Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Systems
EiT-M, School of Civil Engineering, IEC
April, 2020
Chapter Three
Fig. 5: Filter
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Wetting patterns
• Unlike surface and sprinkler irrigation, drip irrigation only wets part of the soil root zone.
• This may be as low as 30% of the volume of soil wetted by the other methods.
• The wetting patterns which develop from dripping water onto the soil depend on discharge and soil type.
• Figure below shows the effect of changes in discharge on two different soil types, namely sand and clay.
Fig. 6:Wetting patterns for sand and clay soils with high and low discharge rates
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Wetting patterns
• The shape of the distribution of water when applied from a point source in soil depends on
soil characteristics and gravity force.
• The soil texture,
• The soil horizontal and vertical permeability,
• Capillary suction,
• Presence or absence of impervious layers, Influence the wetting pattern of soil.
• The volume of water applied per irrigation,
• The rate of application and
• The initial moisture content
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Wetting patterns
• In the fine textured soil such as clay and clay loam, the capillary forces are
strong and gravity force can be considered negligible.
• The horizontal movement may be faster than the downward.
In heavy soil
• The wetting pattern usually takes the shape of a bulb
• In the soils in between the fine and light soils the influence of capillary
suction and gravity are almost equal. Therefore, the wetting pattern will
have more or less equal horizontal and vertical elongation leads to pear
In medium soil shape
• In light soil the capillary forces are small and the gravity force has some
influence on movement of water.
• The downward movement is faster than horizontal, which causes a wetting
pattern of more elongation to downward
In light soil
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
• However, the soils are very complicated in nature. Soil characteristics are seldom
homogeneous. Therefore, it is very difficult to predict the exact shape of the wetting pattern.
• Schwarzman and Zur (1985) proposed the following empirical equations correlating depth
and width of the wetted soil volume to emitter discharge, saturated hydraulic conductivity of
soil and volume of water in the soil volume.
C 0.45
z= K1 Vw 0.63 s
q
0.22 Cs −0.17
w= K 2 Vw
q
Where, z = vertical distance to wetting front, m , w = wetted width or diameter of wetting front,
m, K1= empirical coefficient = 29.2, Vw= volume of water applied, liter, Cs = saturated
hydraulic conductivity of the soil, m/s, q = emitter discharge, l/h, K2= empirical co-efficient =
0.031, K3= empirical co-efficient = 0.0094
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Selection of number of emitters per plant
Proportion of area to be wetted
• The percentage of area or soil volume of potential root zone to be wetted is important in
designing drip system.
• The percentage of wetting varies widely from crop to crop. It is reported that the percentage
of wetting may be as low as 25 percent (tree plants) to hundred percent to very close
growing crops (vegetables).
• Keller and Karmeli (1974) developed a guide for estimating the wetted volume as
represented in Table 1.
• Table 1 is made with the assumption of approximately 40 mm of water application per
irrigation with 0.3m fairly uniform penetration of water beneath the soil, minimum
percentage of wetting as 33 percent for single, straight, equally spaced lateral lines,
uniformly spaced distributors for coarse, medium and light soils and for various discharges.
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Table 1: Guide for determining values of P (percentage of soil wetted by various discharges)
Effective Emission point discharge
spacing Less than 1.5 LPH 2 LPH 4 LPH 8 LPH More than 12 LPH
between
laterals Sl, m Recommended spacing of emission points along the lateral for coarse, medium and fine texture soils- Se, m
C M F C M F C M F C M F C M F
0.2 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.3 1.6 2.0
Percentage of soil wetted
0.8 38 88 100 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
1.0 33 70 100 40 80 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
1.2 25 58 92 33 67 100 67 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
1.5 20 47 73 26 53 80 53 80 100 80 100 100 100 100 100
2.0 15 35 55 26 40 60 40 60 80 60 80 100 80 100 100
2.5 12 28 44 16 32 48 32 48 64 48 64 80 64 80 100
3.0 10 25 37 13 26 40 26 40 53 40 53 67 53 67 80
3.5 9 20 31 11 23 34 23 34 46 34 46 57 46 57 68
4.0 8 18 28 10 20 30 20 30 40 30 40 50 40 50 60
4.5 7 16 24 9 18 26 18 26 36 26 36 44 36 44 53
5.0 6 14 22 8 16 24 16 24 32 24 32 40 27 34 40
6.0 5 12 18 7 14 20 14 20 27 20 27 34 27 34 40
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
• Table 1 can be used by entering from the left column where spacing of the laterals are given.
• On the same line of lateral spacing the wetted percentage, P, is read in the concerned column of
certain discharge and soil type.
• Say, the spacing between the laterals is 1m. The corresponding wetted percentages are 70, 80 and
100 for medium textured soil and 1.5, 2.0 and 4.0 l/h discharge respectively.
Double lateral for each row of plants
• In tree plants, sometime the laterals are required to be used in pairs taking the plant rows in between
or the distributors used in cluster around the plant instead of using the equally spaced on the lateral.
• In such situation the value of P obtained from Table 1 may be adjusted using the following equation:
P1 S1 +P2 S2
P=
Sr
Where, Sl= the inner spacing (m) between the pairs of laterals, which should be taken from Table 1,
corresponding to P =100%, the value for given emitter discharge rate, soil type and spacing, 𝑃1 is taken
from Table 1 for S1, S2 is spacing between outer rows of laterals, P2 is taken from Table 1 for S2,
Sr is the spacing between the rows of plants, Se is spacing between the distributors in a lateral
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Example 1
Design the spacing of inner rows of laterals and find the percentage of wetting of field for tree
plants spaced 6mx6m in medium textured soil. The available discharge rate of distributors is 8
l/h.
Example 2
Tree plants are cultivated at coarse textured soil with 6.5mx6.5m spacing. The distributors
fitted to the laterals pass through the plant rows and spaced 1.5m use to irrigate the plants. If
the discharge rate of the distributors is 8l/h, find the percentage of area of wetting.
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Use of multiple emissions
• The shallow rooted or short duration crops suffer if water being applied from a single
distributor. The anchorage is important to tree plant.
• Application of water to tree plant at early stage may be suitable by the single distributor.
• As the tree plants grow further common sense suggests that water should be applied
uniformly around the plant bottom for the uniform development of root system in any
direction and provides better anchorage.
• This may be done by increasing the number of the distributors from one to two and two to
few and making the distributors pointing progressively outward matching with the growth of
trees from the trunk to encourage spreading of the roots.
• There may be different arrangement of distributors around the plant bottom.
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
• The number of emission points and their spacing is related by the following equation:
P nSep Sw
=
100 St S r
Where,
n = the number of emission points per tree,
Sep= the spacing between emission points,
Sw= the width of wetted strip, which corresponds to the Sl value taken from Table 1, giving
P=100% for the given emission discharge and soil type,
St= the spacing between trees in the rows,
Sr= the spacing between tree rows.
Water distribution in drip irrigation system
Example 3
Find out the wetted area in a tree cultivation spaced 7mx7m with 3 numbers of distributors per
plant, the spacing of distributors 2m and the discharge rate 4l/h of each distributor. Assume
medium textured soil.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
• Following steps are undertaken to design drip irrigation system for a given crop, area and
water availability:
• Survey of the area
• Water quality consideration
• Soil type
• Emitter selection
• Type of crop and peak water requirement
• Design of lateral, sub main and main lines
• Selection of pump
• Selection of prime mover
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Survey of the area
• Survey of the area, where the drip irrigation system is to be installed, requires the following
data to be collected:
• Topography of area and relative position of highest point to the pumping unit
• Quality and quantity of available water and time of irrigation
• Power source available with farmer
• Soil type
• Crops to be grown
• Physical features on ground surface and preparation of a base map.
• Demarcation of the area where main lines, submain lines and laterals are to be installed. Main-
lines, sub-main lines and laterals should be installed in such a way that they should not interfere
with the normal tractor operations.
• Estimated cost (the system must be economical for the farmer).
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Water quality consideration
• In drip irrigation system, water comes out from the emitters which have very small openings and can
be clogged due to the soil particles, salts, which are always present in water.
• So, water quality is very important criteria in designing an efficient drip irrigation system for the
area under consideration.
• Analysis of water tells about the presence of chemicals like calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate,
carbonates, silicates, sulfides etc., and suspended solids like sand, silt, clay, algae and bacteria.
• Calcium and iron precipitates are a potential problem with most of the well water.
• If bicarbonate level is higher than 2.0 meq per liter coupled with pH > 7.5, it is a major
problem for emitter clogging.
• Iron is present in water in soluble (ferrous) form. It can produce enough slime to plug emitters if
the water supply has an iron concentration of 0.3 parts per million (ppm) or greater and the pH
of water is between 4.0 and 8.5.
• Algae are common in most surface water supplies, which can also clog emitters.
• Filtration system has to be selected according to the quality of irrigation water.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Soil Type
• In designing of drip irrigation system, soil type is always determined, which helps in the
selection of emitters/drippers and their discharge.
• In light soils the distribution of the water will be narrow and deeper.
• In heavy soil the distribution of the water will be relatively in spherical shape, wider and
less deep.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Emitter Selection
• Emitter selection in designing a drip irrigation system depends upon the type of soil.
• The water from the emitter enters the soil and moves downward and sideways forming a
cone (wetting pattern).
• The size and shape of the cone are affected mainly by emitter discharge, type of soil and
duration of water application.
• Cone formation in heavy soils is shallower and wider, whereas, in lighter soils cone is
narrower and deeper.
• In loamy soil, the water will move slowly and water will spread evenly.
• In heavy soils water is absorbed very slowly and runoff can occur if water is applied
quickly because of densely packed particles of the soil profile. Therefore, there will be
more lateral movement as compared to vertical movement.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Emitter Selection cont’d
The emitter selection mainly depends on the infiltration rate of the soil.
The emitter spacing decides the emitter discharge, however, the selection of emitter spacing
and discharge for different soil is given in Table 2.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Emitter selection cont’d
Table 2: Recommended emitter spacing (cm) for different soil types and emitter discharge
Usually, emitter with 2 Lph discharge is used for heavy soils. In lighter soils, which are very
loose and absorb water very quickly, no runoff occurs. Sandy soils do not hold water and thus
dry out very quickly. For sandy soils 4 Lph discharge emitter can be used.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Type of Crop and Peak Water Requirement
• Since under drip irrigation only a portion of the soil is wetted, the evaporation component
of evapotranspiration can be reduced accordingly, using the appropriate ground cover
reduction factor Kr.
𝐸𝑇𝑜 ∗𝐾𝑐∗𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑦 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
• For the design of drip irrigation systems: 𝐸𝑇𝑐 =
𝐸𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦
• The value of percent area wetted is 100% for closely spaced crops with rows and emitter
lines less than 1.8m
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Type of Crop and Peak Water Requirement
• Drip irrigation system designed for its maximum capacity, should consider type of crop and
its peak water requirement.
• To calculate system irrigation requirement, row to row spacing, emitter to emitter spacing
and discharge of emitters for a certain crop are needed to be decided as given below:
Area m2 ∗Emitter flow Lph
Total flow Lph =
Lateral spacing m ∗Emitter spacing m
• Application rate is defined as depth of water applied per unit time or flow rate per unit area.
• It can be calculated by following two methods:
Total flow Lph
Application rate mm/hr =
Total area m2
Emitter flow Lph
Application rate mm/hr =
Lateral spacing m ∗Emitter spacing m
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Design of laterals, sub-main and main pipe
• The design of lateral, sub-main and main-line involves:
• Selection of required pipe diameter for a given length which can carry the required
amount of discharge to the plant or crop in such a way that friction loss (head loss and
velocity) should not exceed the designing criteria.
• The designing criteria is as following:
• The head loss in main and sub main pipe should not exceed 1 m/100 m and velocity
should not exceed 1.5 m/sec.
• The head loss in lateral should not exceed 20% of operating pressure of emitter.
• Availability in the market, affordability of price, and durability of material are also
important aspects in selecting an efficient and economic pipe network.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Design of laterals, sub-main and main pipe
• Head loss in lateral, submain and mainline is calculated by using Hazen Williams equation
given as following:
10 Q 1.852
1.212∗10 c
hf = ∗ L + Le
D4.865
Where, hf = Friction head loss (m), c = Hazen-William’s roughness constant (given in table
3), Q = Flow rate (Lps), D = Inside diameter (mm), L= Length (m), Le= Equivalent length
of accessories (given in table 4)
• Head loss can also be calculated through Darcy Weisbach equation:
fLQ2
hf = 6.377 5
D
Where: hf = Head loss (m), f= friction factor for Darcy equation, L= Length of pipe (m)
Q = Flow in pipe (Lph), D= Diameter of pipe (mm)
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Design of laterals, sub-main and main pipe
Table 3: Hazen-Williams Coefficient ‘c’ for different Materials
Friction factor (f) in Darcy equation for different flow regimes and Reynold’s numbers can be calculated using:
64
𝑓= For 𝑅𝑒 < 2000
𝑅𝑒 Where f = friction factor
1 𝑒 9.35
= 1.14 − 2𝑙𝑜𝑔10 + For 𝑅𝑒 > 4000 e = internal roughness of pipe
𝑓 𝐷 𝑅𝑒 𝑓
1 𝑒 D = internal diameter of pipe
= 2𝑙𝑜𝑔10 + 1.14 For 𝑅𝑒 > 10000 Re = Reynold’s number
𝑓 𝐷
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Selection of pump
• Discharge and head are the two important parameters for the selection of the pump in the
design of drip irrigation system.
• Pump discharge is calculated by multiplying the emitter discharge by total number of
emitters in the area.
• Head developed by the pump should be sufficient to overcome head loss in the system and
provide 1 bar head at the exit.
• Total head loss includes: head loss in laterals, sub-main, main, emitter operating pressure
and head loss in power unit and filtration system.
• Pump size can be selected using pump characteristic curves provided by the manufacturer.
Design of Drip Irrigation System
Selection of pump
Where,
Q d = mean flow rate variation, percent,
qr = nominal emitter flow rate, lph,
qavr = average emitter flow rate, lph
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Hydraulic Characteristics
• Keller and Karmeli (1974) have shown that the emitter flow can be characterized by:
𝑞 = 𝐾𝑑 𝐻 𝑥
Where,
q = emitter flow rate, lph,
K d = coefficient discharge,
H = pressure head at the emitter, kg/cm2,
x = emitter discharge exponent
• The value of x characterizes the flow regime and relationship between discharge versus pressure of
the emitter.
• The lower the value of x, the less discharge will be affected by the pressure variation.
• The flow in simple orifice and nozzle emitters is turbulent where x = 0.5. For fully compensating
emitters, x = 0.0. The exponent for long path emitter varies from 0.7 to 0.8. For vortex emitters, x is
about 0.4. The exponent for tortuous path emitters usually falls between 0.5 and 0.7.
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Hydraulic Characteristics
• The relationship between the emitter flow variation and the pressure variation is given by
q var = 1 − 1 − Hvar x
Hmax −Hmin
Hvar =
Hmax
Where, q var = emitter flow variation, Hvar = pressure variation, Hmax and Hmin maximum and
minimum pressure in the line
• When the value of x is 0.5 , true for most of the orifice type of emitters, a pressure variation of
20% is equivalent to a 10% emitter flow variation, and a pressure variation of 10% is equivalent
to a 5% emitter flow variation.
• The emission uniformity is a quantitative expression of the emitter flow variation. Another way
of calculating the emitter flow variation is by comparing the maximum with minimum emitter
qmax −qmin
flow. The emitter flow variation is calculated by q var =
qmax
where, q max & q min = maximum and minimum emitter flow variation along the line, respectively.
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Operational Characteristics
• The operational characteristic of emitters includes the uniformity of water emission from
emitters. Various formulae for estimating emission uniformity are given below.
Emission Uniformity
• Emission uniformity is a measure of the uniformity of emissions from all the emission
points within an entire drip irrigation system.
• As per Keller and Karmeli (1974), the emission uniformity is given by
qn
EU = ∗ 100
qavr
Where,
EU = emission uniformity,
qn = average of lowest ¼ of emitter flow rate, lph,
qavr =average emitter flow rate, lph
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Operational Characteristics
Absolute Emission Uniformity
• Keller and Karmeli (1974) proposed the following formula for estimating absolute emission
uniformity:
1 qn qavr
EUa = + ∗ 100
2 qavr qx
Where,
𝑞𝑛 = average of lowest ¼ of emitter flow rate, lph,
𝑞𝑎𝑣𝑟 = average emitter flow rate, lph,
𝑞𝑥 = average of highest 1/8 of emitter flow rate, lph
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Operational Characteristics
Emission Uniformity
• Karmeli and Keller (1975) modified the above proposed emission uniformity formula for
testing the drip irrigation system in the field as
Cv qmin
EU = 100 ∗ 1 − 1.27
n qavr
Where,
EU= design emission uniformity, % ,
Cv = manufacturing coefficient of variation for point or line source emitters,
n = number of emitter per plant or 1 for line source emitter,
qmin = minimum emitter discharge rate at minimum pressure in the section, lph,
qavr = average or design emitter discharge rate, lph
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Operational Characteristics
Uniformity Coefficient
• The degree of emitter flow variation can be represented by a term called uniformity
coefficient as defined by Christiansen (1942).
• The uniformity coefficient for emitter flow variation can be expressed as
σx
CU = 1 − ∗ 100
m∗n
Where,
CU = uniformity coefficient, %,
x = absolute deviation of the individual observation from the mean discharge, lph,
m = mean of all observation, lph,
n = number of observations
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Water application uniformity – Statistical uniformity
• The water application uniformity is affected by hydraulic design, land slope, operating
pressure, pipe size, emitter spacing and emitter discharge variability.
• The coefficient of variation and the statistical uniformity are used to evaluate emitter
discharge variation and to differentiate between hydraulic design and emitter performance
variation
• Statistical uniformity is used to evaluate water application uniformity within a sub main
unit or throughout the drip irrigation system
• Statistical uniformity of the emitter discharge rate is determined as
Us = 1 − Cv ∗ 100
Where,
Us = statistical uniformity of the emitter discharge rate,
Cv = coefficient of variation
Performance Evaluation of Emission Devices
Table 6: Comparison of statistical uniformity and emission uniformity