Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
With increasing urban population and increasing transportation problems, the con-
struction of underground spaces and subway is developing. These spaces are often built
close to the ground to make passengers easier to access and reduce investment and
operational costs. These structures are often built in non-cemented ground and with a
low overburden, which will cause sensitivities and problems. The control of settlement
in urban areas is very important. The need for settlement control has been widely
known and new construction methods have been developed (Farias et al. 2004). A key
factor in the successful completion of a project in the tunneling in metropolitan cities is
the proper design and construction method of a tunnel, which will greatly affect the
costs and completion time of the project.
Generally, tunnel construction can be divided into two mechanized and traditional
categories. Several factors are involved in the selection of each of these methods, such
Here a case study is simulated using underground method. The station section has a
width of 17.4 m and a length of 18.4 m. According to studies, Soil in this area is
predominantly SC, SM, GP-GM, GC, GM and GW. In this site, according to the
standard penetration and results of laboratory tests and statistical surveys, regardless of
the first 4-m soil, the soil is relatively homogeneous. The characteristics of the soil
layers are given in Table 1.
3 Construction Process
The station is constructed by NATM and because of large cross section, it is excavated
partially. Different methods of excavating have been developed in this way, like Side
Drift, Ring-Cut and Central Diaphragm methods. In order to determine the sequences
of excavation, according to the soil conditions and stress ratios, Yu and Chern (2007)
proposed the diagram in Fig. 2 based on the span size and the ratio of axial com-
pressive strength to vertical stress enters the tunnel. Based on this diagram, the Side
Drift method is selected for excavating (Fig. 1).
Based on the nature of the problem and the distribution of stresses and displacements
numerical analysis includes two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyzes
(Sharifzadeh et al. 2013). In this study, a cross-section was selected in the middle of the
station and in a place that there aren’t any intersections. It is assumed that there is the plane
strain condition and it is simulated by FLAC 2D software. It is explicit finite difference
program and plastic hardening model, used here, is a new model provided in it.
In many cases, specific assumptions consider the effect of face. In this paper by
using convergence-confinement method (stress relief method) the effect of the third
A New Procedure for Construction Metro Station … 59
dimension is considered. In this theory, the stress entered into the tunnel is gradually
reduced, and by plotting the reduction factor versus distance from the face, the
appropriate reduction factor is obtained (Karakus 2007).
The boundaries are considered far from the model so it is not affected by the
analysis, and, on the other hand, the size of model and meshes are adjusted that the
volume and time of the calculations will not be much (Fig. 3(a)). The ground stress of
first set up is shown in Fig. 3(b). Based on this figure the stresses are uniform and first
setup is correct.
Here, the constitutive model is plastic hardening with Mohr-Coulomb failure cri-
terion. Plastic hardening model is a shear and volumetric hardening constitutive model
for simulating of soil behavior. This model is described by the hyperbolic stress-strain
relationship during drained axial compression, and the dependence of stiffness on stress
is determined by a power. This model also includes shear and volumetric hardening
rules and is based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion (FLAC manual v.8). The
Figure 5 shows the ground curve of the first excavation step (Fig. 4a). This plot
depicts the displacement of the tunnel, without support, behind the face against the
pressure of the ground relative to the in situ stress. According to this curve, as the
tunnel face advances studied section, the internal pressure of the tunnel decreases and
goes far to zero. According to this figure, for the displacement of 10 mm, the stress
relaxation rate is about 30%. Because of simplified assumptions it isn’t accurate and
according to experiences, here it is increased to 40%. Then the supporting system,
simulated by structural element, is installed.
To select excavation schemes 2 items are studied. They are shown in Fig. 6. The
maximum settlement in both is almost the same (Fig. 7), but the amount of forces in
(1) is smaller, so it is selected to implement.
A New Procedure for Construction Metro Station … 61
Pi/p0
ui
The displacement contours and forces of the supporting elements are shown in
Figs. 8, 9, 10 and 11. The maximum displacement in the tunnel crown is 4 cm because the
overburden is 10 meters the displacement is a bit much. Also displacement is moved to the
right of the station, because of the asymmetry of supporting system. The maximum force
of shotcrete was 1300 kN and its maximum moment is 65 kN-m. The maximum force of
the micropiles and nails were 154 kN and 140 kN, respectively (Fig. 12).
62 M. Firouzi and H. Bayesteh
5 Conclusions
In this study, a numerical method has been used to simulate a station with large section
using underground excavation method. The convergence-confinement method (stress
relief method) is used and the effect of the third dimension is considered. We select the
construction scheme based on time and settlement. The results indicated that NATM
method is a applicable for excavation large underground spaces such as a metro station.
Acknowledgments. The authors thanks the personals of the Metro Company for consulting.
References
Farias, M.M.D., Junior, A.H.M., Assis, A.P.D.: Displacement control in tunnels excavated by the
NATM: 3-D numerical simulations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. (2004). https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.tust.2003.11.006
Hoek, E.: Rock-Support Interaction Analysis for Tunnels in Weak Rock Masses. Rocscience Inc,
Canada
Itasca Consulting Group Inc, Sixth Edition (FLAC Version 8.0) February 2016, Minneapolis,
Minnesota
Karakus, M., c, R.J.: Effects of different tunnel face advance excavation on the settlement by FEM.
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00068-3
Kolymbas, D.: Tunnelling and Tunnel Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2003). ISBN: 10 3-540-
25196-0
66 M. Firouzi and H. Bayesteh
Sharifzadeh, M., Kolivand, F., Ghorbani, M., Yasrobi, S.: Design of sequential excavation
method for large span urban tunnels in soft ground – Niayesh tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space
Technol. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.01.002
Vlachopoulos, N., Diederichs, M.S.: Improved longitudinal displacement profiles for conver-
gence confinement analysis of deep tunnels. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. (2009). https://doi.org/
10.1007/s00603-009-0176-4
Yu, C.W., Chern, J.C. Expert system for D&B tunnel construction. Undergr. Space (2007).
ISBN: 978-0-415-40807-3