C. Chapter 5

(Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Effectiveness (0.
78) + Cronbach’s Alpha
Value of Efficiency (0.69) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Usability (0.88) +
Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Satisfaction (0.73) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of
Freedom of Risk (0.85) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Context Coverage
(0.82)) /6 = 0.79.
The survey questionnaire or test items has a result of 0.79 in overall
internal consistency, this concludes that the alpha test is reliable and
consistent.
Beta Test
After completing the Alpha test, the beta test or also know as dry-run for
the system will be next process. This phase, the proponents conducted a test
to the identified respondent which is admin aides in HRMO division in Civil
Service Commission Regional Office No. VIII. The result of the survey will be
presented and discussed in a form of pie chart and summary of feedbacks.
A. Reliability
Concise information about the training
33%
67%
Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional
Figure 5.0: Result of question #1
Figure 5.0 shows the result of the Reliability category for question # 1
is about the information of training that is being inputted if it is concise and

71
true. The not functional qualitative description option shows 0% it means that
out of 30 respondent none of them voted. The 33% of the votes are for mostly
functional qualitative description option and 67% is the fully functional
qualitative description option. This only state that more than half of the
respondent agreed that the information inputted to the system about the
training is concise and true.
Unique QR Code for every Participants
100%
The figure 5.1 displays that 100% of the respondent voted the fully
functional qualitative description option. Thus, this means that 100% of the
QR code released by the system is unique to each other.
Resources are Accurate
23%
47%
30%
72
For the figure 5.2, the result of question # 3 of reliability category state
that 0% of the respondent voted for not functional qualitative description
option. 47% of the votes came from functional qualitative description
option, and 30 % is from mostly functional qualitative description option.
The 23% is from fully functional qualitative description option where it has
the 2nd place from the lowest votes. It only means that almost half of the
respondent agree that the resources of the system is accurate but have a
slight lacks.
Notifies the Users if Invalid data is Inputted
33%
67%
Figure 5.3 for reliability category the result for question # 4 has 67%
votes from fully functional, and 33% from mostly functional. This shows
that all the respondent agreed that the system notifies the user if invalid
data is inputted.
B. Maintainability
73
Bugs can be easily Recognized
23%
37%
40%
The figure 6.0 shows the result of question # 1 for the maintainability
category is that all of respondent agreed to the statement that the bugs in
the system can be easily recognized. 23% of the votes came from fully
functional, 40% from mostly functional and 37% from functional.
System can be easily tested
3%
97%
category wherein there is 3% results of mostly functional qualitative
description option and 97% of fully functional qualitative description option.
To sum it up from this results, all respondents agreed to the statement
from the respondents that the system can be easily tested.
74
System runs even if Modification has been made
33%
67%
category wherein 33% voted for mostly functional qualitative description
option and there is 67% for the fully functional qualitative description
option based from the results of the respondents. With this result, it shows
that the system can runs even if modification has been made.
C. Usability
All pages runs without any problem
23%
43%
33%
The figure 7.0 shows the result of question # 1 for the usability
category wherein 44% voted for functional qualitative description option,
33% voted for the mostly functional qualitative description option and 24%
75
voted for the fully functional qualitative description option based from the
results of the respondents. With this result, it shows that all respondents
agreed that all the pages of the system are running without any problems.
Menus and Buttons are working Accordingly and Effectively
20%
80%
category wherein 20% voted for mostly functional qualitative description
option and 80% voted for the fully functional qualitative description option
based from the respondents rating. From this result, it shows that all
respondents agreed that the menus and button are working accordingly
and effectively.
System tracks data/documents
27%
33%
40%
76
category wherein there are 33% voted for the functional qualitative
description option, then 40% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option based and 27% voted for fully functional qualitative
description option from the results of the respondents in the system from
the tracking data or processing documents are functioning. It only means
that all of the respondents agreed that the system tracks the overall data
or processed documents.
System error free
13%
27%
60%
description option, 60% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option and 13% voted for fully functional qualitative description
option based from the respondents rating. Therefore, it shows that based
from the results above, all respondents agreed that the system is error
free.
77
User-friendly
10%
90%
category wherein there are 10% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option and 90% voted for the fully functional qualitative
description option based from the respondents rating. It only means that
the UI of the system is a user-friendly type and with that it shows that all
respondents agreed from it.
System is pleasant to the eye of the user
43%
57%
category wherein there are 43% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
78
description option. With this result, it shows that the system is pleasant to
the eye of the user because all of the respondents agreed from it based
from the rating itself.
System is Responsive
23%
77%
category. There are 23% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option and 77% voted for fully functional qualitative description
option. Therefore, it only means that the system is responsive based from
the result of the respondents
D. Functionality
Compatible to all devices using web-browers
13%
33%
53%
79
The figure 8.0 shows the result of question # 1 for the functionality
description option, then 53% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
option and 13% voted for the fully functional qualitative description option
based from the respondents rating. With this result, it means that the
system is compatible to all device using web browser and with that it
shows that all respondents agreed from the chart above.
Sends notification and QR code after Registering
17% 17%
67%
description option, then, 67% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option based from the respondents rating. Therefore, the
functionality of the system do not have a problem when it comes to
sending notifications and QR code after registration. And with that, the
result above shows that all respondents agreed from it.
80
System run-time is smooth and fast
100%
category wherein 100% voted for the fully functional qualitative description
option based from the respondents rating. It only means that all
respondents agreed that the system run-time is smooth and fast.
Buttons Functioning accordingly
47%
53%
category wherein 47% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option based from the respondents rating. With this result, it
shows that all respondents agreed that the system is functioning
accordingly specifically the buttons, menus and other control.

81
QR Code scanner recognizes the QR code fast
3%
40%
57%
category wherein 4.0% voted for the mostly functional qualitative
description option based from the respondents rating. Therefore with this
result, it only means that all respondents agreed that the QR code scanner
recognizes the QR code fast and with that, the user can easily scanned
their QR code.
E. Security
System ask for username and password
100%
The figure 9.0 shows the result of question # 1 for the security category
wherein 100% voted for the fully functional qualitative description option
82
based from the respondents rating. With this result, it shows that all
respondents agreed that the system is fully functioning every time the
system asks for a username and password for security.
System verifies the account of every users
100%
based from the respondents rating. Therefore, it shows that all respondents
agreed that the system is fully functioned in the account of every user’s
verification.
All documents and data are secured by the system
83
based from the respondents rating. Therefore with this result, it shows that all
respondents agreed that the system is fully functioning and all data and
documents are secured.
To determine the point of scaling for every question, likert Scale, a five-
point scaling was used, in order for the respondents to avoid confusion on
answering and to provide an accurate comparison for every question given in
the evaluation.
In order for the researcher to know the results from the evaluation
conducted, a formula was used for computing the mean for every category of
the evaluation. A limit of scale was used as an indicator that will determine the
qualitative descriptions.
The researcher used the formula x́=∑ fw /n in computing the mean.
where:
x́ is the computed mean
∑ fw is the sum of all the scores in the set
n is the total numbers of respondents
A. Reliability
84
Respondent Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 MEAN
30 4.67 4.97 3.77 4.68 4.51
Table 5.0: Reliability
Realibility is one of the most important quality characteristics of
components, products, and large and complex systems (Elsayed, 2012).
In Table 5.0 shows the questions and measures the system how it is
reliable taking into consideration that the system was well functioning, the
data were delivered and defines the capability of the system to maintain its
services provisions under the defined period of time.
Design for reliability is a collection of techniques that are used to
modify the initial design of a system to improve its reliability (US Department
of Defense, 2011). As shown in the table 5.0, the result of the respondents
answered from Q1 has a mean of 4.67, Q2 has 4.97 mean, Q3 has 3.77
mean, Q4 has 4.68 mean and has an overall mean of 4.51 wherein the
system is mostly reliable to the user.
B. Maintainability
Respondent Q1 Q2 Q3 MEAN
30 3.87 4.97 4.67 4.5
Table 6.0: Maintainability
Software maintenance is the process of modifying software product
either for correction, enhancement, or adaptation. It is an inescapable part of
software lifecycle (M. Kernahan, 2005), which is required to keep the software
product useful and updated with the world changes (S. C. B. d. Souza, et.al,
2005). In table 6.0 statements were formulated to help the researchers how
85
the system able to identify and fix issues and problems in the system
developed about its components and the maintainability characteristics of the
system.
The data presented in table 6.0 showed that the result of the
respondents answered from Q1 has a mean of 3.87, Q2 has 4.97 mean, and
Q3 has 4.67 mean. With this result, the overall mean has 4.5 wherein the
maintainability of the system to identify and fix issues and problems.
C. Usability
Respondent Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 MEAN
30 3.8 4.8 3.93 3.87 4.9 4.57 4.77 4.38
Table 7.0: Usability
Table 7.0 shows items which measures the systems’ usability with
regards to the functionality of the system and refers to the ease of use for the
client in a given function or reservation of the training. Usability consider three
aspects, it should be more efficient to use takes less time to complete to a
particular task, easier to learn: operations can be learned by observing the
object, and more user satisfaction (Nayebi, Desharnis, & Abran, 2012).
Usability is essential to easy to use, efficient, and effective to reach
goals, and satisfactory of users (Hwang & Salvendy, 2010). As shown in the
table 7.0, mostly of the respondents responded that the result from system
answered from Q1 has a mean of 3.8, Q2 has 4.8 mean, Q3 has 3.93 mean,
Q4 has 3.87 mean, Q5 has 4.9 mean, Q6 has 4.57 mean, Q7 has 4.77 mean
and the overall mean has 4.38. Therefore, this shows that the usability of the
system to the users were able to learn and use the system easily.
86
More and more products are advertised as being user-friendly where
once potential user usability as a bonus it is increasingly becoming an
expectation (Jordan, Thomas, McClelland, & Weerdmeester, 2014).
D. Functionality
Respondent Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 MEAN
30 3.8 4.0 5.0 4.53 4.38 4.34
Table 8.0: Functionality
Functionality reflects on how well it complies with or conforms to a
given design, based on functional requirements or specification. It can also be
described as the fitness for purpose of a piece of software or how it compares
to competitors in the marketplace as a worthwhile product (Salleh, Bahari, &
Zakaira, 2017).
In Table 8.0 shows items which measures the system overall
components and its essential functionalities which are working properly and
all the components in every module are in accord in every reservation done
by the users. Majority of the respondents answered from Q1 has a mean of
3.8, Q2 has 4.0 mean, Q3 has 5.0 mean, Q4 has 4.53 mean, Q5 has 4.38
mean and has an overall mean of 4.34. With this result, it only means that the
functionality of the developed system was able to perform the tasks required.
According to (Zhang & Gourley, 2009) functionality mean how a
software or system works, its capabilities, what it allow a user to do and what
it can do for a user to support digital collections management. Functionality is
the ability of the system to do work for which it was intended of all of the
requirements (Rodriguez, Oviedo & Piattini, 2012).
87
E. Security
Respondent Q1 Q2 Q3 MEAN
30 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Table 9.0: Security
Security policy is one important business document of an organization,
as it not only describes the organization’s security goals but also what the
role’s responsibilities toward security of each member of the organization will
have (Aleman, Señor, Lozoya, & Toyal, 2013).
Table 9.0 show items which measures the system security of the users
including the data inputted as well as the documents especially accounts of
every user.
According to (Kruger, H.A. and Kearney, W.D. (2006)), Information
security refers to the protection of the confidentiality, integrity and access to
information Encryption though is a very useful tool for protecting the
confidentiality of information in storage or in transit, weaknesses in encryption
algorithms have permitted intruders access to confidential information (Omar
Safianu, 2016). As shown in the table 8.0 majority of the respondents
answered from Q1 has a mean of 5.0, Q2 has 5.0 mean, Q3 has 5.0 mean
and has an overall mean of 5.0. With this result, it only means that the
security of the developed system was secured enough.
88

C. Chapter 5

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C. Chapter 5

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Effectiveness (0.

78) + Cronbach’s Alpha

Value of Efficiency (0.69) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Usability (0.88) +

Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Satisfaction (0.73) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of

Freedom of Risk (0.85) + Cronbach’s Alpha Value of Context Coverage

The survey questionnaire or test items has a result of 0.79 in overall

to the identified respondent which is admin aides in HRMO division in Civil

presented and discussed in a form of pie chart and summary of feedbacks.

Concise information about the training

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 5.0: Result of question #1

is about the information of training that is being inputted if it is concise and

functional qualitative description option and 67% is the fully functional

training is concise and true.

Unique QR Code for every Participants

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 5.1: Result of question #2

QR code released by the system is unique to each other.

Resources are Accurate

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 5.2: Result of question #3

that 0% of the respondent voted for not functional qualitative description

option. 47% of the votes came from functional qualitative description

option, and 30 % is from mostly functional qualitative description option.

Notifies the Users if Invalid data is Inputted

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 5.3: Result of question #4

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 6.0: Result of question #1

functional, 40% from mostly functional and 37% from functional.

System can be easily tested

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 6.1: Result of question #2

category wherein there is 3% results of mostly functional qualitative

description option and 97% of fully functional qualitative description option.

To sum it up from this results, all respondents agreed to the statement

from the respondents that the system can be easily tested.

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 6.2: Result of question #3

category wherein 33% voted for mostly functional qualitative description

All pages runs without any problem

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.0: Result of question #1

category wherein 44% voted for functional qualitative description option,

Menus and Buttons are working Accordingly and Effectively

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.1: Result of question #2

category wherein 20% voted for mostly functional qualitative description

System tracks data/documents

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.2: Result of question #3

the tracking data or processing documents are functioning. It only means

System error free

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.3: Result of question #4

description option, 60% voted for the mostly functional qualitative

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.4: Result of question #5

respondents agreed from it.

System is pleasant to the eye of the user

Not Functional Slightly Functional Functional Mostly Functional Fully Functional

Figure 7.5: Result of question #6

from the rating itself.