INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(Elementary/Secondary Teachers I, II, III )

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA
Basic Teaching-
Education Learning 35 %
Service Process
NOTE: EXAMPLES ONLY ARE
GIVEN AND SHALL BE
1. Prepared lesson log, 15% 5-prepared lesson log 9-10 times every quarter, REPLACED BY THE
June 2017
and school forms/records class records quarterly and school forms regularly TEACHER’S ACTUAL
to
( f-2, f-5, item analysis, and submitted them on scheduled time with RESULTS AND POINTS.
March
class records) regularly complete and correct entries. CORRESPONDING POINTS
2018 4 4 4 4
and submit them on the 4- prepared lesson log 7-8 times every quarter, SHALL BE ENCODED 0.6
given schedule with class records quarterly and school forms regularly OPPOSITE THE
complete and correct and submitted them on scheduled time with CORRESPONDING
entries. (15%) complete and correct entries. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR.
3- prepared lesson log 5-6 times every quarter, THESE ITALICIZED NOTES
class record quarterly and school forms regularly SHALL BE DELETED UPON
with 1day late submission, but with complete and SUBMISSION)
correct entries.
2- prepared lesson log 3-4 times every quarter, Submitted on time the ff:
class record quarterly and school forms regularly Q1: 10 lesson logs, class
with 2-3 days late submission, but with complete record and Form 138
and correct entries. Q2: 9 lesson logs, class record
1- prepared lesson log 1-2 times every quarter, and Form 138
class record quarterly and school forms regularly Q3: 8 lesson logs, class record
with 4-5 days late submission, but with complete and Form 48
and correct entries. Q4: 8 lesson logs, class record,
Form 137, Form 138 and Form
18
Basic Teaching- Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS T Ave. Score
Education Learning OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Service Process KRA
2. Employed/Utilized June 2017 5-employed 9-10 different effective teaching
effective teaching to 15 % strategies and utilized instructional materials Use of: 4 4
strategies and utilized March which are significant to learning and suited to the 1. video lessons
instructional materials 2018 needs. 2. power point

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /1

 presentations,
which are significant to 3. educational games,
learning and suited to the 4. cooperative learning 4 4 0.6
4- employed 7-8 different effective teaching
needs of the learners. strategies,
strategies and utilized instructional materials
5. group dynamics,
which are significant to learning and suited to the
MOV: video lessons and 6. ICT integration,
needs of the learners.
power point presentations, 7. Localization
3- employed 5-6 effective teaching strategies
educational games, /indigenization
and utilized instructional materials which are
cooperative learning
significant to learning and suited to the needs of
strategies, group Documentation, DLL/DLP
the learners .
dynamics, ICT integration showing the use of the
2- employed 3-4 effective teaching strategies and
localization, indigenization teaching strategy & instructional
utilized instructional materials which are significant
etc. materials.
to learning and suited to the needs of the learners.
1- employed 1-2 effective teaching strategies and
Documentation, DLL/DLP
utilized instructional materials which are significant
showing the use of the
to learning and suited to the needs of the learners.
teaching strategy &
instructional materials

June 2017 5%
3. Provided Conducted remediation on
to 5-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
intervention/remediation to (inclusive date) to (number of
March the failing/low performing students resulting to 5%
all the failing/low failing students) with the
2018 increase in their fourth quarter grade.
performing students following increase in grades:
4-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
having positive results with
the failing/low performing students resulting to 4%
complete documentations. 5 students from grades of 72 to
increase in their fourth quarter grade 3 3 .15
75. (3%) 3
3-provided intervention/remediation activities to all 3
the failing/low performing students resulting to 3%
increase in their fourth quarter grade.
2-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
the failing/low performing students resulting to 2%
increase in their fourth quarter grade.
1-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
the failing/low performing students resulting to 1%
increase in their fourth quarter grade.

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS T Ave. Score

OBJECTIVES E
MFOs KRAs TIMELINE per (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q
ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA
Basic Student
Education Outcomes 35 %
Service

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /2

 1. Participated in English
Club activities that could
enhance students’ skills,
talents, competence and
knowledge.
(Change specific learning
area in the Secondary or
Different Club activities
in the Elementary)
June 2017
to 10% 5-participated in 5 English Club activities (English
Festival, Reading Month Celebrations, Reading Participated in:
March
Hour, Speech Clinic etc.) with complete 1. Reading Month on
2018
(inclusive dates).
documentations.
4- participated in 4 English Club activities (English 2. English Festival on (date)
Festival………) with complete documentation.
3- participated in 3 English Club activities (English
Festival……) with complete documentation.
2- participated in 2 English Club activities (English 2 2 2 2 0.2
Festival…) with complete documentation.
1- participated in 1 English Club activity with
complete documentations.

2. Administered Project 10% 5-Administered project reader to students with Pre- Post- 5 5 5 5 0.5
Reader to students with zero non-reader and 13% and above increase for Test Test
significant increase in the independent readers in post-test results. Non-Readers 2 0
post test result. 4- Administered project reader to students with Frustration 15 7
zero non-reader and 10-12% increase for Instructional 20 12
independent readers in post-test results. Independent 8 26
(Phil-IRI in Elem, Project
Computation:
Non-Numerates in 3- Administered project reader to students with
% increase in independent
Mathematics, Projects in zero non-reader and 7-9% increase for readers 26-8= 16/8= 20%
different Learning Areas independent readers in post-test results.
or Post-test result in all 2- Administered project reader to students with
learning areas in contrast zero non-reader and 4-6% increase for
with the Pre-test result) – independent readers in post-test results
given at the end of the 1-Administered project reader to students with
School Year) zero non-reader and 1-3% increase for
independent readers in post-test results
Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS T Ave. Score
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA

Basic Student
Education Outcomes
Service
5 5 5 5 0.5
DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /3
 5-Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-risk
3. Conducted home 10% No. of SARDO’s – 6
within a year which resulted to zero drop-out rate
visitations to all students- No. of Home Visits- 6
and 95-100% promotion rate. No. of Drop-out-1
at-risk of dropping-out or 4- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at- Promotion Rate:
failing having positive risk within a year which resulted to 1 drop-out and 49 pupils/students out of 50 or
results with complete 94% promotion rate. (49÷50 x 100 )=98%
documentations. 3- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 2 drop-outs
and 93% promotion rate.
2- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 3 drop-outs
and 92% promotion rate.
1- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 4 drop-outs
and 91% promotion rate

4. Increased the General 5% 5-increased 5% students’ General Students’

Students’ Average (GSA) Average (GSA) in their final grades. No. of students/pupils: _____
of students in their final 4-increased 4% students’ GSA in their final
4 4 4 4 0.2
grades. grades. GSA in Q1: 79
3-increased 3% students’ GSA in their final GSA in Q4: 83
grades
(baseline- 1st Quarter 2-increased 2% students’ GSA in their final 83-79= 4%
Grades) grades
1-increased 1% students’ GSA in their final
grades

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
KRA
Basic Community
Education Involvement 15 %
Service

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /4


1. Conducted meetings
with the Homeroom PTA
Officers with positive
results.
Required Evidences:
- Notice/ letter to
parents/guardians
- Agenda/ Schedule
-Minutes of Meetings-
Attendance Duly signed by
the attendees
-Documentation/ pictorials
Possible Evidences for
Positive Results
Initiated projects/ events/
activities with external
funding/ sponsorship
within the school year.
-Deed of donations
-Documentation/ Pictorials
-Approved Project
Proposals of the PTA.
2. Participated in the
different community
activities or
outreach programs with
complete documentations.
-Government or non-
government.
Required Evidences:
a. Memorandum
b. Certificates if
available
c. Documentation (pic)
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
Basic Professional
Education Growth &
Service Development
5-conducted meeting with the Homeroom PTA
June 2017 10% Conducted Homeroom PTA
to Officers 8 times a year with 5 items/evidences of meetings five (5) times.
positive results (repainting of classroom,
March 1. ______________ (date)
2018 provision of indoor plants, resolved issues 2. _______________
concerning student, conducted PTC etc.) with 3. _______________
4. _______________
complete documentations.
4- conducted meeting with the Homeroom PTA 5. _______________
Officers 7 times a year with 4 items/evidences of
Attached evidences:
positive results with complete documentations.
3- conducted meeting with the Homeroom PTA _________________
Officers 6 times a year with 3 items/evidences of _________________
_________________
positive results with complete documentations.
2 2 2 2 0.2
2- conducted meeting with the Homeroom PTA
Officers 5 times a year with 2 items/evidences of
positive results with complete documentations.
1- conducted meeting with the Homeroom
PTA Officers 4 times a year with 1 item/evidence
of positive result with complete documentations.
5-participated in 5 different community activities or
June 2017 5% outreach programs in a year (Coastal clean-up, Participated in:
to 1, ______________________
Riverth, Tree Planting, Feeding, Clean-up, etc.).
March on ____________________.
4-participated in 4 different community activities or
2018 2. ____________ _________
outreach programs in a year. on ___________________.
3-participated in 3 different community activities or 3 3 3 3 .15
outreach programs in a year. 3. _____________ _________
2- participated in 2 community activity or outreach on ___________________.
program in a year.
1- participated in 1 community activity or outreach
program in a year.
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
TIMELINE per (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
KRA
15%
DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /5

1. Completed an
action research that will
help in strengthening
skills in the subject
taught. (5%) can be
CBAR, BERF or Non-
BERF.
2. Prepared a strategic
intervention material in
English with evidence of
utilization.
SIM maybe replaced by
other innovative outputs-
video lessons, worksheets
etc. (School Principal).
OBJECTIVES
MFOs KRAs
3. Attended relevant
trainings to enhance one’s
skill and knowledge about
Completed the action
June 2017 5% 5- completed an action research relevant in research/research proposal 5 5 5 5 .50
to English, submitted and approved by the SDO.. entitled
March “________________________
4- completed an action research relevant in
2018
English for approval in the Division Office. ________________________
3- completed an action research proposal
relevant in English approved by the SDO. _________________________
2- completed an action research proposal and approved by the Division
relevant in English for approval in the school Office/ School/ Principal on
level. _________________(date)
1- completed an action research proposal
relevant in English for checking in the school
level.
June 2017 5% 5-prepared a SIM in English with proposal 5 5 5 5 .25
to approved by the SDO with evidence of
March utilization. Prepared/ Conceptualized SIM
2018 entitled:
4- prepared a SIM in English with proposal
“ ________________________
which was approved by the Division Office.
3- prepared a SIM in English with proposal
which was submitted for approval in the SDO.
2- conceptualized a SIM in English for checking _______________________”
in the school level.
1- started conceptualizing a SIM in English. Checked and approved at the
Schools Division Office on
(date___________)
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) T Ave. Score
TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
KRA
5-attended one international level training or 64
hours of combined school/district/division level Attended the following trainings:
trainings or seminars. 1. (Title) on (inclusive dates) at
DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /6
 the newest trends in 4- attended one national level training or 56 (place) 4 4 4 4 .20
education with proper hours of combined school/district/division level
documentations. trainings or seminars
3- attended one regional level training or 48
Total: 56 hours
hours of combined school/district/division level
trainings or seminars
2- attended 40 hours of combined
school/district/division level trainings or
seminars
1- attended 32 hours of combined
school/district/division level trainings or
seminars

Plus Factor This is another KRA 5% Possible Plus factors

which is not part of the Coordinator/Adviser of Class/ Club (overload)
regular KRA of Teachers Special assignment, Speakership/Trainer
i-III. This is applicable
Demonstration Teacher
only if 95% is the sum of
all KRAs. Winnings (Coach)
Other acceptable evidences
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL RATING FOR 4.3
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority

____________________________ __________________________ ______________________________

Master Teacher/Head Teacher/Principal Teacher I-III Principal

Note: 1. Percentage per KRA may vary depending on the situation. Teachers handling first sections may not conduct remediation and instead will have 5% plus
factor for the accomplishments within the School Year.
2. Non-Advisers may not have conducted PTA meeting but can be replaced by constant communication /dialogue with parents.
3. If the Non-Advisers have no Home Visitation, the percentage intended for this KRA can be replaced by the Plus factors and an additional percentage to the Increase of the pupil/student’s GSA.
4. With the sample Actual Results and Computation (Write opposite points and score).
5. Notes shall be deleted and the Actual results of the teachers shall replace the given sample.

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /7