This document provides a numerical evaluation scale for a second partial project on a video blog comparing classes in school versus classes online. It evaluates seven aspects of the project on a scale from 0 to 3. The aspects cover requirements like a printed cover page with project details, printed dialogues comparing in-school and online learning, use of comparative and superlative adjectives, intensifiers, and infinitives or "-ing" verbs to describe preferences. It also evaluates collaborative work among team members. The document would numerically score each aspect and total for an overall score out of 21.
This document provides a numerical evaluation scale for a second partial project on a video blog comparing classes in school versus classes online. It evaluates seven aspects of the project on a scale from 0 to 3. The aspects cover requirements like a printed cover page with project details, printed dialogues comparing in-school and online learning, use of comparative and superlative adjectives, intensifiers, and infinitives or "-ing" verbs to describe preferences. It also evaluates collaborative work among team members. The document would numerically score each aspect and total for an overall score out of 21.
This document provides a numerical evaluation scale for a second partial project on a video blog comparing classes in school versus classes online. It evaluates seven aspects of the project on a scale from 0 to 3. The aspects cover requirements like a printed cover page with project details, printed dialogues comparing in-school and online learning, use of comparative and superlative adjectives, intensifiers, and infinitives or "-ing" verbs to describe preferences. It also evaluates collaborative work among team members. The document would numerically score each aspect and total for an overall score out of 21.
This document provides a numerical evaluation scale for a second partial project on a video blog comparing classes in school versus classes online. It evaluates seven aspects of the project on a scale from 0 to 3. The aspects cover requirements like a printed cover page with project details, printed dialogues comparing in-school and online learning, use of comparative and superlative adjectives, intensifiers, and infinitives or "-ing" verbs to describe preferences. It also evaluates collaborative work among team members. The document would numerically score each aspect and total for an overall score out of 21.
NUMERICAL EVALUATION SCALE OF THE 2ND PARTIAL PROJECT:
VIDEO BLOG “CLASS IN SCHOOL VS CLASS ONLINE” SUBJECT: ENGLISH IV GROUP: TEAM: Teacher: Claudia Patricia Velázquez Vargas _________________ _________________ Students:
ASPECTS TO EVALUATE GOOD REGULA SUFF. NO SUF.
R The conversation includes: 3 2 1 0 1. A printed cover of presentation with the title of the project, school, subject, group, students’ names, and due date. 2. After the cover, printed dialogues of four students discussing differences between taking class in school vs taking class at home. 3. 2 or more comparative adjectives marked in the dialogues to compare the learning process in school and the learning process at home. For example: In my opinion, taking class in school is better than taking class since home because I prefer to see the teachers and ask some doubts. 4. 2 or more superlative adjectives to distinguish something that is exceptional. For example: The most stressful thing of taking class since home is that I cannot see my friends. 5. 2 or more intensifiers to make emphasis in some adjectives at the moment of compare the learning process. For example: Isn’t it really interesting to learn the use of new platforms? 6. Two or more infinitives with “to” or “-ing” are used and marked in the dialogues to describe actions you prefer to do in school or in your house. For example: I enjoy working with my friends at school. / I don’t like to stay at home the whole day. 7. Collaborative work. All the team members worked in balance.