Professional Documents
Culture Documents
June 2020
Ahmad Tousif Jami
To start, let’s dissect what this is about. In my opinion, rebuttal means an instance of rebutting
evidence or an accusation. In debates, often it’s not possible to give literal rebuttals; so we give
responses and mitigate it/ compare it/ break it down. This means, random direct attacks do not help.
Further, we often fail to take full advantage of it (when we do attack correctly)- and we pay the debt by
losing the debate. This is a very common take; and in this write up I will try to theorize it step by step as
to how to do effective responses to an extent that I found to be effective at even determining the results
of a debate. The guideline consists of 05 tactics and 4 strategy steps. Feel free to google the difference
between strategy and tactics.
05 Tactic(s):
1) Factual Accuracy:
- Question and disprove – conclusion, mechanism.
- Niche examples don’t work
- Intuitive analysis
- Facts/stats
2) Impact Judgment:
- Whether there are other alternatives that gets the job done
- Is this impact really helpful?
- Pointing out the exaggeration of impact
3) Comparative:
- Assuming the impacts are true; compare importance
- Number Game
- Vulnerability Spectrum
- Always incorporate the Trade-offs concerned
4) Strategic Comparative:
- Your worst (guaranteed impact) vs. their best (exaggerated impact)
- Moderate their best case to realistic
- Show why their worst case is more likely
- Show why your best case is more likely to happen
5) Even if:
- Concede to literally everything they show benefits on; then show why your minimum
guaranteed benefit is important
- Must be conclusive and head on
4 Strategy(-ies):
1) Flag post
- What are you responding to
- Specify whether it’s the impact or the mechanism
- If it’s the mechanism, say how that tackles the impact as well
PLEASE TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF AND YOUR MENTAL HEALTH, THANK YOU!