Managing People and

Careers_Portfolio
by Elena-Maria Dragean

Submission date: 29-Aug-2019 06:38PM (UTC+0100)

Submission ID: 110360070
File name: Managing_People_and_Careers_Portfolio_59686_614438845.docx (39.19K)
Word count: 3188
Character count: 16725
Managing People and Careers_Portfolio
ORIGINALITY REPORT

15 %
SIMILARITY INDEX
5%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
15%
STUDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to Roehampton University
Student Paper 13%
2
Submitted to The University of the South Pacific
Student Paper 1%
3
www.brightnetwork.co.uk
Internet Source 1%
4
Submitted to Morehouse College
Student Paper <1%

Exclude quotes Off Exclude matches Off

Exclude bibliography Off
Managing People and Careers_Portfolio
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

75
Overall, the portfolio demonstrates a very good
understanding of the required tasks.

/100 The outline of the cover letter is well structured. It is

aligned with the given vacancy.

The CV is well written and follows the structure as

required. However, to improve you should make sure
that the CV and the information outlined on it
matches the vacancy.

The answers in application form demonstrates a good

range of examples

Written communication is largely appropriate apart from

some minor grammatical mismatches.

The reflection of interview and assessment center has

been fairly outlined.

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

PAGE 3
PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

PAGE 10

PAGE 11

PAGE 12

PAGE 13

PAGE 14
RUBRIC: RUBRIC MPANDC 75 / 100

TARGETED (20%) 75 / 100

Targeted to chosen vacancy - language and examples used in the cover letter, cv, and application answers
demonstrate understanding of the requirements of the vacancy and match it effectively - 20%

OUTSTANDING (100- Fully demonstrates understanding of the requirements of the supplied vacancy and
90) 100 matches it effectively
(100)

EXCELLENT (80-89) Mostly demonstrates understanding of the requirements of the supplied vacancy and
85 matches it effectively
(85)

VERY GOOD (70-79) Demonstrates a very good understanding of the requirements of the supplied vacancy
75 and matches it very well
(75)

GOOD (60-69) 65 Demonstrates a good understanding of the requirements of the supplied vacancy and
(65) matches it well

SATISFACTORY (50- Demonstrates some understanding of the requirements of the supplied vacancy and
59) 55 matches it in parts
(55)

ADEQUATE (40-49) 45 An attempt has been made to match answers to the requirements of the supplied
(45) vacancy.

MARGINAL FAIL (30- Little attempt has been made to match answers to the requirements of the supplied
39) 35 vacancy.
(35)

FAIL (20-29) 25 Virtually no attempt has been made to match answers to the requirements of the supplied
(25) vacancy.

NOT DONE 0 Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

(0)

QUAL EXAMPLES (40%) 75 / 100

Experience example descriptions - Quality of the answers to the application questions and of the examples
given in the cover letter - 40%

OUTSTANDING (100- An outstanding range of answers and examples are included. All are relevant, succinctly
90) 100 and clearly expressed. The content is interesting and creative in a way that sells the
(100) applicant extremely well for the vacancy.

EXCELLENT (80-89) An excellent range of answers and examples are included. The majority are relevant,
85 succinctly and clearly expressed. The content is interesting and creative in a way that
(85) sells the applicant excellently well for the vacancy.

VERY GOOD (70-79) A very good range of answers and examples are included. Most are relevant, succinct and
75 clearly expressed and sell the applicant very well for the vacancy.
(75)

GOOD (60-69) 65 A good range of answers and examples are included. Many are relevant, succinct and
(65) clearly expressed and sell the applicant well for the vacancy.

SATISFACTORY (50- A range of answers and examples are included. Some are relevant, succinct and clearly
59) 55 expressed and sell the applicant to some extent for the vacancy.
(55)

ADEQUATE (40-49) 45 A few answers and examples are included. A few are relevant, succinct or clearly
(45) expressed, but does not sell the applicant well.

MARGINAL FAIL (30- Little attempt has been made to include answers and examples and expression is very
39) 35 unclear and they are not relevant. Does not sell the applicant at all.
(35)

FAIL (20-29) 25 Virtually no attempt has been made to include relevant answers and examples.
(25) Expression is extremely unclear. Does not sell the applicant at all.

NOT DONE 0 Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

(0)

FORMAT, SP. (30%) 75 / 100

Presentation (including spelling and grammar) - Quality of vocabulary, phrasing and formatting - 30%

OUTSTANDING (100- No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is outstanding and all the key information
90) 100 can be seen extremely quickly. Vocabulary and phrasing is extremely professional and
(100) entirely appropriate to the vacancy.

EXCELLENT (80-89) No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is excellent and all the key information can
85 be seen very quickly. Vocabulary and phrasing is highly professional and mostly
(85) appropriate to the vacancy. <br />

VERY GOOD (70-79) No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is very clear and most of the key information
75 can be seen very quickly. Vocabulary and phrasing is very professional and generally
(75) appropriate to the vacancy.

GOOD (60-69) 65 No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is clear and much of the key information can
(65) be seen quickly. Vocabulary and phrasing is professional and sometimes appropriate to
the vacancy.

SATISFACTORY (50- No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is consistent but in parts key information is
59) 55 not immediately obvious. Vocabulary and phrasing is occasionally appropriate to the
(55) vacancy.

ADEQUATE (40-49) 45 No grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is inconsistent and key information is difficult
(45) to find. Vocabulary and phrasing is rarely appropriate to the vacancy.

MARGINAL FAIL (30- Contains some grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is poor and key information is
39) 35 very difficult to find. Vocabulary and phrasing is very rarely appropriate to the vacancy.
(35)

FAIL (20-29) 25 Contains many grammar or spelling mistakes. Formatting is very poor and key information
(25) is extremely difficult to find. Vocabulary and phrasing is inappropriate to the vacancy.

NOT DONE 0 Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

(0)

REFL.ABILITY (10%) 75 / 100

Reflective ability - reflections on the mock interview and mock assessment centre are insightful and well-
expressed - 10%

OUTSTANDING (100- Both elements are present. Extremely well expressed, well thought out reflection,
90) 100 demonstrating an extremely clear self-knowledge and understanding of action needed to
(100) improve

EXCELLENT (80-89) Both elements are present.Excellently expressed, well thought out reflection,
85 demonstrating an excellently clear self-knowledge and understanding of action needed to
(85) improve

VERY GOOD (70-79) Both elements are present.Very well expressed, well thought out reflection, demonstrating
75 a very clear self-knowledge and understanding of action needed to improve
(75)

GOOD (60-69) 65 Both elements are present.Well expressed, well thought out reflection, demonstrating a
(65) clear self-knowledge and understanding of action needed to improve

SATISFACTORY (50- Both elements are present.Well expressed, well thought out reflection, demonstrating
59) 55 good self-knowledge with some understanding of action needed to improve
(55)

ADEQUATE (40-49) 45 If only one element is present, but quality is good, then this is an automatic mark. If both
(45) elements are present, then the quality is considered: some reflection is expressed,
demonstrating some self-knowledge with some understanding of action needed to
improve

MARGINAL FAIL (30- If only one element is present and quality reflects the following: very little reflection is
39) 35 expressed, demonstrating very little self-knowledge with very little understanding of action
(35) needed to improve

FAIL (20-29) 25 If only one element is present and quality reflects the following: virtually no reflection is
(25) expressed, demonstrating virtually no self-knowledge with virtually no understanding of
action needed to improve

NOT DONE 0 Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.

(0)