Mrunal (Reasoning) Syllogism (All Cats Are Dogs) - Method, Approach, Techniques, Shortcuts Explained For IBPS, SSC, CSAT and CAT Mrunal

Mrunal [Reasoning] Syllogism (All Cats are Dogs): Method, approach,... http://mrunal.org/2013/01/reasoning-syllogism-all-cats-dogs-approach...
[Reasoning] Syllogism (All Cats are Dogs): Method, approach, techniques,

shortcuts explained for IBPS, SSC, CSAT and CAT
1. Introduction
2. Basics
3. Subject vs Predicate
4. Classification of statement
5. Standard format: conversion
6. No conclusion Combos
7. Conclusive-Combos
8. DemoQ: Crazy men and Women
9. DemoQ: Intelligent Poets and singers
10. CAT-level
DemoQ: Sweet Testing Apples (CAT)
DemoQ: Working mother nurses (CAT)
DemoQ: 4 questions in 1!
11. Special Conversions
12. Complimentary pairs
13. Tricky Situations: Priority order
14. Tricky Situations: 1-Statement Conclusion
15. Summary
Introduction
There are two main types of Syllogism question
2-Statements 3-Statements
Question Statement
A. All cats are dogs
Question Statement:
B. some pigs are cats
I. All cats are dogs
C. no dogs are birdsConclusion
II. All dogs are birdsConclusion:
I. some cats are dogs
I. Some cats are birds
II. no birds are cats
II. Some birds are cats.
III. some pigs are birds
IV. some pigs are not birds
2 Statement Syllogism questions are usually found in IBPS (Bank) and SSC
exams.
UPSC CSAT 2012 exam had quite a few questions on 3 Statement Syllogism.
In CAT exams, they ask 2 Statement Syllogism but they pack 3-4 such
“2-statement” syllogism questions inside one question to make it very
time-consuming process.
In this article, you will learn how to solve the 2 Statement syllogism questions.
1 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
3 Statement syllogism syllogism is explained in separate article (CLICK ME).

(They’re mere an extension of the concepts explained in this article, so first
master the 2-statement technique here.)
There are three methods to solve 2-statement Syllogism questions.
In the exam, Have to think of all possible “Venn-

1. Venn Diagram Diagram” situation and draw them to check every
statement.= time consuming in the exam hall.
Have to mugup some rules, and spend some hours

2. AEIO (analytical
@home to master the “AEIO” conversion in your
Method)
head. But once done, it is easy as a walk in the park.
Usually taught in CAT coaching classes and study

material.
3. Distribution of
Technique is very fast but It excludes the concept of
terms (Tick
“Conversion” and “Complementary cases”, hence
method)
sometimes makes it difficult to solve non-CAT
questions.
The technique explained in this article, is a modified version of AEIO method

combined with the Tick Method. Let’s call it U.P.-U.N. method.
Basics
Subject vs Predicate
Consider this question statement
1. All cats are dogs
2. Some dogs are birds
3. No bird is a pig
4. Some pigs are not birds.
In all such statements, first-term is called subject and second is called predicate.
It doesn’t matter what word is given: Table, Chair, Raja, Kalmadi, Kanimozhi or
Madhu Koda – first term is subject and second term is predicate.
Let’s relook at those question statements
Subject Predicate
1. All cats are dogs Cats Dogs
2. Some dogs are birds Dogs Birds
3. No bird is a pig Bird Pig
4. Some pigs are not birds. Pigs Birds
I hope the Subject vs. Predicate is clear now. Let’s move to second thing
2 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Classification of statement
In syllogism, each statement usually has following format
“xyz subject is/are (not) predicate.”
For example,
Xyz Subject Is/are (+/-not) Predicate

All Cats Are Dogs
Some Pigs Are not birds
Based on “xyz” and “not”, we classify the statements as following
Statement Type Codename

1. All cats are dogs Universal Positive UP
2. Some dogs are birds Particular Positive PP
3. No bird is a pig Universal Negative UN
4. Some pigs are not birds. Particular Negative PN
Please remember following words. Whenever they come, you classify the statement
accordingly.
Universal (positive or
All, every, any, none, not a single, only etc.
negative)
Some, many, a few, quite a few, not many, very little, most Particular (positive or
of, almost, generally, often, freqently, etc. negative)
Standard format: conversion

The standard 2-statement syllogism question format is following:
1. (xyz) “A” is/are (+/- not) “B”
2. (xyz) “B” is/are (+/- not) “C”
So basically it is
1. A—>B
2. B—>C
(read as “A to B then B to C”)
What does this tell us?
Question statements must have ONLY three terms. (A, B and C).
In the exam, if they give you two question statements with four terms then your time is
saved! Just tick the answer “no conclusion can be drawn”.
For example
Question
Answer
statements
1. All cats are No conclusion can be drawn. Because it has four terms (cats,
Dogs dogs, birds, pigs)
2. Some birds are A–>B
pigs C–>D
3 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Anyways back to the topic,

The standard format for question statements is:
1. A—>B 1. First term—>Middle Term

2. B—>C 2. Middle Term—>Third term
But if the given question statements are not given in this format, then we must convert
them into above format. Otherwise we cannot proceed with answer. For example
Given question statements are This must be converted into

1. A—>B 1. A—>B
2. C—>B 2. B—>C
Given question statements are This must be converted into
1. B—>A 1. A—>B
2. B—>C 2. B—>C
Ok, so how to convert the statements?
Universal Positive (UP)

Given Statement Valid conversions Type
Some Cats are dogs Particular Positive (PP)
Given Statement: All Cats are Dogs
Some dogs are cats Particular Positive (PP)
It means UP can be converted into PP.

Please note: if the statement is “Only Dogs are cats”, then better convert it into “All
cats are dogs”. (Only A is B –> All B are A)
Universal Negative (UN)

Some dogs are not Particular Negative
Given Statement: No Cats are cats (PN)
Dogs Universal Negative
No dogs are cats
(UN)
It means UN can be converted into PN or UN.
Particular Positive (PP)

Some Cats are Dogs Some dogs are cats Particular Positive (PP)
It means PP can be converted into PP only.
Particular Negative
Example: Some Cats are not Dogs. In Particular negative statements (PN), no
conversion can be made.
So PN=can’t convert.
To sum up the conversion rules
4 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Type Valid Conversion

Universal Positive (UP) Only PP
Universal Negative (UN) PN or UN
Particular Positive (PP) Only PP
Particular Negative (PN) Not possible.
Please note:
In some lower level exams, sometimes they directly ask about conversion. For
example
Q. What can be concluded from the given statement: “Some Politicians are honest
men.”
Answer choices
1. Some Honest men are not Politicians.

2. All Honest men are not politician
3. Some Honest men are politicians.
4. None of Above.
(Please donot read further, without solving above question.)
Solution
well, the given statement “Some Politicians are honest men.” is a particular positive
statement (PP).
Hence according to our table, it can be converted into PP only. Therefore
Given answer choice Thought process
1. Some Honest men are not

Particular negative (PN), hence eliminate.
Politicians.
2. No Honest men are politicians. Universal Negative, hence eliminate
3. Some Honest men are politicians. PP hence this is correct answer.
–not applicable because C is the correct

4. None of Above.
answer.
In case you are wondering,

Q. Some politicians are honest men.
In above case, can’t the answer be “A”: Some honest men are not politicians?
Well, if you go by Venn Diagram method, it’ll lead to two cases hence it is “doubtful”.
Case #1
Data
Subject (Politicians) 1. Sardar Patel

2. Lal Bahadur Shastri
5 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
3. Raja
4. Kalmadi
1. Sardar Patel
Predicate (Honest Men)
In above situation, can you say “Some honest men are not politicians”?
Well you can’t say that. Because both Honest men (Sardar and Shastri) are in politician
set.
Case #2
Data
1. Sardar Patel
Subject (Politicians)
3. Raja
4. Kalmadi
1. Sardar Patel
Predicate (Honest Men)
3. Bhagat Singh
4. ChandraSekhar Azad
In above situation, can you say “Some honest men are not politicians”?
Yes you can. Because two Honest men (Bhagat Singh and Azad) are not in
politician set.
The point is, whenever “two cases” are possible, you cannot ‘safely’ conclude
one statement.
Hence, if the statement is
Some “A” are “B”–> it doesn’t mean Some “B” are not “A”.
The only valid conclusion in above case is :Some “B” are “A”.
Therefore Particular Positive (PP) statement can be converted into Particular Positive
(PP) statement only.
Similarly
Type of Statement Valid Conversion Path

Only PP
Universal Positive (UP) A to B
Some Cats (A) are dogs. (B)
All cats(A) are dogs (B) B to A
Some dogs (B) are cats. (A)
Universal Negative (UN) PN :Some Dogs (B) are not Cats (A). B to A
6 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
No Cats(A) are dogs (B) UN: No Dogs (B) are cats. (A)
Particular Positive (PP)

Only PP: Some dogs (B) are cats(A) B to A
Some cats (A) are dogs (B)
Particular Negative (PN) Not possible. –
Anyways back to the topic, what are we discussing?
1. Topic of discussion is: How to solve 2 statement syllogism question

2. Subject vs predicate
3. Type of statements (UP, UN, PP, PN)
4. Standard format and conversion.
The standard question format is

A–>B
B–>C
If the given question doesn’t have statements in âbove standard format, then we must
convert them into standard format. Only then we can proceed further.
So far, We constructed our shortcut table on how to convert the statements. Now
let’s try some examples

Question statements Conversion?
1. All Cats are dogs(B)
Already in standard format (A to B and then B to C)
2. Some dogs(B) are not
hence no need to convert.
pigs.
No need to convert any statement.
1. Some dogs(B) are not
Just exchange the position of first and second statement.
pigs.
2. Some dogs(B) are not pigs.
Have to convert, because not in standard format.1.All
1. All Cats are dogs (B)
cats(A) are dogs(B)
2. All pigs are dogs(B)
2.Some dogs(B) are pigs(C). (Rule UP-> only PP)
Now coming to the heart of the matter: how to solve the (stupid) 2 statement syllogism
question?
No conclusion Combos
Here are the non-conclusion combos when two question statements are in following
format.
First statement (A to B) Second statement (B to C) Answer

Particular Positive (PP) No conclusion
Universal Positive (UP)
Particular Negative (PN) No conclusion
Universal Negative (UN) No conclusion
Universal Negative (UN)
Particular Positive (PP) Particular Positive (PP) No conclusion
7 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM

Particular Negative (PN) Any other (UP, UN, PP, PN) No conclusion
^does it look difficult?

Not really. Let’s condense this table into mug-up rules.
1. UP’s politicians hate giving particular statements (both positive and negative).
E.g. they donot reveal their clear position on FDI in retail until the 11th hour.
2. United Nations hates negativity. (both Universal and particular)
3. Pritish Nandy hates everybody.
4. Two-negatives=no conclusion. (although implicit in 2+3)
5. Two particulars=no conclusion. (although implicit in 1+3)
Please note: in âbove situations definite conclusion is impossible. However,

sometimes two answer choices are still possible “either a or b”.
That concept is called “Complimentary pairs”. We’ll learn about it at the bottom of this
article.
For the moment, let’s not complicate the matters with complimentary pairs.
Ok back to topic, when you face a “Two-statement syllogism question”? you’ll follow
these steps:
1. first, make sure it contains only three terms (ABC) (else no conclusion.)
2. Make sure question statements are in standard format (A to B then B to C). If not
in standard format, then re-arrange.
3. Classify the question statements. (UP, UN, PP, PN)
4. Check if the question statements have no conclusion combos (Âbove rules)
if above things donot yield an answer, then we’ve to think about what will be the
“conclusion(s)”?
Conclusive-Combos
If you’ve followed above steps, then question statements in the format “A to B and
then B to C.”
Second statement (B to
First statement (A to B) Conclusion
C)
Universal Positive (UP) Universal Positive (UP) (A to C)
Universal Positive (UP) Universal Negative Universal Negative (UN) (A to
(UN) C)
Universal Negative Universal positive (UP) Particular Negative (PN). (C to
(UN) Particular Positive (PP) A)
Universal Positive (UP) Particular Positive (PP) (A to C)
Particular Positive (PP) Universal Negative Particular Negative (PN) (A to
(UN) C)
As you can see from above table,

The answer statement is usually in the format of A to C. with exception when first
question statement is Universal Negative (UN).
8 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Let’s condense this table into mug-up rules as well.
Conclusive-Combos In your head, visualize

If Uttar Pradesh meets Uttar Pradesh, then its size doesn’t
1. UP+UP=UP
increase.
If Uttar Pradesh meets United Nations then its size

2. UP+UN=UN
increases and it becomes United Nations.
United Nations Secretary Ban Ki Moon is in very positive
3. UN+ mood. But he meets another positive person, and his
(UP/PP)=PN attitude is totally reversed- he becomes particularly
negative! (reversed =C to A)
When Mr.PP observes the universe via NASA telescope,
4. PP+
his mood becomes positive or negative depending on the
(UP/UN)=PP/PN
mood of universe.
Try a question from SSC-CGL (Tier-I, 2010) exam,
DemoQ: Crazy men and Women

Question Statements
1. All men are women.

2. All women are crazy.
Conclusion
1. All Men are crazy

2. All the crazy are men
3. Some of the crazy are men
4. Some of the crazy are women
Answer
a. None of the conclusion follows

b. All conclusions follow
c. Only 1, 3 and 4 follow
d. Only 2 and 3 follow
(I suggest you pause here. First try to solve it on your own, without directly reading
the solution. If you’ve difficulty, re-read rules given above)
Solution
Our standard operating procedure (SOP)

Question Statements
1. All men are women.

2. All women are crazy.
9 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
First step: make sure four terms are not given = check. Only three terms (men, women,
crazy)
Second step, make sure they’re in standard format (A to B and then B to C): Check yes
they’re.
Hence conversion is not required.
1. All men(A) are women. (B) (UP)
2. All women(B) are crazy.(C) (UP)
Third step, classify the statements.
1. All men are women. Universal Positive (UP)
2. All women are crazy. Universal Positive (UP)
Fourth step: check the combo for question statements.
Well, since it is UP+UP= its size doesn’t increase. Hence conclusion should be
UP. (A to C) meaning All men(A) are crazy.(C)
Check the answer statements.
1. All Men are

Correct.
crazy
Recall that “conversion table”.Universal Positive (UP) can be

converted only into Particular Positive (PP).
Since All men are crazy => Some Crazy are men.
2. All the crazy But we cannot say All crazy are men. So this option is false.
are men
If you apply common sense at this stage: well, 1st statement
correct, and 2nd statement is false, hence answer is (C): only 1,
3 and 4 follow!
3. Some of the
crazy are Correct because of “conversion table”
men
4. Some of the Given question statement : All women are crazy. (Universal
crazy are positive). If we apply conversion table (UP=> PP) then Some
women Crazy are women. Hence this statement is also correct.
10 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Final answer (C): only 1, 3 and 4 follow

If you’re still staggering, I suggest you go through those rules again, note them down
in a diary in your own words and language, revise a few times. Then try next question
DemoQ: Intelligent Poets and singers

Question Statements (SSC-CPO exam)
1. All poets are intelligent

2. All singers are intelligent.
Conclusion
1. all singers are poets

2. some intelligent persons are not singers
Answer choices
a. only conclusion one follows

b. only conclusion two follows
c. either conclusion one or conclusion two follows
d. neither follows
solution
first step: does the question statements have only three terms? Check: Yes. Singers,
poets, intelligent. Good, proceed with next step.
Second step: Are the question statements given in standard format (A to B then B to
C)?
Check. Nope
1. All poets (A) are intelligent (B)

2. All singers (C) are intelligent. (B)
Then we have to convert it into standard format. And since both statements are
universal positive, we don’t need to worry about which statement to convert first? (that
“priority order”, more about it, explained at the bottom of this article.)
Second statement is universal positive (UP), according to our table, we can only
convert it into particular positive (PP) therefore
All singers (C) are intelligent. (B)==> Some intelligent persons(B) are singers.(C)
Now the new question statements, in the standard format (A to B then B to C) are
1. All poets are intelligent (B)
2. Some intelligent persons(B) are singers.
Third step, classify the question statements
question statement type

1. All poets(A) are intelligent (B) Universal positive (UP)
2. Some intelligent persons(B) are singers.(C) Particular positive (PP)
Fourth step, apply the combo rules.
11 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Since UP’s politicians hate particular statements (both positive and negative), hence no
conclusion can be drawn. That means we cannot connect A to C or C to A.
Now check the Answer statements
i. all singers(C) are

False. UP+PP=no conclusion, as explained above.
poets (A)
Check the second original question statement : All singers

are intelligent. (Universal positive –UP).
ii. some intelligent
According to our conversion table, UP can be converted
persons are not
into particular positive (PP) only. But this answer
singers
statement (II) is a particular negative statement. Hence
this is also false.
Final answer: (D) neither follows.
CAT-level
Same UP-UN Concept but they pack 3-4 or more syllogism questions into one
question to test your speed, not just your understanding. for example:
DemoQ: Sweet Testing Apples (CAT)

given question has five statements followed by options containing three statements put
together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, where
the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
Question statements (CAT 1999)
a. Apples are not sweet

b. Some apples are sweet
c. All sweets are tasty
d. Some apples are not tasty
e. No apple is tasty
answer choices
1. cea
2. bdc
3. cbd
4. eac
solution and approach
we’ve to check the given options one by one.

Option (i). CEA. Meaning we’ve to take C as our statement (I), E as our Statement (II)
and then observe, if statement (A) can be concluded from C and E.
C All sweets are tasty Universal positive

E No apple is tasty. Universal negative
12 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
A Apples are not sweet Universal negative
In the actual CAT exam, we cannot afford to waste time in actually converting all
statements and checking them.
Here is the fast approach
1. three terms?= yes
2. in standard format? No. but we can convert second (UN) into another UN and then
combo rule is UP+UN=UN.
Hence this answer choice (CEA) is correct.
Final answer (i) CEA
DemoQ: Working mother nurses (CAT)

question statement answer choices
a. No mother is a nurse.
b. Some Nurses like to work 1. ABE
c. No woman is prude 2. CED
d. Some prude are also nurses 3. FEB
e. Some nurses are women 4. BEF
f. All women like to work
Check the answer choices one by one.
i. ABE
A (Statement I) No mother is a nurse. (UN)
B (Statement II) Some Nurses like to work
E (Conclusion) Some Nurses are women.
This is invalid. Because Statement I and II have three terms (Mother, Nurse and work)
while given conclusion statement adds fourth new term “women”
Move to next choice.
ii. CED
Statement Type
C (Statement I) No woman is prude Universal negative
E (Statement II) Some nurses are women Particular positive
D (conclusion) Some prude are also nurses Particular positive
Question statements have three terms? Yes (women, prude, nurses)

Are they in standard format (A to B then B to C?) nope.
No woman(B) is prude Universal negative

Some nurses are women(B) Particular positive
change position of first and second statement.

1. Some nurses(A) are women(B)
2. No woman(B) is prude(C)
13 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
question statement type

1. Some nurses(A) are women(B) Particular positive (PP)
2. No woman(B) is prude(C) Universal negative (UN)
Apply the combo rules

PP+UN=??
When Mr.PP observes the universe via NASA telescope, his mood becomes
particularly negative or positive depending on the mood of universe. Hence
PP+UN=PN.(A to C)
So legitimate conclusion is “Some Prune arenot nurses”.
But Check the given conclusion statement: “Some prude are also nurses.” It is
Particular positive (PP).
But According to conversion table, PN cannot be converted. So we cannot say
that since “Some prune are not nurses, that means some prunes are nurses!”
Therefore given answer choice(ii) CED is false because D cannot be concluded
from C+E.
Move to the next answer choice.
Actual thought process: three terms =yes. Standard form=no. rearrange. But
PP+UN=PN, can’t be converted to PP. Hence false.
iii.FEB
Statement Type
F (Statement I) All women like to work Universal positive UP
E (Statement II) Some nurses are women Particular positive PP
B (conclusion) Some nurses like to work Particular positive PP
three terms =yes. Standard form=no. but no need to convert, just exchange position of
statement I and II.
Some nurses(A) are women(B) Particular positive PP

All women(B) like to work (C) Universal positive UP
Apply combo rule, again same situation

When Mr.PP observes the universe via NASA telescope, his mood becomes
particularly positive or negative depending on the mood of universe. Hence
PP+UP=PP.(A to C).
Some nurses(A) like to work(C). Done! This is same as the given conclusion (B)
Therefore, final answer is (iii) FEB.
DemoQ: 4 questions in 1!
This one is from CAT-1999.
Each of the given question statement as three segments. Choose the alternative where
third segment of the statement can be logically be used using the both preceding two
but not just from one of them
Question statements
14 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
a. all dinosaurs are prehistoric creatures. Water buffaloes are not dinosaurs. Water
buffaloes are not prehistoric creatures
b. all politicians are frank. No frank people are crocodiles. No crocodiles are
politicians
c. no diamond is quartz. No opal is quartz. Diamonds are opals.
d. All monkeys like bananas. Some Joes like bananas. Some Joes are monkeys.
Answer choice
i. Only C
ii. Only B
iii. Only A and D
iv. Only B and C
Approach
Three terms yes. Standard format =No.Both question statements
are Universal negative. We can convert either of them, into UN or
C. Diamonds,
PN. But in any case, both question statements will remain
Quartz, Opals.
negative. And Two negatives=no conclusion. So “C” is not
possible. Hence answer choice (i) and (iv) eliminated.
Already in three terms standard format.UP+UN=size enlarged and
B. Frank
becomes UN.
politicians and
So conclusion should be “No crocodile is politician” so this
crocodiles
statement is correct. Hence answer choice (ii).
Final answer: (ii) only B.

The End?
No. Picture abhi baaki hai mere dost: just three more concepts before concluding the
Two-Statement Syllogism
Special Conversions
Recall that when question statements are not in standard format (A to B then B to C),
in that case we’ve to convert them according to conversion table. Here are some
special cases.
Conversion (all applicable to all given

Given Question statement Type
question statements)
None but Politicians are 1. All honest(people) are politicians UP

honest.
No one else but Politicians
2. No non-politician is honest.
are honest.
3. No honest (people) are UN
Only politicians are
non-politicians.
honest.
Politicians alone are
honest 4. Some politicians are honest PP
15 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Second concept:
Complimentary pairs
Earlier we saw there are five no-conclusion combos
1. UP’s politicians hate giving particular statements (both positive and negative).
E.g. they donot reveal their clear position on FDI in retail until the 11th hour.
2. United Nations hates negativity of any type. (both Universal and particular)
4. Two-negatives=no conclusion.
5. Two particulars=no conclusion.
For example
Question statement 1. Some Politicians are male.2. Some males are honest.
Conclusion 1. Some Politicians are honest.2. No Politicians are honest.
Answer choice
a. Only 1 follows
b. Only 2 follows
c. Either 1 or 2 follows
d. Neither follows
Apply the standard operating procedure:

Three terms? Check: yes
Are they in standard format? A to B then B to C? check. Yes
Then classify the statements
1. Some Politicians(A) are males(B) Particular positive.

2. Some males(B) are honest(C) Particular positive.
From the given rules, Two particulars = No conclusion!

But please observe one of the answer choice (C)= Either 1 or 2 follows.
Consider these cases
Case#2
Politicians Males honest
1. Sardar Patel 1. Sardar Patel

5. Sardar Patel
2. Lal Bahadur Shastri 2. Lal Bahadur Shastri
3. Raja 3. Bhagat Singh
7. Raja
4. Kalmadi 4. ChandraSekhar Azad
8. Kalmadi
5. Bhagat Singh 5. Sarojini Naidu
9. Sheila
6. ChandraSekhar Azad 6. Mother Teresa
In this case#1: some politicians (Sardar and Shastri) are honest.
16 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
So “conclusion (1) may be possible.”
Case#2
Politicians Males honest
1. Raja 1. Bhagat Singh

1. Raja
2. Kalmadi 2. ChandraSekhar Azad
2. Kalmadi
3. Bhagat Singh 3. Sarojini Naidu
3. Sheila
4. ChandraSekhar Azad 4. Mother Teresa
In this case, No politician is honest.

So “conclusion (2) may be possible.”
Therefore answer becomes “Either 1 or 2 follows”
Such syllogism-situations are called “complementary”.
You’ve to check following things, before thinking about “complementary” cases.
1. Two statements with three terms? Yes

2. Question statements are given in standard format (A to B Then B to C). if not,
then rearrange or convert them.
3. Classify the statements (UP, UN, PP, PN)
4. Apply the rules. Get the answer.
5. If Step #4 gives “No conclusion” AND one of the answer choice is in the format
of “Either I or II follows”, only then check for complemantary case.
Checklist: complementary case
1. Two answer choices have same subject and predicate.
Applicable Not applicable

1. Some Politicians are honest.2. No Honest
1. Some Politicians are honest.2. No
are Politicians.In first statement,
Politicians are honestBecause both
subject=Politician but in second statement,
have common subject (politician)
subject= Honest. Hence complemantary case
and common predicate (honest)
not possible.
2). The answer choice combo must be either of these three
Answer choice combo example

1. All Politicians are honest.
Uttar Pradesh (UP) + Pritish Nandy (PN)
2. Some Politicians arenot honest
1. Some Politicians are honest.
PP + Pritish Nandy (PN)
2. Some Politicians arenot honest
1. Some Politicians are honest.
PP + United Nations (UN)
2. No Politicians are honest
When these two conditions are met, then answer would be “Either (I) or (II) follows.”
Priority order
17 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
You know that when Question statements are not in standard format (A to B Then B to
C), we must convert them. But here is a thing to keep in mind. Consider these
statements
Question statements:
1. All Dogs are Cats.
2. Some Dogs are Pigs.
Common term or middle term is Dogs. So that’s our “B”.
1. All Dogs(B) are Cats.
2. Some Dogs(B) are Pigs.
We can convert it via two routes
Route #1 Route #2
We’ll re-order the statements. (that is interchange thee
Just convert the first position of both statements)
statement. 1. Some dogs(B) are pigs
1. Some Cats are dogs. 2. All Dogs(B) are Cats
(Rule: UP to PP) Now we’ll convert the first statement.
2. Some Dogs are pigs. 1. Some pigs are Dogs (B) (Rule: PP to PP)
2. All dogs (B) are cats.
Both routes are valid.

Now the question is, which route should be preferred?
The priority order is:
1) Particular positive (PP) >> 2) Universal Negative (UN) >> 3) Universal Positive
(UP)
Note: we’ve not included Particular Negative (PN) in this order because PN cannot be
converted. So according to this priority order PP>UN>UP, route #2 is the more
suitable approach. (although such complications don’t usually arise in most of the
questions).
Tricky Situations: Priority order

Consider this scenario
Question statements Conclusion
1. All women(B) are birds 1. Some birds are tree

2. Some women(B) are tree 2. All trees are bird.
As you can see, the question statements are not in standard format (A to B then B to
C).
So, which question statement to convert?
First the wrong approach.
WR Since question statements are not in standard format (A to B then B to C),

hence we’ll convert first statement. (UP to PP)After conversion
18 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
1. Some birds(A) are women (B)

O 2. Some women(B) are tree
N
Both question statements are particular, hence final answer=No conclusion.
(please note: this approach is wrong, because we’ve not followed the priority
G
order).
Now the correct approach
The priority order for Statement conversion is PP>UN>UP.Meaning, if there are

two question statements, and we’ve to convert one of them to make it a standard
format=> then we’ll convert Particular positive statement first.
So in the given case
1. All women(B) are birds

2. Some women(B) are tree
CO Convert second statement. (PP to PP)
R
1. All women(B) are birds.
2. Some trees are women(B).
R
Now exchange positions of question statements
E
1. Some trees are women(B). (PP)
C
2. All women(B) are birds. (UP)
T
Now they’re in standard format, apply combo rule: PP+UP=PP (Nasa telescope
rule!)
Hence conclusion is
Some trees are birds. (PP)
We can also say that Some birds are trees. (PP to PP conversion). Therefore
answer is (1)
Moral of the story: Conversion priority: PP>UN>UP. Especially when you’re getting
PP+PP= no conclusion after conversion.
Tricky Situations: 1-Statement Conclusion

Question statements Conclusion
1. All the flowers are leaves.(B) (UP) 1. Some birds are flowers
2. Some leaves(B) are birds (PP) 2. Some leaves are flowers
Question statement contains only three terms=yes.
19 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
Are they in standard format? (A To B then B to C?) =Yes.
Apply combo rules: UP+PP=No conclusion because Uttar Pradesh’s politicians hate
particular statements.
But here’s the catch. Observe the conclusion statements carefully
Conclusion
Thought process
statement
1. Some birds
Not possible because combo rule.
are flowers
first question statement says All flowers are leaves. If you apply
2. Some
the conversion rule UP->PP, thenAll flowers are leaves=> Some
leaves are
leaves are flowers. Hence this conclusion is correct, although it
flowers
did not employ both question statements.
Moral of the story: Read terms (subject-predicate) of conclusion statements.
Summary
What to do when 2-statement syllogism question is given?
1. They must have only three terms (A, B and C)

2. Are the question statements in standard format (A to B then B to C)? if no, then
refer to following conversion table. (important: priority order for conversion is
PP>UN>UP.)
Type Valid Conversion

Universal Positive (UP) Only PP
Universal Negative (UN) PN or UN
Particular Positive (PP) Only PP
Particular Negative (PN) Can’t do.
3. Classify the Question statement (UP, UN, PP, PN)

4. Apply the combo rules on Question statements.
No conclusion Yes conclusion
1. UP’s politicians hate giving 1. If Uttar Pradesh meets Uttar Pradesh,

particular statements (both then its size doesn’t increase.
positive and negative). E.g. they (UP+UP=UP)
donot reveal their clear position 2. If Uttar Pradesh meets United Nations
on FDI in retail until the 11th then size increases and it becomes
hour. (UP+PP/PN=NO) United Nations. (UP+UN=UN)
2. United Nations hates negativity. 3. United Nations Secretary Ban Ki
Moon is in very positive mood. But he
20 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
meets another positive person, and his

(both Universal and particular)
attitude is totally reversed- he
(UN+UN/PN=NO)
becomes particularly negative!
(reversed =C to A). (UN+UP/PP=PN)
(first statement is PN=NO,
4. When Mr.PP observes the universe via
Irrespective of second
NASA telescope, his mood becomes
statement.)
particularly positive or negative
4. Two-negatives=no conclusion.
depending on the mood of universe.
5. Two particulars=no conclusion.
(PP+UP/UN=PP/PN)
5. (rarely required): if no-conclusion and “either or” given in answer, then check for
Complimentary case.
This concludes the discussion on 2 statement Syllogism question.

In later article, we’ll see the 3-statement syllogism. It is basically extention of the same
UP-UN method that we learned here. However, to quickly solve 3-statements, first you
must become a master of 2-statement. So, practice as many sums as you can, from any
of the following books.
21 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM
For the whole archive of Aptitude related articles, visit Mrunal.org/aptitude

If you wish to discuss any Syllogism questions, post them on following thread
Mrunal.org/aptitude: (No registration necessary. Just use your gmail/ facebook
account)
URL to article: http://mrunal.org/2013/01/reasoning-syllogism-all-cats-

dogs-approach-shortcut-technique-explained-ibps-ssc-csat-cat.html
Posted By On 05/01/2013 @ 22:27 In the category Aptitude
22 of 22 6/5/2014 2:34 PM

Mrunal (Reasoning) Syllogism (All Cats Are Dogs) - Method, Approach, Techniques, Shortcuts Explained For IBPS, SSC, CSAT and CAT Mrunal

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mrunal (Reasoning) Syllogism (All Cats Are Dogs) - Method, Approach, Techniques, Shortcuts Explained For IBPS, SSC, CSAT and CAT Mrunal

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mrunal [Reasoning] Syllogism (All Cats are Dogs): Method, approach,... http://mrunal.org/2013/01/reasoning-syllogism-all-cats-dogs-approach...

[Reasoning] Syllogism (All Cats are Dogs): Method, approach, techniques,

3 Statement syllogism syllogism is explained in separate article (CLICK ME).

There are three methods to solve 2-statement Syllogism questions.

In the exam, Have to think of all possible “Venn-

Have to mugup some rules, and spend some hours

Usually taught in CAT coaching classes and study

The technique explained in this article, is a modified version of AEIO method

Xyz Subject Is/are (+/-not) Predicate

Based on “xyz” and “not”, we classify the statements as following

Statement Type Codename

Standard format: conversion

Anyways back to the topic,

1. A—>B 1. First term—>Middle Term

Given question statements are This must be converted into

Ok, so how to convert the statements?

Universal Positive (UP)

It means UP can be converted into PP.

Universal Negative (UN)

It means UN can be converted into PN or UN.

Particular Positive (PP)

It means PP can be converted into PP only.

Type Valid Conversion

1. Some Honest men are not Politicians.

(Please donot read further, without solving above question.)

Given answer choice Thought process

1. Some Honest men are not

2. No Honest men are politicians. Universal Negative, hence eliminate

3. Some Honest men are politicians. PP hence this is correct answer.

–not applicable because C is the correct

In case you are wondering,

Subject (Politicians) 1. Sardar Patel

Hence, if the statement is

Type of Statement Valid Conversion Path

Particular Positive (PP)

Particular Negative (PN) Not possible. –

Anyways back to the topic, what are we discussing?

1. Topic of discussion is: How to solve 2 statement syllogism question

The standard question format is

let’s try some examples

First statement (A to B) Second statement (B to C) Answer

Particular Negative (PN) No conclusion

^does it look difficult?

Please note: in ^above situations definite conclusion is impossible. However,

As you can see from above table,

Let’s condense this table into mug-up rules as well.

Conclusive-Combos In your head, visualize

If Uttar Pradesh meets United Nations then its size

Try a question from SSC-CGL (Tier-I, 2010) exam,

DemoQ: Crazy men and Women

1. All men are women.

1. All Men are crazy

a. None of the conclusion follows

Our standard operating procedure (SOP)

1. All men are women.

1. All men(A) are women. (B) (UP)

2. All women(B) are crazy.(C) (UP)

Third step, classify the statements.

1. All men are women. Universal Positive (UP)

2. All women are crazy. Universal Positive (UP)

Fourth step: check the combo for question statements.

Check the answer statements.

1. All Men are