Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Typical
Unitised Structural Glazing
Page 1 of 39
MEMBER DESIGN
( TYPICAL UNITISED GLAZING )
Mid Transoms
Major Moment of Inertia (Ixx) = 368.53 cm4
4
Minor Moment of Inertia (Iyy) = 93.36 cm
Max Centroidal Distance (cx) = 3.50 cm
Max Centroidal Distance (cy) = 9.19 cm
3
Major Sectional Modulus (Zxx) = 40.09 cm
Minor Sectional Modulus (Zyy) = 26.67 cm3
2
Crossectional Area (A) = 11.52 cm
Self Weight = 3.12 Kg/m
Page 2 of 39
Split Transoms Cill Profile & Head Profile
4
Major Moment of Inertia (Ixx) = 228.00 & 319.53 cm
Minor Moment of Inertia (Iyy) = 12.02 & 40.59 cm4
Max Centroidal Distance (cx) = 1.40 & 4.19 cm
Max Centroidal Distance (cy) = 9.26 & 10.35 cm
3
Major Sectional Modulus (Zxx) = 24.63 & 30.87 cm
Minor Sectional Modulus (Zyy) = 8.59 & 9.70 cm3
Crossectional Area (A) = 9.59 & 11.89 cm2
Self Weight = 2.60 & 3.22 Kg/m
Radius of gyration (rx) = 4.88 & 5.18 cm
Radius of gyration (ry) = 1.12 & 1.85 cm
L1 L1 L1 L2
Typical Mullion
Moment is Distributed among the Split Sections as per their Moment of Inertias as follows:-
M1 (Female) = 1.31 Kn-m (M X Ix1/(Ix1+Ix2))
M2 (Male) = 1.73 Kn-m (M X Ix2/(Ix1+Ix2))
Shear is Distributed among the Split Sections as per their Crossectional areas as follows:-
V1 (Female) = 1.860 Kn (V X A1/(A1+A2))
V2 (Male) = 2.375 Kn (V X A2/(A1+A2))
Page 3 of 39
P1 (Female) = 0.969 Kn (P/2)
P2 (Male) = 0.969 Kn (P/2)
Calculation of Loading L
Page 4 of 39
Bending Moment (My) = 0.08 Kn-m (W y a + wdL2/8)
Shear Force (Vy) = 0.40 Kn (W y + wdL/2)
Reaction at Support (Ry) = 0.40 Kn (W y + wdL/2)
L = 1200.00 mm
2
E X Ixx = 241387150000.00 N-mm
Due to Loading from top (dxt) = 0.064 mm ( (1/120)*w1*L^4/EIx )
Due to Loading from bottom (dxb) = 0.064 mm ( (1/120)*w2*L^4/EIx )
Therefore Total Deflection (dx) = 0.129 mm ( dxt + dxb )
Calculation of Loading
Page 5 of 39
Therefore Total B.M (Mx) = 0.11 Kn-m ( Mxt + Mxb )
L = 1200.00 mm
E X Iex = 149340000000.00 N-mm2
Due to Loading from top (dxt) = 0.064 mm ( (1/120)*w1*L^4/EIx )
Due to Loading from bottom (dxb) = 0.000 mm
Therefore Total Deflection (dx) = 0.064 mm ( dxt + dxb )
4 2 2
Max Deflection = 2.31 mm ((5/384)(wdL ) + (1/24)W y a(3L -4a ))/EIy
Permissible Deflection is = Span/ 500 or 3.0 mm
= 2.40 mm
> 2.31 mm (Actual Deflection)
Page 6 of 39
w2
TYPICAL SPLIT TRANSOM DESIGN (HEAD)
2
L
Bending Moment (My) = 0.006 Kn-m (W y a + wdL /8)
Shear Force (Vy) = 0.02 Kn (W y + wdL/2)
Reaction at Support (Ry) = 0.02 Kn (W y + wdL/2)
L = 1200.00 mm
2
E X Ixx = 209292150000.00 N-mm
Due to Loading from top (dxt) = 0.000 mm
Due to Loading from bottom (dxb) = 0.064 mm ( (1/120)*w2*L^4/EIx )
Therefore Total Deflection (dx) = 0.064 mm ( dxt + dxb )
Page 7 of 39
Permissible Deflection = Span/ 175 = 6.86 mm OR 19.00 mm
2
Max Bending Stress (sb) = 65.7 N/mm (M/z)
2
< 96.0 N/mm (pbc - As Per Tbl:4, IS:8147)
2
Max Shear Stress (tv) = 1.05 N/mm (V/bt)
2
< 51.0 N/mm (pq - As Per Tbl:4, IS:8147)
HENCE OK
Page 8 of 39
CHECK FOR LOAD TRANSFER BETWEEN SPLIT MULLION
Leg-2 Leg-3
Leg-1
Typical Mullion
Max loading (w) = 1.80 N/mm (Ww X S)
Leg-1 :-
Eccentricity (e1) = 21.40 mm
Min. Leg Thickness (t1) = 2.50 mm
Bending Moment (M1) = 38.52 N-mm (w x e1)
2
Max Bending Stress (sb) = 37.0 N/mm (6M1/t12)
2
Permissible Bending Stress = 96.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
2
Max Shear Stress (tv) = 0.72 N/mm (w/t1)
2
Permissible Shear Stress = 51.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
HENCE OK
Leg-2 :-
Eccentricity (e2) = 44.40 mm
Min. Leg Thickness (t2) = 4.00 mm
Bending Moment (M2) = 79.92 N-mm (w x e2)
2
Max Bending Stress (sb) = 30.0 N/mm (6M2/t22)
2
Permissible Bending Stress = 96.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
2
Max Shear Stress (tv) = 0.45 N/mm (w/t2)
2
Permissible Shear Stress = 51.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
HENCE OK
Leg-3 :-
Eccentricity (e3) = 21.20 mm
Min. Leg Thickness (t3) = 2.20 mm
Page 9 of 39
Bending Moment (M3) = 38.16 N-mm (w x e3)
2 2
Max Bending Stress (sb) = 47.3 N/mm (6M3/t3 )
2
Permissible Bending Stress = 96.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
2
Max Shear Stress (tv) = 0.82 N/mm (w/t3)
2
Permissible Shear Stress = 51.0 N/mm (As Per IS:8147, For 6063-T6 Grade Aluminum)
HENCE OK
Page 10 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 1.44 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 2.92 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 0.00 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 11 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
[Assuming Full engagement between flanges of profiles]
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 4200.00 mm
Ly = 0.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 77.36 (kLx/rx) (as per Tbl-6, Leff = kL, where k = 1)
ly = 0.00 (kLy/ry) (as per Tbl-6, Leff = kL, where k = 1)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 14.60 mm
Thickness (t) = 2.20 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 5.10 (one edge supported)
Page 12 of 39
Therefore (l2) = 33.85 (mb/t)
2
Fbc = 79.04 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
Clear max web depth (d) = 109.80 mm (Without stiffening)
Ratio d/t = 49.91
b/d > 2, Hence considered Infinity for Fig. 7
0.5
C1 = 82.62 (590/(Fv) )
0.5
C2 = 154.03 (1100/(Fv) )
[ No Stiffners Rqd ]
For d/t = 49.91 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 58.7 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 0.0 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 13 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 1.13 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 3.72 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 0.00 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 14 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
[Assuming Full engagement between flanges of profiles]
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 4200.00 mm
Ly = 0.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 76.02 (kLx/rx) (as per Tbl-6, Leff = kL, where k = 1
ly = 0.00 (kLy/ry) (as per Tbl-6, Leff = kL, where k = 1)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 27.80 mm
Thickness (t) = 4.00 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 5.10 (one edge supported)
Page 15 of 39
Therefore (l2) = 35.45 (mb/t)
2
Fbc = 78.82 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
Clear max web depth (d) = 103.50 mm (Without stiffening)
Ratio d/t = 47.05
b/d > 2, Hence considered Infinity for Fig. 7
0.5
C1 = 82.62 (590/(Fv) )
0.5
C2 = 154.03 (1100/(Fv) )
[ No Stiffners Rqd ]
For d/t = 47.05 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 64.6 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 0.0 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 16 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
COMBINED MULLION
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 1.27 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 6.64 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 0.00 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 17 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 4200.00 mm
Ly = 2400.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 76.36 (Lx/rx)
ly = 95.24 (Ly/ry)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 65.60 mm
Thickness (t) = 2.20 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 1.20 (both edge supported)
Therefore (l2) = 35.78 (mb/t)
Page 18 of 39
Critical (l) from above = 35.78 (max of lat, l1,l2)
2
Fbc = 78.69 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
For d/t = 65.91 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 62.8 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 0.0 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 19 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 0.00 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 0.43 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 0.14 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 20 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 1200.00 mm
Ly = 1200.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 23.15 (Lx/rx)
ly = 64.94 (Ly/ry)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 21.16 mm
Thickness (t) = 22.50 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 5.10 (1 edge supported)
Therefore (l2) = 4.80 (mb/t)
Page 21 of 39
Critical (l) from above = 76.15 (max of lat, l1,l2)
2
Fbc = 54.31 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
Clear max web depth (d) = 139.60 mm (Without stiffening)
Ratio d/t = 63.45
b/d > 2, Hence considered Infinity for Fig. 7
0.5
C1 = 82.62 (590/(Fv) )
0.5
C2 = 154.03 (1100/(Fv) )
[ No Stiffners Rqd ]
For d/t = 63.45 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 3.6 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 0.6 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 22 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 0.00 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 0.43 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 4.29 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 23 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 1200.00 mm
Ly = 1200.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 24.61 (Lx/rx)
ly = 107.19 (Ly/ry)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 23.10 mm
Thickness (t) = 2.20 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 1.20 (both edge supported)
Therefore (l2) = 12.60 (mb/t)
Page 24 of 39
Critical (l) from above = 47.51 (max of lat, l1,l2)
2
Fbc = 71.49 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
Clear max web depth (d) = 87.10 mm (Without stiffening)
Ratio d/t = 39.59
b/d > 2, Hence considered Infinity for Fig. 7
0.5
C1 = 82.62 (590/(Fv) )
0.5
C2 = 154.03 (1100/(Fv) )
[ No Stiffners Rqd ]
For d/t = 39.59 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 4.4 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 14.4 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 25 of 39
CHECK FOR STRESSES
[ As per IS:8147 ]
Calculated Stresses
2
Axial Compressive Stress (fc) = 0.00 N/mm (P/A)
Shear Stress
2
Major Direction (fsx) = 0.85 N/mm (Vx/2dt)
2
Minor Direction (fsy) = 1.29 N/mm (Vy/2bt)
Page 26 of 39
Permissible Stresses (Check for Buckling)
Direct Compression
[Using IS:8147, Fig.1]
Effective Length
Lx = 1200.00 mm
Ly = 1200.00 mm
Therefore Slenderness Ratios
lx = 21.22 (Lx/rx)
ly = 42.15 (Ly/ry)
Flange:-
Clear width of leg (b) = 65.60 mm
Thickness (t) = 2.20 mm
Buckling coefficent (m) = 1.20 (both edge supported)
Therefore (l2) = 35.78 (mb/t)
Page 27 of 39
Critical (l) from above = 76.25 (max of lat, l1,l2)
2
Fbc = 54.25 N/mm
Shear
[Using IS:8147, Clause. 8.3.3.2]
Clear max web depth (d) = 139.80 mm (Without stiffening)
Ratio d/t = 63.55
b/d > 2, Hence considered Infinity for Fig. 7
0.5
C1 = 82.62 (590/(Fv) )
0.5
C2 = 154.03 (1100/(Fv) )
[ No Stiffners Rqd ]
For d/t = 63.55 ,From Fig-7, IS:8147, Material 54300-0 (Lowest considered since graph is limited)
2
Fs = 41.0 N/mm
2 2
(fbcx2 + 3fsx2)0.5 = 5.6 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
2 2
(fbcy2 + 3fsy2)0.5 = 3.8 N/mm < 139.5 N/mm (0.9Fty)
3) Shear Stress
Page 28 of 39
TYPICAL SLAB TOP BRACKET DESIGN
(Detail Calculation)
Check for Hz Leg & calculation of Anchor Forces
H C H C
y1 kx2 y1 kx3
p p
T T
x1 x2 x3 x1 x2 x3
D D
Typical Crossection Typical Crossection
x3 x3
25
10
x4 x4
x5 B x5 B
x4 x4
10
D D
Plan Plan
Taking moments about anchor fasteners Taking moments about anchor fasteners
0.5(pBkx2)(x2-kx2/3) - V(x1+x2) - Hy1 = 0 0.5(pBkx3)(x3-kx3/3) + V(x1+x2) - Hy1 = 0
=> 75000.0 k( 100 - 33.33k ) = 1504165.0 => 56250.0 k( 75 - 25k ) = -48085.0
=> k( 100 - 33.33k ) = 20.06 => k( 75 - 25k ) = -0.85
2 2
=> 33.3 k - 100.0 k + 20.06 =0 => 25.0 k - 75.0 k - 0.85 =0
Solution of above quadratic equation for "k" Solution of above quadratic equation for "k"
ak2 + bk + c = 0 ak2 + bk + c = 0
a = 33.3 b = -100.0 c = 20.06 a = 25.0 b= -75.0 c = -0.85
k = 2.784 & 0.216 k = 3.011 & -0.011
Taking k as minimum of the 2 calculated:- Taking k as minimum of the 2 calculated:-
C = 16209.4 C = -638.7
And sum of forces, T + V - C = 0 And sum of forces, T + V - C = 0
=> T = 11774.4 => T = -5073.7
= 11.77 Kn = -5.07 Kn
BM in plate = C/2 x ((B-18)/6) BM in plate = C/2 x ((B-18)/6)
M = 313381.8 N-mm M = -12348.5 N-mm
Stress Induced (sb) = 6M/(x1+x2)t2 = 42.0 N/mm2 Bearing Stress Induced (sb) = 6M/Bt2 = -1.2 N/mm2
2 2
< 227.3 N/mm [ SAFE ] < 227.3 N/mm [ SAFE IN BEARING ]
Page 29 of 39
Bracket Material & Safety factors:-
Material Used = MildSteel - E250/A (As per IS:2062-2006)
2
Min Yeild Strength (FY) = 250.00 N/mm
2
Ultimate Tensile strength(Fu) = 410.00 N/mm
Material Safety factor (gmo) = 1.10 (yeilding)
Material Safety factor (gml) = 1.25 (ultimate stress)
Safety factor (site welds) (gmw) = 1.50
Anchor Fasteners
Page 30 of 39
Check For Hook
B1
ex
edv
D3
sv D1
10
ey
H1
D2
edv
V1
B2
edh
Hook Plate
Factored Forces:-
Horizontal Force (H) = 12.134 kN
Vertical Force (V) = 4.435 kN
No. of Hooks (n) = 2.00
Interaction Equation:-
(fs/fsp) +(fb/fbp) = 0.5901 < 1.00
Hence OK
Page 31 of 39
Strength Check for Dead Load
Shear Force (V) = 2.22 kN (V1)
2
Shear Stress (fs) = 6.30 N/mm (V/D3t1)
2
Permissible Shear Stress (fsp) = 131.22 N/mm (Fy/(30.5gmo))
Interaction Equation:-
(fs/fsp) +(fb/fbp) = 0.2597 < 1.00
Hence OK
Since Aluminum is designed using working stress method, unfactored forces are used for bearing check
F.o.S for Vertical Force [Fsv] = 2.00
F.o.S for Horizontal Force [Fsh] = 1.50
Resultant Unfactored shear (V) = 3.45 kN ((Vsv/Fsv)2+(Vsh/Fsh)2)0.5
Hence 2#s,M12 (Stainless Steel, A2/70 grade) bolts are provided per profile
Page 32 of 39
Allen Bolt
Material Used = Stainless Steel Grade A2/70
2
Min Yeild Strength (FY2) = 450.00 N/mm
2
Ult' Tensile Strength (Fu2) = 700.00 N/mm
Material Safety factor (gmb) = 1.25
Page 33 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 1
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
Specifier's comments:
1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HSA-R M12 hnom2
Return period (service life in years): 50
Seismic/Filling set or any suitable annular gap filling solution
Effective embedment depth: hef = 65 mm, hnom = 79 mm
Material: A4
Evaluation Service Report: ETA 11/0374
Issued I Valid: 8/28/2017 | -
Proof: SOFA design method + fib (07/2011) - after ETAG testing
Stand-off installation: eb = 0 mm (no stand-off); t = 16 mm
Anchor plate: lx x ly x t = 250 mm x 250 mm x 16 mm; (Recommended plate thickness: not calculated
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 250 mm x 16 mm
Base material: uncracked concrete, C20/25, fc,cyl = 20.00 N/mm2; h = 200 mm
Installation: hammer drilled hole, Installation condition: Dry
Reinforcement: no reinforcement or reinforcement spacing >= 150 mm (any ) or >= 100 mm ( <= 10 mm)
with longitudinal edge reinforcement d >= 12 + close mesh (stirrups, hangers) s <= 100
Reinforcement to control splitting according to fib (07/2011), 10.1.5.2 present
R
- The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption.
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 34 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 2
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
Anchor forces are calculated based on the assumption of a rigid anchor plate.
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 35 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 3
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
5 Combined tension and shear loads SOFA (fib (07/2011), section 10.3)
bN bV a Utilization bN,V [%] Status
steel 0.183 0.259 2.000 11 OK
concrete 0.395 0.704 1.500 84 OK
Comments: Tension displacements are valid with half of the required installation torque moment for uncracked concrete! Shear displacements
are valid without friction between the concrete and the anchor plate! The gap due to the drilled hole and clearance hole tolerances are not
included in this calculation!
The acceptable anchor displacements depend on the fastened construction and must be defined by the designer!
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 36 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 4
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
7 Warnings
The anchor design methods in PROFIS Anchor require rigid anchor plates per current regulations (ETAG 001/Annex C, EOTA TR029, etc.).
This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered - the anchor plate is
assumed to be sufficiently stiff, in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading. PROFIS Anchor calculates the minimum
required anchor plate thickness with FEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above. The proof if the
rigid anchor plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Anchor. Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the
existing conditions and for plausibility!
Your design has selected filled holes. Please ensure that there is a proper method to fill the annular gap between the fixture and HSA-R M12
hnom2, and contact Hilti in case of any questions.
The accessory list in this report is for the information of the user only. In any case, the instructions for use provided with the product have to
be followed to ensure a proper installation.
The design method fib (07/2011) assumes that no hole clearance between the anchors and the fixture is present. This can be achieved by
filling the gap with mortar of sufficient compressive strength (e.g. by using the HILTI Seismic/Filling set) or by other suitable means
The compliance with current standards (e.g. EC3) is the responsibility of the user
The anchor plate overlaps the concrete plate edges. A local concrete spalling due to compression has to be checked separately!
Checking the transfer of loads into the base material is required in accordance with fib (07/2011)!
The characteristic bond resistances depend on the return period (service life in years): 50
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 37 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 5
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
8 Installation data
Anchor plate, steel: - Anchor type and diameter: HSA-R M12 hnom2
Profile: Flat bar, ; (L x W x T) = 250 mm x 16 mm Installation torque: 0.050 kNm
Hole diameter in the fixture: df = 14 mm Hole diameter in the base material: 12 mm
Plate thickness (input): 16 mm Hole depth in the base material: 87 mm
Recommended plate thickness: not calculated Minimum thickness of the base material: 140 mm
Drilling method: Hammer drilled
Cleaning: Manual cleaning of the drilled hole according to instructions
for use is required.
125 125
75
2 1 125
x
175
117
125
50 150 50
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 38 of 39
www.hilti.in Profis Anchor 2.8.8
Company: Page: 6
Specifier: Project:
Address: Sub-Project I Pos. No.:
Phone I Fax: | Date: 8/12/2020
E-Mail:
Input data and results must be checked for agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Anchor ( c ) 2003-2009 Hilti AG, FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG, Schaan
Page 39 of 39