Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANUAL
GUIDELINES, METHODOLOGY & QAP TO CARRYOUT
DPR OF HIGHWAY PROJECTS
Management Representative
Management Representative
Controlled Copy No. HO/SERVER/ISO DOCUMENTS/HM
1.0 Methodology 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Collection and Review of Data 1
1.3 Traffic Surveys 2
1.3.1 Analysis of collected data 6
1.4 Inventory and Condition Surveys 7
1.5 Intersection Inventory Surveys 7
1.6 Inventory and Condition Survey of Cross-drainage Structures 8
1.7 Environmental Evaluation 9
1.7.1 Definition of the Study Area 9
1.7.2 Data Collection 9
1.7.3 Review of Design Concepts 10
1.8 Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) 13
1.9 Engineering Surveys and Investigations 14
1.9.1 Topographic Surveys 14
1.9.2 Hydraulic and Hydrological Studies 22
1.9.3 Assessment of Load Carrying Capacity or Rating of Existing Bridges22
1.9.4 Geological Investigations 22
1.9.5 Identification & Evaluation of Construction Materials & Sources 23
1.9.6 Sub-grade Characteristics and Strength 23
1.9.7 Pavement Condition Survey 24
1.9.8 Pavement Strength Evaluation 24
1.9.9 Pavement Roughness Survey 25
1.10 Design of Highway Pavement 25
1.10.1 Design Standards 25
1.10.2 Geometric Designs 26
1.10.3 Pavement Design 26
1.10.4 Design of High Embankments 26
1.10.5 Design of Intersection Layouts and Grade Separators 26
1.10.6 Design of Ancillary Road Works and Service Roads 27
1.10.7 Rest areas, Wayside Facilities and Weighing Stations 27
1.10.8 Road Furniture, Appurtenances and Landscaping 28
1.10.9 Surplus Land Development 28
1.11 Design of Bridges and Drainage Structures 28
1.12 Road Drainage 29
1.13 Cost Estimates, Economic and Financial Analysis 29
1.13.1 Preparation of BOQ and Cost Estimates 29
1.13.2 Economic Analysis 30
1.13.3 Financial Analysis 32
1.14 Road Safety Audit 34
1.0 Methodology
1.1 General
Highway related Detailed Project Report (DPR) tasks are generally to be carried out in the
following phases:
Stage I: Inception Report;
Stage II. Feasibility Report;
Stage III: Preliminary Project Report (PPR); and
Stage IV: Detailed Project Report (DPR)
The attached diagrams show the break down of tasks to be performed in stage-1 of the
assignment. Each stage is subject to safety audit before proceeding to next stage.
STAGE 1 - INCEPTION REPORT
Mobilization
Inception Report
All available information relating to all possible existing road linkages within project influence
area, registered vehicular growth, circulation pattern of vehicles on the existing road network
and surrounding region, likely future developments in the project influence area are to be
collected and collated. This information is to use either directly or after verification and
supplementation.
The data and information collected for the studies is broadly classified as follows:
Information on existing transportation system in the project influence area;
The traffic survey locations for traffic studies are to be determined after a detailed
reconnaissance survey. Some of the locations selected may be the same as intimated by
concerned government department for their traffic census. Traffic surveys are to
conducted as per the guidelines contained in IRC: 108 – 1996, IRC: SP 19 – 2001, IRC
SP: 41 – 1994, IRC: 102 – 1988 and IRC: 09 – 1972 and as per requirement of TOR. All
surveys will be conducted to meet the requirements of TOR and / or CONTRACT
AGREEMENT. In case of ambiguity between IRC codes and TOR, provision of TOR will
be strictly followed. Duration and frequency of traffic surveys will be as per the TOR.
this survey the users are to be asked to state the level of acceptance for various
toll rates and their views on possible reduction in trips due to imposition of toll. The
collected data is used for identifying the willingness to pay and establishing of
optimum toll rates for various road users. The scenarios in the questionnaire
represented the current speed, Vehicle operating costs and travel time levels with
no improvement / widening and with improvement / widening. All collected data
shall be filled in form (SAI-QF-14HW Rev00). The findings of these surveys are to
be compared to the user fees being collected on other projects in the country.
All collected data shall be filled in form (SAI-QF-17HW Rev00). The above data is
to be used to estimate the parking demand which will be used for designing the
facilities for Truck Terminals.
The above collected data is to be analyzed and traffic surveys and analysis report is to be
prepared depicting the following information:
The condition of the various stretches of the identified road linkages is visually inspected
with a view to broadly classify the road conditions and to prepare a suitable road inventory.
The data is to be collected by field investigation to cover the following aspects:
The data is collected in sufficient detail and presented in tabular and graphical forms,
using an Excel spread sheet.
- Name of Intersection;
- Location of Intersection;
- Type of Intersection i.e. ‘T’ or ‘+’ etc. ;
- Category of arms i.e. NH / SH / MDR / ODR , width and ROW;
- Traffic guidance system at intersection; and
- Cross road(s) connection and its alternative access
- Any development around intersection.
- Land and open space availability for improvement / widening
The inventory for bridges and ROB is prepared. It includes the parameters as per IRC-SP:
35 - 1990 “Guidelines for Inspection and Maintenance of Bridges”. Also, IRC SP:19-2001
“Manual for survey, investigation and preparation of Road Projects will be used.
Inventories are prepared to record the conditions of each major / minor bridge or cross-
drainage structure within the identified sections.
The site inspection of bridges / culverts is done and the features such as type of
structures, span / diameter, width of carriageway, type of substructure, and superstructure
adequacy of waterway collected through dimensional measurement and local inquiries.
Visual observations carried out during the condition survey are mainly to find out the
distresses. In addition to the superstructures, the masonry/concrete substructures are
inspected to locate cracks and loose mortar in joints, especially for pier and abutments.
The wing walls and the return walls will be inspected to locate any separation of these
from the abutment. Any unusual differential settlement, which gives rise to cracks in the
return or wing wall, to be inspected thoroughly.
For any distress observed, the extent or the magnitude plays a vital role and consequently
the extent of the distress needs to be noticed. Thus evaluation of the distress is of
paramount importance. In order to evaluate the distress in the form of a visible entity, it is
necessary to know the reasons or causes of the identified distresses, which is required to
be briefly elucidated.
Certain data such as type of foundation, year of construction, design loading etc. which
can not be obtained by site inspection, is collected from the concerned departments. After
carrying out the initial condition survey, an assessment of the structures is made based on
the findings of condition survey.
Consistent with commonly accepted international standards, the environmental and social
screening assessment is conducted considering potential impacts on physical, biological,
social / economic and cultural resources within approximately 50 m on each side of the
road. The 50m study area is considered adequate for the assessment of most physical
and social effects arising from project development. However, it is also recognized that a
number of potential (positive and negative) impacts could also have effects beyond this
boundary, such as effects on road linkages, employment and community. These are also
to be considered in the screening assessment.
Data is collected from a variety of sources, including published data and topographical
mapping, unpublished information obtained from government agencies, information
obtained from the total station survey of the proposed alignment and field reconnaissance.
During the course of the study following Acts, Guidelines and Notifications are consulted:
Environmental (Protection) Act (1986),
Guidelines for Rail/Road/Highways Projects, Ministry of Environment & Forests,
Government of India (1981)
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974, amended in 1978 & 1988,
Forest (Conservation ) Act 1980, amended in 1988,
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution ) Act 1981, amended in 1988,
Wildelife (Protection Act), 1972
Noise (Control & Regulations) Rules, 2000
Indian Road Congress Publication IRC:104:1988
Notification on EIA of 10th April 1997 of Ministry of Environment & Forests
World Bank source book on Environmental Assessment (1995),
World Bank Operational Policy 4.01 (1999) and
World Bank Technical Document No 376 on Roads and Environment (1997)
Environmental Assessment Requirements of the Asian Development Bank(1998)
Environmental Guidelines for Selected Infrastructure Projects of Asian
Development Bank(1993)
Initial alignment concepts are to be reviewed on 1:50,000 scale base maps for the
following impacts
Each parameter is evaluated from the scales given in annexure III and an evaluation
matrix is prepared as under.
Total 1000
Guidelines for TOR will govern this activity. The report is prepared conforming to the
guidelines of the Government of India and Asian Development Bank (ADB) as
appropriated separately for each construction package.
For preparation of RAP, elaborate formats are adopted. Three steps strategy is followed:
livelihood and other support system of communities as far as possible. Also, identification
of such settlements will help in further conducting full socio-economic and census surveys
and preparing Resettlement Action Plan.
To undertake the preliminary evaluation of highway, personal field visits are to be made all
along the road to ascertain various categories of land uses, properties and economic
activities operating in the stipulated ROW. On both sides of the road, all structures are
counted, their type of use is ascertained, critical sites are identified and mitigation
measures are suggested.
To consult affected public and to count the likely losses, several site visits are to be
performed and positive consultation process is adopted to obtain the views and possible
solutions from the local people, NGOs, and other government officials. Consultation
process is also followed separately with related state and district level officials for
acquainting them about the project and for their possible cooperation in its operation and
execution of Resettlement Action Plan. A reconnaissance survey is undertaken to
ascertain the aspects of the social structure, religious and cultural composition,
occupational pattern, vulnerability of the people, which can not be ascertained through the
secondary sources of data. The sample selection is not scientific but care is to be taken
while selecting people for survey so that the real situation of the area can be ascertained.
Maximum effort is to be made to correctly address the public needs by organizing public
meetings, door-to-door survey and imparting awareness about the proposed development
work. The entire procedure, including draft resettlement plan, is to be made transparent as
far as possible.
Reconnaissance Survey
A reconnaissance survey is to be undertaken after a table study of all maps of the project
area, published by Survey of India at scale of 1:50,000 and satellite imagery obtained from
National Remote Sensing Agency at scale of 1:50,000. Other useful inputs viz. information
on natural resources, geology, geomorphology, land use, soil status, drainage pattern,
forest etc. has been derived form the imageries. Reconnaissance survey is carried out as
per Appendix - 3 of IRC: SP19-2001.
These are located on the edge of the proposed right of way (ROW) at inter-visible
locations at every 5 km.
These are, as far as possible, on either side of 5 km stone so that it can be identified
easily in the field and an arrow painted on the existing road indicating their location.
The stations selected are free from obstruction towards sky at an angle of 15° with
horizontal plane.
The stations are to be established on punch mark and cross lines on plate embedded
in RCC (M15) pillar of size 15 cm x 15 cm x 45 cm embedded in concrete M10 (5 cm
all around) up to a depth of 30 cm and the balance 15 cm above the ground is to be
painted yellow.
For fixing the Primary Control Stations using DGPS, the time of observations at Base
Station is to be minimum 30 minutes and at Reference Stations minimum 20 minutes
or longer if instrument signal does not indicate sufficient data received, to eliminate the
possible projection and time errors in the signals received from various satellites being
observed at respective locations and in order to ensure high accuracy in the
positioning of control stations within + 20 mm.
A minimum of 6 satellites are to be available during observation to ensure high
accuracy.
Secondary control stations are to be established at 2 km intervals using Total Station and
through closed traverse distributed linearly running between two nearest Primary Control
Stations ensuring an accuracy in the order of 12 √k in mm, where ‘k’ is the distance in
kilometres between two primary control stations. Any errors within permissible limits are to
be distributed in a rational manner to establish the accurate and effective horizontal control
grid. These are to be established on reference pillars having configuration similar to
primary control station with an arrow painted on the surface of existing road indicating their
location.
The Temporary Bench Marks are established using high accuracy Digital Level and Bar
coded staff by way of double run levelling in small circuits of 3 km length ensuring an
accuracy in the order of 6 √k mm, where ‘k’ is the distance in kilometres between two
Temporary Bench Marks available in the project area, and error, if any, within permissible
limits is distributed in rational manner to establish the accurate and effective vertical
control grid.
a) Existing Road
In one string, points are to be taken in exact sequence, in one direction only for the
complete section of the project road. All survey teams will follow the same direction.
b) Topography
Embankments (code: EB** for bottom and ER** for top)
Embankment is located opposite the chalk marks and any change of direction or
grade where they run parallel to the road.
When embankments are not parallel to the road, readings at every 25 m or
change of direction or grade were recorded.
While following an embankment that changes direction often the Top and Bottom
readings are recorded next to each other to avoid the lines overlapping.
Underground utilities like optical fibre cable and gas pipeline are to be located in
addition to other utilities. Location of distribution points can be seen over-ground
(Code: OFC*, and GASL*).
c) Structures
Edge of Buildings (Code: BC**)
Corners of buildings closest to the road have to be located.
Hectometre stone (Code: PH**) where ** is number of the stone for the specific
kilometre section
Top centre of the stone has to be located (not to be used for contouring).
At least three points on outer perimeter of the well to be located so that a circle
could be created.
Level Crossing
At level crossing, the railway line at least 400 m on either side of project road is
covered noting layout, level and physical features around the area.
Code: RL**
Lever readings are to be taken on top of rails at 25 m interval on straight and 10 m
interval on curved section. Similarly levels are to be taken on the edge of
formation (Code: EF**) and toe (Code: ET**).
Reading for trees are taken at the side of trees nearest to the road and up to the
R.O.W.
CC00
ES00 ES01
CE00 CE01
PSPL
PSPL ET00 PSPL
Extra width is to be surveyed on the inside of curves and where existing alignment is
poor, in consultation with the Design Engineer.
The edge of road (CE**) strings is stopped before start and end of bridge and is
joined manually.
Levels for Cross sections depending upon the type of cross drainage structures
are taken as under:
(i) For bridge length more than 60 m at 100 m interval and up to 500 m upstream
and downstream.
(ii) For bridge length between 30 m to 60 m and for defined channel at 100 m
interval and up to 200 m upstream and downstream.
(iii) For minor waterway three cross-sections one at bridge center line, 100 m
upstream and downstream.
Survey of the stream / river is extended up to natural grounds level or F.S.L.
bridge wherever within 200 metre from road bridge site upstream and downstream
from bridge. All physical features such as high or low points, trees, existing
temporary or permanent installations on bed, and banks on either side of
approach road are to be recorded.
Natural surface readings are to be recorded about 30 m -50 m beyond the top of
river banks or HFL, whichever is higher.
Wherever possible, from local enquiry or from High Flood marks on adjacent
structures, one reading for HFL is taken and L WL is identified with dates.
The direction of flow and structure number of the bridge is noted on Field book.
g) Culverts
Culvert is a cross drainage structure whose total length is less than 6 m.
Level Readings are to be taken at invert level of any pipe crossing the road or
affecting proposed drainage.
Level Readings at each end of pipe is taken as a string.
Only two points are enough on culvert strings.
Points are to be located at ground level.
One reading at centre of culvert is also to be taken.
In case of silted culverts silted level is to be taken as this will be the new invert
level.
Where there is a marked drain at inlet and outlet of culvert, shape of drain is to be
shown in plan.
Edge of shoulder (ES strings) is joined to the culvert strings.
Information regarding culvert number, number of vents, vent size and flow
direction is noted on the Field Book in bridge inventory format.
As marked three points are to be taken along the road centre line, one each at
start, centre and end of culvert.
The string number CE** and CC** continued to be the same.
Survey is closed onto a known station on main traverse. All data are collected in three
dimensional formats.
The discharge and flood data for existing bridges within the study area available with the
concerned authorities are to be obtained and used for establishing a comprehensive
database. Information on past floods and their effects on existing roads and bridges are to
be collected from records and by interviewing the local officers and people. Design flood
level and discharge is established using these data and information.
Hydraulic parameters for streams having well defined water shed are calculated through
rainfall data, catchment shape and size (from contours shown on topographic maps) and
unit hydrograph analysis. As the total quantity of drainage associated with small cross
drainage structures without well defined water shed is supposedly very low, the discharge
is computed by area velocity method. The hydraulic adequacy of the existing CD works is
the guiding factor in determining the requirement of additional structures. Local enquiry
about the adequacy is also to be made.
OR
The drainage pattern of the region is to be studied based on the available secondary data,
maps, etc. These, together with the recorded information on flooding in the vicinity and
hydraulic behaviour of bridges, is to be utilized in fixing the embankment height, bridge
and CD work locations, waterways, span arrangements, protection measures including
requirements of guide banks, etc.
The evaluation of load carrying capacity of bridges is to be carried out as per IRC: SP:37-
“Guidelines for Evaluation of Load Carrying Capacity of Bridges”. The analytical and co-
relations method is to be used for the structures having design data / as-built drawing are
available. The structures, for which the design data or as built drawing are not available,
the grade of concrete for superstructure, is assumed as M20 having adequate
reinforcement and are co-related with the present standard typical drawings. TOR will be a
guiding factor in determining the necessity of such tests.
Data on sub-surface conditions for the existing bridges in the vicinity is collected from the
records of the authorities concerned. Based on this data, an assessment of sub-surface
conditions for the bridges is to be made. Additional investigations including bore holes and
tests are to be carried out at the sites for river bridges, railway over bridges and road over
bridge. All bore hole investigations is to be entrusted to reputed geotechnical survey agency.
Available data on sub-surface conditions for all the existing bridges is collected from the
records of the central / state authorities concerned. The existing data is confirmed by
investigations and fresh data are obtained by conducting geo-technical investigation in the
following manner:
Sub soil investigations are to be carried out in accordance with IRC: 78-2000. Bore hole of
150 mm diameter are drilled by Rotary drilling using Nx size carbide bit (in case of hard
rock diamond cutting bit is to be used). Standard Penetration at every 1.5 m intervals and
every change of strata as described in IS: 2131 to all depth till refusal is to be carried out.
Undisturbed samples at regular intervals of 3 m in accordance with IS: 2132 are collected
and marked for identification, sealed with wax as per IS: 2132.3. Samples of soil,
weathered rock and hard rock encountered during drilling procedure are collected in a
chronological order and preserved in a core-box.
1.9.5 Identification & Evaluation of Construction Materials & Sources
Field and laboratory tests are undertaken for the quarry sites and borrow areas (including
sources of fly ash / slag which could be used in embankment construction), to determine
their suitability for various components of the work, and establish quality and quantity of
various construction materials, and recommend their use on techno-economic
considerations. The borrow areas are to be selected outside the right-of-way of the
proposed road, at suitable locations, keeping in view the techno-economic and
environmental requirements. Quarry charts are to be prepared showing lead and locations
of selected borrow areas, quarries and respective estimated quantities.
1.9.6 Sub-grade Characteristics and Strength
Sub-grade strength data is collected by sampling and testing of soil taken out from test
pits. Sub grade soil sampling is done at suitable intervals for each soil type. Testing, inter-
alia, includes the following:
It is the most important data needed to identify defects for deciding upon the maintenance.
The basic measurement of pavement condition is existing distresses. The information
required is on the type, severity and amount of distress. The most commonly occurring
distress forms are Alligator or Fatigue cracking, Bleeding, Block cracking,, Corrugation,
Depressions, Pot hole, Patch deterioration, Polishing of aggregate, Ravelling and Rutting.
Bituminous surfacing start developing cracks at some point of their service life under the
combined actions of traffic loading and the climate/environment. The cracks in the
surfacing are defects of serious nature, which weakens the pavement structure through
water penetration and are largely responsible for future deterioration. Cracks once initiated
progress in extent and severity to the ultimate point of spalling and development of
potholes. The rate of deterioration of the pavement usually accelerates after the
appearance of cracking and significantly affects the rate of roughness progression. The
variation in properties of materials and their behavior under different traffic loadings and
environmental conditions causes large differences in performance of pavements.
Deflection measurements (using the Benkelman Beam) are to be carried out as per
guidelines specified in IRC: 81-1997,”Tentative Guidelines of Strengthening of Flexible
pavements using Benkelman Beam Deflection (BBD) Technique”. Test pits are dug to
obtain pavement composition and establish a connection between compositions and
deflections especially if they differ from central strip to edge strip in a cross section. Where
the bituminous layers are thick, the temperature of the asphalt is measured and
deflections adjusted accordingly. Moisture correction factor is also established for the
deflection measurements to allow for seasonal variations. The subsoil moisture survey,
discussed below, together with prior experience in the region, also facilitates to develop
appropriate correction factors.
The representative deflection (each wheel track and lane) is determined by taking the
average plus 2 times the standard deviation. This is further adjusted for subsoil moisture,
wherever required.
Pavement roughness survey is carried out using Road Measurement Data Acquisition
System (ROMDAS). Single Bump Integrator with solid rear axle (half car) is fitted on TATA
SUMO vehicle or other calibrated vehicle. Before carrying out the survey, all necessary
checks are made about wheel alignment, wheel balancing, suspension and tyre pressure,
and odometer calibration is carried out to match correctly the pulses with distance.
The vehicle with BI attachment is moved along the wheel paths at a speed of 30+½ kmph
on project road. Two runs are made in each direction on the roads. Pavement Evaluation
Division of Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) has calibrated the system containing
Bump Integrator of Road Measurement Data Acquisition System (ROMDAS).
The raw data of roughness survey at 100m intervals is to be analyzed to obtain IRI of each
run in each direction using the calibration equation.
The project specific design standards are to be evolved after careful study of recently
completed / ongoing studies for the development of similar highways or expressways in the
region, and formulate the design standards for the project road, keeping in view the local
requirements, IRC standards, guidelines of the client and international practices.
Based on the design standards evolved and finalized, preliminary designs of horizontal and
vertical alignment are carried out by creating a DTM using ‘MX Roads’ software. The
geometric designs are to be based on the approved Design Criteria. The finalized alignment
design both vertically and horizontally are to be field verified through judiciously selected
sites. The alignment is also to be superimposed on topo sheets to find out the discrepancy in
general layout and relative levels.
One of the major inputs for pavement design is the cumulative ESAL (Equivalent Single Axle
Load). Axle Loads and Vehicle Damage Factors (VDF) values observed during the traffic
surveys in the region are to be used for this purpose. Combining the projected traffic volume
and the calculated VDF value, the cumulative ESAL for the design period is developed.
Pavement design is considered to be a very critical component for the Highway and the
requirements are analyzed in depth taking into account relevant design parameters such as
traffic projections, design cumulative ESAL, characteristics of materials and the climatic
conditions in the project influence area. Both options i.e., flexible and rigid pavements are to
be explored. Flexible pavement is to be designed using IRC:37-2000 as well as AASHTO
guidelines; the rigid pavement is designed as per guidelines of IRC:58-2002, Portland
Cement Association and AASHTO method. The final decision is to be taken based on life
cycle costs. For overlay, the design is carried out as per the IRC:81-1997 and Asphalt
Institute pavement deflection method as well as AASHTO effective structural member
method.
Detailed design of high embankments is carried out where necessary. The performance data
of existing high embankments are analyzed and utilized in the design. The design of high
embankments is carried out as per IRC: 75-1979. Possibility of reinforced earth
embankments is also to be examined and comparison is to be made among unprotected
embankment, reinforced earth protected, and RCC protected side slopes based on the
costs.
The nature, volume and intensity of projected traffic along the selected corridor are studied
to devise efficient traffic circulation pattern to be adopted at intersection points, during and
after the execution of the project. Data from the traffic surveys such as volume count and
estimated traffic dispersal characteristics at intersections forms the basis for designing
necessary traffic dispersal layout plan for ensuring a smooth flow of traffic.
Special attention is to be given for preparing traffic dispersal plan for the existing at-grade
intersections, in view of the likely interference of cross road traffic to the main road.
Based on the traffic dispersal system of the road, availability of road network near the
intersections, and availability of suitable land for service centers, the necessities of providing
suitable service roads along with their locations and alignments are to be examined. The
option for passing the through traffic by construction of an elevated highway, particularly for
the congested areas where land acquisition and relocation of facilities are likely to be very
difficult, is also to be considered.
Rest areas to be provided for travelers who wish to stop for rest, refreshment and refueling,
(without leaving the networks) wayside facilities are appropriately provided all along the
project road. The requirement of such facilities within the selected road stretch is to be
examined. These facilities can be provided on staggered basis on either side of the road.
The size and composition of the rest areas may vary according to the expected peak traffic
(during lunch and dinner hours), dwell time, location, proximity to existing available facilities
and places of special interest.
Wayside amenities and passenger oriented facilities to cater for emergencies and incidental
stops will include the following:
Petrol pumps;
Telephone kiosks;
First aid rooms;
Small parking lots;
Snack bars;
Small service facilities; and
Toilets
1.10.8 Road Furniture, Appurtenances and Landscaping
Safety and uninterrupted traffic flow are of special importance in urban as well as ghat
sections of the road, and these are considered in providing road furniture and
appurtenances as indicated below:
A plan for development of surplus land, within the right-of-way with a view to beautify the
road is to be prepared. The plan takes into account retention of the existing trees / plants, to
the extent possible. The proposal is to cover planting of trees, horticultural and floricultural
development on the surplus land and creation of gardens, wherever feasible.
Alternatives for the structural system, span arrangements, form of the superstructure,
foundation system etc. are to be considered keeping in view the aesthetic and environmental
requirements, functionality, physical and sub-soil conditions. The foundation system for the
existing bridges in the vicinity of the road is studied while deciding the requirements for the
new facilities.
The ROB / Grade Separator approaches are to be investigated for either embankment
reinforced earth structures or viaduct alternatives.
After completion of the preliminary design of bridges, detailed GAD are prepared for each
bridge giving details of span arrangement, details of sub structure and super structure, HFL,
river training works etc.
After studying the existing drainage pattern and general topography, rainfall, hydrology of the
area, an appropriate drainage system is to be evolved. The system consists of effective use
of cross drainage structures, their hydraulic adequacy, pavement internal drainage, road
sides drainage and its outfall. Provision of Camber in pavement and shoulders, and
roadside ditches and central drain, generally take care of surface drainage. The sub-surface
drainage is to be affected by providing sub-surface drains and drainage layer or geo-grid /
geo-textile within the pavement in combination with sub-surface drains, selectively, as and
where required. Suitable drainage system is also to be planned for the high embankment,
super-elevated carriageway and other key areas, with a view to ensure easy collection and
disposal of storm water.
After finalizing the drainage system, the drain design is carried out as per IRC: 42-1994 and
IRC:50-1999.
1.13 Cost Estimates, Economic and Financial Analysis
1.13.1 Preparation of BOQ and Cost Estimates
MoRT&H Specifications for Road & Bridge Works (latest edition) are to be followed for the
evolving of Technical Specifications for the construction work. The given technical
specifications are to be modified as per the project specific requirements. For the items of
works, which are not covered under MORTH specifications, detailed specifications are to be
prepared either by adoption from the ongoing contracts or based on past experience.
All quantities are to be calculated through developed programme/software and to be re-
checked to obtain near perfect accuracy. Before calculating the quantities, a careful study is
to be carried out in respect of Technical specification and drawings. All items, included in
specifications/ drawings are to be covered through quantities and in any case, no item is to
be missed out. Separate estimate is to be prepared for land acquisition/compensation,
resettlement/ rehabilitation and utility shifting.
The detailed rate analysis are to be carried out based on MoRT&H Standard of Data book
for Analysis of Rates, 2001 and with inputs from prevailing market rates for material,
equipment and labour. These inputs if not available from the market can be taken from
respective District Schedule of Rates (DSOR) of the client. The obtained rates are to be
compared with DSOR/ other ongoing contract of similar nature.
Based on the bill of quantities and schedule of rates prepared as above, the cost estimate is
prepared separately for each construction package. The project cost is further sub-divided
into civil works and non-civil works. Non-civil works comprise of resettlement/ rehabilitation
cost, land acquisition and environmental costs.
1.13.2 Economic Analysis
The economic evaluation for the project is to be undertaken separately for each
construction package and also for the project as a whole, using HDM 4 or suitable
software. Analysis is carried out upto a pre-defined horizon period. The economic
evaluation is to be carried out for both “Do Nothing / Do Minimum” and “with Project”
situations.
Do nothing / Do minimum scheme is the base road and traffic network against which
alternative improvement shall be assessed. Do Nothing and Do Minimum options are the
same, but will be different in following three scenarios:
the case where work will be carried out regardless of whether or not the with project
out option is considered.
the case where the existing network may be improved to form. Do minimum option
which can be tested as an alternative to carrying out with project option.
the case where traffic condition can be improved without significant capital
expenditure.
Cost and benefits arising in different years are transferred to their present values by the
process of discounting based on the following formula:
n
Present Value (PV) = S (1+r )
Where S - The sum
r - Discounting Rate (expressed in fraction)
n - year in which the sum is recorded
Benefits due to capacity augmentation are then calculated by comparing the user network
cost for `Do Nothing’ and with project situations.
The total project cost, estimated in financial terms at perceived market prices shall be
converted into economic cost to reflect the resource cost to the national economy. The
principal elements of financial cost at the current market price shall includes:
a) Civil works (excluding cost at land and property but including environmental and
social mitigation measures)
b) Ancillary works through the department
c) Consulting services and testing charges
d) Preparation and administration charges
e) Routine and recurrent maintenance
f) Periodic maintenance
To the financial cost, adequate conversion factor based on (taxation level) shall be applied
in order to get economic costs.
The economic analysis shall be based on economic internal rate of return (EIRR) and net
present value (NPV) using cost benefits approach. Annual steam at project benefits and
cost computed for 20 years shall be used in this analysis.
The sensitivity analysis is carried out by varying cost and benefit as under:
Financial analysis of the project covers Financial Internal Rate of Return, projected income
statement based on proposed user fee levels and revenue projections, cash flow statement
and balance sheets, amortization statement etc. The analysis also covers assessment of
risks associated with the project and their mitigation measures, including situation arising out
of cost and time over-run, shortfall in projected traffic volume, interest rate fluctuations,
political risks and force majeure etc.
The financial analysis is to be carried out separately for each construction package, and
suitable recommendations are to be made in respect of BOT/ Annuity/ Annuity cum BOT
concession package(s) identifying the capital structure, government incentives,
complementary public sector investments and contributions, if any, and other features
needed to make the BOT / Annuity/ Annuity cum BOT concession financially viable and
attractive to private sector.
Financing Options
The financing plan for private sector participation shall be prepared based on the following
alternatives:
Co-financing arrangements;
Availability of government funds;
Mobilization of internal funds;
Self financing ratio;
Equity contribution; and
Terms of loan
The option of financing the project through private sector investment on BOT or Annuity or
Annuity cum BOT is to be explored and the various sources for financing the project are to
be identified. Suggestions in terms of approximate mix of finances, arrangement of SPV if
possible are also to be made.
Financial Model
It shall be developed in two parts viz. revenue stream and expenditure stream.
For revenue stream, adequate allowances to be made in assessed tollable traffic for leakage
/ diverted traffic. Also attention shall be paid to the applicability of daily / monthly passes,
exemption to certain category of vehicles, reduction of tariff to local traffic (personal /
commercial), penalties for higher loads etc. while calculating the revenues.
In calculating the annual revenue, earning of only 330 days shall be incorporated.
No toll rate option is to be exercised and the rates circulated by MORTH in July 1997 are to
be adopted with applicable inflation to create revenue model.
Expenditure stream shall be based on the selected financing option. In base construction
cost, adequate / applicable provision for the cost of contingency, site establishment,
construction supervision, development charges, finance charges and other administrative
charges shall be made to arrive at the actual project cost. Operation and maintenance
(regular and periodically) shall be worked at based on the detailed analysis and every
associated item shall be accounted for in that analysis. The following basic assumption shall
be made in developing this system.
a Rate of inflation
b Rate of interest during construction
c Debt: Equity ratio
d Time period of construction
e Coupon rate and grace period
f Payback period of loan
g Classification of equity (quasi or hybrid or mezzanine
h Annual depreciation
i Corporate income tax rate and any other taxes as applicable
j insurance cost (during and after construction)
k Tax exemption under IT Act
Financial Viability
In this exercise, cash flow projections and financing plan are to be prepared at current
market prices taking into account all contingency allowances, both in terms of physical and
price contingency. This analysis is based on the following elements:
For the accepted option, the sensitivity analysis shall be carried out by varying cost and
revenue as under:
2.1.1 General
Topographic survey is the basis of every Detailed Engineering study. Level of correctness
of all the required designs primarily depends on accuracy of the collected topographic
data. It therefore, becomes inevitable to adopt a systematic and schematic approach in
carrying out the topographic survey ensuring the desired accuracy.
Reconnaissance will begin only after the study of all maps of the project area, published
by Survey of India in scale of 1:50,000. Besides support of satellite imagery obtained from
National Remote Sensing Agency on scale of 1:50,000 shall be taken to have latest
information of the project area to update the available topographic maps. Other useful
inputs viz. information on natural resources, geology, geomorphology, land use, soil
status, drainage pattern, forest etc. will be derived form the imageries. Reconnaissance
survey will be carried out considering the points listed in Appendix-3 of IRC: SP19-2001.
The horizontal control grid will be fixed using Differential Global Positioning System
(DGPS) with two Trimble make geo-receivers at every 5 km on a pair of control stations
with an accuracy of + 20 cm in northings and eastings, and + 50 mm in elevation . These
will be called as Primary Control Stations.
Selection of primary Control Points and Observations shall be as detailed below:
These will be located on the edge of the proposed right of way (ROW) at inter-visible
locations at every 5 km.
These will be, as far as possible, on either side of 5 km stone so that it can be
identified easily in the field and an arrow shall be painted on the existing road
indicating their location. They will be recorded in separate field with their three
dimensional locations.
The stations selected will be free from obstruction towards sky at an angle of 15° with
horizontal plane.
The horizontal control station shall be established on nail fixed in centre of RCC (M15)
pillar of size 15 cm x 15 cm x 45 cm embedded in concrete M10 (5 cm all around) up
to a depth of 30 cm and the balance 15 cm above the ground shall be painted yellow.
The Primary Control Stations will be fixed using DGPS Trimble make instrument. The
time of observations at Base Stations will be observed for a minimum of 30 minutes
and at Reference Stations for 20 minutes or longer if instrument signal is not indicating
sufficient data received, to eliminate the possible projection and time errors in the
signals received from various satellites being observed at respective locations in order
to ensure high accuracy in the positioning of control stations within + 20 mm.
Minimum of 6 satellites will be available during observation to ensure high accuracy.
Secondary control stations will be established at 2 km intervals using Total Station and
through closed traverse distributed linearly running between two nearest Primary Control
Stations ensuring an accuracy in the order of 12 √K in mm, where ‘k’ is the distance in
kilometres between two primary control stations. Any errors within permissible limits will
be distributed in rational manner to establish the accurate and effective horizontal control
grid. These shall be established on reference pillars having configuration similar to primary
control station with an arrow painted on the surface of existing road indicating their
location.
These will be located, as far as possible, along the proposed right of way (ROW)
boundaries at an interval of 250 m with BM No. marked on it with red paint.
Bench Mark pillar will be of size 15 cm x 15 cm x 45 cm cast in RCC M15 with a nail
fixed in the centre of the top surface and embedded in concrete M10 (5cm all around)
up to a depth of 30 cm. The balance 15 cm above the ground shall be painted yellow.
An arrow indicating the location of the BM will be painted on the road with the
permanent yellow paint and recorded in separate field books with its three dimensional
location.
The Bench Marks will be established using high accuracy Digital Level and Bar coded staff
by way of double run levelling in small circuits of 3 km length ensuring an accuracy in the
order of 6 k mm, where ‘k’ is the distance in kilometres between two Bench Marks
available in the project area, and error, if any, within permissible limits will be distributed in
rational manner to establish the accurate and effective vertical control grid.
The topographic survey will extend up to the proposed Right of Way (ROW). Wherever
necessary, the survey corridor width will be further increased to accommodate situations
arising out of encroachments and any other contingencies. The survey area at the locations
of intersections will cover up to a minimum of 500m on the either side of the centerline, and
will be of sufficient width to accommodate improvement measures. Necessary surveys will
also be carried out for determining the requirements of service roads for local traffic, where
appropriate.
The traverse and topographic survey will be carried out using latest calibrated, high
precision Total Station (calibration of instrument certified by authorized agency) and will be
closed at horizontal control points and checked for accuracy in position and bearing within
the order of 1 in 10,000. Repetition will be warranted, if desired accuracy is not achieved.
Similarly, the leveling will be carried out using Digital Level and checked for accuracy at
vertical control stations and the repetitions will be warranted, if desired accuracy is not
achieved. In addition, periodic checking will be carried out to ensure accuracy of the work.
i. + 20 mm + 2mm per km for x and y values for reconciliation with primary control
stations.
ii. + 5 mm for x and y values between adjacent secondary control stations.
iii. + 5 mm/km for z values for reconciliation with SOI bench mark.
iv. + 5 mm/km for z values between adjacent secondary control points.
The detailed field surveys will essentially include the following activities:
o Topographic Surveys along the Existing Right of Way (ROW) will be conducted by
running a continuous open Traverse along the existing road and realignments,
wherever required, and fixation of all cardinal points such as horizontal
intersection points (HiP’s), centre points and transit points etc. and properly
referencing the same with a pair of reference pillars fixed on either side of the
centre-line at safe places within the ROW. Closing error between two adjacent
primary control stations will be distributed within them, i.e. within 5 km traverse.
o Details will be collected for all features such as structures (bridges and culverts
etc.) utilities, existing roads, electric and telephone installations (both O/H as well
as underground), huts, buildings, fencing and trees (with girth greater than 0.3
metre) oil and gas lines etc. falling within the extent of survey.
a) The width of the survey corridor will take into account the layout of the existing
alignment including the extent of embankment and cut slopes and the general
ground profile. While carrying out the field surveys, the widening scheme (i.e.
right, left or symmetrical to the centre line of the existing carriageway) will be
taken into consideration so that the topographic surveys cover sufficient width
beyond the centre line of the proposed divided carriageway. Normally the surveys
will extend a minimum of 30 m beyond either side of the centre line of the existing
b) In case the reconnaissance survey reveals the need for bypassing the congested
locations, the traverse lines will be run along the possible alignments in order to
identify and select the most suitable alignment for the bypass. The detailed
topographic surveys will be carried out along the bypass alignment approved by
client. At locations where grade separated intersections could be the obvious
choice, the extent of survey area will be suitably increased. Field notes of the
survey will be maintained which will also provide information about traffic, soil,
drainage etc.
d) Where existing roads cross the alignments (NH, SH, MDR). The survey will extend
a minimum of 100 m for MDR and village roads and 200 m for SH and NH on
either side of the centre line of existing road and will be of sufficient width to allow
improvements, including at-grade intersection to be designed.
The topographic surveys for longitudinal and cross-sections will cover the
following:
i. Longitudinal section levels along existing centre line at every 25 m
interval, at the locations of curve points, small streams, intersections and
at the locations of change in elevation at every 5 to 10 m interval.
ii. Cross sections at every 50 m Interval in full extent of survey covering 5
numbers of spot levels on existing carriageway in case of 2-lane road and
All important physical features along the alignment will be collected. These
features affect the project proposals and should normally include buildings and
structures, monuments, burial grounds, cremation grounds, places of worship,
railway lines, stream / river / canal, water mains, sewers, gas/ oil pipes, crossings,
Pipal & other trees, plantations, utility services such as electric, and telephone
lines (Overhead & Underground) and poles, optical fiber cables (OFC) and ROW
stone, Km. and Hectometer, etc.
The Total Stations and Digital Levels Auto Levels shall be checked by the Survey
Engineer for permanent and temporary adjustments before use on the project.
a) It shall be ensured that the field staffs made aware of their own safety while
carrying out field surveys along highway.
b) Safety working goods shall be available at site.
c) Movable warning signs (Survey in Progress) with orange flag placed at both ends
of survey activity zone.
d) Traffic cones with orange and black with horizontal stripes.
The data collected in the field with the help of concise field notes shall be sufficient enough
to develop a Digital Terrain Model on MX-road design software. The final alignment shall
be worked out considering geometric requirements, realignments, improvement needs and
bypasses. The design shall further, be subjected to social, environmental, ecological, land
availability and economic considerations. The finalised centre line thereafter shall be
analyzed for set-out data.
Staking of final centre line is the most important component of topographic survey, which
ensures not only the effective implementation of the scheme, but also the correctness and
accuracy of the design. The staking and referencing will be done in following manner:
i. Curve points viz. BS, BC, HIP/AC, EC and ES will be set out.
ii. If straight length between two curves is more than 500 m, intermediate Point of
Tangency (POT) shall be set out. Inter-visibility shall be achieved wherever
warranted by providing more intermediate POT.
iii. If the curve is very long, intermediate centre points at reasonable distances along
the curve will be set out.
iv. Reference pillars will be properly fixed with a pair of concrete pillars for every
curve point except BC and EC.
v. Additional pillars on centre line will be fixed on either banks of major / minor
bridges, ROB and Grade Separators.
vi. On existing carriageway the centre line will be marked with a nail and a pained
circle around the nail.
Staking shall be done from the old traverse points. In case old traverse points are missing/
disturbed, new traverse or the final centre line points fixed will be connected to DGPS
points and intended accuracy ensured. Staking will be done at 50m interval in plain/ rolling
terrain and 20 m interval in mountainous terrain.
The straightness of the points on tangent viz. BS, ES, HIP, POT shall be checked possibly
for every individual tangent. The Apex of Curve (AC) shall be fixed from one tangent and
checked from the other tangent to ensure correctness of the curve layout.
Every stake set out on the field shall be checked with design proposals and the
correctness ensured. All established benchmarks in 250 m interval shall be connected to
GTS datum and check level shall be run over the entire line back to the first bench mark.
Special care shall be taken to provide adequate protection to all points of reference and
the information pertaining to them shall be transferred to the plan drawings so that at the
time of construction the centre line and the bench mark could be located in the field
without difficulty.
2.2.1 General
The Geotechnical Investigation comprised of two main phases, namely (i) Field activity
involving boring, rock drilling, sampling and field test and (ii) Laboratory test on collected
soil, rock and water samples. Quality assurance will be implemented by carrying out the
concerned test as per the respective code. The detail thereof is indicated below:
The check list proforma for pre-inspection of the instruments used in field investigation and
carrying out field tests are devised in order to keep quality assurance. These proforma
showing the activity and responsibility assigned is as under:
Undisturbed Samples
Sr. Activity Responsibility
No.
1. Cleaning of bore hole Site Engineer
2. Thin walled tube dimensions and condition. Site Engineer
3. Adaptor condition and tightening it to sampling tube. Site Engineer
4. Marking on roads to observe the penetration Site Engineer
5. Pushing of sampler vertically in the bore hole using Site Engineer
hydraulic pressure.
6. Sample retrieval, examination and labelling etc. Site Engineer
7. Waxing / wrapping foil to the sample without disturbance. Site Engineer
8. Transportation of samples to onshore laboratory Site Engineer
The pavement structural strength evaluation shall be carried out by measuring the
deflection with Benkelman Beam test in accordance with IRC: 81-1997 ("Guidelines for
Strengthening of Flexible Road Pavements Using Benkelman Beam Deflection
Technique"). The quality of deflection observation will be ensured through:
The above task shall be carried out by the Field Engineer under the supervision of
Pavement Engineer/Material Engineer.
Quality assurance over the determination of sub-grade characteristics and strength shall
be met with by making the trial pit on interface of shoulder and pavement, conducting the
field density, observing the crust thickness of various component of existing pavement and
collecting the soil sub grade samples for further test in laboratory. These will be attended
by the Field Engineer under the supervision of Material/Geotech Engineer.
The field dry density of sub grade soils either using core-cutter or sand replacement
method will be conducted. The field dry density is carried out with core-cutter method for
fine-grained soils (clayey soil) free from aggregates in accordance with IS 2720 (Part 29),
reaffirmed in 1988. The sand replacement method as per IS 2720 (Part 28), reaffirmed in
1988 for finding the field dry density of sub-grade of pavement is adopted for sandy /
gravely sub grade of fine grained soils.
The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer is an instrument designed for the rapid in-situ
measurement of the structural properties of existing road pavements. From the plot of
penetration v/s no. of blows and the correlations established between measurements with
DCP and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) the DCP-CBR value using the established
curves/formulae developed shall be worked out.
The samples shall be collected with due care of labeling to determine the soil
characteristics and engineering properties like Gradation, Atterberg’s limit, Modified
Maximum Dry Density / Optimum moisture content and CBR. The excavated trial pit will be
refilled with the same material with thorough compaction and the surface is made good. All
these parameters are tested in accordance with following Bureau of Indian Standards.
Soil and aggregate are naturally available prime material required for construction of road
pavement and as such its characteristics are varied from place to place. In order to identify
the suitable material satisfying the specified test value, an intensive field survey to locate
these materials with quantity assessment is desirable. A desk work, before the field
survey, shall be undertaken by inspection of surrounding project roads, interaction with
Aggregate sample from available resource shall be collected and tested to decide its
suitability against specified test value for use in road pavement. The aggregate shall be
tested for following parameters.
Crushing Strength of Aggregate As per IS: 2386 (Part 3)
Aggregate Impact Test As per IS: 2386 (Part 3)
Water Absorption of Aggregate As per IS: 2386 (Part 3)
Specific Gravity of Aggregate As per IS: 2386 (Part 3)
Coating and Stripping of Bitumen Test As per IS: 6241-1971
Elongation and Flakiness Index As per IS: 2386 (Part 1)
The soil samples from borrow area shall be tested for Gradation, Atterberg limit, Modified
Compaction, CBR at three energy level, Swell test, Direct Shear test in accordance with
relevant IS code. Based on test value and specified limit, the right type of soil borrow area
shall be recommended. Due consideration regarding making good the borrow area and
quarry areas after the exploitation shall be suggested.
The availability of surface/ground water shall also be checked and its suitability for use in
construction work shall be decided after conducting test like pH, Sulphates, Chloride and
suspended matters.
A survey for locally available material like Fly ash, Waste Slag and other waste material
shall also be covered.
Resources for manufactured material like Bitumen, Cement, Reinforcement Steel, Bricks
etc shall also be carried out and its suitability vis-à-vis specification shall be suggested.
Procedure of QAP for topographical survey, production of design and drawing the Quality
Assurance outlined for road portion shall be followed for the structures also.
The inventory and condition survey for bridges and structure shall include the main and
important features as per IRC-SP:35 “Guidelines for Inspection and Maintenance of
Bridges” and IRC-SP:19-2001 “Manual for survey Investigation”
The data collected shall be presented in a tabular form along with appropriate proposals
for correcting the deficiencies.
Visual observations to be carried out during the condition survey would be mainly to find
out the distresses. In addition to the superstructures, the masonry substructures shall be
inspected to locate cracks and loose mortar in joints, especially for pier and abutments.
After carrying out the initial condition survey, an assessment of the structures shall be
made based on the findings of condition survey.
The evaluation of load carrying capacity of bridges shall be carried out as per IRC:SP:37-
Guidelines for Evaluation of Load Carrying Capacity of Bridges. The analytical and co-
relations method shall be used for the structures having design data / as-built drawing if
available. For the structures for which the design data or as built drawing will not be
available, the grade of concrete for superstructure M20 shall be considered with sufficient
reinforcement and shall be co-related with the present standard typical drawings or load
test have to be done (within the provisions of TOR). The bridges identified to be in a
distressed condition based upon the visual condition survey, supplementary testing shall
be carried out as per specific requirement of the structures.
To carryout the design of bridges, cross drainage structures and other structures as per
TOR, the design requirement stipulated in relevant IRC codes /MoRTH guidelines shall be
followed. Wherever IRC codes are silent other relevant BIS or international code shall be
adopted.
The performance of the cross drainage structures is completely dependent on the basic
hydraulic details and field data adopted for its design. The field data shall be collected as
mentioned in relative part of QAP for topographic survey. The hydrology of the structure
located on major stream shall be cross checked by various methods like based on area
velocity, catchments area etc., and compared with the visual observation. The design of
the structure shall be carried out with the help of various computer programme developed
in house, its authenticity have been proved with approval of these computer aided design
by various clients as well as through a manual check wherever required. The bridge
/structural engineer shall carry out the design using computer aided techniques. The
design shall be cross-checked at various stages by an alternate Bridge/structural
engineer. The bridge specialist shall review the design to ensure that it has been properly
carried out, the input data is authentic and task under taken fully in compliance with the
requirement of TOR as well as standard prescribed for respective work. It shall be also
compared with the design prepared for other similar works.
The different components of the structure shall be designed based on various codes and
standards as mentioned below to assure the required quality.
4. Superstructure
5. Bearings
6. Protection Work
IRC: 89-1997 Guidelines for Design and Construction of River training
Works
Well-designed survey formats will be used as per the guidelines of IRC codes. The survey
formats for WTP and O-D surveys will be detailed as well as simple for understanding for
both enumerators and also for commuters. Appropriate coding will be adopted in survey
formats, which will facilitate the enumerators for recording the responses. 15 minute
intervals will be adopted in classified volume count, turning movement count and other
related surveys.
To maintain good quality and accuracy in data collections enumerators will be paid
adequately. The surveys will be programmed and planned by a senior traffic engineer. The
senior traffic engineer will be entrusted the responsibility in accuracy in collected data and
controlling all the field operations. There will be a senior supervisor along with
enumerators who will be making regular visits to each survey team and keep on checking
the collected data at regular intervals.
At the end of each shift of eight hours, the supervising engineer will make a summary of
hourly counts. This data will be used to check consistency of traffic volumes from day to
day of counting with respect to hourly and daily volumes. In case of major variations
exceeding 25% with out any reason, the survey will be repeated.
The supervising engineer will also make random independent checks at various locations
by counting vehicles for 15 minutes. All the field survey data will be filled with identification
information like date, day, shift, direction, weather condition etc. These entries will be
checked and signed by supervisor.
2.4.1.4 Documentation
All the filled up data sheets will be suitably numbered stitched and will be sent to head
office for data entry, processing and analysis.
The collected data will be entered in computer without much delay. After making entry in
computer the entered data will be checked manually. In case of any wrong entry found
during cross checking will be corrected immediately.
Enumerators who have already done similar traffic surveys will be given
preference.
It will be ensured that the enumerators employed are able to carry out the
assigned work like counting and for keeping the proper record.
The enumerators who are responsible for interviews in O-D surveys and for
Willingness to Pay (WTP) surveys will be more qualified and capable enough to
interview the commuters. It will be ascertained that they are capable enough to
ask clear questions without creating any doubt and confusion.
All the enumerators are to be given an orientation about the objective and possible impact
of the above project so as develop interests with the assigned job. The purpose of the
survey and survey formats are to be clearly explained to the enumerators. The
methodology of filling the survey format is to be explained to enumerators in detail.
The traffic surveys are quite tiring job for enumerators therefore it is proposed to conduct
traffic surveys in shift of 8 hours. Working beyond 8 – hours becomes quite tiring and
enumerators may not be able to work with full efficiency. Therefore one enumerator will be
allowed to work maximum for one shift only.
Enumerators may not be able to work continuously for 8 hours with full efficiency. They are
to be relived if required, therefore at least one reliever enumerator will be kept with a group
of twenty enumerators.
2.4.2.6 Incentives
The enumerators who perform better in traffic surveys and take extra initiative will be given
incentives in terms of monetary benefit. Traffic supervisors will identify such enumerators.
All the traffic surveyors will be issued identity card. An authentic letter regarding conduct of
traffic surveys will be provided to supervising engineer.
All the traffic surveys to be conducted with the assistance of traffic police. Traffic
policemen to be requested to provide full cooperation for getting good feedback from
commuters.
To avoid the impact of urban traffic the survey locations are selected away from urban
environment. The impact of urban traffic may provide noisy data and misleading picture,
which may affect analysis.
For deciding proper zones in case of O-D surveys following points are kept in mind.
Thus keeping in mind above points the zoning was done in three levels. In first level all-
important towns (traffic generators) lying on the road are assigned a separate zone code.
Next, immediate influence areas of project road are considered and nearby districts are
considered as separate zones. Finally, states beyond the influence are considered which
may contribute trips to the road.
The sample size plays a very important role in data collection specially for O-D surveys,
WTP surveys, Truck Terminal Surveys and Parking Surveys etc. The sample size should
be adequate for the corresponding population. The standard laid in Bureau of Public
Roads will be adopted. The sample size will be taken greater than 20% so that even after
removal of some noisy data the sample size will be found to be adequate for further
analysis.
To ensure better quality during speed and delay survey it is proposed that well-trained
staff will conduct the survey. There will be two test runs so as to avoid any possible error
in 1st run.
The trend of traffic volume will be explored with the help of past traffic data wherever it is
available. The collected data will be compared with past data. If satisfactory data is not
achieved the appropriate reasons will be explored in consultation with client for
authenticity of current data / past data. If convincing reasons are not obtained traffic
surveys will be repeated and verified.
It is necessary to carry out a base line survey of the existing level of environmental and
social issues in the project area. This will be carried out by collection of data from the
primary as well as secondary sources as per the central and state government guidelines
and directives of the international funding agencies. The applicability of the various laws /
Acts / Policy to the proposed project shall be identified at the stage. Information will also
be collected from any additional sources in addition to the target communities in the
project area. This data will be useful in environmental mapping and identification of
sensitive ecological areas.
Based on the analysis of the above data, the project will be categorized based on its
environmental sensitivity. The outcome of the initial screening will be in the form of
recommendations for the further scope of environmental assessment.
The following checklist is usually applicable to project funded by ADB only. However, it will
be used as outlined in the TOR.
After reviewing the answers above the Mission Leader and Environment Specialist agree
that the project.
Should be categorized as an A project
Should be categorized as a B project
Should be categorized as a B project in an environmentally sensitive area
Should be categorized as a C project
Should be categorized as an A/B project because (give reason)
Requires additional information for classification. Therefore
o An Environment Specialist should be involved in the PPTA Fact-finding
Mission
o The Mission Leader should gather additional information during the PPTA
Fact-finding Mission.
A complete identification of adverse as well as beneficial effects due the project would be
carried out to obtain exact assessment of the impact on surrounding environment and
communities in the influence area. This will be the basis for recommended cost-effective
means of either elimination or mitigation of adverse effects along with remedial measures.
The method developed by Battelle Laboratories known as Battelle Environmental
Evaluation System (BEES) is to be utilised in the evaluation process.
It will be necessary to monitor the environmental and social impact. A monitoring and
management mechanism will be suggested for this purpose.
This plan is a part of the Contract Document and shall be included in the Bid Document.
It shall include base line socio economic studies and census of project affected persons
and households. The assets lost due to implementation of the project shall be evaluated
and compensation and R&R entitlement frame work shall be prepared. All qualitative
social investigation and analysis shall be conducted, planning supervision and quality
checks shall be carried out.
2.6.1 General
Quality of the economic and financial analysis of a project depends upon the accuracy of
its inputs and the adopted economic and financial model. Therefore, it is imperative to
assure the quality of the traffic analysis, project cost calculations and other inputs viz.
financial indices, project planning, other operational costs etc.
Economic analysis shall be based on the “Highway Design and Maintenance Manual”
(HDM-IV), an analytical tool used for engineering and economic assessment of highway
projects. The model is based on physical and economic relationship derived from
extensive research on road deterioration, the effect of maintenance activities and road
user costs and its accuracy depends on the following:
Capital Costs : Quantities of inputs and their unit values
: Implementation Schedule
Quality assurance aspects of capital costs and traffic forecast have already been
discussed in previous sections. Implementation schedule shall be prepared based on the
site condition, intended resource mobilisation by the contractor, availability of fund and
contract packaging as approved by client. It shall be ensured that it should be as realistic
as possible. To determine the likely annual progress during the implementation stage, a
detailed work programme shall be developed keeping all the possible constraints in
consideration.
Data pertaining to assessment of vehicle operating cost shall be collected from at least
three different sources of which preferably two should be located at the extreme ends of
the project. These shall be collected at time of preparation of economic analysis in order to
obviate the time factor and eventually the inflation. Accident data shall be arranged in the
categories namely, fatal, serious injury and minor and their ex-post cost shall be calculated
based on the prevailing market prices.
Applicability of the model to Indian conditions shall be ensured by calculating capital cost
and maintenance costs using HDM-IV, whereas the VOC savings and time savings will be
calculated using the speed flow and VOC’s relationship developed and standardized by
the Indian studies (Road User Cost Study and IRC: SP-30) to represent the Indian
climatic, traffic and topographical conditions. Discount rate shall be assessed considering
difference between interest on government borrowings and prevalent inflation.
Financial analysis shall be based on the financial model developed in-house and tested
and run successfully on several similar projects which have since gone for execution. The
model is based on the integrated effect of various costs on revenue earning capability of
the project in a defined period. Its accuracy depends on the following:
Toll rates shall be ascertained after the careful study of users willingness, optimization of
returns through logit model, rates being charged on similar projects and MORTH
prescribed rates. While fixation of these rates, it shall be ensured that it would be within
manageable limits of common man and at the same time, sufficient revenue is generated.
Financial parameters shall be fixed after the detailed discussion with the leading financial
institutions involving in infrastructure lending business. On fixation of financial parameters,
financing plan for private sector participation shall be prepared and viable alternative shall
be worked out from the following options:
2.7.1 General
The objective of this section is to ensure that the related activities in the fields of design,
drawings and documentation are planned, consistent and controlled. The output in the
form of designs, drawings and documents are verified and the final products satisfy the
specified project needs.
The adopted quality assurance system involves several step by step procedures and
these are brought out in the following paragraphs:
2.7.3.1 Organization
As the project requires the involvement of various disciplines for operational purposes, the
entire project team is divided into a number of groups, each headed by a Key Professional
(KP). For a typical project, key professional are drawn from the various disciplines as
appropriate (or specified in TOR). For a typical project, the key personnel in the
Consultant’s team as appropriate are indicated below along with their accountability.
Organizational Set Up
Position ID Accountable Liases with
Project Co-ordinator PC Executive Clients, Head of various
Disciplines, project
Functionaries and external
technical services
Senior Highway KP (HE) PC Specialists of other
Engineer disciplines and suppliers of
external services
Senior Traffic KP (TE) PC, KP(HE) Specialists of other
Engineer disciplines
Senior Bridge KP (BS) PC, KP (HE) -do-
Specialist
Pavement Engineer KP (PE) PC, KP (HE), -do-
KP(ME), KP(TE)
Senior Material cum KP (ME) PC, KP( HE), KP(PE) Specialists of other
Geotechnical disciplines and suppliers of
Engineer external services
Senior Transport KP (TS) PC, KP (TE), KP(QS) Specialists of other
Economist disciplines and various
financial institution
Senior KP (ES) PC, KP (RR), KP Specialists of other
Environmental (HE) disciplines and State Forest
Specialist and other environmental
agencies
Senior. KP (RR) PC, KP (HE), KP -do-
Rehabilitation & (ES)
Resettlement Expert
Sr. Survey Engineer KP (SE) PC, KP (HE), KP Support engineers of the
(BS) project and suppliers of
external technical service.
Sr. Quantity KP (QS) PCL, KP (HE), KP -do-
Surveyor (BS), KP (ME)
The technical interfaces of the major tasks have been identified as follows:
On similar grounds, regular meetings shall be arranged with client to keep them inform the
up-to-date picture of the project.
Before the design work is taken up, PC shall discuss with KP(s) and finalise the design
parameters in consultation with client. The design parameters shall be approved by client
before commencement of design activities. The software to be used for design shall also
be finalized at this stage to ensure data compatibility. This includes the following:
Following check list shall be used in finalizing the design criteria to suit the project specific
needs:
Check List for Design Standards
Discipline Design Criteria Specific Project Needs
Highway Speed, Sight Distance, Based on sound Engineering Practice
ROW, Cross section, Compatible to similar development works
Carriageways, Shoulder, In compliance with codal provisions
Vertical and horizontal Environmental Friendly
Profile, Service Road, Easy to construct
drainage network, road Aesthetically pleasing and comfortable to
furniture and way side road users
amenities Economic
Safety to road users
Scope for future upgradation
Structure Geotechnical Compatible to similar development works
investigation, span In compliance with codal provisions
arrangement, Easy to construct
Foundation, Sub and Economic
super structure, river Scope for future up gradation
protection work Safety to road users
Pavement Flexible and rigid Durable
overlay/ fresh design Based on sound Engineering Practice
In compliance with codal provisions
Environmental Friendly
Scope for future upgradation
All field surveys shall be carried out as per work schedule and their data shall be
available in the finalised formats. Field survey data are received for the followings:
i. Road Inventory
ii. Pavement Condition including its structural strength
iii. Topographic Details including longitudinal and lateral profiling
iv. Inventory and Condition of Existing Cross Drainage Structures
v. Soil and Material Survey
vi. Geotechnical Investigation
vii. Hydrological Details
viii. Environmental Impact Assessment
ix. Revenue Details
x. Resettlement and Rehabilitation Requirement
Design activities shall commence in the road stretch for which the field survey
data is approved by KP. Based on the total work and the quantum of the work
involved, for which data is available, KP shall assign different engineers for the
required task to be taken up.
After finishing off the preliminary design, KP shall inspect the design and give
his/her comments as whether approved design criteria has followed or needs
review owing to ground condition or additional data is needed. If the approved
design criteria, needs the review it shall be done in consultation with PC and
related KP(s) in a Design Review meeting and finally approval of client shall be
sought of. After incorporation of other general comments of KP, KP shall re-
inspect the preliminary design and give his/her comments to proceed for detailed
design.
Particular attention shall be paid to take into cognisance of related work of other groups
viz. bridge group and highway group. PC shall co-ordinate with the other disciplines to
finalise the desired and co-ordinated design.
After finalization of detailed design, PC shall arrange for Road safety audit. The
PC shall monitor the results of the safety audit and if requires modify the design.
This includes:
Requirements of client.
Preliminary drawings and data; source, responsibilities of supply and methods of
verification.
Design approach, applicable codes, special design specifications.
Methods of analysis, calculation, checking and internal approvals.
Contents of design reports (Detailed calculations).
Final drawings.
Checking and approval by external approving authority, if any.
A checklist for checking of Design data for highway and bridges are shown in the
Annexure-II. Any missing data or error in data shall be reported by KP immediately to PC
2.7.6 Drawings
The PC shall decide and co-ordinate with the different KP(s) whenever required for
deciding the size(s) of drawings to be adopted in the project. The drawings shall be of
standard sizes(s) as mentioned in the following table (or specified in ToR):
Drawing Sizes
Type of Work Size Dimensions Scale
Location Plan A2 420mm x 594mm 1: 250000
Site Plan A2 420mm x 594mm 1:50000
Alignment Plan
Draft A3 420mm x 297mm 1:2500
Final A3 420mm x 297mm
Longitudinal profile
Sincere efforts shall be made by PC to ensure that concerned functionaries all throughout
the project use a uniform size of drawings. In unavoidable circumstances when
consistency of size cannot be maintained for any genuine reason(s) the PC shall accept
variation in length of drawings only without any deviations in the width.
A standard title block shall be prepared for the use in all drawings. The designed spaces
for signatures shall be filled out as the drawing progress through issue cycle. The wording
of title of drawings shall be finalized in consultation with the concerned KP.
Where
2213 : indicates the project number
YY : indicates the drawing type
ZZ : the drawing number
The drawings shall contain and/or make reference to the appropriate inputs
documents/assumptions made in the space allocated for NOTES. The input documents
may be in any of the following forms:
a) The confirming dimensions, levels and other requirements shall be marked with
yellow colour on the drawing while non-conformance shall be marked with
necessary correction on the drawing in red colour.
b) The reworked drawing after corrections shall be verified again and the corrections
marked in red shall be encircled with green colour to indicate that the same have
been incorporated. The checked print of the drawing duly signed and dated by the
checking functionary shall then be passed on to the approving authority (TL) for
record.
2.10.3.4 Approval
If he/she is satisfied with the contents and quality, the concerned KP or any functionary of
the project organization shall approve the drawing.
The drawing issued from a discipline shall contain approval signature of KP concerned to
indicate technical adequacy of the design.
When the drawing is to be issued the same also contain signature or initial of PC in the
title block to indicate that the same meets the project requirement.
2.8.1 General
In broad terms, for quality assurance of the project report it is necessary for each section/
volume of the report to conform the project requirements/ TOR. Ideally, there should not
be any place for non-conformity. The purpose of this section is to evolve a system
applicable to all concerns in preparation, review, verification and amendment to project
report and also, a systematic approach towards quality audit to have a sound end product.
2.8.2 Procedure
A skeleton format shall be made by PC to commence the preparation of each project
report keeping in consideration of the desired coverage of the document as defined in ToR
or by Client. The related information shall be collected and put into one place by
respective KP in a computer file in sequential manner. One hard copy shall be prepared
and bound in file with the cover sheet containing all the information relating to the subject,
its sources, name(s) of concerned project staff, and date of inspection/revision along with
revision number. The same shall be produced in every Progress Review Meeting for
scrutiny and further review if required.
Concerned KP shall compile all the information viz. field data, technical literature, project
design, design calculation sheet and suggestions by client into the report format based on
skeleton proforma prepared by PC. These shall be stored in chapter wise computer files
and one hard copy of the same shall be maintained all the time.
The non-confirming design/design calculation/field data/analysis shall be sent back by the
PC to KP for taking appropriate action(s). All non-confirming matters shall be identified as
“NOT APPROVED” on Document. The record of such shall be maintained till completion of
the project.
All corrections in the project report/document shall be marked by the PC after cutting the
incorrect part(s) so as to establish that the same have under gone checking. A record of
such matters with the corrections shall be maintained by PC in the same file containing the
Project report/document till completion of the project.
The KP shall make the necessary correction and take appropriate actions so as to close
all non conformities by producing the acceptable data/design/drawing/design calculations.
These corrected documents shall than be sent to PC for approval.
The PC shall re-inspect the corrected project report/document and verify the
conformances with his/her previous comments in the manner explained in the foregoing
paragraphs
In broad terms, for quality assurance of collection of revenue data and preparation of land
acquisition schedule it is necessary to evolve a system applicable to all concerns in
preparation, review, verification and amendment to land acquisition schedule.
2.9.1.2 Procedure
Concerned Senior Surveyor and Highway Engineer will compile all the information viz.
revenue data, revenue maps, land ownership records and suggestions by client into the
report format based on skeleton proforma prepared by Team Leader.
To prepare the master list of revenue records the following sequence will be followed:
a) On commencement, all districts, tehsils / talukas and gram panchayats will be
identified that fall under project affected areas. Details of villages falling on project
road will be collected from available village maps at Tehsil headquarters by
superimposing the relevant toposheets in order to obviate the possibility of leaving any
village.
b) District Land Record (DLR) office will be approached for collection of revenue maps of
identified villages and project corridor in at least 150 m width will be marked on them.
Authenticity of marked project corridor will be adjudged and attested by respective
Patwaris after the detailed field checks. On each village map, corridor beginning and
tending chainages will be marked.
c) Design centreline and proposed ROW of project road will be transferred to revenue
maps with the help of marked chainages and affected survey numbers will be
identified. Measurement of the dimensions, lengths etc. of the land to be acquired will
be carried in respect of each survey / sub-survey number.
d) Certified copies of Revenue Tenancy Certificate (RTC) for the affected survey
numbers will be collected showing the details of the survey / sub-survey number, the
area and nature of the land, the last and present owner and the registry record.
e) With the help of concerned patwari, categorization of the land to be acquired will be
carried out in terms of built-up, commercial, irrigated, un-irrigated, barren etc.
f) Land value will be assessed in respect of affected villages separately for each
category of land in following manner:
i. Land sale statistics for past 10 years from Tehsildar’s office.
ii. Prevailing market rates as reported by local people.
On each amendment in the master list, the KP will update the revision status in the Master
List and send the copy to the TL for information. After each amendment in the master list,
the same will be audited by one of the competent person from the monitoring group before
finalization.
The Consultant will prepare and submit separate Land Acquisition reports for each
package as defined by client. In that report the following will be incorporated:
The field works and resulting data will be certified by the office of the Assistant Director of
Lands Records (ADLR) of the Taluka / The office of District Collector (Land Record or
Tehsildar concerned. A representative of the ADLR will accompany the consultants for the
fields works. In case client suggests certain changes after submission of Land acquisition
report, the same will be updated on concerned master document clearly marked as
SUGGESTED BY CLIENT by the KP. The same will be incorporated by concerned
person and will be inspected by the KP along with person from ADLR office and
subsequently by PC for getting client’s approval.
2.10.1 Introduction
Dependability of the project rests on the quick traceability of submitted or received project
information. For this purpose, all concerned project staff shall follow a simple but
exhaustive identification and filing system.
All documents related to this project shall have a number starting with ABCD-EFG which
shall indicate the identification number or job number of the project.
Unless specified otherwise by the client, the documents shall be numbered as indicated
below:
ABCD-EFG/XX/YYY/ZZ
For every field data backup shall be prepared in computer hard disk in a master directory
with sub directory for each group. Manuscripts shall be serially numbered with the cover
sheets having following details and shall be in custody of the KP:
2.10.3.3 Drawings
All project drawings shall be stored in master directory once processed as backup. Also,
similar computer files shall be created in the computer of the KP. Hard copies of the same
shall be in custody of the KP with the cover sheet having the following information:
Title of the project work
Job number of project
Name(s) of associated persons
Date(s) of preparation
Reference to computer file stored in Mater directory
Inception Report
STAGE 2 - FEASIBILITY STUDY & PRELIMINARY SOCIAL
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING
201 :Traffic & Socio-Economic Analysis
309: Preliminary Geometric Design 311: Pavement Design 313 : Preliminary Bridge design
• Plan and Profile • Strengthening • General Arrangement Drawing
• Digital Terrain Model • Rigid/Flexible • Foundation Depth
• Maintenance Requirement • Super Structure Type
310: Traffic Management Scheme
• Preliminary Intersection Design 312 :Drainage Network & 314: Way side Amenities, Toll Plaza,
• Underpass Protection Works Road side Furniture
• Service Road
• Road safety Features
315 : Rate Alalysis 316 : Cost Estimate 317: Updated Economic Analysis
Note:
SM Senior Management -Monitoring Group KP Key Personnel
PC Project Co-ordinator KP (RR) Rehabilitation & Resettlement Expert
KP (HE) Sr Highway Engineer KP (QS) Quantity Surveyor
KP (TE) Sr Traffic Engineer KP (SE) Sr. Survey Engineer
KP (BE) Sr Bridge Engineer HE Highway Engineer (Design/ Field)
KP (PS) Pavement Specialist BE Bridge Engineer (Design/ Field)
KP (ME) Sr Material cum Geotechnical Engineer ME Material Engineer
KP (TS) Transport Economist TE Traffic Engineer
KP (ES) Environmental Specialist FS Field Staff
KP (BT) BOT Expert
Annexure II