overall parking allocation.
30.02 Team car parking 12 12 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 540 not specified Car parking for six cars per team. Additional LOC support and police escort vehicles to be considered in overall allocation.
30.03 Team equipment van 2 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 180 1.2.103 not specified
30.04 Team guests' parking 12 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 300 0 Six cars and one bus per team, situated with direct access to the relevant seating allocation within the stadium bow.
Drop-off and pick-up ideally underneath the main stand. If exposed to spectator missile, then overhang or canopy covering vehicles should extend the match officials' entry/exit
30.05 Match officials' drop-off/ pick-up/ parking 1 minibus 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 90
point of stadium. Parking located near the entrance. Additional parking for police escort vehicles to be considered in the overall allocation.
30.06 Ambulance parking 4 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 100 8.2.4 Vehicle space for four ambulances, each with a defibrillator for care of players, team officials, VVIPs / VIPs and FIFA delegation.
30.07 Doping control collection vehicle 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 8.2.5
30.08 VIP drop-off 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 not specified Dedicated walkways, entrances, lifts and stairwells required for VVIPs and VIPs.
At main entrance. Dedicated drop-off with direct access route to VVIP lounge by dedicated lift/ stairs. 80 VVIPs will be dropped off at this point and parking must be available
30.09 VVIP drop-off 1 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 25 not specified
within close proximity. Additional parking for police escort vehicles to be considered in the overall parking allocation.
30.10 VVIP cars - opening match and final 80 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP S 00 2000 not specified Next to VVIP entrance.
30.13 VIP cars - opening match and final 200 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 5000
30.15 VIP buses - opening match and final 45 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P P 4050 not specified Within 100m of VIP entrance. 30-40 seater buses preferred.
VVIP Load zone, bays (cars) n/a n/a 153 4.1.101 Emir and VVIP drop off (Precinct)
VVIP parking (cars) n/a n/a 6155 4.1.102 Precinct (Within outer perimeter)
Precinct (South of the Emir/VVIP drop
Emir's motorcade parking n/a n/a 259
off)
VIP shuttle services Load zone (bays) and parking area (buses) n/a n/a 4.2.101
VIP shuttle services Load zone (bays) and parking area (cars) n/a n/a 4.2.102
VIP parking (cars) n/a n/a 12388 4.2.103 Precinct (outside inner perimeter)
30.17 Commercial affiliate hospitality - host 100 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 2500 Marketing will work on a ration of tickets to parking passes based on the total availability of parking spaces at the various venues.
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
30.19 Commercial hospitality - opening match and final 200 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 5000
30.21 Commercial hospitality - host 800 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 20000
30.23 Commercial hospitality - opening match and final 1000 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 25000
30.24 Total_Commercial affiliate non-hospitality FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P 0 Larger amount for the opening match, quarter finals, semi-finals and final.
30.25 Commercial display 100 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 4000 Quantity of passes requested depends on activation of commercial display by the commercial affiliates.
30.28 Marketing operations - host nation, group 50 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP
30.30 Marketing operations - opening match and final 100 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP 0
30.31 FIFA / LOC staff parking 100 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 4500
30.32 FIFA/ LOC staff shuttle drop-off 1 buses 90 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P P 90 Within stadium close to the main entrance
30.33 TV broadcast parking - opening match, semi-final and final 250 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 6250 Standard car parking spaces. Separate from broadcast compound.
30.35 Media parking 250 45 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 11250 Final stadium is allocated the larger amount.
Host Broadcasters own vehicle Load zone, bays (bus) n/a n/a 2.1.101
Media Rights Licensee’s (MRL) own vehicle parking (cars) n/a n/a 2.1.104
30.36 Media drop-off 1 cars 25 FIFA 5th P p 25 Closest to media tribune or SMC entrance. Media drop-off may include shuttle services.
30.37 Volunteer centre (cars) 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.5.101
30.38 Accreditation centre parking 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.3.101
30.39 Stadium ticketing centre (STC) 15 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 375 5.4.101
Breakdown of parking allocation as follows: 20 parking spaces for MATCH IT & LOC IT staff, 15 parking spaces for rate card staff and 50 parking spaces for IT command centre
30.40 IT&T parking 85 cars 25 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th / BP P p 2125 10.1.101
staff.
31 Security Services
31.02 Stadium Operations Center (SOC) 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 03 130 276
31.03 Stadium operations meeting room 1 TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP S 03 30 28 FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 02-0155 Meeting room required for daily briefings, de-briefings and emergency meetings for stadium-related matters.
31.04 Sound control room 1 3 20 FIFA 5th FIFA 5th S 03 15 Full view of the pitch, stadium and replay screen
To include the following: vehicle queue, vehicle screening area, oversized vehicle screening area, by-pass lane, observation platform, security area (work & break area for
31.09 Remote search park / vehicle screening TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP TBD 32
screening personnel), material transfer area, toilets, lighting, vehicle permit check.
31.10 Spectator egress gates TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP Gates next to entry points for spectator egress.
31.11 Emergency Vehicles TBD TBD FIFA 5th BP IP 120 Security Compound (Precinct) Ambulance, fire engine and police parking within the stadium precinct.
31.12 Casualty clearing station TBD TBD FIFA 5th SC IP 9000 Governmental and host city plans will determine the requirements of this point.
31.13 Stewards’ holding area TBD TBD FIFA 5th SC S 00 3260 3261 Rest area required for stewards working at the stadium. Area to include lockers, toilets and sanitary facilities, F&B facilities, etc.
31.14 Helipad 1-2 TBD FIFA 5th IP TBD Large open area for helicopter landing / staging of VVIPs and emergency services.
Multi-casualty staging area n/a n/a 9195 8.1.11 FFL Lower Plaza B2
Total 3515
FIFA category Space Requirements Design Requirement & Relevant Guidance VE Redesign Location Stadium Precinct Tender Scheme Reference & Location
Circulation 176
00 167
03 9
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
2 Spectator Areas
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
2.04 Total_Spectator Seating 92000 Minimum seat spacing of 500mm for general spectators.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Spectator seats
Total_Concourse 27079
Concourse - GA Box Level - South east SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 587 02-0124
Concourse - GA Box Level - North east SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 586 02-0126
Concourse - GA Box Level - North west SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 529 02-0008
Concourse - GA Box Level -South west SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 529 02-0015
Concourse - GA Lower tier - North SB FFL Upper Tier 3 2904 9.4 03-0356
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
3 Playing Area
3.03 Total_Substitutes's bench 0 These are seats for the substitutes in designated positions next to the pitch adjacent to the main stand.
not
Substitutes's bench FOP 1.1.3 SB-003
specified
not
Substitutes's bench FOP SB-004
specified
3.04 Total_Fourth official’s bench 0 Same design as substitute benches. Provides seating for one match official and three event coordinators.
not
Fourth official’s bench FOP 1.1.4 SB-005
specified
not
Fourth official’s bench FOP SB-006
specified
3.05 Total_Players’ outdoor warm-up areas 180 This is the area where the substitute players warm-up during the match.
Four tunnels in the stadium corners are ideal to support pitch ventilation. Tunnel height to accommmodate service vehicles (min
3.13 Total_Service tunnel / Pitch Area Access 448
5m).
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
4.01 Total_Team A - dressing room 81 This is the main dressing room for Team A and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.
Minimum eleven shower heads. Towel hooks to be placed in an area next to showers for players to dry off. To include toilets,
4.02 Total_Showers & toilet facilities - Team A 60
urinals and sinks with mirrors.
4.03 Total_Massage room - Team A 93 The space would include 3 massage tables, utility table and ice machine.
This is a small office for the kit manager to store and distribute kit for players. A table, two chairs and a lockable cupboard are
4.04 Total_Kit manager’s room - Team A 51
required. Access/egress to this area must be accessible for large equipment.
4.05 Total_Coach Office/Changing Rooms - Team A 108 Provide four lockers, chairs, table, one toilet and one shower.
Space should be made available for a refrigerator and tables so that beverages, food or other items can be laid out for easy access
4.06 Total_Refreshment / utility area - Team A 30
by players and staff. The space could be in the open hallway area within team area or in dressing room itself.
4.08 Total_Team B - dressing room 164 This is the main dressing room for Team B and includes twenty three (23) lockers, flipcharts, white board and clocks.
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
5 Medical Facilities
6 Doping Control
This is the area where players wait to be tested. The doping control room is connected to the waiting room and medical office.
6.01 Total_Waiting room 55
Must contain refrigerator with unopened drinks in plastic bottles, TV and waste bin.
Waiting room - Doping Control facilities S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 8.2.1.2 B3-0081
Doping Control facilities - Doping Control room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 28 8.2.1.1 B3-0083
7 FIFA Offices
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
IT Stadium infrastructure support 2 (close to TCR2) S FFL Lower Plaza B2 18 5.1.12.2 B2-0048
Field of play IT equipment storage S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 23 5.1.12.4 B3-0247
not
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) logistics office P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 70 5.1.15.1
specified
not
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) logistics office P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 25 5.1.15.2
specified
not
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 90 5.1.16.1
specified
Soft drink CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P FFL Lower Plaza West B3 14 14 5.1.16.1 B3-0115
not
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 90 5.1.16.2
specified
Beer CA (Commercial Affiliate) storage room P FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 18 5.1.16.2 B3-0137
FIFA Match Delegates´ Office S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 5.1.24 B3-0093
8 LOC Offices
8.24 Other_Total 60
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
9 Ceremonies
Total_Opening & closing ceremonies Ceremonies requirements will be decided when the ceremony concept is confirmed. Away from public routes and close to player /
9.01 1021
changing rooms (green room) service tunnels.
Opening & closing ceremonies not
P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 620 1.3.1
changing rooms (green room) - male specified
Opening & closing ceremonies not
P Ceremonies Compound (Precinct) 401 1.3.2
changing rooms (green room) - female specified
Area required for opening / closing ceremony rehearsals F&B requirements, holding areas, toilets and sanitary facilities and
Opening / closing ceremonies
9.03 496 800 transport requirements etc. Size of the location dependent on the ceremonies programme. In the Tender Scheme these areas
additional facilities_Total
include the production team office, the set up area and the storage space.
Official Music Artists´ Dressing Room S FFL Lower Plaza B2 346 1.3.11 B2-0053 Official Music Artists' Dressing Room (Tender Scheme brief)
Official Music Artists´ Production Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 104 1.3.12 B3-0249 Official Music Artists' Production Room (Tender Scheme brief)
not not
Ceremony Outdoor line up and holding area 1.3.6
specified specified
10 Merchandise Shops
Temporary kiosks may be required, depending on stadium capacity and existing structures situated at the stadium. Minimum of 8-
10.01 Official merchandise shops / kiosks_Total 0
25 kiosks required of various sizes. Power to be supplied by the stadium to all outlets and surrounding area, must be well lit.
Ideally secure space inside the stadium of minimum 500m² is available. If space or limited space is not available within the
10.02 Merchandise storage_Total 1500
stadium, a space for 6 -12 sea containers (dependent on stadium capacity) is required.
11 Service Compounds
The location of the compound is to support various operations and the storage of goods, i.e. F&B, IT&T, merchandise, logistics, site
management, waste management etc. The layout of the compound(s) should include demacration of areas with security fencing
(2 metres high), dry and cold storage containers and dedicated access gates with sufficient area for simulateous large delivery
11.01 Total_Back-of-house compound 379 vehicles and forklifts. Area should be clear of internal spectator traffic and venue dressing applied to fence lines to conceal the
operation. The compound must have proper ground preparation, drainage, lighting and services. As this area will be erected prior
to/during the non-exclusive use period, a security fence is required pre-, post- and during operations. Power distribution may be
required for refrigerated containers.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
after
Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 53 01-0086
7.1.106
Back of House S FFL Hospitality Club 01 11 01-0087
Ideally, 150% of stadium capacity inventory to be stored in existing facilities. The remaining inventory will be stored in containers
11.02 Total_F&B storage 155 within the stadium perimeter (back of house). It is important that this compound is as close to the stadium as possible. Power to
be supplied by stadium.
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Material storage inside Stadium close to field S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 84 B3-0022
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Staff Toilets, Showers, Prayer facilities, restroom P Logistics Compound (Precinct) 300
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Skyboxes must represent a minimum of 30% of the hospitality programme.Final number of suites and skyboxes to be confirmed by
Skyboxes & Suites S 4029 designer, all to have unobstructed view of FOP.
The Tender Scheme includes 2803 seats in the Skyboxes.
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0001
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0002
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0003
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0004
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0005
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 207 6.1.4.2 02-0006
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0012
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 208 6.1.4.2 02-0013
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0020
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0021
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0028
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 157 6.1.4.2 02-0029
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0044
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0045
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0046
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0047
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0048
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0070
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0071
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0072
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0073
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0074
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 207 6.1.4.2 02-0075
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 208 6.1.4.2 02-0076
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 109 6.1.4.2 02-0077
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 103 6.1.4.2 02-0078
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0079
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 104 6.1.4.2 02-0080
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0081
Hospitality Boxes (Areas) SB FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 105 6.1.4.2 02-0082
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0014
Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0092
Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 1382 6.1.8 01-0041
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 285 6.1.7 01-0008
Lobby - Hospitality - West North S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0010
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Lobby - Hospitality - West South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0018
Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 6.1.7 01-0153
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1625 6.1.7 PL-0043
Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0068
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0075
Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0014
Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 210 6.1.7 02-0092
Lobby - Hospitality - North East S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 1382 6.1.8 01-0041
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 285 6.1.7 01-0008
Lobby - Hospitality - West North S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0010
Lobby - Hospitality - West South S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 212 6.1.7 02-0018
Lobby - Hospitality - North West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 651 6.1.7 01-0153
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1625 6.1.7 PL-0043
Lobby - Hospitality - East South S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0068
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Lobby - Hospitality - South West S FFL Hospitality Club 1 1214 6.1.7 01-0075
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Dependent on size, a second VIP medical room may be required. VVIP medical room required if the VVIP tribune is on a separate
VVIP/VIP medical room(s) S FFL Plaza PL 23 8.2.3 PL-0021 level to the VIP tribune and to be in close proximity to their seating and lifts. Unrestricted access for stretcher-bearers. Minimum
size – 20m². Dedicated doctor to be made available.
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Unobstructed view of pitch. Provided via a temporary construction within the stands or hospitality suite if availabl. Approximately
15.0315.05Total_Presentation studios 307
5m x 5m x 4m with cable pathways, technical power, HVAC, angled window with view of pitch.
Close to player's dressing rooms. Location includes installation and construction, cable pathways, HVAC and both technical and
TV/ Interview Studios S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 53 2.1.8 B3-0042
domestic power to be identified.
Located in route from the player's drop-off to the dressing rooms. Position required for an interview with the team coach on
Coach on Arrival Interview Position S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 18 2.1.9 B3-0034
arrival at the stadium.
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
17 Media Areas–Tribune
Seat allocations, by constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium. The
17.04 Total_Tribune photographers 100
larger quantity required for the opening match, semi-finals and final (100).
Observer seats are without desks and in the proximity of the media tribune’s seats that are without desks. Seat allocations, by
17.05 Total_Observer seats 245
constituent groups, and infrastructure requirements will vary according to the specific event and stadium.
Ticket distribution desk Media Tribune OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 25 3.2.18 One for press, one for photographers.
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Photographers' working room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 260 3.1.4 B3-0030 Final match requires the larger amount (150).
Photographers’ working area OP Stadium Media Centre (Precinct) 419 3.2.13 160 for opening match and final. Dimensions are 1.8m wide x 1.6m
20 Broadcast Compound
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
21 Broadcast Areas
22 Camera Positions
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Camera GHiR
Camera Crane L
Camera Crane R
Camera FGL
Camera UML
Camera FGR
Camera UMR
Playercam (PCL)
Playercam (PCR)
6m left (6mL)
6m right (6mR)
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Microphone Positions
24 IT Technical Areas
Passenger Lifts
Cargo Lifts
Escalators
Giant Video Screens control room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 27 02-0137
Cable pathways
Cable bridge
25 Accreditation Centre
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
26.07 Total_Secure storage 20 The area of 20m² is subdivided in two rooms. The first room is for ticket stock (4m²) the second for hardware (16m²).
27 Volunteer Centre
28 Flagpoles
30 Parking Facilities
30.04 Total_Team guests' parking s 0 Six cars and one bus per team, situated with direct access to the relevant seating allocation within the stadium bow.
30.24 Total_Commercial affiliate non-hospitality 0 Larger amount for the opening match, quarter finals, semi-finals and final.
30.25 Total_Commercial display 4000 Quantity of passes requested depends on activation of commercial display by the commercial affiliates.
Generic Commercial Clients Shuttle Load zone,
P 6.2.101
bays (buses)
Commercial FIFA affiliate hospitality own vehicle Hospitality Parking (Precinct-
P 4000 6.2.102
parking (cars) priority 2)
Commercial FIFA affiliate hospitality own vehicle
P 6.2.102
parking (cars)
Commercial affiliate hospitality own vehicle
P 6.2.103
parking (buses)
Commercial hospitality - (indoor)
Skyboxes/Business seats own vehicle parking S 6.1.101
(buses)
Commercial hospitality - (indoor)
Skyboxes/Business seats own vehicle parking S 6.1.102
(cars)
Commercial hospitality (outdoor) own vehicles
P 6.2.104
parking (cars)
Commercial hospitality (outdoor) own vehicles
P 6.2.105
parking (buses)
Regquired Location Stadium Precinct
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
31 Security Services
This is the hub of the operations in the stadium. Security and disaster management will be handled from the SOC. Uninterrupted
Stadium Control Room (Venue Operation Centre) S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 128 02-0134 view of the pitch and stadium bowl, supplemented by CCTV images of stadium spectators entry and egress pointsw, including the
transport hubs.
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Security Post
Police Station
Security services Transport services Load Zone,
bays (buses)
Security services Transport services parking (cars)
Riot Squad Parlking (50 pax. coaches) P Security Compound (Overlay) 5000
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
To include the following: vehicle queue, vehicle screening area, oversized vehicle screening area, by-pass lane, observation
31.09 Total_Remote search park / vehicle screening P 32
platform, security area (work & break area for screening personnel), material transfer area, toilets, lighting, vehicle permit check.
Ambulance parking P
31.13 Total_Stewards’ holding area 3261 Rest area required for stewards working at the stadium. Area to include lockers, toilets and sanitary facilities, F&B facilities, etc.
Secure Stage and Print Room S FFL Hospitality Sky Boxes 2 18 02-0154
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Spectators checkpoints near every entry point P Security Compound (Precinct) 8.1.10
Doping Control Waiting Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 27 8.2.1.2 B3-0081
Total_Corridor 3233
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Primary technical area (PTA) 1 S FFL Lower Plaza B2 214 10.1.1.1 B2-0029
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Local technical areas (LTA) in the Volunteer Centre P Volunteer Centre (Precinct)
IT Command Centre
CATV Support
CATV storage
Radios 10
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
MoI Communication Network Room S FFL Lower Plaza West B3 142 B3-0002
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Proposal
(S) Stadium
Reference Tender
(SB) Seating Bowl Tender Tender
Tender Scheme Tender (for colour Scheme
Nº Space (IP) Inner Perimeter Tender Scheme Location Scheme Scheme Notes
Level Scheme No. identificati room
(OP) Outer Perimeter Area m2 Area m2
on) & Number
(P) Precint
notes
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
PROJECT TITLE : LUSAIL STADIUM PROJECT
SUBJECT: PLUMBING SYSTEM ( REQUIRED PLANT SPACES ) BASED ON CURRENT & VE OPTION DESIGNS
BASED ON CURRENT DESIGN BASED ON VE OPTION DESIGN
PITCH IRRIGATION WATER
1 SATELLITE CONDENSATE WATER TANK WT 6 GRP
SUPPLY
PLANT RING
Due to HVAC load reduction as
B1/B2/B4 6m x 4m 24 20 480 15 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 5m x 3m 15 10 150 10
part of VE.
PITCH IRRIGATION WATER
2 CONDENSATE RECYCLING BOOSTER PUMP SETS CDPS N/A
SUPPLY
PLANT RING
MAIN KITCHEN AREA/DRESSING
5 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
ROOMS,ETC.
PLANT ROOM PLANTS(P1) 8m x 6m 48 2 96 600 7m x 5m 35 2 70 540
LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH)
6 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A FIELD OF PLAY(CHANGING AREA) PLANT ROOM B1/B3 8m x 4m 32 4 128 100 6m x 4m 24 2 48 80
7 N/A
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY AND
11 NON ‐ POTABLE WATER STORAGE TANK WT‐02 1200 CONCRETE
PITCH IRRIGATION
PLANT ROOM
Non‐potable water storage tank
capacity still to be confirmed due
12 NON ‐POTABLE WATER BOOSTER PUMP SETS WBS‐02 N/A DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY PLANT ROOM B2 35m X 20m 700 1 700 114 LEVEL ‐ 0 (PITCH) 35m x 20m 700 1 700 100 to new occupancy requirement.
Refer to Stage ‐ Design Analysis
Table.
NON ‐ POTABLE WATER
13 WATER TREATMENT PLANT WTP N/A
STORAGE TANK
PLANT ROOM
PITCH IRRIGATION WATER
14 PITCH IRRIGATION WATER STORAGE TANK WT‐03 324 CONCRETE
SUPPLY
PLANT ROOM
PITCH IRRIGATION WATER
16 WATER TREATMENT PLANT WTP N/A
SUPPLY
PLANT ROOM
ZONE ALLOCATED AS FUTURE PLANT ALLOWANCE TO ACCOMMODATE PLANT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE
17 ALTERNATIVE RECYCLED WATER SOURCES IN LINE WITH CLIENT WATER STRATEGY.
FUTURE PROVISION PLANT ROOM B2 20m x 20m 400 1 400 110 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 20m x 20m 400 1 400 110
18 N/A
19 BACK OF WALL DRAINAGE SUMP BWDS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2 8m x 7m 56 4 224 20 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 8m x 7m 56 4 224 20
20 DRAINAGE SUMP PUMP DS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2/B4 5m x 4m 20 12 240 30 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 5m x 4m 20 6 120 25
22 FIRE FIGHTING WATER SUMP PUMP LPS N/A DRAINAGE SYSTEM PLANT RING B2 8m x 7m 56 6 336 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 8m x 7m 56 6 336 Part of FP
Potable Water Distribution
23 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM B3/B1 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 LEVEL‐0(PITCH) 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
4800 3952
LEVEL ‐
Potable Water Distribution
26 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P1) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 2(HOSPITALITY/VVIP/VI 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
P)
LEVEL ‐
Potable Water Distribution
27 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P1) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 2(HOSPITALITY/VVIP/VI 6m x 4m 24 4 96 65
P)
256 144
LEVEL ‐ 3(SKY
Potable Water Distribution
28 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CCW N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 BOXES/HOSPITALITY/V 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
VIP/VIP)
LEVEL ‐ 3(SKY
Potable Water Distribution
29 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 BOXES/HOSPITALITY/V 6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
VIP/VIP)
256 192
Potable Water Distribution
30 CALORIFIERS AND CHILLED WATER BUFFER VESSELS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 4m 32 2 64 35 LEVEL ‐ 4(PLANT) 6m x 4m 24 2 48 30
Potable Water Distribution
31 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75 LEVEL ‐ 4(PLANT) 6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
256 192
Potable Water Distribution LEVEL ‐ 5 (UPPER
32 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 1)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
Potable Water Distribution LEVEL ‐ 6 (UPPER
33 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 2)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
Potable Water Distribution LEVEL ‐ 7 (UPPER
34 DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS CAL N/A
System
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P2) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 75
CONCOURSE 3)
6m x 6m 36 4 144 65
ROOF AREA(CLEANING
35 ROOF CLEANING TANK AND PUMP ROOM N/A
PURPOSES)
PLANT ROOM PLANT(P5) 8m x 6m 48 4 192 30 LEVEL ‐ 8 (PLANT) 6m x 6m 36 4 144 25
Note: These reductions in area for
spaces and power requirements
under VE option design are
6592 1866 5272 1632 approximately based on the 20%
reduced area made for VE
design(173,147 m2) against
current design(212,328 m2).
Sketch #
22 3 3
20 Electrical Spaces
19
ELV Spaces
STA
STA
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
ns
tio
ica PTA 1
un r
m rie
lc om Car om
Te Ro 1
Fire Fighting
1/2 3 1/2 23 1/2 20 1/2 spaces
3
Vertical Circulation
1/2 1/2
20 5 SECURITY
CONTROL
Service Tunnel
ROOM
Tank STA
Fire
fighting
Pump Emergency
room Tank
1/2 1/2 Lighting
STA
Emergency
Lighting
Plumbing
19 / Fire
fighting
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
1/2 1/2
3 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 (3x)
Plumbing Plumbing Radio
/ Fire / Fire Equipment
22 22
3
19
1/2 1/2
4
Emergency
Lighting
STA
STA
Emergency
Lighting
1/2 1/2
22
6 22
20 5 FIRE
COMMAND
CENTER
CAR Room
1/2 1/2
Te
lco
1/2 24 1/2 23 1/2 1/2
20 m
m
Ca un
Ro rrie icat
o r ion
2 m s
PTA
2
Cellular
Equipment
Room
CNR
(MoI) STA
STA
20
22 19
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
STA
STA
Electrical Electrical
ELV Spaces
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
24 25 25 24
Electrical Electrical STA
STA
STA STA
Electrical Electrical
25 25
Elect
rical rical
Elect
STA STA
GIA: 14970 m2
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
Electrical Electrical
ELV Spaces
VENUE
OPERATION
CENTER HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
Vertical Circulation
Service Tunnel
27
Electrical
STA 27 Electrical STA
26
26
STA
27 STA
27
Electrical Electrical
Elect
rical rical
Elect
GIA :14250 m2
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
STA
STA
Electrical Electrical
ELV Spaces
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
28 29
Electrical Electrical
29
29
Electrical Electrical
28 29
Elect
rical rical
Elect
STA STA
GIA:11284 m2
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
Electrical
VOC
Electrical ELV Spaces
SUPPORT
FACILITY
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
Electrical Electrical
Emergency
Lighting
31 31 Emergency
Lighting
30 30
Emergency
Lighting
31 31 Emergency
Lighting
Electrical Electrical
Elect
rical rical
Elect
GIA: 4888 m2
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Electrical
Electrical Spaces
ELV Spaces
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
32 32
32 32
STA STA
Electrical Electrical
Elect
rical rical
Elect
GIA: 16702 m2
0 10 m 50m 100m
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
ELV Spaces
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
Vertical Circulation
Service Tunnel
33 33
STA STA
Electrical Electrical
Electrical
Electrical
STA STA
33 33
GIA: 6593 m2
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
By Department
ELV Spaces Legend
Spectator area_Ancillary
Spectator area_Concourse
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
Vertical Circulation
Service Tunnel
STA STA
Electrical Electrical
34 34
34 34
Electrical
Electrical
STA STA
GIA: 4065 m2
Sketch #
Electrical Spaces
ELV Spaces
HVAC Spaces
Plumbing Spaces
Fire Fighting
spaces
35 35
Radio Radio
Electrical Electrical
Lighting Lighting
Control Control
Room Room
Sketch Space
MEP
Level-0,
# Pitch
Planning
Electrical
ELV
HVAC Spaces
Spaces
Spaces
Plumbing
Fire
spaces
Fighting
Spaces
Vertical Tunnel
Service Circulation
Lighting Lighting
Control Control
Room Room
Electrical
Electrical
Radio Radio
35 35
PROJECT LUSAIL STADIUM Sheet No 3 Rev 1
1. The roof drain and vertical pipe sizing is in accordance with IPC 2006, table 1106.2 and primary storm drain considered in the calculation.
in accordance with IDF curves at Doha International Airport for 50 years @ 15 minutes duration.
2. The runoff calculations for roof is in accordance with ASPE handbook using the formula below :
Q = CIA/(1000 x 3600)
Where:
Q = Runoff in m³/s A = Total Roof Area ,m²
C = Runoff coefficient=0.95 for roof 1000 = Conversion factor, mm to meters
I = Rainfall intensity, mm/hr from IDF Curve 3600 = Conversion factor, hours to seconds
PIPE SIZE AND RUNOFF CALCULATION TABLE BASED ON 100 YEARS RETURN PERIOD
Vertical Pipe & Projected Area Capacities (IPC, Table 1106.2)
Runoff, m³/s
(A) Roof Projected (1) Numbers of Roof Drain
Location (I) Rainfall intensity, Duration, Remarks
Area, m² Used(Primary ) (3)Area Capacity (B)Total Area Capacity Velocity of
(2) Dia, mm mm/hr from IDF minutes from Total Flow(Q) Flow per VL
per VL, m² of VL Used, m² = (1) x(3) pipe/VL (m/s)
curve IDF curve
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐1 design.
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐2 design.
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐3 design.
PROJECT
LUSAIL STADIUM
DOCUMENT ESTIMATED WATER & SEWAGE DEMAND(BASED ON VE DESIGN) 2016-06-30
Qatar Office
5044
RFS 30-Jun-16
Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Program Number of Occupants
Level SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
Group per IBC
Note: Tank size per VE of 1,152 m3 as estimated above is lesser by 30% than the
current design of 1,720 m3.
Initials Division
Design
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - VE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev
ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Potable cold water supply) By Date
A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.
1 PLAYERS/FOP 37658 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 22.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 105.00 2.80 - - 105.00 2.80 Flush Valves
LOWER
2 15171 0 20 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 130.00 3.30 - - 130.00 3.30 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE
HOSPITALITY &
3 14608 0 20 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 170.00 3.70 - - 170.00 3.70 Flush Valves
VIP
4 SKYBOX & VVIP 11698 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 67.00 2.40 - - 67.00 2.40 Flush Valves
5 PLANT & CORES 5912 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 61.50 2.00 - - 61.50 2.00 Flush Valves
UPPER
6 17581 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 70.00 2.20 - - 70.00 2.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 1
UPPER
7 6951 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 65.00 2.30 - - 65.00 2.30 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 2
UPPER
8 4423 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 64.00 2.20 - - 64.00 2.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 3
9 PLANT 4216 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 21.00 1.30 - - 21.00 1.30 Flush Valves
Sub-total 22.20
Add 10% Allowance 24.42
Comments
ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Non-potable cold water supply) By Date
A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.
1 PLAYERS/FOP 37658 100 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.50 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 650.00 9.40 - - 650.00 9.40 Flush Valves
LOWER
2 15171 50 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 337.00 5.50 - - 337.00 5.50 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE
HOSPITALITY &
3 14608 30 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 240.00 4.60 - - 240.00 4.60 Flush Valves
VIP
4 SKYBOX & VVIP 11698 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 190.00 4.20 - - 190.00 4.20 Flush Valves
5 PLANT & CORES 5912 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 92.50 2.40 - - 92.50 2.40 Flush Valves
UPPER
6 17581 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 190.00 4.20 - - 190.00 4.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 1
UPPER
7 6951 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 125.00 3.40 - - 125.00 3.40 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 2
UPPER
8 4423 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 112.00 3.20 - - 112.00 3.20 Flush Valves
CONCOURSE 3
9 PLANT 4216 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 33.00 1.40 - - 33.00 1.40 Flush Valves
245
Sub-total 38.30
Add 10% Allowance 42.13
Comments
5044
RFS 30-Jun-16
Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Program Number of Occupants
Level SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
Group per IBC
Note: Tank size per VE of 1,152 m3 as estimated above is lesser by 30% than the
current design of 1,720 m3.
Initials Division
Design
PROJECT LUSAIL STADIUM Sheet No 3 Rev 1
1. The roof drain and vertical pipe sizing is in accordance with IPC 2006, table 1106.2 and primary storm drain considered in the calculation.
in accordance with IDF curves at Doha International Airport for 50 years @ 15 minutes duration.
2. The runoff calculations for roof is in accordance with ASPE handbook using the formula below :
Q = CIA/(1000 x 3600)
Where:
Q = Runoff in m³/s A = Total Roof Area ,m²
C = Runoff coefficient=0.95 for roof 1000 = Conversion factor, mm to meters
I = Rainfall intensity, mm/hr from IDF Curve 3600 = Conversion factor, hours to seconds
PIPE SIZE AND RUNOFF CALCULATION TABLE BASED ON 100 YEARS RETURN PERIOD
Vertical Pipe & Projected Area Capacities (IPC, Table 1106.2)
Runoff, m³/s
(A) Roof Projected (1) Numbers of Roof Drain
Location (I) Rainfall intensity, Duration, Remarks
Area, m² Used(Primary ) (3)Area Capacity (B)Total Area Capacity Velocity of
(2) Dia, mm mm/hr from IDF minutes from Total Flow(Q) Flow per VL
per VL, m² of VL Used, m² = (1) x(3) pipe/VL (m/s)
curve IDF curve
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐1 design.
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐2 design.
Stadium(North 11,200 1 500 11500 100 15 11500 0.2956 0.2956 37.65 Acceptable, (B) is greater than (A). Pipe size of 500 mm diameter is is acceptable for the VE
Stand)‐NRWP‐3 design.
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Milestone 4
A-5.3 Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
and Psychometric charts (7 Pages)
A-5.5 HVAC System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design (5
Pages)
Milestone 4
Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person Total (L/s) Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person Total (L/s) Function Tier Area Capacity Each Person Total (L/s)
(L/s) (L/s) (L/s)
The original design is based on summer condition 25 l/s per spectator results is over cooling in some area due to over design conditions. The
design checks indicate based on winter condition, we expect to reduce the flow rate for the spectator areas the CFD model will be based on
the 10 L/s per person for lower tier, 20 L/s per person for mid‐tier and no cooling for upper tier.
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.
Air
Occupants Total Air flow based on Air Rate based Total Total Pantry / Battery Repair Total
Occupancy change Make up General Toilet Total Make up
Sr. Area based on Proposed no. of People on Area Outside Air Proposed Kitchen Room Room Proposed Remarks
Space per 100 m2 per hr air Extract Air Extract Extract Air Outside air
No Arch. Dwg's Occupants Outside Air Extract Air Extract Air Extract Air Extract
Rp Ra Ra+Rp
m² No. No. l/s/p l/s l/s/m2 l/s ACH l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s l/s
1 Floors
00 - Players / FOP 33589.8 30.0 1119.7 3.8 4254.7 0.3 10076.9 14331.6 14331.6
01 - Lower Concourse 14970.0 30.0 499.0 3.8 1896.2 0.6 8982.0 10878.2 10878.2
02 - Hospitality & VIP 14250.5 30.0 475.0 3.8 1805.1 0.6 8550.3 10355.4 10355.4
03 - Skybox & VVIP 11284.3 40.0 282.1 3.8 1072.0 0.6 6770.6 7842.6 7842.6
05 - Upper Concourse 1 16702.3 30.0 556.7 3.8 2115.6 0.6 10021.4 12137.0 12137.0
06 - Upper Concourse 2 6592.5 30.0 219.8 3.8 835.1 0.6 3955.5 4790.6 4790.6
07 - Upper Concourse 3 4065.0 30.0 135.5 3.8 514.9 0.6 2439.0 2953.9 2953.9
Tier - 1
1 Assumed Spectator People 30000.0 3.0 90000.0 90000.0 90000.0
Tier - 2
1 Assumed Spectator People 10000.0 3.0 30000.0 30000.0 30000.0
Tier - 3
1 Assumed Spectator People 50000.0 3.0 150000.0 150000.0 150000.0
Appendix - A A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for
Appendix - A
Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load Calculation for
Calculation Title 16-5044 Calculation Title Preliminary A/C Load 16-5044
Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & 27.0WB
Calc. by Date Check by Date Calc sheet no. rev
Calc. by Date Check by Date Calc sheet no. rev
Mani 30/7/2016 KT 30/7/2016 M - 201/R00 MS 30/7/2016 KT 30/7/2016 M - 201
2 Outside Air Cooling Coil Calculation 3790.67 01 - Lower Concourse 14969.96 1 14970.0 100.0 1497.0
(Back and Front of House)
02 - Hospitality & VIP 14250.48 1 14250.5 120.0 1710.1
3 Play Areas 4742.02
03 - Skybox & VVIP 11284.35 1 11284.3 120.0 1354.1
4 Lower Tier Spactator Cooling 12137.40
04 - Plant TBD & Cores 4888
5 Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP Cooling 1632.33
05 - Upper Concourse 1 16702.33 1 16702.3 100.0 1670.2
8 Total Cooling Load 52044.59 07 - Upper Concourse 3 4064.988 1 4065.0 100.0 406.5
08 - Plant TBD 0
9 Total Cooling Load with 5% contingency 54,646.82 Kw
4811.5 Tons
1256.5
Say 2000.0 Kw
Rev 1 BPG121_F01(Excel)
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. 300.03 3.537 2.566 0.016160 83.33 Enthalpy at ON Coil condition
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load 285.66 1.449 1.415 0.008807 35.36 Enthalpy at OFF Coil condition
Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB 287.45 1.628 1.445 0.008998 39.95
& 27.0WB
Calculation Title Back & Front Of House OA AHU Sizing
Calc. ref. Calc sheet no. rev The calculations have been undertaken to estimate the change in chiled water flow given different efficiencies for the
Calc. by Date Checked by Date heat recovery wheels. The formulas used on the sheet are taken directly from ASHRAE Guide S44.
MS 30/7/2016 30/7/2016 The attached psychometric chart indicates the relative difference in efficiency and also identifies the location for some of
Back & Front Of House OA AHU Sizing the readings that have to be completed on these excel calculation sheets.
UNIT REFERENCE :
LOCATION : The electric reheat coil duty is calculated on the basis of no other reheat device such as a wrap-around heat pipe. The
required temperature of the outdoor air is typically set at 17°C/75% to ensure the outdoor air is dehumidified when it is
injected into the occupied space.
Required Supply Air Condition
Volume 65.000 Cu.m.
Temperature 13.00 Deg.C DB. WBT 12.50 Deg.C WB.
Specific Enthalpy 35.36 kJ/kg. Density 1.22 kg/Cu.m.
Outside Air Intake Condition
Outside air Volume 72.500 Cu.m.
DBT 46.0 Deg.C DB. WBT 30.0 Deg.C WB.
Specific Enthalpy 98.95 kJ/kg. Density 1.08 kg/Cu.m.
Enthalpy Calculation
wbK Ps Pv g H
Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref. Project Lusail Stadium, Doha, Qatar Job ref.
A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load A-5.3, Preliminary HVAC Cooling Load
Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB & Appendix - A Calculation for Winter Mode. @ 30.4 DB &
27.0WB 27.0WB
Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation Calculation Title AHU Sizing Calculation
Field Of Play Calc sheet no. rev Lower Tier - Spactator areas Calc sheet no. rev
Calc. by Date Checked by Date Calc. by Date Checked by Date
MS 30/7/2016 MS 30/7/2016
CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY
Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C
Outside Air / Person 90.0 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C Outside Air / Person 308.5 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C
Total Outside Air 90.000 cu.m/s Total Outside Air 154.24 cu.m/s
SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION
Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw
Room Temperature (wet bulb) 22.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0 Room Temperature (wet bulb) 22.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0
Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00 Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00
R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 % R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 %
Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00 Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00
Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg.C Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 28.5 deg.C
Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 24.5
Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C
Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP Upper Tier - Perimeter Cooling
Mid Tier - Sky Box & VVIP 2295 People x 20 L/s / Person 45.9 Cu.m/s Tier -01 400 L/s x 847 m = 338.8 Cu.m/s
CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY CALCULATED HEAT GAINS SAFETY FACTOR -% 0 HEAT GAINS WITH SAFETY
Occupancy O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C Occupancy persons O.A. Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg. C
Outside Air / Person 23.0 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C Outside Air / Person 338.8 L/s O.A. Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0 deg. C
Total Outside Air 22.95 cu.m/s Total Outside Air 338.800 cu.m/s
SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUPPLY AIR FLOW RATE CALCULATION
Room Temperature (dry bulb) 26.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw Room Temperature (dry bulb) 30.0 deg.C Lighting Load 0.00 Kw
Room Temperature (wet bulb) 20.5 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0 Room Temperature (wet bulb) 24.0 deg.C Lighting gain To Void 0.0
Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00 Room Relative Humidity 60.0 % Total Lighting Gain 0.00
R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 % R.A. Void Rise 0.50 deg.C Roof Load To Void 0.00 %
Recirculating Temp. 26.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00 Recirculating Temp. 30.5 deg.C Total Light/Roof Gain 0.00
Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 28.5 deg.C Mixed Temp. (dry bulb) 30.4 deg.C
Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 23.8 Mixed Temp. (wet bulb) 27.0
Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C Fan & Duct Gain 1.00 deg.C
Back of Bowl_S-N
62319
Back of Bowl_E-W
49121
Level 7 - CONCOURSE UPPER 3 Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
44121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 6 - CONCOURSE UPPER 2
39121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 5 - CONCOURSE UPPER 1
34122
Level 4 - PLANT NO COOLING WILL BE
29121 PROVIDED FOR VOID
SPACE. (BETWEEN Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 3 SKYBOXES VVIP CONCOURSE AND
24121 FACADE)
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 2 - HOSPITALITY
19121
Spot Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 1 - CONCOURSE LOWER
13121
Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's Cooling Via AHU's / FCU's
Level 0 - Pitch
6000
CEILING MOUNTED AIR HANDLING UNITS FLOOR MOUNTED AIR HANDLING UNITS
LOCATED AT LEVEL- 02 AREAS TO SERVE VVIP / LOCATED AT LEVEL- 00 AREAS TO SERVE PITCH /
SKY ZONES. CONCOURSE ZONES.
TOTAL AIR FLOW = 45.9M3/s PITCH - TOTAL AIR FLOW = 90.0 M3/s
TOTAL AHUS = 40 NOS. PITCH - TOTAL AHUS = 10 NOS.
CONCOURSE - TOTAL AIR FLOW = 308.48 M3/s
E-W SECTION
CONCOURSE - TOTAL AHUS = 100 NOS.
1 1 : 600
A-5 VE of HVAC Engineering and Code Compliance
A-5.4, HVAC - Plant Location (SECTION)
PROJECT NUMBER : 5044
A-5.5 HVAC SYSTEM ( REQUIRED PLANT SPACES ) BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN & VE OPTION DESIGNS
Lower Plaza West (B3) LEVEL - B3 Nil 20875 0 No Plant Room for HVAC
Lower Plaza (B2) LEVEL - B2 ETS Room All Areas ETS Plant Room 21370 3800
Player / FOP LEVEL - 0 ETS Plant Room - 02 ETS All Areas ETS Plant Room 640 North Zone (Perimeter of the building)
Premium Mezzanine/VIP
LEVEL - B1 9920 0 No Plant Room for HVAC
Lounge
Emir Level/Royal suites LEVEL - PL AHU Plant Concourse Cooling AHU Plant Room 14504 12000
Upper tier (04) LEVEL - 04 AHU Plant Upper Tier cooling AHU Plant Room 8016 8016
Page 1 of 2
PROJECT NUMBER : 5044
A-5.5 HVAC SYSTEM ( REQUIRED PLANT SPACES ) BASED ON ORIGINAL DESIGN & VE OPTION DESIGNS
Note : The Blue marked is the original design and Green marked is revised design.
Page 2 of 2
ETS ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
ETS ROOM
AHU'S ROOM AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
AHU'S ROOM
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 50 000 100 000
1 : 1000
No
Project Title
LUSAIL STADIUM
Drawing Title
Drawing No
A3
227200 227400 227600 227800 228000 228200 228400 228600
25/01/2016 11:46:02
°
! Legend
Site Boundary
Precinct Boundary
3.000
00
3.5
Fuel Tanks*
408200
0
50
2.
AD
OAD
3.500
RO
R
ALT
AS PH
00
HALL 3.0
REST
RO
R AD
OAD 3.0
ALT 00
AS PH 00 3.0
3.000
K
AC
3.000
TR
3.5
00
3.500
3.500
3.50
0
0
3.50
0
50
3.5
00
3.
3.
00
2.500
K 3.0
AC
0
00
TR
00
4. 3.500 3.
50
0
4.000
3.500
00
408000
3.0
4.500
3.0
00
4.0
00 4.000
4.0
0
4.00
00
4.000
3.5
AD
OAD
0
RO
R
4.50
ALT
AS PH
4.0
00
4.0
00 3.500
00
00
00
4.000
4.000
4.0
5.0
AS
PH
A LT
RO
4.500
0
4.000
4.00
AD
00
4.00
0
4.5
00
4.000
00 4.500
6.0 5.5 STR UC
TI ON
C ON
4.
UN DER
AR EA
00
00
0
5.5
6.500 3.50
4.000
0
4.000
0 6.000
00
00
7.
4.0
00
4.500
4.500
5.0
00 4.5
5.000
7.0 00
0
4.50
0
50
4.000
6.
4.000
GALFAR CAMP
0
4.500
00
3.50
00
4.0
00
3.5
3.000
3.000
3.5
7.50
3.
00
0
50
407800
5.5
0
00
4.500
4.000
7.5
4.000
00
6.0
3.5
00
3.500
00
00 4.500
7.0
4.5
Notes:
5.000
4.000
00
00 0
00
4.5
00 3.500
4.000
image dated 27-10-2016
3.5
00
4.0
3.5
MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE 00
00
4.0
0
50
4.0 0
TRA C
K 50 0
5.
00 4. 4.00
00
6.0
3.500
P0 2016-01-25 SB CB CB
4.5 4.0 4.5
00 00 00
00
5.0
3.500
4.500 4.000
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
0
3.500
00
0
00 50
50 4.500
5.5 4.
4. K
4.5
4.00
TRA C
0
50 0
4.
00
4.5 5.000 5.5 00 5.0
0
00 4.5
00
00 0 5.0
0
4.50
5.
50 00 5.000 00 4.500
5. 4.5
5.000 5.000
6.000 Metres
407600
5.
50
0 65 130 260
4.500
5.0 0
00 00
6.0
0
4.00
0
6.
5.00
50
6.0
00
0
6.500
0
50
5.
0
AS PHA
5.00
00
MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE 00
5.
7. 6.500
5.0
00
LT R
0
7.00
0
5.500
ROA
OAD
5.000
4.500
5.500
D
0
00
7.50 0
6.
0 5.50
7.000
5.500 6.00
0
0
00
3.500
5. 6.500
5.500
00
7.5
0
50
5.500
5.0
6.
00
4.000
00
00
5.0
5.5 6.5
TRAC
0
6.00
00
00
7.50
0 00
5.
6.
00
7.000
7.0
K
00 4.5
50
5.0
0
0
00
MATERI AL ST OCKPI LE
00
0
6.0
Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3PL
50
00
5.
3.5
0
6.
50
4.50
0 Tel +44 (0) 191 261 6080 Fax +44 (0) 191 261 7879
00 www.arup.com
6.5
7.00 4.0
6.000
00
0 7.500
00
6.000
5.0
4.500
7.5
Client
407400
00
00
4.0
3.500
AD
00
RO
R OAD
7.000 0 ALT
5.00
Supreme Committee
AS PH
00
7.0
6.0 00
00
6.000 5.5 0
6.5
00
4.500
4.
7.0
5.000
0
5.500
6.50
00
7.0
6.5
5.000
00
00
0
00
6.5
6.
00
0
50
0
5.00
7.000
5.
7.000
7.5
0
3.50
00
4.000
Job Title
00
6.500
7.0
0
50
7.
Lusail Stadium
00
5.000
4.5
7.00
7.0
00
0
6.5
00
00
00
00
4.
0 HBK C AMP
7.50
6.0
5.5
0
00
0
0
50
00
00
6.5
7.
7.
7.
0
00
5.
7.500
4.500
00
6.0
407200
00
5.500
7.5
0
00 7.0
8. 00
00
Site Layout
6.0 RO
R AD
OAD
00
ALT
AS PH
00
AS PHA
6.5
00
7.0
7.5
LT R
ROA
OAD
7.50
D
7.500 0
0
8.50
00
8.0
8.000 00
8.0
Scale at A3
1:5,000
8.500 9.0
00
00
00
8.5
RO
R AD
OAD
ALT
8.5
AS PH
8.5
9.000
240601 Information
00
8.0
9.000
00
Figure No Issue
8.5
407000
2 I1
0
50
9.000
8.
25/01/2016 10:57:35
°
! Legend
Site Boundary
Precinct Boundary
Indicative location of Former Woqod Fuel
Tanks*
408200
-6.9 - -6.0
BH-4002
-5.25
-5.9 - -5.0
BH-4031
-5.46
-4.9 - -4.00
408000
BH-4041
BH-4021
-4.98 -5.96
BH-4019
-5.43
BH-4006 BH-4047
BH-4023 -6.24 -6.46
-5.53
BH-4032
-6.62
Notes:
407800
P0 2016-01-25 SB CB DP
BH-4051
BH-2010 -7.16
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
-6.38
BH-4043 Metres
BH-2007 -6.85
407600
BH-2006 BH-2002
-5.95 -6.07
Client
407400
BH-4035
Supreme Committee
BH-2012 -7.16
-6.66
Job Title
BH-4010 BH-4029
-8.06 -9.36
Lusail Stadium
Scheme Stage Geo-Environmental Report
BH-4018
-7.52
407200
BH-4026
-7.81
Scale at A3
1:5,000
Job No Drawing Status
240601 Information
Figure No Issue
407000
6 I1
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Power Utilities Layout Plan
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1500
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Potable Water Utility Layout Plan
Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1501
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Irrigation Utility Layout Plan
Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1502
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed District Cooling Utility Layout Plan
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1503
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Telecommunications Utility Layout Plan
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1504
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Storm Drainage Utility Layout Plan
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1505
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Foul Drainage Utility Layout Plan
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1506
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Legend
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Access Routes to Stadium Transformer Rooms
Arup IB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
The area shown hatched in grey is excluded from the 1 : 2000
scope of these works and should not be considered. Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1507
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Proposed Fire Hydrant Layout Plan
Arup PM AJ
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1509
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 50 000 100 000
1 : 1000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Utility Works Beyond Stadium and Plaza Boundary
(Blue Line)
Purpose of Issue Seal Date
Arup CH DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1511
pspace
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100 000 200 000
1 : 2000
General Notes
1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
schedules, reports, specifications and documentation.
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
No Description
SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Project Title
Civils
Street Lighting Plan
Arup CB DC
Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 2000
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-1007
(FOR CIVIL DEFENSE USE)
21.00
Copyright by the Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy ( SC). All rights reserved. This document may not,
in whole or in part, be reproduced, stored, transmitted or distributed in any form or by any means, whether
electronic, mechanical, by photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SC.
Except where otherwise expressly agreed in writing by SC, SC shall have no responsibility or liability for any
loss (direct, consequential or otherwise) which may arise from reliance on or use of this document or the
information contained therein.
TRUE
NORTH
Z5
Z1 Z2
Z3 Z4
MECCA Z6
0 100
10
12
50
25
5
21000
6 500
000
500
250
000
500
000 100
200
10
12
50
20
25
51000
2000
000
000
500
000
111::2000
1000
:125
500
200
250
100
50
10
20
General Notes
Typical Road Section A - A 1. All drawings to be read in conjunction with all relevant architectural and engineering drawings as well as all other
2. All material and workmanship shall comply with Qatar Construction Specifications, the current edition of the
Master Format Specification, all applicable Qatar engineering standards, and any applicable local codes and
regulations. Where any conflict exists, the most onerous is to be implemented.
3. Contractor shall coordinate with all engineering documentation and verify the exact location of all elements prior
to finalisation of design.
4. Drawings are diagrammatic and indicate general arrangement and design intent as appropriate for Schematic
Design. Contractor to develop these principles through detailed design.
Varies (Typical 15.15m) 5. For the CDM Hazard Risk Registers refer to the Health & Safety Plan; document reference
SC-C01-CAF-FOS-PLN-HS-00005.
Footway/Verge Footway/Verge
Varies Varies
(3.075m Typical) Road 3.075m Typical)
7.30
Gravel Strip Shoulder Shoulder Gravel Strip
0.50 0.35 0.35 0.50
PLOT BOUNDARY
PLOT BOUNDARY
Typical Road Section B - B
Two Way, Two Lane Road
PLOT BOUNDARY
PLOT BOUNDARY
2.0 TSE
Scale 1:2500 Typical Road Section D - D
No Description
Two Way, Two Lane Road SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION
Brief details on the identified hazard symbol referencing the unusual residual hazards / risks are listed above.
Varies
Project Manager (logo)
PLOT BOUNDARY
STADIUM BOUNDARY
Project Title
Drawing Title
3.0 Foul Water
Civils
3.0 Comms
1.0 Potable
0.6 Power
0.6 Power
2.4 Power
Utility's shown are not typical of general arraignment but of Typical Cross Sections Sheet 1
2.0 TSE
2.0 TSE
4.0 DC
Arup IB DC
Road D3 Model File Ref: Scale A0 (841x1189) Revision No
1 : 10
Drawing No
REV-T0
C01-FOS-D- CAI-T-CI-AL-AZ-3005
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on
the VE Option design.
A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design
A-13.3 ICT/ ELV System (Required plant spaces) Based on the original and VE Option design
Milestone 4
2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical Domestic Sewage
Supply Fire Fighting Water Supply
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen Water Heater Lift Pumps and Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]
1. Lighting and power systems
1.1 Level
00 ‐ Players / FOP
BROADCAST AREAS 176 8 30 1.408 5.28
CEREMONIES 130 8 20 1.04 2.6
FIFA/LOC offices 1524 8 40 12.192 60.96
MEDIA 1092 8 20 8.736 21.84
MEDICAL FACILITIES 99 8 10 0.792 0.99
PLANT 4077 5 10 20.385 40.77
PLAYING AREA 985 8 10 7.88 9.85
SECURITY SERVICE 3507 8 30 28.056 105.21
SERVICE COMPOUNDS 16202 5 20 81.01 324.04
SERVICE ROAD/TUNNEL 7229 5 5 36.145 36.145
STADIUM SIGN AGE AND DECOR 145 8 5 1.16 0.725
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 3222 8 5 25.776 16.11
VVIP/VIP 60 8 10 0.48 0.6
01 ‐ Lower Concourse
HOSPITAL_ENTRANCE LOBBIES 502 8 10 4.016 5.02
SPECTATOR AREA 7123 8 10 56.984 71.23
SPECTATOR AREA_ANCILLIARY 4955 8 10 39.64 49.55
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 4079 8 10 32.632 40.79
02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP
HOSPITALITY_LOUNGE 5056 8 10 40.448 50.56
HOSPITALLY_ANCILLIARY 4440 8 10 35.52 44.4
VIP_ANCILAY 966 8 10 7.728 9.66
VIP_LOUNGE 1338 8 10 10.704 13.38
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 2920 5 5 14.6 14.6
03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP
HOSPITALLY_SKYBOX & SUITES 12189 8 10 97.512 121.89
04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores
PLANT 6586 5 5 32.93 32.93
VIRTICAL CIRCULATION 2920 5 5 14.6 14.6
05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1
MEDIA 22 8 20 0.176 0.44
SPECTATOR AREA 14571 8 5 116.568 72.855
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1659 8 10 13.272 16.59
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 388 8 10 3.104 3.88
VERTICAL CIRCULATION 2269 5 5 11.345 11.345
06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1528 8 10 12.224 15.28
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 5684 8 10 45.472 56.84
07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3
SPECTATOR AREA ANCILLIARY 1528 8 10 12.224 15.28
SPECTATOR AREA_CONCOURSE 5684 8 10 45.472 56.84
08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 8 5 0 0
1.2 EVENT LIGHTING
Façade Lighting loads 30
Extrenal Lighting loads 462
3. Vertical Transportation
Passenger Elevator‐01 (1S) 240
Passenger Elevator‐02 (2S) 360
Passenger Elevator‐03 (3S) 120
4. Electrical Kitchen (based on the current deign)
Main Kitchen 633.9
VIP lounge (North) 103
VIP lounge (South) 97
VIP lounge(North) 103
VIP lounge(South) 103
Emir Level 140
VVIP lounge (North) 109
Load Estimation ‐ Page: 1
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment
Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Lusail Stadium ‐ Doha Qatar
2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical Domestic Sewage
Supply Fire Fighting Water Supply
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen Water Heater Lift Pumps and Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]
VVIP lounge (South) 97
Sky support Pantries 296
5. Fire Protection system
Fire Pumps 300
Jockey Pump 60
Circulation Pump: 3
6. Plumbing
PUMP SETS 410
WATER SUMP PUMP SETS 71
DOMESTIC HOT WATER CALORIFIERS AND CIRCULATING PUMP SETS 1270
7. HVAC
Chilled Water Pumps 1120
Press. Units 20
Exhaust Fans 150
Air Handling Units 1400
Jet Fans 120
Smoke Fans 800 800
VRF‐DX units 300
8. Miscellaneous
Special Lighting Loads‐By UPS (5 Min.) 850
ELV Equipment ‐ICT / Security‐By Generator 1010.4
ELV Equipment ‐AV ‐By Generator 568.8
ELV Equipment (Emir Suite ‐VOC) ‐ By UPS (5 Min.) 80
ELV Equipment (telecommunication) ‐ By UPS (5 Min.) 300
ELV Equipment ‐ By UPS (60 Min.) 100
Load Category Totals
TCL ‐ Normal (kW) 1364 1343 2820 0 940 950 1682 1270 720 363 410 71 2909
TCL ‐ Essential (kW) 1091 537 987 940 841 432 246 43 2909
Demand Factors ‐ Summer 1 0.75 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.7 1 0.8 0 0.6 0.6 1
MDL ‐ Normal (kW) 1364 1007 2820 0 752 760 1177 1270 576 0 246 43 2909
Formula inside the cell Green
Load Estimation ‐ Page: 2
A13.1 Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment
Preliminary breakdown of the electrical load assessment for Lusail Stadium Based on the VE Option design.
Lusail Stadium ‐ Doha Qatar
2
Power Density (W/m ) Electrical Domestic Sewage
Supply Fire Fighting Water Supply
Area Lighting Sockets Cooling Heating Extract Fans Kitchen Water Heater Lift Pumps and Miscellaneous
Description Fans Equipment Pumps and aux Remarks
(m2) [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] [kW] Appliances and aux [kW] aux [kW]
[kW] [kW] [kW]
Lighting Small Power HVAC [kW] [kW] [kW]
Transformer Selection contingency % (load growth & design)
TCL ‐ Normal (kW) 14842 20 17811 DF
MDL ‐ Normal (kW) 12925 20 15510 0.871
Built Up Area (m²) 124855
Power Density on actual TCL (W/m2) 119
Power Density on contingency TCL (W/m2) 143
Power Density on actual MDL (W/m2) 104
Power Density on contingency MDL (W/m2) 124
Loading % Power Factor
Transformer capacity required (kVA) 19007 80 0.85
Minimum transformer capacity (kVA) 22808 20 % contingency
Actual quantity required without contingency 11.879
Actual quantity required with contingency 14.255
Roundup quantity with contingency 15
Tx Rating (kVA) 1600
Substation required within the project YES
Generator Selection
TCL ‐ Essential (kW) 8026
Power Density on actual TCL (W/m2) 64
% to Normal TCL 54%
Sizing Power Factor
Generator Capacity Required (kVA) 12541 1.25 0.8
Minimum Generator Capacity (kVA) 13795 10 % contingency
Load Estimation ‐ Page: 3
A-13.2 Electrical System (Required plant spaces) based on original and VE design option
Electrical System (Required plant spaces) Based on the current and VE Option design As per VE Design
As per Original Design
As Per Tender Revised
TOTAL
New Area Sq.m Electrical Rooms L (m) W(m) QTY
Floor Level AREA(Sq.m)
Basement (B4) (excl slab under FOP) 00 ‐ Players / FOP 33589.7625 Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 4 5 4 80
Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 4.9 4.85 2 47.53 Electrical room 4 5 4 80
Emergency Lighting Room ‐1 6.25 4.85 2 60.625 Substation 1
Lower Plaza West (B3) Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Electrical room 6 6 2 72 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Substation 1 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.8 7.6 1 59.28 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 13.7 7.9 1 108.23 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.1 4.9 1 44.59 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.6 7.5 1 57 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.3 7.5 1 92.25 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Essential
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 4.9 1 98.98 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Generator room 13.3 6.2 1 82.46 Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.5 7.5 1 56.25 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.6 1 94.24 Life safety (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.5 4.9 1 46.55 Substation 4
LV room 9.2 5.9 1 54.28 Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Life safety (LV room ) 13.2 4.9 1 64.68 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Substation 4 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.7 7.4 1 56.98 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 13.6 7.5 1 102 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 13.6 6.7 1 91.12 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.6 7.4 1 56.24 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.4 1 91.76 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Essential
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20 5 1 100 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Generator room 13.3 5.9 1 78.47 Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.4 7.4 1 54.76 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.6 7.4 1 93.24 Life safety (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5 1 50 Substation 2
LV room 9.2 5.9 1 54.28 Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Life safety (LV room ) 13.6 5 1 68 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Lower Plaza (B2) Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Electrical room 6 6 2 72 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Substation 2 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential
Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 8.4 7.4 1 62.16 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 16.3 7.4 1 120.62 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 21.6 7.6 1 164.16 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 9.1 7.2 1 65.52 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
6.4 7.2 1 46.08 Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Transformer room (TX room ) 4.9 7.2 1 35.28 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
Essential
6.9 7.8 1 53.82 Life safety (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 19.5 4.3 1 83.85 Substation 3
Generator room 14.2 4.4 1 62.48 Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 9.1 7.2 1 65.52 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.2 1 89.28 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
LV room 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Essential
Life safety (LV room ) 9.5 5.1 1 48.45 Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 20.2 5.5 1 111.1
Substation 3 Generator room 10 6 1 60
Non –Essential Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 8.5 7.4 1 62.9 Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7 7.3 1 51.1
Transformer room (TX room ) 16.3 7.4 1 120.62 Transformer room (TX room ) 9.5 5.5 1 52.25
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 21.6 7.5 1 162 Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 10 5.5 1 55
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 9.1 7.1 1 64.61 LV room 10 5.5 1 55
6.4 7.2 1 46.08 Life safety (LV room ) 13.2 5.5 1 72.6
Transformer room (TX room ) 4.9 7.2 1 35.28 01 ‐ Lower Concourse 14969.95631 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Essential
6.9 9.4 1 64.86 02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP 14250.48261 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 14.5 5.1 1 73.95 03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP 11284.34934 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Generator room 13.9 4.5 1 62.55 04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores 4888
Medium Voltage room ( MV room) 7.3 7.2 1 52.56 05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1 16702.3306 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Transformer room (TX room ) 12.4 7.2 1 89.28 06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2 6592.50623 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
Essential –backup Main Low‐Voltage (LV room ) 19.5 4.3 1 83.85 07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3 4064.988449 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 8 128
LV room 9.2 4.3 1 39.56 08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 Electrical room ‐1 4 4 4 64
Life safety (LV room ) 9.8 5.5 1 53.9 Electrical room ‐2 (MCC) 10 5 4 200
Plaza Electrical room ‐1 4.5 4 2 36 Electrical room ‐3 (Lighting control) 10 5 4 200
Electrical room ‐2 6.6 3 1 19.8 4267
Electrical room ‐3 6.6 4 3 79.2 TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.376
Electrical room ‐4 6 3 2 36
Premium Mezzanine/VIP Lounge NIL
Emir Level/Royal suites(RS) NIL
Hospitality Club level (01) Electrical room ‐1 4.4 3.3 4 58.08
Electrical room ‐2 5.4 3.2 2 34.56
Electrical room ‐3 5.4 4 2 43.2
Hospitality Sky Boxes (02) NIL
Plant (P2) Electrical room ‐1 4.6 3 4 55.2
Electrical room ‐2 6.3 4 4 100.8
Upper Tier 03 NIL
Plant 1 (P3) Electrical room ‐1 4.9 4.5 4 88.2
Plant 2 (P4) Electrical room ‐1 15.7 5.4 4 339.12
Upper tier (04) NIL
Plant (P05) Electrical room ‐1 6.2 2.6 4 64.48
4950.775
‐14% Reduction
A-13.3 ICT/ ELV System (Required plant spaces) based on the original design and VE design
ICT/ ELV System (Required plant spaces) Based on the current and VE Option design
VE design Original design
Revised As Per Tender
New Area Sq.m ICT Rooms Floor Level
00 ‐ Players / FOP 33589.76 MOI Communication Network Room 137 TBD Lower Plaza West (B3) MOI Communication Network Room 137
Cellular Equipment Room 159 TBD Cellular Equipment Room 159
Central Apparatus Room - Broadcast 200 TBD Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 200
Telecoms Equipment Room 1 92 TBD Sub‐Comms Room 110
Telecoms Equipment Room 2 92 TBD Central Apparatus Room ‐ Broadcast 200
Main Comms Room 1 210 TBD Lower Plaza (B2) Telecoms Equipment Room 1 92
Main Comms Room 2 210 TBD Telecoms Equipment Room 2 92
Radio Equipment Room 103 TBD Main Comms Room 1 210
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Main Comms Room 2 210
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Radio Equipment Room 103
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 14
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 17
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 17
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 25 5 Plaza Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 26
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 25 5 Sub‐Comms Room 28
Sub-Comms Room 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 28
01 ‐ Lower Concourse 14969.96 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 25
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 26
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 31
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 22
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 26
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Premium Mezzanine/VIP Lounge Sub‐Comms Room 14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Emir Level/Royal suites Sub‐Comms Room 20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Hospitality Club level Sub‐Comms Room 20
02 ‐ Hospitality & VIP 14250.48 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Hospitality Sky Boxes Sub‐Comms Room 14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 18
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 21
03 ‐ Skybox & VVIP 11284.35 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 14
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Plant (P2) Sub‐Comms Room 17
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 29
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room 29
04 ‐ Plant TBD & cores 4888 Sub‐Comms Room 17
05 ‐ Upper Concourse 1 16702.33 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 17
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 29
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 29
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Sub‐Comms Room ‐ (with MOI rack) 17
06 ‐ Upper Concourse 2 6592.506 Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Upper Tier 03
Sub-Comms Room 14 3
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Plant 1 (P3) Sub‐Comms Room 20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 20
07 ‐ Upper Concourse 3 4064.988 Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 20
Sub-Comms Room 14 3 Sub‐Comms Room 21
Sub-Comms Room - (with MOI rack) 20 4 Plant 2 (P4) Sub‐Comms Room 21
08 ‐ Plant TBD 0 External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Sub‐Comms Room 21
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Sub‐Comms Room 21
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Upper tier (04)
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Space 32 Plant (P05) Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 15
Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
Sub‐Comms Room 18
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 32
External Mobile/Radio Equipment Sp 15
TOTAL NIA Base Build 106342.4 1935 2622
26% Reduction
KEO International Consultants Value Engineering
Milestone 4
16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-120
16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-121
16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-122
16009-OPS-XX-XX-SK-123
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
5044
RFS 30-Jun-16
Sewer (Human/Primate
Potable Water
Waste)
Number of Occupants
Item No. SPACE DESCRIPTION Gross Floor Area (m2) Demand(L/seat) Remarks
per IBC
508,250 406,600
Total Domestic Water & Sewage Demand 80,524 508 m3 407 1 DAY
1,017,008
Note: Tank size per Legacy mode of 1,017 m3 as estimated above is almost equal
to the VE design of 1,152 m3.
Initials Division
Design
EGACY MODE LUSAIL STADIUM - LEGACY MODE Sheet No 1 of 1 Rev
ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Potable cold water supply) By Date
A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.
1 OFFICES 22665 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.50 60.00 102.50 2.70 - - 102.50 2.70 Flush Valves
2 CLINICS 17248 0 35 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 17.50 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 137.50 3.40 - - 137.50 3.40 Flush Valves
3 APARTMENTS 18920 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 60 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 50.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 270.00 5.00 - - 270.00 5.00 Flush Valves
4 SCHOOL 21691 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 96.00 121.00 3.00 - - 121.00 3.00 Flush Valves
80524
Sub-total 14.10
Add 10% Allowance 15.51
Comments
ITEM PLUMBING - Probable Water Flow Rates(Non potable cold water supply) By Date
A. REFERENCE
The probable flow rates required for water supply is in accordance with IPC-2003 using the following tables below:
1. Table E 103.3 (2) Load values assigned to fixtures
2. Table E 103.3 (3) - Conversion of fixture units to design flow rates.
1 OFFICES 22665 42 0 0 0 0 48 0 20 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 210.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 60.00 442.00 6.70 - - 442.00 6.70 Flush Valves
2 CLINICS 17248 70 0 0 0 0 86 0 30 0 30 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 129.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 60.00 689.00 10.00 - - 689.00 10.00 Flush Valves
3 APARTMENTS 18920 30 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 60 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 321.00 5.80 - - 321.00 5.80 Flush Valves
4 SCHOOL 21691 100 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 48 5 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 1 5 2.25 2 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 96.00 1246.00 14.00 - 1246.00 14.00 Flush Valves
80524 242
Sub-total 36.50
Add 10% Allowance 40.15
Comments
Milestone 4
Milestone 4
To be provided separately.
Milestone 4
To be provided separately.
Milestone 4